cbrowser 18.35.0 → 18.37.0

package/dist/personas.js

@@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ export function createCognitivePersona(name, description, traits, options = {})
         fearOfMissingOut: traits.fearOfMissingOut ?? basePersona.cognitiveTraits?.fearOfMissingOut ?? 0.5,
         socialProofSensitivity: traits.socialProofSensitivity ?? basePersona.cognitiveTraits?.socialProofSensitivity ?? 0.5,
         mentalModelRigidity: traits.mentalModelRigidity ?? basePersona.cognitiveTraits?.mentalModelRigidity ?? 0.5,
+        siteFamiliarity: traits.siteFamiliarity ?? basePersona.cognitiveTraits?.siteFamiliarity ?? 0.5,
     };
     // Update demographics if provided
     if (options.techLevel) {
@@ -792,6 +793,7 @@ export function getCognitiveProfile(persona) {
         fearOfMissingOut: 0.5,
         socialProofSensitivity: 0.5,
         mentalModelRigidity: 0.5,
+        siteFamiliarity: 0.5,
     };
     return {
         traits: traits ? { ...defaultTraits, ...traits } : defaultTraits,
@@ -872,6 +874,7 @@ export const BUILTIN_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.2, // Low - not swayed by urgency
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.3, // Low - evaluates on merits
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.8, // High - adapts to new patterns
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.9, // Very high - daily user, knows everything
         },
         context: {
             viewport: [1920, 1080],
@@ -951,6 +954,7 @@ export const BUILTIN_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.6, // Medium-high - susceptible to urgency
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.8, // High - relies heavily on reviews
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.3, // Low - struggles when patterns break
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.0, // Zero - brand new, never visited before
         },
         context: {
             viewport: [1280, 800],
@@ -1024,6 +1028,7 @@ export const BUILTIN_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.7, // High - push notifications, urgency
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.6, // Medium-high - app store ratings
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.6, // Medium - adapts to mobile patterns
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.4, // Low-medium - used desktop version before
         },
         context: {
             viewport: [375, 812], // iPhone X dimensions
@@ -1097,6 +1102,7 @@ export const BUILTIN_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.2, // Low - methodical, not impulsive
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.5, // Medium - reviews are accessible info
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.6, // Medium - adapts but needs time
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.3, // Low - has visited but forgets layout
         },
         context: {
             viewport: [1280, 800],
@@ -1170,6 +1176,7 @@ export const BUILTIN_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.3, // Low - not driven by urgency, confused by it
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.7, // High - relies on grandchildren's recommendations
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.2, // Very low - rigid, struggles with novel UIs
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.5, // Medium - knows the basics
         },
         context: {
             viewport: [1280, 800],
@@ -1249,6 +1256,7 @@ export const BUILTIN_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.9, // Very high - urgency works on them
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.5, // Medium - if it's quick to evaluate
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.7, // High - adapts quickly, expects conventions
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.2, // Low - site structure feels different each visit
         },
         context: {
             viewport: [1280, 800],
@@ -1382,6 +1390,7 @@ export const ACCESSIBILITY_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.3, // Not swayed, focused on completing
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.5,
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.5,
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.5, // Medium - regular user with motor challenges
         },
     },
     "low-vision-magnified": {
@@ -1471,6 +1480,7 @@ export const ACCESSIBILITY_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.3, // Not swayed - focused
