cc-devflow 4.5.5 → 4.5.7

package/docs/examples/local-handoff/changes/REQ-003-audit-log-export/planning/task-manifest.json

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
   "requirementId": "REQ-003",
   "requirementVersion": "REQ-003.v1",
   "planningMeta": {
-    "reqPlanSkillVersion": "3.7.5",
+    "reqPlanSkillVersion": "3.8.1",
     "designVersion": "design.v1",
     "approvedAt": "2026-04-16T13:10:00.000Z",
     "approvedBy": "user",
@@ -14,21 +14,102 @@
     "requirementBrief": {
       "problemStatement": "Admins can review audit summary rows in the UI, but weekly reporting requires manual copying.",
       "solutionSummary": "Add a CSV download action for the currently visible audit summary rows.",
-      "actors": ["workspace admin reviewing weekly activity"],
+      "actors": [
+        "workspace admin reviewing weekly activity"
+      ],
       "userStories": [
         {
           "id": "US-001",
           "actor": "workspace admin",
           "want": "download visible audit summary rows as CSV",
           "benefit": "include them in weekly reporting without manual copying",
-          "acceptance": ["Panel behavior test proves the export action uses current summary rows"]
+          "acceptance": [
+            "Panel behavior test proves the export action uses current summary rows"
+          ]
         }
       ],
       "edgeOrRecoveryStories": [],
-      "implementationDecisions": ["Export only rows already visible in the panel", "Keep CSV as the only output format"],
-      "testingDecisions": ["Test through the admin panel action and visible row data"],
-      "outOfScope": ["JSON export", "scheduled reporting", "shared reporting backend"],
-      "furtherNotes": ["Richer machine-readable exports should become a separate requirement"]
+      "implementationDecisions": [
+        "Export only rows already visible in the panel",
+        "Keep CSV as the only output format"
+      ],
+      "testingDecisions": [
+        "Test through the admin panel action and visible row data"
+      ],
+      "outOfScope": [
+        "JSON export",
+        "scheduled reporting",
+        "shared reporting backend"
+      ],
+      "furtherNotes": [
+        "Richer machine-readable exports should become a separate requirement"
+      ]
+    },
+    "externalBestPractice": {
+      "needed": false,
+      "decisionStatus": "not-needed",
+      "decisionQuestionId": "",
+      "privacyGuard": "generalized terms only; no project names, private requirements, customer names, secrets, logs, or proprietary concepts",
+      "generalizedSearchTerms": [],
+      "sourcesChecked": [],
+      "conventionalWisdom": "",
+      "currentDiscourse": "",
+      "repoFitVerdict": "skipped",
+      "designImpacts": [],
+      "skippedReason": "the local handoff exports existing visible rows and does not introduce a new reporting standard"
+    },
+    "decisionQuestions": [
+      {
+        "questionId": "D1",
+        "gate": "approach-approval",
+        "knownEvidence": [
+          "Existing admin panel already owns the visible summary rows",
+          "No reporting backend is needed for the first useful export"
+        ],
+        "recommendation": "Approve the tiny-design CSV export",
+        "options": [
+          {
+            "id": "A",
+            "label": "Tiny design CSV export",
+            "recommended": true,
+            "completeness": "8/10",
+            "good": "Solves weekly reporting friction with the current panel data",
+            "costRisk": "Does not handle JSON, scheduling, or shared reporting contracts"
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "B",
+            "label": "Shared reporting pipeline",
+            "recommended": false,
+            "completeness": "10/10",
+            "good": "Could support more formats and future scheduled reports",
+            "costRisk": "Creates a larger platform surface before the local export is proven"
+          }
+        ],
+        "userChoice": "A",
+        "impact": "cc-do exports only visible rows from the current panel and avoids new reporting contracts",
+        "status": "answered"
+      }
+    ],
+    "aiLeverageDecisionLens": {
+      "realUserOrOperator": "workspace admin preparing weekly review notes",
+      "statusQuoWorkaround": "manual copy of visible audit rows",
+      "humanTeamEffortForFullScope": "about one day for an engineer to implement, test, and document the local export",
+      "ccAgentEffortForFullScope": "about 30 minutes for visible-row CSV export plus targeted test and lint",
+      "aiCompressionRatio": "roughly 10x for the bounded local export path",
+      "completeLakeBoundary": "visible-row CSV export, panel action, current data source, targeted panel test, and lint",
+      "oceanBoundary": "JSON export, scheduled reporting, shared reporting backend, and cross-panel reporting platform",
+      "scopeRecommendation": "boil-lake",
+      "costModel": {
+        "agentTime": "low",
+        "humanReviewTime": "low",
+        "verificationCost": "targeted panel test plus lint",
+        "maintenanceCost": "low while scoped to visible rows",
+        "failureCost": "admins keep copying rows manually",
+        "reversibility": "reversible UI action"
+      },
+      "verdict": "boil-lake",
+      "missingEvidenceOrPivotReason": "",
+      "impactOnApprovedDirection": "complete the local visible-row export lake while deferring reporting platform work"
     }
   },
   "currentTaskId": null,
@@ -41,19 +122,45 @@
       "phase": 1,
       "parallel": false,
       "dependsOn": [],
-      "touches": ["audit-summary", "tests"],
-      "files": ["src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"],
-      "run": ["npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"],
-      "checks": ["test fails before implementation"],
