claude-code-workflow 7.2.24 → 7.2.26
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.ccw/workflows/cli-tools-usage.md +123 -521
- package/.claude/CLAUDE.md +20 -0
- package/.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md +6 -0
- package/.claude/agents/cli-explore-agent.md +63 -77
- package/.claude/agents/cli-lite-planning-agent.md +10 -11
- package/.claude/agents/issue-plan-agent.md +7 -2
- package/.claude/commands/workflow/spec/setup.md +1 -1
- package/.claude/skills/brainstorm/SKILL.md +408 -408
- package/.claude/skills/review-cycle/SKILL.md +132 -132
- package/.claude/skills/review-cycle/phases/review-module.md +4 -4
- package/.claude/skills/review-cycle/phases/review-session.md +4 -4
- package/.claude/skills/spec-generator/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/.claude/skills/team-designer/phases/02-scaffold-generation.md +1 -1
- package/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/.claude/skills/team-review/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/SKILL.md +3 -3
- package/.claude/skills/workflow-plan/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/.claude/skills/workflow-plan/phases/03-conflict-resolution.md +2 -2
- package/.claude/skills/workflow-plan/phases/05-plan-verify.md +2 -2
- package/.claude/skills/workflow-tdd-plan/phases/02-context-gathering.md +3 -3
- package/.claude/skills/workflow-tdd-plan/phases/04-conflict-resolution.md +2 -2
- package/.claude/skills/workflow-test-fix/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/.claude/skills/workflow-test-fix/phases/02-test-context-gather.md +2 -2
- package/.codex/AGENTS.md +16 -0
- package/.codex/skills/analyze-with-file/SKILL.md +966 -966
- package/.codex/skills/issue-discover/SKILL.md +361 -361
- package/.codex/skills/review-cycle/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/.codex/skills/roadmap-with-file/SKILL.md +901 -901
- package/.codex/skills/spec-generator/SKILL.md +425 -425
- package/.codex/skills/spec-setup/SKILL.md +669 -669
- package/.codex/skills/team-designer/phases/02-scaffold-generation.md +1 -1
- package/.codex/skills/workflow-test-fix-cycle/SKILL.md +402 -402
- package/ccw/dist/tools/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/ccw/dist/tools/index.js +2 -0
- package/ccw/dist/tools/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/ccw/dist/tools/json-builder.d.ts +17 -0
- package/ccw/dist/tools/json-builder.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/ccw/dist/tools/json-builder.js +746 -0
- package/ccw/dist/tools/json-builder.js.map +1 -0
- package/ccw/dist/tools/schema-registry.d.ts +71 -0
- package/ccw/dist/tools/schema-registry.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/ccw/dist/tools/schema-registry.js +136 -0
- package/ccw/dist/tools/schema-registry.js.map +1 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/SKILL.md +0 -127
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/architect/role.md +0 -65
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/coordinator/commands/analyze.md +0 -62
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/coordinator/commands/dispatch.md +0 -234
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/coordinator/commands/monitor.md +0 -182
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/coordinator/role.md +0 -153
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/developer/role.md +0 -74
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/reviewer/role.md +0 -66
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/tester/role.md +0 -88
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/specs/pipelines.md +0 -94
- package/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/specs/team-config.json +0 -172
- package/.codex/prompts/prep-cycle.md +0 -416
- package/.codex/prompts/prep-plan.md +0 -371
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/SKILL.md +0 -219
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/roles/architect/role.md +0 -65
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/roles/coordinator/commands/analyze.md +0 -62
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/roles/coordinator/commands/dispatch.md +0 -187
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/roles/coordinator/commands/monitor.md +0 -227
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/roles/coordinator/role.md +0 -193
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/roles/developer/role.md +0 -74
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/roles/reviewer/role.md +0 -66
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/roles/tester/role.md +0 -88
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/specs/pipelines.md +0 -94
- package/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/specs/team-config.json +0 -172
|
@@ -1,74 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
role: developer
|
|
3
|
-
prefix: DEV
|
|
4
|
-
inner_loop: true
|
|
5
|
-
message_types:
|
|
6
|
-
success: dev_complete
|
|
7
|
-
progress: dev_progress
|
|
8
|
-
error: error
|
|
9
|
-
---
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
# Developer
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
Code implementer. Implements code according to design, incremental delivery. Acts as Generator in Generator-Critic loop (paired with reviewer).
