ciphermesh 2.12.0 → 2.13.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -3,6 +3,124 @@
3
3
  Notable changes per release. Older versions are reconstructed from the git
4
4
  history — the commit bodies and pull requests remain the fuller record.
5
5
 
6
+ ## 2.13.0
7
+
8
+ **Multi-device.** One identity, several devices, and none of them holding a copy
9
+ of the others' secrets.
10
+
11
+ Until now two machines could only share an identity by sharing its private key —
12
+ `/backup` copies the whole thing — after which the relay refused the second
13
+ nickname, each message reached exactly one of them, and a peer verifying both
14
+ was shown the same fingerprint twice and told that was normal. That is replaced.
15
+
16
+ An identity is now an Ed25519 key that only ever signs. Each device has its own
17
+ message key, listed and signed by that identity. Adding a device grants it a
18
+ signed place on the list; it never receives the identity secret, so a stolen
19
+ phone is a stolen phone rather than a stolen identity, and only the device
20
+ holding the secret can add or remove.
21
+
22
+ `/room` also learned to say how the room is sending, and why.
23
+
24
+ ### Added
25
+
26
+ - **`/device`: one identity, several devices.** A second device asks with
27
+ `/device request`, the device holding the identity key answers with
28
+ `/device add`, and the new one takes it with `/device accept`. Two short
29
+ strings, small enough for a QR code, and neither of them secret — a request is
30
+ a public key and a grant is a signed statement that goes to every peer anyway.
31
+
32
+ The identity secret never moves. A secondary can prove which identity it
33
+ belongs to and can publish that proof, but it cannot sign a new list, so
34
+ adding and removing stay with one device. Two costs come with that and are
35
+ worth knowing: losing that device means no more adding or removing, and a
36
+ secondary does not rotate its message key, because it could not re-sign the
37
+ list that names it.
38
+
39
+ `/device remove` signs a shorter list **and rotates the room**. A removed
40
+ device still holds every member's sender chain, and a chain ratchets forward —
41
+ dropping it from a list stops the relay delivering to it and does not stop it
42
+ reading. It keeps what it already received; that is what forward secrecy
43
+ means.
44
+
45
+ - **Verification follows the identity, not the device.** Once both sides can,
46
+ `/verify` compares identity keys, so adding or rotating a device no longer
47
+ invalidates a verification. The switch is symmetric — both sides make it
48
+ together — so a pair is never shown two different codes, and `/verify` says
49
+ which of the two it is showing. Verifications you already have are carried
50
+ across silently, and only when a signed list names the very key you compared
51
+ digits over.
52
+
53
+ - **Another of someone's devices is not "their key changed".** It still warns
54
+ the first time, because claiming an identity proves nothing on its own. When
55
+ the proof arrives the warning is answered out loud, and that key is quiet from
56
+ then on. Your own other device is recognised as yours: `/users` counts people
57
+ rather than connections, a line you sent from your phone is shown as yours,
58
+ and your own nickname in your own line does not notify you.
59
+
60
+ - **`/room` reports how the room is sending, and why.** One ciphertext for the
61
+ room, or one envelope per member — and when it is the expensive one, the
62
+ reason: an older hub, deniable mode, or the peers by name.
63
+
64
+ ```
65
+ Sending: one ciphertext to the room (sender keys), read by 4
66
+ Sending: 4 envelopes per message — carol is on a build without sender keys
67
+ Sending: 2 envelopes per message — this relay cannot fan out a room-addressed message
68
+ ```
69
+
70
+ An older hub is reported ahead of older peers, because both can be true at
71
+ once and naming peers who are perfectly current sends you after the wrong
72
+ problem. P2P gets the same line for its own reasons: a mesh sends one frame
73
+ per peer either way, so there the saving is *encryptions*, and constant cover
74
+ is a reason to stay pairwise that the relay path does not have.
75
+
76
+ ### Fixed
77
+
78
+ - **A second device no longer reads as an attack.** It arrives under the same
79
+ nickname with a key the trust record has never seen, which is the shape of a
80
+ man-in-the-middle and was reported as one.