-      "acceptance": ["the missing download action is reproduced as a failing test"],
-      "verification": ["npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"],
-      "evidence": ["failing test output"],
+      "touches": [
+        "audit-summary",
+        "tests"
+      ],
+      "files": [
+        "src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
+      "run": [
+        "npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
+      "checks": [
+        "test fails before implementation"
+      ],
+      "acceptance": [
+        "the missing download action is reproduced as a failing test"
+      ],
+      "verification": [
+        "npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
+      "evidence": [
+        "failing test output"
+      ],
       "context": {
-        "readFiles": ["design.md", "tasks.md", "src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.tsx"],
-        "commands": ["npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"],
-        "notes": ["stay inside the current audit summary panel"]
+        "readFiles": [
+          "design.md",
+          "tasks.md",
+          "src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.tsx"
+        ],
+        "commands": [
+          "npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"
+        ],
+        "notes": [
+          "stay inside the current audit summary panel"
+        ]
+      },
+      "reviews": {
+        "spec": "pass",
+        "code": "pass"
       },
-      "reviews": { "spec": "pass", "code": "pass" },
       "status": "passed",
       "attempts": 1,
       "maxRetries": 1
@@ -64,20 +171,48 @@
       "type": "IMPL",
       "phase": 1,
       "parallel": false,
-      "dependsOn": ["T001"],
-      "touches": ["audit-summary"],
-      "files": ["src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.tsx"],
-      "run": ["npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"],
-      "checks": ["panel test passes"],
-      "acceptance": ["admins can trigger a CSV download from the existing summary panel"],
-      "verification": ["npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"],
-      "evidence": ["passing test output", "checkpoint summary"],
+      "dependsOn": [
+        "T001"
+      ],
+      "touches": [
+        "audit-summary"
+      ],
+      "files": [
+        "src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.tsx"
+      ],
+      "run": [
+        "npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
+      "checks": [
+        "panel test passes"
+      ],
+      "acceptance": [
+        "admins can trigger a CSV download from the existing summary panel"
+      ],
+      "verification": [
+        "npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
+      "evidence": [
+        "passing test output",
+        "checkpoint summary"
+      ],
       "context": {
-        "readFiles": ["design.md", "tasks.md", "src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"],
-        "commands": ["npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"],
-        "notes": ["reuse visible summary rows as the export source"]
+        "readFiles": [
+          "design.md",
+          "tasks.md",
+          "src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"
+        ],
+        "commands": [
+          "npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"
+        ],
+        "notes": [
+          "reuse visible summary rows as the export source"
+        ]
+      },
+      "reviews": {
+        "spec": "pass",
+        "code": "pass"
       },
-      "reviews": { "spec": "pass", "code": "pass" },
       "status": "passed",
       "attempts": 1,
       "maxRetries": 1
@@ -88,29 +223,52 @@
       "type": "OTHER",
       "phase": 2,
       "parallel": false,
-      "dependsOn": ["T002"],
-      "touches": ["quality-gates"],
-      "files": ["src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.tsx", "src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"],
+      "dependsOn": [
+        "T002"
+      ],
+      "touches": [
+        "quality-gates"
+      ],
+      "files": [
+        "src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.tsx",
+        "src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx"
+      ],
       "run": [
         "npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx",
         "npm run lint -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.tsx"
       ],
-      "checks": ["targeted tests pass", "lint passes"],
-      "acceptance": ["fresh verification evidence exists for local handoff"],
+      "checks": [
+        "targeted tests pass",
+        "lint passes"
+      ],
+      "acceptance": [
+        "fresh verification evidence exists for local handoff"
+      ],
       "verification": [
         "npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx",
         "npm run lint -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.tsx"
       ],
-      "evidence": ["passing test output", "clean lint output"],
+      "evidence": [
+        "passing test output",
+        "clean lint output"
+      ],
       "context": {
-        "readFiles": ["tasks.md", "task-manifest.json"],
+        "readFiles": [
+          "tasks.md",
+          "task-manifest.json"
+        ],
         "commands": [
           "npm test -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.test.tsx",
           "npm run lint -- src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.tsx"
         ],
-        "notes": ["remote push is intentionally out of scope for this example"]
+        "notes": [
+          "remote push is intentionally out of scope for this example"
+        ]
+      },
+      "reviews": {
+        "spec": "pass",
+        "code": "pass"
       },
-      "reviews": { "spec": "pass", "code": "pass" },
       "status": "passed",
       "attempts": 1,
       "maxRetries": 1

