claude-code-workflow 6.3.28 → 6.3.29

package/.claude/commands/workflow/lite-lite-lite.md

@@ -10,63 +10,33 @@ allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Bash(*), mcp_
 ## Quick Start
 
 ```bash
-# Basic usage
 /workflow:lite-lite-lite "Fix the login bug"
-
-# Complex task
 /workflow:lite-lite-lite "Refactor payment module for multi-gateway support"
 ```
 
 **Core Philosophy**: Minimal friction, maximum velocity. No files, no artifacts - just analyze and execute.
 
-## What & Why
-
-### Core Concept
-
-**Zero-artifact workflow**: Clarify requirements → Auto-select tools → Mixed tool analysis → User decision → Direct execution. All state in memory, all decisions via AskUser.
+## Overview
 
-**vs multi-cli-plan**:
-- **multi-cli-plan**: Full artifacts (IMPL_PLAN.md, plan.json, synthesis.json)
-- **lite-lite-lite**: No files, direct in-memory flow, immediate execution
+**Zero-artifact workflow**: Clarify → Select Tools → Multi-Mode Analysis → Decision → Direct Execution
 
-### Value Proposition
-
-1. **Ultra-Fast**: No file I/O overhead, no session management
-2. **Smart Selection**: Auto-select optimal tool combination based on task
-3. **Interactive**: Key decisions validated via AskUser
-4. **Direct**: Analysis → Execution without intermediate artifacts
+**vs multi-cli-plan**: No IMPL_PLAN.md, plan.json, synthesis.json - all state in memory.
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
 ```
-Phase 1: Clarify Requirements
-   └─ Parse input → AskUser for missing details (if needed)
-
-Phase 2: Auto-Select Tools
-   └─ Analyze task → Match to tool strengths → Confirm selection
-
-Phase 3: Mixed Tool Analysis
-   └─ Execute selected tools in parallel → Aggregate results
-
-Phase 4: User Decision
-   ├─ Present analysis summary
-   ├─ AskUser: Execute / Refine / Change tools / Cancel
-   └─ Loop to Phase 3 if refinement needed
-
-Phase 5: Direct Execution
-   └─ Execute solution directly (no plan files)
+Phase 1: Clarify Requirements → AskUser for missing details
+Phase 2: Select Tools (CLI → Mode → Agent) → 3-step selection
+Phase 3: Multi-Mode Analysis → Execute with --resume chaining
+Phase 4: User Decision → Execute / Refine / Change / Cancel
+Phase 5: Direct Execution → No plan files, immediate implementation
 ```
 
-## Phase Details
+## Phase 1: Clarify Requirements
 
-### Phase 1: Clarify Requirements
-
-**Parse Task Description**:
 ```javascript
-// Extract intent from user input
 const taskDescription = $ARGUMENTS
 
-// Check if clarification needed
 if (taskDescription.length < 20 || isAmbiguous(taskDescription)) {
   AskUserQuestion({
     questions: [{
@@ -80,173 +50,72 @@ if (taskDescription.length < 20 || isAmbiguous(taskDescription)) {
     }]
   })
 }
-```
 
-**Quick ACE Context** (optional, for complex tasks):
-```javascript
-// Only if task seems to need codebase context
+// Optional: Quick ACE Context for complex tasks
 mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
   project_root_path: process.cwd(),
   query: `${taskDescription} implementation patterns`
 })
 ```
 
-### Phase 2: Auto-Select Analysis Tools
-
-**Tool Categories**:
+## Phase 2: Select Tools
 
-| Category | Source | Execution |
-|----------|--------|-----------|
-| **CLI Tools** | cli-tools.json | `ccw cli -p "..." --tool <name>` |
-| **Sub Agents** | Task tool | `Task({ subagent_type: "...", prompt: "..." })` |
+### Tool Definitions
 
-**Task Analysis Dimensions**:
+**CLI Tools** (from cli-tools.json):
 ```javascript
-function analyzeTask(taskDescription) {
-  return {
-    complexity: detectComplexity(taskDescription),  // simple, medium, complex
-    taskType: detectTaskType(taskDescription),      // bugfix, feature, refactor, analysis, etc.
-    domain: detectDomain(taskDescription),          // frontend, backend, fullstack
-    needsExecution: detectExecutionNeed(taskDescription)  // analysis-only vs needs-write
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**CLI Tools** (dynamically loaded from cli-tools.json):
-
-```javascript
-// Load CLI tools from config file
 const cliConfig = JSON.parse(Read("~/.claude/cli-tools.json"))
 const cliTools = Object.entries(cliConfig.tools)
   .filter(([_, config]) => config.enabled)
   .map(([name, config]) => ({
-    name,
-    type: 'cli',
+    name, type: 'cli',
     tags: config.tags || [],
     model: config.primaryModel,
     toolType: config.type  // builtin, cli-wrapper, api-endpoint
   }))
 ```
 
