cc-devflow 4.5.6 → 4.5.7

package/docs/examples/full-design-blocked/changes/REQ-002-bulk-invite-import/planning/task-manifest.json

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
   "requirementId": "REQ-002",
   "requirementVersion": "REQ-002.v2",
   "planningMeta": {
-    "reqPlanSkillVersion": "3.7.7",
+    "reqPlanSkillVersion": "3.8.1",
     "designVersion": "design.v2",
     "approvedAt": null,
     "approvedBy": null,
@@ -14,21 +14,28 @@
     "requirementBrief": {
       "problemStatement": "Admins onboarding larger teams need predictable bulk invite behavior for duplicates, invalid rows, and seat limits.",
       "solutionSummary": "Freeze deterministic CSV row outcomes before executing the bulk invite flow.",
-      "actors": ["workspace admin", "support operator"],
+      "actors": [
+        "workspace admin",
+        "support operator"
+      ],
       "userStories": [
         {
           "id": "US-001",
           "actor": "workspace admin",
           "want": "upload a CSV of invite emails",
           "benefit": "invite many collaborators without one-by-one entry",
-          "acceptance": ["Mixed valid rows produce visible accepted outcomes"]
+          "acceptance": [
+            "Mixed valid rows produce visible accepted outcomes"
+          ]
         },
         {
           "id": "US-002",
           "actor": "workspace admin",
           "want": "see duplicate, invalid, and over-limit row states",
           "benefit": "understand what happened without support help",
-          "acceptance": ["Every skipped or rejected row has a reason"]
+          "acceptance": [
+            "Every skipped or rejected row has a reason"
+          ]
         }
       ],
       "edgeOrRecoveryStories": [
@@ -37,19 +44,51 @@
           "actor": "workspace admin",
           "boundary": "CSV contains duplicates, invalid emails, or over-limit rows",
           "desiredOutcome": "safe rows can proceed while bad rows are explained",
-          "acceptance": ["Rule matrix covers duplicate, invalid, and seat-limit cases"]
+          "acceptance": [
+            "Rule matrix covers duplicate, invalid, and seat-limit cases"
+          ]
         }
       ],
-      "implementationDecisions": ["Freeze one row-outcome matrix before execution resumes"],
-      "testingDecisions": ["Test row semantics through bulk-import rules and the admin upload flow"],
-      "outOfScope": ["enterprise SCIM provisioning", "background job redesign", "rollback wizard for partial success"],
-      "furtherNotes": ["Design remains blocked until duplicate and seat-limit semantics are approved"]
+      "implementationDecisions": [
+        "Freeze one row-outcome matrix before execution resumes"
+      ],
+      "testingDecisions": [
+        "Test row semantics through bulk-import rules and the admin upload flow"
+      ],
+      "outOfScope": [
+        "enterprise SCIM provisioning",
+        "background job redesign",
+        "rollback wizard for partial success"
+      ],
+      "furtherNotes": [
+        "Design remains blocked until duplicate and seat-limit semantics are approved"
+      ]
+    },
+    "externalBestPractice": {
+      "needed": true,
+      "decisionStatus": "declined",
+      "decisionQuestionId": "D2",
+      "privacyGuard": "generalized terms only; no project names, private requirements, customer names, secrets, logs, or proprietary concepts",
+      "generalizedSearchTerms": [
+        "bulk invite CSV import validation best practices"
+      ],
+      "sourcesChecked": [],
+      "conventionalWisdom": "",
+      "currentDiscourse": "",
+      "repoFitVerdict": "skipped",
+      "designImpacts": [
+        "keep the design blocked until row-outcome semantics are approved from internal evidence"
+      ],
+      "skippedReason": "user kept the example repo-local for the blocked design"
     },
     "decisionQuestions": [
       {
         "questionId": "D1",
         "gate": "approach-approval",
-        "knownEvidence": ["Best-effort upload would hide duplicate, invalid, and seat-limit semantics", "Audit mapping depends on deterministic row outcomes"],
+        "knownEvidence": [
+          "Best-effort upload would hide duplicate, invalid, and seat-limit semantics",
+          "Audit mapping depends on deterministic row outcomes"
+        ],
         "recommendation": "Choose Option B and freeze a rule matrix first",
         "options": [
           {
@@ -75,9 +114,42 @@
       },
       {
         "questionId": "D2",
-        "gate": "ambiguity-blocker",
-        "knownEvidence": ["Duplicate and seat-limit outcomes are still not explicit enough for tests", "Audit entries must match visible row outcomes"],