81
+
82
+ - **Guarded key memory is released, not merely zeroed.** `KeyManager` zeroed its
83
+ secret keys on `destroy()` and left the pages `mlock`'d until the garbage
84
+ collector happened to run the finaliser. An operating system caps how much a
85
+ process may lock, and the cap is small on Linux and unlimited on macOS — so
86
+ the failure was invisible in development and landed as an abort in whatever
87
+ allocated next. The same pattern was fixed elsewhere in 2.12.0; this is the
88
+ rest of it in that file.
89
+
90
+ ### Internal
91
+
92
+ - **The per-peer send loop is not being retired, and the plan that said it might
93
+ be was wrong.** It was written up as a compatibility shim that ages out once
94
+ everybody upgrades. It is not: it is the pairwise send path, and two of the
95
+ four things that need it need it permanently — `/deniable`, because
96
+ deniability is a property of the pairwise construction, and sender-key
97
+ distribution, because a distribution is authenticated by the envelope it
98
+ arrives in and the group path cannot bootstrap itself. Recorded in
99
+ `docs/design/sender-keys-on-relay.md`.
100
+
101
+ - **A design document for multi-device**, written from the code before any of
102
+ it moved, and kept as written with the decisions recorded in place. It is the
103
+ reason the arc could be built in eight landable steps.
104
+
105
+ - **One nickname may be held by several devices of one identity.** The relay
106
+ admits the second only if its JOIN carries a list signed by the identity the
107
+ name is already using and naming that JOIN's own key. No challenge is issued
108
+ and none is needed: replaying somebody else's list buys a seat in a room whose
109
+ messages you cannot read. The name is released when the last device leaves.
110
+
111
+ - **New capability `dl1`**, the first with no relay half — a device list travels
112
+ on the pairwise channel the relay already carries, so there is nothing for it
113
+ to agree to.
114
+
115
+ - **Multi-device is not coming to the mesh**, and the mesh now says so. A P2P
116
+ peer is keyed by nickname, which is exactly what two of your devices share, so
117
+ it is a different design. `/device`, `/create`, `/invite` and `/nick` explain
118
+ why they need a relay instead of guessing at a typo — `/device` used to
119
+ suggest `/voice`.
120
+
121
+ - Dependency bumps: `@noble/post-quantum` 0.7.0, `eslint` 10.8.1,
122
+ `globals` 17.11.0.
123
+
6
124
  ## 2.12.0
7
125
 
8
126
  Sender keys now send. 2.11.0 shipped the half that reads a group message; this
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ software was built for.
225
225
  | `/leave [room]` | Leave a room; its buffer closes (the last room is protected) |
226
226
  | `/create <room> <password>` | Create a **private room** 🔒 — see below |
227
227
  | `/rooms` | List rooms (🔒 marks private ones) |
228
- | `/room` | Current room + your buffer list |
228
+ | `/room` | Current room, how it is sending it, and your buffer list |
229
229
  | `/topic [text\|clear]` | Show or set the room topic — shown in the status bar and synced to whoever joins later |
230
230
  | `/owner` | Room owner |
231
231
  | `/kick` `/mute` `/ban` | Owner moderation — bound to the public key, so a rename does not undo a ban |
@@ -251,12 +251,13 @@ without verifying couldn't read a word. Share the password out-of-band.
