claude-code-workflow 6.3.54 → 7.0.0

package/.claude/commands/workflow/review-cycle-fix.md

@@ -1,608 +0,0 @@
----
-name: review-cycle-fix
-description: Automated fixing of code review findings with AI-powered planning and coordinated execution. Uses intelligent grouping, multi-stage timeline coordination, and test-driven verification.
-argument-hint: "<export-file|review-dir> [--resume] [--max-iterations=N]"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*), Edit(*), Write(*)
----
-
-# Workflow Review-Cycle-Fix Command
-
-## Quick Start
-
-```bash
-# Fix from exported findings file (session-based path)
-/workflow:review-cycle-fix .workflow/active/WFS-123/.review/fix-export-1706184622000.json
-
-# Fix from review directory (auto-discovers latest export)
-/workflow:review-cycle-fix .workflow/active/WFS-123/.review/
-
-# Resume interrupted fix session
-/workflow:review-cycle-fix --resume
-
-# Custom max retry attempts per finding
-/workflow:review-cycle-fix .workflow/active/WFS-123/.review/ --max-iterations=5
-```
-
-**Fix Source**: Exported findings from review cycle dashboard
-**Output Directory**: `{review-dir}/fixes/{fix-session-id}/` (within session .review/)
-**Default Max Iterations**: 3 (per finding, adjustable)
-**CLI Tools**: @cli-planning-agent (planning), @cli-execute-agent (fixing)
-
-## What & Why
-
-### Core Concept
-Automated fix orchestrator with **two-phase architecture**: AI-powered planning followed by coordinated parallel/serial execution. Generates fix timeline with intelligent grouping and dependency analysis, then executes fixes with conservative test verification.
-
-**Fix Process**:
-- **Planning Phase**: AI analyzes findings, generates fix plan with grouping and execution strategy
-- **Execution Phase**: Main orchestrator coordinates agents per timeline stages
-- **No rigid structure**: Adapts to task requirements, not bound to fixed JSON format
-
-**vs Manual Fixing**:
-- **Manual**: Developer reviews findings one-by-one, fixes sequentially
-- **Automated**: AI groups related issues, executes in optimal parallel/serial order with automatic test verification
-
-### Value Proposition
-1. **Intelligent Planning**: AI-powered analysis identifies optimal grouping and execution strategy
-2. **Multi-stage Coordination**: Supports complex parallel + serial execution with dependency management
-3. **Conservative Safety**: Mandatory test verification with automatic rollback on failure
-4. **Resume Support**: Checkpoint-based recovery for interrupted sessions
-
-### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
-- **ONLY command** for automated review finding fixes
-- Manages: Planning phase coordination, stage-based execution, agent scheduling, progress tracking
-- Delegates: Fix planning to @cli-planning-agent, fix execution to @cli-execute-agent
-
-
-### Execution Flow
-
-```
-Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
-   └─ Validate export file, create fix session structure, initialize state files
-
-Phase 2: Planning Coordination (@cli-planning-agent)
-   ├─ Analyze findings for patterns and dependencies
-   ├─ Group by file + dimension + root cause similarity
-   ├─ Determine execution strategy (parallel/serial/hybrid)
-   ├─ Generate fix timeline with stages
-   └─ Output: fix-plan.json
-
-Phase 3: Execution Orchestration (Stage-based)
-   For each timeline stage:
-   ├─ Load groups for this stage
-   ├─ If parallel: Launch all group agents simultaneously
-   ├─ If serial: Execute groups sequentially
-   ├─ Each agent:
-   │  ├─ Analyze code context
-   │  ├─ Apply fix per strategy
-   │  ├─ Run affected tests
-   │  ├─ On test failure: Rollback, retry up to max_iterations
-   │  └─ On success: Commit, update fix-progress-{N}.json
-   └─ Advance to next stage
-
-Phase 4: Completion & Aggregation
-   └─ Aggregate results → Generate fix-summary.md → Update history → Output summary
-
-Phase 5: Session Completion (Optional)
-   └─ If all fixes successful → Prompt to complete workflow session
-```
-
-### Agent Roles
-
-| Agent | Responsibility |
-|-------|---------------|
-| **Orchestrator** | Input validation, session management, planning coordination, stage-based execution scheduling, progress tracking, aggregation |
-| **@cli-planning-agent** | Findings analysis, intelligent grouping (file+dimension+root cause), execution strategy determination (parallel/serial/hybrid), timeline generation with dependency mapping |
-| **@cli-execute-agent** | Fix execution per group, code context analysis, Edit tool operations, test verification, git rollback on failure, completion JSON generation |
-
-## Enhanced Features
-
-### 1. Two-Phase Architecture
-
-**Phase Separation**:
-
-| Phase | Agent | Output | Purpose |