-        "recommendation": "Answer the row-outcome matrix before task generation",
+        "gate": "external-best-practice",
+        "knownEvidence": [
+          "Bulk CSV import semantics could benefit from generalized external practice",
+          "The example keeps private details out of any external lookup"
+        ],
+        "recommendation": "Stay repo-local for this blocked example",
+        "options": [
+          {
+            "id": "A",
+            "label": "Search generalized best practices",
+            "recommended": false,
+            "completeness": "9/10",
+            "good": "Could improve row-outcome terminology before task generation",
+            "costRisk": "Sends generalized category terms outside the local repo"
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "B",
+            "label": "Stay repo-local",
+            "recommended": true,
+            "completeness": "7/10",
+            "good": "Keeps the blocked example private and focused on internal semantics",
+            "costRisk": "Does not compare against external CSV-import conventions"
+          }
+        ],
+        "userChoice": "B",
+        "impact": "cc-do still must not start implementation until row outcomes are answered from internal evidence",
+        "status": "answered"
+      },
+      {
+        "questionId": "D3",
+        "gate": "review-blocker",
+        "knownEvidence": [
+          "Duplicate and seat-limit outcomes are still not explicit enough for final requirement proof",
+          "Audit entries must match visible row outcomes"
+        ],
+        "recommendation": "Answer the row-outcome matrix before retry or cc-act",
         "options": [
           {
             "id": "A",
@@ -97,10 +169,31 @@
           }
         ],
         "userChoice": null,
-        "impact": "No executable task manifest should be approved until this is answered",
+        "impact": "cc-do retry and cc-act must stay blocked until this is answered",
         "status": "asked"
       }
-    ]
+    ],
+    "aiLeverageDecisionLens": {
+      "realUserOrOperator": "workspace admin onboarding larger teams",
+      "statusQuoWorkaround": "paste invite emails one by one or track them in spreadsheets",
+      "humanTeamEffortForFullScope": "multiple weeks across product, engineering, billing, and support review",
+      "ccAgentEffortForFullScope": "several hours once row semantics are approved, but unbounded before that",
+      "aiCompressionRatio": "high after semantics freeze, low while the product contract is ambiguous",
+      "completeLakeBoundary": "row classification, admin upload flow, billing-seat checks, and audit mapping after rule approval",
+      "oceanBoundary": "SCIM, background retries, rollback wizard, and unspecified billing semantics",
+      "scopeRecommendation": "sharp-wedge",
+      "costModel": {
+        "agentTime": "medium after rule approval",
+        "humanReviewTime": "high until semantics are approved",
+        "verificationCost": "bulk rules, admin flow, billing, and audit tests",
+        "maintenanceCost": "medium after semantics freeze",
+        "failureCost": "high if billing or audit outcomes drift",
+        "reversibility": "limited once execution semantics ship"
+      },
+      "verdict": "sharp-wedge",
+      "missingEvidenceOrPivotReason": "none at plan approval; cc-check later reopened duplicate, invalid-row, partial-success, and seat-limit semantics before retry or cc-act",
+      "impactOnApprovedDirection": "allow bounded import-path execution, then block final proof if review finds row semantics drift"
+    }
   },
   "currentTaskId": null,
   "activePhase": null,
@@ -112,19 +205,44 @@
       "phase": 1,
       "parallel": false,
       "dependsOn": [],
-      "touches": ["bulk-invite-rules"],
-      "files": ["src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"],
-      "run": ["npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"],
-      "checks": ["tests fail before implementation"],
-      "acceptance": ["dangerous row outcomes are reproduced as explicit failing tests"],
-      "verification": ["npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"],
-      "evidence": ["failing test output"],
+      "touches": [
+        "bulk-invite-rules"
+      ],
+      "files": [
+        "src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"
+      ],
+      "run": [
+        "npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"
+      ],
+      "checks": [
+        "tests fail before implementation"
+      ],
+      "acceptance": [
