claude-code-workflow 6.0.0

package/.claude/skills/command-guide/reference/commands/workflow/review-session-cycle.md

@@ -0,0 +1,805 @@
+---
+name: review-session-cycle
+description: Session-based comprehensive multi-dimensional code review. Analyzes git changes from workflow session across 7 dimensions with hybrid parallel-iterative execution, aggregates findings, and performs focused deep-dives on critical issues until quality gates met.
+argument-hint: "[session-id] [--dimensions=security,architecture,...] [--max-iterations=N]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Review-Session-Cycle Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Execute comprehensive session review (all 7 dimensions)
+/workflow:review-session-cycle
+
+# Review specific session with custom dimensions
+/workflow:review-session-cycle WFS-payment-integration --dimensions=security,architecture,quality
+
+# Specify session and iteration limit
+/workflow:review-session-cycle WFS-payment-integration --max-iterations=5
+```
+
+**Review Scope**: Git changes from session creation to present (via `git log --since`)
+**Session Requirement**: Requires active or completed workflow session
+**Output Directory**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/` (session-based)
+**Default Dimensions**: Security, Architecture, Quality, Action-Items, Performance, Maintainability, Best-Practices
+**Max Iterations**: 3 (adjustable via --max-iterations)
+**Default Iterations**: 1 (deep-dive runs once; use --max-iterations=0 to skip)
+**CLI Tools**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (fallback chain)
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+Session-based multi-dimensional code review orchestrator with **hybrid parallel-iterative execution** for comprehensive quality assessment of **git changes within a workflow session**.
+
+**Review Scope**:
+- **Session-based**: Reviews only files changed during the workflow session (via `git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}"`)
+- **For independent module review**: Use `/workflow:review-module-cycle` command instead
+
+**vs Standard Review**:
+- **Standard**: Sequential manual reviews → Inconsistent coverage → Missed cross-cutting concerns
+- **Review-Session-Cycle**: **Parallel automated analysis → Aggregate findings → Deep-dive critical issues** → Comprehensive coverage
+
+### Value Proposition
+1. **Comprehensive Coverage**: 7 specialized dimensions analyze all quality aspects simultaneously
+2. **Intelligent Prioritization**: Automatic identification of critical issues and cross-cutting concerns
+3. **Actionable Insights**: Deep-dive iterations provide step-by-step remediation plans
+4. **Real-time Visibility**: JSON-based progress tracking with interactive HTML dashboard
+
+### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
+- **ONLY command** for comprehensive multi-dimensional review
+- Manages: dimension coordination, aggregation, iteration control, progress tracking
+- Delegates: Code exploration and analysis to @cli-explore-agent, dimension-specific reviews via Deep Scan mode
+- **⚠️ DASHBOARD CONSTRAINT**: Dashboard is generated ONCE during Phase 1 initialization. After initialization, orchestrator and agents MUST NOT read, write, or modify dashboard.html - it remains static for user interaction only.
+
+## How It Works
+
+### Execution Flow (Simplified)
+
+```
+Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
+   └─ Validate session, initialize state, create output structure → Generate dashboard.html
+
+Phase 2: Parallel Reviews (for each dimension)
+   ├─ Launch 7 review agents simultaneously
+   ├─ Each executes CLI analysis via Gemini/Qwen
+   ├─ Generate dimension JSON + markdown reports
+   └─ Update review-progress.json
+
+Phase 3: Aggregation
+   ├─ Load all dimension JSON files
+   ├─ Calculate severity distribution (critical/high/medium/low)
+   ├─ Identify cross-cutting concerns (files in 3+ dimensions)
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ Critical findings OR high > 5 OR critical files → Phase 4 (Iterate)
+      └─ Else → Phase 5 (Complete)
+
+Phase 4: Iterative Deep-Dive (optional)
+   ├─ Select critical findings (max 5 per iteration)
+   ├─ Launch deep-dive agents for root cause analysis
+   ├─ Generate remediation plans with impact assessment
+   ├─ Re-assess severity based on analysis
+   └─ Loop until no critical findings OR max iterations
