claude-code-workflow 6.3.18 → 6.3.19

package/.claude/skills/command-guide/reference/commands/workflow/brainstorm/artifacts.md

@@ -1,452 +0,0 @@
----
-name: artifacts
-description: Interactive clarification generating confirmed guidance specification through role-based analysis and synthesis
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge description [--count N]"
-allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
----
-
-## Overview
-
-Seven-phase workflow: **Context collection** → **Topic analysis** → **Role selection** → **Role questions** → **Conflict resolution** → **Final check** → **Generate specification**
-
-All user interactions use AskUserQuestion tool (max 4 questions per call, multi-round).
-
-**Input**: `"GOAL: [objective] SCOPE: [boundaries] CONTEXT: [background]" [--count N]`
-**Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md`
-**Core Principle**: Questions dynamically generated from project context + topic keywords, NOT generic templates
-
-**Parameters**:
-- `topic` (required): Topic or challenge description (structured format recommended)
-- `--count N` (optional): Number of roles to select (system recommends N+2 options, default: 3)
-
----
-
-## Quick Reference
-
-### Phase Summary
-
-| Phase | Goal | AskUserQuestion | Storage |
-|-------|------|-----------------|---------|
-| 0 | Context collection | - | context-package.json |
-| 1 | Topic analysis | 2-4 questions | intent_context |
-| 2 | Role selection | 1 multi-select | selected_roles |
-| 3 | Role questions | 3-4 per role | role_decisions[role] |
-| 4 | Conflict resolution | max 4 per round | cross_role_decisions |
-| 4.5 | Final check | progressive rounds | additional_decisions |
-| 5 | Generate spec | - | guidance-specification.md |
-
-### AskUserQuestion Pattern
-
-```javascript
-// Single-select (Phase 1, 3, 4)
-AskUserQuestion({
-  questions: [
-    {
-      question: "{问题文本}",
-      header: "{短标签}",  // max 12 chars
-      multiSelect: false,
-      options: [
-        { label: "{选项}", description: "{说明和影响}" },
-        { label: "{选项}", description: "{说明和影响}" },
-        { label: "{选项}", description: "{说明和影响}" }
-      ]
-    }
-    // ... max 4 questions per call
-  ]
-})
-
-// Multi-select (Phase 2)
-AskUserQuestion({
-  questions: [{
-    question: "请选择 {count} 个角色",
-    header: "角色选择",
-    multiSelect: true,
-    options: [/* max 4 options per call */]
-  }]
-})
-```
-
-### Multi-Round Execution
-
-```javascript
-const BATCH_SIZE = 4;
-for (let i = 0; i < allQuestions.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
-  const batch = allQuestions.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE);
-  AskUserQuestion({ questions: batch });
-  // Store responses before next round
-}
-```
-
----
-
-## Task Tracking
-
-**TodoWrite Rule**: EXTEND auto-parallel's task list (NOT replace/overwrite)
-
-**When called from auto-parallel**:
-- Find artifacts parent task → Mark "in_progress"
-- APPEND sub-tasks (Phase 0-5) → Mark each as completes
-- When Phase 5 completes → Mark parent "completed"
-- PRESERVE all other auto-parallel tasks
-
-**Standalone Mode**:
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Initialize session", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Initializing"},
-  {"content": "Phase 0: Context collection", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 0"},
-  {"content": "Phase 1: Topic analysis (2-4 questions)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 1"},
-  {"content": "Phase 2: Role selection", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 2"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3: Role questions (per role)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 3"},
-  {"content": "Phase 4: Conflict resolution", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 4"},
-  {"content": "Phase 4.5: Final clarification", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 4.5"},
-  {"content": "Phase 5: Generate specification", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 5"}
-]
-```
-
----
-
-## Execution Phases
-
-### Session Management
-
-- Check `.workflow/active/` for existing sessions
-- Multiple → Prompt selection | Single → Use it | None → Create `WFS-[topic-slug]`
-- Parse `--count N` parameter (default: 3)
-- Store decisions in `workflow-session.json`
-
-### Phase 0: Context Collection
-
-**Goal**: Gather project context BEFORE user interaction
-
-**Steps**:
-1. Check if `context-package.json` exists → Skip if valid
-2. Invoke `context-search-agent` (BRAINSTORM MODE - lightweight)
-3. Output: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.process/context-package.json`
-
-**Graceful Degradation**: If agent fails, continue to Phase 1 without context
-
-```javascript
-Task(
-  subagent_type="context-search-agent",
-  description="Gather project context for brainstorm",
-  prompt=`
-Execute context-search-agent in BRAINSTORM MODE (Phase 1-2 only).