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## Phase 2: Context Loading
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
| Input | Source | Required |
|
|
18
|
-
|-------|--------|----------|
|
|
19
|
-
| Task description | From task subject/description | Yes |
|
|
20
|
-
| Session path | Extracted from task description | Yes |
|
|
21
|
-
| .msg/meta.json | <session>/.msg/meta.json | Yes |
|
|
22
|
-
| Design document | <session>/design/design-001.md | For non-fix tasks |
|
|
23
|
-
| Task breakdown | <session>/design/task-breakdown.json | For non-fix tasks |
|
|
24
|
-
| Review feedback | <session>/review/*.md | For fix tasks |
|
|
25
|
-
| Wisdom files | <session>/wisdom/ | No |
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
1. Extract session path from task description
|
|
28
|
-
2. Read .msg/meta.json for shared context
|
|
29
|
-
3. Detect task type:
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
| Task Type | Detection | Loading |
|
|
32
|
-
|-----------|-----------|---------|
|
|
33
|
-
| Fix task | Subject contains "fix" | Read latest review file for feedback |
|
|
34
|
-
| Normal task | No "fix" in subject | Read design document + task breakdown |
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
4. Load previous implementation_context from .msg/meta.json
|
|
37
|
-
5. Read wisdom files for conventions and known issues
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
## Phase 3: Code Implementation
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
**Implementation strategy selection**:
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
| Task Count | Complexity | Strategy |
|
|
44
|
-
|------------|------------|----------|
|
|
45
|
-
| <= 2 tasks | Low | Direct: inline Edit/Write |
|
|
46
|
-
| 3-5 tasks | Medium | Single agent: one code-developer for all |
|
|
47
|
-
| > 5 tasks | High | Batch agent: group by module, one agent per batch |
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
**Fix Task Mode** (GC Loop):
|
|
50
|
-
- Focus on review feedback items only
|
|
51
|
-
- Fix critical issues first, then high, then medium
|
|
52
|
-
- Do NOT change code that was not flagged
|
|
53
|
-
- Maintain existing code style and patterns
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
**Normal Task Mode**:
|
|
56
|
-
- Read target files, apply changes using Edit or Write
|
|
57
|
-
- Follow execution order from task breakdown
|
|
58
|
-
- Validate syntax after each major change
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
## Phase 4: Self-Validation
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
| Check | Method | Pass Criteria |
|
|
63
|
-
|-------|--------|---------------|
|
|
64
|
-
| Syntax | tsc --noEmit or equivalent | No errors |
|
|
65
|
-
| File existence | Verify all planned files exist | All files present |
|
|
66
|
-
| Import resolution | Check no broken imports | All imports resolve |
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
1. Run syntax check: `tsc --noEmit` / `python -m py_compile` / equivalent
|
|
69
|
-
2. Auto-fix if validation fails (max 2 attempts)
|
|
70
|
-
3. Write dev log to `<session>/code/dev-log.md`:
|
|
71
|
-
- Changed files count, syntax status, fix task flag, file list
|
|
72
|
-
4. Update implementation_context in .msg/meta.json:
|
|
73
|
-
- task, changed_files, is_fix, syntax_clean
|
|
74
|
-
5. Write discoveries to wisdom/learnings.md
|
|
@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
role: reviewer
|
|
3
|
-
prefix: REVIEW
|
|
4
|
-
inner_loop: false
|
|
5
|
-
message_types:
|
|
6
|
-
success: review_passed
|
|
7
|
-
revision: review_revision
|
|
8
|
-
critical: review_critical
|
|
9
|
-
error: error
|
|
10
|
-
---
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
# Reviewer
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
Code reviewer. Multi-dimensional review, quality scoring, improvement suggestions. Acts as Critic in Generator-Critic loop (paired with developer).
