claude-code-workflow 7.2.28 → 7.2.30

package/.claude/skills/workflow-tdd-plan/phases/02-context-gathering.md

@@ -1,407 +1,407 @@
-# Phase 2: Context Gathering
-
-Gather project context and analyze codebase via context-search-agent with parallel exploration for TDD planning.
-
-## Objective
-
-- Gather project context using context-search-agent
-- Identify critical files, architecture patterns, and constraints
-- Detect conflict risk level for Phase 4 decision
-- Update planning-notes.md with findings
-
-## Core Philosophy
-
-- **Agent Delegation**: Delegate all discovery to `context-search-agent` for autonomous execution
-- **Detection-First**: Check for existing context-package before executing
-- **Plan Mode**: Full comprehensive analysis (vs lightweight brainstorm mode)
-- **Standardized Output**: Generate `.workflow/active/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
-
-## Execution
-
-### Step 2.1: Context-Package Detection
-
-**Execute First** - Check if valid package already exists:
-
-```javascript
-const contextPackagePath = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.process/context-package.json`;
-
-if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
-  const existing = Read(contextPackagePath);
-
-  // Validate package belongs to current session
-  if (existing?.metadata?.session_id === sessionId) {
-    console.log("Valid context-package found for session:", sessionId);
-    console.log("Stats:", existing.statistics);
-    console.log("Conflict Risk:", existing.conflict_detection.risk_level);
-    // Skip execution, store variables and proceed to Step 2.5
-    contextPath = contextPackagePath;
-    conflictRisk = existing.conflict_detection.risk_level;
-    return; // Early exit - skip Steps 2.2-2.4
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Step 2.2: Complexity Assessment & Parallel Explore
-
-**Only execute if Step 2.1 finds no valid package**
-
-```javascript
-// 2.2.1 Complexity Assessment
-function analyzeTaskComplexity(taskDescription) {
-  const text = taskDescription.toLowerCase();
-  if (/architect|refactor|restructure|modular|cross-module/.test(text)) return 'High';
-  if (/multiple|several|integrate|migrate|extend/.test(text)) return 'Medium';
-  return 'Low';
-}
-
-const ANGLE_PRESETS = {
-  architecture: ['architecture', 'dependencies', 'modularity', 'integration-points'],
-  security: ['security', 'auth-patterns', 'dataflow', 'validation'],
-  performance: ['performance', 'bottlenecks', 'caching', 'data-access'],
-  bugfix: ['error-handling', 'dataflow', 'state-management', 'edge-cases'],
-  feature: ['patterns', 'integration-points', 'testing', 'dependencies'],
-  refactor: ['architecture', 'patterns', 'dependencies', 'testing']
-};
-
-function selectAngles(taskDescription, complexity) {
-  const text = taskDescription.toLowerCase();
-  let preset = 'feature';
-  if (/refactor|architect|restructure/.test(text)) preset = 'architecture';
-  else if (/security|auth|permission/.test(text)) preset = 'security';
-  else if (/performance|slow|optimi/.test(text)) preset = 'performance';
-  else if (/fix|bug|error|issue/.test(text)) preset = 'bugfix';
-
-  const count = complexity === 'High' ? 4 : (complexity === 'Medium' ? 3 : 1);
-  return ANGLE_PRESETS[preset].slice(0, count);
-}
-
-const complexity = analyzeTaskComplexity(task_description);
-const selectedAngles = selectAngles(task_description, complexity);
-const sessionFolder = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.process`;
-
-// 2.2.2 Launch Parallel Explore Agents
-const explorationTasks = selectedAngles.map((angle, index) =>
-  Task(
-    subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
-    run_in_background=false,
-    description=`Explore: ${angle}`,
-    prompt=`
-## Task Objective
-Execute **${angle}** exploration for TDD task planning context. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover relevant structure, patterns, and constraints.
-
-## Assigned Context
-- **Exploration Angle**: ${angle}
-- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
-- **Session ID**: ${sessionId}
-- **Exploration Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length}
-- **Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
-
-## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
-1. Run: ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' (project structure)
-2. Run: rg -l "{keyword_from_task}" --type ts (locate relevant files)
-3. Execute: ccw tool exec json_builder '{"cmd":"init","schema":"explore","output":"${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json"}' (init output + get schema info)
-
-## Exploration Strategy (${angle} focus)
-
-**Step 1: Structural Scan** (Bash)
-- get_modules_by_depth.sh -> identify modules related to ${angle}
-- find/rg -> locate files relevant to ${angle} aspect
-- Analyze imports/dependencies from ${angle} perspective
-
-**Step 2: Semantic Analysis** (Gemini CLI)
-- How does existing code handle ${angle} concerns?