-
-Session: ${session_id}
-Task: ${task_description}
-Output: .workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json
-
-Required fields: metadata, project_context, assets, dependencies, conflict_detection
-`
-)
-```
-
-### Phase 1: Topic Analysis
-
-**Goal**: Extract keywords/challenges enriched by Phase 0 context
-
-**Steps**:
-1. Load Phase 0 context (tech_stack, modules, conflict_risk)
-2. Deep topic analysis (entities, challenges, constraints, metrics)
-3. Generate 2-4 context-aware probing questions
-4. AskUserQuestion → Store to `session.intent_context`
-
-**Example**:
-```javascript
-AskUserQuestion({
-  questions: [
-    {
-      question: "实时协作平台的主要技术挑战？",
-      header: "核心挑战",
-      multiSelect: false,
-      options: [
-        { label: "实时数据同步", description: "100+用户同时在线，状态同步复杂度高" },
-        { label: "可扩展性架构", description: "用户规模增长时的系统扩展能力" },
-        { label: "冲突解决机制", description: "多用户同时编辑的冲突处理策略" }
-      ]
-    },
-    {
-      question: "MVP阶段最关注的指标？",
-      header: "优先级",
-      multiSelect: false,
-      options: [
-        { label: "功能完整性", description: "实现所有核心功能" },
-        { label: "用户体验", description: "流畅的交互体验和响应速度" },
-        { label: "系统稳定性", description: "高可用性和数据一致性" }
-      ]
-    }
-  ]
-})
-```
-
-**⚠️ CRITICAL**: Questions MUST reference topic keywords. Generic "Project type?" violates dynamic generation.
-
-### Phase 2: Role Selection
-
-**Goal**: User selects roles from intelligent recommendations
-
-**Available Roles**: data-architect, product-manager, product-owner, scrum-master, subject-matter-expert, system-architect, test-strategist, ui-designer, ux-expert
-
-**Steps**:
-1. Analyze Phase 1 keywords → Recommend count+2 roles with rationale
-2. AskUserQuestion (multiSelect=true) → Store to `session.selected_roles`
-3. If count+2 > 4, split into multiple rounds
-
-**Example**:
-```javascript
-AskUserQuestion({
-  questions: [{
-    question: "请选择 3 个角色参与头脑风暴分析",
-    header: "角色选择",
-    multiSelect: true,
-    options: [
-      { label: "system-architect", description: "实时同步架构设计和技术选型" },
-      { label: "ui-designer", description: "协作界面用户体验和状态展示" },
-      { label: "product-manager", description: "功能优先级和MVP范围决策" },
-      { label: "data-architect", description: "数据同步模型和存储方案设计" }
-    ]
-  }]
-})
-```
-
-**⚠️ CRITICAL**: User MUST interact. NEVER auto-select without confirmation.