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
## Phase 2: Context Loading
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
| Input | Source | Required |
|
|
19
|
-
|-------|--------|----------|
|
|
20
|
-
| Task description | From task subject/description | Yes |
|
|
21
|
-
| Session path | Extracted from task description | Yes |
|
|
22
|
-
| .msg/meta.json | <session>/.msg/meta.json | Yes |
|
|
23
|
-
| Design document | <session>/design/design-001.md | For requirements alignment |
|
|
24
|
-
| Changed files | Git diff | Yes |
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
1. Extract session path from task description
|
|
27
|
-
2. Read .msg/meta.json for shared context and previous review_feedback_trends
|
|
28
|
-
3. Read design document for requirements alignment
|
|
29
|
-
4. Get changed files via git diff, read file contents (limit 20 files)
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
## Phase 3: Multi-Dimensional Review
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
**Review dimensions**:
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
| Dimension | Weight | Focus Areas |
|
|
36
|
-
|-----------|--------|-------------|
|
|
37
|
-
| Correctness | 30% | Logic correctness, boundary handling |
|
|
38
|
-
| Completeness | 25% | Coverage of design requirements |
|
|
39
|
-
| Maintainability | 25% | Readability, code style, DRY |
|
|
40
|
-
| Security | 20% | Vulnerabilities, input validation |
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
Per-dimension: scan modified files, record findings with severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), include file:line references and suggestions.
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
**Scoring**: Weighted average of dimension scores (1-10 each).
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
**Output review report** (`<session>/review/review-<num>.md`):
|
|
47
|
-
- Files reviewed count, quality score, issue counts by severity
|
|
48
|
-
- Per-finding: severity, file:line, dimension, description, suggestion
|
|
49
|
-
- Scoring breakdown by dimension
|
|
50
|
-
- Signal: CRITICAL / REVISION_NEEDED / APPROVED
|
|
51
|
-
- Design alignment notes
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
## Phase 4: Trend Analysis + Verdict
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
1. Compare with previous review_feedback_trends from .msg/meta.json
|
|
56
|
-
2. Identify recurring issues, improvement areas, new issues
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
| Verdict Condition | Message Type |
|
|
59
|
-
|-------------------|--------------|
|
|
60
|
-
| criticalCount > 0 | review_critical |
|
|
61
|
-
| score < 7 | review_revision |
|
|
62
|
-
| else | review_passed |
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
3. Update review_feedback_trends in .msg/meta.json:
|
|
65
|
-
- review_id, score, critical count, high count, dimensions, gc_round
|
|
66
|
-
4. Write discoveries to wisdom/learnings.md
|
|
@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
role: tester
|
|
3
|
-
prefix: VERIFY
|
|
4
|
-
inner_loop: false
|
|
5
|
-
message_types:
|
|
6
|
-
success: verify_passed
|
|
7
|
-
failure: verify_failed
|
|
8
|
-
fix: fix_required
|
|
9
|
-
error: error
|
|
10
|
-
---
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
# Tester
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
Test validator. Test execution, fix cycles, and regression detection.
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
## Phase 2: Environment Detection
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
| Input | Source | Required |
|
|
19
|
-
|-------|--------|----------|
|
|
20
|
-
| Task description | From task subject/description | Yes |
|
|
21
|
-
| Session path | Extracted from task description | Yes |
|
|
22
|
-
| .msg/meta.json | <session>/.msg/meta.json | Yes |
|
|
23
|
-
| Changed files | Git diff | Yes |
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
1. Extract session path from task description
|
|
26
|
-
2. Read .msg/meta.json for shared context
|
|
27
|
-
3. Get changed files via git diff
|
|
28
|
-
4. Detect test framework and command:
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
| Detection | Method |
|
|
31
|
-
|-----------|--------|
|
|
32
|
-
| Test command | Check package.json scripts, pytest.ini, Makefile |
|
|
33
|
-
| Coverage tool | Check for nyc, coverage.py, jest --coverage config |
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
Common commands: npm test, pytest, go test ./..., cargo test
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## Phase 3: Execution + Fix Cycle
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
**Iterative test-fix cycle** (max 5 iterations):
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
| Step | Action |
|
|
42
|
-
|------|--------|
|
|
43
|
-
| 1 | Run test command |
|
|
44
|
-
| 2 | Parse results, check pass rate |
|
|
45
|
-
| 3 | Pass rate >= 95% -> exit loop (success) |
|
|
46
|
-
| 4 | Extract failing test details |
|
|
47
|
-
| 5 | Apply fix using CLI tool |
|
|
48
|
-
| 6 | Increment iteration counter |
|
|
49
|
-
| 7 | iteration >= MAX (5) -> exit loop (report failures) |
|
|
50
|
-
| 8 | Go to Step 1 |
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
**Fix delegation**: Use CLI tool to fix failing tests:
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
```bash
|
|
55
|
-
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Fix failing tests; success = all listed tests pass
|
|
56
|
-
TASK: • Analyze test failure output • Identify root cause in changed files • Apply minimal fix
|
|
57
|
-
MODE: write
|
|
58
|
-
CONTEXT: @<changed-files> | Memory: Test output from current iteration
|
|
59
|
-
EXPECTED: Code fixes that make failing tests pass without breaking other tests
|
|
60
|
-
CONSTRAINTS: Only modify files in changed list | Minimal changes
|
|
61
|
-
Test output: <test-failure-details>
|
|
62
|
-
Changed files: <file-list>" --tool gemini --mode write --rule development-debug-runtime-issues
|
|
63
|
-
```
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
Wait for CLI completion before re-running tests.