package/docs/examples/local-handoff/changes/REQ-003-audit-log-export/planning/tasks.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 - Requirement version: `REQ-003.v1`
 - Design version: `design.v1`
-- CC-Plan skill version: `3.7.5`
+- CC-Plan skill version: `3.8.1`
 - Source roadmap item: `RM-020`
 - Source roadmap version: `roadmap.v3`
 
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
   - Implementation decisions: export visible rows only, CSV only
   - Testing decisions: test through admin panel action and visible row data
   - Out of scope: JSON export, scheduled reporting, shared reporting backend
+- AI Leverage Decision Lens: boil-lake; complete visible-row CSV export while keeping reporting-platform work outside the lake
 - Read first:
   - `design.md`
   - `src/admin/AuditSummaryPanel.tsx`

package/docs/examples/local-handoff/roadmap.json

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
   },
   "meta": {
     "roadmapVersion": "roadmap.v2",
-    "skillVersion": "5.0.0",
+    "skillVersion": "5.2.0",
     "status": "active",
     "lastUpdated": "2026-04-19",
     "currentFocusStage": "Stage 2"
@@ -14,7 +14,21 @@
     "planningPosture": "",
     "evidenceMaturity": "",
     "canonicalTerms": [],
-    "durableDecisionSources": []
+    "durableDecisionSources": [],
+    "aiLeverageRouteLens": {
+      "realUserOrOperator": "workspace admin preparing weekly activity review notes",
+      "statusQuoWorkaround": "manual copy of visible audit rows into an internal note",
+      "humanTeamEffortForFullScope": "about one day for an engineer to implement, test, and document the local export",
+      "ccAgentEffortForFullScope": "about 30 minutes for visible-row CSV export plus targeted test and lint",
+      "aiCompressionRatio": "roughly 10x for the bounded local export path",
+      "completeLakeBoundary": "visible-row CSV export, panel action, current data source, targeted panel test, and lint",
+      "oceanBoundary": "JSON export, scheduled reporting, shared reporting backend, and cross-panel reporting platform",
+      "scopeRecommendation": "boil-lake",
+      "firstSuccessSignal": "admins finish weekly review without manual row copying",
+      "killSignal": "implementation requires shared reporting pipeline redesign",
+      "verdict": "boil-lake",
+      "missingEvidence": []
+    }
   },
   "evidence": [],
   "route": {

package/docs/examples/pdca-loop/BACKLOG.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 ## Backlog Meta
 
 - Roadmap version: `roadmap.v1`
-- Skill version: `5.0.0`
+- Skill version: `5.2.0`
 - Last synced: `2026-04-19`
 - Current focus stage: `Stage 1`
 - Roadmap state source: `roadmap.json`

package/docs/examples/pdca-loop/README.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 - Example version: `1.0.0`
 - Last reviewed: `2026-04-17`
-- Bound skills: `cc-roadmap@5.0.0`, `cc-plan@3.7.5`, `cc-do@1.6.2`, `cc-check@1.10.1`, `cc-act@1.8.2`
+- Bound skills: `cc-roadmap@5.2.0`, `cc-plan@3.8.1`, `cc-do@1.6.2`, `cc-check@1.10.1`, `cc-act@1.8.2`
 