-- What patterns are used for ${angle}?
-- Where would new code integrate from ${angle} viewpoint?
-
-**Step 3: Write Output**
-- Consolidate ${angle} findings into JSON
-- Identify ${angle}-specific clarification needs
-
-## Expected Output
-
-**File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
-
-**Schema Reference**: Skeleton initialized via json_builder in step 3. Use `set` to populate fields, `validate` before returning.
-
-**Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused):
-- project_structure: Modules/architecture relevant to ${angle}
-- relevant_files: Files affected from ${angle} perspective
-  **MANDATORY**: Every file MUST use structured object format with ALL required fields:
-  [{path: "src/file.ts", relevance: 0.85, rationale: "Contains AuthService.login()", role: "modify_target", discovery_source: "bash-scan", key_symbols: ["AuthService", "login"]}]
-  - **rationale** (required): Specific selection basis tied to ${angle} topic (>10 chars, not generic)
-  - **role** (required): modify_target|dependency|pattern_reference|test_target|type_definition|integration_point|config|context_only
-  - **discovery_source** (recommended): bash-scan|cli-analysis|ace-search|dependency-trace|manual
-  - **key_symbols** (recommended): Key functions/classes/types in the file relevant to the task
-  - Scores: 0.7+ high priority, 0.5-0.7 medium, <0.5 low
-- patterns: ${angle}-related patterns to follow
-- dependencies: Dependencies relevant to ${angle}
-- integration_points: Where to integrate from ${angle} viewpoint (include file:line locations)
-- constraints: ${angle}-specific limitations/conventions
-- clarification_needs: ${angle}-related ambiguities (options array + recommended index)
-- _metadata.exploration_angle: "${angle}"
-
-## Success Criteria
-- [ ] Schema initialized via json_builder init
-- [ ] get_modules_by_depth.sh executed
-- [ ] At least 3 relevant files identified with ${angle} rationale
-- [ ] Patterns are actionable (code examples, not generic advice)
-- [ ] Integration points include file:line locations
-- [ ] Constraints are project-specific to ${angle}
-- [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
-- [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended
-
-## Output
-Write: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
-Return: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} findings
-`
-  )
-);
-
-// 2.2.3 Generate Manifest after all complete
-const explorationFiles = bash(`find ${sessionFolder} -name "exploration-*.json" -type f`).split('\n').filter(f => f.trim());
-const explorationManifest = {
-  session_id: sessionId,
-  task_description,
-  timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
-  complexity,
-  exploration_count: selectedAngles.length,
-  angles_explored: selectedAngles,
-  explorations: explorationFiles.map(file => {
-    const data = JSON.parse(Read(file));
-    return { angle: data._metadata.exploration_angle, file: file.split('/').pop(), path: file, index: data._metadata.exploration_index };
-  })
-};
-Write(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`, JSON.stringify(explorationManifest, null, 2));
-```
-
-### Step 2.3: Invoke Context-Search Agent
-
-**Only execute after Step 2.2 completes**
-
-```javascript
-// Load user intent from planning-notes.md (from Phase 1)
-const planningNotesPath = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/planning-notes.md`;
-let userIntent = { goal: task_description, key_constraints: "None specified" };
-
-if (file_exists(planningNotesPath)) {
-  const notesContent = Read(planningNotesPath);
-  const goalMatch = notesContent.match(/\*\*GOAL\*\*:\s*(.+)/);
-  const constraintsMatch = notesContent.match(/\*\*KEY_CONSTRAINTS\*\*:\s*(.+)/);
-  if (goalMatch) userIntent.goal = goalMatch[1].trim();
-  if (constraintsMatch) userIntent.key_constraints = constraintsMatch[1].trim();
-}
-
-Task(
-  subagent_type="context-search-agent",
-  run_in_background=false,
-  description="Gather comprehensive context for TDD plan",
-  prompt=`
-## Execution Mode
-**PLAN MODE** (Comprehensive) - Full Phase 1-3 execution with priority sorting
-
-## Session Information
-- **Session ID**: ${sessionId}
-- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
-- **Output Path**: .workflow/${sessionId}/.process/context-package.json
-
-## User Intent (from Phase 1 - Planning Notes)
-**GOAL**: ${userIntent.goal}
-**KEY_CONSTRAINTS**: ${userIntent.key_constraints}
-
-This is the PRIMARY context source - all subsequent analysis must align with user intent.
