cc-reviewer 5.0.0 → 5.1.1

package/dist/adapters/claude.js

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ export class ClaudeAdapter {
         const args = [
             '-p', // Non-interactive, print and exit
             '--model', 'opus', // Use Opus
-            '--bare', // Skip hooks, plugins, CLAUDE.md, auto-memory
+            '--setting-sources', '', // Skip hooks, plugins, CLAUDE.md (preserves OAuth auth; --bare kills keychain)
             '--permission-mode', 'plan', // Read-only enforcement (layer 1)
             '--verbose', // Required for stream-json
             '--output-format', 'stream-json', // Structured streaming events
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ export class ClaudeAdapter {
         if (lower.includes('rate limit') || lower.includes('rate_limit') || lower.includes('quota')) {
             return { type: 'rate_limit', message: `Claude rate limit: ${stderr.slice(0, 500)}` };
         }
-        if (lower.includes('unauthorized') || lower.includes('authentication') || lower.includes('api key') || stderr.includes('401') || stderr.includes('403')) {
+        if (lower.includes('unauthorized') || lower.includes('authentication') || lower.includes('not logged in') || lower.includes('api key') || stderr.includes('401') || stderr.includes('403')) {
             return { type: 'auth_error', message: `Authentication failed: ${stderr.slice(0, 500)}`, details: { stderr } };
         }
         return { type: 'cli_error', message: stderr.slice(0, 500) || 'Unknown error' };

package/dist/handoff.d.ts

@@ -209,7 +209,10 @@ export declare const ARCHITECTURE_REVIEWER: ReviewerRole;
 export declare const CORRECTNESS_REVIEWER: ReviewerRole;
 export declare const ROLES: Record<string, ReviewerRole>;
 /**
- * Select the best role based on focus areas
+ * Select and compose roles based on focus areas.
+ *
+ * When multiple focus areas map to different roles (e.g. security + performance),
+ * composes them into a single role with merged prompts instead of picking one winner.
  */
 export declare function selectRole(focusAreas?: FocusArea[]): ReviewerRole;
 export declare const ADVERSARIAL_REVIEWER: ReviewerRole;
@@ -229,7 +232,30 @@ export interface PromptOptions {
  */
 export declare function buildHandoffPrompt(options: PromptOptions): string;
 /**
- * Build a handoff from legacy simple inputs
+ * Parse structured ccOutput into Handoff fields.
+ *
+ * The slash commands tell CC to format its output as:
+ *   SUMMARY:
+ *   <text>
+ *
+ *   UNCERTAINTIES (verify these):
+ *   1. <text>
+ *
+ *   QUESTIONS:
+ *   1. <text>
+ *
+ *   PRIORITY FILES:
+ *   - <file>
+ *
+ * If no sections detected, returns { summary: ccOutput } (graceful fallback).
+ */
+export declare function parseStructuredCcOutput(ccOutput: string): Pick<Handoff, 'summary'> & Partial<Handoff>;
+/**
+ * Build a handoff from MCP tool inputs.
+ *
+ * Parses structured sections (SUMMARY, UNCERTAINTIES, QUESTIONS, PRIORITY FILES)
+ * from ccOutput when present, populating typed Handoff fields so reviewers
+ * receive machine-usable context instead of a single summary blob.
  */
 export declare function buildSimpleHandoff(workingDir: string, ccOutput: string, analyzedFiles?: string[], focusAreas?: string[], customPrompt?: string): Handoff;
 /**