251
251
 
252
252
  | Command | Description |
253
253
  | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
254
- | `/fingerprint [nick]` | Key fingerprint + a deterministic **randomart** picture of the key |
255
- | `/verify <nick>` | SAS code (~40-bit) + QR + key randomart for out-of-band verification |
254
+ | `/fingerprint [nick]` | Key fingerprint, the identity fingerprint when there is one, and a deterministic **randomart** picture of the key |
255
+ | `/verify <nick>` | SAS code (~40-bit) + QR + key randomart for out-of-band verification; says whether the code is over identity keys or device keys |
256
256
  | `/verify-confirm <nick>` | Mark peer as verified |
257
257
  | `/trust <nick>` / `/trustlist` | Accept new key / trust status |
258
258
  | `/contacts [add\|remove\|all]` | Contact book — persistent aliases on trust records ("this fingerprint is João"); shows in `/users`, rides along in identity backups |
259
259
  | `/backup [path]` | Encrypted backup of identity + verified peers (restore at startup) |
260
+ | `/device [list\|request\|add\|accept\|remove]` | Your devices under one identity. The identity key never leaves the device that holds it, so a second device is granted a signed place on the list rather than a copy of your identity. Removing one rotates the room, so nothing said afterwards reaches it |
260
261
  | `/deniable [on\|off]` | Plausible-deniability mode |
261
262
  | `/lock` / `/autolock <min\|off>` | Lock the screen behind the session passphrase — manually or after idle time (`autoLock` in config). Privacy for the "stepped away" moment; `/panic` is for the worst one |
262
263
  | `/panic [yes]` | Duress wipe — securely erase all on-disk secrets (session, history, trust, keys) and exit |
package/README.pt-BR.md CHANGED
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ aquela para a qual este software foi feito.
226
226
  | `/leave [sala]` | Sai de uma sala; o buffer fecha (a última sala é protegida) |
227
227
  | `/create <sala> <senha>` | Cria uma **sala privada** 🔒 — veja abaixo |
228
228
  | `/rooms` | Lista salas (🔒 marca as privadas) |
229
- | `/room` | Sala atual + sua lista de buffers |
229
+ | `/room` | Sala atual, como está enviando, e sua lista de buffers |
230
230
  | `/topic [texto\|clear]` | Mostra ou define o assunto da sala — aparece na barra de status e é sincronizado para quem entra depois |
231
231
  | `/owner` | Dono da sala |
232
232
  | `/kick` `/mute` `/ban` | Moderação (dono da sala) — presa à chave pública, então trocar de apelido não desfaz um ban |
@@ -252,10 +252,11 @@ sem verificar não leria uma palavra. Combine a senha por outro canal.
252
252
 
253
253
  | Comando | Descrição |
254
254
  | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
255
- | `/fingerprint [nick]` | Fingerprint + um **randomart** determinístico da chave |
256
- | `/verify <nick>` | Código SAS (~40 bits) + QR + randomart da chave para verificar |
255
+ | `/fingerprint [nick]` | Fingerprint, o fingerprint de identidade quando existe, e um **randomart** determinístico da chave |
256
+ | `/verify <nick>` | Código SAS (~40 bits) + QR + randomart da chave para verificar; diz se o código é sobre chaves de identidade ou de dispositivo |
257
257
  | `/verify-confirm <nick>` | Marca o peer como verificado |
258
258
  | `/backup [caminho]` | Backup cifrado da identidade + peers verificados (restaura no startup) |
259
+ | `/device [list\|request\|add\|accept\|remove]` | Seus dispositivos sob uma identidade. A chave de identidade nunca sai do dispositivo que a guarda: um segundo dispositivo recebe um lugar assinado na lista, não uma cópia da identidade. Remover um rotaciona a sala, então nada dito depois chega até ele |
259
260
  | `/trust <nick>` / `/trustlist` | Aceita chave nova / status de confiança |
260
261
  | `/contacts [add\|remove\|all]` | Agenda — apelidos persistentes nos registros de confiança ("esse fingerprint é o João"); aparece no `/users` e viaja no backup de identidade |
261
262
  | `/deniable [on\|off]` | Modo de negação plausível |
@@ -930,12 +930,18 @@ The all-members rule is what keeps the damage on that side of the line.
930
930
  |---|---|---|
931
931
  | `sk1` | client | I can **receive** a group message: I accept a sender key over the pairwise channel and can decrypt what that chain produces. |
932
932
  | `sk1` | relay | I can fan a room-addressed `group_message` out to a room's members. |
933
-
934
- Neither means "I send group messages" — nothing does yet. Receive and fan-out
935
- are deliberately a release ahead of send, because the switch is *every member
936
- agrees*: if the ability to read arrived with the ability to write, the switch
937
- would only ever be true in rooms where everybody upgraded at the same moment,
938
- which on a public hub is close to never. See `docs/design/sender-keys-on-relay.md`.