-**Tags** (user-defined in cli-tools.json, no fixed specification):
-
-Tags are completely user-defined. Users can create any tags that match their workflow needs.
-
-**Config Example** (cli-tools.json):
-```json
-{
-  "tools": {
-    "gemini": {
-      "enabled": true,
-      "tags": ["architecture", "reasoning", "performance"],
-      "primaryModel": "gemini-2.5-pro"
-    },
-    "codex": {
-      "enabled": true,
-      "tags": ["implementation", "fast"],
-      "primaryModel": "gpt-5.2"
-    },
-    "qwen": {
-      "enabled": true,
-      "tags": ["implementation", "chinese", "documentation"],
-      "primaryModel": "coder-model"
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**Sub Agents** (predefined, canExecute marks execution capability):
-
-```javascript
-const agents = [
-  { name: 'code-developer', type: 'agent', strength: 'Code implementation, test writing', canExecute: true },
-  { name: 'Explore', type: 'agent', strength: 'Fast code exploration', canExecute: false },
-  { name: 'cli-explore-agent', type: 'agent', strength: 'Dual-source deep analysis', canExecute: false },
-  { name: 'cli-discuss-agent', type: 'agent', strength: 'Multi-CLI collaborative verification', canExecute: false },
-  { name: 'debug-explore-agent', type: 'agent', strength: 'Hypothesis-driven debugging', canExecute: false },
-  { name: 'context-search-agent', type: 'agent', strength: 'Context collection', canExecute: false },
-  { name: 'test-fix-agent', type: 'agent', strength: 'Test execution and fixing', canExecute: true },
-  { name: 'universal-executor', type: 'agent', strength: 'General multi-step execution', canExecute: true }
-]
-```
+**Sub Agents**:
 
 | Agent | Strengths | canExecute |
 |-------|-----------|------------|
-| **code-developer** | Code implementation, test writing, incremental development | ✅ |
-| **Explore** | Fast code exploration, file search, pattern discovery | ❌ |
-| **cli-explore-agent** | Dual-source analysis (Bash+CLI), read-only exploration | ❌ |
-| **cli-discuss-agent** | Multi-CLI collaboration, cross-verification, solution synthesis | ❌ |
-| **debug-explore-agent** | Hypothesis-driven debugging, NDJSON logging, iterative verification | ❌ |
-| **context-search-agent** | Multi-layer file discovery, dependency analysis, conflict assessment | ❌ |
+| **code-developer** | Code implementation, test writing | ✅ |
+| **Explore** | Fast code exploration, pattern discovery | ❌ |
+| **cli-explore-agent** | Dual-source analysis (Bash+CLI) | ❌ |
+| **cli-discuss-agent** | Multi-CLI collaboration, cross-verification | ❌ |
+| **debug-explore-agent** | Hypothesis-driven debugging | ❌ |
+| **context-search-agent** | Multi-layer file discovery, dependency analysis | ❌ |
 | **test-fix-agent** | Test execution, failure diagnosis, code fixing | ✅ |
 | **universal-executor** | General execution, multi-domain adaptation | ✅ |
 
-**Three-Step Selection Flow** (CLI → Mode → Agent):
+**Analysis Modes**:
 
-```javascript
-// Step 1: Present CLI options from config (multiSelect for multi-CLI modes)
-function getCliDescription(cli) {
-  return cli.tags.length > 0 ? cli.tags.join(', ') : cli.model || 'general'
-}
+| Mode | Pattern | Use Case | minCLIs |
+|------|---------|----------|---------|
+| **Parallel** | `A \|\| B \|\| C → Aggregate` | Fast multi-perspective | 1+ |
+| **Sequential** | `A → B(resume) → C(resume)` | Incremental deepening | 2+ |
+| **Collaborative** | `A → B → A → B → Synthesize` | Multi-round refinement | 2+ |
+| **Debate** | `A(propose) → B(challenge) → A(defend)` | Adversarial validation | 2 |
+| **Challenge** | `A(analyze) → B(challenge)` | Find flaws and risks | 2 |
 
-const cliOptions = cliTools.map(cli => ({
-  label: cli.name,
-  description: getCliDescription(cli)
-}))
+### Three-Step Selection Flow
 
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Select CLIs (multiSelect)
 AskUserQuestion({
   questions: [{
-    question: "Select CLI tools for analysis (select 1-3 for collaboration modes)",
+    question: "Select CLI tools for analysis (1-3 for collaboration modes)",
     header: "CLI Tools",
-    options: cliOptions,
-    multiSelect: true  // Allow multiple selection for collaboration modes
+    options: cliTools.map(cli => ({
+      label: cli.name,
+      description: cli.tags.length > 0 ? cli.tags.join(', ') : cli.model || 'general'
+    })),
+    multiSelect: true
   }]
 })
-```
 
