claude-code-workflow 6.3.53 → 7.0.0

package/.codex/skills/brainstorm-with-file/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,1033 @@
+---
+name: brainstorm-with-file
+description: Interactive brainstorming with parallel subagent collaboration, idea expansion, and documented thought evolution. Parallel multi-perspective analysis for Codex.
+argument-hint: "TOPIC=\"<idea or topic>\" [--perspectives=creative,pragmatic,systematic] [--max-ideas=<n>]"
+---
+
+# Codex Brainstorm-With-File Workflow
+
+## Quick Start
+
+Interactive brainstorming workflow with **documented thought evolution**. Expands initial ideas through questioning, **parallel subagent analysis**, and iterative refinement.
+
+**Core workflow**: Seed Idea → Expand → Parallel Subagent Explore → Synthesize → Refine → Crystallize
+
+**Key features**:
+- **brainstorm.md**: Complete thought evolution timeline
+- **Parallel multi-perspective**: Creative + Pragmatic + Systematic (concurrent subagents)
+- **Idea expansion**: Progressive questioning and exploration
+- **Diverge-Converge cycles**: Generate options then focus on best paths
+
+**Codex-Specific Features**:
+- Parallel subagent execution via `spawn_agent` + batch `wait({ ids: [...] })`
+- Role loading via path (agent reads `~/.codex/agents/*.md` itself)
+- Deep interaction with `send_input` for multi-round refinement within single agent
+- Explicit lifecycle management with `close_agent`
+
+## Overview
+
+This workflow enables iterative exploration and refinement of ideas through parallel-capable phases:
+
+1. **Seed Understanding** - Parse the initial idea and identify exploration vectors
+2. **Divergent Exploration** - Gather codebase context and execute parallel multi-perspective analysis
+3. **Interactive Refinement** - Multi-round idea selection, deep-dive, and refinement via send_input
+4. **Convergence & Crystallization** - Synthesize final ideas and generate recommendations
+
+The key innovation is **documented thought evolution** that captures how ideas develop, perspectives differ, and insights emerge across all phases.
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+{projectRoot}/.workflow/.brainstorm/BS-{slug}-{date}/
+├── brainstorm.md                  # ⭐ Complete thought evolution timeline
+├── exploration-codebase.json      # Phase 2: Codebase context
+├── perspectives/                  # Phase 2: Individual perspective outputs
+│   ├── creative.json
+│   ├── pragmatic.json
+│   └── systematic.json
+├── perspectives.json              # Phase 2: Aggregated parallel findings with synthesis
+├── synthesis.json                 # Phase 4: Final synthesis
+└── ideas/                         # Phase 3: Individual idea deep-dives
+    ├── idea-1.md
+    ├── idea-2.md
+    └── merged-idea-1.md
+```
+
+## Output Artifacts
+
+### Phase 1: Seed Understanding
+
+| Artifact | Purpose |
+|----------|---------|
+| `brainstorm.md` | Initialized with session metadata, seed expansion, and exploration vectors |
+| Session variables | Topic slug, brainstorm mode, dimensions, exploration vectors |
+
+### Phase 2: Divergent Exploration
+
+| Artifact | Purpose |
+|----------|---------|
+| `exploration-codebase.json` | Codebase context: relevant files, patterns, architecture constraints |
+| `perspectives/*.json` | Individual perspective outputs from parallel subagents |
+| `perspectives.json` | Aggregated parallel findings with synthesis (convergent/conflicting themes) |
+| Updated `brainstorm.md` | Round 2: Exploration results and multi-perspective analysis |
+
+### Phase 3: Interactive Refinement
+
+| Artifact | Purpose |
+|----------|---------|
+| `ideas/{idea-slug}.md` | Deep-dive analysis for selected ideas |
+| Updated `brainstorm.md` | Round 3-6: User feedback, idea selections, refinement cycles |
+
+### Phase 4: Convergence & Crystallization
+
+| Artifact | Purpose |
+|----------|---------|
+| `synthesis.json` | Final synthesis: top ideas, recommendations, insights |
+| Final `brainstorm.md` | Complete thought evolution with conclusions |
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### Session Initialization
+
+##### Step 0: Determine Project Root
+
+检测项目根目录，确保 `.workflow/` 产物位置正确：
+
+```bash
+PROJECT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
+```
+
+优先通过 git 获取仓库根目录；非 git 项目回退到 `pwd` 取当前绝对路径。
+存储为 `{projectRoot}`，后续所有 `.workflow/` 路径必须以此为前缀。
+
+The workflow automatically generates a unique session identifier and directory structure based on the topic and current date (UTC+8).
+
+**Session ID Format**: `BS-{slug}-{date}`
+- `slug`: Lowercase alphanumeric + Chinese characters, max 40 chars
+- `date`: YYYY-MM-DD format (UTC+8)
+
+**Session Directory**: `{projectRoot}/.workflow/.brainstorm/{sessionId}/`
+
+**Auto-Detection**: If session folder exists with brainstorm.md, automatically enters continue mode. Otherwise, creates new session.
