claude-code-pilot 3.1.1 → 3.2.0

package/src/skills/android-clean-architecture/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
+---
+name: android-clean-architecture
+description: Clean Architecture patterns for Android and Kotlin Multiplatform projects — module structure, dependency rules, UseCases, Repositories, and data layer patterns.
+origin: ECC
+---
+
+# Android Clean Architecture
+
+Clean Architecture patterns for Android and KMP projects. Covers module boundaries, dependency inversion, UseCase/Repository patterns, and data layer design with Room, SQLDelight, and Ktor.
+
+## When to Activate
+
+- Structuring Android or KMP project modules
+- Implementing UseCases, Repositories, or DataSources
+- Designing data flow between layers (domain, data, presentation)
+- Setting up dependency injection with Koin or Hilt
+- Working with Room, SQLDelight, or Ktor in a layered architecture
+
+## Module Structure
+
+### Recommended Layout
+
+```
+project/
+├── app/                  # Android entry point, DI wiring, Application class
+├── core/                 # Shared utilities, base classes, error types
+├── domain/               # UseCases, domain models, repository interfaces (pure Kotlin)
+├── data/                 # Repository implementations, DataSources, DB, network
+├── presentation/         # Screens, ViewModels, UI models, navigation
+├── design-system/        # Reusable Compose components, theme, typography
+└── feature/              # Feature modules (optional, for larger projects)
+    ├── auth/
+    ├── settings/
+    └── profile/
+```
+
+### Dependency Rules
+
+```
+app → presentation, domain, data, core
+presentation → domain, design-system, core
+data → domain, core
+domain → core (or no dependencies)
+core → (nothing)
+```
+
+**Critical**: `domain` must NEVER depend on `data`, `presentation`, or any framework. It contains pure Kotlin only.
+
+## Domain Layer
+
+### UseCase Pattern
+
+Each UseCase represents one business operation. Use `operator fun invoke` for clean call sites:
+
+```kotlin
+class GetItemsByCategoryUseCase(
+    private val repository: ItemRepository
+) {
+    suspend operator fun invoke(category: String): Result<List<Item>> {
+        return repository.getItemsByCategory(category)
+    }
+}
+
+// Flow-based UseCase for reactive streams
+class ObserveUserProgressUseCase(
+    private val repository: UserRepository
+) {
+    operator fun invoke(userId: String): Flow<UserProgress> {
+        return repository.observeProgress(userId)
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### Domain Models
+
+Domain models are plain Kotlin data classes — no framework annotations:
+
+```kotlin
+data class Item(
+    val id: String,
+    val title: String,
+    val description: String,
+    val tags: List<String>,
+    val status: Status,
+    val category: String
+)
+
+enum class Status { DRAFT, ACTIVE, ARCHIVED }
+```
+
+### Repository Interfaces
+
+Defined in domain, implemented in data:
+
+```kotlin
+interface ItemRepository {
+    suspend fun getItemsByCategory(category: String): Result<List<Item>>
+    suspend fun saveItem(item: Item): Result<Unit>
+    fun observeItems(): Flow<List<Item>>
+}
+```
+
+## Data Layer
+
+### Repository Implementation
+
+Coordinates between local and remote data sources:
+
+```kotlin
+class ItemRepositoryImpl(
+    private val localDataSource: ItemLocalDataSource,
+    private val remoteDataSource: ItemRemoteDataSource
+) : ItemRepository {
+
+    override suspend fun getItemsByCategory(category: String): Result<List<Item>> {
+        return runCatching {
+            val remote = remoteDataSource.fetchItems(category)
+            localDataSource.insertItems(remote.map { it.toEntity() })
+            localDataSource.getItemsByCategory(category).map { it.toDomain() }
+        }
+    }
+
+    override suspend fun saveItem(item: Item): Result<Unit> {
+        return runCatching {
+            localDataSource.insertItems(listOf(item.toEntity()))
+        }
+    }
+
+    override fun observeItems(): Flow<List<Item>> {
+        return localDataSource.observeAll().map { entities ->
+            entities.map { it.toDomain() }
+        }
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### Mapper Pattern
+
+Keep mappers as extension functions near the data models:
+
+```kotlin
+// In data layer
+fun ItemEntity.toDomain() = Item(
+    id = id,
+    title = title,
+    description = description,
+    tags = tags.split("|"),
+    status = Status.valueOf(status),
+    category = category
+)
+
+fun ItemDto.toEntity() = ItemEntity(
+    id = id,
+    title = title,
+    description = description,
+    tags = tags.joinToString("|"),
