claude-flow-novice 2.12.0 → 2.14.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.claude/commands/README.md +177 -129
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/README.md +177 -129
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cfn-loop-cli.md +279 -0
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cfn-loop-document.md +20 -1
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cfn-loop-frontend.md +17 -2
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cfn-loop-task.md +460 -0
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/context-curate.md +27 -38
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/context-inject.md +14 -25
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/context-query.md +40 -45
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/context-reflect.md +40 -38
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/context-stats.md +13 -38
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/launch-web-dashboard.md +0 -295
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/list-agents-rebuild.md +18 -18
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/write-plan.md +246 -75
- package/dist/agents/agent-loader.js +165 -146
- package/dist/agents/agent-loader.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/config-manager.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/auto-compact.md +0 -80
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cfn-loop-epic.md +0 -478
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cfn-loop-single.md +0 -256
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cfn-loop-sprints.md +0 -396
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cfn-loop.md +0 -518
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/claude-md.md +0 -64
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/claude-soul.md +0 -22
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cost-savings-off.md +0 -35
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cost-savings-on.md +0 -35
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/cost-savings-status.md +0 -34
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/custom-routing-activate.md +0 -55
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/custom-routing-deactivate.md +0 -46
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/dependency-recommendations.md +0 -171
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/fullstack.md +0 -179
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/github.md +0 -221
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/hooks.md +0 -38
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/metrics-summary.md +0 -58
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/neural.md +0 -39
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/parse-epic.md +0 -357
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/performance.md +0 -41
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/sparc.md +0 -46
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/suggest-improvements.md +0 -95
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/suggest-templates.md +0 -147
- package/claude-assets/commands/cfn/swarm.md +0 -24
|
@@ -1,104 +1,275 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: "CFN Loop pre-planning: Generate structured implementation plans with TDD approach"
|
|
3
|
+
argument-hint: "<task description> [--mode=mvp|standard|enterprise]"
|
|
4
|
+
allowed-tools: ["Task", "TodoWrite", "Read", "Write", "Bash"]
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
2
6
|
|
|
3
|
-
|
|
4
|
-
The `write-plan` command helps create structured, test-driven implementation plans for claude-flow-novice projects, leveraging our CFN Loop workflow and adaptive context strategies.
|
|
7
|
+
# Write Plan - CFN Loop Pre-Planning
|
|
5
8
|
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
9
|
+
Generate structured implementation plan BEFORE executing CFN Loop. Outputs plan document for review.
|
|
7
10
|
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
- Always start with failure scenarios (Red phase)
|
|
10
|
-
- Implement minimal code to pass tests (Green phase)
|
|
11
|
-
- Refactor for quality and maintainability (Refactor phase)
|
|
11
|
+
🎯 **Use this BEFORE /cfn-loop-cli or /cfn-loop-task**
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
Utilize the CFN Loop workflow for complex implementations:
|
|
15
|
-
- **Loop 3 (Implementation)**: Create detailed implementation plan
|
|
16
|
-
- **Loop 2 (Validation)**: Comprehensive test and review
|
|
17
|
-
- **Product Owner Decision**: Strategic go/no-go checkpoint
|
|
13
|
+
**Task**: $ARGUMENTS
|
|
18
14
|
|
|
19
|
-
##
|
|
15
|
+
## What This Does
|
|
20
16
|
|
|
17
|
+
**Pre-planning phase for CFN Loop:**
|
|
18
|
+
1. Analyzes task complexity
|
|
19
|
+
2. Selects appropriate agents
|
|
20
|
+
3. Defines test cases and success criteria
|
|
21
|
+
4. Creates implementation roadmap
|
|
22
|
+
5. Outputs plan document for approval
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
**Then run:**
|
|
25
|
+
```bash
|
|
26
|
+
# After reviewing plan
|
|
27
|
+
/cfn-loop-cli "Implement JWT authentication" --mode=standard
|
|
28
|
+
# OR
|
|
29
|
+
/cfn-loop-task "Implement JWT authentication" --mode=standard
|
|
30
|
+
```
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Command Options
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
```bash
|
|
35
|
+
# Standard planning
|
|
36
|
+
/write-plan "Implement JWT authentication"
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
# MVP planning (faster, simpler)
|
|
39
|
+
/write-plan "Build prototype feature" --mode=mvp
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
# Enterprise planning (comprehensive)
|
|
42
|
+
/write-plan "Production security system" --mode=enterprise
|
|
43
|
+
```
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
**Options:**
|
|
46
|
+
- `--mode=<mvp|standard|enterprise>`: Planning depth (default: standard)
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
## Execution Pattern
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
### Step 1: Analyze Task
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
```javascript
|
|
53
|
+
Task("planner", `
|
|
54
|
+
ANALYZE TASK FOR CFN LOOP PLANNING
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
Task: $ARGUMENTS
|
|
57
|
+
Mode: ${mode}
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
ANALYSIS REQUIRED:
|
|
60
|
+
1. Complexity Assessment:
|
|
61
|
+
- Estimated files: 1-2 (simple) | 3-5 (standard) | >5 (complex)
|
|
62
|
+
- Estimated LOC: <200 (simple) | 200-500 (standard) | >500 (complex)
|
|
63
|
+
- Keywords: security, performance, frontend, mobile, etc.