package/dist/handoff.js

@@ -127,7 +127,8 @@ export const CORRECTNESS_REVIEWER = {
     isGeneric: false,
     applicableFocusAreas: ['correctness', 'testing'],
     systemPrompt: `Correctness analyst. Focus on logic errors, edge cases, race conditions, error handling.
-Provide triggering inputs and expected vs actual behavior.`,
+Provide triggering inputs and expected vs actual behavior.
+For significant bugs, suggest a concrete regression test (name, inputs, expected output).`,
 };
 // All roles indexed by ID
 export const ROLES = {
@@ -139,20 +140,38 @@ export const ROLES = {
     correctness: CORRECTNESS_REVIEWER,
 };
 /**
- * Select the best role based on focus areas
+ * Select and compose roles based on focus areas.
+ *
+ * When multiple focus areas map to different roles (e.g. security + performance),
+ * composes them into a single role with merged prompts instead of picking one winner.
  */
 export function selectRole(focusAreas) {
     if (!focusAreas || focusAreas.length === 0) {
         return COMPREHENSIVE_REVIEWER;
     }
+    // Collect all unique matching roles (preserving insertion order)
+    const matched = new Map();
     for (const focus of focusAreas) {
         for (const role of Object.values(ROLES)) {
             if (!role.isGeneric && role.applicableFocusAreas.includes(focus)) {
-                return role;
+                matched.set(role.id, role);
             }
         }
     }
-    return CHANGE_FOCUSED_REVIEWER;
+    if (matched.size === 0)
+        return CHANGE_FOCUSED_REVIEWER;
+    if (matched.size === 1)
+        return [...matched.values()][0];
+    // Compose multiple roles into one
+    const roles = [...matched.values()];
+    return {
+        id: roles.map(r => r.id).join('+'),
+        name: roles.map(r => r.name).join(' + '),
+        description: roles.map(r => r.description).join('; '),
+        isGeneric: false,
+        applicableFocusAreas: focusAreas,
+        systemPrompt: roles.map(r => `**As ${r.name}:** ${r.systemPrompt}`).join('\n'),
+    };
 }
 // =============================================================================
 // ADVERSARIAL REVIEWER — Challenge mode for multi_review
@@ -251,9 +270,7 @@ ${handoff.questions.map((q, i) => `${i + 1}. **${q.question}**
     if (handoff.decisions && handoff.decisions.length > 0) {
         sections.push(`## DECISIONS TO EVALUATE
 
