cc-codeconductor 1.3.0 → 1.4.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (58) hide show
  1. package/README.md +21 -16
  2. package/dist/index.js +7240 -6446
  3. package/dist/library.js +196 -164
  4. package/dist/utils/cli-bin.d.ts +16 -0
  5. package/docs/generated/cli.md +202 -0
  6. package/package.json +3 -1
  7. package/presets/agy/skills/android-ui-design/SKILL.md +119 -0
  8. package/presets/agy/skills/cc-feature/SKILL.md +22 -0
  9. package/presets/agy/skills/cc-fix/SKILL.md +22 -0
  10. package/presets/agy/skills/cc-review/SKILL.md +22 -0
  11. package/presets/agy/skills/openspec/SKILL.md +20 -0
  12. package/presets/agy/skills/using-cc-skills/SKILL.md +21 -0
  13. package/presets/agy/skills/web-design-engineering/SKILL.md +101 -0
  14. package/presets/agy/workflows/cc-feature.md +22 -0
  15. package/presets/agy/workflows/cc-fix.md +22 -0
  16. package/presets/agy/workflows/cc-openspec.md +22 -0
  17. package/presets/agy/workflows/cc-review.md +22 -0
  18. package/presets/claude/commands/cc/feature.md +22 -0
  19. package/presets/claude/commands/cc/fix.md +22 -0
  20. package/presets/claude/commands/cc/openspec.md +22 -0
  21. package/presets/claude/commands/cc/review.md +22 -0
  22. package/presets/claude/skills/android/SKILL.md +4 -0
  23. package/presets/claude/skills/android-ui-design/SKILL.md +119 -0
  24. package/presets/claude/skills/openspec/SKILL.md +20 -0
  25. package/presets/claude/skills/using-cc-skills/SKILL.md +21 -0
  26. package/presets/claude/skills/web-design-engineering/SKILL.md +101 -0
  27. package/presets/codex/skills/android/SKILL.md +4 -0
  28. package/presets/codex/skills/android-ui-design/SKILL.md +119 -0
  29. package/presets/codex/skills/cc-feature/SKILL.md +22 -0
  30. package/presets/codex/skills/cc-fix/SKILL.md +22 -0
  31. package/presets/codex/skills/cc-openspec/SKILL.md +22 -0
  32. package/presets/codex/skills/cc-review/SKILL.md +22 -0
  33. package/presets/codex/skills/openspec/SKILL.md +20 -0
  34. package/presets/codex/skills/using-cc-skills/SKILL.md +21 -0
  35. package/presets/codex/skills/web-design-engineering/SKILL.md +101 -0
  36. package/presets/cursor/commands/cc/feature.md +22 -0
  37. package/presets/cursor/commands/cc/fix.md +22 -0
  38. package/presets/cursor/commands/cc/openspec.md +22 -0
  39. package/presets/cursor/commands/cc/review.md +22 -0
  40. package/presets/cursor/skills/android/SKILL.md +4 -0
  41. package/presets/cursor/skills/android-ui-design/SKILL.md +119 -0
  42. package/presets/cursor/skills/openspec/SKILL.md +20 -0
  43. package/presets/cursor/skills/using-cc-skills/SKILL.md +21 -0
  44. package/presets/cursor/skills/web-design-engineering/SKILL.md +101 -0
  45. package/presets/gemini/commands/cc/feature.toml +22 -0
  46. package/presets/gemini/commands/cc/fix.toml +22 -0
  47. package/presets/gemini/commands/cc/openspec.toml +22 -0
  48. package/presets/gemini/commands/cc/review.toml +22 -0
  49. package/presets/opencode/commands/cc-feature.md +22 -0
  50. package/presets/opencode/commands/cc-fix.md +22 -0
  51. package/presets/opencode/commands/cc-openspec.md +22 -0
  52. package/presets/opencode/commands/cc-review.md +22 -0
  53. package/presets/opencode/skills/android/SKILL.md +4 -0
  54. package/presets/opencode/skills/android-ui-design/SKILL.md +119 -0
  55. package/presets/opencode/skills/openspec/SKILL.md +20 -0
  56. package/presets/opencode/skills/using-cc-skills/SKILL.md +21 -0
  57. package/presets/opencode/skills/web-design-engineering/SKILL.md +101 -0
  58. package/src/presets/shared-skills.yml +4 -0
@@ -8,6 +8,28 @@ description:
8
8
 