+    status = status,
+    category = category
+)
+```
+
+### Room Database (Android)
+
+```kotlin
+@Entity(tableName = "items")
+data class ItemEntity(
+    @PrimaryKey val id: String,
+    val title: String,
+    val description: String,
+    val tags: String,
+    val status: String,
+    val category: String
+)
+
+@Dao
+interface ItemDao {
+    @Query("SELECT * FROM items WHERE category = :category")
+    suspend fun getByCategory(category: String): List<ItemEntity>
+
+    @Upsert
+    suspend fun upsert(items: List<ItemEntity>)
+
+    @Query("SELECT * FROM items")
+    fun observeAll(): Flow<List<ItemEntity>>
+}
+```
+
+### SQLDelight (KMP)
+
+```sql
+-- Item.sq
+CREATE TABLE ItemEntity (
+    id TEXT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
+    title TEXT NOT NULL,
+    description TEXT NOT NULL,
+    tags TEXT NOT NULL,
+    status TEXT NOT NULL,
+    category TEXT NOT NULL
+);
+
+getByCategory:
+SELECT * FROM ItemEntity WHERE category = ?;
+
+upsert:
+INSERT OR REPLACE INTO ItemEntity (id, title, description, tags, status, category)
+VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?);
+
+observeAll:
+SELECT * FROM ItemEntity;
+```
+
+### Ktor Network Client (KMP)
+
+```kotlin
+class ItemRemoteDataSource(private val client: HttpClient) {
+
+    suspend fun fetchItems(category: String): List<ItemDto> {
+        return client.get("api/items") {
+            parameter("category", category)
+        }.body()
+    }
+}
+
+// HttpClient setup with content negotiation
+val httpClient = HttpClient {
+    install(ContentNegotiation) { json(Json { ignoreUnknownKeys = true }) }
+    install(Logging) { level = LogLevel.HEADERS }
+    defaultRequest { url("https://api.example.com/") }
+}
+```
+
+## Dependency Injection
+
+### Koin (KMP-friendly)
+
+```kotlin
+// Domain module
+val domainModule = module {
+    factory { GetItemsByCategoryUseCase(get()) }
+    factory { ObserveUserProgressUseCase(get()) }
+}
+
+// Data module
+val dataModule = module {
+    single<ItemRepository> { ItemRepositoryImpl(get(), get()) }
+    single { ItemLocalDataSource(get()) }
+    single { ItemRemoteDataSource(get()) }
+}
+
+// Presentation module
+val presentationModule = module {
+    viewModelOf(::ItemListViewModel)
+    viewModelOf(::DashboardViewModel)
+}
+```
+
+### Hilt (Android-only)
+
+```kotlin
+@Module
+@InstallIn(SingletonComponent::class)
+abstract class RepositoryModule {
+    @Binds
+    abstract fun bindItemRepository(impl: ItemRepositoryImpl): ItemRepository
+}
+
+@HiltViewModel
+class ItemListViewModel @Inject constructor(
+    private val getItems: GetItemsByCategoryUseCase
+) : ViewModel()
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Result/Try Pattern
+
+Use `Result<T>` or a custom sealed type for error propagation:
+
+```kotlin
+sealed interface Try<out T> {
+    data class Success<T>(val value: T) : Try<T>
+    data class Failure(val error: AppError) : Try<Nothing>
+}
+
+sealed interface AppError {
+    data class Network(val message: String) : AppError
+    data class Database(val message: String) : AppError
+    data object Unauthorized : AppError
+}
+
+// In ViewModel — map to UI state
+viewModelScope.launch {
+    when (val result = getItems(category)) {
+        is Try.Success -> _state.update { it.copy(items = result.value, isLoading = false) }
+        is Try.Failure -> _state.update { it.copy(error = result.error.toMessage(), isLoading = false) }
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## Convention Plugins (Gradle)
+
+For KMP projects, use convention plugins to reduce build file duplication:
+
+```kotlin
+// build-logic/src/main/kotlin/kmp-library.gradle.kts
+plugins {
+    id("org.jetbrains.kotlin.multiplatform")
+}
+
+kotlin {
+    androidTarget()
+    iosX64(); iosArm64(); iosSimulatorArm64()
+    sourceSets {
+        commonMain.dependencies { /* shared deps */ }
+        commonTest.dependencies { implementation(kotlin("test")) }
+    }
+}
+```
+
+Apply in modules:
+
+```kotlin
+// domain/build.gradle.kts
+plugins { id("kmp-library") }
+```
+
+## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
+
+- Importing Android framework classes in `domain` — keep it pure Kotlin
+- Exposing database entities or DTOs to the UI layer — always map to domain models
+- Putting business logic in ViewModels — extract to UseCases
+- Using `GlobalScope` or unstructured coroutines — use `viewModelScope` or structured concurrency
+- Fat repository implementations — split into focused DataSources
+- Circular module dependencies — if A depends on B, B must not depend on A
+
+## References
+
+See skill: `compose-multiplatform-patterns` for UI patterns.