+        "dangerous row outcomes are reproduced as explicit failing tests"
+      ],
+      "verification": [
+        "npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"
+      ],
+      "evidence": [
+        "failing test output"
+      ],
       "context": {
-        "readFiles": ["design.md", "tasks.md", "src/invite/bulk-import.ts"],
-        "commands": ["npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"],
-        "notes": ["freeze row semantics before broader execution"]
+        "readFiles": [
+          "design.md",
+          "tasks.md",
+          "src/invite/bulk-import.ts"
+        ],
+        "commands": [
+          "npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"
+        ],
+        "notes": [
+          "freeze row semantics before broader execution"
+        ]
+      },
+      "reviews": {
+        "spec": "pass",
+        "code": "pass"
       },
-      "reviews": { "spec": "pass", "code": "pass" },
       "status": "passed",
       "attempts": 1,
       "maxRetries": 1
@@ -135,20 +253,48 @@
       "type": "IMPL",
       "phase": 1,
       "parallel": false,
-      "dependsOn": ["T001"],
-      "touches": ["bulk-invite-rules"],
-      "files": ["src/invite/bulk-import.ts"],
-      "run": ["npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"],
-      "checks": ["rule tests pass"],
-      "acceptance": ["bulk invite rows receive deterministic initial states"],
-      "verification": ["npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"],
-      "evidence": ["passing test output", "checkpoint summary"],
+      "dependsOn": [
+        "T001"
+      ],
+      "touches": [
+        "bulk-invite-rules"
+      ],
+      "files": [
+        "src/invite/bulk-import.ts"
+      ],
+      "run": [
+        "npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"
+      ],
+      "checks": [
+        "rule tests pass"
+      ],
+      "acceptance": [
+        "bulk invite rows receive deterministic initial states"
+      ],
+      "verification": [
+        "npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"
+      ],
+      "evidence": [
+        "passing test output",
+        "checkpoint summary"
+      ],
       "context": {
-        "readFiles": ["design.md", "tasks.md", "src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"],
-        "commands": ["npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"],
-        "notes": ["do not invent partial-failure semantics outside the approved design"]
+        "readFiles": [
+          "design.md",
+          "tasks.md",
+          "src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"
+        ],
+        "commands": [
+          "npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts"
+        ],
+        "notes": [
+          "do not invent partial-failure semantics outside the approved design"
+        ]
+      },
+      "reviews": {
+        "spec": "pass",
+        "code": "pass"
       },
-      "reviews": { "spec": "pass", "code": "pass" },
       "status": "passed",
       "attempts": 1,
       "maxRetries": 1
@@ -159,20 +305,47 @@
       "type": "TEST",
       "phase": 2,
       "parallel": false,
-      "dependsOn": ["T002"],
-      "touches": ["admin-bulk-invite-ui"],
-      "files": ["src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"],
-      "run": ["npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"],
-      "checks": ["admin panel tests fail before UI integration"],
-      "acceptance": ["mixed row outcomes are visible as UI failures before implementation"],
-      "verification": ["npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"],
-      "evidence": ["failing test output"],
+      "dependsOn": [
+        "T002"
+      ],
+      "touches": [
+        "admin-bulk-invite-ui"
+      ],
+      "files": [
+        "src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
+      "run": [
+        "npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
+      "checks": [
+        "admin panel tests fail before UI integration"
+      ],
+      "acceptance": [
+        "mixed row outcomes are visible as UI failures before implementation"
+      ],
+      "verification": [
+        "npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
+      "evidence": [
+        "failing test output"
+      ],
       "context": {
-        "readFiles": ["design.md", "tasks.md", "src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.tsx"],
-        "commands": ["npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"],
-        "notes": ["UI must not hide ambiguous row states"]
+        "readFiles": [
+          "design.md",
+          "tasks.md",