9
9
  Feature request: $ARGUMENTS
10
10
 
11
+ ## Web interface scope
12
+
13
+ When the task concerns web layout, component states, feedback, motion, or a
14
+ requested UI audit, apply skill `web-design-engineering` from the installed skill
15
+ library. Use it during intake/discovery, design, test/implement, and review as
16
+ applicable; keep this workflow’s gates and TDD order. Framework presence alone
17
+ does not activate it; backend-only and native mobile work are excluded. Record
18
+ required visual checks as pending when unavailable. Keep findings in the existing
19
+ Review Report: contract failures in Spec Axis, technical issues in existing
20
+ subchecks, and aesthetic preferences as suggestions; do not add an axis.
21
+
22
+ ## Android phone interface scope
23
+
24
+ When the task concerns concrete Jetpack Compose phone layout, component states,
25
+ interaction, accessibility, visual behavior, or a requested UI audit, apply skill
26
+ `android-ui-design`. Use it during design, test/implementation, and review as
27
+ applicable while keeping this workflow's gates and TDD order. Kotlin, Compose,
28
+ framework, or dependency presence alone does not activate it; non-UI Android work
29
+ stays with the general `android` skill. Audit-only requests remain read-only, and
30
+ unavailable visual or emulator checks remain pending rather than claimed complete.
31
+
32
+
11
33
  ## Step 0 — CCEP Bootstrap
12
34
 
13
35
  Command: `feature` (fixed for this workflow — do not infer from user text)
@@ -18,6 +18,28 @@ Provide the following information in $ARGUMENTS:
18
18
 
19
19
  ---
20
20
 
21
+ ## Web interface scope
22
+
23
+ When the task concerns web layout, component states, feedback, motion, or a
24
+ requested UI audit, apply skill `web-design-engineering` from the installed skill
25
+ library. Use it during intake/discovery, design, test/implement, and review as
26
+ applicable; keep this workflow’s gates and TDD order. Framework presence alone
27
+ does not activate it; backend-only and native mobile work are excluded. Record
28
+ required visual checks as pending when unavailable. Keep findings in the existing
29
+ Review Report: contract failures in Spec Axis, technical issues in existing
30
+ subchecks, and aesthetic preferences as suggestions; do not add an axis.
31
+
32
+ ## Android phone interface scope
33
+
34
+ When the task concerns concrete Jetpack Compose phone layout, component states,
35
+ interaction, accessibility, visual behavior, or a requested UI audit, apply skill
36
+ `android-ui-design`. Use it during design, test/implementation, and review as
37
+ applicable while keeping this workflow's gates and TDD order. Kotlin, Compose,
38
+ framework, or dependency presence alone does not activate it; non-UI Android work
39
+ stays with the general `android` skill. Audit-only requests remain read-only, and
40
+ unavailable visual or emulator checks remain pending rather than claimed complete.
41
+
42
+
21
43
  ## Step 0 — CCEP Bootstrap
22
44
 
23
45
  Command: `fix` (fixed for this workflow — do not infer from user text)
@@ -10,6 +10,28 @@ Scope: $ARGUMENTS
10
10
 
