claude-context-plugin 2.1.3 → 2.2.0-final
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +128 -104
- package/agents/context-engineer.md +67 -67
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/context-optimize/SKILL.md +86 -0
- package/skills/implement/SKILL.md +150 -71
- package/skills/plan/SKILL.md +143 -66
- package/skills/research/SKILL.md +103 -43
- package/skills/validate/SKILL.md +62 -62
- package/skills/verify-docs/SKILL.md +77 -77
- package/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +0 -23
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,104 +1,128 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# claude-context-plugin
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
```
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
```
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
-
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
-
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
### /context-eng:
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
```
|
|
64
|
-
/context-eng:
|
|
65
|
-
```
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
-
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
###
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
```
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
```
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
-
|
|
104
|
-
-
|
|
1
|
+
# claude-context-plugin
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
> **⚠️ DEPRECATION NOTICE**
|
|
4
|
+
>
|
|
5
|
+
> This plugin is **deprecated** as of v3.0.0. All skills and commands are now included in the unified [`ai-context`](../ai-context/) package.
|
|
6
|
+
>
|
|
7
|
+
> **Migration:** Use `ai-context` skills and commands directly.
|
|
8
|
+
>
|
|
9
|
+
> **Support:** Use unified package instead
|
|
10
|
+
>
|
|
11
|
+
> ---
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Claude Code plugin for context engineering - RPI workflow and documentation optimization.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Installation
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
### Via Plugin Manager
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
```bash
|
|
20
|
+
/plugin install claude-context-engineering
|
|
21
|
+
```
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
### Via CLI
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
```bash
|
|
26
|
+
npx claude-plugins install claude-context-engineering
|
|
27
|
+
```
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Skills
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
### /context-eng:research
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
Systematic codebase exploration for feature/fix analysis.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
```
|
|
36
|
+
/context-eng:research user-authentication
|
|
37
|
+
```
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
Creates a research document with:
|
|
40
|
+
- Relevant files and line numbers
|
|
41
|
+
- Call chain analysis
|
|
42
|
+
- Dependency mapping
|
|
43
|
+
- Test coverage gaps
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### /context-eng:plan
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
Create implementation blueprint with file:line precision.
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
```
|
|
50
|
+
/context-eng:plan user-authentication
|
|
51
|
+
```
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
Creates a plan document with:
|
|
54
|
+
- Exact file:line modifications
|
|
55
|
+
- Risk assessment
|
|
56
|
+
- Test strategy
|
|
57
|
+
- Rollback plan
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### /context-eng:implement
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
Execute plan with atomic changes and continuous testing.
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
```
|
|
64
|
+
/context-eng:implement user-authentication
|
|
65
|
+
```
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
Follows the golden rule: ONE CHANGE → ONE TEST → ONE COMMIT
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### /context-eng:validate
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
Run complete validation suite.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
```
|
|
74
|
+
/context-eng:validate
|
|
75
|
+
```
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
Checks:
|
|
78
|
+
- Directory structure
|
|
79
|
+
- JSON schemas
|
|
80
|
+
- Markdown links
|
|
81
|
+
- Placeholder completion
|
|
82
|
+
- Line number accuracy
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
### /context-eng:verify-docs
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
Verify documentation line numbers match code.
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
```
|
|
89
|
+
/context-eng:verify-docs path/to/file.py
|
|
90
|
+
```
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
### /context-eng:context-optimize
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
Orchestrate context optimization with interactive scoping.
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
```
|
|
97
|
+
/context-eng:context-optimize
|
|
98
|
+
/context-eng:context-optimize --auto
|
|
99
|
+
/context-eng:context-optimize --scope documentation
|
|
100
|
+
```
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
Generates:
|
|
103
|
+
- Context audit in `.claude/research/active/context-audit_research.md`
|
|
104
|
+
- RPI TODO plan in `.claude/plans/active/context-optimization_plan.md`
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
## Agents
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
### @context-eng:context-engineer
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
Initialize and maintain context engineering documentation.