+
+Phase 5: Completion
+   └─ Finalize review-progress.json → Output dashboard path
+```
+
+### Agent Roles
+
+| Agent | Responsibility |
+|-------|---------------|
+| **Orchestrator** | Phase control, session discovery, state management, aggregation logic, iteration control |
+| **@cli-explore-agent** (Review) | Execute dimension-specific code analysis via Deep Scan mode, generate findings JSON with dual-source strategy (Bash + Gemini), create structured analysis reports |
+| **@cli-explore-agent** (Deep-dive) | Focused root cause analysis using dependency mapping, remediation planning with architectural insights, impact assessment, severity re-assessment |
+
+## Enhanced Features
+
+### 1. Review Dimensions Configuration
+
+**7 Specialized Dimensions** with priority-based allocation:
+
+| Dimension | Template | Priority | Timeout |
+|-----------|----------|----------|---------|
+| **Security** | 03-assess-security-risks.txt | 1 (Critical) | 60min |
+| **Architecture** | 02-review-architecture.txt | 2 (High) | 60min |
+| **Quality** | 02-review-code-quality.txt | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+| **Action-Items** | 02-analyze-code-patterns.txt | 2 (High) | 40min |
+| **Performance** | 03-analyze-performance.txt | 3 (Medium) | 60min |
+| **Maintainability** | 02-review-code-quality.txt* | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+| **Best-Practices** | 03-review-quality-standards.txt | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+
+*Custom focus: "Assess technical debt and maintainability"
+
+**Category Definitions by Dimension**:
+
+```javascript
+const CATEGORIES = {
+  security: ['injection', 'authentication', 'authorization', 'encryption', 'input-validation', 'access-control', 'data-exposure'],
+  architecture: ['coupling', 'cohesion', 'layering', 'dependency', 'pattern-violation', 'scalability', 'separation-of-concerns'],
+  quality: ['code-smell', 'duplication', 'complexity', 'naming', 'error-handling', 'testability', 'readability'],
+  'action-items': ['requirement-coverage', 'acceptance-criteria', 'documentation', 'deployment-readiness', 'missing-functionality'],
+  performance: ['n-plus-one', 'inefficient-query', 'memory-leak', 'blocking-operation', 'caching', 'resource-usage'],
+  maintainability: ['technical-debt', 'magic-number', 'long-method', 'large-class', 'dead-code', 'commented-code'],
+  'best-practices': ['convention-violation', 'anti-pattern', 'deprecated-api', 'missing-validation', 'inconsistent-style']
+};
+```
+
+### 2. Aggregation Logic
+
+**Cross-Cutting Concern Detection**:
+1. Files appearing in 3+ dimensions = **Critical Files**
+2. Same issue pattern across dimensions = **Systemic Issue**
+3. Severity clustering in specific files = **Hotspots**
+
+**Deep-Dive Selection Criteria**:
+- All critical severity findings (priority 1)
+- Top 3 high-severity findings in critical files (priority 2)
+- Max 5 findings per iteration (prevent overwhelm)
+
+### 3. Severity Assessment
+
+**Severity Levels**:
+- **Critical**: Security vulnerabilities, data corruption risks, system-wide failures, authentication/authorization bypass
+- **High**: Feature degradation, performance bottlenecks, architecture violations, significant technical debt
+- **Medium**: Code smells, minor performance issues, style inconsistencies, maintainability concerns
+- **Low**: Documentation gaps, minor refactoring opportunities, cosmetic issues
+
+**Iteration Trigger**:
+- Critical findings > 0 OR
+- High findings > 5 OR
+- Critical files count > 0
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Orchestrator
+
+**Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization**
+
+**Step 1: Session Discovery**
+```javascript
+// If session ID not provided, auto-detect
+if (!providedSessionId) {
+  // Check for active sessions
+  const activeSessions = Glob('.workflow/active/WFS-*');
+  if (activeSessions.length === 1) {
+    sessionId = activeSessions[0].match(/WFS-[^/]+/)[0];
+  } else if (activeSessions.length > 1) {
+    // List sessions and prompt user
+    error("Multiple active sessions found. Please specify session ID.");
+  } else {
+    error("No active session found. Create session first with /workflow:session:start");
+  }
+} else {
+  sessionId = providedSessionId;
+}
+
+// Validate session exists
+Bash(`test -d .workflow/active/${sessionId} && echo "EXISTS"`);
+```