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
## Phase 4: Regression Check + Report
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
1. Run full test suite for regression: `<test-command> --all`
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
| Check | Method | Pass Criteria |
|
|
72
|
-
|-------|--------|---------------|
|
|
73
|
-
| Regression | Run full test suite | No FAIL in output |
|
|
74
|
-
| Coverage | Run coverage tool | >= 80% (if configured) |
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
2. Write verification results to `<session>/verify/verify-<num>.json`:
|
|
77
|
-
- verify_id, pass_rate, iterations, passed, timestamp, regression_passed
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
3. Determine message type:
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
| Condition | Message Type |
|
|
82
|
-
|-----------|--------------|
|
|
83
|
-
| passRate >= 0.95 | verify_passed |
|
|
84
|
-
| passRate < 0.95 && iterations >= MAX | fix_required |
|
|
85
|
-
| passRate < 0.95 | verify_failed |
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
4. Update .msg/meta.json with test_patterns entry
|
|
88
|
-
5. Write discoveries to wisdom/issues.md
|
|
@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# IterDev Pipeline Definitions
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## Three-Pipeline Architecture
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
### Patch Pipeline (2 beats, serial)
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
```
|
|
8
|
-
DEV-001 -> VERIFY-001
|
|
9
|
-
[developer] [tester]
|
|
10
|
-
```
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
### Sprint Pipeline (4 beats, with parallel window)
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
```
|
|
15
|
-
DESIGN-001 -> DEV-001 -> [VERIFY-001 + REVIEW-001] (parallel)
|
|
16
|
-
[architect] [developer] [tester] [reviewer]
|
|
17
|
-
```
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
### Multi-Sprint Pipeline (N beats, iterative)
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
```
|
|
22
|
-
Sprint 1: DESIGN-001 -> DEV-001 -> DEV-002(incremental) -> VERIFY-001 -> DEV-fix -> REVIEW-001
|
|
23
|
-
Sprint 2: DESIGN-002(refined) -> DEV-003 -> VERIFY-002 -> REVIEW-002
|
|
24
|
-
...
