claude-context-plugin 1.0.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
1
+ {
2
+ "name": "claude-context-engineering",
3
+ "version": "1.0.0",
4
+ "displayName": "Context Engineering",
5
+ "description": "RPI workflow and context optimization for Claude Code - Research, Plan, Implement with file:line precision",
6
+ "author": {
7
+ "name": "SireJeff"
8
+ },
9
+ "license": "MIT",
10
+ "repository": {
11
+ "type": "git",
12
+ "url": "https://github.com/SireJeff/claude-context-engineering-template"
13
+ },
14
+ "keywords": [
15
+ "context-engineering",
16
+ "rpi-workflow",
17
+ "documentation",
18
+ "productivity"
19
+ ],
20
+ "claudeCode": {
21
+ "minVersion": "1.0.33"
22
+ }
23
+ }
package/README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
1
+ # claude-context-plugin
2
+
3
+ Claude Code plugin for context engineering - RPI workflow and documentation optimization.
4
+
5
+ ## Installation
6
+
7
+ ### Via Plugin Manager
8
+
9
+ ```bash
10
+ /plugin install claude-context-engineering
11
+ ```
12
+
13
+ ### Via CLI
14
+
15
+ ```bash
16
+ npx claude-plugins install claude-context-engineering
17
+ ```
18
+
19
+ ## Skills
20
+
21
+ ### /context-eng:research
22
+
23
+ Systematic codebase exploration for feature/fix analysis.
24
+
25
+ ```
26
+ /context-eng:research user-authentication
27
+ ```
28
+
29
+ Creates a research document with:
30
+ - Relevant files and line numbers
31
+ - Call chain analysis
32
+ - Dependency mapping
33
+ - Test coverage gaps
34
+
35
+ ### /context-eng:plan
36
+
37
+ Create implementation blueprint with file:line precision.
38
+
39
+ ```
40
+ /context-eng:plan user-authentication
41
+ ```
42
+
43
+ Creates a plan document with:
44
+ - Exact file:line modifications
45
+ - Risk assessment
46
+ - Test strategy
47
+ - Rollback plan
48
+
49
+ ### /context-eng:implement
50
+
51
+ Execute plan with atomic changes and continuous testing.
52
+
53
+ ```
54
+ /context-eng:implement user-authentication
55
+ ```
56
+
57
+ Follows the golden rule: ONE CHANGE → ONE TEST → ONE COMMIT
58
+
59
+ ### /context-eng:validate
60
+
61
+ Run complete validation suite.
62
+
63
+ ```
64
+ /context-eng:validate
65
+ ```
66
+
67
+ Checks:
68
+ - Directory structure
69
+ - JSON schemas
70
+ - Markdown links
71
+ - Placeholder completion
72
+ - Line number accuracy
73
+
74
+ ### /context-eng:verify-docs
75
+
76
+ Verify documentation line numbers match code.
77
+
78
+ ```
79
+ /context-eng:verify-docs path/to/file.py
80
+ ```
81
+
82
+ ## Agents
83
+
84
+ ### @context-eng:context-engineer
85
+
86
+ Initialize and maintain context engineering documentation.
87
+
88
+ ```
89
+ @context-eng:context-engineer "Discover workflows for this codebase"
90
+ ```
91
+
92
+ ## Requirements
93
+
94
+ - Claude Code v1.0.33+
95
+ - Context engineering setup (use `npx create-claude-context` first)
96
+
97
+ ## License
98
+
99
+ MIT
100
+
101
+ ## Links
102
+
103
+ - [GitHub](https://github.com/SireJeff/claude-context-engineering-template)
104
+ - [create-claude-context](https://www.npmjs.com/package/create-claude-context)
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: context-engineer
3
+ description: Initialize and maintain context engineering documentation for any codebase
4
+ capabilities:
5
+ - Codebase analysis and workflow discovery
6
+ - Documentation generation with file:line references
7
+ - Index creation and maintenance
8
+ - Tech stack detection
9
+ ---
10
+
11
+ # Context Engineer Agent
12
+
13
+ I specialize in setting up and maintaining context engineering systems for codebases.