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.5,
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.4, // Adapts but needs time
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.3, // Low - magnification makes layout unfamiliar
         },
     },
     "cognitive-adhd": {
@@ -1551,6 +1561,7 @@ export const ACCESSIBILITY_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.85, // Very high - ADHD correlates with FOMO
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.5, // Medium - if interesting
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.7, // High - adapts easily, novelty-seeking
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.3, // Low - doesn't retain site structure well
         },
     },
     "dyslexic-user": {
@@ -1631,6 +1642,7 @@ export const ACCESSIBILITY_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.5,
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.6, // Relies on visual reviews
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.6, // Good adaptation
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.5, // Medium - knows sites but reading is hard
         },
     },
     "deaf-user": {
@@ -1709,6 +1721,7 @@ export const ACCESSIBILITY_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.4,
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.6, // Visual reviews/ratings
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.65, // Good visual adaptation
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.5, // Medium - visual learner, remembers layout
         },
     },
     "elderly-low-vision": {
@@ -1795,6 +1808,7 @@ export const ACCESSIBILITY_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.25, // Low - not driven by urgency
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.7, // High - relies on family advice
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.15, // Very low - rigid, struggles
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.2, // Low - forgets between visits
         },
     },
     "color-blind-deuteranopia": {
@@ -1876,6 +1890,357 @@ export const ACCESSIBILITY_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.4,
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.5,
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.65, // Adapts with workarounds
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.6, // Medium-high - functional user
+        },
+    },
+    // =========================================================================
+    // v18.35.0: Research-backed cognitive disability personas
+    // =========================================================================
+    "autism-spectrum": {
+        name: "autism-spectrum",
+        // Research: Yaneva et al. (2018, Behaviour & Information Technology) — eye tracking shows
+        // autistic users produce more scattered scanpaths, fixate on more elements, make more
+        // transitions between areas. Visual complexity and low element distinguishability cause
+        // disproportionate difficulty. Yaneva et al. (2020, W4A) confirmed with Scanpath Trend Analysis.
+        // AASPIRE guidelines (Raymaker/Nicolaidis 2019) validated with 170 autistic adults.
+        //
+        // SPECTRUM NOTE: This persona models a high-functioning autistic adult. Findings should NOT
+        // be generalized to the full spectrum. Sensory sensitivity profiles vary enormously. Many
+        // autistic users are power users who need predictability and consistency, not simplification.
+        description: "Autistic adult user — needs predictable layouts, clear labels, reduced visual noise. Based on Yaneva et al. eye tracking research.",
+        demographics: {
+            age_range: "18-45",
+            tech_level: "intermediate",
+            device: "desktop",
+        },
+        behaviors: {
+            needs_predictable_layout: true,
+            sensitive_to_visual_clutter: true,
+            literal_interpretation: true,
+            prefers_explicit_labels: true,
+        },
+        humanBehavior: {
+            timing: {
+                reactionTime: { min: 400, max: 1200 },
+                clickDelay: { min: 300, max: 900 },
+                typeSpeed: { min: 80, max: 180 },
+                readingSpeed: 180,
+                scrollPauseTime: { min: 400, max: 1200 },
+            },
+            errors: {
+                misClickRate: 0.12,
+                doubleClickAccidental: 0.05,