11
11
  ---
12
12
 
13
+ ## Web interface scope
14
+
15
+ When the task concerns web layout, component states, feedback, motion, or a
16
+ requested UI audit, apply skill `web-design-engineering` from the installed skill
17
+ library. Use it during intake/discovery, design, test/implement, and review as
18
+ applicable; keep this workflow’s gates and TDD order. Framework presence alone
19
+ does not activate it; backend-only and native mobile work are excluded. Record
20
+ required visual checks as pending when unavailable. Keep findings in the existing
21
+ Review Report: contract failures in Spec Axis, technical issues in existing
22
+ subchecks, and aesthetic preferences as suggestions; do not add an axis.
23
+
24
+ ## Android phone interface scope
25
+
26
+ When the task concerns concrete Jetpack Compose phone layout, component states,
27
+ interaction, accessibility, visual behavior, or a requested UI audit, apply skill
28
+ `android-ui-design`. Use it during design, test/implementation, and review as
29
+ applicable while keeping this workflow's gates and TDD order. Kotlin, Compose,
30
+ framework, or dependency presence alone does not activate it; non-UI Android work
31
+ stays with the general `android` skill. Audit-only requests remain read-only, and
32
+ unavailable visual or emulator checks remain pending rather than claimed complete.
33
+
34
+
13
35
  ## Step 0 — Validate (mandatory gate)
14
36
 
15
37
  Run `npx cc-codeconductor openspec validate`. If invalid, show errors and recommendations, then **STOP**.
@@ -17,6 +17,28 @@ Specify what to review. Accepted formats:
17
17
 
18
18
  ---
19
19
 
20
+ ## Web interface scope
21
+
22
+ When the task concerns web layout, component states, feedback, motion, or a
23
+ requested UI audit, apply skill `web-design-engineering` from the installed skill
24
+ library. Use it during intake/discovery, design, test/implement, and review as
25
+ applicable; keep this workflow’s gates and TDD order. Framework presence alone
26
+ does not activate it; backend-only and native mobile work are excluded. Record
27
+ required visual checks as pending when unavailable. Keep findings in the existing
28
+ Review Report: contract failures in Spec Axis, technical issues in existing
29
+ subchecks, and aesthetic preferences as suggestions; do not add an axis.
30
+
31
+ ## Android phone interface scope
32
+
33
+ When the task concerns concrete Jetpack Compose phone layout, component states,
34
+ interaction, accessibility, visual behavior, or a requested UI audit, apply skill
35
+ `android-ui-design`. Use it during design, test/implementation, and review as
36
+ applicable while keeping this workflow's gates and TDD order. Kotlin, Compose,
37
+ framework, or dependency presence alone does not activate it; non-UI Android work
38
+ stays with the general `android` skill. Audit-only requests remain read-only, and
39
+ unavailable visual or emulator checks remain pending rather than claimed complete.
40
+
41
+
20
42
  ## Step 0 — CCEP Bootstrap
21
43
 
22
44
  Command: `review` (fixed for this workflow — do not infer from user text)
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ quality:
35
35
 
36
36
  This playbook defines the architecture, UI design system, performance guidelines, and testing strategy for native Android applications.
37
37
 
38
+ `android-ui-design` owns specialized Jetpack Compose phone UI/UX design,
39
+ implementation, review, and audit guidance. This skill remains the general guide
40
+ for architecture, Hilt dependency injection, Media3, performance, and testing.
41
+
38
42
  ---
39
43
 