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
```
|
|
113
|
+
@context-eng:context-engineer "Discover workflows for this codebase"
|
|
114
|
+
```
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
## Requirements
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
- Claude Code v1.0.33+
|
|
119
|
+
- Context engineering setup (use `npx create-universal-ai-context` first)
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
## License
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
MIT
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
## Links
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
- [GitHub](https://github.com/SireJeff/claude-context-engineering-template)
|
|
128
|
+
- [create-universal-ai-context](https://www.npmjs.com/package/create-universal-ai-context)
|
|
@@ -1,67 +1,67 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: context-engineer
|
|
3
|
-
description: Initialize and maintain context engineering documentation for any codebase
|
|
4
|
-
capabilities:
|
|
5
|
-
- Codebase analysis and workflow discovery
|
|
6
|
-
- Documentation generation with file:line references
|
|
7
|
-
- Index creation and maintenance
|
|
8
|
-
- Tech stack detection
|
|
9
|
-
---
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
# Context Engineer Agent
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
I specialize in setting up and maintaining context engineering systems for codebases.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## Primary Functions
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
### 1. Initial Setup
|
|
18
|
-
When asked to initialize or set up context engineering:
|
|
19
|
-
- Analyze codebase structure
|
|
20
|
-
- Detect technology stack
|
|
21
|
-
- Discover major workflows (8-15)
|
|
22
|
-
- Create workflow documentation with file:line references
|
|
23
|
-
- Build index hierarchy
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
### 2. Workflow Discovery
|
|
26
|
-
When asked to discover or find workflows:
|
|
27
|
-
- Scan for entry points (API routes, CLI commands, event handlers)
|
|
28
|
-
- Trace call chains 3 levels deep
|
|
29
|
-
- Document in `.claude/context/workflows/`
|
|
30
|
-
- Update `WORKFLOW_INDEX.md`
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
### 3. Re-indexing
|
|
33
|
-
When asked to re-scan or update indexes:
|
|
34
|
-
- Find new or changed files
|
|
35
|
-
- Update line numbers in documentation
|
|
36
|
-
- Add new workflows if discovered
|
|
37
|
-
- Validate existing references
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
### 4. Documentation Maintenance
|
|
40
|
-
When documentation drift is detected:
|
|
41
|
-
- Update line numbers
|
|
42
|
-
- Fix broken references
|
|
43
|
-
- Add missing workflows
|
|
44
|
-
- Archive outdated docs
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
## Output Format
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
All documentation follows these standards:
|
|
49
|
-
- File references: `path/to/file.py:123`
|
|
50
|
-
- Line ranges: `file.py:100-150`
|
|
51
|
-
- Markdown tables for structured data
|
|
52
|
-
- Mermaid diagrams for flows
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
## Context Budget
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
- Initial setup: 40-50% utilization
|
|
57
|
-
- Re-indexing: 20-30% utilization
|
|
58
|
-
- Maintenance: 15-20% utilization
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
## Example Invocations
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
```
|
|
63
|
-
@context-engineer "Initialize context engineering for this repository"
|
|
64
|
-
@context-engineer "Discover workflows for the authentication module"
|
|
65
|
-
@context-engineer "Re-scan and update indexes for recent changes"
|
|
66
|
-
@context-engineer "Update line numbers in workflow documentation"
|
|
67
|
-
```
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: context-engineer
|
|
3
|
+
description: Initialize and maintain context engineering documentation for any codebase
|
|
4
|
+
capabilities:
|
|
5
|
+
- Codebase analysis and workflow discovery
|
|
6
|
+
- Documentation generation with file:line references
|
|
7
|
+
- Index creation and maintenance
|
|
8
|
+
- Tech stack detection
|
|
9
|
+
---
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
# Context Engineer Agent
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
I specialize in setting up and maintaining context engineering systems for codebases.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Primary Functions
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
### 1. Initial Setup
|
|
18
|
+
When asked to initialize or set up context engineering:
|
|
19
|
+
- Analyze codebase structure
|
|
20
|
+
- Detect technology stack
|
|
21
|
+
- Discover major workflows (8-15)
|
|
22
|
+
- Create workflow documentation with file:line references
|
|
23
|
+
- Build index hierarchy
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
### 2. Workflow Discovery
|
|
26
|
+
When asked to discover or find workflows:
|
|
27
|
+
- Scan for entry points (API routes, CLI commands, event handlers)
|
|
28
|
+
- Trace call chains 3 levels deep
|
|
29
|
+
- Document in `.claude/context/workflows/`
|
|
30
|
+
- Update `WORKFLOW_INDEX.md`
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### 3. Re-indexing
|
|
33
|
+
When asked to re-scan or update indexes:
|
|
34
|
+
- Find new or changed files
|
|
35
|
+
- Update line numbers in documentation
|
|
36
|
+
- Add new workflows if discovered
|
|
37
|
+
- Validate existing references
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
### 4. Documentation Maintenance
|
|
40
|
+
When documentation drift is detected:
|
|
41
|
+
- Update line numbers
|
|
42
|
+
- Fix broken references
|
|
43
|
+
- Add missing workflows
|
|
44
|
+
- Archive outdated docs
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
## Output Format
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
All documentation follows these standards:
|
|
49
|
+
- File references: `path/to/file.py:123`
|
|
50
|
+
- Line ranges: `file.py:100-150`
|
|
51
|
+
- Markdown tables for structured data
|
|
52
|
+
- Mermaid diagrams for flows
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
## Context Budget
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- Initial setup: 40-50% utilization