-
-### Phase 3: Role-Specific Questions
-
-**Goal**: Generate deep questions mapping role expertise to Phase 1 challenges
-
-**Algorithm**:
-1. FOR each selected role:
-   - Map Phase 1 challenges to role domain
-   - Generate 3-4 questions (implementation depth, trade-offs, edge cases)
-   - AskUserQuestion per role → Store to `session.role_decisions[role]`
-2. Process roles sequentially (one at a time for clarity)
-3. If role needs > 4 questions, split into multiple rounds
-
-**Example** (system-architect):
-```javascript
-AskUserQuestion({
-  questions: [
-    {
-      question: "100+ 用户实时状态同步方案？",
-      header: "状态同步",
-      multiSelect: false,
-      options: [
-        { label: "Event Sourcing", description: "完整事件历史，支持回溯，存储成本高" },
-        { label: "集中式状态管理", description: "实现简单，单点瓶颈风险" },
-        { label: "CRDT", description: "去中心化，自动合并，学习曲线陡" }
-      ]
-    },
-    {
-      question: "两个用户同时编辑冲突如何解决？",
-      header: "冲突解决",
-      multiSelect: false,
-      options: [
-        { label: "自动合并", description: "用户无感知，可能产生意外结果" },
-        { label: "手动解决", description: "用户控制，增加交互复杂度" },
-        { label: "版本控制", description: "保留历史，需要分支管理" }
-      ]
-    }
-  ]
-})
-```
-
-### Phase 4: Conflict Resolution
-
-**Goal**: Resolve ACTUAL conflicts from Phase 3 answers
-
-**Algorithm**:
-1. Analyze Phase 3 answers for conflicts:
-   - Contradictory choices (e.g., "fast iteration" vs "complex Event Sourcing")
-   - Missing integration (e.g., "Optimistic updates" but no conflict handling)
-   - Implicit dependencies (e.g., "Live cursors" but no auth defined)
-2. Generate clarification questions referencing SPECIFIC Phase 3 choices
-3. AskUserQuestion (max 4 per call, multi-round) → Store to `session.cross_role_decisions`
-4. If NO conflicts: Skip Phase 4 (inform user: "未检测到跨角色冲突，跳过Phase 4")
-
-**Example**:
-```javascript
-AskUserQuestion({
-  questions: [{
-    question: "CRDT 与 UI 回滚期望冲突，如何解决？\n背景：system-architect选择CRDT，ui-designer期望回滚UI",
-    header: "架构冲突",
-    multiSelect: false,
-    options: [
-      { label: "采用 CRDT", description: "保持去中心化，调整UI期望" },
-      { label: "显示合并界面", description: "增加用户交互，展示冲突详情" },
-      { label: "切换到 OT", description: "支持回滚，增加服务器复杂度" }
-    ]
-  }]
-})
-```
-
-### Phase 4.5: Final Clarification
-
-**Purpose**: Ensure no important points missed before generating specification
-
-**Steps**:
-1. Ask initial check:
-   ```javascript
-   AskUserQuestion({
-     questions: [{
-       question: "在生成最终规范之前，是否有前面未澄清的重点需要补充？",
-       header: "补充确认",
-       multiSelect: false,
-       options: [
-         { label: "无需补充", description: "前面的讨论已经足够完整" },
-         { label: "需要补充", description: "还有重要内容需要澄清" }
-       ]
-     }]
-   })
-   ```
-2. If "需要补充":
-   - Analyze user's additional points
-   - Generate progressive questions (not role-bound, interconnected)
-   - AskUserQuestion (max 4 per round) → Store to `session.additional_decisions`
-   - Repeat until user confirms completion
-3. If "无需补充": Proceed to Phase 5
-
-**Progressive Pattern**: Questions interconnected, each round informs next, continue until resolved.