-${handoff.decisions.map((d, i) => `${i + 1}. **${d.decision}**
-   Rationale: ${d.rationale}
-   ${d.alternatives ? `Alternatives: ${d.alternatives.join(', ')}` : ''}`).join('\n')}`);
+${handoff.decisions.map((d, i) => `${i + 1}. **${d.decision}**${d.rationale ? `\n   Rationale: ${d.rationale}` : ''}${d.alternatives ? `\n   Alternatives: ${d.alternatives.join(', ')}` : ''}`).join('\n')}`);
     }
     // SECTION 7: FOCUS AREAS
     if (handoff.focusAreas && handoff.focusAreas.length > 0) {
@@ -269,6 +286,63 @@ ${handoff.decisions.map((d, i) => `${i + 1}. **${d.decision}**
     }
     return sections.join('\n\n');
 }
+// =============================================================================
+// FOCUS-AREA CHECKLISTS — Specific patterns to look for (ported from prompt-v2)
+// =============================================================================
+const FOCUS_CHECKLISTS = {
+    security: `Check for:
+- Injection vulnerabilities (SQL, NoSQL, Command, XSS)
+- Auth/authorization bypass, session management flaws
+- Sensitive data exposure, insecure storage, missing encryption
+- Input validation gaps (type, range, format)
+- Path traversal, SSRF, unsafe deserialization
+For each: CWE ID if applicable, attack scenario, severity by impact + exploitability.`,
+    performance: `Check for:
+- Algorithmic complexity (provide Big-O notation)
+- N+1 queries, missing indexes, unoptimized queries
+- Blocking I/O in async contexts
+- Memory leaks, unbounded allocations, large object retention
+- Missing caching/memoization, repeated expensive operations
+For each: Big-O analysis, estimated impact, concrete optimization.`,
+    architecture: `Check for:
+- SOLID violations (SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP)
+- High coupling between modules, low cohesion within
+- Layering violations, circular dependencies
+- Anti-patterns (god classes, deep nesting, magic numbers, leaky abstractions)
+- Missing or misused design patterns
+For each: specific principle violated, refactoring suggestion, maintainability impact.`,
+    correctness: `Check for:
+- Off-by-one errors, incorrect conditionals, wrong operators
+- Null/undefined handling, empty collections, boundary conditions
+- Race conditions, deadlock potential, state inconsistency
+- Uncaught exceptions, silent failures, incorrect error propagation
+For each: triggering input, expected vs actual behavior.
+For significant bugs: suggest a concrete regression test.`,
+    testing: `Check for:
+- Missing test coverage for changed code paths
+- Tests that pass for wrong reasons (tautologies, mocked-away logic)
+- Non-deterministic tests (timing, ordering, randomness)
+- Missing edge case tests (null, empty, boundary, error paths)
+For significant gaps: suggest a concrete test (name, inputs, expected output).`,
+    scalability: `Check for:
+- Algorithmic complexity that degrades at scale (provide Big-O)
+- Unbounded growth (queues, caches, in-memory collections)
+- Missing pagination, rate limiting, or backpressure
+- Single points of contention (locks, shared state, single-threaded bottlenecks)
+For each: estimated impact at 10x/100x current load.`,
+    maintainability: `Check for:
+- God classes, deep nesting (>3 levels), magic numbers
+- Tight coupling between modules, leaky abstractions
+- Code duplication that should be extracted
+- Missing or misleading comments on non-obvious logic
+For each: specific refactoring suggestion with rationale.`,
+    documentation: `Check for:
+- Public API functions missing doc comments
+- Outdated or misleading comments that contradict the code
+- Missing README updates for changed behavior
+- Undocumented configuration, environment variables, or flags
+For each: what specifically should be documented and where.`,
+};
 /**
  * Build the review prompt using minimal, targeted context.
  * No output format constraints — reviewer responds naturally, CC interprets.
@@ -279,7 +353,17 @@ export function buildHandoffPrompt(options) {
     const sections = [];
     // SECTION 1: ROLE
     sections.push(`# ROLE: ${role.name}\n\n${role.systemPrompt}`);
-    // SECTION 2: TASK
+    // SECTION 2: REVIEW CHECKLIST (focus-area-specific patterns to look for)
+    const focusAreas = handoff.focusAreas;
+    if (focusAreas && focusAreas.length > 0) {
+        const checklists = focusAreas
+            .map(f => FOCUS_CHECKLISTS[f])
+            .filter((c) => !!c);
+        if (checklists.length > 0) {
+            sections.push(`## REVIEW CHECKLIST\n\n${checklists.join('\n\n')}`);
+        }
+    }
+    // SECTION 3: TASK
     sections.push(`## YOUR TASK
 
 Review code in \`${handoff.workingDir}\`.
@@ -289,7 +373,7 @@ Review code in \`${handoff.workingDir}\`.
 **IMPORTANT:**
 - This is a READ-ONLY review. Do NOT create, modify, or delete any files. Only read files to verify claims.
 - Do NOT assume a git repository exists. Do NOT run git commands. Read files directly from the filesystem.`);
-    // SECTION 3: CC'S UNCERTAINTIES
+    // SECTION 4: CC'S UNCERTAINTIES
     if (handoff.uncertainties && handoff.uncertainties.length > 0) {
         sections.push(`## CC'S UNCERTAINTIES
 
@@ -298,7 +382,7 @@ ${handoff.uncertainties.map((u, i) => `### ${i + 1}. ${u.topic} ${u.severity ===
 ${u.ccAssumption ? `- **CC assumed:** ${u.ccAssumption}` : ''}
 ${u.relevantFiles ? `- **Files:** ${u.relevantFiles.join(', ')}` : ''}`).join('\n\n')}`);
     }
-    // SECTION 4: SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
+    // SECTION 5: SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
     if (handoff.questions && handoff.questions.length > 0) {
         sections.push(`## QUESTIONS FROM CC
 
@@ -306,39 +390,184 @@ ${handoff.questions.map((q, i) => `${i + 1}. **${q.question}**
    ${q.context ? `Context: ${q.context}` : ''}
    ${q.ccGuess ? `CC Guess: ${q.ccGuess}` : ''}`).join('\n')}`);
     }
-    // SECTION 5: DECISIONS TO EVALUATE
+    // SECTION 6: DECISIONS TO EVALUATE
     if (handoff.decisions && handoff.decisions.length > 0) {
         sections.push(`## DECISIONS TO EVALUATE
 