+
+**Step 2: Session Validation**
+- Ensure session has implementation artifacts (check `.summaries/` or `.task/` directory)
+- Extract session creation timestamp from `workflow-session.json`
+- Use timestamp for git log filtering: `git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}"`
+
+**Step 3: Changed Files Detection**
+```bash
+# Get files changed since session creation
+git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u
+```
+
+**Step 4: Output Directory Setup**
+- Output directory: `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.review/`
+- Create directory structure:
+  ```bash
+  mkdir -p ${sessionDir}/.review/{dimensions,iterations,reports}
+  ```
+
+**Step 5: Initialize Review State**
+- State initialization: Create `review-state.json` with metadata, dimensions, max_iterations (merged metadata + state)
+- Progress tracking: Create `review-progress.json` for dashboard polling
+
+**Step 6: Dashboard Generation**
+
+**Constraints**:
+- **MANDATORY**: Dashboard MUST be generated from template: `~/.claude/templates/review-cycle-dashboard.html`
+- **PROHIBITED**: Direct creation or custom generation without template
+- **POST-GENERATION**: Orchestrator and agents MUST NOT read/write/modify dashboard.html after creation
+
+**Generation Commands** (3 independent steps):
+```bash
+# Step 1: Copy template to output location
+cp ~/.claude/templates/review-cycle-dashboard.html ${sessionDir}/.review/dashboard.html
+
+# Step 2: Replace SESSION_ID placeholder
+sed -i "s|{{SESSION_ID}}|${sessionId}|g" ${sessionDir}/.review/dashboard.html
+
+# Step 3: Replace REVIEW_TYPE placeholder
+sed -i "s|{{REVIEW_TYPE}}|session|g" ${sessionDir}/.review/dashboard.html
+
+# Step 4: Replace REVIEW_DIR placeholder
+sed -i "s|{{REVIEW_DIR}}|${reviewDir}|g" ${sessionDir}/.review/dashboard.html
+
+# Output: Start local server and output dashboard URL
+cd ${sessionDir}/.review && python -m http.server 8765 --bind 127.0.0.1 &
+echo "📊 Dashboard: http://127.0.0.1:8765/dashboard.html"
+echo "   (Press Ctrl+C to stop server when done)"
+```
+
+**Step 7: TodoWrite Initialization**
+- Set up progress tracking with hierarchical structure
+- Mark Phase 1 completed, Phase 2 in_progress
+
+**Phase 2: Parallel Review Coordination**
+- Launch 7 @cli-explore-agent instances simultaneously (Deep Scan mode)
+- Pass dimension-specific context (template, timeout, custom focus)
+- Monitor completion via review-progress.json updates
+- TodoWrite updates: Mark dimensions as completed
+- CLI tool fallback: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (on error/timeout)
+
+**Phase 3: Aggregation**
+- Load all dimension JSON files from dimensions/
+- Calculate severity distribution: Count by critical/high/medium/low
+- Identify cross-cutting concerns: Files in 3+ dimensions
+- Select deep-dive findings: Critical + high in critical files (max 5)
+- Decision logic: Iterate if critical > 0 OR high > 5 OR critical files exist
+- Update review-state.json with aggregation results
+
+**Phase 4: Iteration Control**
+- Check iteration count < max_iterations (default 3)
+- Launch deep-dive agents for selected findings
+- Collect remediation plans and re-assessed severities
+- Update severity distribution based on re-assessments
+- Record iteration in review-state.json
+- Loop back to aggregation if still have critical/high findings
+
+**Phase 5: Completion**
+- Finalize review-progress.json with completion statistics
+- Update review-state.json with completion_time and phase=complete
+- TodoWrite completion: Mark all tasks done
+- Output: Dashboard path to user
+
+
+
+### Session File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+├── review-state.json                    # Orchestrator state machine (includes metadata)
+├── review-progress.json                 # Real-time progress for dashboard
+├── dimensions/                          # Per-dimension results
+│   ├── security.json
+│   ├── architecture.json
+│   ├── quality.json
+│   ├── action-items.json
+│   ├── performance.json
+│   ├── maintainability.json
+│   └── best-practices.json
+├── iterations/                          # Deep-dive results
+│   ├── iteration-1-finding-{uuid}.json
+│   └── iteration-2-finding-{uuid}.json
+├── reports/                             # Human-readable reports
+│   ├── security-analysis.md
+│   ├── security-cli-output.txt
+│   ├── deep-dive-1-{uuid}.md
+│   └── ...