933
+ | `dl1` | client | I can read a signed device list handed to me over the pairwise channel. Client-only: a device list rides the sealed channel the relay already carries, so there is no relay half to negotiate. |
934
+
935
+ Neither means "I send group messages". Receive and fan-out shipped a release
936
+ ahead of send 2.11.0 and 2.12.0 because the switch is *every member agrees*:
937
+ if the ability to read had arrived with the ability to write, the switch would
938
+ only ever be true in rooms where everybody upgraded at the same moment, which on
939
+ a public hub is close to never.
940
+
941
+ The per-peer loop the switch falls back to is **not** going away; `/room` reports
942
+ which path a room is on and why. See `docs/design/sender-keys-on-relay.md` for
943
+ that decision, and `docs/design/multi-device.md` for the change that would
944
+ multiply the fallback's cost by the number of devices per peer.
939
945
 
940
946
  ## 7. Handshake Protocol
941
947
 
package/docs/PROTOCOL.md CHANGED
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ Every message carries three fields:
66
66
  and does not correct it; it exists for the recipient.
67
67
 
68
68
  Unknown fields are ignored. This is load-bearing: it is what lets an optional
69
- field like `pqPublicKey`, `caps` or `room` be added without a version bump, and
69
+ field like `pqPublicKey`, `caps`, `room` or `identityKey` be added without a
70
+ version bump, and
70
71
  what lets an older relay pass through a message it does not fully understand.
71
72
 
72
73
  ---
@@ -83,7 +84,9 @@ through a public hub needs. Capabilities carry that.
83
84
  3. The relay advertises **its own** abilities in `join_ack.serverCaps`. No client
84
85
  can promise these on the relay's behalf.
85
86
  4. A feature turns on only when **every member of the room** advertises it *and*
86
- the relay does.
87
+ the relay does — for features that need the relay to play along. A capability
88
+ whose feature rides a channel the relay already carries has no relay half and
89
+ is decided per peer; `dl1` is the first of those.
87
90
 
88
91
  Absent or empty means an older participant, which is a fallback, not an error.
89
92
 
@@ -97,12 +100,17 @@ a peer look capable of something it never claimed.
97
100
  |---|---|---|
98
101
  | `sk1` | client | I can *receive* a group message (§7) |
99
102
  | `sk1` | relay | I can fan a room-addressed message out |
103
+ | `dl1` | client | I can read a signed device list handed to me over the pairwise channel (§7) |
100
104
 
101
105
  Neither means "I send group messages". Receive and fan-out ship a release ahead
102
106
  of send, because the switch is *every member agrees*: if reading and writing
103
107
  arrived together, the switch would only ever be true in rooms where everybody
104
108
  upgraded at the same moment.
105
109
 
110
+ `dl1` has no relay half. A device list travels on the pairwise sealed channel
111
+ the relay already carries, so there is nothing for the relay to agree to and
112
+ nothing it can withhold beyond the frame itself.
113
+
106
114
  **What a hostile relay gains by editing these lists:** stripping a capability
107
115
  forces the room onto the older path, which is the status quo and reveals nothing
108
116
  new. Adding one a peer never claimed makes senders encrypt in a form that peer
@@ -116,7 +124,8 @@ plaintext. The all-members rule is what keeps the damage on that side.
116
124
  ```
117
125
  client relay other clients
118
126
  │ join(nickname, publicKey, │ │
119
- │ pqPublicKey?, caps?) │ │
127
+ │ pqPublicKey?, caps?, │ │
128
+ │ identityKey?) │ │
120
129
  ├──────────────────────────────▶│ │
121
130
  │ │ peer_joined(peer) │
122
131
  │ join_ack(sessionId, peers, ├─────────────────────────────────▶│
@@ -133,23 +142,47 @@ and must be recognised by key.