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
2. Agent Selection:
|
|
66
|
+
- Loop 3 (Implementation): Based on task type
|
|
67
|
+
* Backend: backend-dev, researcher, devops
|
|
68
|
+
* Full-stack: backend-dev, react-frontend-engineer, devops
|
|
69
|
+
* Mobile: mobile-dev, backend-dev
|
|
70
|
+
* Security: security-specialist, backend-dev
|
|
71
|
+
- Loop 2 (Validation): Scale by complexity
|
|
72
|
+
* Simple: reviewer, tester
|
|
73
|
+
* Standard: +architect, +security-specialist
|
|
74
|
+
* Complex: +code-analyzer, +performance-benchmarker
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
3. Test Cases (TDD Approach):
|
|
77
|
+
- Red Phase: Failure scenarios
|
|
78
|
+
- Green Phase: Minimal passing implementation
|
|
79
|
+
- Refactor Phase: Quality improvements
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
4. Success Criteria:
|
|
82
|
+
- Test coverage target (≥80%)
|
|
83
|
+
- Performance benchmarks (if applicable)
|
|
84
|
+
- Security requirements (if applicable)
|
|
85
|
+
- Deliverables list
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
OUTPUT: planning/PLAN_${sanitize($ARGUMENTS)}.md
|
|
88
|
+
`)
|
|
89
|
+
```
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
### Step 2: Generate Plan Document
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
**Plan Structure:**
|
|
21
94
|
```markdown
|
|
22
|
-
# [
|
|
95
|
+
# Implementation Plan: [Task Name]
|
|
23
96
|
|
|
24
|
-
##
|
|
25
|
-
-
|
|
26
|
-
-
|
|
97
|
+
## Task Analysis
|
|
98
|
+
- **Complexity**: Simple | Standard | Complex
|
|
99
|
+
- **Estimated Files**: N
|
|
100
|
+
- **Estimated LOC**: N
|
|
101
|
+
- **Mode**: ${mode}
|
|
27
102
|
|
|
28
|
-
##
|
|
29
|
-
- Epic Context
|
|
30
|
-
- Sprint Context
|
|
31
|
-
- Specific Deliverables
|
|
103
|
+
## Agent Configuration
|
|
32
104
|
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
-
|
|
35
|
-
-
|
|
36
|
-
-
|
|
105
|
+
### Loop 3 (Implementation)
|
|
106
|
+
- agent-1 (role)
|
|
107
|
+
- agent-2 (role)
|
|
108
|
+
- agent-3 (role)
|
|
37
109
|
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
-
|
|
41
|
-
-
|
|
110
|
+
### Loop 2 (Validation)
|
|
111
|
+
- reviewer (code review)
|
|
112
|
+
- tester (quality assurance)
|
|
113
|
+
[+ architect, security-specialist for standard/enterprise]
|
|
42
114
|
|
|
43
|
-
###
|
|
44
|
-
-
|
|
45
|
-
- Edge cases
|
|
46
|
-
- Performance expectations
|
|
115
|
+
### Product Owner
|
|
116
|
+
- product-owner (PROCEED/ITERATE/ABORT decision)
|
|
47
117
|
|
|
48
|
-
##
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
118
|
+
## Test-Driven Development Plan
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
### Phase 1: Red (Failure Scenarios)
|
|
121
|
+
**Deliverables:**
|
|
122
|
+
- [ ] Test script: tests/test-[feature].sh
|
|
123
|
+
- [ ] Failure test cases defined
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
**Test Cases:**
|
|
126
|
+
1. [Test case 1 - expected failure]
|
|
127
|
+
2. [Test case 2 - edge case]
|
|
128
|
+
3. [Test case 3 - performance requirement]
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
### Phase 2: Green (Minimal Implementation)
|
|
131
|
+
**Deliverables:**
|
|
50
132
|
- [ ] Minimal working implementation
|
|
51
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