 This folder shows one minimal but complete `cc-roadmap -> cc-plan -> cc-do -> cc-check -> cc-act` loop.
 

package/docs/examples/pdca-loop/ROADMAP.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 ## Roadmap Meta
 
 - Roadmap version: `roadmap.v1`
-- Skill version: `5.0.0`
+- Skill version: `5.2.0`
 - Status: `active`
 - Last updated: `2026-04-15`
 - Owner / decider: `product-owner`
@@ -36,6 +36,21 @@
 | Feasibility | Existing dialog already renders the URL and clipboard API is available | High | current UI behavior | This is a tiny patch, not a redesign |
 | Distribution | Successful sharing unlocks more beta seats | Med | product notes | A smoother invite loop increases activation |
 
+## AI Leverage Route Lens
+
+- Real user / operator: workspace member sharing an invite during beta onboarding
+- Status quo workaround: manually select and copy the visible invite URL
+- Human-team effort for full scope: about half a day for one engineer including test and review
+- CC / agent effort for full scope: about 20 minutes for a targeted UI patch plus test update
+- AI compression ratio: roughly 10x for this bounded UI slice
+- Complete-lake boundary: copy action, current invite URL source, copied-state feedback, and dialog behavior test
+- Ocean boundary: backend invite generation, permissions, analytics, and clipboard fallback redesign
+- Scope recommendation: `boil-lake`
+- First success signal: users copy the invite link without asking support
+- Kill signal: implementation requires backend or permission changes
+- Verdict: `boil-lake`
+- Missing evidence before ready-for-cc-plan: none
+
 ## Route Options
 
 | Shape | Why this could work | Why this may fail | Decision |

package/docs/examples/pdca-loop/changes/REQ-001-copy-invite-link/planning/design.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 - Requirement version: `REQ-001.v1`
 - Design version: `design.v1`
-- CC-Plan skill version: `3.7.5`
+- CC-Plan skill version: `3.8.1`
 - Requirement ID: `REQ-001`
 - Design mode: `tiny-design`
 - Why this stays `tiny-design`: the patch is limited to an existing dialog and test file, with no API or data model changes
@@ -67,6 +67,30 @@
 - Risk: copied-state feedback may be too subtle for users
 - Mitigation: keep the first patch minimal and log a follow-up roadmap item if support friction remains
 
+## AI Leverage Decision Lens
+
+- Real user / operator: workspace member sharing an invite
+- Status quo workaround: manually select the visible invite URL
+- Human-team effort for full scope: about half a day for one engineer including test and review
+- CC / agent effort for full scope: about 20 minutes for a targeted UI patch plus test update
+- AI compression ratio: roughly 10x for this bounded UI slice
+- Complete-lake boundary: copy action, current invite URL source, copied-state feedback, and dialog behavior test
+- Ocean boundary: invite generation, permissions, analytics, and clipboard fallback redesign
+- Scope recommendation: `boil-lake`
+- Cost model: low agent time, low human review time, targeted dialog test, no backend maintenance cost, reversible UI patch
+- Verdict: `boil-lake`
+- Missing evidence or pivot reason: none
+
+## External Best-Practice Validation
+
+- Needed: No
+- Decision status: not-needed
+- Generalized search terms:
+- Sources checked:
+- Repo-fit verdict: skipped
+- Changes to frozen design:
+- Skipped reason: existing share-dialog behavior and repo tests are sufficient for the tiny design
+
 ## Review Gate
 
 - Placeholder scan: pass
@@ -75,8 +99,17 @@
 - Ambiguity scan: pass; execution does not need to re-decide button placement or clipboard source
 - Feasibility scan: pass; existing dialog and tests already cover the target surface
 - PRD brief scan: pass; problem, story, implementation decision, testing decision, and out-of-scope are durable
+- AI Leverage Decision Lens scan: pass; bounded same-dialog lake is cheap enough to complete, not just render a happy-path button
+- External best-practice scan: pass; not needed for a repo-local tiny design
+- Decision question scan: pass; `D1` approved the tiny-design copy-action boundary
 - Final recommendation: approved as `tiny-design`
 
+## Decision Questions
+
+| ID | Gate | Known evidence | Recommendation | User choice | Impact on `cc-do` | Status |
+|----|------|----------------|----------------|-------------|-------------------|--------|
+| D1 | approach-approval | Existing dialog already renders the invite URL and the change stays inside one UI/test surface | Approve the tiny-design copy action | Tiny design copy action | Keep implementation inside the share dialog; do not add backend or permission work | answered |
+
 ## Approval
 