-```javascript
-// Step 2: Select Analysis Mode
-const analysisModes = [
-  {
-    name: 'parallel',
-    label: 'Parallel',
-    description: 'All CLIs analyze simultaneously, aggregate results',
-    minCLIs: 1,
-    pattern: 'A || B || C → Aggregate'
-  },
-  {
-    name: 'sequential',
-    label: 'Sequential',
-    description: 'Chain analysis: each CLI builds on previous via --resume',
-    minCLIs: 2,
-    pattern: 'A → B(resume A) → C(resume B)'
-  },
-  {
-    name: 'collaborative',
-    label: 'Collaborative',
-    description: 'Multi-round synthesis: CLIs take turns refining analysis',
-    minCLIs: 2,
-    pattern: 'A → B(resume A) → A(resume B) → Synthesize'
-  },
-  {
-    name: 'debate',
-    label: 'Debate',
-    description: 'Adversarial: CLI B challenges CLI A findings, A responds',
-    minCLIs: 2,
-    pattern: 'A(propose) → B(challenge, resume A) → A(defend, resume B)'
-  },
-  {
-    name: 'challenge',
-    label: 'Challenge',
-    description: 'Stress test: CLI B finds flaws/alternatives in CLI A analysis',
-    minCLIs: 2,
-    pattern: 'A(analyze) → B(challenge, resume A) → Evaluate'
-  }
-]
-
-// Filter modes based on selected CLI count
+// Step 2: Select Mode (filtered by CLI count)
 const availableModes = analysisModes.filter(m => selectedCLIs.length >= m.minCLIs)
-
 AskUserQuestion({
   questions: [{
     question: "Select analysis mode",
@@ -258,43 +127,24 @@ AskUserQuestion({
     multiSelect: false
   }]
 })
-```
-
-```javascript
-// Step 3: Present Agent options for execution
-const agentOptions = agents.map(agent => ({
-  label: agent.name,
-  description: agent.strength
-}))
 
+// Step 3: Select Agent for execution
 AskUserQuestion({
   questions: [{
     question: "Select Sub Agent for execution",
     header: "Agent",
-    options: agentOptions,
+    options: agents.map(a => ({ label: a.name, description: a.strength })),
     multiSelect: false
   }]
 })
-```
-
-**Selection Summary**:
-```javascript
-console.log(`
-## Selected Configuration
-
-**CLI Tools**: ${selectedCLIs.map(c => c.name).join(' → ')}
-**Analysis Mode**: ${selectedMode.label} - ${selectedMode.pattern}
-**Execution Agent**: ${selectedAgent.name} - ${selectedAgent.strength}
-
-> Mode determines how CLIs collaborate, Agent handles final execution
-`)
 
+// Confirm selection
 AskUserQuestion({
   questions: [{
     question: "Confirm selection?",
     header: "Confirm",
     options: [
-      { label: "Confirm and continue", description: `${selectedMode.label} mode with ${selectedCLIs.length} CLIs` },
+      { label: "Confirm and continue", description: `${selectedMode.label} with ${selectedCLIs.length} CLIs` },
       { label: "Re-select CLIs", description: "Choose different CLI tools" },
       { label: "Re-select Mode", description: "Choose different analysis mode" },
       { label: "Re-select Agent", description: "Choose different Sub Agent" }
@@ -304,409 +154,226 @@ AskUserQuestion({
 })
 ```
 
-### Phase 3: Multi-Mode Analysis
+## Phase 3: Multi-Mode Analysis
 
-**Mode-Specific Execution Patterns**:
+### Universal CLI Prompt Template
 
-#### Mode 1: Parallel (并行)
 ```javascript
-// All CLIs run simultaneously, no resume dependency
-async function executeParallel(clis, taskDescription) {
-  const promises = clis.map(cli => Bash({
-    command: `ccw cli -p "
-PURPOSE: Analyze and provide solution for: ${taskDescription}
-TASK: • Identify affected files • Analyze implementation approach • List specific changes needed
+// Unified prompt builder - used by all modes
+function buildPrompt({ purpose, tasks, expected, rules, taskDescription }) {
+  return `
+PURPOSE: ${purpose}: ${taskDescription}
+TASK: ${tasks.map(t => `• ${t}`).join(' ')}
 MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @**/*
-EXPECTED: Concise analysis with: 1) Root cause/approach 2) Files to modify 3) Key changes 4) Risks
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Focus on actionable insights
-" --tool ${cli.name} --mode analysis`,
-    run_in_background: true
-  }))
+EXPECTED: ${expected}
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | ${rules}
+`
+}
 