-
-### Phase 5: Generate Specification
-
-**Steps**:
-1. Load all decisions: `intent_context` + `selected_roles` + `role_decisions` + `cross_role_decisions` + `additional_decisions`
-2. Transform Q&A to declarative: Questions → Headers, Answers → CONFIRMED/SELECTED statements
-3. Generate `guidance-specification.md`
-4. Update `workflow-session.json` (metadata only)
-5. Validate: No interrogative sentences, all decisions traceable
-
----
-
-## Question Guidelines
-
-### Core Principle
-
-**Target**: 开发者（理解技术但需要从用户需求出发）
-
-**Question Structure**: `[业务场景/需求前提] + [技术关注点]`
-**Option Structure**: `标签：[技术方案] + 说明：[业务影响] + [技术权衡]`
-
-### Quality Rules
-
-**MUST Include**:
-- ✅ All questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
-- ✅ 业务场景作为问题前提
-- ✅ 技术选项的业务影响说明
-- ✅ 量化指标和约束条件
-
-**MUST Avoid**:
-- ❌ 纯技术选型无业务上下文
-- ❌ 过度抽象的用户体验问题
-- ❌ 脱离话题的通用架构问题
-
-### Phase-Specific Requirements
-
-| Phase | Focus | Key Requirements |
-|-------|-------|------------------|
-| 1 | 意图理解 | Reference topic keywords, 用户场景、业务约束、优先级 |
-| 2 | 角色推荐 | Intelligent analysis (NOT keyword mapping), explain relevance |
-| 3 | 角色问题 | Reference Phase 1 keywords, concrete options with trade-offs |
-| 4 | 冲突解决 | Reference SPECIFIC Phase 3 choices, explain impact on both roles |
-
----
-
-## Output & Governance
-
-### Output Template
-
-**File**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md`
-
-```markdown
-# [Project] - Confirmed Guidance Specification
-
-**Metadata**: [timestamp, type, focus, roles]
-
-## 1. Project Positioning & Goals
-**CONFIRMED Objectives**: [from topic + Phase 1]
-**CONFIRMED Success Criteria**: [from Phase 1 answers]
-
-## 2-N. [Role] Decisions
-### SELECTED Choices
-**[Question topic]**: [User's answer]
-- **Rationale**: [From option description]
-- **Impact**: [Implications]
-
-### Cross-Role Considerations
-**[Conflict resolved]**: [Resolution from Phase 4]
-- **Affected Roles**: [Roles involved]
-
-## Cross-Role Integration
-**CONFIRMED Integration Points**: [API/Data/Auth from multiple roles]
-
-## Risks & Constraints
-**Identified Risks**: [From answers] → Mitigation: [Approach]
-
-## Next Steps
-**⚠️ Automatic Continuation** (when called from auto-parallel):
-- auto-parallel assigns agents for role-specific analysis
-- Each selected role gets conceptual-planning-agent
-- Agents read this guidance-specification.md for context
-
-## Appendix: Decision Tracking
-| Decision ID | Category | Question | Selected | Phase | Rationale |
-|-------------|----------|----------|----------|-------|-----------|
-| D-001 | Intent | [Q] | [A] | 1 | [Why] |
-| D-002 | Roles | [Selected] | [Roles] | 2 | [Why] |
-| D-003+ | [Role] | [Q] | [A] | 3 | [Why] |
-```
-
-### File Structure
-
-```
-.workflow/active/WFS-[topic]/
-├── workflow-session.json              # Metadata ONLY
-├── .process/
-│   └── context-package.json           # Phase 0 output
-└── .brainstorming/
-    └── guidance-specification.md      # Full guidance content
-```
-
-### Session Metadata
-
-```json
-{
-  "session_id": "WFS-{topic-slug}",
-  "type": "brainstorming",
-  "topic": "{original user input}",
-  "selected_roles": ["system-architect", "ui-designer", "product-manager"],
-  "phase_completed": "artifacts",
-  "timestamp": "2025-10-24T10:30:00Z",
-  "count_parameter": 3
-}
-```
-
-**⚠️ Rule**: Session JSON stores ONLY metadata. All guidance content goes to guidance-specification.md.
-
-### Validation Checklist
-
-- ✅ No interrogative sentences (use CONFIRMED/SELECTED)
-- ✅ Every decision traceable to user answer
-- ✅ Cross-role conflicts resolved or documented
-- ✅ Next steps concrete and specific
-- ✅ No content duplication between .json and .md
-
-### Update Mechanism
-
-```
-IF guidance-specification.md EXISTS:
-  Prompt: "Regenerate completely / Update sections / Cancel"
-ELSE:
-  Run full Phase 0-5 flow
-```
-
-### Governance Rules
-
-- All decisions MUST use CONFIRMED/SELECTED (NO "?" in decision sections)
-- Every decision MUST trace to user answer
-- Conflicts MUST be resolved (not marked "TBD")
-- Next steps MUST be actionable
-- Topic preserved as authoritative reference
-
-**CRITICAL**: Guidance is single source of truth for downstream phases. Ambiguity violates governance.