14
+
15
+ ## Primary Functions
16
+
17
+ ### 1. Initial Setup
18
+ When asked to initialize or set up context engineering:
19
+ - Analyze codebase structure
20
+ - Detect technology stack
21
+ - Discover major workflows (8-15)
22
+ - Create workflow documentation with file:line references
23
+ - Build index hierarchy
24
+
25
+ ### 2. Workflow Discovery
26
+ When asked to discover or find workflows:
27
+ - Scan for entry points (API routes, CLI commands, event handlers)
28
+ - Trace call chains 3 levels deep
29
+ - Document in `.claude/context/workflows/`
30
+ - Update `WORKFLOW_INDEX.md`
31
+
32
+ ### 3. Re-indexing
33
+ When asked to re-scan or update indexes:
34
+ - Find new or changed files
35
+ - Update line numbers in documentation
36
+ - Add new workflows if discovered
37
+ - Validate existing references
38
+
39
+ ### 4. Documentation Maintenance
40
+ When documentation drift is detected:
41
+ - Update line numbers
42
+ - Fix broken references
43
+ - Add missing workflows
44
+ - Archive outdated docs
45
+
46
+ ## Output Format
47
+
48
+ All documentation follows these standards:
49
+ - File references: `path/to/file.py:123`
50
+ - Line ranges: `file.py:100-150`
51
+ - Markdown tables for structured data
52
+ - Mermaid diagrams for flows
53
+
54
+ ## Context Budget
55
+
56
+ - Initial setup: 40-50% utilization
57
+ - Re-indexing: 20-30% utilization
58
+ - Maintenance: 15-20% utilization
59
+
60
+ ## Example Invocations
61
+
62
+ ```
63
+ @context-engineer "Initialize context engineering for this repository"
64
+ @context-engineer "Discover workflows for the authentication module"
65
+ @context-engineer "Re-scan and update indexes for recent changes"
66
+ @context-engineer "Update line numbers in workflow documentation"
67
+ ```
package/package.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1
+ {
2
+ "name": "claude-context-plugin",
3
+ "version": "1.0.0",
4
+ "description": "Claude Code plugin for context engineering - RPI workflow and documentation optimization",
5
+ "keywords": [
6
+ "claude-code",
7
+ "plugin",
8
+ "context-engineering",
9
+ "rpi-workflow",
10
+ "documentation"
11
+ ],
12
+ "author": "SireJeff",
13
+ "license": "MIT",
14
+ "repository": {
15
+ "type": "git",
16
+ "url": "git+https://github.com/SireJeff/claude-context-engineering-template.git",
17
+ "directory": "packages/claude-context-plugin"
18
+ },
19
+ "bugs": {
20
+ "url": "https://github.com/SireJeff/claude-context-engineering-template/issues"
21
+ },
22
+ "homepage": "https://github.com/SireJeff/claude-context-engineering-template#readme",
23
+ "files": [
24
+ ".claude-plugin/",
25
+ "skills/",
26
+ "agents/",
27
+ "README.md"
28
+ ],
29
+ "peerDependencies": {
30
+ "claude-code": ">=1.0.33"
31
+ }
32
+ }
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ description: RPI Implement Phase - Execute plan with atomic changes and continuous testing
3
+ ---
4
+
5
+ # Context Engineering: Implement Phase
6
+
7
+ When invoked, execute the approved implementation plan:
8
+
9
+ ## Prerequisites
10
+ - Approved plan at `.claude/plans/active/[feature]_plan.md`
11
+ - If not found, run `/context-eng:plan $ARGUMENTS` first
12
+
13
+ ## Golden Rule
14
+
15
+ ```
16
+ ONE CHANGE → ONE TEST → ONE COMMIT
17
+ ```
18
+
19
+ ## Process
20
+
21
+ 1. **Load Plan Document**
22
+ - Read `.claude/plans/active/[feature]_plan.md`
23
+ - Verify plan status is APPROVED
24
+
25
+ 2. **For Each Step in Plan:**
26
+ a. Make the single, atomic change
27
+ b. Run the specified test immediately
28
+ c. If test passes: commit with descriptive message
29
+ d. If test fails: STOP, investigate, fix before proceeding
30
+ e. Update documentation if needed
31
+
32
+ 3. **Documentation Updates (MANDATORY)**
33
+ - Check `CODE_TO_WORKFLOW_MAP.md` for affected workflows
34
+ - Update workflow files with new line numbers
35
+ - Update function signatures if changed
36
+
37
+ 4. **Context Reset (Every 3 Steps)**
38
+ - Update progress checklist in plan
39
+ - Re-read plan document
40
+ - Verify scope alignment
41
+ - Compact if >35% utilization
42
+
43
+ 5. **Finalize**
44
+ - Move plan to `.claude/plans/completed/`
45
+ - Move research to `.claude/research/completed/`
46