-  return await Promise.all(promises)
+// Execute CLI with prompt
+function execCLI(cli, prompt, options = {}) {
+  const { resume, background = false } = options
+  const resumeFlag = resume ? `--resume ${resume}` : ''
+  return Bash({
+    command: `ccw cli -p "${prompt}" --tool ${cli.name} --mode analysis ${resumeFlag}`,
+    run_in_background: background
+  })
 }
 ```
 
-#### Mode 2: Sequential (串联)
+### Prompt Presets by Role
+
+| Role | PURPOSE | TASKS | EXPECTED | RULES |
+|------|---------|-------|----------|-------|
+| **initial** | Initial analysis | Identify files, Analyze approach, List changes | Root cause, files, changes, risks | Focus on actionable insights |
+| **extend** | Build on previous | Review previous, Extend, Add insights | Extended analysis building on findings | Build incrementally, avoid repetition |
+| **synthesize** | Refine and synthesize | Review, Identify gaps, Synthesize | Refined synthesis with new perspectives | Add value not repetition |
+| **propose** | Propose comprehensive analysis | Analyze thoroughly, Propose solution, State assumptions | Well-reasoned proposal with trade-offs | Be clear about assumptions |
+| **challenge** | Challenge and stress-test | Identify weaknesses, Question assumptions, Suggest alternatives | Critique with counter-arguments | Be adversarial but constructive |
+| **defend** | Respond to challenges | Address challenges, Defend valid aspects, Propose refined solution | Refined proposal incorporating feedback | Be open to criticism, synthesize |
+| **criticize** | Find flaws ruthlessly | Find logical flaws, Identify edge cases, Rate criticisms | Critique with severity: [CRITICAL]/[HIGH]/[MEDIUM]/[LOW] | Be ruthlessly critical |
+
 ```javascript
-// Chain analysis: each CLI builds on previous via --resume
-async function executeSequential(clis, taskDescription) {
-  const results = []
-  let previousSessionId = null
+const PROMPTS = {
+  initial: { purpose: 'Initial analysis', tasks: ['Identify affected files', 'Analyze implementation approach', 'List specific changes'], expected: 'Root cause, files to modify, key changes, risks', rules: 'Focus on actionable insights' },
+  extend: { purpose: 'Build on previous analysis', tasks: ['Review previous findings', 'Extend analysis', 'Add new insights'], expected: 'Extended analysis building on previous', rules: 'Build incrementally, avoid repetition' },
+  synthesize: { purpose: 'Refine and synthesize', tasks: ['Review previous', 'Identify gaps', 'Add insights', 'Synthesize findings'], expected: 'Refined synthesis with new perspectives', rules: 'Build collaboratively, add value' },
+  propose: { purpose: 'Propose comprehensive analysis', tasks: ['Analyze thoroughly', 'Propose solution', 'State assumptions clearly'], expected: 'Well-reasoned proposal with trade-offs', rules: 'Be clear about assumptions' },
+  challenge: { purpose: 'Challenge and stress-test', tasks: ['Identify weaknesses', 'Question assumptions', 'Suggest alternatives', 'Highlight overlooked risks'], expected: 'Constructive critique with counter-arguments', rules: 'Be adversarial but constructive' },
+  defend: { purpose: 'Respond to challenges', tasks: ['Address each challenge', 'Defend valid aspects', 'Acknowledge valid criticisms', 'Propose refined solution'], expected: 'Refined proposal incorporating alternatives', rules: 'Be open to criticism, synthesize best ideas' },
+  criticize: { purpose: 'Stress-test and find weaknesses', tasks: ['Find logical flaws', 'Identify missed edge cases', 'Propose alternatives', 'Rate criticisms (High/Medium/Low)'], expected: 'Detailed critique with severity ratings', rules: 'Be ruthlessly critical, find every flaw' }
+}
+```
 
-  for (const cli of clis) {
-    const resumeFlag = previousSessionId ? `--resume ${previousSessionId}` : ''
+### Mode Implementations
 
-    const result = await Bash({
-      command: `ccw cli -p "
-PURPOSE: ${previousSessionId ? 'Build on previous analysis and deepen' : 'Initial analysis'}: ${taskDescription}
-TASK: • ${previousSessionId ? 'Review previous findings • Extend analysis • Add new insights' : 'Identify affected files • Analyze implementation approach'}
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @**/*
-EXPECTED: ${previousSessionId ? 'Extended analysis building on previous findings' : 'Initial analysis with root cause and approach'}
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | ${previousSessionId ? 'Build incrementally, avoid repetition' : 'Focus on actionable insights'}
-" --tool ${cli.name} --mode analysis ${resumeFlag}`,
-      run_in_background: false
-    })
+```javascript
+// Parallel: All CLIs run simultaneously
+async function executeParallel(clis, task) {
+  return await Promise.all(clis.map(cli =>
+    execCLI(cli, buildPrompt({ ...PROMPTS.initial, taskDescription: task }), { background: true })
+  ))
+}
 
+// Sequential: Each CLI builds on previous via --resume
+async function executeSequential(clis, task) {
+  const results = []
+  let prevId = null
+  for (const cli of clis) {
+    const preset = prevId ? PROMPTS.extend : PROMPTS.initial
+    const result = await execCLI(cli, buildPrompt({ ...preset, taskDescription: task }), { resume: prevId })
     results.push(result)
-    previousSessionId = extractSessionId(result)  // Extract session ID for next iteration
+    prevId = extractSessionId(result)
   }
-
   return results
 }
-```
 
-#### Mode 3: Collaborative (协同)
-```javascript
-// Multi-round synthesis: CLIs take turns refining analysis
-async function executeCollaborative(clis, taskDescription, rounds = 2) {
+// Collaborative: Multi-round synthesis
+async function executeCollaborative(clis, task, rounds = 2) {
   const results = []
-  let previousSessionId = null
-
-  for (let round = 0; round < rounds; round++) {
+  let prevId = null
+  for (let r = 0; r < rounds; r++) {
     for (const cli of clis) {
-      const resumeFlag = previousSessionId ? `--resume ${previousSessionId}` : ''
-      const roundContext = round === 0 ? 'Initial analysis' : `Round ${round + 1}: Refine and synthesize`
-
-      const result = await Bash({
-        command: `ccw cli -p "
-PURPOSE: ${roundContext} for: ${taskDescription}
-TASK: • ${round === 0 ? 'Initial analysis of the problem' : 'Review previous analysis • Identify gaps • Add complementary insights • Synthesize findings'}
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @**/*
-EXPECTED: ${round === 0 ? 'Foundational analysis' : 'Refined synthesis with new perspectives'}
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | ${round === 0 ? 'Be thorough' : 'Build collaboratively, add value not repetition'}
-" --tool ${cli.name} --mode analysis ${resumeFlag}`,
-        run_in_background: false
-      })
-
-      results.push({ cli: cli.name, round, result })
-      previousSessionId = extractSessionId(result)
+      const preset = !prevId ? PROMPTS.initial : PROMPTS.synthesize
+      const result = await execCLI(cli, buildPrompt({ ...preset, taskDescription: task }), { resume: prevId })
+      results.push({ cli: cli.name, round: r, result })
+      prevId = extractSessionId(result)
     }
   }
-
   return results
 }
-```
 