-
-## Exploration Input (from Step 2.2)
-- **Manifest**: ${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json
-- **Exploration Count**: ${explorationManifest.exploration_count}
-- **Angles**: ${explorationManifest.angles_explored.join(', ')}
-- **Complexity**: ${complexity}
-
-## Mission
-Execute complete context-search-agent workflow for TDD implementation planning:
-
-### Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
-1. **Project State Loading**:
-   - Run: \`ccw spec load --category execution\` to load project context, tech stack, and guidelines.
-   - Run: \`ccw spec load --category test\` to load test framework conventions, coverage targets, and fixtures.
-   - If files don't exist, proceed with fresh analysis.
-2. **Detection**: Check for existing context-package (early exit if valid)
-3. **Foundation**: Initialize CodexLens, get project structure, load docs
-4. **Analysis**: Extract keywords, determine scope, classify complexity
-
-### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
-Execute all discovery tracks (WITH USER INTENT INTEGRATION):
-- **Track -1**: User Intent & Priority Foundation (EXECUTE FIRST)
-  - Load user intent (GOAL, KEY_CONSTRAINTS) from session input
-  - Map user requirements to codebase entities (files, modules, patterns)
-  - Establish baseline priority scores based on user goal alignment
-  - Output: user_intent_mapping.json with preliminary priority scores
-
-- **Track 0**: Exploration Synthesis (load explorations-manifest.json, prioritize critical_files, deduplicate patterns/integration_points)
-- **Track 1**: Historical archive analysis (query manifest.json for lessons learned)
-- **Track 2**: Reference documentation (CLAUDE.md, architecture docs)
-- **Track 3**: Web examples (use Exa MCP for unfamiliar tech/APIs)
-- **Track 4**: Codebase analysis (5-layer discovery: files, content, patterns, deps, config/tests)
-
-### Phase 3: Synthesis, Assessment & Packaging
-1. Apply relevance scoring and build dependency graph
-2. **Synthesize 5-source data**: Merge findings from all sources
-   - Priority order: User Intent > Archive > Docs > Exploration > Code > Web
-   - **Prioritize the context from project-tech.json** for architecture and tech stack
-3. **Context Priority Sorting**:
-   a. Combine scores from Track -1 (user intent alignment) + relevance scores + exploration critical_files
-   b. Classify files into priority tiers:
-      - **Critical** (score >= 0.85): Directly mentioned in user goal OR exploration critical_files
-      - **High** (0.70-0.84): Key dependencies, patterns required for goal
-      - **Medium** (0.50-0.69): Supporting files, indirect dependencies
-      - **Low** (< 0.50): Contextual awareness only
-   c. Generate dependency_order: Based on dependency graph + user goal sequence
-   d. Document sorting_rationale: Explain prioritization logic
-4. **Populate project_context**: Directly use the overview from project-tech.json
-5. **Populate project_guidelines**: Load from specs/*.md
-6. Integrate brainstorm artifacts (if .brainstorming/ exists, read content)
-7. Perform conflict detection with risk assessment
-8. **Inject historical conflicts** from archive analysis into conflict_detection
-9. **Generate prioritized_context section**:
-   {
-     "prioritized_context": {
-       "user_intent": { "goal": "...", "scope": "...", "key_constraints": ["..."] },
-       "priority_tiers": {
-         "critical": [{ "path": "...", "relevance": 0.95, "rationale": "..." }],
-         "high": [...], "medium": [...], "low": [...]