133
|
+
- [ ] All test cases passing
|
|
52
134
|
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
135
|
+
**Implementation Steps:**
|
|
136
|
+
1. [Core functionality]
|
|
137
|
+
2. [Basic validation]
|
|
138
|
+
3. [Minimal error handling]
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
### Phase 3: Refactor (Quality Improvement)
|
|
141
|
+
**Deliverables:**
|
|
142
|
+
- [ ] Code quality improvements
|
|
143
|
+
- [ ] Enhanced test coverage (≥80%)
|
|
144
|
+
- [ ] Documentation
|
|
58
145
|
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
146
|
+
**Refactoring Goals:**
|
|
147
|
+
1. [Code organization]
|
|
148
|
+
2. [Performance optimization]
|
|
149
|
+
3. [Security hardening]
|
|
63
150
|
|
|
64
151
|
## Success Criteria
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
-
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
### Quality Gates
|
|
154
|
+
- Loop 3 Gate: ≥${mode === 'enterprise' ? 0.85 : mode === 'standard' ? 0.75 : 0.70}
|
|
155
|
+
- Loop 2 Consensus: ≥${mode === 'enterprise' ? 0.95 : mode === 'standard' ? 0.90 : 0.80}
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
### Deliverables
|
|
158
|
+
- [ ] All test cases passing
|
|
159
|
+
- [ ] Test coverage ≥80%
|
|
160
|
+
- [ ] Code complexity <15 per function
|
|
161
|
+
- [ ] Security review complete
|
|
162
|
+
- [ ] Documentation updated
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
### Performance Benchmarks (if applicable)
|
|
165
|
+
- [Benchmark 1]
|
|
166
|
+
- [Benchmark 2]
|
|
68
167
|
|
|
69
168
|
## Potential Blockers
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
**Technical:**
|
|
171
|
+
- [Potential blocker 1]
|
|
172
|
+
- [Mitigation strategy]
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
**Dependencies:**
|
|
175
|
+
- [External dependency 1]
|
|
176
|
+
- [Fallback plan]
|
|
72
177
|
|
|
73
178
|
## Iteration Strategy
|
|
74
|
-
-
|
|
75
|
-
- Confidence threshold:
|
|
76
|
-
- Adaptive agent spawning
|
|
179
|
+
- Max iterations: ${mode === 'enterprise' ? 15 : mode === 'standard' ? 10 : 5}
|
|
180
|
+
- Confidence threshold: ${mode === 'enterprise' ? 0.95 : mode === 'standard' ? 0.90 : 0.80}
|
|
181
|
+
- Adaptive agent spawning: YES
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
## Next Steps
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
1. Review this plan
|
|
186
|
+
2. Execute CFN Loop:
|
|
187
|
+
\`\`\`bash
|
|
188
|
+
/cfn-loop-cli "$ARGUMENTS" --mode=${mode}
|
|
189
|
+
# OR for debugging:
|
|
190
|
+
/cfn-loop-task "$ARGUMENTS" --mode=${mode}
|
|
191
|
+
\`\`\`
|
|
77
192
|
```
|
|
78
193
|
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
194
|
+
### Step 3: Output Plan
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
```javascript
|
|
197
|
+
const planPath = `planning/PLAN_${sanitize($ARGUMENTS)}.md`;
|
|
198
|
+
Write(planPath, planContent);
|
|
199
|
+
|
|
200
|
+
console.log(`✅ Implementation plan generated: ${planPath}`);
|
|
201
|
+
console.log('');
|
|
202
|
+
console.log('📋 Plan Summary:');
|
|
203
|
+
console.log(`- Complexity: ${complexity}`);
|
|
204
|
+
console.log(`- Loop 3 Agents: ${loop3Agents.length}`);
|
|
205
|
+
console.log(`- Loop 2 Validators: ${loop2Agents.length}`);
|
|
206
|
+
console.log(`- Test Cases: ${testCases.length}`);