|
|
25
|
-
```
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## Generator-Critic Loop (developer <-> reviewer)
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
```
|
|
30
|
-
DEV -> REVIEW -> (if review.critical_count > 0 || review.score < 7)
|
|
31
|
-
-> DEV-fix -> REVIEW-2 -> (if still issues) -> DEV-fix-2 -> REVIEW-3
|
|
32
|
-
-> (max 3 rounds, then accept with warning)
|
|
33
|
-
```
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
## Pipeline Selection Logic
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
| Signal | Score |
|
|
38
|
-
|--------|-------|
|
|
39
|
-
| Changed files > 10 | +3 |
|
|
40
|
-
| Changed files 3-10 | +2 |
|
|
41
|
-
| Structural change | +3 |
|
|
42
|
-
| Cross-cutting concern | +2 |
|
|
43
|
-
| Simple fix | -2 |
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
| Score | Pipeline |
|
|
46
|
-
|-------|----------|
|
|
47
|
-
| >= 5 | multi-sprint |
|
|
48
|
-
| 2-4 | sprint |
|
|
49
|
-
| 0-1 | patch |
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
## Task Metadata Registry
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
| Task ID | Role | Pipeline | Dependencies | Description |
|
|
54
|
-
|---------|------|----------|-------------|-------------|
|
|
55
|
-
| DESIGN-001 | architect | sprint/multi | (none) | Technical design and task breakdown |
|
|
56
|
-
| DEV-001 | developer | all | DESIGN-001 (sprint/multi) or (none for patch) | Code implementation |
|
|
57
|
-
| DEV-002 | developer | multi | DEV-001 | Incremental implementation |
|
|
58
|
-
| DEV-fix | developer | sprint/multi | REVIEW-* (GC loop trigger) | Fix issues from review |
|
|
59
|
-
| VERIFY-001 | tester | all | DEV-001 (or last DEV) | Test execution and fix cycles |
|
|
60
|
-
| REVIEW-001 | reviewer | sprint/multi | DEV-001 (or last DEV) | Code review and quality scoring |
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
## Checkpoints
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
| Trigger Condition | Location | Behavior |
|
|
65
|
-
|-------------------|----------|----------|
|
|
66
|
-
| GC loop exceeds max rounds | After REVIEW-3 | Stop iteration, accept with warning, record in wisdom |
|
|
67
|
-
| Sprint transition | End of Sprint N | Pause, retrospective, user confirms `resume` for Sprint N+1 |
|
|
68
|
-
| Pipeline stall | No ready + no running tasks | Check missing tasks, report blockedBy chain to user |
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
## Multi-Sprint Dynamic Downgrade
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
If Sprint N metrics are strong (velocity >= expected, review avg >= 8), coordinator may downgrade Sprint N+1 from multi-sprint to sprint pipeline for efficiency.
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
## Task Ledger Schema
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
| Field | Description |
|
|
77
|
-
|-------|-------------|
|
|
78
|
-
| `sprint_id` | Current sprint identifier |
|
|
79
|
-
| `sprint_goal` | Sprint objective |
|
|
80
|
-
| `tasks[]` | Array of task entries |
|
|
81
|
-
| `metrics` | Aggregated metrics: total, completed, in_progress, blocked, velocity |
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
**Task Entry Fields**:
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
| Field | Description |
|
|
86
|
-
|-------|-------------|
|
|
87
|
-
| `id` | Task identifier |
|
|
88
|
-
| `title` | Task title |
|
|
89
|
-
| `owner` | Assigned role |
|
|
90
|
-
| `status` | pending / in_progress / completed / blocked |
|
|
91
|
-
| `started_at` / `completed_at` | Timestamps |
|
|
92
|
-
| `gc_rounds` | Generator-Critic iteration count |
|
|
93
|
-
| `review_score` | Reviewer score (null until reviewed) |
|
|
94
|
-
| `test_pass_rate` | Tester pass rate (null until tested) |
|
|