-       },
-       "dependency_order": ["module1", "module2", "module3"],
-       "sorting_rationale": "Based on user goal alignment, exploration critical files, and dependency graph"
-     }
-   }
-10. Generate and validate context-package.json with prioritized_context field
-
-## Output Requirements
-Complete context-package.json with:
-- **metadata**: task_description, keywords, complexity, tech_stack, session_id
-- **project_context**: description, technology_stack, architecture, key_components (from project-tech.json)
-- **project_guidelines**: {conventions, constraints, quality_rules, learnings} (from specs/*.md)
-- **assets**: {documentation[], source_code[], config[], tests[]} with relevance scores
-- **dependencies**: {internal[], external[]} with dependency graph
-- **brainstorm_artifacts**: {guidance_specification, role_analyses[], synthesis_output} with content
-- **conflict_detection**: {risk_level, risk_factors, affected_modules[], mitigation_strategy, historical_conflicts[]}
-- **exploration_results**: {manifest_path, exploration_count, angles, explorations[], aggregated_insights}
-- **prioritized_context**: {user_intent, priority_tiers{critical, high, medium, low}, dependency_order[], sorting_rationale}
-
-## Quality Validation
-Before completion verify:
-- [ ] Valid JSON format with all required fields
-- [ ] File relevance accuracy >80%
-- [ ] Dependency graph complete (max 2 transitive levels)
-- [ ] Conflict risk level calculated correctly
-- [ ] No sensitive data exposed
-- [ ] Total files <= 50 (prioritize high-relevance)
-
-## Planning Notes Record (REQUIRED)
-After completing context-package.json, append to planning-notes.md:
-
-**File**: .workflow/active/${sessionId}/planning-notes.md
-**Location**: Under "## Context Findings (Phase 2)" section
-**Format**:
-### [Context-Search Agent] YYYY-MM-DD
-- **Note**: [Brief summary of key findings]
-
-Execute autonomously following agent documentation.
-Report completion with statistics.
-`
-)
-```
-
-### Step 2.4: Output Verification
-
-After agent completes, verify output:
-
-```javascript
-// Verify file was created
-const outputPath = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.process/context-package.json`;
-if (!file_exists(outputPath)) {
-  throw new Error("Agent failed to generate context-package.json");
-}
-
-// Store variables for subsequent phases
-contextPath = outputPath;
-
-// Verify exploration_results included
-const pkg = JSON.parse(Read(outputPath));
-if (pkg.exploration_results?.exploration_count > 0) {
-  console.log(`Exploration results aggregated: ${pkg.exploration_results.exploration_count} angles`);
-}
-
-conflictRisk = pkg.conflict_detection?.risk_level || 'low';
-```
-
-### TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 in progress - tasks attached)
-
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "  -> Analyze codebase structure", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing codebase structure"},
-  {"content": "  -> Identify integration points", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying integration points"},
-  {"content": "  -> Generate context package", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating context package"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
-  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
-  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
-]
-```
-
-### TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)
-
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
-  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
-  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
-]
-```
-
-### Step 2.5: Update Planning Notes
-
-After context gathering completes, update planning-notes.md with findings:
-
-```javascript
-// Read context-package to extract key findings
-const contextPackage = JSON.parse(Read(contextPath))
-const conflictRisk = contextPackage.conflict_detection?.risk_level || 'low'
-const criticalFiles = (contextPackage.exploration_results?.aggregated_insights?.critical_files || [])
-  .slice(0, 5).map(f => f.path)
-const archPatterns = contextPackage.project_context?.architecture_patterns || []
-const constraints = contextPackage.exploration_results?.aggregated_insights?.constraints || []
-
-// Append Phase 2 findings to planning-notes.md
-Edit(planningNotesPath, {
-  old: '## Context Findings (Phase 2)\n(To be filled by context-gather)',
-  new: `## Context Findings (Phase 2)
-
-- **CRITICAL_FILES**: ${criticalFiles.join(', ') || 'None identified'}
-- **ARCHITECTURE**: ${archPatterns.join(', ') || 'Not detected'}
-- **CONFLICT_RISK**: ${conflictRisk}
-- **CONSTRAINTS**: ${constraints.length > 0 ? constraints.join('; ') : 'None'}`
-})
-
-// Append Phase 2 constraints to consolidated list
-Edit(planningNotesPath, {
-  old: '## Consolidated Constraints (Phase 4 Input)',
-  new: `## Consolidated Constraints (Phase 4 Input)
-${constraints.map((c, i) => `${i + 2}. [Context] ${c}`).join('\n')}`
-})
-```
-
-**Auto-Continue**: Return to user showing Phase 2 results, then auto-continue to Phase 3.