-${handoff.decisions.map((d, i) => `${i + 1}. **${d.decision}**
-   Rationale: ${d.rationale}
-   ${d.alternatives ? `Alternatives: ${d.alternatives.join(', ')}` : ''}`).join('\n')}`);
+${handoff.decisions.map((d, i) => `${i + 1}. **${d.decision}**${d.rationale ? `\n   Rationale: ${d.rationale}` : ''}${d.alternatives ? `\n   Alternatives: ${d.alternatives.join(', ')}` : ''}`).join('\n')}`);
     }
-    // SECTION 6: PRIORITY FILES
+    // SECTION 7: PRIORITY FILES
     if (handoff.priorityFiles && handoff.priorityFiles.length > 0) {
         sections.push(`## PRIORITY FILES\n\n${handoff.priorityFiles.map(f => `- \`${f}\``).join('\n')}`);
     }
-    // SECTION 7: CUSTOM INSTRUCTIONS
+    // SECTION 8: CUSTOM INSTRUCTIONS
     if (handoff.customInstructions) {
         sections.push(`## ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS\n\n${handoff.customInstructions}`);
     }
     return sections.join('\n\n');
 }
 // =============================================================================
-// HELPER: Build handoff from simple inputs (backwards compatibility)
+// STRUCTURED ccOutput PARSER
 // =============================================================================
 /**
- * Build a handoff from legacy simple inputs
+ * Parse structured ccOutput into Handoff fields.
+ *
+ * The slash commands tell CC to format its output as:
+ *   SUMMARY:
+ *   <text>
+ *
+ *   UNCERTAINTIES (verify these):
+ *   1. <text>
+ *
+ *   QUESTIONS:
+ *   1. <text>
+ *
+ *   PRIORITY FILES:
+ *   - <file>
+ *
+ * If no sections detected, returns { summary: ccOutput } (graceful fallback).
+ */
+export function parseStructuredCcOutput(ccOutput) {
+    // Quick check: does it look structured? Case-SENSITIVE to avoid matching
+    // prose like "Summary: I think..." — slash commands produce ALL-CAPS headers.
+    if (!/^SUMMARY[^:\n]*:/m.test(ccOutput)) {
+        return { summary: ccOutput };
+    }
+    // Known section headers — case-SENSITIVE (ALL-CAPS only) to prevent
+    // header injection from natural prose starting with "Questions:" etc.
+    const KNOWN_HEADERS = ['SUMMARY', 'UNCERTAINTIES', 'QUESTIONS', 'PRIORITY FILES', 'DECISIONS'];
+    const headerPattern = new RegExp(`^(${KNOWN_HEADERS.join('|')})[^:\\n]*:`, 'gm' // no 'i' flag — case-sensitive
+    );
+    // Find all header positions
+    const headers = [];
+    let match;
+    while ((match = headerPattern.exec(ccOutput)) !== null) {
+        const raw = match[1].trim();
+        const name = KNOWN_HEADERS.find(h => raw.startsWith(h)) || raw;
+        headers.push({ name, contentStart: match.index + match[0].length });
+    }
+    if (headers.length === 0) {
+        return { summary: ccOutput };
+    }
+    // Extract content between headers
+    const sections = new Map();
+    for (let i = 0; i < headers.length; i++) {
+        const start = headers[i].contentStart;
+        const end = i + 1 < headers.length
+            ? ccOutput.lastIndexOf('\n', headers[i + 1].contentStart - headers[i + 1].name.length - 1)
+            : ccOutput.length;
+        sections.set(headers[i].name, ccOutput.slice(start, end).trim());
+    }
+    const rawSummary = sections.get('SUMMARY');
+    const result = {
+        summary: rawSummary && rawSummary.length > 0 ? rawSummary : ccOutput,
+    };
+    // Parse uncertainties (numbered or bulleted list)
+    const uncertText = sections.get('UNCERTAINTIES');
+    if (uncertText) {
+        const items = parseListItems(uncertText);
+        if (items.length > 0) {
+            result.uncertainties = items.map(item => ({
+                topic: extractTopic(item),
+                question: item,
+            }));
+        }
+    }
+    // Parse questions (numbered or bulleted list)
+    const questionsText = sections.get('QUESTIONS');
+    if (questionsText) {