|
|
57
|
+
- Re-indexing: 20-30% utilization
|
|
58
|
+
- Maintenance: 15-20% utilization
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
## Example Invocations
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
@context-engineer "Initialize context engineering for this repository"
|
|
64
|
+
@context-engineer "Discover workflows for the authentication module"
|
|
65
|
+
@context-engineer "Re-scan and update indexes for recent changes"
|
|
66
|
+
@context-engineer "Update line numbers in workflow documentation"
|
|
67
|
+
```
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Context Optimization - Orchestrate RPI workflow TODO generation with interactive scoping
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Context Engineering: Optimization Orchestrator
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
When invoked, orchestrate context engineering optimization with interactive scoping:
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Process
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
1. **Interactive Scoping (if no --auto flag)**
|
|
12
|
+
- Ask up to 4 multiple choice questions to define scope
|
|
13
|
+
- Questions cover: optimization focus, codebase areas, enhancement types, priority order
|
|
14
|
+
- Skip questions if --scope or --auto flag provided
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
2. **Context System Audit**
|
|
17
|
+
- Analyze `.claude/` directory structure
|
|
18
|
+
- Check workflow file coverage and accuracy
|
|
19
|
+
- Verify index file completeness
|
|
20
|
+
- Identify orphaned or outdated files
|
|
21
|
+
- Assess agent and command coverage gaps
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
3. **Generate RPI TODO List**
|
|
24
|
+
- Create actionable TODO with research, plan, implement phases
|
|
25
|
+
- Save to `.claude/plans/active/context-optimization_plan.md`
|
|
26
|
+
- Include specific commands for each task
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
4. **Redundant File Detection**
|
|
29
|
+
- Find files not referenced by any index
|
|
30
|
+
- Identify duplicate or overlapping content
|
|
31
|
+
- Flag outdated files with stale line references
|
|
32
|
+
- Report empty placeholder files
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
5. **Enhancement Recommendations**
|
|
35
|
+
- Suggest new specialized agents based on codebase patterns
|
|
36
|
+
- Recommend workflow commands for common tasks
|
|
37
|
+
- Identify undocumented workflows needing documentation
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
## Scoping Questions (Max 4)
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
**Q1: Optimization Focus**
|
|
42
|
+
- A) Functionalize the entire context engineering system
|
|
43
|
+
- B) Update outdated documentation and line references
|
|
44
|
+
- C) Identify and remove redundant context files
|
|
45
|
+
- D) Discover enhancement opportunities (new agents/commands)
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
**Q2: Codebase Coverage**
|
|
48
|
+
- A) Core business logic
|
|
49
|
+
- B) API/External integrations
|
|
50
|
+
- C) Database/Data layer
|
|
51
|
+
- D) All areas equally
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**Q3: Enhancement Preferences**
|
|
54
|
+
- A) New specialized agents for specific domains
|
|
55
|
+
- B) New workflow commands for common tasks
|
|
56
|
+
- C) Improved documentation structure
|
|
57
|
+
- D) Better cross-referencing and navigation
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
**Q4: TODO Priority Order**
|
|
60
|
+
- A) Quick wins first (< 30 min each)
|
|
61
|
+
- B) High impact first (regardless of effort)
|
|
62
|
+
- C) By workflow area (grouped logically)
|
|
63
|
+
- D) By dependency order (foundational first)
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
## Context Budget
|
|
66
|
+
- Target: 20% of 200k tokens (40k)
|
|
67
|
+
- Output: TODO checklist + recommendations
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
## Output
|
|
70
|
+
- TODO checklist saved to `.claude/plans/active/context-optimization_plan.md`
|
|
71
|
+
- Audit findings in `.claude/research/active/context-audit_research.md`
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
## Arguments
|
|
74
|
+
- `$ARGUMENTS` can include:
|
|
75
|
+
- `--auto` - Use intelligent defaults, skip questions
|
|
76
|
+
- `--scope documentation` - Focus on docs only
|
|
77
|
+
- `--scope agents` - Focus on agent gaps
|
|
78
|
+
- `--scope workflows` - Focus on workflow coverage
|
|
79
|
+
- `--scope cleanup` - Focus on redundant file removal
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
## Next Steps
|
|
82
|
+
After completion, execute the generated TODO list:
|
|
83
|
+
1. `/rpi-research [first-research-task]`
|
|
84
|
+
2. `/rpi-plan [first-plan-task]`
|
|
85
|
+
3. `/rpi-implement [first-impl-task]`
|
|
86
|
+
4. `/validate-all`
|
|
@@ -1,71 +1,150 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
description: RPI Implement Phase - Execute
|
|
3
|
-
---
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
# Context Engineering: Implement Phase
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
When invoked, execute the approved implementation plan:
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
##
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
##
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
-
|
|
61
|
-
-
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
-
|
|
68
|
-
-
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: RPI Implement Phase - Execute chunk-based todolists with atomic changes and continuous testing
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Context Engineering: Implement Phase (Enhanced)
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
When invoked, execute the approved implementation plan chunk by chunk:
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Key Innovation: Inter-Phase Awareness
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
This implement phase **KNOWS**:
|
|
12
|
+
- RPI-Plan structured chunks for atomic implementation
|
|
13
|
+
- Each CHUNK-Pn contains a complete, ordered todolist
|
|
14
|
+
- Chunk dependencies dictate execution order
|
|
15
|
+
- Marking chunks complete updates both plan AND research documents