-
-## Output
-
-- **Variable**: `contextPath` (path to context-package.json)
-- **Variable**: `conflictRisk` (none/low/medium/high)
-- **File**: `context-package.json`
-- **TodoWrite**: Mark Phase 2 completed, determine Phase 3 or Phase 4
-
-## Next Phase
-
-Return to orchestrator. Orchestrator continues to [Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis](03-test-coverage-analysis.md).
+# Phase 2: Context Gathering
+
+Gather project context and analyze codebase via context-search-agent with parallel exploration for TDD planning.
+
+## Objective
+
+- Gather project context using context-search-agent
+- Identify critical files, architecture patterns, and constraints
+- Detect conflict risk level for Phase 4 decision
+- Update planning-notes.md with findings
+
+## Core Philosophy
+
+- **Agent Delegation**: Delegate all discovery to `context-search-agent` for autonomous execution
+- **Detection-First**: Check for existing context-package before executing
+- **Plan Mode**: Full comprehensive analysis (vs lightweight brainstorm mode)
+- **Standardized Output**: Generate `.workflow/active/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
+
+## Execution
+
+### Step 2.1: Context-Package Detection
+
+**Execute First** - Check if valid package already exists:
+
+```javascript
+const contextPackagePath = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.process/context-package.json`;
+
+if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
+  const existing = Read(contextPackagePath);
+
+  // Validate package belongs to current session
+  if (existing?.metadata?.session_id === sessionId) {
+    console.log("Valid context-package found for session:", sessionId);
+    console.log("Stats:", existing.statistics);
+    console.log("Conflict Risk:", existing.conflict_detection.risk_level);
+    // Skip execution, store variables and proceed to Step 2.5
+    contextPath = contextPackagePath;
+    conflictRisk = existing.conflict_detection.risk_level;
+    return; // Early exit - skip Steps 2.2-2.4
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Step 2.2: Complexity Assessment & Parallel Explore
+
+**Only execute if Step 2.1 finds no valid package**
+
+```javascript
+// 2.2.1 Complexity Assessment
+function analyzeTaskComplexity(taskDescription) {
+  const text = taskDescription.toLowerCase();
+  if (/architect|refactor|restructure|modular|cross-module/.test(text)) return 'High';
+  if (/multiple|several|integrate|migrate|extend/.test(text)) return 'Medium';
+  return 'Low';
+}
+
+const ANGLE_PRESETS = {
+  architecture: ['architecture', 'dependencies', 'modularity', 'integration-points'],
+  security: ['security', 'auth-patterns', 'dataflow', 'validation'],
+  performance: ['performance', 'bottlenecks', 'caching', 'data-access'],
+  bugfix: ['error-handling', 'dataflow', 'state-management', 'edge-cases'],
+  feature: ['patterns', 'integration-points', 'testing', 'dependencies'],
+  refactor: ['architecture', 'patterns', 'dependencies', 'testing']
+};
+
+function selectAngles(taskDescription, complexity) {
+  const text = taskDescription.toLowerCase();
+  let preset = 'feature';
+  if (/refactor|architect|restructure/.test(text)) preset = 'architecture';
+  else if (/security|auth|permission/.test(text)) preset = 'security';
+  else if (/performance|slow|optimi/.test(text)) preset = 'performance';
+  else if (/fix|bug|error|issue/.test(text)) preset = 'bugfix';
+
+  const count = complexity === 'High' ? 4 : (complexity === 'Medium' ? 3 : 1);
+  return ANGLE_PRESETS[preset].slice(0, count);
+}
+
+const complexity = analyzeTaskComplexity(task_description);
+const selectedAngles = selectAngles(task_description, complexity);
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.process`;
+
+// 2.2.2 Launch Parallel Explore Agents
+const explorationTasks = selectedAngles.map((angle, index) =>
+  Task(
+    subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+    run_in_background=false,
+    description=`Explore: ${angle}`,
+    prompt=`
+## Task Objective
+Execute **${angle}** exploration for TDD task planning context. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover relevant structure, patterns, and constraints.
+
+## Assigned Context
+- **Exploration Angle**: ${angle}
+- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
+- **Session ID**: ${sessionId}
+- **Exploration Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length}
+- **Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
+
+## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+1. Run: ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' (project structure)
+2. Run: rg -l "{keyword_from_task}" --type ts (locate relevant files)
+3. Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/explore-json-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+
+## Exploration Strategy (${angle} focus)
+
+**Step 1: Structural Scan** (Bash)
+- get_modules_by_depth.sh -> identify modules related to ${angle}
+- find/rg -> locate files relevant to ${angle} aspect
+- Analyze imports/dependencies from ${angle} perspective
+
+**Step 2: Semantic Analysis** (Gemini CLI)
+- How does existing code handle ${angle} concerns?