@@ -1,172 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
{
|
|
2
|
-
"team_name": "team-iterdev",
|
|
3
|
-
"team_display_name": "Team IterDev",
|
|
4
|
-
"description": "Iterative development team with Generator-Critic loop, task ledger, sprint learning, dynamic pipeline, conflict handling, concurrency control, rollback strategy, user feedback loop, and tech debt tracking",
|
|
5
|
-
"version": "1.2.0",
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
"roles": {
|
|
8
|
-
"coordinator": {
|
|
9
|
-
"task_prefix": null,
|
|
10
|
-
"responsibility": "Sprint planning, backlog management, task ledger maintenance, GC loop control, Phase 1: conflict handling, concurrency control, rollback strategy, Phase 3: user feedback loop, tech debt tracking",
|
|
11
|
-
"message_types": [
|
|
12
|
-
"sprint_started", "gc_loop_trigger", "sprint_complete", "task_unblocked", "error", "shutdown",
|
|
13
|
-
"conflict_detected", "conflict_resolved", "resource_locked", "resource_unlocked", "resource_contention",
|
|
14
|
-
"rollback_initiated", "rollback_completed", "rollback_failed",
|
|
15
|
-
"user_feedback_received", "tech_debt_identified"
|
|
16
|
-
]
|
|
17
|
-
},
|
|
18
|
-
"architect": {
|
|
19
|
-
"task_prefix": "DESIGN",
|
|
20
|
-
"responsibility": "Technical design, task decomposition, architecture decisions",
|
|
21
|
-
"message_types": ["design_ready", "design_revision", "error"]
|
|
22
|
-
},
|
|
23
|
-
"developer": {
|
|
24
|
-
"task_prefix": "DEV",
|
|
25
|
-
"responsibility": "Code implementation, incremental delivery",
|
|
26
|
-
"message_types": ["dev_complete", "dev_progress", "error"]
|
|
27
|
-
},
|
|
28
|
-
"tester": {
|
|
29
|
-
"task_prefix": "VERIFY",
|
|
30
|
-
"responsibility": "Test execution, fix cycle, regression detection",
|
|
31
|
-
"message_types": ["verify_passed", "verify_failed", "fix_required", "error"]
|
|
32
|
-
},
|
|
33
|
-
"reviewer": {
|
|
34
|
-
"task_prefix": "REVIEW",
|
|
35
|
-
"responsibility": "Code review, quality scoring, improvement suggestions",
|
|
36
|
-
"message_types": ["review_passed", "review_revision", "review_critical", "error"]
|
|
37
|
-
}
|
|
38
|
-
},
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
"pipelines": {
|
|
41
|
-
"patch": {
|
|
42
|
-
"description": "Simple fix: implement → verify",
|
|
43
|
-
"task_chain": ["DEV-001", "VERIFY-001"],
|
|
44
|
-
"gc_loops": 0
|
|
45
|
-
},
|
|
46
|
-
"sprint": {
|
|
47
|
-
"description": "Standard feature: design → implement → verify + review (parallel)",
|
|
48
|
-
"task_chain": ["DESIGN-001", "DEV-001", "VERIFY-001", "REVIEW-001"],
|
|
49
|
-
"gc_loops": 3,
|
|
50
|
-
"parallel_groups": [["VERIFY-001", "REVIEW-001"]]
|
|
51
|
-
},
|
|
52
|
-
"multi-sprint": {
|
|
53
|
-
"description": "Large feature: multiple sprint cycles with incremental delivery",
|
|
54
|
-
"task_chain": "dynamic — coordinator creates per-sprint chains",
|
|
55
|
-
"gc_loops": 3,
|
|
56
|
-
"sprint_count": "dynamic"
|
|
57
|
-
}
|
|
58
|
-
},
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
"innovation_patterns": {
|
|
61
|
-
"generator_critic": {
|
|
62
|
-
"generator": "developer",
|
|
63
|
-
"critic": "reviewer",
|
|
64
|
-
"max_rounds": 3,
|
|
65
|
-
"convergence_trigger": "review.critical_count === 0 && review.score >= 7"
|
|
66
|
-
},
|
|
67
|
-
"task_ledger": {
|
|
68
|
-
"file": "task-ledger.json",
|
|
69
|
-
"updated_by": "coordinator",
|
|
70
|
-
"tracks": ["status", "gc_rounds", "review_score", "test_pass_rate", "velocity"],
|
|
71
|
-
"phase1_extensions": {
|
|
72
|
-
"conflict_info": {
|
|
73
|
-
"fields": ["status", "conflicting_files", "resolution_strategy", "resolved_by_task_id"],
|
|
74
|
-
"default": { "status": "none", "conflicting_files": [], "resolution_strategy": null, "resolved_by_task_id": null }
|
|
75
|
-
},
|
|
76
|
-
"rollback_info": {