+
+**Brainstorm Modes**:
+- `creative`: Emphasize novelty and innovation, relaxed constraints
+- `structured`: Balance creativity with feasibility, realistic scope
+- `balanced`: Default, moderate innovation with practical considerations
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1: Seed Understanding
+
+**Objective**: Parse the initial idea, identify exploration vectors, scope preferences, and initialize the brainstorm document.
+
+### Step 1.1: Parse Seed & Identify Dimensions
+
+The workflow analyzes the topic text against predefined brainstorm dimensions.
+
+**Brainstorm Dimensions**:
+
+| Dimension | Keywords |
+|-----------|----------|
+| technical | 技术, technical, implementation, code, 实现, architecture |
+| ux | 用户, user, experience, UX, UI, 体验, interaction |
+| business | 业务, business, value, ROI, 价值, market |
+| innovation | 创新, innovation, novel, creative, 新颖 |
+| feasibility | 可行, feasible, practical, realistic, 实际 |
+| scalability | 扩展, scale, growth, performance, 性能 |
+| security | 安全, security, risk, protection, 风险 |
+
+**Matching Logic**: Compare topic text against keyword lists to identify relevant dimensions.
+
+### Step 1.2: Role Selection
+
+Recommend roles based on topic keywords, then let user confirm or override.
+
+**Professional Roles** (recommended based on topic keywords):
+
+| Role | Perspective Agent Focus | Keywords |
+|------|------------------------|----------|
+| system-architect | Architecture, patterns | 架构, architecture, system, 系统, design pattern |
+| product-manager | Business value, roadmap | 产品, product, feature, 功能, roadmap |
+| ui-designer | Visual design, interaction | UI, 界面, interface, visual, 视觉 |
+| ux-expert | User research, usability | UX, 体验, experience, user, 用户 |
+| data-architect | Data modeling, storage | 数据, data, database, 存储, storage |
+| test-strategist | Quality, testing | 测试, test, quality, 质量, QA |
+| subject-matter-expert | Domain knowledge | 领域, domain, industry, 行业, expert |
+
+**Simple Perspectives** (fallback - always available):
+
+| Perspective | Focus | Best For |
+|-------------|-------|----------|
+| creative | Innovation, cross-domain | Generating novel ideas |
+| pragmatic | Implementation, feasibility | Reality-checking ideas |
+| systematic | Architecture, structure | Organizing solutions |
+
+**Selection Strategy**:
+1. **Auto mode**: Select top 3 recommended professional roles based on keyword matching
+2. **Manual mode**: Present recommended roles + "Use simple perspectives" option
+3. **Continue mode**: Use roles from previous session
+
+### Step 1.3: Initial Scoping (New Session Only)
+
+For new brainstorm sessions, gather user preferences before exploration.
+
+**Brainstorm Mode** (Single-select):
+- 创意模式 (Creative mode - 15-20 minutes, 1 subagent)
+- 平衡模式 (Balanced mode - 30-60 minutes, 3 parallel subagents)
+- 深度模式 (Deep mode - 1-2+ hours, 3 parallel subagents + deep refinement)
+
+**Focus Areas** (Multi-select):
+- 技术方案 (Technical solutions)
+- 用户体验 (User experience)
+- 创新突破 (Innovation breakthroughs)
+- 可行性评估 (Feasibility assessment)
+
+**Constraints** (Multi-select):
+- 现有架构 (Existing architecture constraints)
+- 时间限制 (Time constraints)
+- 资源限制 (Resource constraints)
+- 无约束 (No constraints)
+
+### Step 1.4: Expand Seed into Exploration Vectors
+
+Generate key questions that guide the brainstorming exploration. Use a subagent for vector generation.
+
+**Exploration Vectors**:
+1. **Core question**: What is the fundamental problem/opportunity?
+2. **User perspective**: Who benefits and how?
+3. **Technical angle**: What enables this technically?
+4. **Alternative approaches**: What other ways could this be solved?
+5. **Challenges**: What could go wrong or block success?
+6. **Innovation angle**: What would make this 10x better?
+7. **Integration**: How does this fit with existing systems/processes?
+
+**Subagent for Vector Generation**:
+
+```javascript
+const vectorAgent = spawn_agent({
+  message: `
+## TASK ASSIGNMENT
+
+### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
+1. **Read role definition**: ~/.codex/agents/cli-explore-agent.md (MUST read first)
+
+---
+
+## Context
+Topic: ${idea_or_topic}
+User focus areas: ${userFocusAreas.join(', ')}
+Constraints: ${constraints.join(', ')}
+
+## Task
+Generate 5-7 exploration vectors (questions/directions) to expand this idea:
+1. Core question: What is the fundamental problem/opportunity?