40
44
  ## 1. Lead Architect & Modularization
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: android-ui-design
3
+ description: >-
4
+ Design, implement, review, and audit Android Jetpack Compose UI/UX for phone
5
+ interfaces. Use when a request concerns concrete Compose layout, components,
6
+ interaction, accessibility, or visual behavior. Do not activate for framework
7
+ or dependency presence alone; non-UI Android work is excluded.
8
+ ---
9
+
10
+ # Android UI design
11
+
12
+ Apply this specialized guidance to Android phone interfaces built with Jetpack
13
+ Compose. Keep the active `cc-feature`, `cc-fix`, `cc-review`, or `cc-openspec`
14
+ workflow and its gates; this skill contributes UI/UX criteria, not a separate
15
+ workflow. Use the general `android` skill for architecture, dependency injection,
16
+ Media3, performance, testing, and other non-UI Android engineering.
17
+
18
+ ## Intake and boundaries
19
+
20
+ Identify the user goal, phone surface, affected interaction, supported Android
21
+ versions, and observable outcomes. Inspect the existing Compose components,
22
+ design tokens, navigation conventions, installed versions, tests, previews, and
23
+ available emulator or device tooling before proposing changes.
24
+
25
+ Preserve the established product visual system, including its components, color,
26
+ type, shape, spacing, and motion tokens. Material 3 is advisory guidance, not a
27
+ mandate to replace a deliberate product language. Suggest Material 3 changes with
28
+ their accessibility or usability benefit and wait for scope approval when they
29
+ would alter the visual direction.
30
+
31
+ The initial scope is phones. Do not invent tablet, foldable, desktop, or wearable
32
+ layouts. Still account for phone portrait and landscape orientation, window size
33
+ changes, display cutouts, system bars, and the soft keyboard or IME.
34
+
35
+ ## Design mode
36
+
37
+ Turn the request into a small interaction contract before implementation:
38
+
39
+ - Define hierarchy, content, spacing, phone layout, scroll and overflow behavior,
40
+ navigation, focus entry and return, gestures, and predictive back behavior.
41
+ - Specify applicable default, pressed, focused, disabled, pending or loading,
42
+ empty, success, error or failure, and offline states. State what changes and
43
+ what the user can do next; never imply success before it is known.
44
+ - Name the state owner. Prefer state hoisting, a single source of truth, and
45
+ unidirectional data flow (UDF); keep transient visual state local only when no
46
+ external owner needs to observe or control it.
47
+ - Design edge-to-edge intentionally with WindowInsets and system bars. Define IME
48
+ resize, pan, focus, dismissal, and restoration behavior for editable surfaces.
49
+ - Require at least 48dp touch targets, meaningful semantics, TalkBack labels and
50
+ actions, logical traversal or focus order, sufficient contrast, and usable font
51
+ scaling without clipped or hidden actions.
52
+ - Add motion only when it has a purpose such as continuity, spatial orientation,
53
+ feedback, or state change. Define start/end state, interruption, cancellation
54
+ or reversal, repeated or rapid input, and reduced-motion or reduced-animation
55
+ behavior that preserves essential information.
56
+
57
+ Use existing components and platform/Compose primitives before adding code or a
58
+ dependency. When alternatives are requested, compare only scoped options and make
59
+ the product-system and Material 3 tradeoffs explicit.
60
+
61
+ ## Implementation mode
62
+
63
+ Implement the accepted contract without expanding the visual language. Keep
64
+ composables focused, pass immutable UI state and event callbacks, and preserve
65
+ unidirectional data flow. Hoist state to the lowest common owner that needs to
66
+ read or write it. Do not duplicate navigation, loading, or failure truth across
67
+ the composition.
68
+
69
+ Prefer semantic Material/Compose controls over raw pointer input. When a custom
70
+ gesture is necessary, preserve accessible actions, minimum touch targets, visual
71
+ feedback, cancellation, and interoperability with scrolling. Consume insets once
72
+ at the correct boundary and verify that edge-to-edge content and IME transitions
73
+ do not obscure controls.
74
+
75
+ Write tests for observable behavior and state outcomes rather than modifier or
76
+ implementation details. Cover the relevant state transition, duplicate or rapid
77
+ input, disabled behavior, semantics, navigation/back behavior, and state
78
+ restoration. Use previews as design aids, not as proof of runtime interaction.
79
+
80
+ ## Review mode
81
+
82
+ Review the agreed surface against the interaction contract and existing Review
83
+ Report rules. Each finding needs a location, reproduction or evidence, user
84
+ impact, and proposed resolution. Treat contract and accessibility failures as
85
+ defects; classify unsupported aesthetic preferences as suggestions. Do not create
86
+ a new review axis or elevate a Material 3 preference over the product system.
87
+
88
+ Check state completeness, TalkBack semantics and traversal, 48dp touch targets,
89
+ contrast and font scaling, focus/IME behavior, edge-to-edge insets, gestures,
90
+ predictive back, orientation changes, state ownership/UDF, motion interruption,
91
+ reduced animation, and rapid repeated interaction as applicable.
92
+
93
+ ## Audit mode
94
+
95
+ A requested audit is read-only. Inspect only the agreed Compose phone surface and
96
+ report prioritized, evidence-backed findings; an audit is not permission to edit,
97
+ implement, modify, or automatically fix the UI. Keep out-of-scope improvements as
98
+ suggestions and create backlog work only when requested through the existing
99
+ workflow.
100
+
101
+ Distinguish code inspection, semantics tests, screenshots, and live emulator or
102
+ device interaction because they prove different things. If required visual,
103
+ emulator, or device evidence is unavailable, mark that validation pending with
104
+ the surface, steps, expected result, and limitation. Do not claim visual
105
+ validation or a completed acceptance criterion without executing the check.
106
+
107
+ ## Evidence and delivery
108
+
109
+ Report the observable outcomes checked, commands or tools used, results, and
110
+ limitations. A screenshot cannot prove TalkBack traversal, gesture interruption,
111
+ IME recovery, predictive back, or repeated-input behavior. Prefer a real phone or
112
+ phone emulator for those checks; otherwise leave precise pending verification.
113
+
114
+ Primary Android references: [Compose semantics](https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/accessibility/semantics),
115
+ [accessibility defaults](https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/accessibility/api-defaults),
116
+ [state and hoisting](https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/state),
117
+ [window insets](https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/system/insets),
118
+ [predictive back](https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/system/predictive-back),
119
+ and [Compose accessibility testing](https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/accessibility/testing).
@@ -42,6 +42,26 @@ Status machine: `TODO` → `READY` → `PLANNED` → `IN_PROGRESS` → `REVIEW`
42
42
  → Archive. `BLOCKED` returns to `READY`. Reviewer rejection: `REVIEW` →
43
43
  `IN_PROGRESS`.
44
44
 