133
142
 
134
143
  | Field | Type | Required | Notes |
135
144
  |---|---|---|---|
136
- | `nickname` | string | yes | 1–20 chars, `^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$`, control characters stripped, case-insensitively unique among live sessions |
145
+ | `nickname` | string | yes | 1–20 chars, `^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$`, control characters stripped, case-insensitively unique among live sessions — **except for another device of the same identity**, see below |
137
146
  | `publicKey` | base64(32) | yes | Curve25519 identity key |
138
147
  | `pqPublicKey` | base64(1184) | no | ML-KEM-768 encapsulation key; absent = classical-only peer |
139
148
  | `caps` | string[] | no | §3; omitted when empty |
149
+ | `identityKey` | base64(32) | no | Ed25519 signing key for multi-device; absent = a client from before it existed |
150
+ | `deviceList` | object | no | The signed list from §7, sent to claim a nickname another of your own devices already holds |
140
151
 
141
152
  ### `join_ack` (relay → client)
142
153
 
143
154
  | Field | Type | Notes |
144
155
  |---|---|---|
145
156
  | `sessionId` | string | UUID for this connection |
146
- | `peers` | object[] | `{ sessionId, nickname, publicKey, pqPublicKey?, caps? }` |
157
+ | `peers` | object[] | `{ sessionId, nickname, publicKey, pqPublicKey?, caps?, identityKey? }` |
147
158
  | `room` | string | always `general` on join |
148
159
  | `queuedCount` | number | omitted when 0 |
149
160
  | `serverCaps` | string[] | omitted when empty |
150
161
  | `roomOwner` | string | nickname, when the room has one |
151
162
  | `motd` | string | operator notice, when configured |
152
163
 
164
+ **`identityKey` is relayed verbatim and the relay cannot verify it.** It forwards
165
+ whatever the JOIN carried, so a hostile relay can substitute one: presence in a
166
+ `join_ack` is not evidence of anything. What makes an identity key trustworthy is
167
+ a device list signed by it and checked by the client — never the relay repeating
168
+ it. It is also not what a ban keys on; that stays the Curve25519 `publicKey`.
169
+
170
+ **One nickname may be held by several devices of one identity.** A second
171
+ session is admitted under a name already in use only if its JOIN carries a
172
+ `deviceList` that
173
+
174
+ 1. is signed by the identity the existing sessions under that name are using,
175
+ 2. names *this* JOIN's own `publicKey`, and
176
+ 3. would not take the name past the eight-device limit.
177
+
178
+ No challenge is issued and none is needed. Replaying a list somebody else
179
+ published buys a seat in a room under a name whose messages you cannot read,
180
+ because you do not hold the box secret the list names — and peers do their own
181
+ checking, so they learn nothing from the relay having allowed it. The relay is
182
+ doing admission control on a nickname here, not attesting to an identity.
183
+
184
+ The name is released when the **last** of its sessions leaves, not the first.
185
+
153
186
  ### `peer_joined` / `peer_left` (relay → clients)
154
187
 
155
188
  `peer_joined` carries the same peer object as `join_ack.peers`. Both carry an
@@ -179,6 +212,36 @@ route, never to attest.
179
212
  as `peer_key_updated` to every session sharing a room. The previous key is kept
180
213
  briefly on both sides so messages in flight still open.
181
214
 
215
+ **What a SAS compares is moving.** Historically the code is BLAKE2b over the two
216
+ Curve25519 keys — the device keys — which means it is invalidated by a key
217
+ rotation and says nothing about a person with more than one device. Once both
218
+ sides advertise `dl1` **and** each holds the other's device list, the code is
219
+ computed over the two Ed25519 identity keys instead, under a separate domain
220
+ tag. The switch is symmetric: both sides reach that state together, so a pair
221
+ never sees two different codes. Against a peer without `dl1` both sides compute
222
+ the device code, exactly as before. `/verify` names which of the two it is
223
+ showing.
224
+
225
+ **Existing verifications are carried across, never re-asked.** A record verified
226
+ against a device key gains its identity when a signed device list arrives that
227
+ **names that same device key**, over the pairwise channel only the holder of
228
+ that key could have written to. The identity is then vouched for by precisely
229
+ what the user compared digits over. A list that does not name the key it arrived
230
+ under binds nothing — it is not an attack, a rotation can race a distribution,
231
+ but it proves nothing. A *second, different* identity for a record that already
232
+ has one is never accepted silently; on a verified record it is reported in the
233
+ same voice as a verified-key mismatch, and nothing is changed.