+2. User perspective: Who benefits and how?
+3. Technical angle: What enables this technically?
+4. Alternative approaches: What other ways could this be solved?
+5. Challenges: What could go wrong or block success?
+6. Innovation angle: What would make this 10x better?
+7. Integration: How does this fit with existing systems/processes?
+
+## Deliverables
+Return structured exploration vectors for multi-perspective analysis.
+`
+})
+
+const result = wait({ ids: [vectorAgent], timeout_ms: 120000 })
+close_agent({ id: vectorAgent })
+```
+
+**Purpose**: These vectors guide each perspective subagent's analysis and ensure comprehensive exploration.
+
+### Step 1.5: Initialize brainstorm.md
+
+Create the main brainstorm document with session metadata and expansion content.
+
+**brainstorm.md Structure**:
+- **Header**: Session ID, topic, start time, brainstorm mode, dimensions
+- **Initial Context**: Focus areas, depth level, constraints
+- **Roles**: Selected roles (professional or simple perspectives)
+- **Seed Expansion**: Original idea + exploration vectors
+- **Thought Evolution Timeline**: Round-by-round findings
+- **Current Ideas**: To be populated after exploration
+
+**Success Criteria**:
+- Session folder created successfully
+- brainstorm.md initialized with all metadata
+- 1-3 roles selected (professional or simple perspectives)
+- Brainstorm mode and dimensions identified
+- Exploration vectors generated
+- User preferences captured
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: Divergent Exploration
+
+**Objective**: Gather codebase context and execute parallel multi-perspective analysis via subagents to generate diverse viewpoints.
+
+**Execution Model**: Parallel subagent execution - spawn 3 perspective agents simultaneously, batch wait for all results, then aggregate.
+
+**Key API Pattern**:
+```
+spawn_agent × 3 → wait({ ids: [...] }) → aggregate → close_agent × 3
+```
+
+### Step 2.1: Codebase Context Gathering
+
+Use built-in tools to understand the codebase structure before spawning perspective agents.
+
+**Context Gathering Activities**:
+1. **Get project structure** - Execute `ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}'`
+2. **Search for related code** - Use Grep/Glob to find files matching topic keywords
+3. **Read project tech context** - Run `ccw spec load --category "exploration planning"` if spec system available
+4. **Analyze patterns** - Identify common code patterns and architecture decisions
+
+**exploration-codebase.json Structure**:
+- `relevant_files[]`: Files related to the topic with relevance indicators
+- `existing_patterns[]`: Common code patterns and architectural styles
+- `architecture_constraints[]`: Project-level constraints
+- `integration_points[]`: Key integration patterns between modules
+- `_metadata`: Timestamp and context information
+
+### Step 2.2: Parallel Multi-Perspective Analysis
+
+**⚠️ IMPORTANT**: Role files are NOT read by main process. Pass path in message, agent reads itself.
+
+Spawn 3 perspective agents in parallel: Creative + Pragmatic + Systematic.
+
+**Perspective Definitions**:
+
+| Perspective | Role File | Focus |
+|-------------|-----------|-------|
+| Creative | `~/.codex/agents/cli-explore-agent.md` | Innovation, cross-domain inspiration, challenging assumptions |
+| Pragmatic | `~/.codex/agents/cli-explore-agent.md` | Implementation feasibility, effort estimates, blockers |
+| Systematic | `~/.codex/agents/cli-explore-agent.md` | Problem decomposition, patterns, scalability |
+
+**Parallel Subagent Execution**:
+
+```javascript
+// Build shared context from codebase exploration
+const explorationContext = `
+CODEBASE CONTEXT:
+- Key files: ${explorationResults.relevant_files.slice(0,5).map(f => f.path).join(', ')}
+- Existing patterns: ${explorationResults.existing_patterns.slice(0,3).join(', ')}
+- Architecture constraints: ${explorationResults.architecture_constraints.slice(0,3).join(', ')}`
+
+// Define perspectives
+const perspectives = [
+  {
+    name: 'creative',
+    focus: 'Innovation and novelty',
+    tasks: [
+      'Think beyond obvious solutions - what would be surprising/delightful?',
+      'Explore cross-domain inspiration',
+      'Challenge assumptions - what if the opposite were true?',
+      'Generate moonshot ideas alongside practical ones'
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    name: 'pragmatic',
+    focus: 'Implementation reality',
+    tasks: [
+      'Evaluate technical feasibility of core concept',
+      'Identify existing patterns/libraries that could help',
+      'Estimate implementation complexity',
+      'Highlight potential technical blockers'
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    name: 'systematic',
+    focus: 'Architecture thinking',
+    tasks: [
+      'Decompose the problem into sub-problems',
+      'Identify architectural patterns that apply',
+      'Map dependencies and interactions',