45
+ ## Web interface scope
46
+
47
+ When the task concerns web layout, component states, feedback, motion, or a
48
+ requested UI audit, apply skill `web-design-engineering` from the installed skill
49
+ library. Use it during intake/discovery, design, test/implement, and review as
50
+ applicable; keep this workflow’s gates and TDD order. Framework presence alone
51
+ does not activate it; backend-only and native mobile work are excluded. Record
52
+ required visual checks as pending when unavailable. Keep findings in the existing
53
+ Review Report: contract failures in Spec Axis, technical issues in existing
54
+ subchecks, and aesthetic preferences as suggestions; do not add an axis.
55
+
56
+ ## Android phone interface scope
57
+
58
+ When an item concerns concrete Jetpack Compose phone layout, component states,
59
+ interaction, accessibility, visual behavior, or a requested UI audit, apply skill
60
+ `android-ui-design` throughout discover, design, test/implement, and review. Keep
61
+ OpenSpec gates and TDD order. Kotlin, Compose, framework, or dependency presence
62
+ alone does not activate it; non-UI Android work stays with `android`. Keep audit-only
63
+ delivery read-only and record unavailable visual or emulator evidence as pending.
64
+
45
65
  ## Common Rationalizations
46
66
 
47
67
  | Rationalization | Reality |
@@ -31,6 +31,27 @@ a parallel process.
31
31
  Then run the matching CLI (`openspec validate`, `scorecard create --from-diff`,
32
32
  `hook pre-tool`, `scorecard suite-run`).
33
33
 