+          "src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.tsx"
+        ],
+        "commands": [
+          "npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
+        ],
+        "notes": [
+          "UI must not hide ambiguous row states"
+        ]
+      },
+      "reviews": {
+        "spec": "pass",
+        "code": "pass"
       },
-      "reviews": { "spec": "pass", "code": "pass" },
       "status": "passed",
       "attempts": 1,
       "maxRetries": 1
@@ -183,20 +356,48 @@
       "type": "IMPL",
       "phase": 2,
       "parallel": false,
-      "dependsOn": ["T003"],
-      "touches": ["admin-bulk-invite-ui"],
-      "files": ["src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.tsx"],
-      "run": ["npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"],
-      "checks": ["admin panel tests pass"],
-      "acceptance": ["admins can see accepted, skipped, and rejected rows in the panel"],
-      "verification": ["npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"],
-      "evidence": ["passing test output", "review notes"],
+      "dependsOn": [
+        "T003"
+      ],
+      "touches": [
+        "admin-bulk-invite-ui"
+      ],
+      "files": [
+        "src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.tsx"
+      ],
+      "run": [
+        "npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
+      "checks": [
+        "admin panel tests pass"
+      ],
+      "acceptance": [
+        "admins can see accepted, skipped, and rejected rows in the panel"
+      ],
+      "verification": [
+        "npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
+      "evidence": [
+        "passing test output",
+        "review notes"
+      ],
       "context": {
-        "readFiles": ["design.md", "tasks.md", "src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"],
-        "commands": ["npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"],
-        "notes": ["surface row states without redefining backend truth"]
+        "readFiles": [
+          "design.md",
+          "tasks.md",
+          "src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
+        ],
+        "commands": [
+          "npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
+        ],
+        "notes": [
+          "surface row states without redefining backend truth"
+        ]
+      },
+      "reviews": {
+        "spec": "pass",
+        "code": "pass"
       },
-      "reviews": { "spec": "pass", "code": "pass" },
       "status": "passed",
       "attempts": 1,
       "maxRetries": 1
@@ -207,29 +408,52 @@
       "type": "OTHER",
       "phase": 3,
       "parallel": false,
-      "dependsOn": ["T004"],
-      "touches": ["quality-gates"],
-      "files": ["src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.tsx", "src/invite/bulk-import.ts"],
+      "dependsOn": [
+        "T004"
+      ],
+      "touches": [
+        "quality-gates"
+      ],
+      "files": [
+        "src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.tsx",
+        "src/invite/bulk-import.ts"
+      ],
       "run": [
         "npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts",
         "npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
       ],
-      "checks": ["targeted tests pass", "review evidence collected"],
-      "acceptance": ["fresh verification evidence exists for cc-check"],
+      "checks": [
+        "targeted tests pass",
+        "review evidence collected"
+      ],
+      "acceptance": [
+        "fresh verification evidence exists for cc-check"
+      ],
       "verification": [
         "npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts",
         "npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
       ],
-      "evidence": ["passing targeted test output", "review notes"],
+      "evidence": [
+        "passing targeted test output",
+        "review notes"
+      ],
       "context": {
-        "readFiles": ["tasks.md", "task-manifest.json"],
+        "readFiles": [
+          "tasks.md",
+          "task-manifest.json"
+        ],
         "commands": [
           "npm test -- src/invite/bulk-import.test.ts",
           "npm test -- src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.test.tsx"
         ],
-        "notes": ["fresh evidence can still block if the design contract is incomplete"]
+        "notes": [
+          "fresh evidence can still block if the design contract is incomplete"
+        ]
+      },
+      "reviews": {
+        "spec": "pass",
+        "code": "pass"
       },
-      "reviews": { "spec": "pass", "code": "pass" },
       "status": "passed",
       "attempts": 1,
       "maxRetries": 1