+      'Consider scalability implications'
+    ]
+  }
+]
+
+// Parallel spawn - all agents start immediately
+const agentIds = perspectives.map(perspective => {
+  return spawn_agent({
+    message: `
+## TASK ASSIGNMENT
+
+### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
+1. **Read role definition**: ~/.codex/agents/cli-explore-agent.md (MUST read first)
+2. Run: `ccw spec load --category "exploration planning"`
+3. Read project tech context from loaded specs
+
+---
+
+## Brainstorm Context
+Topic: ${idea_or_topic}
+Perspective: ${perspective.name} - ${perspective.focus}
+Session: ${sessionFolder}
+
+${explorationContext}
+
+## ${perspective.name.toUpperCase()} Perspective Tasks
+${perspective.tasks.map(t => `• ${t}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Deliverables
+Write findings to: ${sessionFolder}/perspectives/${perspective.name}.json
+
+Schema: {
+  perspective: "${perspective.name}",
+  ideas: [{ title, description, novelty, feasibility, rationale }],
+  key_findings: [],
+  challenged_assumptions: [],
+  open_questions: [],
+  _metadata: { perspective, timestamp }
+}
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] Role definition read
+- [ ] 3-5 ideas generated with ratings
+- [ ] Key findings documented
+- [ ] JSON output follows schema
+`
+  })
+})
+
+// Batch wait - TRUE PARALLELISM (key Codex advantage)
+const results = wait({
+  ids: agentIds,
+  timeout_ms: 600000  // 10 minutes for all
+})
+
+// Handle timeout
+if (results.timed_out) {
+  // Some agents may still be running
+  // Option: continue waiting or use completed results
+}
+
+// Collect results from all perspectives
+const completedFindings = {}
+agentIds.forEach((agentId, index) => {
+  const perspective = perspectives[index]
+  if (results.status[agentId].completed) {
+    completedFindings[perspective.name] = results.status[agentId].completed
+  }
+})
+
+// Batch cleanup
+agentIds.forEach(id => close_agent({ id }))
+```
+
+### Step 2.3: Aggregate Multi-Perspective Findings
+
+Consolidate results from all three parallel perspective agents.
+
+**perspectives.json Structure**:
+- `session_id`: Reference to brainstorm session
+- `timestamp`: Completion time
+- `topic`: Original idea/topic
+- `creative`: Creative perspective findings (ideas with novelty ratings)
+- `pragmatic`: Pragmatic perspective findings (approaches with effort ratings)
+- `systematic`: Systematic perspective findings (architectural options)
+- `synthesis`: {convergent_themes, conflicting_views, unique_contributions}
+- `aggregated_ideas[]`: Merged ideas from all perspectives
+- `key_findings[]`: Main insights across all perspectives
+
+**Aggregation Activities**:
+1. Extract ideas and findings from each perspective's output
+2. Identify themes all perspectives agree on (convergent)
+3. Note conflicting views and tradeoffs
+4. Extract unique contributions from each perspective
+5. Merge and deduplicate similar ideas
+
+```javascript
+const synthesis = {
+  session_id: sessionId,
+  timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
+  topic: idea_or_topic,
+
+  // Individual perspective findings
+  creative: completedFindings.creative || {},
+  pragmatic: completedFindings.pragmatic || {},
+  systematic: completedFindings.systematic || {},
+
+  // Cross-perspective synthesis
+  synthesis: {
+    convergent_themes: extractConvergentThemes(completedFindings),
+    conflicting_views: extractConflicts(completedFindings),
+    unique_contributions: extractUniqueInsights(completedFindings)
+  },
+
+  // Aggregated for refinement
+  aggregated_ideas: mergeAllIdeas(completedFindings),
+  key_findings: mergeKeyFindings(completedFindings)
+}
+```
+
+### Step 2.4: Update brainstorm.md
+
+Append exploration results to the brainstorm timeline.
+
+**Round 2 Sections** (Multi-Perspective Exploration):
+- **Creative Perspective**: Novel ideas with novelty/impact ratings
+- **Pragmatic Perspective**: Practical approaches with effort/risk ratings
+- **Systematic Perspective**: Architectural options with tradeoff analysis
+- **Perspective Synthesis**: Convergent themes, conflicts, unique contributions
+
+**Documentation Standards**:
+- Include evidence from codebase exploration
+- Organize findings by perspective
+- Highlight areas of agreement and disagreement
+- Note key assumptions and reasoning
+
+**Success Criteria**:
+- All 3 subagents spawned and completed (or timeout handled)
+- `exploration-codebase.json` created with comprehensive context
+- `perspectives/*.json` created for each perspective
+- `perspectives.json` created with aggregated findings and synthesis
+- `brainstorm.md` updated with Round 2 results
+- All agents closed properly
+- Ready for interactive refinement phase
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3: Interactive Refinement
+
+**Objective**: Iteratively refine ideas through multi-round user-guided exploration cycles with deep dives, challenge testing, and idea merging.