|
|
16
|
+
- Context reset is needed after every 3 chunks or 35% utilization
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Prerequisites
|
|
19
|
+
- Approved plan at `.claude/plans/active/[feature]_plan.md`
|
|
20
|
+
- Plan contains chunk manifest with chunk-todolists
|
|
21
|
+
- If not found, run `/context-eng:plan $ARGUMENTS` first
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Golden Rules
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
```
|
|
26
|
+
ONE CHUNK → COMPLETE TODOLIST → MARK DONE → NEXT CHUNK
|
|
27
|
+
ONE TODO → ONE CHANGE → ONE TEST → ONE COMMIT
|
|
28
|
+
```
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Chunk-Based Implementation Loop
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
```
|
|
33
|
+
FOR each CHUNK-Pn in dependency_order:
|
|
34
|
+
IF dependencies_complete:
|
|
35
|
+
1. Load CHUNK-Pn todolist
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
FOR each TODO in todolist:
|
|
38
|
+
a. Make atomic change
|
|
39
|
+
b. Run todo-specific test
|
|
40
|
+
c. If PASS: commit, mark TODO ✅
|
|
41
|
+
d. If FAIL: STOP, investigate, fix
|
|
42
|
+
END TODO LOOP
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
2. Update chunk documentation
|
|
45
|
+
3. Mark CHUNK-Pn as IMPLEMENTED
|
|
46
|
+
4. Update research CHUNK-Rn to IMPLEMENTED
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
IF chunks_processed % 3 == 0 OR context > 35%:
|
|
49
|
+
Context reset (save progress, reload plan)
|
|
50
|
+
END IF
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
5. Proceed to next ready chunk
|
|
53
|
+
END IF
|
|
54
|
+
END CHUNK LOOP
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
## Process
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
1. **Load Plan Document**
|
|
60
|
+
- Read `.claude/plans/active/[feature]_plan.md`
|
|
61
|
+
- Extract chunk manifest and dependency graph
|
|
62
|
+
- Verify plan status is APPROVED
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
2. **Determine Execution Order**
|
|
65
|
+
Based on chunk dependency graph:
|
|
66
|
+
- Independent chunks first (parallel capable)
|
|
67
|
+
- Dependent chunks in order
|
|
68
|
+
- Final chunks (e.g., test additions)
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
3. **For Each Chunk (in dependency order):**
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
a. **Check dependencies complete**
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
b. **Execute each todo atomically:**
|
|
75
|
+
- Make single change
|
|
76
|
+
- Run specified test
|
|
77
|
+
- If pass: commit with message
|
|
78
|
+
- If fail: STOP, investigate, fix
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
c. **After all todos complete:**
|
|
81
|
+
- Mark CHUNK-Pn as IMPLEMENTED
|
|
82
|
+
- Update CHUNK-Rn in research to IMPLEMENTED
|
|
83
|
+
- Commit chunk documentation updates
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
d. **Context management:**
|
|
86
|
+
- After every 3 chunks: reload plan
|
|
87
|
+
- If >35% utilization: save, compact, continue
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
4. **Run Full Test Suite**
|
|
90
|
+
After all chunks complete
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
5. **Documentation Updates (MANDATORY)**
|
|
93
|
+
- Check `CODE_TO_WORKFLOW_MAP.md` for affected workflows
|
|
94
|
+
- Update workflow files with new line numbers
|
|
95
|
+
- Update function signatures if changed
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
6. **Context Reset (Every 3 Chunks)**
|
|
98
|
+
- Update chunk progress in plan
|
|
99
|
+
- Re-read plan document
|
|
100
|
+
- Verify scope alignment
|
|
101
|
+
- Compact if >35% utilization
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
7. **Finalize**
|
|
104
|
+
- Move plan to `.claude/plans/completed/`
|
|
105
|
+
- Move research to `.claude/research/completed/`
|
|
106
|
+
- Run `/context-eng:validate` to verify
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
## Chunk Status Updates
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
### Update Plan Document
|
|
111
|
+
```markdown
|
|
112
|
+
| Chunk | Status | Todos Done | Commit | Research Updated |
|
|
113
|
+
|-------|--------|------------|--------|------------------|
|
|
114
|
+
| P1 | ✅ IMPLEMENTED | 4/4 | abc123 | ✅ R1 |
|
|
115
|
+
| P2 | ▶️ IMPLEMENTING | 2/5 | - | - |
|
|
116
|
+
```
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
### Update Research Document
|
|
119
|
+
Mark each CHUNK-Rn status:
|
|
120
|
+
- FOUND → COMPLETE → PLANNED → **IMPLEMENTED**
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
## Error Handling
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
| Error Type | Response |
|
|
125
|
+
|------------|----------|
|
|
126
|
+
| Syntax Error | STOP. Fix immediately in same todo. |
|
|
127
|
+
| Import Error | Check file paths, verify imports. |
|
|
128
|
+
| Test Failure | Do NOT add more code. Investigate first. |
|
|
129
|
+
| 3+ Failures in chunk | Mark chunk BLOCKED, try next independent chunk. |
|
|
130
|
+
| 3+ Chunks blocked | STOP. Start new session. |
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
## Commit Format
|
|
133
|
+
|
|
134
|
+
Per-todo:
|
|
135
|
+
```
|
|
136
|
+
feat(chunk-Pn): Todo N - description
|
|
137
|
+
Implements: [feature] chunk N
|
|
138
|
+
```
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
Per-chunk completion:
|
|
141
|
+
```
|
|
142
|
+
feat(chunk-Pn): Complete chunk - [domain]
|
|
143
|
+
Completes: CHUNK-Pn, Updates: CHUNK-Rn
|
|
144
|
+
```
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
## Context Budget
|
|
147
|
+
- Plan: 15k tokens
|
|
148
|
+
- Active code (per chunk): ~10k tokens
|
|
149
|
+
- Test results (per chunk): ~5k tokens
|
|
150
|
+
- Max active (3 chunks): ~45k tokens (22.5%)
|
package/skills/plan/SKILL.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,66 +1,143 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
description: RPI Plan Phase - Create
|
|
3
|
-
---
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
# Context Engineering: Plan Phase
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
When invoked, create a detailed implementation plan:
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
##
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
5.
