claude-code-workflow 7.2.29 → 7.2.30

package/.claude/skills/ccw-chain/phases/workflow-execute/phases/06-review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+# Phase 6: Post-Implementation Review
+
+Optional specialized review for completed implementations. In the standard workflow, **passing tests = approved code**. This phase executes only when user selects "Enter Review" in Phase 5 completion.
+
+## Objective
+
+- Perform specialized review (security/architecture/quality/action-items) on completed implementation
+- Generate structured review report with severity levels and action items
+- Provide CLI-assisted analysis using Gemini/Qwen for deep review
+
+## Philosophy: "Tests Are the Review"
+
+- **Default**: All tests pass → Code approved
+- **Optional**: This phase for specialized reviews:
+  - Security audits (vulnerabilities, auth/authz)
+  - Architecture compliance (patterns, technical debt)
+  - Action items verification (requirements met, acceptance criteria)
+  - Code quality assessment (best practices, maintainability)
+
+## Review Types
+
+| Type | Focus | Use Case |
+|------|-------|----------|
+| `quality` | Code quality, best practices, maintainability | Default general review |
+| `security` | Security vulnerabilities, data handling, access control | Security audits |
+| `architecture` | Architectural patterns, technical debt, design decisions | Architecture compliance |
+| `action-items` | Requirements met, acceptance criteria verified | Pre-deployment verification |
+
+**Notes**:
+- For CLAUDE.md updates, use `memory-manage` skill
+
+## Execution
+
+### Step 6.1: Review Type Selection
+
+Prompt user to select review type:
+
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Select review type:",
+    header: "Review Type",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: [
+      { label: "Quality (Recommended)", description: "Code quality, best practices, maintainability" },
+      { label: "Security", description: "Security vulnerabilities, data handling, access control" },
+      { label: "Architecture", description: "Architectural patterns, technical debt, design decisions" },
+      { label: "Action Items", description: "Requirements met, acceptance criteria verified" }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+**Auto Mode** (`--yes`): Skip selection, default to `quality`.
+
+### Step 6.2: Validation
+
+```bash
+# Verify completed implementation exists
+sessionPath=".workflow/active/${sessionId}"
+
+if [ ! -d "${sessionPath}/.summaries" ] || [ -z "$(find ${sessionPath}/.summaries/ -name "IMPL-*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
+    echo "No completed implementation found. Complete implementation first."
+    exit 1
+fi
+```
+
+### Step 6.3: Context Loading
+
+```bash
+# Load implementation summaries
+for summary in ${sessionPath}/.summaries/*.md; do
+  cat "$summary"
+done
+
+# Load test results (if available)
+for test_summary in ${sessionPath}/.summaries/TEST-FIX-*.md 2>/dev/null; do
+  cat "$test_summary"
+done
+
+# Get changed files
+git log --since="$(cat ${sessionPath}/workflow-session.json | jq -r .created_at)" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u
+```
+
+### Step 6.4: Specialized Review Analysis
+
+Based on `review_type`, execute the corresponding analysis:
+
+**Security Review** (`security`):
+```bash
+# Pattern scan
+rg "password|token|secret|auth" -g "*.{ts,js,py}"
+rg "eval|exec|innerHTML|dangerouslySetInnerHTML" -g "*.{ts,js,tsx}"
+
+# Gemini security analysis
+ccw spec load --category review
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Security audit of completed implementation
+TASK: Review code for security vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, auth/authz issues
+CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..
+EXPECTED: Security findings report with severity levels
+RULES: Focus on OWASP Top 10, authentication, authorization, data validation, injection risks
+" --tool gemini --mode write --cd ${sessionPath}
+```
+
+**Architecture Review** (`architecture`):
+```bash
+ccw spec load --category review
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Architecture compliance review
+TASK: Evaluate adherence to architectural patterns, identify technical debt, review design decisions
+CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..
+EXPECTED: Architecture assessment with recommendations
+RULES: Check for patterns, separation of concerns, modularity, scalability
+" --tool qwen --mode write --cd ${sessionPath}
+```
+
+**Quality Review** (`quality`):
+```bash
+ccw spec load --category review
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Code quality and best practices review
+TASK: Assess code readability, maintainability, adherence to best practices
+CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..
+EXPECTED: Quality assessment with improvement suggestions
+RULES: Check for code smells, duplication, complexity, naming conventions
+" --tool gemini --mode write --cd ${sessionPath}
+```
+
+**Action Items Review** (`action-items`):
+```bash
+# Load task requirements and acceptance criteria
+for task_file in ${sessionPath}/.task/*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '
+    "Task: " + .id + "\n" +
+    "Requirements: " + .description + "\n" +
+    "Acceptance: " + (.convergence.criteria | join(", "))
+  '
+done
+
+# Cross-check implementation against requirements
+ccw spec load --category review
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Verify all requirements and acceptance criteria are met
+TASK: Cross-check implementation summaries against original requirements
+CONTEXT: @.task/IMPL-*.json,.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..
+EXPECTED:
+- Requirements coverage matrix
+- Acceptance criteria verification
+- Missing/incomplete action items
+- Pre-deployment readiness assessment
+RULES:
+- Check each requirement has corresponding implementation
+- Verify all acceptance criteria are met
+- Flag any incomplete or missing action items
+- Assess deployment readiness
+" --tool gemini --mode write --cd ${sessionPath}
+```
+
+### Step 6.5: Generate Review Report
+
+Write structured report to session directory:
+
+```markdown
+# Review Report: ${review_type}
+
+**Session**: ${sessionId}
+**Date**: $(date)
+**Type**: ${review_type}
+
+## Summary
+- Tasks Reviewed: [count IMPL tasks]
+- Files Changed: [count files]
+- Severity: [High/Medium/Low]
+
+## Findings
+
+### Critical Issues
+- [Issue 1 with file:line reference]
+
+### Recommendations
+- [Recommendation 1]
+
+### Positive Observations
+- [Good pattern observed]
+
+## Action Items
+- [ ] [Action 1]
+- [ ] [Action 2]
+```
+
+**Output**: `${sessionPath}/REVIEW-${review_type}.md`
+
+### Step 6.6: Post-Review Prompt
+
+```
+Review complete. Would you like to:
+→ Run another review type
+→ Complete session: /workflow:session:complete
+```
+
+If architecture or quality issues found, suggest:
+```
+Consider updating project documentation:
+→ /update-memory-related
+```
+
+## Output
+
+- **File**: `${sessionPath}/REVIEW-${review_type}.md`
+- **TodoWrite**: Mark Phase 6 completed
+
+## Next Phase
+
+Return to orchestrator for session completion or additional review cycles.