34
+ ## Web interface scope
35
+
36
+ When the task concerns web layout, component states, feedback, motion, or a
37
+ requested UI audit, apply skill `web-design-engineering` from the installed skill
38
+ library. Use it during intake/discovery, design, test/implement, and review as
39
+ applicable; keep this workflow’s gates and TDD order. Framework presence alone
40
+ does not activate it; backend-only and native mobile work are excluded. Record
41
+ required visual checks as pending when unavailable. Keep findings in the existing
42
+ Review Report: contract failures in Spec Axis, technical issues in existing
43
+ subchecks, and aesthetic preferences as suggestions; do not add an axis.
44
+
45
+ ## Android phone interface scope
46
+
47
+ When the task concerns concrete Jetpack Compose phone layout, component states,
48
+ interaction, accessibility, visual behavior, or a requested UI audit, apply skill
49
+ `android-ui-design`. Use it during design, test/implementation, and review as
50
+ applicable while preserving the current workflow gates. Kotlin, Compose, framework,
51
+ or dependency presence alone does not activate it; non-UI Android work stays with
52
+ the general `android` skill. Audit-only requests remain read-only, and unavailable
53
+ visual or emulator checks remain pending rather than claimed as complete.
54
+
34
55
  ## Common Rationalizations
35
56
 