+        const items = parseListItems(questionsText);
+        if (items.length > 0) {
+            result.questions = items.map(item => ({ question: item }));
+        }
+    }
+    // Parse priority files (bullet or numbered list)
+    const filesText = sections.get('PRIORITY FILES');
+    if (filesText) {
+        const items = parseListItems(filesText);
+        if (items.length > 0) {
+            result.priorityFiles = items;
+        }
+    }
+    // Parse decisions (numbered or bulleted list)
+    const decisionsText = sections.get('DECISIONS');
+    if (decisionsText) {
+        const items = parseListItems(decisionsText);
+        if (items.length > 0) {
+            result.decisions = items.map(item => ({ decision: item, rationale: '' }));
+        }
+    }
+    return result;
+}
+/**
+ * Extract a short topic from an item — uses first sentence/clause up to 60 chars.
+ * Avoids redundant rendering where topic === question.
+ */
+function extractTopic(item) {
+    // Try first clause (up to first comma, period, dash, or question mark)
+    const clauseMatch = item.match(/^(.+?)[,.\-?]/);
+    const clause = clauseMatch ? clauseMatch[1].trim() : item;
+    if (clause.length <= 60)
+        return clause;
+    return clause.slice(0, 57) + '...';
+}
+/**
+ * Parse a list section that may use numbered ("1. foo") or bulleted ("- foo") format.
+ * Supports multi-line continuation for both styles.
+ */
+function parseListItems(text) {
+    const items = [];
+    let current = '';
+    for (const line of text.split('\n')) {
+        // Match numbered: "1. foo", "2) bar"
+        const numbered = line.match(/^\d+[.)]\s+(.+)/);
+        // Match bulleted: "- foo", "* bar"
+        const bulleted = line.match(/^[-*]\s+(.+)/);
+        if (numbered || bulleted) {
+            if (current)
+                items.push(current.trim());
+            current = (numbered || bulleted)[1];
+        }
+        else if (current && line.trim()) {
+            // Continuation line for multi-line items
+            current += ' ' + line.trim();
+        }
+    }
+    if (current)
+        items.push(current.trim());
+    return items;
+}
+// =============================================================================
+// HELPER: Build handoff from simple inputs
+// =============================================================================
+/**
+ * Build a handoff from MCP tool inputs.
+ *
+ * Parses structured sections (SUMMARY, UNCERTAINTIES, QUESTIONS, PRIORITY FILES)
+ * from ccOutput when present, populating typed Handoff fields so reviewers
+ * receive machine-usable context instead of a single summary blob.
  */
 export function buildSimpleHandoff(workingDir, ccOutput, analyzedFiles, focusAreas, customPrompt) {
+    const parsed = parseStructuredCcOutput(ccOutput);
+    // Merge analyzedFiles with any priority files parsed from ccOutput (dedup)
+    const mergedFiles = dedupStrings([
+        ...(parsed.priorityFiles || []),
+        ...(analyzedFiles || []),
+    ]);
     return {
         workingDir,
-        summary: ccOutput,
-        priorityFiles: analyzedFiles,
+        summary: parsed.summary,
+        uncertainties: parsed.uncertainties,
+        questions: parsed.questions,
+        decisions: parsed.decisions,
+        priorityFiles: mergedFiles.length > 0 ? mergedFiles : undefined,
         focusAreas,
         customInstructions: customPrompt,
     };
 }
+function dedupStrings(arr) {
+    return [...new Set(arr)];
+}
 /**
  * Enhance a simple handoff with uncertainties/questions
  * CC should call this to add its specific concerns

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "cc-reviewer",
-  "version": "5.0.0",
+  "version": "5.1.1",
   "description": "MCP server for Claude Code - Get second-opinion feedback from Codex/Gemini CLIs",
   "type": "module",
   "main": "dist/index.js",