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
##
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
**
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
-
|
|
62
|
-
-
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: RPI Plan Phase - Create chunk-based todolists from research chunks for rpi-implement consumption
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Context Engineering: Plan Phase (Enhanced)
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
When invoked, create a detailed implementation plan with chunk-based todolists:
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Key Innovation: Inter-Phase Awareness
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
This plan phase **KNOWS**:
|
|
12
|
+
- RPI-Research structured chunks specifically for sequential processing
|
|
13
|
+
- RPI-Implement will read each CHUNK-Pn as an atomic implementation unit
|
|
14
|
+
- Each CHUNK-Pn todolist must be independently executable
|
|
15
|
+
- Chunk dependencies must be explicit for proper execution ordering
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## Prerequisites
|
|
18
|
+
- Research document exists at `.claude/research/active/[feature]_research.md`
|
|
19
|
+
- Research document contains chunk manifest
|
|
20
|
+
- If not found, run `/context-eng:research $ARGUMENTS` first
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Chunk Processing Loop
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
```
|
|
25
|
+
FOR each CHUNK-Rn in research_chunks:
|
|
26
|
+
1. Read CHUNK-Rn content
|
|
27
|
+
2. Create CHUNK-Pn todolist:
|
|
28
|
+
- Define atomic action items
|
|
29
|
+
- Specify file:line for each action
|
|
30
|
+
- Assign test for each action
|
|
31
|
+
- Document chunk-specific rollback
|
|
32
|
+
3. Mark CHUNK-Rn status as PLANNED
|
|
33
|
+
4. Define CHUNK-Pn dependencies
|
|
34
|
+
5. Proceed to next CHUNK-R(n+1)
|
|
35
|
+
END LOOP
|
|
36
|
+
```
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
## Process
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
1. **Load Research Document**
|
|
41
|
+
- Read the research document for $ARGUMENTS
|
|
42
|
+
- Extract chunk manifest
|
|
43
|
+
- Extract per-chunk files and line numbers
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
2. **For Each Research Chunk (CHUNK-Rn):**
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
a. **Analyze chunk content:**
|
|
48
|
+
- Files explored with line numbers
|
|
49
|
+
- Code flow analysis
|
|
50
|
+
- Dependencies identified
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
b. **Create CHUNK-Pn todolist:**
|
|
53
|
+
```markdown
|
|
54
|
+
| # | Action | File | Lines | Risk | Test | Status |
|
|
55
|
+
|---|--------|------|-------|------|------|--------|
|
|
56
|
+
| 1 | [Action] | file.ext | XXX | LOW | test_x | ⏳ |
|
|
57
|
+
```
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
c. **Define per-todo details:**
|
|
60
|
+
- Current code snippet
|
|
61
|
+
- Proposed change
|
|
62
|
+
- Test to run after
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
d. **Mark research chunk as PLANNED**
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
e. **Document chunk dependencies**
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
3. **Create Chunk Dependency Graph**
|
|
69
|
+
```
|
|
70
|
+
CHUNK-P1 → CHUNK-P2 → CHUNK-P3
|
|
71
|
+
↓
|
|
72
|
+
CHUNK-P4 CHUNK-P5
|
|
73
|
+
```
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
4. **Generate Inter-Phase Contract**
|
|
76
|
+
```
|
|
77
|
+
EXPECTED_CONSUMER: rpi-implement
|
|
78
|
+
CHUNK_PROCESSING_ORDER: dependency-ordered
|
|
79
|
+
MARK_AS_IMPLEMENTED_WHEN: all chunk todos complete
|
|
80
|
+
UPDATE_RESEARCH_STATUS: true
|
|
81
|
+
```
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
5. **Create Plan Document**
|
|
84
|
+
- Save to `.claude/plans/active/[feature]_plan.md`
|
|
85
|
+
- Include chunk manifest
|
|
86
|
+
- Include per-chunk todolists
|
|
87
|
+
- Include verification checklist
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
## Plan Format (Chunk-Based)
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
```markdown
|
|
92
|
+
# Implementation Plan: [Feature]
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
## Chunk Manifest
|
|
95
|
+
| Chunk ID | From Research | Status | Todos | Dependencies | Ready |
|
|
96
|
+
|----------|---------------|--------|-------|--------------|-------|
|
|
97
|
+
| CHUNK-P1 | CHUNK-R1 | READY | 4 | None | ✅ |
|
|
98
|
+
| CHUNK-P2 | CHUNK-R2 | READY | 5 | CHUNK-P1 | ⏳ |
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
## CHUNK-P1: [Domain] (from CHUNK-R1)
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
**Status:** READY
|
|
103
|
+
**Dependencies:** None
|
|
104
|
+
**Update Research When Complete:** Mark CHUNK-R1 as IMPLEMENTED
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
### Todolist
|
|
107
|
+
| # | Action | File | Lines | Risk | Test | Status |
|
|
108
|
+
|---|--------|------|-------|------|------|--------|
|
|
109
|
+
| 1 | [Action] | file.ext | XXX | LOW | test_x | ⏳ |
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
### Todo 1: [Action Name]
|
|
112
|
+
**File:** path/to/file.ext
|
|
113
|
+
**Lines:** X-Y
|
|
114
|
+
**Current:** [code block]
|
|
115
|
+
**Proposed:** [code block]
|
|
116
|
+
**Test:** [command]
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
### Chunk Completion Criteria
|
|
119
|
+
- [ ] All todos complete
|
|
120
|
+
- [ ] Update CHUNK-R1 status
|
|
121
|
+
- [ ] Proceed to dependent chunks
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
## Inter-Phase Contract
|
|
124
|
+
[contract for rpi-implement]
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
## Rollback (Per Chunk)
|
|
127
|
+
- CHUNK-P1: git revert [hash]
|
|
128
|
+
```
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
## Context Budget
|
|
131
|
+
- Research doc: 20k tokens
|
|
132
|
+
- Plan creation: 15k tokens
|
|
133
|
+
- Total: 35k tokens (17.5%)
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
136
|
+
After approval, run `/context-eng:implement $ARGUMENTS`
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
RPI-Implement will:
|
|
139
|
+
1. Load chunk manifest
|
|
140
|
+
2. Process chunks in dependency order
|
|
141
|
+
3. Execute todos atomically per chunk
|
|
142
|
+
4. Mark chunks as IMPLEMENTED
|
|
143
|
+
5. Update research document status
|
package/skills/research/SKILL.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,43 +1,103 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
description: RPI Research Phase - Systematic codebase exploration
|
|
3
|
-
---
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
# Context Engineering: Research Phase
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
When invoked, perform systematic codebase exploration:
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
##
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
-
|
|
21
|
-
-
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
-
|
|
37
|
-
-
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
##
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: RPI Research Phase - Systematic codebase exploration with parallel agents and chunked output
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Context Engineering: Research Phase (Enhanced)
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
When invoked, perform systematic codebase exploration using parallel agents:
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Key Innovation: Inter-Phase Awareness
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
This research phase **KNOWS** how RPI-Plan will consume its output:
|
|
12
|
+
- Output structured into research chunks (CHUNK-R1, CHUNK-R2, etc.)