+└── dashboard.html                       # Interactive dashboard (primary output)
+```
+
+**Session Context**:
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/
+├── workflow-session.json
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+├── TODO_LIST.md
+├── .task/
+├── .summaries/
+└── .review/                             # Review results (this command)
+    └── (structure above)
+```
+
+### Review State JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Unified state machine and metadata (merged from metadata + state)
+
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-payment-integration",
+  "review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
+  "review_type": "session",
+  "metadata": {
+    "created_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:22Z",
+    "git_changes": {
+      "commit_range": "abc123..def456",
+      "files_changed": 15,
+      "insertions": 342,
+      "deletions": 128
+    },
+    "dimensions": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
+    "max_iterations": 3
+  },
+  "phase": "parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
+  "current_iteration": 1,
+  "dimensions_reviewed": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
+  "selected_strategy": "comprehensive",
+  "next_action": "execute_parallel_reviews|aggregate_findings|execute_deep_dive|generate_final_report|complete",
+  "severity_distribution": {
+    "critical": 2,
+    "high": 5,
+    "medium": 12,
+    "low": 8
+  },
+  "critical_files": [
+    {
+      "file": "src/payment/processor.ts",
+      "finding_count": 5,
+      "dimensions": ["security", "architecture", "quality"]
+    }
+  ],
+  "iterations": [
+    {
+      "iteration": 1,
+      "findings_analyzed": ["uuid-1", "uuid-2"],
+      "findings_resolved": 1,
+      "findings_escalated": 1,
+      "severity_change": {
+        "before": {"critical": 2, "high": 5, "medium": 12, "low": 8},
+        "after": {"critical": 1, "high": 6, "medium": 12, "low": 8}
+      },
+      "timestamp": "2025-01-25T14:30:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "completion_criteria": {
+    "target": "no_critical_findings_and_high_under_5",
+    "current_status": "in_progress",
+    "estimated_completion": "2 iterations remaining"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Field Descriptions**:
+- `phase`: Current execution phase (state machine pointer)
+- `current_iteration`: Iteration counter (used for max check)
+- `next_action`: Next step orchestrator should execute
+- `severity_distribution`: Aggregated counts across all dimensions
+- `critical_files`: Files appearing in 3+ dimensions with metadata
+- `iterations[]`: Historical log for trend analysis
+
+### Review Progress JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Real-time dashboard updates via polling
+
+```json
+{
+  "review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
+  "last_update": "2025-01-25T14:35:10Z",
+  "phase": "parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
+  "current_iteration": 1,
+  "progress": {
+    "parallel_review": {
+      "total_dimensions": 7,
+      "completed": 5,
+      "in_progress": 2,
+      "percent_complete": 71
+    },
+    "deep_dive": {
+      "total_findings": 6,
+      "analyzed": 2,
+      "in_progress": 1,
+      "percent_complete": 33
+    }
+  },
+  "agent_status": [
+    {
+      "agent_type": "review-agent",
+      "dimension": "security",
+      "status": "completed",
+      "started_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:00Z",
+      "completed_at": "2025-01-25T15:15:00Z",
+      "duration_ms": 2700000
+    },
+    {
+      "agent_type": "deep-dive-agent",
+      "finding_id": "sec-001-uuid",
+      "status": "in_progress",
+      "started_at": "2025-01-25T14:32:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "estimated_completion": "2025-01-25T16:00:00Z"
+}
+```
+
+### Agent Output Schemas
+
+**Agent-produced JSON files follow standardized schemas**:
+
+1. **Dimension Results** (cli-explore-agent output from parallel reviews)
+   - Schema: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-dimension-results-schema.json`
+   - Output: `.review-cycle/dimensions/{dimension}.json`
+   - Contains: findings array, summary statistics, cross_references
+
+2. **Deep-Dive Results** (cli-explore-agent output from iterations)
+   - Schema: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-deep-dive-results-schema.json`
+   - Output: `.review-cycle/iterations/iteration-{N}-finding-{uuid}.json`
+   - Contains: root_cause, remediation_plan, impact_assessment, reassessed_severity
+
+### Agent Invocation Template
+
+**Review Agent** (parallel execution, 7 instances):
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  description=`Execute ${dimension} review analysis via Deep Scan`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Conduct comprehensive ${dimension} code exploration and analysis using Deep Scan mode (Bash + Gemini dual-source strategy) for completed implementation in session ${sessionId}
+
+    ## Analysis Mode Selection
+    Use **Deep Scan mode** for this review:
+    - Phase 1: Bash structural scan for standard patterns (classes, functions, imports)
+    - Phase 2: Gemini semantic analysis for design intent, non-standard patterns, ${dimension}-specific concerns
+    - Phase 3: Synthesis with attribution (bash-discovered vs gemini-discovered findings)
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+    **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+    1. Read session metadata: ${sessionMetadataPath}
+    2. Read completed task summaries: bash(find ${summariesDir} -name "IMPL-*.md" -type f)
+    3. Get changed files: bash(cd ${workflowDir} && git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u)
+    4. Read review state: ${reviewStateJsonPath}
+    5. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-dimension-results-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+
+    ## Session Context
+    - Session ID: ${sessionId}
+    - Review Dimension: ${dimension}
+    - Review ID: ${reviewId}
+    - Implementation Phase: Complete (all tests passing)
+    - Output Directory: ${outputDir}
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini → qwen → codex (fallback chain)
+    - Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/${dimensionTemplate}
+    - Custom Focus: ${customFocus || 'Standard dimension analysis'}
+    - Timeout: ${timeout}ms
+    - Mode: analysis (READ-ONLY)
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+
+    **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 5, follow schema exactly
+
+    1. Dimension Results JSON: ${outputDir}/dimensions/${dimension}.json
+
+       **⚠️ CRITICAL JSON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+       Root structure MUST be array: \`[{ ... }]\` NOT \`{ ... }\`
+
+       Required top-level fields:
+       - dimension, review_id, analysis_timestamp (NOT timestamp/analyzed_at)
+       - cli_tool_used (gemini|qwen|codex), model, analysis_duration_ms
+       - summary (FLAT structure), findings, cross_references
+
+       Summary MUST be FLAT (NOT nested by_severity):
+       \`{ "total_findings": N, "critical": N, "high": N, "medium": N, "low": N, "files_analyzed": N, "lines_reviewed": N }\`
+
+       Finding required fields:
+       - id: format \`{dim}-{seq}-{uuid8}\` e.g., \`sec-001-a1b2c3d4\` (lowercase)
+       - severity: lowercase only (critical|high|medium|low)
+       - snippet (NOT code_snippet), impact (NOT exploit_scenario)
+       - metadata, iteration (0), status (pending_remediation), cross_references
+
+    2. Analysis Report: ${outputDir}/reports/${dimension}-analysis.md
+       - Human-readable summary with recommendations
+       - Grouped by severity: critical → high → medium → low
+       - Include file:line references for all findings
+
+    3. CLI Output Log: ${outputDir}/reports/${dimension}-cli-output.txt
+       - Raw CLI tool output for debugging
+       - Include full analysis text
+
+    ## Dimension-Specific Guidance
+    ${getDimensionGuidance(dimension)}
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] Schema obtained via cat review-dimension-results-schema.json
+    - [ ] All changed files analyzed for ${dimension} concerns
+    - [ ] All findings include file:line references with code snippets
+    - [ ] Severity assessment follows established criteria (see reference)
+    - [ ] Recommendations are actionable with code examples
+    - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+    - [ ] Report is comprehensive and well-organized
+  `
+)
+```
+
+**Deep-Dive Agent** (iteration execution):
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  description=`Deep-dive analysis for critical finding: ${findingTitle} via Dependency Map + Deep Scan`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Perform focused root cause analysis using Dependency Map mode (for impact analysis) + Deep Scan mode (for semantic understanding) to generate comprehensive remediation plan for critical ${dimension} issue
+
+    ## Analysis Mode Selection
+    Use **Dependency Map mode** first to understand dependencies:
+    - Build dependency graph around ${file} to identify affected components
+    - Detect circular dependencies or tight coupling related to this finding
+    - Calculate change risk scores for remediation impact
+
+    Then apply **Deep Scan mode** for semantic analysis:
+    - Understand design intent and architectural context
+    - Identify non-standard patterns or implicit dependencies
+    - Extract remediation insights from code structure
+
+    ## Finding Context
+    - Finding ID: ${findingId}
+    - Original Dimension: ${dimension}
+    - Title: ${findingTitle}
+    - File: ${file}:${line}
+    - Severity: ${severity}
+    - Category: ${category}
+    - Original Description: ${description}
+    - Iteration: ${iteration}
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+    **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+    1. Read original finding: ${dimensionJsonPath}
+    2. Read affected file: ${file}
+    3. Identify related code: bash(grep -r "import.*${basename(file)}" ${workflowDir}/src --include="*.ts")