+
+**Max Rounds**: 6 refinement rounds (can exit earlier if user indicates completion)
+
+**Execution Model**: Use `send_input` for deep interaction within same agent context, or spawn new agent for significantly different exploration angles.
+
+### Step 3.1: Present Findings & Gather User Direction
+
+Display current ideas and perspectives to the user.
+
+**Presentation Content**:
+- Top ideas from each perspective with ratings
+- Convergent themes and areas of agreement
+- Conflicting views and tradeoffs
+- Open questions for further exploration
+
+**User Feedback Options** (Single-select):
+
+| Option | Purpose | Next Action |
+|--------|---------|------------|
+| **深入探索** | Explore selected ideas in detail | `send_input` to active agent OR spawn deep-dive agent |
+| **继续发散** | Generate more ideas | Spawn new agent with different angles |
+| **挑战验证** | Test ideas critically | Spawn challenge agent (devil's advocate) |
+| **合并综合** | Combine multiple ideas | Spawn merge agent to synthesize |
+| **准备收敛** | Begin convergence | Exit refinement loop for synthesis |
+
+### Step 3.2: Deep Dive on Selected Ideas (via send_input or new agent)
+
+When user selects "deep dive", provide comprehensive analysis.
+
+**Option A: send_input to Existing Agent** (preferred if agent still active)
+
+```javascript
+// Continue with existing agent context
+send_input({
+  id: perspectiveAgent,  // Reuse agent from Phase 2 if not closed
+  message: `
+## CONTINUATION: Deep Dive Analysis
+
+Based on your initial exploration, the user wants deeper investigation on these ideas:
+${selectedIdeas.map((idea, i) => `${i+1}. ${idea.title}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Deep Dive Tasks
+• Elaborate each concept in detail
+• Identify implementation requirements and dependencies
+• Analyze potential challenges and propose mitigations
+• Suggest proof-of-concept approach
+• Define success metrics
+
+## Deliverables
+Write to: ${sessionFolder}/ideas/{idea-slug}.md for each selected idea
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] Each idea has detailed breakdown
+- [ ] Technical requirements documented
+- [ ] Risk analysis with mitigations
+`
+})
+
+const deepDiveResult = wait({ ids: [perspectiveAgent], timeout_ms: 600000 })
+```
+
+**Option B: Spawn New Deep-Dive Agent** (if prior agents closed)
+
+```javascript
+const deepDiveAgent = spawn_agent({
+  message: `
+## TASK ASSIGNMENT
+
+### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
+1. **Read role definition**: ~/.codex/agents/cli-explore-agent.md (MUST read first)
+2. Read: ${sessionFolder}/perspectives.json (prior findings)
+3. Run: `ccw spec load --category "exploration planning"`
+
+---
+
+## Deep Dive Context
+Topic: ${idea_or_topic}
+Selected Ideas: ${selectedIdeas.map(i => i.title).join(', ')}
+
+## Deep Dive Tasks
+${selectedIdeas.map(idea => `
+### ${idea.title}
+• Elaborate the core concept in detail
+• Identify implementation requirements
+• List potential challenges and mitigations
+• Suggest proof-of-concept approach
+• Define success metrics
+`).join('\n')}
+
+## Deliverables
+Write: ${sessionFolder}/ideas/{idea-slug}.md for each idea
+
+Include for each:
+- Detailed concept description
+- Technical requirements list
+- Risk/challenge matrix
+- MVP definition
+- Success criteria
+`
+})
+
+const result = wait({ ids: [deepDiveAgent], timeout_ms: 600000 })
+close_agent({ id: deepDiveAgent })
+```
+
+### Step 3.3: Devil's Advocate Challenge (spawn new agent)
+
+When user selects "challenge", spawn a dedicated challenge agent.
+
+```javascript
+const challengeAgent = spawn_agent({
+  message: `
+## TASK ASSIGNMENT
+
+### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
+1. **Read role definition**: ~/.codex/agents/cli-explore-agent.md (MUST read first)
+2. Read: ${sessionFolder}/perspectives.json (ideas to challenge)
+
+---
+
+## Challenge Context
+Topic: ${idea_or_topic}
+Ideas to Challenge:
+${selectedIdeas.map((idea, i) => `${i+1}. ${idea.title}: ${idea.description}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Devil's Advocate Tasks
+• For each idea, identify 3 strongest objections
+• Challenge core assumptions
+• Identify scenarios where this fails
+• Consider competitive/alternative solutions
+• Assess whether this solves the right problem
+• Rate survivability after challenge (1-5)
+
+## Deliverables
+Return structured challenge results:
+{
+  challenges: [{
+    idea: "...",
+    objections: [],
+    challenged_assumptions: [],
+    failure_scenarios: [],
+    alternatives: [],
+    survivability_rating: 1-5,
+    strengthened_version: "..."
