bmad-module-skill-forge 0.5.0 → 0.7.0

package/src/workflows/create-stack-skill/validation-report.md

@@ -1,401 +0,0 @@
----
-validationDate: 2026-02-27
-workflowName: create-stack-skill
-workflowPath: _bmad-output/bmb-creations/workflows/create-stack-skill
-validationStatus: COMPLETE
-completionDate: 2026-02-27
----
-
-# Validation Report: create-stack-skill
-
-**Validation Started:** 2026-02-27
-**Validator:** BMAD Workflow Validation System
-**Standards Version:** BMAD Workflow Standards
-
----
-
-## File Structure & Size
-
-### Folder Structure
-
-```
-create-stack-skill/
-├── workflow.md                          ✅
-├── workflow-plan-create-stack-skill.md  (plan artifact)
-├── data/
-│   ├── integration-patterns.md          ✅
-│   ├── manifest-patterns.md             ✅
-│   └── stack-skill-template.md          ✅
-└── steps-c/
-    ├── step-01-init.md                  ✅
-    ├── step-02-detect-manifests.md      ✅
-    ├── step-03-rank-and-confirm.md      ✅
-    ├── step-04-parallel-extract.md      ✅
-    ├── step-05-detect-integrations.md   ✅
-    ├── step-06-compile-stack.md         ✅
-    ├── step-07-generate-output.md       ✅
-    ├── step-08-validate.md              ✅
-    └── step-09-report.md               ✅
-```
-
-- ✅ workflow.md exists
-- ✅ steps-c/ folder with 9 sequential step files
-- ✅ data/ folder with 3 reference files
-- ✅ No templates/ needed (non-document workflow)
-- ✅ No gaps in step numbering (01-09)
-- ✅ Final step (09) exists without nextStepFile
-
-### File Size Analysis
-
-| File | Lines | Status |
-|------|-------|--------|
-| workflow.md | 59 | ✅ Good |
-| step-01-init.md | 143 | ✅ Good |
-| step-02-detect-manifests.md | 145 | ✅ Good |
-| step-03-rank-and-confirm.md | 161 | ✅ Good |
-| step-04-parallel-extract.md | 155 | ✅ Good |
-| step-05-detect-integrations.md | 154 | ✅ Good |
-| step-06-compile-stack.md | 160 | ✅ Good |
-| step-07-generate-output.md | 202 | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-08-validate.md | 193 | ✅ Good |
-| step-09-report.md | 137 | ✅ Good |
-| data/integration-patterns.md | 61 | ✅ Good |
-| data/manifest-patterns.md | 35 | ✅ Good |
-| data/stack-skill-template.md | 110 | ✅ Good |
-
-**Size Summary:** 12/13 files under 200 lines. 1 file (step-07) at 202 lines — approaching limit but under 250 max.
-
-**Status: ✅ PASS (1 advisory)**
-
----
-
-## Frontmatter Validation
-
-### Per-File Analysis
-
-| File | Variables | Used | Unused | Paths | Status |
-|------|-----------|------|--------|-------|--------|
-| step-01-init.md | nextStepFile, forgeTierFile, skfConfigFile | 2 | 1 | ✅ | ❌ FAIL |
-| step-02-detect-manifests.md | nextStepFile, manifestPatterns | 2 | 0 | ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-03-rank-and-confirm.md | nextStepFile | 1 | 0 | ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-04-parallel-extract.md | nextStepFile | 1 | 0 | ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-05-detect-integrations.md | nextStepFile, integrationPatterns | 2 | 0 | ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-06-compile-stack.md | nextStepFile, stackSkillTemplate | 2 | 0 | ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-07-generate-output.md | nextStepFile, stackSkillTemplate | 2 | 0 | ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-08-validate.md | nextStepFile, stackSkillTemplate | 2 | 0 | ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-09-report.md | (none) | 0 | 0 | ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-
-### Violations
-
-**step-01-init.md:**
-- ❌ `skfConfigFile: '{project-root}/_bmad/skf/config.yaml'` — defined in frontmatter but `{skfConfigFile}` is NOT referenced in the step body. The SKF config is loaded in workflow.md initialization sequence, not in step-01. **Remove this variable from step-01 frontmatter.**
-
-### Path Format Check
-
-- All step-to-step paths use `./step-XX-name.md` format ✅
-- All data references use `../data/filename.md` format ✅
-- Config variable paths use `{variable}/path` format ✅
-- No `{workflow_path}` forbidden pattern found ✅
-
-**Status: ⚠️ FAIL (1 unused variable)**
-
----
-
-## Critical Path Violations
-
-### Config Variables (Exceptions)
-
-From workflow.md Configuration Loading section:
-- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `user_name`, `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `skills_output_folder`, `forge_data_folder`, `sidecar_path`
-
-### Content Path Violations
-
-No hardcoded `{project-root}/` paths found in step file body content. The only `{project-root}` reference in steps-c/ is in step-01-init.md frontmatter (line 7: `skfConfigFile`), which is a frontmatter issue, not a content violation.