|
|
13
|
+
- Each chunk is self-contained with files, dependencies, and status
|
|
14
|
+
- RPI-Plan will create a CHUNK-Pn todolist per CHUNK-Rn
|
|
15
|
+
- Chunk manifest enables sequential processing by RPI-Plan
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## Process
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
1. **Initialize Research Document**
|
|
20
|
+
- Create `.claude/research/active/[feature]_research.md`
|
|
21
|
+
- Use template from `.claude/research/RESEARCH_TEMPLATE.md`
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
2. **Spawn Parallel Agents (3-5 agents)**
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
```
|
|
26
|
+
Agent 1: API/Route Entry Points → CHUNK-R1
|
|
27
|
+
Agent 2: Business Logic & Models → CHUNK-R2
|
|
28
|
+
Agent 3: Database/Storage Layer → CHUNK-R3
|
|
29
|
+
Agent 4: External Integrations → CHUNK-R4
|
|
30
|
+
Agent 5: Test Coverage Analysis → CHUNK-R5
|
|
31
|
+
```
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
Each agent receives:
|
|
34
|
+
- Feature name and objective
|
|
35
|
+
- Assigned domain
|
|
36
|
+
- Required output format (chunk structure)
|
|
37
|
+
- Line number requirement for all file references
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
3. **Per-Agent Chunk Output**
|
|
40
|
+
Each agent produces a self-contained chunk:
|
|
41
|
+
```markdown
|
|
42
|
+
## CHUNK-Rn: [Domain]
|
|
43
|
+
**Status:** COMPLETE
|
|
44
|
+
**Parallel Agent:** Agent N
|
|
45
|
+
**Ready for Planning:** Yes
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
### Files Explored
|
|
48
|
+
| File | Lines | Key Findings |
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
### Code Flow Analysis
|
|
51
|
+
[call chain with file:line refs]
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
### Dependencies (This Chunk)
|
|
54
|
+
- External: [APIs]
|
|
55
|
+
- Internal: [services]
|
|
56
|
+
```
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
4. **Aggregate Chunk Results**
|
|
59
|
+
- Create chunk manifest table
|
|
60
|
+
- Combine all agent outputs
|
|
61
|
+
- Verify all chunks are COMPLETE
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
5. **Generate Inter-Phase Contract**
|
|
64
|
+
```
|
|
65
|
+
EXPECTED_CONSUMER: rpi-plan
|
|
66
|
+
CHUNK_PROCESSING_ORDER: sequential (R1 → R2 → R3 → R4 → R5)
|
|
67
|
+
MARK_AS_PLANNED_WHEN: chunk todolist created
|
|
68
|
+
REQUIRED_OUTPUT: CHUNK-Pn per CHUNK-Rn
|
|
69
|
+
```
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
6. **Generate Summary**
|
|
72
|
+
- 150-word summary for Plan phase
|
|
73
|
+
- Reference key files from each chunk
|
|
74
|
+
- Recommend approach
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
## Chunk Manifest Format (Required)
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
```markdown
|
|
79
|
+
| Chunk ID | Domain | Status | Files | Ready for Planning |
|
|
80
|
+
|----------|--------|--------|-------|-------------------|
|
|
81
|
+
| CHUNK-R1 | API/Routes | COMPLETE | 3 | ✅ |
|
|
82
|
+
| CHUNK-R2 | Business Logic | COMPLETE | 4 | ✅ |
|
|
83
|
+
| CHUNK-R3 | Database | COMPLETE | 2 | ✅ |
|
|
84
|
+
| CHUNK-R4 | External | COMPLETE | 1 | ✅ |
|
|
85
|
+
| CHUNK-R5 | Tests | COMPLETE | 3 | ✅ |
|
|
86
|
+
```
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
## Context Budget
|
|
89
|
+
- Target: 25% of 200k tokens (50k)
|
|
90
|
+
- Per-agent budget: ~10k tokens each
|
|
91
|
+
- Compaction: After each agent returns
|
|
92
|
+
- Final output: ~20k tokens (research doc only)
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
## Output
|
|
95
|
+
Research document saved to `.claude/research/active/` with:
|
|
96
|
+
- Chunk manifest
|
|
97
|
+
- Per-chunk details
|
|
98
|
+
- Inter-phase contract for RPI-Plan
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
101
|
+
After completion, run `/context-eng:plan $ARGUMENTS`
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
RPI-Plan will read chunk manifest and create CHUNK-Pn todolist per CHUNK-Rn
|
package/skills/validate/SKILL.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,62 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
description: Run complete validation suite on context engineering documentation
|
|
3
|
-
---
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
# Context Engineering: Validation
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
Run comprehensive validation on the context engineering setup.