234
+
235
+ **Another device is not a key that changed.** A peer's second device arrives
236
+ under the same nickname with a box key the record has never seen — which is
237
+ exactly the shape of a man-in-the-middle, and is reported as one. The alarm is
238
+ never suppressed in advance: claiming the right `identityKey` in a JOIN proves
239
+ nothing, since the relay forwards that field unchecked. It is *answered*, once a
240
+ device list signed by the identity bound to that record names the key. From then
241
+ on the key is recognised silently, and the record keeps the verified key as its
242
+ primary — a device is added beside it, never over it. A list may only add
243
+ devices to the record its own identity is bound to.
244
+
182
245
  **Hybrid post-quantum.** When both sides advertised `pqPublicKey`, the ratchet
183
246
  root is mixed once at initialisation:
184
247
 
@@ -398,6 +461,98 @@ Room membership is not a formality: without it one connection could inject into
398
461
  every room on the hub at once, which the unicast path cannot do because it needs
399
462
  a `sessionId` it could only have been told.
400
463
 
464
+ ### Device lists
465
+
466
+ A second thing travels the pairwise channel, gated on `dl1` and read by nothing
467
+ yet: a **device list**, the set of box keys that belong to one identity, signed
468
+ by the Ed25519 `identityKey` from §4. Multi-device is designed in
469
+ `docs/design/multi-device.md`; this is the plumbing landing ahead of it. Today
470
+ every list names exactly one device, because nothing can add a second.
471
+
472
+ ```json
473
+ { "action": "device_list",
474
+ "list": {
475
+ "identityPk": "b64(32)",
476
+ "counter": 1,
477
+ "devices": [ { "deviceId": "hex(32)", "boxPk": "b64(32)",
478
+ "label": "", "createdAt": 1739800000000 } ],
479
+ "signature": "b64(64)"
480
+ },
481
+ "sentAt": 1739800000000 }
482
+ ```
483
+
484
+ The signature covers a domain tag, the identity key, the counter, **the number
485
+ of devices**, and every field of each one, each length-prefixed by its byte
486
+ count. There is no ML-KEM key in a descriptor: a list is a set of claims about
487
+ identity, a KEM key is transport material already advertised per session in
488
+ JOIN, and carrying it cost 1584 bytes of base64 per device. The count is in there so a device cannot be dropped off the end
489
+ unnoticed; byte prefixes are there so a multi-byte label cannot shift a field
490
+ boundary.
491
+
492
+ **`counter` only ever goes up, and the reader enforces it.** A list at the same
493
+ counter is not newer and is refused, so an edit cannot slip in sideways; a lower
494
+ one is a replay. Without this a relay that kept an old copy could play it back,
495
+ and once revocation exists that is how a removed device would be put back. The
496
+ sender's counter is persisted and moves whenever its descriptor does — a
497
+ box-key rotation changes `boxPk`, so it changes the list.
498
+
499
+ **What authenticates a list is the channel, not the seal.** `crypto_box_seal` is
500
+ anonymous: anyone can seal a blob to you claiming any sender. The payload
501
+ underneath is `crypto_box` to your key from the peer's, so it only opens if the
502
+ sender holds that peer's box secret. That is what makes the list theirs. The
503
+ `identityKey` the relay repeated in `join_ack` is a *hint* — it decides whether
504
+ handing a list over is worth the round trip, and nothing more. A relay that
505
+ tampers with it can stop the exchange happening; it cannot put words in a peer's
506
+ mouth, because it cannot produce the payload.
507
+
508
+ **Answered, not announced**, for the same reason as *Distribution* above: a
509
+ newcomer learns the room before the room learns of the newcomer, so a client
510
+ that announced itself on arrival would be talking to peers holding no key for
511
+ it. Peers who already know you speak first; you answer, and you mark them as
512
+ holding your list **before** sending, because on a synchronous transport their
513
+ answer can arrive before the send call returns.
514
+
515
+ **Revocation is a shorter list with a higher counter**, and the list is only
516
+ half of it. A removed device still holds every member's sender chain, and a
517
+ chain ratchets forward — dropping it from the list stops the relay delivering to
518
+ it and does not stop it reading. So every reader that sees devices disappear
519
+ from a list **rotates its own chain for the room**, exactly as it does when a
520
+ member leaves.