+    4. Read test files: bash(find ${workflowDir}/tests -name "*${basename(file, '.ts')}*" -type f)
+    5. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-deep-dive-results-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini → qwen → codex
+    - Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
+    - Timeout: 2400000ms (40 minutes)
+    - Mode: analysis (READ-ONLY)
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+
+    **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 5, follow schema exactly
+
+    1. Deep-Dive Results JSON: ${outputDir}/iterations/iteration-${iteration}-finding-${findingId}.json
+
+       **⚠️ CRITICAL JSON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+       Root structure MUST be array: \`[{ ... }]\` NOT \`{ ... }\`
+
+       Required top-level fields:
+       - finding_id, dimension, iteration, analysis_timestamp
+       - cli_tool_used, model, analysis_duration_ms
+       - original_finding, root_cause, remediation_plan
+       - impact_assessment, reassessed_severity, confidence_score, cross_references
+
+       All nested objects must follow schema exactly - read schema for field names
+
+    2. Analysis Report: ${outputDir}/reports/deep-dive-${iteration}-${findingId}.md
+       - Detailed root cause analysis
+       - Step-by-step remediation plan
+       - Impact assessment and rollback strategy
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] Schema obtained via cat review-deep-dive-results-schema.json
+    - [ ] Root cause clearly identified with supporting evidence
+    - [ ] Remediation plan is step-by-step actionable with exact file:line references
+    - [ ] Each step includes specific commands and validation tests
+    - [ ] Impact fully assessed (files, tests, breaking changes, dependencies)
+    - [ ] Severity re-evaluation justified with evidence
+    - [ ] Confidence score accurately reflects certainty of analysis
+    - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+    - [ ] References include project-specific and external documentation
+  `
+)
+```
+
+### Dimension Guidance Reference
+
+```javascript
+function getDimensionGuidance(dimension) {
+  const guidance = {
+    security: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Input validation and sanitization
+      - Authentication and authorization mechanisms
+      - Data encryption (at-rest and in-transit)
+      - SQL/NoSQL injection vulnerabilities
+      - XSS, CSRF, and other web vulnerabilities
+      - Sensitive data exposure
+      - Access control and privilege escalation
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Authentication bypass, SQL injection, RCE, sensitive data exposure
+      - High: Missing authorization checks, weak encryption, exposed secrets
+      - Medium: Missing input validation, insecure defaults, weak password policies
+      - Low: Security headers missing, verbose error messages, outdated dependencies
+    `,
+    architecture: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Layering and separation of concerns
+      - Coupling and cohesion
+      - Design pattern adherence
+      - Dependency management
+      - Scalability and extensibility
+      - Module boundaries
+      - API design consistency
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Circular dependencies, god objects, tight coupling across layers
+      - High: Violated architectural principles, scalability bottlenecks
+      - Medium: Missing abstractions, inconsistent patterns, suboptimal design
+      - Low: Minor coupling issues, documentation gaps, naming inconsistencies
+    `,
+    quality: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Code duplication
+      - Complexity (cyclomatic, cognitive)
+      - Naming conventions
+      - Error handling patterns
+      - Code readability
+      - Comment quality
+      - Dead code
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Severe complexity (CC > 20), massive duplication (>50 lines)
+      - High: High complexity (CC > 10), significant duplication, poor error handling
+      - Medium: Moderate complexity (CC > 5), naming issues, code smells
+      - Low: Minor duplication, documentation gaps, cosmetic issues
+    `,
+    'action-items': `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Requirements coverage verification
+      - Acceptance criteria met
+      - Documentation completeness
+      - Deployment readiness
+      - Missing functionality
+      - Test coverage gaps
+      - Configuration management
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Core requirements not met, deployment blockers
+      - High: Significant functionality missing, acceptance criteria not met
+      - Medium: Minor requirements gaps, documentation incomplete
+      - Low: Nice-to-have features missing, minor documentation gaps
+    `,
+    performance: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - N+1 query problems
+      - Inefficient algorithms (O(n²) where O(n log n) possible)
+      - Memory leaks
+      - Blocking operations on main thread
+      - Missing caching opportunities
+      - Resource usage (CPU, memory, network)