+  }]
+}
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] 3+ objections per idea
+- [ ] Assumptions explicitly challenged
+- [ ] Survivability ratings assigned
+`
+})
+
+const result = wait({ ids: [challengeAgent], timeout_ms: 300000 })
+close_agent({ id: challengeAgent })
+```
+
+### Step 3.4: Merge Multiple Ideas (spawn merge agent)
+
+When user selects "merge", synthesize complementary ideas.
+
+```javascript
+const mergeAgent = spawn_agent({
+  message: `
+## TASK ASSIGNMENT
+
+### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
+1. **Read role definition**: ~/.codex/agents/cli-explore-agent.md (MUST read first)
+2. Read: ${sessionFolder}/perspectives.json (source ideas)
+
+---
+
+## Merge Context
+Topic: ${idea_or_topic}
+Ideas to Merge:
+${selectedIdeas.map((idea, i) => `
+${i+1}. ${idea.title} (${idea.source_perspective})
+   ${idea.description}
+   Strengths: ${idea.strengths?.join(', ') || 'N/A'}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+## Merge Tasks
+• Identify complementary elements
+• Resolve contradictions
+• Create unified concept
+• Preserve key strengths from each
+• Describe the merged solution
+• Assess viability of merged idea
+
+## Deliverables
+Write to: ${sessionFolder}/ideas/merged-idea-{n}.md
+
+Include:
+- Merged concept description
+- Elements taken from each source idea
+- Contradictions resolved (or noted as tradeoffs)
+- New combined strengths
+- Implementation considerations
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] Coherent merged concept
+- [ ] Source attributions clear
+- [ ] Contradictions addressed
+`
+})
+
+const result = wait({ ids: [mergeAgent], timeout_ms: 300000 })
+close_agent({ id: mergeAgent })
+```
+
+### Step 3.5: Document Each Round
+
+Update brainstorm.md with results from each refinement round.
+
+**Round N Sections** (Rounds 3-6):
+
+| Section | Content |
+|---------|---------|
+| User Direction | Action taken and ideas selected |
+| Findings | New findings and clarifications |
+| Idea Updates | Changes to idea scores and status |
+| Insights | Key learnings and realizations |
+| Next Directions | Suggested follow-up investigations |
+
+**Documentation Standards**:
+- Clear timestamps and action taken
+- Evidence-based findings with code references
+- Updated idea rankings and status changes
+- Explicit tracking of assumption changes
+- Organized by exploration vector
+
+**Success Criteria**:
+- User feedback processed for each round
+- `brainstorm.md` updated with all refinement rounds
+- Ideas in `ideas/` folder for selected deep-dives
+- All spawned agents closed properly
+- Exit condition reached (user selects converge or max rounds)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: Convergence & Crystallization
+
+**Objective**: Synthesize final ideas, generate conclusions and recommendations, and offer next steps.
+
+### Step 4.1: Consolidate Insights
+
+Extract and synthesize all findings from refinement rounds into final conclusions.
+
+**Consolidation Activities**:
+1. Review all refinement rounds and accumulated findings
+2. Rank ideas by score, feasibility, and impact
+3. Identify top 5 viable ideas
+4. Extract key learnings and insights
+5. Generate recommendations with rationale
+
+**synthesis.json Structure**:
+- `session_id`: Session identifier
+- `topic`: Original idea/topic
+- `completed`: Completion timestamp
+- `total_rounds`: Number of refinement rounds
+- `top_ideas[]`: Top 5 ranked ideas with scores and next steps
+- `parked_ideas[]`: Ideas parked for future consideration
+- `key_insights[]`: Key learnings from brainstorming process
+- `recommendations`: Primary recommendation and alternatives
+- `follow_up[]`: Suggested next steps (implementation, research, validation)
+
+**Idea Format**:
+- `title`: Clear, descriptive title
+- `description`: Complete concept description
+- `source_perspective`: Which perspective(s) contributed
+- `score`: Final viability score (1-10)
+- `novelty`: Novelty/innovation rating (1-5)
+- `feasibility`: Implementation feasibility (1-5)
+- `key_strengths`: Main advantages and benefits
+- `main_challenges`: Key challenges and limitations
+- `next_steps`: Recommended actions to pursue
+
+### Step 4.2: Final brainstorm.md Update
+
+Append conclusions section and finalize the thinking document.
+
+**Synthesis & Conclusions Section**:
+- **Executive Summary**: High-level overview of brainstorming results
+- **Top Ideas**: Ranked list with descriptions and strengths/challenges
+- **Primary Recommendation**: Best path forward with clear rationale
+- **Alternative Approaches**: Other viable options with tradeoff analysis
+- **Parked Ideas**: Future considerations with potential triggers
+- **Key Insights**: Important learnings from the process
+
+**Session Statistics**:
+- Total refinement rounds completed
+- Ideas generated and evaluated
+- Ideas survived challenges
+- Perspectives used (creative, pragmatic, systematic)
+- Artifacts generated
+
+### Step 4.3: Post-Completion Options
+
+Offer user follow-up actions based on brainstorming results.