-#### Mode 4: Debate (辩论)
-```javascript
-// Adversarial: CLI B challenges CLI A findings, A responds
-async function executeDebate(clis, taskDescription) {
+// Debate: Propose → Challenge → Defend
+async function executeDebate(clis, task) {
   const [cliA, cliB] = clis
   const results = []
 
-  // Step 1: CLI A proposes initial analysis
-  const proposeResult = await Bash({
-    command: `ccw cli -p "
-PURPOSE: Propose comprehensive analysis for: ${taskDescription}
-TASK: • Analyze problem thoroughly • Propose solution approach • Identify implementation details • State assumptions clearly
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @**/*
-EXPECTED: Well-reasoned proposal with clear assumptions and trade-offs stated
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Be clear about assumptions and trade-offs
-" --tool ${cliA.name} --mode analysis`,
-    run_in_background: false
-  })
-  results.push({ phase: 'propose', cli: cliA.name, result: proposeResult })
-  const proposeSessionId = extractSessionId(proposeResult)
+  const propose = await execCLI(cliA, buildPrompt({ ...PROMPTS.propose, taskDescription: task }))
+  results.push({ phase: 'propose', cli: cliA.name, result: propose })
 
-  // Step 2: CLI B challenges the proposal
-  const challengeResult = await Bash({
-    command: `ccw cli -p "
-PURPOSE: Challenge and stress-test the previous analysis for: ${taskDescription}
-TASK: • Identify weaknesses in proposed approach • Question assumptions • Suggest alternative approaches • Highlight potential risks overlooked
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @**/*
-EXPECTED: Constructive critique with specific counter-arguments and alternatives
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Be adversarial but constructive, focus on improving the solution
-" --tool ${cliB.name} --mode analysis --resume ${proposeSessionId}`,
-    run_in_background: false
-  })
-  results.push({ phase: 'challenge', cli: cliB.name, result: challengeResult })
-  const challengeSessionId = extractSessionId(challengeResult)
+  const challenge = await execCLI(cliB, buildPrompt({ ...PROMPTS.challenge, taskDescription: task }), { resume: extractSessionId(propose) })
+  results.push({ phase: 'challenge', cli: cliB.name, result: challenge })
 
-  // Step 3: CLI A defends and refines
-  const defendResult = await Bash({
-    command: `ccw cli -p "
-PURPOSE: Respond to challenges and refine analysis for: ${taskDescription}
-TASK: • Address each challenge point • Defend valid aspects • Acknowledge valid criticisms • Propose refined solution incorporating feedback
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @**/*
-EXPECTED: Refined proposal that addresses criticisms and incorporates valid alternatives
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Be open to valid criticism, synthesize best ideas
-" --tool ${cliA.name} --mode analysis --resume ${challengeSessionId}`,
-    run_in_background: false
-  })
-  results.push({ phase: 'defend', cli: cliA.name, result: defendResult })
+  const defend = await execCLI(cliA, buildPrompt({ ...PROMPTS.defend, taskDescription: task }), { resume: extractSessionId(challenge) })
+  results.push({ phase: 'defend', cli: cliA.name, result: defend })
 
   return results
 }
-```
 
-#### Mode 5: Challenge (挑战)
-```javascript
-// Stress test: CLI B finds flaws/alternatives in CLI A analysis
-async function executeChallenge(clis, taskDescription) {
+// Challenge: Analyze → Criticize
+async function executeChallenge(clis, task) {
   const [cliA, cliB] = clis
   const results = []
 
-  // Step 1: CLI A provides initial analysis
-  const analyzeResult = await Bash({
-    command: `ccw cli -p "
-PURPOSE: Provide comprehensive analysis for: ${taskDescription}
-TASK: • Deep analysis of problem space • Propose implementation approach • List specific changes • Identify risks
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @**/*
-EXPECTED: Thorough analysis with clear reasoning
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Be thorough and explicit about reasoning
-" --tool ${cliA.name} --mode analysis`,
-    run_in_background: false
-  })
-  results.push({ phase: 'analyze', cli: cliA.name, result: analyzeResult })
-  const analyzeSessionId = extractSessionId(analyzeResult)
+  const analyze = await execCLI(cliA, buildPrompt({ ...PROMPTS.initial, taskDescription: task }))
+  results.push({ phase: 'analyze', cli: cliA.name, result: analyze })
 