|
|
77
|
-
"fields": ["snapshot_id", "rollback_procedure", "last_successful_state_id"],
|
|
78
|
-
"default": { "snapshot_id": null, "rollback_procedure": null, "last_successful_state_id": null }
|
|
79
|
-
}
|
|
80
|
-
}
|
|
81
|
-
},
|
|
82
|
-
"shared_memory": {
|
|
83
|
-
"file": "shared-memory.json",
|
|
84
|
-
"fields": {
|
|
85
|
-
"architect": "architecture_decisions",
|
|
86
|
-
"developer": "implementation_context",
|
|
87
|
-
"tester": "test_patterns",
|
|
88
|
-
"reviewer": "review_feedback_trends"
|
|
89
|
-
},
|
|
90
|
-
"persistent_fields": ["sprint_history", "what_worked", "what_failed", "patterns_learned"],
|
|
91
|
-
"phase1_extensions": {
|
|
92
|
-
"resource_locks": {
|
|
93
|
-
"description": "Concurrency control: resource locking state",
|
|
94
|
-
"lock_timeout_ms": 300000,
|
|
95
|
-
"deadlock_detection": true
|
|
96
|
-
}
|
|
97
|
-
}
|
|
98
|
-
},
|
|
99
|
-
"dynamic_pipeline": {
|
|
100
|
-
"selector": "coordinator",
|
|
101
|
-
"criteria": "file_count + module_count + complexity_assessment",
|
|
102
|
-
"downgrade_rule": "velocity >= expected && review_avg >= 8 → simplify next sprint"
|
|
103
|
-
}
|
|
104
|
-
},
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
"phase1_features": {
|
|
107
|
-
"conflict_handling": {
|
|
108
|
-
"enabled": true,
|
|
109
|
-
"detection_strategy": "file_overlap",
|
|
110
|
-
"resolution_strategies": ["manual", "auto_merge", "abort"]
|
|
111
|
-
},
|
|
112
|
-
"concurrency_control": {
|
|
113
|
-
"enabled": true,
|
|
114
|
-
"lock_timeout_minutes": 5,
|
|
115
|
-
"deadlock_detection": true,
|
|
116
|
-
"resources": ["task-ledger.json", "shared-memory.json"]
|
|
117
|
-
},
|
|
118
|
-
"rollback_strategy": {
|
|
119
|
-
"enabled": true,
|
|
120
|
-
"snapshot_trigger": "task_complete",
|
|
121
|
-
"default_procedure": "git revert HEAD"
|
|
122
|
-
}
|
|
123
|
-
},
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
"phase2_features": {
|
|
126
|
-
"external_dependency_management": {
|
|
127
|
-
"enabled": true,
|
|
128
|
-
"validation_trigger": "task_start",
|
|
129
|
-
"supported_sources": ["npm", "maven", "pip", "git"],
|
|
130
|
-
"version_check_command": {
|
|
131
|
-
"npm": "npm list {name}",
|
|
132
|
-
"pip": "pip show {name}",
|
|
133
|
-
"maven": "mvn dependency:tree"
|
|
134
|
-
}
|
|
135
|
-
},
|
|
136
|
-
"state_recovery": {
|
|
137
|
-
"enabled": true,
|
|
138
|
-
"checkpoint_trigger": "phase_complete",
|
|
139
|
-
"max_checkpoints_per_task": 5,
|
|
140
|
-
"checkpoint_dir": "checkpoints/"
|
|
141
|
-
}
|
|
142
|
-
},
|
|
143
|
-
|
|
144
|
-
"phase3_features": {
|
|
145
|
-
"user_feedback_loop": {
|
|
146
|
-
"enabled": true,
|
|
147
|
-
"collection_trigger": "sprint_complete",
|
|
148
|
-
"max_feedback_items": 50,
|
|
149
|
-
"severity_levels": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"],
|
|
150
|
-
"status_flow": ["new", "reviewed", "addressed", "closed"]
|
|
151
|
-
},
|
|
152
|
-
"tech_debt_tracking": {
|
|
153
|
-
"enabled": true,
|
|
154
|
-
"detection_sources": ["review", "test", "architect"],
|
|
155
|
-
"categories": ["code", "design", "test", "documentation"],
|
|
156
|
-
"severity_levels": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"],
|
|
157
|
-
"status_flow": ["open", "in_progress", "resolved", "deferred"],
|
|
158
|
-
"report_trigger": "sprint_retrospective"
|
|
159
|
-
}
|
|
160
|
-
},
|
|
161
|
-
|
|
162
|
-
"collaboration_patterns": ["CP-1", "CP-3", "CP-5", "CP-6"],
|
|
163
|
-
|
|
164
|
-
"session_dirs": {
|
|
165
|
-
"base": ".workflow/.team/IDS-{slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/",
|
|
166
|
-
"design": "design/",
|
|
167
|
-
"code": "code/",
|
|
168
|
-
"verify": "verify/",
|
|
169
|
-
"review": "review/",
|
|
170
|
-
"messages": ".workflow/.team-msg/{team-name}/"
|
|
171
|
-
}
|
|
172
|
-
}
|