+                typoRate: 0.06,
+                backtrackRate: 0.25, // Higher - revisits elements more often
+            },
+            mouse: {
+                curvature: 0.4,
+                jitter: 5,
+                overshoot: 0.1,
+                speed: "normal",
+            },
+            attention: {
+                pattern: "thorough", // Examines many elements, not just CTAs
+                scrollBehavior: "chunked",
+                focusAreas: ["header", "text", "images"], // Scans broadly
+                distractionRate: 0.45, // Higher - fixates on task-irrelevant elements (Yaneva 2018)
+            },
+        },
+        context: {
+            viewport: [1920, 1080],
+        },
+        accessibilityTraits: {
+            processingSpeed: 0.55, // Slightly slower on complex layouts
+            attentionSpan: 0.6, // Can sustain focus on predictable tasks
+            fatigueSusceptibility: 0.5, // Moderate - sensory overload increases fatigue
+        },
+        cognitiveTraits: {
+            workingMemory: 0.6, // Often good - detail-oriented (Happé & Frith 2006)
+            patience: 0.65, // Moderate-high - persistent on structured tasks
+            persistence: 0.7, // High on predictable tasks, drops on chaotic ones
+            curiosity: 0.4, // Lower - prefers known patterns over exploration
+            riskTolerance: 0.2, // Very low - avoids unfamiliar/ambiguous UI elements
+            readingTendency: 0.7, // Reads labels carefully, literal interpretation
+            comprehension: 0.55, // Good with clear labels, struggles with ambiguous ones
+            resilience: 0.4, // Sensory overload erodes recovery (BRS)
+            selfEfficacy: 0.55, // Moderate - confident on familiar interfaces
+            satisficing: 0.3, // Low - seeks completeness, not "good enough"
+            trustCalibration: 0.3, // Low - skeptical of vague claims, needs explicit info
+            interruptRecovery: 0.3, // Low - context-switching is costly
+            informationForaging: 0.35, // Low - systematic not scent-following
+            changeBlindness: 0.3, // Low - actually notices MORE changes than typical (detail focus)
+            anchoringBias: 0.75, // High - strong anchoring to first interpretation
+            timeHorizon: 0.5, // Medium - task-dependent
+            attributionStyle: 0.5, // Medium - depends on interface clarity
+            metacognitivePlanning: 0.55, // Moderate - systematic when structure is clear
+            proceduralFluency: 0.6, // Good on consistent multi-step flows
+            transferLearning: 0.35, // Low - each new interface pattern requires relearning
+            authoritySensitivity: 0.4, // Low - evaluates logically, not by authority cues
+            emotionalContagion: 0.3, // Low - less influenced by emotional UI tone
+            fearOfMissingOut: 0.2, // Low - not driven by social urgency
+            socialProofSensitivity: 0.25, // Low - evaluates independently
+            mentalModelRigidity: 0.2, // Very low (rigid) - needs consistent patterns
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.4, // Low-medium - remembers structure but needs consistency
+        },
+    },
+    "intellectual-disability": {
+        name: "intellectual-disability",
+        // Research: Karreman, van der Geest & Buursink (2007, J Applied Research in ID) — users
+        // completed tasks with accessible content but not standard content. Images, familiar words,
+        // and larger fonts measurably improved comprehension. Rocha et al. (2015, PMC4467236) —
+        // task complexity is the key variable: simple browsing succeeds, form filling struggles,
+        // financial transactions often fail. W3C COGA User Research module on Down Syndrome.
+        //
+        // SPECTRUM NOTE: Models mild-to-moderate intellectual disability. Most web usability research
+        // studied this range. Visual memory can be above average even when judgment is impaired.
+        // Do NOT assume users cannot learn — they can, with consistent, simple interfaces.
+        description: "User with mild intellectual disability — needs simple navigation, plain language, image support. Based on Karreman et al. and W3C COGA research.",
+        demographics: {
+            age_range: "18-55",
+            tech_level: "beginner",
+            device: "desktop",
+        },
+        behaviors: {
+            needs_simple_language: true,
+            needs_image_support: true,