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
## Validation Checks
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
### 1. Structure Validation
|
|
12
|
-
- All required directories exist in `.claude/`
|
|
13
|
-
- Required files are present
|
|
14
|
-
- Settings file is valid JSON
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
### 2. Schema Validation
|
|
17
|
-
- JSON files validate against their schemas
|
|
18
|
-
- Frontmatter in markdown files is valid
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
### 3. Link Validation
|
|
21
|
-
- All internal markdown links resolve
|
|
22
|
-
- No broken references to files or anchors
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
### 4. Placeholder Detection
|
|
25
|
-
- Find remaining `{{PLACEHOLDER}}` values
|
|
26
|
-
- Report files that need manual completion
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
### 5. Line Number Accuracy
|
|
29
|
-
- Sample referenced line numbers in documentation
|
|
30
|
-
- Verify they match actual code
|
|
31
|
-
- Target: ≥60% accuracy
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
## Output
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
```
|
|
36
|
-
Validation Results
|
|
37
|
-
==================
|
|
38
|
-
✓ Structure: PASS (12/12 directories)
|
|
39
|
-
✓ Schemas: PASS (5/5 files valid)
|
|
40
|
-
✓ Links: PASS (45/45 links resolve)
|
|
41
|
-
⚠ Placeholders: WARN (3 remaining in 2 files)
|
|
42
|
-
✓ Line Accuracy: PASS (78% accurate)
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
Overall: PASS with warnings
|
|
45
|
-
```
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
## Usage
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
Run validation:
|
|
50
|
-
- Full suite: `/context-eng:validate`
|
|
51
|
-
- Specific check: `/context-eng:validate --links`
|
|
52
|
-
- With fix: `/context-eng:validate --fix`
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
## Thresholds
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
| Check | Pass | Warn | Fail |
|
|
57
|
-
|-------|------|------|------|
|
|
58
|
-
| Structure | 100% | - | <100% |
|
|
59
|
-
| Schemas | 100% | - | <100% |
|
|
60
|
-
| Links | 100% | <100% | <90% |
|
|
61
|
-
| Placeholders | 0 | 1-5 | >5 |
|
|
62
|
-
| Line Accuracy | ≥60% | 50-60% | <50% |
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Run complete validation suite on context engineering documentation
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Context Engineering: Validation
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Run comprehensive validation on the context engineering setup.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Validation Checks
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
### 1. Structure Validation
|
|
12
|
+
- All required directories exist in `.claude/`
|
|
13
|
+
- Required files are present
|
|
14
|
+
- Settings file is valid JSON
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
### 2. Schema Validation
|
|
17
|
+
- JSON files validate against their schemas
|
|
18
|
+
- Frontmatter in markdown files is valid
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
### 3. Link Validation
|
|
21
|
+
- All internal markdown links resolve
|
|
22
|
+
- No broken references to files or anchors
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
### 4. Placeholder Detection
|
|
25
|
+
- Find remaining `{{PLACEHOLDER}}` values
|
|
26
|
+
- Report files that need manual completion
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
### 5. Line Number Accuracy
|
|
29
|
+
- Sample referenced line numbers in documentation
|
|
30
|
+
- Verify they match actual code
|
|
31
|
+
- Target: ≥60% accuracy
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## Output
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
```
|
|
36
|
+
Validation Results
|
|
37
|
+
==================
|
|
38
|
+
✓ Structure: PASS (12/12 directories)
|
|
39
|
+
✓ Schemas: PASS (5/5 files valid)
|
|
40
|
+
✓ Links: PASS (45/45 links resolve)
|
|
41
|
+
⚠ Placeholders: WARN (3 remaining in 2 files)
|
|
42
|
+
✓ Line Accuracy: PASS (78% accurate)
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
Overall: PASS with warnings
|
|
45
|
+
```
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
## Usage
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
Run validation:
|
|
50
|
+
- Full suite: `/context-eng:validate`
|
|
51
|
+
- Specific check: `/context-eng:validate --links`
|
|
52
|
+
- With fix: `/context-eng:validate --fix`
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
## Thresholds
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
| Check | Pass | Warn | Fail |
|
|
57
|
+
|-------|------|------|------|
|
|
58
|
+
| Structure | 100% | - | <100% |
|
|
59
|
+
| Schemas | 100% | - | <100% |
|
|
60
|
+
| Links | 100% | <100% | <90% |
|
|
61
|
+
| Placeholders | 0 | 1-5 | >5 |
|
|
62
|
+
| Line Accuracy | ≥60% | 50-60% | <50% |
|
|
@@ -1,77 +1,77 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
description: Verify documentation line numbers match current code state
|
|
3
|
-
---
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
# Context Engineering: Verify Documentation
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
Check if documentation line numbers still match the actual code.