-|-------|-------|--------|---------|
-| **Planning** | @cli-planning-agent | fix-plan.json | Analyze findings, group intelligently, determine optimal execution strategy |
-| **Execution** | @cli-execute-agent | completions/*.json | Execute fixes per plan with test verification and rollback |
-
-**Benefits**:
-- Clear separation of concerns (analysis vs execution)
-- Reusable plans (can re-execute without re-planning)
-- Better error isolation (planning failures vs execution failures)
-
-### 2. Intelligent Grouping Strategy
-
-**Three-Level Grouping**:
-
-```javascript
-// Level 1: Primary grouping by file + dimension
-{file: "auth.ts", dimension: "security"} → Group A
-{file: "auth.ts", dimension: "quality"} → Group B
-{file: "query-builder.ts", dimension: "security"} → Group C
-
-// Level 2: Secondary grouping by root cause similarity
-Group A findings → Semantic similarity analysis (threshold 0.7)
-  → Sub-group A1: "missing-input-validation" (findings 1, 2)
-  → Sub-group A2: "insecure-crypto" (finding 3)
-
-// Level 3: Dependency analysis
-Sub-group A1 creates validation utilities
-Sub-group C4 depends on those utilities
-→ A1 must execute before C4 (serial stage dependency)
-```
-
-**Similarity Computation**:
-- Combine: `description + recommendation + category`
-- Vectorize: TF-IDF or LLM embedding
-- Cluster: Greedy algorithm with cosine similarity > 0.7
-
-### 3. Execution Strategy Determination
-
-**Strategy Types**:
-
-| Strategy | When to Use | Stage Structure |
-|----------|-------------|-----------------|
-| **Parallel** | All groups independent, different files | Single stage, all groups in parallel |
-| **Serial** | Strong dependencies, shared resources | Multiple stages, one group per stage |
-| **Hybrid** | Mixed dependencies | Multiple stages, parallel within stages |
-
-**Dependency Detection**:
-- Shared file modifications
-- Utility creation + usage patterns
-- Test dependency chains
-- Risk level clustering (high-risk groups isolated)
-
-### 4. Conservative Test Verification
-
-**Test Strategy** (per fix):
-
-```javascript
-// 1. Identify affected tests
-const testPattern = identifyTestPattern(finding.file);
-// e.g., "tests/auth/**/*.test.*" for src/auth/service.ts
-
-// 2. Run tests
-const result = await runTests(testPattern);
-
-// 3. Evaluate
-if (result.passRate < 100%) {
-  // Rollback
-  await gitCheckout(finding.file);
-
-  // Retry with failure context
-  if (attempts < maxIterations) {
-    const fixContext = analyzeFailure(result.stderr);
-    regenerateFix(finding, fixContext);
-    retry();
-  } else {
-    markFailed(finding.id);
-  }
-} else {
-  // Commit
-  await gitCommit(`Fix: ${finding.title} [${finding.id}]`);
-  markFixed(finding.id);
-}
-```
-
-**Pass Criteria**: 100% test pass rate (no partial fixes)
-
-## Core Responsibilities
-
-### Orchestrator
-
-**Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization**
-- Input validation: Check export file exists and is valid JSON
-- Auto-discovery: If review-dir provided, find latest `*-fix-export.json`
-- Session creation: Generate fix-session-id (`fix-{timestamp}`)
-- Directory structure: Create `{review-dir}/fixes/{fix-session-id}/` with subdirectories
-- State files: Initialize active-fix-session.json (session marker)
-- TodoWrite initialization: Set up 4-phase tracking
-
-**Phase 2: Planning Coordination**
-- Launch @cli-planning-agent with findings data and project context
-- Validate fix-plan.json output (schema conformance, includes metadata with session status)
-- Load plan into memory for execution phase
-- TodoWrite update: Mark planning complete, start execution
-
-**Phase 3: Execution Orchestration**
-- Load fix-plan.json timeline stages
-- For each stage:
-  - If parallel mode: Launch all group agents via `Promise.all()`
-  - If serial mode: Execute groups sequentially with `await`
-  - Assign agent IDs (agents update their fix-progress-{N}.json)
-- Handle agent failures gracefully (mark group as failed, continue)
-- Advance to next stage only when current stage complete
-
-**Phase 4: Completion & Aggregation**
-- Collect final status from all fix-progress-{N}.json files
-- Generate fix-summary.md with timeline and results
-- Update fix-history.json with new session entry
-- Remove active-fix-session.json
-- TodoWrite completion: Mark all phases done
-- Output summary to user
-
-**Phase 5: Session Completion (Optional)**
-- If all findings fixed successfully (no failures):
-  - Prompt user: "All fixes complete. Complete workflow session? [Y/n]"
-  - If confirmed: Execute `/workflow:session:complete` to archive session with lessons learned
-- If partial success (some failures):
-  - Output: "Some findings failed. Review fix-summary.md before completing session."