+            repeated_clicking: true,
+            perceives_loading_as_error: true,
+        },
+        humanBehavior: {
+            timing: {
+                reactionTime: { min: 800, max: 2500 },
+                clickDelay: { min: 500, max: 1500 },
+                typeSpeed: { min: 200, max: 500 },
+                readingSpeed: 80, // Significantly slower
+                scrollPauseTime: { min: 800, max: 2000 },
+            },
+            errors: {
+                misClickRate: 0.2,
+                doubleClickAccidental: 0.15, // Repeated clicking is documented
+                typoRate: 0.2,
+                backtrackRate: 0.35,
+            },
+            mouse: {
+                curvature: 0.7,
+                jitter: 10,
+                overshoot: 0.2,
+                speed: "slow",
+            },
+            attention: {
+                pattern: "f-pattern",
+                scrollBehavior: "chunked",
+                focusAreas: ["images", "header", "cta"],
+                distractionRate: 0.4,
+            },
+        },
+        context: {
+            viewport: [1280, 800],
+        },
+        accessibilityTraits: {
+            processingSpeed: 0.3, // Slow - measurably longer task times
+            attentionSpan: 0.4, // Moderate - sustained on simple tasks
+            fatigueSusceptibility: 0.7, // High - complexity causes rapid fatigue
+        },
+        cognitiveTraits: {
+            workingMemory: 0.2, // Low - limited capacity
+            patience: 0.5, // Medium - willing to try but confused
+            persistence: 0.4, // Medium - retries but gives up on complexity
+            curiosity: 0.3, // Low - prefers familiar paths
+            riskTolerance: 0.2, // Very low - sticks to obvious elements
+            readingTendency: 0.3, // Low - relies on images and icons
+            comprehension: 0.2, // Low - needs plain language
+            resilience: 0.35, // Low - errors are discouraging (BRS)
+            selfEfficacy: 0.3, // Low - often blames self for failures
+            satisficing: 0.8, // High - takes first option that seems right
+            trustCalibration: 0.7, // High - trusts official-looking content readily
+            interruptRecovery: 0.15, // Very low - loses place completely
+            informationForaging: 0.15, // Very low - no systematic search strategy
+            changeBlindness: 0.8, // Very high - misses subtle changes
+            anchoringBias: 0.85, // Very high - first interpretation persists
+            timeHorizon: 0.6, // Medium - patient when not frustrated
+            attributionStyle: 0.8, // High - self-blaming ("I'm stupid")
+            metacognitivePlanning: 0.1, // Very low - trial and error only
+            proceduralFluency: 0.2, // Very low - multi-step flows are very hard
+            transferLearning: 0.15, // Very low - each interface is new
+            authoritySensitivity: 0.9, // Very high - defers to official cues
+            emotionalContagion: 0.7, // High - influenced by UI emotional tone
+            fearOfMissingOut: 0.3, // Low - not driven by urgency
+            socialProofSensitivity: 0.6, // Medium - influenced by social cues
+            mentalModelRigidity: 0.1, // Extremely rigid - needs consistency
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.15, // Very low - limited retention between visits
+        },
+    },
+    "aphasia-receptive": {
+        name: "aphasia-receptive",
+        // Research: W3C COGA Aphasia research module — language-dependent navigation creates
+        // barriers. Single-proposition sentences with keyword emphasis improve performance.
+        // Brandenburg et al. (PMC12336571) — bridging digital divide. Roper — usability testing
+        // from aphasia perspective showed many participants could not accomplish text-heavy tasks.
+        //
+        // SPECTRUM NOTE: This models RECEPTIVE (Wernicke's) aphasia — difficulty understanding
+        // language. Expressive aphasia (Broca's) has different barriers (text input, not comprehension).
+        // Aphasia does NOT imply intellectual impairment — reasoning and judgment are intact.
+        description: "User with receptive aphasia — struggles with text-heavy navigation, needs visual cues and simple sentences. Language comprehension is impaired, intelligence is not.",
+        demographics: {
+            age_range: "35-75",
+            tech_level: "intermediate",
+            device: "desktop",