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
## Purpose
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
After code changes, line numbers in documentation may drift. This skill:
|
|
12
|
-
1. Finds all `file:line` references in `.claude/` documentation
|
|
13
|
-
2. Verifies the referenced lines exist and match described content
|
|
14
|
-
3. Reports accuracy and suggests fixes
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
## Process
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
1. **Scan Documentation**
|
|
19
|
-
- Find all patterns like `file.py:123` or `[file.py:123]`
|
|
20
|
-
- Extract file path and line number
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
2. **Verify References**
|
|
23
|
-
- Check if file exists
|
|
24
|
-
- Check if line number is within file bounds
|
|
25
|
-
- Sample content to verify it matches description
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
3. **Calculate Accuracy**
|
|
28
|
-
- Total references found
|
|
29
|
-
- Valid references
|
|
30
|
-
- Accuracy percentage
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
4. **Generate Report**
|
|
33
|
-
```
|
|
34
|
-
Documentation Accuracy Report
|
|
35
|
-
=============================
|
|
36
|
-
Total References: 156
|
|
37
|
-
Valid: 142
|
|
38
|
-
Invalid: 14
|
|
39
|
-
Accuracy: 91%
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
Invalid References:
|
|
42
|
-
- context/workflows/auth.md:45 → src/auth.py:230 (line moved to 245)
|
|
43
|
-
- context/workflows/api.md:12 → src/api.py:100 (file renamed)
|
|
44
|
-
```
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
## Usage
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
Check specific file:
|
|
49
|
-
```
|
|
50
|
-
/context-eng:verify-docs path/to/changed/file.py
|
|
51
|
-
```
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
Check all documentation:
|
|
54
|
-
```
|
|
55
|
-
/context-eng:verify-docs
|
|
56
|
-
```
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
Auto-fix (update line numbers):
|
|
59
|
-
```
|
|
60
|
-
/context-eng:verify-docs --fix
|
|
61
|
-
```
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
## Target Accuracy
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
| Level | Accuracy | Action |
|
|
66
|
-
|-------|----------|--------|
|
|
67
|
-
| Excellent | ≥80% | No action needed |
|
|
68
|
-
| Good | 60-80% | Update when convenient |
|
|
69
|
-
| Warning | 40-60% | Update soon |
|
|
70
|
-
| Critical | <40% | Update immediately |
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
## When to Run
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
- After refactoring
|
|
75
|
-
- After adding/removing significant code
|
|
76
|
-
- Before creating a PR
|
|
77
|
-
- Weekly maintenance
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Verify documentation line numbers match current code state
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Context Engineering: Verify Documentation
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Check if documentation line numbers still match the actual code.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Purpose
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
After code changes, line numbers in documentation may drift. This skill:
|
|
12
|
+
1. Finds all `file:line` references in `.claude/` documentation
|
|
13
|
+
2. Verifies the referenced lines exist and match described content
|
|
14
|
+
3. Reports accuracy and suggests fixes
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
## Process
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
1. **Scan Documentation**
|
|
19
|
+
- Find all patterns like `file.py:123` or `[file.py:123]`
|
|
20
|
+
- Extract file path and line number
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
2. **Verify References**
|
|
23
|
+
- Check if file exists
|
|
24
|
+
- Check if line number is within file bounds
|
|
25
|
+
- Sample content to verify it matches description
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
3. **Calculate Accuracy**
|
|
28
|
+
- Total references found
|
|
29
|
+
- Valid references
|
|
30
|
+
- Accuracy percentage
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
4. **Generate Report**
|
|
33
|
+
```
|
|
34
|
+
Documentation Accuracy Report
|
|
35
|
+
=============================
|
|
36
|
+
Total References: 156
|
|
37
|
+
Valid: 142
|
|
38
|
+
Invalid: 14
|
|
39
|
+
Accuracy: 91%
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
Invalid References:
|
|
42
|
+
- context/workflows/auth.md:45 → src/auth.py:230 (line moved to 245)
|
|
43
|
+
- context/workflows/api.md:12 → src/api.py:100 (file renamed)
|
|
44
|
+
```
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
## Usage
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
Check specific file:
|
|
49
|
+
```
|
|
50
|
+
/context-eng:verify-docs path/to/changed/file.py
|
|
51
|
+
```
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
Check all documentation:
|
|
54
|
+
```
|
|
55
|
+
/context-eng:verify-docs
|
|
56
|
+
```
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
Auto-fix (update line numbers):
|
|
59
|
+
```
|
|
60
|
+
/context-eng:verify-docs --fix
|
|
61
|
+
```
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
## Target Accuracy
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
| Level | Accuracy | Action |
|
|
66
|
+
|-------|----------|--------|
|
|
67
|
+
| Excellent | ≥80% | No action needed |
|
|
68
|
+
| Good | 60-80% | Update when convenient |
|
|
69
|
+
| Warning | 40-60% | Update soon |
|
|
70
|
+
| Critical | <40% | Update immediately |
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
## When to Run
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
- After refactoring
|
|
75
|
+
- After adding/removing significant code
|
|
76
|
+
- Before creating a PR
|
|
77
|
+
- Weekly maintenance
|
|
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
{
|
|
2
|
-
"name": "claude-context-engineering",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "1.0.0",
|
|
4
|
-
"displayName": "Context Engineering",
|
|
5
|
-
"description": "RPI workflow and context optimization for Claude Code - Research, Plan, Implement with file:line precision",
|
|
6
|
-
"author": {
|
|
7
|
-
"name": "SireJeff"
|
|
8
|
-
},
|
|
9
|
-
"license": "MIT",
|
|
10
|
-
"repository": {
|
|
11
|
-
"type": "git",
|
|
12
|
-
"url": "https://github.com/SireJeff/claude-context-engineering-template"
|
|
13
|
-
},
|
|
14
|
-
"keywords": [
|
|
15
|
-
"context-engineering",
|
|
16
|
-
"rpi-workflow",
|
|
17
|
-
"documentation",
|
|
18
|
-
"productivity"
|
|
19
|
-
],
|
|
20
|
-
"claudeCode": {
|
|
21
|
-
"minVersion": "1.0.33"
|
|
22
|
-
}
|
|
23
|
-
}
|