+ - Run `/context-eng:validate` to verify
47
+
48
+ ## Error Handling
49
+
50
+ | Error Type | Response |
51
+ |------------|----------|
52
+ | Syntax Error | STOP. Fix immediately. |
53
+ | Import Error | Check file paths, verify imports. |
54
+ | Test Failure | Do NOT add more code. Investigate first. |
55
+ | 3+ Failures | STOP. Start new session. |
56
+
57
+ ## Context Budget
58
+ - Plan: 15k tokens
59
+ - Active code: 30k tokens
60
+ - Test results: 15k tokens
61
+ - Total: 60k tokens (30%)
62
+
63
+ ## Commit Format
64
+ ```
65
+ feat/fix/refactor(scope): description
66
+
67
+ - Detail 1
68
+ - Detail 2
69
+
70
+ Implements: [feature]
71
+ ```
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ description: RPI Plan Phase - Create implementation blueprint with file:line precision
3
+ ---
4
+
5
+ # Context Engineering: Plan Phase
6
+
7
+ When invoked, create a detailed implementation plan:
8
+
9
+ ## Prerequisites
10
+ - Research document exists at `.claude/research/active/[feature]_research.md`
11
+ - If not found, run `/context-eng:research $ARGUMENTS` first
12
+
13
+ ## Process
14
+
15
+ 1. **Load Research Document**
16
+ - Read the research document for $ARGUMENTS
17
+ - Extract relevant files and line numbers
18
+
19
+ 2. **Design Implementation**
20
+ - For each change required:
21
+ - Specify exact file and line numbers
22
+ - Show current code snippet
23
+ - Show proposed change
24
+ - Assign risk level (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH)
25
+
26
+ 3. **Plan Test Strategy**
27
+ - Identify which tests to run after each change
28
+ - Note any new tests needed
29
+
30
+ 4. **Document Rollback Plan**
31
+ - Safe commit to revert to
32
+ - Commands to undo changes
33
+
34
+ 5. **Create Plan Document**
35
+ - Save to `.claude/plans/active/[feature]_plan.md`
36
+ - Include verification checklist
37
+
38
+ ## Plan Format
39
+
40
+ ```markdown
41
+ # Implementation Plan: [Feature]
42
+
43
+ ## Files to Modify
44
+ | File | Lines | Change | Risk |
45
+ |------|-------|--------|------|
46
+
47
+ ## Step-by-Step
48
+ ### Step 1: [Action]
49
+ **File:** path/to/file.ext
50
+ **Lines:** X-Y
51
+ **Current:** [code block]
52
+ **Proposed:** [code block]
53
+ **Test:** [command]
54
+
55
+ ## Rollback
56
+ - Safe commit: [hash]
57
+ - Command: git revert HEAD
58
+ ```
59
+
60
+ ## Context Budget
61
+ - Research doc: 20k tokens
62
+ - Plan creation: 15k tokens
63
+ - Total: 35k tokens (17.5%)
64
+
65
+ ## Next Step
66
+ After approval, run `/context-eng:implement $ARGUMENTS`
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ description: RPI Research Phase - Systematic codebase exploration for feature/fix analysis
3
+ ---
4
+
5
+ # Context Engineering: Research Phase
6
+
7
+ When invoked, perform systematic codebase exploration:
8
+
9
+ ## Process
10
+
11
+ 1. **Initialize Research Document**
12
+ - Create `.claude/research/active/[feature]_research.md`
13
+ - Use template from `.claude/research/RESEARCH_TEMPLATE.md`
14
+
15
+ 2. **Entry Point Discovery**
16
+ - Search for API routes, CLI commands, event handlers related to $ARGUMENTS
17
+ - Use parallel exploration for efficiency (up to 3 agents)
18
+
19
+ 3. **Call Chain Tracing**
20
+ - Trace 3 levels deep from entry points
21
+ - Record exact file:line references for each function
22
+
23
+ 4. **Dependency Mapping**
24
+ - Internal: services, models, utilities used
25
+ - External: APIs, databases, third-party services
26
+
27
+ 5. **Test Coverage Analysis**
28
+ - Find existing tests for affected code
29
+ - Identify coverage gaps
30
+
31
+ 6. **Generate Summary**
32
+ - 150-word summary for Plan phase
33
+ - List 3-20 relevant files with line numbers
34
+
35
+ ## Context Budget
36
+ - Target: 25% of 200k tokens (50k)
37
+ - Final output: ~20k tokens (research doc only)
38
+
39
+ ## Output
40
+ Research document saved to `.claude/research/active/`
41
+
42
+ ## Next Step
43
+ After completion, run `/context-eng:plan $ARGUMENTS`
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ description: Run complete validation suite on context engineering documentation
3
+ ---
4
+
5
+ # Context Engineering: Validation
6
+
7
+ Run comprehensive validation on the context engineering setup.