-  // Step 2: CLI B challenges with focus on finding flaws
-  const challengeResult = await Bash({
-    command: `ccw cli -p "
-PURPOSE: Stress-test and find weaknesses in the analysis for: ${taskDescription}
-TASK: • Find logical flaws in reasoning • Identify missed edge cases • Propose better alternatives • Rate confidence in each criticism (High/Medium/Low)
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @**/*
-EXPECTED: Detailed critique with severity ratings: [CRITICAL] [HIGH] [MEDIUM] [LOW] for each issue found
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Be ruthlessly critical, find every possible flaw
-" --tool ${cliB.name} --mode analysis --resume ${analyzeSessionId}`,
-    run_in_background: false
-  })
-  results.push({ phase: 'challenge', cli: cliB.name, result: challengeResult })
+  const criticize = await execCLI(cliB, buildPrompt({ ...PROMPTS.criticize, taskDescription: task }), { resume: extractSessionId(analyze) })
+  results.push({ phase: 'challenge', cli: cliB.name, result: criticize })
 
   return results
 }
 ```
 
-**Mode Router**:
+### Mode Router & Result Aggregation
+
 ```javascript
 async function executeAnalysis(mode, clis, taskDescription) {
   switch (mode.name) {
-    case 'parallel':
-      return await executeParallel(clis, taskDescription)
-    case 'sequential':
-      return await executeSequential(clis, taskDescription)
-    case 'collaborative':
-      return await executeCollaborative(clis, taskDescription)
-    case 'debate':
-      return await executeDebate(clis, taskDescription)
-    case 'challenge':
-      return await executeChallenge(clis, taskDescription)
-    default:
-      return await executeParallel(clis, taskDescription)
+    case 'parallel': return await executeParallel(clis, taskDescription)
+    case 'sequential': return await executeSequential(clis, taskDescription)
+    case 'collaborative': return await executeCollaborative(clis, taskDescription)
+    case 'debate': return await executeDebate(clis, taskDescription)
+    case 'challenge': return await executeChallenge(clis, taskDescription)
   }
 }
 
-// Execute based on selected mode
-const analysisResults = await executeAnalysis(selectedMode, selectedCLIs, taskDescription)
-```
-
-**Result Aggregation** (mode-aware):
-```javascript
 function aggregateResults(mode, results) {
-  const base = {
-    mode: mode.name,
-    pattern: mode.pattern,
-    tools_used: results.map(r => r.cli || 'unknown')
-  }
+  const base = { mode: mode.name, pattern: mode.pattern, tools_used: results.map(r => r.cli || 'unknown') }
 
   switch (mode.name) {
     case 'parallel':
-      return {
-        ...base,
-        findings: results.map(r => parseOutput(r)),
-        consensus: findCommonPoints(results),
-        divergences: findDifferences(results)
-      }
-
+      return { ...base, findings: results.map(parseOutput), consensus: findCommonPoints(results), divergences: findDifferences(results) }
     case 'sequential':
-      return {
-        ...base,
-        evolution: results.map((r, i) => ({ step: i + 1, analysis: parseOutput(r) })),
-        finalAnalysis: parseOutput(results[results.length - 1])
-      }
-
+      return { ...base, evolution: results.map((r, i) => ({ step: i + 1, analysis: parseOutput(r) })), finalAnalysis: parseOutput(results.at(-1)) }
     case 'collaborative':
-      return {
-        ...base,
-        rounds: groupByRound(results),
-        synthesis: extractSynthesis(results[results.length - 1])
-      }
-
+      return { ...base, rounds: groupByRound(results), synthesis: extractSynthesis(results.at(-1)) }
     case 'debate':
-      return {
-        ...base,
-        proposal: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'propose')?.result),
+      return { ...base, proposal: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'propose')?.result),
         challenges: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'challenge')?.result),
-        resolution: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'defend')?.result),
-        confidence: calculateDebateConfidence(results)
-      }
-
+        resolution: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'defend')?.result), confidence: calculateDebateConfidence(results) }
     case 'challenge':
-      return {
-        ...base,
-        originalAnalysis: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'analyze')?.result),
-        critiques: parseCritiques(results.find(r => r.phase === 'challenge')?.result),
-        riskScore: calculateRiskScore(results)
-      }
+      return { ...base, originalAnalysis: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'analyze')?.result),
+        critiques: parseCritiques(results.find(r => r.phase === 'challenge')?.result), riskScore: calculateRiskScore(results) }
   }
 }
-
-const aggregatedAnalysis = aggregateResults(selectedMode, analysisResults)
 ```
 
-### Phase 4: User Decision
-
-**Present Mode-Specific Summary**:
+## Phase 4: User Decision
 
 ```javascript
-function presentSummary(aggregatedAnalysis) {
-  const { mode, pattern } = aggregatedAnalysis
-
-  console.log(`
-## Analysis Result Summary
+function presentSummary(analysis) {
+  console.log(`## Analysis Result\n**Mode**: ${analysis.mode} (${analysis.pattern})\n**Tools**: ${analysis.tools_used.join(' → ')}`)
 