package/docs/examples/full-design-blocked/changes/REQ-002-bulk-invite-import/planning/tasks.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 - Requirement version: `REQ-002.v2`
 - Design version: `design.v2`
-- CC-Plan skill version: `3.7.7`
+- CC-Plan skill version: `3.8.1`
 - Source roadmap item: `RM-010`
 - Source roadmap version: `roadmap.v2`
 
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
   - Implementation decisions: reuse invite engine, billing checks, and audit contract after the row-outcome matrix is approved
   - Testing decisions: test bulk-import rules, admin upload flow, and audit mapping
   - Out of scope: SCIM provisioning, background jobs, rollback wizard
+- AI Leverage Decision Lens: sharp-wedge; AI can implement this bounded import path fast, but cc-check may still block final proof if row semantics drift
 - Read first:
   - `design.md`
   - `src/admin/BulkInvitePanel.tsx`

package/docs/examples/full-design-blocked/roadmap.json

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
   },
   "meta": {
     "roadmapVersion": "roadmap.v2",
-    "skillVersion": "5.0.0",
+    "skillVersion": "5.2.0",
     "status": "active",
     "lastUpdated": "2026-04-19",
     "currentFocusStage": "Stage 2"
@@ -14,7 +14,23 @@
     "planningPosture": "",
     "evidenceMaturity": "",
     "canonicalTerms": [],
-    "durableDecisionSources": []
+    "durableDecisionSources": [],
+    "aiLeverageRouteLens": {
+      "realUserOrOperator": "workspace admin onboarding 20-200 collaborators",
+      "statusQuoWorkaround": "paste individual invite emails or coordinate in spreadsheets",
+      "humanTeamEffortForFullScope": "multiple weeks across product, engineering, billing, and support review",
+      "ccAgentEffortForFullScope": "several hours once row semantics are approved, but unbounded before that",
+      "aiCompressionRatio": "high after semantics freeze, low while the product contract is ambiguous",
+      "completeLakeBoundary": "row classification, admin upload flow, billing-seat checks, and audit mapping after rule approval",
+      "oceanBoundary": "SCIM, background retries, rollback wizard, and unspecified billing semantics",
+      "scopeRecommendation": "sharp-wedge",
+      "firstSuccessSignal": "admins can predict duplicate, invalid, and over-limit outcomes",
+      "killSignal": "duplicate and seat-limit semantics remain unresolved",
+      "verdict": "sharp-wedge",
+      "missingEvidence": [
+        "none recorded at route handoff; cc-check later reopened duplicate, invalid-row, partial-success, and seat-limit semantics"
+      ]
+    }
   },
   "evidence": [],
   "route": {

package/docs/examples/local-handoff/BACKLOG.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 ## Backlog Meta
 
 - Roadmap version: `roadmap.v2`
-- Skill version: `5.0.0`
+- Skill version: `5.2.0`
 - Last synced: `2026-04-19`
 - Current focus stage: `Stage 2`
 - Roadmap state source: `roadmap.json`

package/docs/examples/local-handoff/README.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 - Example version: `1.0.0`
 - Last reviewed: `2026-04-17`
-- Bound skills: `cc-roadmap@5.0.0`, `cc-plan@3.7.7`, `cc-do@1.6.2`, `cc-check@1.10.1`, `cc-act@1.8.2`
+- Bound skills: `cc-roadmap@5.2.0`, `cc-plan@3.8.1`, `cc-do@1.6.2`, `cc-check@1.10.1`, `cc-act@1.8.2`
 