+See skill: `kotlin-coroutines-flows` for async patterns.

package/src/skills/api-connector-builder/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+---
+name: api-connector-builder
+description: Build a new API connector or provider by matching the target repo's existing integration pattern exactly. Use when adding one more integration without inventing a second architecture.
+origin: ECC direct-port adaptation
+version: "1.0.0"
+---
+
+# API Connector Builder
+
+Use this when the job is to add a repo-native integration surface, not just a generic HTTP client.
+
+The point is to match the host repository's pattern:
+
+- connector layout
+- config schema
+- auth model
+- error handling
+- test style
+- registration/discovery wiring
+
+## When to Use
+
+- "Build a Jira connector for this project"
+- "Add a Slack provider following the existing pattern"
+- "Create a new integration for this API"
+- "Build a plugin that matches the repo's connector style"
+
+## Guardrails
+
+- do not invent a new integration architecture when the repo already has one
+- do not start from vendor docs alone; start from existing in-repo connectors first
+- do not stop at transport code if the repo expects registry wiring, tests, and docs
+- do not cargo-cult old connectors if the repo has a newer current pattern
+
+## Workflow
+
+### 1. Learn the house style
+
+Inspect at least 2 existing connectors/providers and map:
+
+- file layout
+- abstraction boundaries
+- config model
+- retry / pagination conventions
+- registry hooks
+- test fixtures and naming
+
+### 2. Narrow the target integration
+
+Define only the surface the repo actually needs:
+
+- auth flow
+- key entities
+- core read/write operations
+- pagination and rate limits
+- webhook or polling model
+
+### 3. Build in repo-native layers
+
+Typical slices:
+
+- config/schema
+- client/transport
+- mapping layer
+- connector/provider entrypoint
+- registration
+- tests
+
+### 4. Validate against the source pattern
+
+The new connector should look obvious in the codebase, not imported from a different ecosystem.
+
+## Reference Shapes
+
+### Provider-style
+
+```text
+providers/
+  existing_provider/
+    __init__.py
+    provider.py
+    config.py
+```
+
+### Connector-style
+
+```text
+integrations/
+  existing/
+    client.py
+    models.py
+    connector.py
+```
+
+### TypeScript plugin-style
+
+```text
+src/integrations/
+  existing/
+    index.ts
+    client.ts
+    types.ts
+    test.ts
+```
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+- [ ] matches an existing in-repo integration pattern
+- [ ] config validation exists
+- [ ] auth and error handling are explicit
+- [ ] pagination/retry behavior follows repo norms
+- [ ] registry/discovery wiring is complete
+- [ ] tests mirror the host repo's style
+- [ ] docs/examples are updated if expected by the repo
+
+## Related Skills
+
+- `backend-patterns`
+- `mcp-server-patterns`
+- `github-ops`

package/src/skills/code-tour/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
+---
+name: code-tour
+description: Create CodeTour `.tour` files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs with real file and line anchors. Use for onboarding tours, architecture walkthroughs, PR tours, RCA tours, and structured "explain how this works" requests.
+origin: ECC
+---
+
+# Code Tour
+
+Create **CodeTour** `.tour` files for codebase walkthroughs that open directly to real files and line ranges. Tours live in `.tours/` and are meant for the CodeTour format, not ad hoc Markdown notes.
+
+A good tour is a narrative for a specific reader:
+- what they are looking at
+- why it matters
+- what path they should follow next
+
+Only create `.tour` JSON files. Do not modify source code as part of this skill.
+
+## When to Use
+
+Use this skill when:
+- the user asks for a code tour, onboarding tour, architecture walkthrough, or PR tour
+- the user says "explain how X works" and wants a reusable guided artifact
+- the user wants a ramp-up path for a new engineer or reviewer
+- the task is better served by a guided sequence than a flat summary
+
+Examples:
+- onboarding a new maintainer
+- architecture tour for one service or package
+- PR-review walk-through anchored to changed files
+- RCA tour showing the failure path
+- security review tour of trust boundaries and key checks
+
+## When NOT to Use
+
+| Instead of code-tour | Use |
+| --- | --- |
+| A one-off explanation in chat is enough | answer directly |
+| The user wants prose docs, not a `.tour` artifact | `documentation-lookup` or repo docs editing |
+| The task is implementation or refactoring | do the implementation work |
+| The task is broad codebase onboarding without a tour artifact | `codebase-onboarding` |
+
+## Workflow
+
+### 1. Discover
+
+Explore the repo before writing anything:
+- README and package/app entry points
+- folder structure
+- relevant config files
+- the changed files if the tour is PR-focused
+
+Do not start writing steps before you understand the shape of the code.
+
+### 2. Infer the reader
+
+Decide the persona and depth from the request.