+        },
+        behaviors: {
+            struggles_with_text_menus: true,
+            relies_on_icons: true,
+            needs_short_sentences: true,
+            avoids_text_heavy_pages: true,
+        },
+        humanBehavior: {
+            timing: {
+                reactionTime: { min: 600, max: 2000 },
+                clickDelay: { min: 400, max: 1200 },
+                typeSpeed: { min: 300, max: 800 }, // Text input very difficult
+                readingSpeed: 60, // Severely impaired language processing
+                scrollPauseTime: { min: 600, max: 1500 },
+            },
+            errors: {
+                misClickRate: 0.15,
+                doubleClickAccidental: 0.08,
+                typoRate: 0.3, // Word-finding difficulties affect typing
+                backtrackRate: 0.4, // High - misunderstands navigation labels
+            },
+            mouse: {
+                curvature: 0.5,
+                jitter: 6,
+                overshoot: 0.12,
+                speed: "normal",
+            },
+            attention: {
+                pattern: "skim", // Scans for visual cues, not text
+                scrollBehavior: "chunked",
+                focusAreas: ["images", "cta", "header"], // Visual over textual
+                distractionRate: 0.3,
+            },
+        },
+        context: {
+            viewport: [1920, 1080],
+        },
+        accessibilityTraits: {
+            processingSpeed: 0.35, // Low for language tasks, normal for visual
+            attentionSpan: 0.6, // Normal attention, impaired comprehension
+            fatigueSusceptibility: 0.6, // Language processing is exhausting
+        },
+        cognitiveTraits: {
+            workingMemory: 0.45, // Moderate - verbal WM impaired, visual intact
+            patience: 0.55, // Medium - used to difficulty, somewhat persistent
+            persistence: 0.5, // Medium - tries but abandons text-heavy tasks
+            curiosity: 0.3, // Low - new text-heavy pages are daunting
+            riskTolerance: 0.25, // Low - unsure what labels mean
+            readingTendency: 0.15, // Very low - avoids reading, seeks visual cues
+            comprehension: 0.25, // Low for text, normal for visual/spatial layouts
+            resilience: 0.45, // Medium - accustomed to communication barriers
+            selfEfficacy: 0.4, // Low-medium - knows they can think, frustrated by language
+            satisficing: 0.7, // High - takes first visual match
+            trustCalibration: 0.5, // Medium - can't evaluate text-based trust signals
+            interruptRecovery: 0.3, // Low - re-reading to recover context is very hard
+            informationForaging: 0.2, // Very low - can't follow text scent
+            changeBlindness: 0.5, // Medium - notices visual changes, misses text changes
+            anchoringBias: 0.7, // High - sticks to first visual interpretation
+            timeHorizon: 0.5, // Medium
+            attributionStyle: 0.4, // Low-medium - knows it's a language issue, not stupidity
+            metacognitivePlanning: 0.5, // Medium - reasoning is intact, planning is possible
+            proceduralFluency: 0.4, // Low-medium - multi-step with text instructions is hard
+            transferLearning: 0.4, // Low-medium - visual patterns transfer, text patterns don't
+            authoritySensitivity: 0.5,
+            emotionalContagion: 0.5,
+            fearOfMissingOut: 0.3,
+            socialProofSensitivity: 0.4,
+            mentalModelRigidity: 0.4, // Medium - adapts visually, not linguistically
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.25, // Low - text-based nav makes sites feel unfamiliar each visit
+        },
+    },
+    "dyscalculia": {
+        name: "dyscalculia",
+        // Research: W3C COGA dyscalculia research module — difficulty with numbers, percentages,
+        // reference numbers, quantities. UK Government Design System (2022) — redesigning numerical
+        // presentation "doubled the number of customers who understood" bills/statements.
+        // UK Accessibility Blog (2025) — specific design patterns for dyscalculia.
+        // Estimated 3-7% of population (Butterworth 2005, Science).
+        //
+        // SPECTRUM NOTE: Dyscalculia affects numerical processing specifically. General reasoning,
+        // language, and spatial skills are typically normal or above. Users may be highly skilled
+        // with technology except when numbers are involved.