+- What patterns are used for ${angle}?
+- Where would new code integrate from ${angle} viewpoint?
+
+**Step 3: Write Output**
+- Consolidate ${angle} findings into JSON
+- Identify ${angle}-specific clarification needs
+
+## Expected Output
+
+**File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
+
+**Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 3, follow schema exactly
+
+**Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused):
+- project_structure: Modules/architecture relevant to ${angle}
+- relevant_files: Files affected from ${angle} perspective
+  **MANDATORY**: Every file MUST use structured object format with ALL required fields:
+  [{path: "src/file.ts", relevance: 0.85, rationale: "Contains AuthService.login()", role: "modify_target", discovery_source: "bash-scan", key_symbols: ["AuthService", "login"]}]
+  - **rationale** (required): Specific selection basis tied to ${angle} topic (>10 chars, not generic)
+  - **role** (required): modify_target|dependency|pattern_reference|test_target|type_definition|integration_point|config|context_only
+  - **discovery_source** (recommended): bash-scan|cli-analysis|ace-search|dependency-trace|manual
+  - **key_symbols** (recommended): Key functions/classes/types in the file relevant to the task
+  - Scores: 0.7+ high priority, 0.5-0.7 medium, <0.5 low
+- patterns: ${angle}-related patterns to follow
+- dependencies: Dependencies relevant to ${angle}
+- integration_points: Where to integrate from ${angle} viewpoint (include file:line locations)
+- constraints: ${angle}-specific limitations/conventions
+- clarification_needs: ${angle}-related ambiguities (options array + recommended index)
+- _metadata.exploration_angle: "${angle}"
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] Schema obtained via cat explore-json-schema.json
+- [ ] get_modules_by_depth.sh executed
+- [ ] At least 3 relevant files identified with ${angle} rationale
+- [ ] Patterns are actionable (code examples, not generic advice)
+- [ ] Integration points include file:line locations
+- [ ] Constraints are project-specific to ${angle}
+- [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+- [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended
+
+## Output
+Write: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
+Return: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} findings
+`
+  )
+);
+
+// 2.2.3 Generate Manifest after all complete
+const explorationFiles = bash(`find ${sessionFolder} -name "exploration-*.json" -type f`).split('\n').filter(f => f.trim());
+const explorationManifest = {
+  session_id: sessionId,
+  task_description,
+  timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
+  complexity,
+  exploration_count: selectedAngles.length,
+  angles_explored: selectedAngles,
+  explorations: explorationFiles.map(file => {
+    const data = JSON.parse(Read(file));
+    return { angle: data._metadata.exploration_angle, file: file.split('/').pop(), path: file, index: data._metadata.exploration_index };
+  })
+};
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`, JSON.stringify(explorationManifest, null, 2));
+```
+
+### Step 2.3: Invoke Context-Search Agent
+
+**Only execute after Step 2.2 completes**
+
+```javascript
+// Load user intent from planning-notes.md (from Phase 1)
+const planningNotesPath = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/planning-notes.md`;
+let userIntent = { goal: task_description, key_constraints: "None specified" };
+
+if (file_exists(planningNotesPath)) {
+  const notesContent = Read(planningNotesPath);
+  const goalMatch = notesContent.match(/\*\*GOAL\*\*:\s*(.+)/);
+  const constraintsMatch = notesContent.match(/\*\*KEY_CONSTRAINTS\*\*:\s*(.+)/);
+  if (goalMatch) userIntent.goal = goalMatch[1].trim();
+  if (constraintsMatch) userIntent.key_constraints = constraintsMatch[1].trim();
+}
+
+Task(
+  subagent_type="context-search-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Gather comprehensive context for TDD plan",
+  prompt=`
+## Execution Mode
+**PLAN MODE** (Comprehensive) - Full Phase 1-3 execution with priority sorting
+
+## Session Information
+- **Session ID**: ${sessionId}
+- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
+- **Output Path**: .workflow/${sessionId}/.process/context-package.json
+
+## User Intent (from Phase 1 - Planning Notes)
+**GOAL**: ${userIntent.goal}
+**KEY_CONSTRAINTS**: ${userIntent.key_constraints}
+
+This is the PRIMARY context source - all subsequent analysis must align with user intent.