-  - Do NOT auto-complete session
-
-### Output File Structure
-
-```
-.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
-├── fix-export-{timestamp}.json     # Exported findings (input)
-└── fixes/{fix-session-id}/
-    ├── fix-plan.json               # Planning agent output (execution plan with metadata)
-    ├── fix-progress-1.json         # Group 1 progress (planning agent init → agent updates)
-    ├── fix-progress-2.json         # Group 2 progress (planning agent init → agent updates)
-    ├── fix-progress-3.json         # Group 3 progress (planning agent init → agent updates)
-    ├── fix-summary.md              # Final report (orchestrator generates)
-    ├── active-fix-session.json     # Active session marker
-    └── fix-history.json            # All sessions history
-```
-
-**File Producers**:
-- **Planning Agent**: `fix-plan.json` (with metadata), all `fix-progress-*.json` (initial state)
-- **Execution Agents**: Update assigned `fix-progress-{N}.json` in real-time
-
-
-### Agent Invocation Template
-
-**Planning Agent**:
-```javascript
-Task({
-  subagent_type: "cli-planning-agent",
-  description: `Generate fix plan and initialize progress files for ${findings.length} findings`,
-  prompt: `
-## Task Objective
-Analyze ${findings.length} code review findings and generate execution plan with intelligent grouping and timeline coordination.
-
-## Input Data
-Review Session: ${reviewId}
-Fix Session ID: ${fixSessionId}
-Total Findings: ${findings.length}
-
-Findings:
-${JSON.stringify(findings, null, 2)}
-
-Project Context:
-- Structure: ${projectStructure}
-- Test Framework: ${testFramework}
-- Git Status: ${gitStatus}
-
-## Output Requirements
-
-### 1. fix-plan.json
-Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/fix-plan-template.json
-
-Generate execution plan following template structure:
-
-**Key Generation Rules**:
-- **Metadata**: Populate fix_session_id, review_session_id, status ("planning"), created_at, started_at timestamps
-- **Execution Strategy**: Choose approach (parallel/serial/hybrid) based on dependency analysis, set parallel_limit and stages count
-- **Groups**: Create groups (G1, G2, ...) with intelligent grouping (see Analysis Requirements below), assign progress files (fix-progress-1.json, ...), populate fix_strategy with approach/complexity/test_pattern, assess risks, identify dependencies
-- **Timeline**: Define stages respecting dependencies, set execution_mode per stage, map groups to stages, calculate critical path
-
-### 2. fix-progress-{N}.json (one per group)
-Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/fix-progress-template.json
-
-For each group (G1, G2, G3, ...), generate fix-progress-{N}.json following template structure:
-
-**Initial State Requirements**:
-- Status: "pending", phase: "waiting"
-- Timestamps: Set last_update to now, others null
-- Findings: Populate from review findings with status "pending", all operation fields null
-- Summary: Initialize all counters to zero
-- Flow control: Empty implementation_approach array
-- Errors: Empty array
-
-**CRITICAL**: Ensure complete template structure - all fields must be present.
-
-## Analysis Requirements
-
-### Intelligent Grouping Strategy
-Group findings using these criteria (in priority order):
-
-1. **File Proximity**: Findings in same file or related files
-2. **Dimension Affinity**: Same dimension (security, performance, etc.)
-3. **Root Cause Similarity**: Similar underlying issues
-4. **Fix Approach Commonality**: Can be fixed with similar approach
-
-**Grouping Guidelines**:
-- Optimal group size: 2-5 findings per group
-- Avoid cross-cutting concerns in same group
-- Consider test isolation (different test suites → different groups)
-- Balance workload across groups for parallel execution
-
-### Execution Strategy Determination
-
-**Parallel Mode**: Use when groups are independent, no shared files
-**Serial Mode**: Use when groups have dependencies or shared resources
-**Hybrid Mode**: Use for mixed dependency graphs (recommended for most cases)
-
-**Dependency Analysis**:
-- Identify shared files between groups
-- Detect test dependency chains
-- Evaluate risk of concurrent modifications
-
-### Risk Assessment
-
-For each group, evaluate:
-- **Complexity**: Based on code structure, file size, existing tests
-- **Impact Scope**: Number of files affected, API surface changes
-- **Rollback Feasibility**: Ease of reverting changes if tests fail
-
-### Test Strategy
-
-For each group, determine:
-- **Test Pattern**: Glob pattern matching affected tests
-- **Pass Criteria**: All tests must pass (100% pass rate)
-- **Test Command**: Infer from project (package.json, pytest.ini, etc.)