-**Mode**: ${mode} (${pattern})
-**Tools**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.tools_used.join(' → ')}
-`)
-
-  switch (mode) {
+  switch (analysis.mode) {
     case 'parallel':
-      console.log(`
-### Consensus Points
-${aggregatedAnalysis.consensus.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n')}
-
-### Divergence Points
-${aggregatedAnalysis.divergences.map(d => `- ${d}`).join('\n')}
-`)
+      console.log(`### Consensus\n${analysis.consensus.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n')}\n### Divergences\n${analysis.divergences.map(d => `- ${d}`).join('\n')}`)
       break
-
     case 'sequential':
-      console.log(`
-### Analysis Evolution
-${aggregatedAnalysis.evolution.map(e => `**Step ${e.step}**: ${e.analysis.summary}`).join('\n')}
-
-### Final Analysis
-${aggregatedAnalysis.finalAnalysis.summary}
-`)
+      console.log(`### Evolution\n${analysis.evolution.map(e => `**Step ${e.step}**: ${e.analysis.summary}`).join('\n')}\n### Final\n${analysis.finalAnalysis.summary}`)
       break
-
     case 'collaborative':
-      console.log(`
-### Collaboration Rounds
-${Object.entries(aggregatedAnalysis.rounds).map(([round, analyses]) =>
-  `**Round ${round}**: ${analyses.map(a => a.cli).join(' + ')}`
-).join('\n')}
-
-### Synthesized Result
-${aggregatedAnalysis.synthesis}
-`)
+      console.log(`### Rounds\n${Object.entries(analysis.rounds).map(([r, a]) => `**Round ${r}**: ${a.map(x => x.cli).join(' + ')}`).join('\n')}\n### Synthesis\n${analysis.synthesis}`)
       break
-
     case 'debate':
-      console.log(`
-### Debate Summary
-**Proposal**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.proposal.summary}
-**Challenges**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.challenges.points?.length || 0} points raised
-**Resolution**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.resolution.summary}
-**Confidence**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.confidence}%
-`)
+      console.log(`### Debate\n**Proposal**: ${analysis.proposal.summary}\n**Challenges**: ${analysis.challenges.points?.length || 0} points\n**Resolution**: ${analysis.resolution.summary}\n**Confidence**: ${analysis.confidence}%`)
       break
-
     case 'challenge':
-      console.log(`
-### Challenge Summary
-**Original Analysis**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.originalAnalysis.summary}
-**Critiques Found**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.critiques.length} issues
-${aggregatedAnalysis.critiques.map(c => `- [${c.severity}] ${c.description}`).join('\n')}
-**Risk Score**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.riskScore}/100
-`)
+      console.log(`### Challenge\n**Original**: ${analysis.originalAnalysis.summary}\n**Critiques**: ${analysis.critiques.length} issues\n${analysis.critiques.map(c => `- [${c.severity}] ${c.description}`).join('\n')}\n**Risk Score**: ${analysis.riskScore}/100`)
       break
   }
 }
 
-presentSummary(aggregatedAnalysis)
-```
-
-**Decision Options**:
-```javascript
 AskUserQuestion({
   questions: [{
     question: "How to proceed?",
     header: "Next Step",
     options: [
-      { label: "Execute directly", description: "Implement immediately based on analysis" },
-      { label: "Refine analysis", description: "Provide more constraints, re-analyze" },
-      { label: "Change tools", description: "Select different tool combination" },
-      { label: "Cancel", description: "End current workflow" }
+      { label: "Execute directly", description: "Implement immediately" },
+      { label: "Refine analysis", description: "Add constraints, re-analyze" },
+      { label: "Change tools", description: "Different tool combination" },
+      { label: "Cancel", description: "End workflow" }
     ],
     multiSelect: false
   }]
 })
+// Routing: Execute → Phase 5 | Refine → Phase 3 | Change → Phase 2 | Cancel → End
 ```
 
-**Routing Logic**:
-- **Execute directly** → Phase 5
-- **Refine analysis** → Collect feedback, return to Phase 3
-- **Change tools** → Return to Phase 2
-- **Cancel** → End workflow
-
-### Phase 5: Direct Execution
+## Phase 5: Direct Execution
 
-**No Artifacts - Direct Implementation**:
 ```javascript
-// Use the aggregated analysis directly
-// No IMPL_PLAN.md, no plan.json, no session files
-
-console.log("Starting direct execution based on analysis...")
-
-// Execution-capable agents (canExecute: true)
+// No IMPL_PLAN.md, no plan.json - direct implementation
 const executionAgents = agents.filter(a => a.canExecute)
-
-// Select execution tool: prefer execution-capable agent, fallback to CLI
-const executionTool = selectedTools.find(t =>
-  t.type === 'agent' && executionAgents.some(ea => ea.name === t.name)
-) || selectedTools.find(t => t.type === 'cli')
+const executionTool = selectedAgent.canExecute ? selectedAgent : selectedCLIs[0]
 
 if (executionTool.type === 'agent') {
-  // Use Agent for execution (preferred if available)
   Task({
     subagent_type: executionTool.name,
     run_in_background: false,
     description: `Execute: ${taskDescription.slice(0, 30)}`,
-    prompt: `
-## Task
-${taskDescription}
-
-## Analysis Results (from previous tools)
-${JSON.stringify(aggregatedAnalysis, null, 2)}
-
-## Instructions
-Based on the analysis above, implement the solution:
-1. Apply changes to identified files
-2. Follow the recommended approach
-3. Handle identified risks
-4. Verify changes work correctly
-`
+    prompt: `## Task\n${taskDescription}\n\n## Analysis Results\n${JSON.stringify(aggregatedAnalysis, null, 2)}\n\n## Instructions\n1. Apply changes to identified files\n2. Follow recommended approach\n3. Handle identified risks\n4. Verify changes work correctly`
   })
 } else {
-  // Use CLI with write mode
   Bash({
     command: `ccw cli -p "
-PURPOSE: Implement the solution based on analysis: ${taskDescription}
+PURPOSE: Implement solution: ${taskDescription}
 TASK: ${extractedTasks.join(' • ')}
 MODE: write
 CONTEXT: @${affectedFiles.join(' @')}
 EXPECTED: Working implementation with all changes applied
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md) | Apply analysis findings directly
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md)
 " --tool ${executionTool.name} --mode write`,
     run_in_background: false
   })
@@ -718,81 +385,49 @@ RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md) | Ap
 ```javascript
 TodoWrite({ todos: [
   { content: "Phase 1: Clarify requirements", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Clarifying requirements" },
-  { content: "Phase 2: Auto-select tools", status: "pending", activeForm: "Analyzing task" },
-  { content: "Phase 3: Mixed tool analysis", status: "pending", activeForm: "Running analysis" },
+  { content: "Phase 2: Select tools", status: "pending", activeForm: "Selecting tools" },
+  { content: "Phase 3: Multi-mode analysis", status: "pending", activeForm: "Running analysis" },
   { content: "Phase 4: User decision", status: "pending", activeForm: "Awaiting decision" },
-  { content: "Phase 5: Direct execution", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing implementation" }
+  { content: "Phase 5: Direct execution", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing" }
 ]})
 ```
 