 This example shows verified work that is **ready to move forward**, but `cc-act` still chooses `local-handoff`.
 

package/docs/examples/local-handoff/ROADMAP.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 ## Roadmap Meta
 
 - Roadmap version: `roadmap.v3`
-- Skill version: `5.0.0`
+- Skill version: `5.2.0`
 - Status: `active`
 - Last updated: `2026-04-16`
 - Owner / decider: `product-owner`
@@ -27,6 +27,21 @@
 - Adoption / trust bottleneck: admins want proof they can take activity history out of the UI cleanly
 - Known unknowns: whether CSV alone is enough or if JSON export will be needed later
 
+## AI Leverage Route Lens
+
+- Real user / operator: workspace admin preparing weekly activity review notes
+- Status quo workaround: manually copy visible audit rows into an internal note
+- Human-team effort for full scope: about one day for an engineer to implement, test, and document the local export
+- CC / agent effort for full scope: about 30 minutes for visible-row CSV export plus targeted test and lint
+- AI compression ratio: roughly 10x for the bounded local export path
+- Complete-lake boundary: visible-row CSV export, panel action, current data source, targeted panel test, and lint
+- Ocean boundary: JSON export, scheduled reporting, shared reporting backend, and cross-panel reporting platform
+- Scope recommendation: `boil-lake`
+- First success signal: admins finish weekly review without manual row copying
+- Kill signal: implementation requires shared reporting pipeline redesign
+- Verdict: `boil-lake`
+- Missing evidence before ready-for-cc-plan: none
+
 ## Recommended Route
 
 - Recommendation: `wedge-first`

package/docs/examples/local-handoff/changes/REQ-003-audit-log-export/planning/design.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 - Requirement version: `REQ-003.v1`
 - Design version: `design.v1`
-- CC-Plan skill version: `3.7.7`
+- CC-Plan skill version: `3.8.1`
 - Requirement ID: `REQ-003`
 - Design mode: `tiny-design`
 - Why this stays `tiny-design`: the patch adds one export action inside the existing admin audit UI without changing data contracts
@@ -66,6 +66,30 @@
 - Risk: admins may soon ask for more export formats
 - Mitigation: treat JSON or scheduled exports as later roadmap items
 
+## AI Leverage Decision Lens
+
+- Real user / operator: workspace admin preparing weekly review notes
+- Status quo workaround: manually copy visible audit rows
+- Human-team effort for full scope: about one day for an engineer to implement, test, and document the local export
+- CC / agent effort for full scope: about 30 minutes for visible-row CSV export plus targeted test and lint
+- AI compression ratio: roughly 10x for the bounded local export path
+- Complete-lake boundary: visible-row CSV export, panel action, current data source, targeted panel test, and lint
+- Ocean boundary: JSON export, scheduled reporting, shared reporting backend, and cross-panel reporting platform
+- Scope recommendation: `boil-lake`
+- Cost model: low agent time, low human review time, targeted panel test plus lint, low maintenance cost while scoped to visible rows, reversible UI action
+- Verdict: `boil-lake`
+- Missing evidence or pivot reason: none
+
+## External Best-Practice Validation
+
+- Needed: No
+- Decision status: not-needed
+- Generalized search terms:
+- Sources checked:
+- Repo-fit verdict: skipped
+- Changes to frozen design:
+- Skipped reason: the local handoff exports existing visible rows and does not introduce a new reporting standard
+
 ## Review Gate
 
 - Placeholder scan: pass
@@ -74,6 +98,8 @@
 - Ambiguity scan: pass
 - Feasibility scan: pass
 - PRD brief scan: pass; the export story and scope boundaries are explicit
+- AI Leverage Decision Lens scan: pass; visible-row export lake is bounded enough to complete while reporting platform work stays out
+- External best-practice scan: pass; not needed for a repo-local visible-row export
 - Decision question scan: pass; `D1` approved the tiny-design CSV-export boundary
 - Final recommendation: approved as `tiny-design`