+
+| Request shape | Persona | Suggested depth |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| "onboarding", "new joiner" | `new-joiner` | 9-13 steps |
+| "quick tour", "vibe check" | `vibecoder` | 5-8 steps |
+| "architecture" | `architect` | 14-18 steps |
+| "tour this PR" | `pr-reviewer` | 7-11 steps |
+| "why did this break" | `rca-investigator` | 7-11 steps |
+| "security review" | `security-reviewer` | 7-11 steps |
+| "explain how this feature works" | `feature-explainer` | 7-11 steps |
+| "debug this path" | `bug-fixer` | 7-11 steps |
+
+### 3. Read and verify anchors
+
+Every file path and line anchor must be real:
+- confirm the file exists
+- confirm the line numbers are in range
+- if using a selection, verify the exact block
+- if the file is volatile, prefer a pattern-based anchor
+
+Never guess line numbers.
+
+### 4. Write the `.tour`
+
+Write to:
+
+```text
+.tours/<persona>-<focus>.tour
+```
+
+Keep the path deterministic and readable.
+
+### 5. Validate
+
+Before finishing:
+- every referenced path exists
+- every line or selection is valid
+- the first step is anchored to a real file or directory
+- the tour tells a coherent story rather than listing files
+
+## Step Types
+
+### Content
+
+Use sparingly, usually only for a closing step:
+
+```json
+{ "title": "Next Steps", "description": "You can now trace the request path end to end." }
+```
+
+Do not make the first step content-only.
+
+### Directory
+
+Use to orient the reader to a module:
+
+```json
+{ "directory": "src/services", "title": "Service Layer", "description": "The core orchestration logic lives here." }
+```
+
+### File + line
+
+This is the default step type:
+
+```json
+{ "file": "src/auth/middleware.ts", "line": 42, "title": "Auth Gate", "description": "Every protected request passes here first." }
+```
+
+### Selection
+
+Use when one code block matters more than the whole file:
+
+```json
+{
+  "file": "src/core/pipeline.ts",
+  "selection": {
+    "start": { "line": 15, "character": 0 },
+    "end": { "line": 34, "character": 0 }
+  },
+  "title": "Request Pipeline",
+  "description": "This block wires validation, auth, and downstream execution."
+}
+```
+
+### Pattern
+
+Use when exact lines may drift:
+
+```json
+{ "file": "src/app.ts", "pattern": "export default class App", "title": "Application Entry" }
+```
+
+### URI
+
+Use for PRs, issues, or docs when helpful:
+
+```json
+{ "uri": "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/456", "title": "The PR" }
+```
+
+## Writing Rule: SMIG
+
+Each description should answer:
+- **Situation**: what the reader is looking at
+- **Mechanism**: how it works
+- **Implication**: why it matters for this persona
+- **Gotcha**: what a smart reader might miss
+
+Keep descriptions compact, specific, and grounded in the actual code.
+
+## Narrative Shape
+
+Use this arc unless the task clearly needs something different:
+1. orientation
+2. module map
+3. core execution path
+4. edge case or gotcha
+5. closing / next move
+
+The tour should feel like a path, not an inventory.
+
+## Example
+
+```json
+{
+  "$schema": "https://aka.ms/codetour-schema",
+  "title": "API Service Tour",
+  "description": "Walkthrough of the request path for the payments service.",
+  "ref": "main",
+  "steps": [
+    {
+      "directory": "src",
+      "title": "Source Root",
+      "description": "All runtime code for the service starts here."
+    },
+    {
+      "file": "src/server.ts",
+      "line": 12,
+      "title": "Entry Point",
+      "description": "The server boots here and wires middleware before any route is reached."
+    },
+    {
+      "file": "src/routes/payments.ts",
+      "line": 8,
+      "title": "Payment Routes",
+      "description": "Every payments request enters through this router before hitting service logic."
+    },
+    {
+      "title": "Next Steps",
+      "description": "You can now follow any payment request end to end with the main anchors in place."
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+## Anti-Patterns
+
+| Anti-pattern | Fix |
+| --- | --- |
+| Flat file listing | Tell a story with dependency between steps |
+| Generic descriptions | Name the concrete code path or pattern |
+| Guessed anchors | Verify every file and line first |
+| Too many steps for a quick tour | Cut aggressively |
+| First step is content-only | Anchor the first step to a real file or directory |
+| Persona mismatch | Write for the actual reader, not a generic engineer |
+
+## Best Practices
+
+- keep step count proportional to repo size and persona depth
+- use directory steps for orientation, file steps for substance
+- for PR tours, cover changed files first
+- for monorepos, scope to the relevant packages instead of touring everything
+- close with what the reader can now do, not a recap
+
+## Related Skills
+
+- `codebase-onboarding`
+- `coding-standards`
+- `council`
+- official upstream format: `microsoft/codetour`