+      - Database query optimization
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Memory leaks, O(n²) in hot path, blocking main thread
+      - High: N+1 queries, missing indexes, inefficient algorithms
+      - Medium: Suboptimal caching, unnecessary computations, lazy loading issues
+      - Low: Minor optimization opportunities, redundant operations
+    `,
+    maintainability: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Technical debt indicators
+      - Magic numbers and hardcoded values
+      - Long methods (>50 lines)
+      - Large classes (>500 lines)
+      - Dead code and commented code
+      - Code documentation
+      - Test coverage
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Massive methods (>200 lines), severe technical debt blocking changes
+      - High: Large methods (>100 lines), significant dead code, undocumented complex logic
+      - Medium: Magic numbers, moderate technical debt, missing tests
+      - Low: Minor refactoring opportunities, cosmetic improvements
+    `,
+    'best-practices': `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Framework conventions adherence
+      - Language idioms
+      - Anti-patterns
+      - Deprecated API usage
+      - Coding standards compliance
+      - Error handling patterns
+      - Logging and monitoring
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Severe anti-patterns, deprecated APIs with security risks
+      - High: Major convention violations, poor error handling, missing logging
+      - Medium: Minor anti-patterns, style inconsistencies, suboptimal patterns
+      - Low: Cosmetic style issues, minor convention deviations
+    `
+  };
+
+  return guidance[dimension] || 'Standard code review analysis';
+}
+```
+
+### Completion Conditions
+
+**Full Success**:
+- All dimensions reviewed
+- Critical findings = 0
+- High findings ≤ 5
+- Action: Generate final report, mark phase=complete
+
+**Partial Success**:
+- All dimensions reviewed
+- Max iterations reached
+- Still have critical/high findings
+- Action: Generate report with warnings, recommend follow-up
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Phase-Level Error Matrix**:
+
+| Phase | Error | Blocking? | Action |
+|-------|-------|-----------|--------|
+| Phase 1 | Session not found | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 1 | No completed tasks | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 1 | No changed files | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 2 | Single dimension fails | No | Log warning, continue other dimensions |
+| Phase 2 | All dimensions fail | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 3 | Missing dimension JSON | No | Skip in aggregation, log warning |
+| Phase 4 | Deep-dive agent fails | No | Skip finding, continue others |
+| Phase 4 | Max iterations reached | No | Generate partial report |
+
+**CLI Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → degraded mode
+
+**Fallback Triggers**:
+1. HTTP 429, 5xx errors, connection timeout
+2. Invalid JSON output (parse error, missing required fields)
+3. Low confidence score < 0.4
+4. Analysis too brief (< 100 words in report)
+
+**Fallback Behavior**:
+- On trigger: Retry with next tool in chain
+- After Codex fails: Enter degraded mode (skip analysis, log error)
+- Degraded mode: Continue workflow with available results
+
+### TodoWrite Structure
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed", activeForm: "Initializing" },
+    { content: "Phase 2: Parallel Reviews (7 dimensions)", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Reviewing" },
+    { content: "  → Security review", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Analyzing security" },
+    // ... other dimensions as sub-items
+    { content: "Phase 3: Aggregation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Aggregating" },
+    { content: "Phase 4: Deep-dive", status: "pending", activeForm: "Deep-diving" },
+    { content: "Phase 5: Completion", status: "pending", activeForm: "Completing" }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Default Settings Work**: 7 dimensions + 3 iterations sufficient for most cases
+2. **Parallel Execution**: ~60 minutes for full initial review (7 dimensions)
+3. **Trust Aggregation Logic**: Auto-selection based on proven heuristics
+4. **Monitor Logs**: Check reports/ directory for CLI analysis insights
+5. **Dashboard Polling**: Refresh every 5 seconds for real-time updates
+6. **Export Results**: Use dashboard export for external tracking tools
+
+## Related Commands
+
+### Automated Fix Workflow
+After completing a review, use the dashboard to select findings and export them for automated fixing:
+
+```bash
+# Step 1: Complete review (this command)
+/workflow:review-session-cycle
+
+# Step 2: Open dashboard, select findings, and export
+# Dashboard generates: fix-export-{timestamp}.json
+
+# Step 3: Run automated fixes
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/fix-export-{timestamp}.json
+```
+
+See `/workflow:review-fix` for automated fixing with smart grouping, parallel execution, and test verification.
+