+
+## Exploration Input (from Step 2.2)
+- **Manifest**: ${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json
+- **Exploration Count**: ${explorationManifest.exploration_count}
+- **Angles**: ${explorationManifest.angles_explored.join(', ')}
+- **Complexity**: ${complexity}
+
+## Mission
+Execute complete context-search-agent workflow for TDD implementation planning:
+
+### Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
+1. **Project State Loading**:
+   - Run: \`ccw spec load --category execution\` to load project context, tech stack, and guidelines.
+   - Run: \`ccw spec load --category test\` to load test framework conventions, coverage targets, and fixtures.
+   - If files don't exist, proceed with fresh analysis.
+2. **Detection**: Check for existing context-package (early exit if valid)
+3. **Foundation**: Initialize CodexLens, get project structure, load docs
+4. **Analysis**: Extract keywords, determine scope, classify complexity
+
+### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
+Execute all discovery tracks (WITH USER INTENT INTEGRATION):
+- **Track -1**: User Intent & Priority Foundation (EXECUTE FIRST)
+  - Load user intent (GOAL, KEY_CONSTRAINTS) from session input
+  - Map user requirements to codebase entities (files, modules, patterns)
+  - Establish baseline priority scores based on user goal alignment
+  - Output: user_intent_mapping.json with preliminary priority scores
+
+- **Track 0**: Exploration Synthesis (load explorations-manifest.json, prioritize critical_files, deduplicate patterns/integration_points)
+- **Track 1**: Historical archive analysis (query manifest.json for lessons learned)
+- **Track 2**: Reference documentation (CLAUDE.md, architecture docs)
+- **Track 3**: Web examples (use Exa MCP for unfamiliar tech/APIs)
+- **Track 4**: Codebase analysis (5-layer discovery: files, content, patterns, deps, config/tests)
+
+### Phase 3: Synthesis, Assessment & Packaging
+1. Apply relevance scoring and build dependency graph
+2. **Synthesize 5-source data**: Merge findings from all sources
+   - Priority order: User Intent > Archive > Docs > Exploration > Code > Web
+   - **Prioritize the context from project-tech.json** for architecture and tech stack
+3. **Context Priority Sorting**:
+   a. Combine scores from Track -1 (user intent alignment) + relevance scores + exploration critical_files
+   b. Classify files into priority tiers:
+      - **Critical** (score >= 0.85): Directly mentioned in user goal OR exploration critical_files
+      - **High** (0.70-0.84): Key dependencies, patterns required for goal
+      - **Medium** (0.50-0.69): Supporting files, indirect dependencies
+      - **Low** (< 0.50): Contextual awareness only
+   c. Generate dependency_order: Based on dependency graph + user goal sequence
+   d. Document sorting_rationale: Explain prioritization logic
+4. **Populate project_context**: Directly use the overview from project-tech.json
+5. **Populate project_guidelines**: Load from specs/*.md
+6. Integrate brainstorm artifacts (if .brainstorming/ exists, read content)
+7. Perform conflict detection with risk assessment
+8. **Inject historical conflicts** from archive analysis into conflict_detection
+9. **Generate prioritized_context section**:
+   {
+     "prioritized_context": {
+       "user_intent": { "goal": "...", "scope": "...", "key_constraints": ["..."] },
+       "priority_tiers": {
+         "critical": [{ "path": "...", "relevance": 0.95, "rationale": "..." }],
+         "high": [...], "medium": [...], "low": [...]