+        description: "User with dyscalculia — struggles with pricing, quantities, dates, percentages, and reference numbers. Non-numerical skills are normal.",
+        demographics: {
+            age_range: "18-55",
+            tech_level: "intermediate",
+            device: "desktop",
+        },
+        behaviors: {
+            struggles_with_pricing: true,
+            confuses_quantities: true,
+            difficulty_with_dates: true,
+            avoids_number_heavy_pages: true,
+        },
+        humanBehavior: {
+            timing: {
+                reactionTime: { min: 350, max: 900 },
+                clickDelay: { min: 200, max: 500 },
+                typeSpeed: { min: 80, max: 160 },
+                readingSpeed: 220, // Normal text reading speed
+                scrollPauseTime: { min: 300, max: 800 },
+            },
+            errors: {
+                misClickRate: 0.08,
+                doubleClickAccidental: 0.03,
+                typoRate: 0.15, // Number entry errors
+                backtrackRate: 0.3, // Re-checks numerical information
+            },
+            mouse: {
+                curvature: 0.4,
+                jitter: 4,
+                overshoot: 0.08,
+                speed: "normal",
+            },
+            attention: {
+                pattern: "skim",
+                scrollBehavior: "continuous",
+                focusAreas: ["text", "prices", "header"],
+                distractionRate: 0.2,
+            },
+        },
+        context: {
+            viewport: [1920, 1080],
+        },
+        accessibilityTraits: {
+            processingSpeed: 0.7, // Normal for non-numerical tasks
+            attentionSpan: 0.7, // Normal attention
+            fatigueSusceptibility: 0.4, // Moderate - number-heavy pages are tiring
+        },
+        cognitiveTraits: {
+            workingMemory: 0.5, // Normal verbal, impaired numerical
+            patience: 0.5, // Medium - frustrated by numbers, fine otherwise
+            persistence: 0.6, // Medium-high - persistent on non-numerical tasks
+            curiosity: 0.6, // Normal - explores freely until numbers appear
+            riskTolerance: 0.4, // Low-medium - cautious with purchases/quantities
+            readingTendency: 0.65, // Medium-high - reads text normally, skips number-heavy sections
+            comprehension: 0.65, // Normal for text, low for numerical content
+            resilience: 0.5, // Medium - used to numerical difficulty
+            selfEfficacy: 0.5, // Medium - confident except with numbers
+            satisficing: 0.6, // Medium - avoids comparing numerical options
+            trustCalibration: 0.5, // Medium - can evaluate text-based trust, not numerical
+            interruptRecovery: 0.6, // Normal
+            informationForaging: 0.55, // Medium - normal except for numerical scent
+            changeBlindness: 0.5, // Normal
+            anchoringBias: 0.6, // Medium - numerical anchoring is especially strong
+            timeHorizon: 0.5, // Medium
+            attributionStyle: 0.5, // Medium - knows it's a specific difficulty
+            metacognitivePlanning: 0.6, // Normal - good planning for non-numerical tasks
+            proceduralFluency: 0.55, // Medium - struggles when steps involve numbers
+            transferLearning: 0.6, // Normal for non-numerical patterns
+            authoritySensitivity: 0.5,
+            emotionalContagion: 0.5,
+            fearOfMissingOut: 0.5,
+            socialProofSensitivity: 0.5,
+            mentalModelRigidity: 0.6, // Medium - adapts well to non-numerical patterns
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.5, // Medium - normal retention
         },
     },
 };
@@ -1977,6 +2342,7 @@ export const EMOTIONAL_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.6, // Medium-high - anxiety about missing out
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.7, // High - seeks validation from others
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.4, // Low-medium - struggles with unexpected
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.5, // Medium
         },
         context: {
             viewport: [1280, 800],
@@ -2054,6 +2420,7 @@ export const EMOTIONAL_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.3, // Low - not swayed by urgency
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.4, // Low-medium - evaluates on merits
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.8, // High - adapts easily
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.5, // Medium
         },
         context: {
             viewport: [1920, 1080],
@@ -2131,6 +2498,7 @@ export const EMOTIONAL_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.75, // High - emotional FOMO
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.7, // High - seeks emotional validation
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.5, // Medium
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.5, // Medium
         },
         context: {
             viewport: [1280, 800],
@@ -2208,6 +2576,7 @@ export const EMOTIONAL_PERSONAS = {
             fearOfMissingOut: 0.1, // Minimum - not driven by urgency
             socialProofSensitivity: 0.3, // Low - evaluates independently
             mentalModelRigidity: 0.7, // High - adapts methodically
+            siteFamiliarity: 0.5, // Medium
         },
         context: {
             viewport: [1280, 800],