+
+**Available Options**:
+
+| Option | Purpose | Action |
+|--------|---------|--------|
+| **创建实施计划** | Plan implementation of top idea | Launch `workflow:lite-plan` |
+| **创建Issue** | Track top ideas for later | Launch `issue:new` with ideas |
+| **深入分析** | Analyze top idea in detail | Launch `workflow:analyze-with-file` |
+| **导出分享** | Generate shareable report | Create formatted report document |
+| **完成** | No further action | End workflow |
+
+**Success Criteria**:
+- `synthesis.json` created with complete synthesis
+- `brainstorm.md` finalized with all conclusions
+- User offered meaningful next step options
+- Session complete and all artifacts available
+
+---
+
+## Configuration
+
+### Brainstorm Dimensions Reference
+
+Dimensions guide brainstorming scope and focus:
+
+| Dimension | Keywords | Best For |
+|-----------|----------|----------|
+| technical | 技术, technical, implementation, code | Implementation approaches |
+| ux | 用户, user, experience, UI | User-facing design ideas |
+| business | 业务, business, value | Business model innovations |
+| innovation | 创新, innovation, novel | Breakthrough ideas |
+| feasibility | 可行, feasible, practical | Realistic approaches |
+| scalability | 扩展, scale, growth | Large-scale solutions |
+| security | 安全, security, risk | Security considerations |
+
+### Brainstorm Modes
+
+| Mode | Duration | Intensity | Subagents |
+|------|----------|-----------|-----------|
+| Creative | 15-20 min | High novelty | 1 agent, short timeout |
+| Balanced | 30-60 min | Mixed | 3 parallel agents |
+| Deep | 1-2+ hours | Comprehensive | 3 parallel agents + deep refinement |
+
+### Collaboration Patterns
+
+| Pattern | Usage | Description |
+|---------|-------|-------------|
+| Parallel Divergence | New topic | All perspectives explore simultaneously via parallel subagents |
+| Sequential Deep-Dive | Promising idea | `send_input` to one agent for elaboration, others critique via new agents |
+| Debate Mode | Controversial approach | Spawn opposing agents to argue for/against |
+| Synthesis Mode | Ready to decide | Spawn synthesis agent combining insights from all perspectives |
+
+### Context Overflow Protection
+
+**Per-Agent Limits**:
+- Main analysis output: < 3000 words
+- Sub-document (if any): < 2000 words each
+- Maximum sub-documents: 5 per perspective
+
+**Synthesis Protection**:
+- If total analysis > 100KB, synthesis reads only main analysis files (not sub-documents)
+- Large ideas automatically split into separate idea documents in ideas/ folder
+
+**Recovery Steps**:
+1. Check agent outputs for truncation or overflow
+2. Reduce scope: fewer perspectives or simpler topic
+3. Use structured brainstorm mode for more focused output
+4. Split complex topics into multiple sessions
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling & Recovery
+
+| Situation | Action | Recovery |
+|-----------|--------|----------|
+| **Subagent timeout** | Check `results.timed_out`, continue `wait()` or use partial results | Reduce scope, use 2 perspectives instead of 3 |
+| **Agent closed prematurely** | Cannot recover closed agent | Spawn new agent with prior context from perspectives.json |
+| **Parallel agent partial failure** | Some perspectives complete, some fail | Use completed results, note gaps in synthesis |
+| **send_input to closed agent** | Error: agent not found | Spawn new agent with prior findings as context |
+| **No good ideas** | Reframe problem or adjust constraints | Try new exploration angles |
+| **User disengaged** | Summarize progress and offer break | Save state, keep agents alive for resume |
+| **Perspectives conflict** | Present as tradeoff options | Let user select preferred direction |
+| **Max rounds reached** | Force synthesis phase | Highlight unresolved questions |
+| **Session folder conflict** | Append timestamp suffix | Create unique folder |
+
+### Codex-Specific Error Patterns
+
+```javascript
+// Safe parallel execution with error handling
+try {
+  const agentIds = perspectives.map(p => spawn_agent({ message: buildPrompt(p) }))
+
+  const results = wait({ ids: agentIds, timeout_ms: 600000 })
+
+  if (results.timed_out) {
+    // Handle partial completion
+    const completed = agentIds.filter(id => results.status[id].completed)
+    const pending = agentIds.filter(id => !results.status[id].completed)
+
+    // Option 1: Continue waiting for pending
+    // const moreResults = wait({ ids: pending, timeout_ms: 300000 })
+
+    // Option 2: Use partial results
+    // processPartialResults(completed, results)
+  }
+
+  // Process all results
+  processResults(agentIds, results)
+