 - User approval status: approved

package/docs/examples/pdca-loop/changes/REQ-001-copy-invite-link/planning/task-manifest.json

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
   "sourceRoadmap": {
     "itemId": "RM-001",
     "roadmapVersion": "roadmap.v1",
-    "roadmapSkillVersion": "5.0.0",
+    "roadmapSkillVersion": "5.2.0",
     "sourceStage": "Stage 1",
     "successSignal": "Users can copy the invite link with one click",
     "killSignal": "The patch requires backend or permission changes",
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
     ]
   },
   "planningMeta": {
-    "reqPlanSkillVersion": "3.7.5",
+    "reqPlanSkillVersion": "3.8.1",
     "designVersion": "design.v1",
     "approvedAt": "2026-04-15T10:05:00.000Z",
     "approvedBy": "user",
@@ -30,21 +30,102 @@
     "requirementBrief": {
       "problemStatement": "Users can see the invite URL, but copying it still requires manual selection.",
       "solutionSummary": "Add a one-click copy action with lightweight confirmation inside the existing share dialog.",
-      "actors": ["workspace member sharing an invite"],
+      "actors": [
+        "workspace member sharing an invite"
+      ],
       "userStories": [
         {
           "id": "US-001",
           "actor": "workspace member",
           "want": "copy the invite link with one click",
           "benefit": "share it without manually selecting text",
-          "acceptance": ["Dialog behavior test proves the current invite URL is copied"]
+          "acceptance": [
+            "Dialog behavior test proves the current invite URL is copied"
+          ]
         }
       ],
       "edgeOrRecoveryStories": [],
-      "implementationDecisions": ["Reuse the existing invite URL source and dialog props"],
-      "testingDecisions": ["Test through the share dialog behavior, not an internal helper"],
-      "outOfScope": ["invite generation", "role controls", "analytics", "clipboard fallback redesign"],
-      "furtherNotes": ["Richer copied-state feedback is a separate UX requirement"]
+      "implementationDecisions": [
+        "Reuse the existing invite URL source and dialog props"
+      ],
+      "testingDecisions": [
+        "Test through the share dialog behavior, not an internal helper"
+      ],
+      "outOfScope": [
+        "invite generation",
+        "role controls",
+        "analytics",
+        "clipboard fallback redesign"
+      ],
+      "furtherNotes": [
+        "Richer copied-state feedback is a separate UX requirement"
+      ]
+    },
+    "externalBestPractice": {
+      "needed": false,
+      "decisionStatus": "not-needed",
+      "decisionQuestionId": "",
+      "privacyGuard": "generalized terms only; no project names, private requirements, customer names, secrets, logs, or proprietary concepts",
+      "generalizedSearchTerms": [],
+      "sourcesChecked": [],
+      "conventionalWisdom": "",
+      "currentDiscourse": "",
+      "repoFitVerdict": "skipped",
+      "designImpacts": [],
+      "skippedReason": "existing share-dialog behavior and repo tests are sufficient for the tiny design"
+    },
+    "decisionQuestions": [
+      {
+        "questionId": "D1",
+        "gate": "approach-approval",
+        "knownEvidence": [
+          "Existing dialog already renders the invite URL",
+          "The patch stays inside one UI/test surface"
+        ],
+        "recommendation": "Approve the tiny-design copy action",
+        "options": [
+          {
+            "id": "A",
+            "label": "Tiny design copy action",
+            "recommended": true,
+            "completeness": "8/10",
+            "good": "Ships the visible user win with one dialog and one behavior test",
+            "costRisk": "Leaves richer feedback and clipboard fallback work for later"
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "B",
+            "label": "Full share-flow redesign",
+            "recommended": false,
+            "completeness": "10/10",
+            "good": "Could solve broader invite UX issues in one larger pass",
+            "costRisk": "Expands beyond the roadmap wedge and touches unrelated share contracts"
+          }
+        ],
+        "userChoice": "A",
+        "impact": "cc-do keeps implementation inside the share dialog and avoids backend or permission work",
+        "status": "answered"
+      }
+    ],
+    "aiLeverageDecisionLens": {
+      "realUserOrOperator": "workspace member sharing an invite",
+      "statusQuoWorkaround": "manual selection and copy of the visible invite URL",
+      "humanTeamEffortForFullScope": "about half a day for one engineer including test and review",
+      "ccAgentEffortForFullScope": "about 20 minutes for a targeted UI patch plus test update",
+      "aiCompressionRatio": "roughly 10x for this bounded UI slice",
+      "completeLakeBoundary": "copy action, current invite URL source, copied-state feedback, and dialog behavior test",
+      "oceanBoundary": "invite generation, permissions, analytics, or clipboard fallback redesign",
+      "scopeRecommendation": "boil-lake",
+      "costModel": {
+        "agentTime": "low",
+        "humanReviewTime": "low",
+        "verificationCost": "targeted dialog test",
+        "maintenanceCost": "low while scoped to the dialog",
+        "failureCost": "sharing friction remains",
+        "reversibility": "reversible UI patch"
+      },
+      "verdict": "boil-lake",
+      "missingEvidenceOrPivotReason": "",
+      "impactOnApprovedDirection": "cover the full same-dialog copy lake instead of only a happy-path button render"
     }
   },
   "currentTaskId": null,