8
+
9
+ ## Validation Checks
10
+
11
+ ### 1. Structure Validation
12
+ - All required directories exist in `.claude/`
13
+ - Required files are present
14
+ - Settings file is valid JSON
15
+
16
+ ### 2. Schema Validation
17
+ - JSON files validate against their schemas
18
+ - Frontmatter in markdown files is valid
19
+
20
+ ### 3. Link Validation
21
+ - All internal markdown links resolve
22
+ - No broken references to files or anchors
23
+
24
+ ### 4. Placeholder Detection
25
+ - Find remaining `{{PLACEHOLDER}}` values
26
+ - Report files that need manual completion
27
+
28
+ ### 5. Line Number Accuracy
29
+ - Sample referenced line numbers in documentation
30
+ - Verify they match actual code
31
+ - Target: ≥60% accuracy
32
+
33
+ ## Output
34
+
35
+ ```
36
+ Validation Results
37
+ ==================
38
+ ✓ Structure: PASS (12/12 directories)
39
+ ✓ Schemas: PASS (5/5 files valid)
40
+ ✓ Links: PASS (45/45 links resolve)
41
+ ⚠ Placeholders: WARN (3 remaining in 2 files)
42
+ ✓ Line Accuracy: PASS (78% accurate)
43
+
44
+ Overall: PASS with warnings
45
+ ```
46
+
47
+ ## Usage
48
+
49
+ Run validation:
50
+ - Full suite: `/context-eng:validate`
51
+ - Specific check: `/context-eng:validate --links`
52
+ - With fix: `/context-eng:validate --fix`
53
+
54
+ ## Thresholds
55
+
56
+ | Check | Pass | Warn | Fail |
57
+ |-------|------|------|------|
58
+ | Structure | 100% | - | <100% |
59
+ | Schemas | 100% | - | <100% |
60
+ | Links | 100% | <100% | <90% |
61
+ | Placeholders | 0 | 1-5 | >5 |
62
+ | Line Accuracy | ≥60% | 50-60% | <50% |
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ description: Verify documentation line numbers match current code state
3
+ ---
4
+
5
+ # Context Engineering: Verify Documentation
6
+
7
+ Check if documentation line numbers still match the actual code.
8
+
9
+ ## Purpose
10
+
11
+ After code changes, line numbers in documentation may drift. This skill:
12
+ 1. Finds all `file:line` references in `.claude/` documentation
13
+ 2. Verifies the referenced lines exist and match described content
14
+ 3. Reports accuracy and suggests fixes
15
+
16
+ ## Process
17
+
18
+ 1. **Scan Documentation**
19
+ - Find all patterns like `file.py:123` or `[file.py:123]`
20
+ - Extract file path and line number
21
+
22
+ 2. **Verify References**
23
+ - Check if file exists
24
+ - Check if line number is within file bounds
25
+ - Sample content to verify it matches description
26
+
27
+ 3. **Calculate Accuracy**
28
+ - Total references found
29
+ - Valid references
30
+ - Accuracy percentage
31
+
32
+ 4. **Generate Report**
33
+ ```
34
+ Documentation Accuracy Report
35
+ =============================
36
+ Total References: 156
37
+ Valid: 142
38
+ Invalid: 14
39
+ Accuracy: 91%
40
+
41
+ Invalid References:
42
+ - context/workflows/auth.md:45 → src/auth.py:230 (line moved to 245)
43
+ - context/workflows/api.md:12 → src/api.py:100 (file renamed)
44
+ ```
45
+
46
+ ## Usage
47
+
48
+ Check specific file:
49
+ ```
50
+ /context-eng:verify-docs path/to/changed/file.py
51
+ ```
52
+
53
+ Check all documentation:
54
+ ```
55
+ /context-eng:verify-docs
56
+ ```
57
+
58
+ Auto-fix (update line numbers):
59
+ ```
60
+ /context-eng:verify-docs --fix
61
+ ```
62
+
63
+ ## Target Accuracy
64
+
65
+ | Level | Accuracy | Action |
66
+ |-------|----------|--------|
67
+ | Excellent | ≥80% | No action needed |
68
+ | Good | 60-80% | Update when convenient |
69
+ | Warning | 40-60% | Update soon |
70
+ | Critical | <40% | Update immediately |
71
+
72
+ ## When to Run
73
+
74
+ - After refactoring
75
+ - After adding/removing significant code
76
+ - Before creating a PR
77
+ - Weekly maintenance