521
+
522
+ On the receiving side a list is a *replacement*, not an addition: the keys it
523
+ names are the keys that are that person, and one that is no longer named stops
524
+ being honoured — including the key the trust record was originally built on. A
525
+ revoked primary that stayed trusted would make revocation decorative.
526
+
527
+ Two limits, stated rather than discovered. A revoked device that is already
528
+ connected keeps its session until it disconnects; it is refused on its next
529
+ JOIN, because the list no longer names its key. And it keeps whatever it
530
+ received before the rotation, which is what forward secrecy means and not a
531
+ defect.
532
+
533
+ **Provisioning happens off the wire.** A second device is added by the user
534
+ carrying two short strings between the two machines, not by anything the relay
535
+ sees:
536
+
537
+ ```
538
+ ciphermesh-device://request/<base64url> { deviceId, boxPk, label }
539
+ ciphermesh-device://grant/<base64url> { identityPk, list }
540
+ ```
541
+
542
+ The identity secret never moves. A secondary holds only the public half and the
543
+ list it was granted, so it can prove which identity it belongs to and can
544
+ publish that list, but it cannot sign a new one — adding and revoking stay with
545
+ the device that holds the secret. Neither string is confidential; a grant is
546
+ caught if substituted, because it only applies when the list names the exact
547
+ device that asked, by both id and key.
548
+
549
+ A secondary therefore does not rotate its box key: it could not re-sign the list
550
+ that names it, and the result would be a device nothing vouches for.
551
+
552
+ **The label is empty**, and stays empty until there is a second device to tell
553
+ apart. A hostname is the obvious filler and exactly the kind of thing that does
554
+ not go on this wire.
555
+
401
556
  ---
402
557
 
403
558
  ## 8. Offline delivery
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "$comment": "Generated by scripts/generate-commands.mjs — do not edit. Which commands exist comes from the case labels in the two controllers; prose comes from README.md and the Ctrl+K palette.",
3
3
  "counts": {
4
- "total": 67,
5
- "relay": 67,
4
+ "total": 68,
5
+ "relay": 68,
6
6
  "p2p": 64
7
7
  },
8
8
  "groups": [
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@
196
196
  {
197
197
  "name": "/room",
198
198
  "args": "",
199
- "summary": "Current room + your buffer list",
199
+ "summary": "Current room, how it is sending it, and your buffer list",
200
200
  "modes": [
201
201
  "relay",
202
202
  "p2p"
@@ -289,6 +289,14 @@
289
289
  "p2p"
290
290
  ]
291
291
  },
292
+ {
293
+ "name": "/device",
294
+ "args": "[list\\|request\\|add\\|accept\\|remove]",
295
+ "summary": "Your devices under one identity. The identity key never leaves the device that holds it, so a second device is granted a signed place on the list rather than a copy of your identity. Removing one rotates the room, so nothing said afterwards reaches it",
296
+ "modes": [
297
+ "relay"
298
+ ]
299
+ },
292
300
  {
293
301
  "name": "/ephemeral",
294
302
  "args": "<30s\\|5m\\|1h\\|off>",
@@ -301,7 +309,7 @@
301
309
  {
302
310
  "name": "/fingerprint",
303
311
  "args": "[nick]",
304
- "summary": "Key fingerprint + a deterministic **randomart** picture of the key",
312
+ "summary": "Key fingerprint, the identity fingerprint when there is one, and a deterministic **randomart** picture of the key",
305
313
  "modes": [
306
314
  "relay",
307
315
  "p2p"
@@ -364,7 +372,7 @@
364
372
  {
365
373
  "name": "/verify",
366
374
  "args": "<nick>",
367
- "summary": "SAS code (~40-bit) + QR + key randomart for out-of-band verification",
375
+ "summary": "SAS code (~40-bit) + QR + key randomart for out-of-band verification; says whether the code is over identity keys or device keys",
368
376
  "modes": [
369
377
  "relay",
370
378
  "p2p"