|
|
207
|
+
console.log(`- Success Criteria: ${successCriteria.length}`);
|
|
208
|
+
console.log('');
|
|
209
|
+
console.log('Next: Review plan, then execute CFN Loop');
|
|
210
|
+
console.log(`/cfn-loop-cli "$ARGUMENTS" --mode=${mode}`);
|
|
211
|
+
```
|
|
212
|
+
|
|
213
|
+
## Integration with CFN Loop
|
|
214
|
+
|
|
215
|
+
**Workflow:**
|
|
216
|
+
```
|
|
217
|
+
1. /write-plan "Task description" --mode=standard
|
|
218
|
+
↓ Generates planning/PLAN_task.md
|
|
219
|
+
|
|
220
|
+
2. Human reviews plan (optional)
|
|
221
|
+
↓ Approve or request changes
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
3. /cfn-loop-cli "Task description" --mode=standard
|
|
224
|
+
↓ Executes implementation following plan
|
|
225
|
+
|
|
226
|
+
4. CFN Loop autonomously implements following TDD phases
|
|
227
|
+
```
|
|
228
|
+
|
|
229
|
+
## Mode Comparison
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
| Mode | Complexity | Agents | Test Coverage | Use Case |
|
|
232
|
+
|------|------------|--------|---------------|----------|
|
|
233
|
+
| MVP | Low | 3-4 total | ≥70% | Prototypes, proof-of-concept |
|
|
234
|
+
| Standard | Medium | 5-7 total | ≥80% | Production features |
|
|
235
|
+
| Enterprise | High | 8-10 total | ≥90% | Critical systems, compliance |
|
|
236
|
+
|
|
237
|
+
## Example Output
|
|
80
238
|
|
|
81
|
-
### Spawning Plan Creation
|
|
82
|
-
```bash
|
|
83
|
-
/write-plan "Implement JWT Authentication" \
|
|
84
|
-
--epic-context '{"goal":"Secure API access"}' \
|
|
85
|
-
--sprint-context '{"sprint":"Authentication MVP"}' \
|
|
86
|
-
--agents "backend-dev,security-specialist"
|
|
87
239
|
```
|
|
240
|
+
Analyzing task...
|
|
88
241
|
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
242
|
+
✅ Implementation plan generated: planning/PLAN_jwt_authentication.md
|
|
243
|
+
|
|
244
|
+
📋 Plan Summary:
|
|
245
|
+
- Complexity: Standard
|
|
246
|
+
- Loop 3 Agents: 3 (backend-dev, researcher, devops)
|
|
247
|
+
- Loop 2 Validators: 4 (reviewer, tester, architect, security-specialist)
|
|
248
|
+
- Test Cases: 8
|
|
249
|
+
- Success Criteria: 6
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
251
|
+
Next: Review plan, then execute CFN Loop
|
|
252
|
+
/cfn-loop-cli "Implement JWT authentication" --mode=standard
|
|
253
|
+
```
|
|
94
254
|
|
|
95
255
|
## Best Practices
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
-
|
|
99
|
-
-
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
-
|
|
256
|
+
|
|
257
|
+
**When to Use:**
|
|
258
|
+
- ✅ Complex tasks (>3 steps)
|
|
259
|
+
- ✅ Security-critical features
|
|
260
|
+
- ✅ Team collaboration (plan review needed)
|
|
261
|
+
- ✅ Learning CFN Loop workflow
|
|
262
|
+
|
|
263
|
+
**When to Skip:**
|
|
264
|
+
- Simple bug fixes (go straight to /cfn-loop-cli)
|
|
265
|
+
- Urgent hotfixes (no time for planning)
|
|
266
|
+
- Well-understood patterns (agent knows what to do)
|
|
267
|
+
|
|
268
|
+
## Related Commands
|
|
269
|
+
|
|
270
|
+
- **Execute Plan**: `/cfn-loop-cli` (production) or `/cfn-loop-task` (debugging)
|
|
271
|
+
- **Document Results**: `/cfn-loop-document` (after completion)
|
|
272
|
+
|
|
273
|
+
---
|
|
274
|
+
|
|
275
|
+
**Version:** 2.0.0 (2025-10-31) - Integrated with CFN Loop v3 architecture
|