package/docs/examples/pdca-loop/changes/REQ-001-copy-invite-link/planning/tasks.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 - Requirement version: `REQ-001.v1`
 - Design version: `design.v1`
-- CC-Plan skill version: `3.7.5`
+- CC-Plan skill version: `3.8.1`
 - Source roadmap item: `RM-001`
 - Source roadmap version: `roadmap.v1`
 
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
   - Implementation decisions: reuse existing invite URL source and dialog props
   - Testing decisions: test through share dialog behavior
   - Out of scope: invite generation, role controls, analytics, clipboard fallback redesign
+- AI Leverage Decision Lens: boil-lake; complete the bounded same-dialog copy lake instead of stopping at a happy-path button
 - Read first:
   - `design.md`
   - `src/features/share/ShareDialog.tsx`

package/docs/examples/pdca-loop/roadmap.json

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
   },
   "meta": {
     "roadmapVersion": "roadmap.v1",
-    "skillVersion": "5.0.0",
+    "skillVersion": "5.2.0",
     "status": "active",
     "lastUpdated": "2026-04-19",
     "currentFocusStage": "Stage 1"
@@ -14,7 +14,21 @@
     "planningPosture": "",
     "evidenceMaturity": "",
     "canonicalTerms": [],
-    "durableDecisionSources": []
+    "durableDecisionSources": [],
+    "aiLeverageRouteLens": {
+      "realUserOrOperator": "workspace member sharing an invite during beta onboarding",
+      "statusQuoWorkaround": "manual selection and copy of the visible invite URL",
+      "humanTeamEffortForFullScope": "about half a day for one engineer including test and review",
+      "ccAgentEffortForFullScope": "about 20 minutes for a targeted UI patch plus test update",
+      "aiCompressionRatio": "roughly 10x for this bounded UI slice",
+      "completeLakeBoundary": "copy action, current invite URL source, copied-state feedback, and dialog behavior test",
+      "oceanBoundary": "backend invite generation, permissions, analytics, and clipboard fallback redesign",
+      "scopeRecommendation": "boil-lake",
+      "firstSuccessSignal": "users copy the invite link without asking support",
+      "killSignal": "implementation requires backend or permission changes",
+      "verdict": "boil-lake",
+      "missingEvidence": []
+    }
   },
   "evidence": [],
   "route": {

package/docs/examples/scripts/check-example-bindings.sh

@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ ROADMAP_VERSION="$(skill_version cc-roadmap)"
 REQ_PLAN_VERSION="$(skill_version cc-plan)"
 INVESTIGATE_VERSION="$(skill_version cc-investigate)"
 REQ_DO_VERSION="$(skill_version cc-do)"
+REQ_REVIEW_VERSION="$(skill_version cc-review)"
 REQ_CHECK_VERSION="$(skill_version cc-check)"
 REQ_ACT_VERSION="$(skill_version cc-act)"
 
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ for pair in \
   "cc-plan:$REQ_PLAN_VERSION" \
   "cc-investigate:$INVESTIGATE_VERSION" \
   "cc-do:$REQ_DO_VERSION" \
+  "cc-review:$REQ_REVIEW_VERSION" \
   "cc-check:$REQ_CHECK_VERSION" \
   "cc-act:$REQ_ACT_VERSION"
 do