+} finally {
+  // ALWAYS cleanup, even on errors
+  agentIds.forEach(id => {
+    try { close_agent({ id }) } catch (e) { /* ignore */ }
+  })
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Iteration Patterns
+
+### First Brainstorm Session (Parallel Mode)
+
+```
+User initiates: TOPIC="idea or topic"
+   ├─ No session exists → New session mode
+   ├─ Parse topic and identify dimensions
+   ├─ Scope with user (focus, depth, mode)
+   ├─ Create brainstorm.md
+   ├─ Expand seed into vectors
+   ├─ Gather codebase context
+   │
+   ├─ Execute parallel perspective exploration:
+   │   ├─ spawn_agent × 3 (Creative + Pragmatic + Systematic)
+   │   ├─ wait({ ids: [...] })  ← TRUE PARALLELISM
+   │   └─ close_agent × 3
+   │
+   ├─ Aggregate findings with synthesis
+   └─ Enter multi-round refinement loop
+```
+
+### Continue Existing Session
+
+```
+User resumes: TOPIC="same topic"
+   ├─ Session exists → Continue mode
+   ├─ Load previous brainstorm.md
+   ├─ Load perspectives.json
+   └─ Resume from last refinement round
+```
+
+### Refinement Loop (Rounds 3-6)
+
+```
+Each round:
+   ├─ Present current findings and top ideas
+   ├─ Gather user feedback (deep dive/diverge/challenge/merge/converge)
+   ├─ Process response:
+   │   ├─ Deep Dive → send_input to active agent OR spawn deep-dive agent
+   │   ├─ Diverge → spawn new agent with different angles
+   │   ├─ Challenge → spawn challenge agent (devil's advocate)
+   │   ├─ Merge → spawn merge agent to synthesize
+   │   └─ Converge → Exit loop for synthesis
+   ├─ wait({ ids: [...] }) for result
+   ├─ Update brainstorm.md
+   └─ Repeat until user selects converge or max rounds reached
+```
+
+### Agent Lifecycle Management
+
+```
+Subagent lifecycle:
+   ├─ spawn_agent({ message }) → Create with role path + task
+   ├─ wait({ ids, timeout_ms }) → Get results (ONLY way to get output)
+   ├─ send_input({ id, message }) → Continue interaction (if not closed)
+   └─ close_agent({ id }) → Cleanup (MUST do, cannot recover)
+
+Key rules:
+   ├─ NEVER close before you're done with an agent
+   ├─ ALWAYS use wait() to get results, NOT close_agent()
+   ├─ Batch wait for parallel agents: wait({ ids: [a, b, c] })
+   └─ Consider keeping agents alive for send_input during refinement
+```
+
+### Completion Flow
+
+```
+Final synthesis:
+   ├─ Consolidate all findings into top ideas
+   ├─ Generate synthesis.json
+   ├─ Update brainstorm.md with final conclusions
+   ├─ close_agent for any remaining active agents
+   ├─ Offer follow-up options
+   └─ Archive session artifacts
+```
+
+---
+
+## Best Practices
+
+### Before Starting Brainstorm
+
+1. **Clear Topic Definition**: Detailed topics lead to better dimension identification
+2. **User Context**: Understanding preferences helps guide brainstorming intensity
+3. **Scope Understanding**: Being clear about time/scope expectations sets correct exploration level
+
+### During Brainstorming
+
+1. **Review Perspectives**: Check all three perspectives before refinement rounds
+2. **Document Assumptions**: Track what you think is true for correction later
+3. **Use Continue Mode**: Resume sessions to build on previous exploration
+4. **Embrace Conflicts**: Perspective conflicts often reveal important tradeoffs
+5. **Iterate Thoughtfully**: Each refinement round should meaningfully advance ideas
+
+### Codex Subagent Best Practices
+
+1. **Role Path, Not Content**: Pass `~/.codex/agents/*.md` path in message, let agent read itself
+2. **Parallel for Perspectives**: Use batch spawn + wait for 3 perspective agents
+3. **Delay close_agent for Refinement**: Keep perspective agents alive for `send_input` reuse
+4. **Batch wait**: Use `wait({ ids: [a, b, c] })` for parallel agents, not sequential waits
+5. **Handle Timeouts**: Check `results.timed_out` and decide: continue waiting or use partial results
+6. **Explicit Cleanup**: Always `close_agent` when done, even on errors (use try/finally pattern)
+7. **send_input vs spawn**: Prefer `send_input` for same-context deep-dive, `spawn` for new exploration angles
+
+### Documentation Practices
+
+1. **Evidence-Based**: Every idea should reference codebase patterns or feasibility analysis
+2. **Perspective Diversity**: Capture viewpoints from all three perspectives
+3. **Timeline Clarity**: Use clear timestamps for traceability
+4. **Evolution Tracking**: Document how ideas changed and evolved
+5. **Action Items**: Generate specific, implementable recommendations
+6. **Synthesis Quality**: Ensure convergent/conflicting themes are clearly documented
+
+---
+
+**Now execute the brainstorm-with-file workflow for topic**: $TOPIC