36
57
  | Rationalization | Reality |
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: web-design-engineering
3
+ description: >-
4
+ Design, implement, and review web interface layout, component states, feedback,
5
+ and motion within the current CodeConductor workflow. Use for concrete web UI
6
+ work or requested UI audits, not backend-only tasks or native mobile apps.
7
+ ---
8
+
9
+ # Web design engineering
10
+
11
+ Apply this guidance to the web surface in scope. A React or Tailwind dependency
12
+ alone is not a trigger. Keep the existing feature, fix, review, or OpenSpec flow;
13
+ this skill adds contextual criteria, not commands, agents, gates, or score weights.
14
+
15
+ ## Intake and discovery
16
+
17
+ Translate vague requests into observable behavior: “responsive feedback” might
18
+ mean showing a pending state immediately after submit while preventing duplicate
19
+ submissions. Identify the user objective, affected surface, relevant states, and
20
+ acceptance checks in the Task Card. Ask only about ambiguities that affect scope.
21
+
22
+ Inspect existing components, design tokens, documented visual decisions, installed
23
+ dependencies and versions, and available browser, component-preview, and test tools.
24
+ Reuse the product's visual language and accessible components. Consult official
25
+ documentation for the installed version when an API is uncertain. Prefer existing
26
+ capabilities and browser primitives; a small transition does not justify a library.
27
+
28
+ ## Design and implementation
29
+
30
+ Record relevant decisions in the Technical Plan or OpenSpec design.md:
31
+
32
+ - For static UI: hierarchy, readable content, spacing, responsive layout, overflow,
33
+ semantics, contrast, and focus visibility. Do not invent motion to fill a checklist.
34
+ - For interactive components: default, pending, success, failure, disabled, and
35
+ empty states as applicable; pointer, touch, keyboard, focus entry and return.
36
+ Acknowledge input promptly without implying success before it is known.
37
+ - If motion serves the task, name its purpose and weigh frequency, waiting cost,
38
+ and context. Specify start/end states, exit, rapid repeated input, cancellation
39
+ or reversal, and reduced-motion behavior that preserves essential information.
40
+ Use continuity or direct manipulation when it helps users understand the action.
41
+ - Reuse motion tokens. Choose properties and tools appropriate to the component;
42
+ inspect layout/paint cost when relevant instead of assuming smoothness from code.
43
+ No duration, easing curve, animation technique, or visual style is universally
44
+ forbidden. Explain tradeoffs against the contract and product conventions.
45
+ - When alternatives are explicitly requested, compare scoped options and their
46
+ tradeoffs before choosing. Do not build a variant selector or prototype framework.
47
+
48
+ Agree checks before implementation. Preserve the workflow's test-before-implement
49
+ order and use its evidence mechanism when required. Test observable state changes
50
+ and interaction outcomes, not just CSS strings. Implement only the accepted scope.
51
+ Tailwind skills own responsive conventions; framework skills own implementation;
52
+ PageSpeed owns performance measurement; evaluation owns the scorecard.
53
+
54
+ ## Review and delivery
55
+
56
+ Use the existing Review Report and its severity/verdict rules. Map contract failures
57
+ to Spec Axis and technical issues to existing subchecks such as Correctness,
58
+ Architecture alignment, Performance, or Test coverage. Preserve Standards Axis;
59
+ do not add a design axis or rerank the two axes. Ground each finding in a location,
60
+ reproduction or evidence, user impact, and a proposed resolution. Aesthetic
61
+ preferences alone are suggestions, not blocking defects. Respect documented
62
+ product choices unless evidence demonstrates a contract or technical failure.
63
+
64
+ For a requested audit, inspect only the agreed surface and prioritize findings by
65
+ impact and evidence. Report out-of-scope opportunities as suggestions. Create
66
+ backlog items through the existing cc-backlog workflow only when requested; deliver
67
+ those items later through OpenSpec. An audit is not permission to implement fixes.
68
+
69
+ Report checks actually performed, their results, and limitations. Code inspection,
70
+ DOM tests, screenshots, and live interaction checks establish different evidence.
71
+ A screenshot cannot prove interruption or keyboard behavior. If a required visual
72
+ or interaction check cannot run, mark it pending with the surface, steps, expected
73
+ result, and missing tool/environment. Do not claim visual validation from code or
74
+ mark the unmet acceptance criterion complete.
75
+
76
+ ## Example acceptance
77
+
78
+ For a dismissible web dialog using existing tokens: opening from the keyboard
79
+ places focus inside; Escape during entry closes it without reopening on a stale
80
+ completion callback and returns focus to its trigger. With reduced motion enabled,
81
+ the same actions work without the spatial transition. Check rapid open/close in
82
+ the browser and record the result; if unavailable, keep that check pending.
83
+ For a static pricing page, verify content hierarchy and no horizontal overflow at
84
+ the agreed viewports; no animation is required.
85
+
86
+ ## Provenance and boundaries
87
+
88
+ Original CodeConductor adaptation informed by Emil Kowalski's
89
+ [design engineering](https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills/blob/main/skills/emil-design-eng/SKILL.md),
90
+ [animation construction](https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills/blob/main/skills/animate/SKILL.md),
91
+ and [interaction principles](https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills/blob/main/skills/apple-design/SKILL.md).
92
+ Additional references: [review](https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills/blob/main/skills/review-animations/SKILL.md),
93
+ [audits](https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills/blob/main/skills/improve-animations/SKILL.md),
94
+ [opportunities](https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills/blob/main/skills/find-animation-opportunities/SKILL.md),
95
+ [vocabulary](https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills/blob/main/skills/animation-vocabulary/SKILL.md),
96
+ [library selection](https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills/blob/main/skills/pick-ui-library/SKILL.md),
97
+ [component guidance](https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills/blob/main/skills/ask-sonner/SKILL.md),
98
+ and [alternatives](https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills/blob/main/skills/prototype/SKILL.md).
99
+ These are provenance, not runtime prerequisites. This skill does not install or
100
+ synchronize upstream skills, adopt promotional responses or mandatory author
101
+ formats, prescribe an Apple identity, or cover Expo/Swift native development.
@@ -56,9 +56,13 @@ skills:
56
56
  targets: [claude, codex, cursor, opencode, agy]
57
57
  - name: workflow-orchestration-patterns
58
58
  targets: [claude, codex, cursor, opencode]
59
+ - name: android-ui-design
60
+ targets: [claude, codex, cursor, opencode, agy]
59
61
  - name: code-review
60
62
  targets: [cursor, opencode]
61
63
  - name: seo-analytics-injector
62
64
  targets: [cursor, opencode]
63
65
  - name: tdd-mutation-tester
64
66
  targets: [cursor, opencode]
67
+ - name: web-design-engineering
68
+ targets: [claude, codex, cursor, opencode, agy]