+       },
+       "dependency_order": ["module1", "module2", "module3"],
+       "sorting_rationale": "Based on user goal alignment, exploration critical files, and dependency graph"
+     }
+   }
+10. Generate and validate context-package.json with prioritized_context field
+
+## Output Requirements
+Complete context-package.json with:
+- **metadata**: task_description, keywords, complexity, tech_stack, session_id
+- **project_context**: description, technology_stack, architecture, key_components (from project-tech.json)
+- **project_guidelines**: {conventions, constraints, quality_rules, learnings} (from specs/*.md)
+- **assets**: {documentation[], source_code[], config[], tests[]} with relevance scores
+- **dependencies**: {internal[], external[]} with dependency graph
+- **brainstorm_artifacts**: {guidance_specification, role_analyses[], synthesis_output} with content
+- **conflict_detection**: {risk_level, risk_factors, affected_modules[], mitigation_strategy, historical_conflicts[]}
+- **exploration_results**: {manifest_path, exploration_count, angles, explorations[], aggregated_insights}
+- **prioritized_context**: {user_intent, priority_tiers{critical, high, medium, low}, dependency_order[], sorting_rationale}
+
+## Quality Validation
+Before completion verify:
+- [ ] Valid JSON format with all required fields
+- [ ] File relevance accuracy >80%
+- [ ] Dependency graph complete (max 2 transitive levels)
+- [ ] Conflict risk level calculated correctly
+- [ ] No sensitive data exposed
+- [ ] Total files <= 50 (prioritize high-relevance)
+
+## Planning Notes Record (REQUIRED)
+After completing context-package.json, append to planning-notes.md:
+
+**File**: .workflow/active/${sessionId}/planning-notes.md
+**Location**: Under "## Context Findings (Phase 2)" section
+**Format**:
+### [Context-Search Agent] YYYY-MM-DD
+- **Note**: [Brief summary of key findings]
+
+Execute autonomously following agent documentation.
+Report completion with statistics.
+`
+)
+```
+
+### Step 2.4: Output Verification
+
+After agent completes, verify output:
+
+```javascript
+// Verify file was created
+const outputPath = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.process/context-package.json`;
+if (!file_exists(outputPath)) {
+  throw new Error("Agent failed to generate context-package.json");
+}
+
+// Store variables for subsequent phases
+contextPath = outputPath;
+
+// Verify exploration_results included
+const pkg = JSON.parse(Read(outputPath));
+if (pkg.exploration_results?.exploration_count > 0) {
+  console.log(`Exploration results aggregated: ${pkg.exploration_results.exploration_count} angles`);
+}
+
+conflictRisk = pkg.conflict_detection?.risk_level || 'low';
+```
+
+### TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 in progress - tasks attached)
+
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "  -> Analyze codebase structure", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing codebase structure"},
+  {"content": "  -> Identify integration points", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying integration points"},
+  {"content": "  -> Generate context package", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating context package"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
+
+### TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)
+
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
+
+### Step 2.5: Update Planning Notes
+
+After context gathering completes, update planning-notes.md with findings:
+
+```javascript
+// Read context-package to extract key findings
+const contextPackage = JSON.parse(Read(contextPath))
+const conflictRisk = contextPackage.conflict_detection?.risk_level || 'low'
+const criticalFiles = (contextPackage.exploration_results?.aggregated_insights?.critical_files || [])
+  .slice(0, 5).map(f => f.path)
+const archPatterns = contextPackage.project_context?.architecture_patterns || []
+const constraints = contextPackage.exploration_results?.aggregated_insights?.constraints || []
+
+// Append Phase 2 findings to planning-notes.md
+Edit(planningNotesPath, {
+  old: '## Context Findings (Phase 2)\n(To be filled by context-gather)',
+  new: `## Context Findings (Phase 2)
+
+- **CRITICAL_FILES**: ${criticalFiles.join(', ') || 'None identified'}
+- **ARCHITECTURE**: ${archPatterns.join(', ') || 'Not detected'}
+- **CONFLICT_RISK**: ${conflictRisk}
+- **CONSTRAINTS**: ${constraints.length > 0 ? constraints.join('; ') : 'None'}`
+})
+
+// Append Phase 2 constraints to consolidated list
+Edit(planningNotesPath, {
+  old: '## Consolidated Constraints (Phase 4 Input)',
+  new: `## Consolidated Constraints (Phase 4 Input)
+${constraints.map((c, i) => `${i + 2}. [Context] ${c}`).join('\n')}`
+})
+```
+
+**Auto-Continue**: Return to user showing Phase 2 results, then auto-continue to Phase 3.
+
+## Output
+
+- **Variable**: `contextPath` (path to context-package.json)
+- **Variable**: `conflictRisk` (none/low/medium/high)
+- **File**: `context-package.json`
+- **TodoWrite**: Mark Phase 2 completed, determine Phase 3 or Phase 4
+
+## Next Phase
+
+Return to orchestrator. Orchestrator continues to [Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis](03-test-coverage-analysis.md).