 ## Iteration Patterns
 
-### Pattern A: Direct Path (Most Common)
-```
-Phase 1 → Phase 2 (auto) → Phase 3 → Phase 4 (execute) → Phase 5
-```
-
-### Pattern B: Refinement Loop
-```
-Phase 3 → Phase 4 (refine) → Phase 3 → Phase 4 → Phase 5
-```
-
-### Pattern C: Tool Adjustment
-```
-Phase 2 (adjust) → Phase 3 → Phase 4 → Phase 5
-```
+| Pattern | Flow |
+|---------|------|
+| **Direct** | Phase 1 → 2 → 3 → 4(execute) → 5 |
+| **Refinement** | Phase 3 → 4(refine) → 3 → 4 → 5 |
+| **Tool Adjust** | Phase 2(adjust) → 3 → 4 → 5 |
 
 ## Error Handling
 
 | Error | Resolution |
 |-------|------------|
 | CLI timeout | Retry with secondary model |
-| No enabled tools | Load cli-tools.json, ask user to enable tools |
-| Task type unclear | Default to first available CLI + code-developer |
+| No enabled tools | Ask user to enable tools in cli-tools.json |
+| Task unclear | Default to first CLI + code-developer |
 | Ambiguous task | Force clarification via AskUser |
 | Execution fails | Present error, ask user for direction |
 
-## Analysis Modes Reference
-
-| Mode | Pattern | Use Case | CLI Count |
-|------|---------|----------|-----------|
-| **Parallel** | `A \|\| B \|\| C → Aggregate` | Fast multi-perspective analysis | 1+ |
-| **Sequential** | `A → B(resume) → C(resume)` | Deep incremental analysis | 2+ |
-| **Collaborative** | `A → B → A → B → Synthesize` | Multi-round refinement | 2+ |
-| **Debate** | `A(propose) → B(challenge) → A(defend)` | Stress-test solutions | 2 |
-| **Challenge** | `A(analyze) → B(challenge)` | Find flaws and risks | 2 |
-
-## Comparison
+## Comparison with multi-cli-plan
 
 | Aspect | lite-lite-lite | multi-cli-plan |
 |--------|----------------|----------------|
 | **Artifacts** | None | IMPL_PLAN.md, plan.json, synthesis.json |
-| **Session** | Stateless (uses --resume for chaining) | Persistent session folder |
-| **Tool Selection** | Multi-CLI + Agent via 3-step selection | Config-driven with fixed tools |
-| **Analysis Modes** | 5 modes (parallel/sequential/collaborative/debate/challenge) | Fixed synthesis rounds |
-| **CLI Collaboration** | Auto --resume chaining | Manual session management |
-| **Iteration** | Via AskUser | Via rounds/synthesis |
-| **Execution** | Direct | Via lite-execute |
-| **Best For** | Quick analysis, adversarial validation, rapid iteration | Complex multi-step implementations |
-
-## Best Practices
-
-1. **Be Specific**: Clear task description improves auto-selection accuracy
-2. **Trust Auto-Selection**: Algorithm matches task type to tool strengths
-3. **Adjust When Needed**: Use "Adjust tools" if auto-selection doesn't fit
-4. **Trust Consensus**: When tools agree, confidence is high
-5. **Iterate Fast**: Use refinement loop for complex requirements
-6. **Direct is Fast**: Skip artifacts when task is straightforward
+| **Session** | Stateless (--resume chaining) | Persistent session folder |
+| **Tool Selection** | 3-step (CLI → Mode → Agent) | Config-driven fixed tools |
+| **Analysis Modes** | 5 modes with --resume | Fixed synthesis rounds |
+| **Best For** | Quick analysis, adversarial validation | Complex multi-step implementations |
 
-## Related Commands
+## Post-Completion Expansion
 
-```bash
-# Full planning workflow
-/workflow:multi-cli-plan "complex task"
+完成后询问用户是否扩展为issue(test/enhance/refactor/doc)，选中项调用 `/issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}"`
 
-# Single CLI planning
-/workflow:lite-plan "task"
+## Related Commands
 
-# Direct execution
-/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory
+```bash
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "complex task"   # Full planning workflow
+/workflow:lite-plan "task"                # Single CLI planning
+/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory        # Direct execution
 ```