-
-## Output Files
-
-Write to ${sessionDir}:
-- ./fix-plan.json
-- ./fix-progress-1.json
-- ./fix-progress-2.json
-- ./fix-progress-{N}.json (as many as groups created)
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-Before finalizing outputs:
-- ✅ All findings assigned to exactly one group
-- ✅ Group dependencies correctly identified
-- ✅ Timeline stages respect dependencies
-- ✅ All progress files have complete initial structure
-- ✅ Test patterns are valid and specific
-- ✅ Risk assessments are realistic
-- ✅ Estimated times are reasonable
-  `
-})
-```
-
-**Execution Agent** (per group):
-```javascript
-Task({
-  subagent_type: "cli-execute-agent",
-  description: `Fix ${group.findings.length} issues: ${group.group_name}`,
-  prompt: `
-## Task Objective
-Execute fixes for code review findings in group ${group.group_id}. Update progress file in real-time with flow control tracking.
-
-## Assignment
-- Group ID: ${group.group_id}
-- Group Name: ${group.group_name}
-- Progress File: ${sessionDir}/${group.progress_file}
-- Findings Count: ${group.findings.length}
-- Max Iterations: ${maxIterations} (per finding)
-
-## Fix Strategy
-${JSON.stringify(group.fix_strategy, null, 2)}
-
-## Risk Assessment
-${JSON.stringify(group.risk_assessment, null, 2)}
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-### Initialization (Before Starting)
-
-1. Read ${group.progress_file} to load initial state
-2. Update progress file:
-   - assigned_agent: "${agentId}"
-   - status: "in-progress"
-   - started_at: Current ISO 8601 timestamp
-   - last_update: Current ISO 8601 timestamp
-3. Write updated state back to ${group.progress_file}
-
-### Main Execution Loop
-
-For EACH finding in ${group.progress_file}.findings:
-
-#### Step 1: Analyze Context
-
-**Before Step**:
-- Update finding: status→"in-progress", started_at→now()
-- Update current_finding: Populate with finding details, status→"analyzing", action→"Reading file and understanding code structure"
-- Update phase→"analyzing"
-- Update flow_control: Add "analyze_context" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"analyze_context"
-- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
-
-**Action**:
-- Read file: finding.file
-- Understand code structure around line: finding.line
-- Analyze surrounding context (imports, dependencies, related functions)
-- Review recommendations: finding.recommendations
-
-**After Step**:
-- Update flow_control: Mark "analyze_context" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
-- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
-
-#### Step 2: Apply Fix
-
-**Before Step**:
-- Update current_finding: status→"fixing", action→"Applying code changes per recommendations"
-- Update phase→"fixing"
-- Update flow_control: Add "apply_fix" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"apply_fix"
-- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
-
-**Action**:
-- Use Edit tool to implement code changes per finding.recommendations
-- Follow fix_strategy.approach
-- Maintain code style and existing patterns
-
-**After Step**:
-- Update flow_control: Mark "apply_fix" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
-- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
-
-#### Step 3: Test Verification
-
-**Before Step**:
-- Update current_finding: status→"testing", action→"Running test suite to verify fix"
-- Update phase→"testing"
-- Update flow_control: Add "run_tests" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"run_tests"
-- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
-
-**Action**:
-- Run tests using fix_strategy.test_pattern
-- Require 100% pass rate
-- Capture test output
-
-**On Test Failure**:
-- Git rollback: \`git checkout -- \${finding.file}\`
-- Increment finding.attempts
-- Update flow_control: Mark "run_tests" step as "failed" with completed_at→now()
-- Update errors: Add entry (finding_id, error_type→"test_failure", message, timestamp)
-- If finding.attempts < ${maxIterations}:
-  - Reset flow_control: implementation_approach→[], current_step→null
-  - Retry from Step 1
-- Else:
-  - Update finding: status→"completed", result→"failed", error_message→"Max iterations reached", completed_at→now()
-  - Update summary counts, move to next finding
-
-**On Test Success**:
-- Update flow_control: Mark "run_tests" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
-- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
-- Proceed to Step 4
-
-#### Step 4: Commit Changes
-
-**Before Step**:
-- Update current_finding: status→"committing", action→"Creating git commit for successful fix"
-- Update phase→"committing"
-- Update flow_control: Add "commit_changes" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"commit_changes"
-- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
-
-**Action**:
-- Git commit: \`git commit -m "fix(${finding.dimension}): ${finding.title} [${finding.id}]"\`
-- Capture commit hash
-
-**After Step**:
-- Update finding: status→"completed", result→"fixed", commit_hash→<captured>, test_passed→true, completed_at→now()
-- Update flow_control: Mark "commit_changes" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
-- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
-
-#### After Each Finding
-
-- Update summary: Recalculate counts (pending/in_progress/fixed/failed) and percent_complete
-- If all findings completed: Clear current_finding, reset flow_control
-- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
-
-### Final Completion
-
-When all findings processed:
-- Update status→"completed", phase→"done", summary.percent_complete→100.0
-- Update last_update→now(), write final state to ${group.progress_file}
-
-## Critical Requirements
-
-### Progress File Updates
-- **MUST update after every significant action** (before/after each step)
-- **Always maintain complete structure** - never write partial updates
-- **Use ISO 8601 timestamps** - e.g., "2025-01-25T14:36:00Z"
-
-### Flow Control Format
-Follow action-planning-agent flow_control.implementation_approach format:
-- step: Identifier (e.g., "analyze_context", "apply_fix")
-- action: Human-readable description
-- status: "pending" | "in-progress" | "completed" | "failed"
-- started_at: ISO 8601 timestamp or null
-- completed_at: ISO 8601 timestamp or null
-
-### Error Handling
-- Capture all errors in errors[] array
-- Never leave progress file in invalid state
-- Always write complete updates, never partial
-- On unrecoverable error: Mark group as failed, preserve state
-
-## Test Patterns
-Use fix_strategy.test_pattern to run affected tests:
-- Pattern: ${group.fix_strategy.test_pattern}
-- Command: Infer from project (npm test, pytest, etc.)
-- Pass Criteria: 100% pass rate required
-  `
-})
-```
-
-
-
-### Error Handling
-
-**Planning Failures**:
-- Invalid template → Abort with error message
-- Insufficient findings data → Request complete export
-- Planning timeout → Retry once, then fail gracefully
-
-**Execution Failures**:
-- Agent crash → Mark group as failed, continue with other groups
-- Test command not found → Skip test verification, warn user
-- Git operations fail → Abort with error, preserve state
-
-**Rollback Scenarios**:
-- Test failure after fix → Automatic `git checkout` rollback
-- Max iterations reached → Leave file unchanged, mark as failed
-- Unrecoverable error → Rollback entire group, save checkpoint
-
-### TodoWrite Structure
-
-**Initialization**:
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    {content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed"},
-    {content: "Phase 2: Planning", status: "in_progress"},
-    {content: "Phase 3: Execution", status: "pending"},
-    {content: "Phase 4: Completion", status: "pending"}
-  ]
-});
-```
-
-**During Execution**:
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    {content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed"},
-    {content: "Phase 2: Planning", status: "completed"},
-    {content: "Phase 3: Execution", status: "in_progress"},
-    {content: "  → Stage 1: Parallel execution (3 groups)", status: "completed"},
-    {content: "    • Group G1: Auth validation (2 findings)", status: "completed"},
-    {content: "    • Group G2: Query security (3 findings)", status: "completed"},
-    {content: "    • Group G3: Config quality (1 finding)", status: "completed"},
-    {content: "  → Stage 2: Serial execution (1 group)", status: "in_progress"},
-    {content: "    • Group G4: Dependent fixes (2 findings)", status: "in_progress"},
-    {content: "Phase 4: Completion", status: "pending"}
-  ]
-});
-```
-
-**Update Rules**:
-- Add stage items dynamically based on fix-plan.json timeline
-- Add group items per stage
-- Mark completed immediately after each group finishes
-- Update parent phase status when all child items complete
-
-## Post-Completion Expansion
-
-完成后询问用户是否扩展为issue(test/enhance/refactor/doc)，选中项调用 `/issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}"`
-
-## Best Practices
-
-1. **Trust AI Planning**: Planning agent's grouping and execution strategy are based on dependency analysis
-2. **Conservative Approach**: Test verification is mandatory - no fixes kept without passing tests
-3. **Parallel Efficiency**: Default 3 concurrent agents balances speed and resource usage
-4. **Resume Support**: Fix sessions can resume from checkpoints after interruption
-5. **Manual Review**: Always review failed fixes manually - may require architectural changes
-6. **Incremental Fixing**: Start with small batches (5-10 findings) before large-scale fixes
-
-## Related Commands
-
-### View Fix Progress
-Use `ccw view` to open the workflow dashboard in browser:
-
-```bash
-ccw view
-```