-
-### Dead Links
-
-All file references verified:
-
-| Source | Variable | Target | Exists |
-|--------|----------|--------|--------|
-| step-01 | nextStepFile | ./step-02-detect-manifests.md | ✅ |
-| step-02 | nextStepFile | ./step-03-rank-and-confirm.md | ✅ |
-| step-02 | manifestPatterns | ../data/manifest-patterns.md | ✅ |
-| step-03 | nextStepFile | ./step-04-parallel-extract.md | ✅ |
-| step-04 | nextStepFile | ./step-05-detect-integrations.md | ✅ |
-| step-05 | nextStepFile | ./step-06-compile-stack.md | ✅ |
-| step-05 | integrationPatterns | ../data/integration-patterns.md | ✅ |
-| step-06 | nextStepFile | ./step-07-generate-output.md | ✅ |
-| step-06 | stackSkillTemplate | ../data/stack-skill-template.md | ✅ |
-| step-07 | nextStepFile | ./step-08-validate.md | ✅ |
-| step-07 | stackSkillTemplate | ../data/stack-skill-template.md | ✅ |
-| step-08 | nextStepFile | ./step-09-report.md | ✅ |
-| step-08 | stackSkillTemplate | ../data/stack-skill-template.md | ✅ |
-
-### Module Awareness
-
-This is an SKF module workflow. No BMB-specific path assumptions found.
-
-**Status: ✅ PASS**
-
----
-
-## Menu Handling Validation
-
-| Step | Menu Type | Handler | Execution Rules | A/P Check | Status |
-|------|-----------|---------|-----------------|-----------|--------|
-| step-01 | None (auto-proceed) | N/A | N/A | No A/P ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-02 | None (auto-proceed) | N/A | N/A | No A/P ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-03 | P2 C-only (Gate 1) | ✅ Present | ✅ "halt and wait" | No A/P ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-04 | None (auto-proceed) | N/A | N/A | No A/P ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-05 | None (auto-proceed) | N/A | N/A | No A/P ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-06 | P2 C-only (Gate 2) | ✅ Present | ✅ "halt and wait" | No A/P ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-07 | None (auto-proceed) | N/A | N/A | No A/P ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-08 | None (auto-proceed) | N/A | N/A | No A/P ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-| step-09 | None (Final) | N/A | N/A | No A/P ✅ | ✅ PASS |
-
-**Details for menu steps:**
-- step-03: Handler follows display, non-C inputs redisplay menu, C saves and loads next step ✅
-- step-06: Handler follows display, non-C inputs process feedback and redisplay, C saves and loads next step ✅
-
-**No inappropriate A/P usage** — correct for prescriptive pipeline workflow.
-
-**Status: ✅ PASS**
-
----
-
-## Step Type Validation
-
-| Step | Expected Type | Actual Type | Pattern Match | Status |
-|------|---------------|-------------|---------------|--------|
-| step-01 | Init Non-Continuable | Init Non-Continuable | ✅ No A/P, auto-proceed, no continuation | ✅ PASS |
-| step-02 | Middle Simple | Middle Simple | ✅ Auto-proceed, no A/P | ✅ PASS |
-| step-03 | Middle Simple (P2) | Middle Simple (P2) | ✅ C-only menu, no A/P | ✅ PASS |
-| step-04 | Middle Simple | Middle Simple | ✅ Auto-proceed, no A/P | ✅ PASS |
-| step-05 | Middle Simple | Middle Simple | ✅ Auto-proceed, no A/P | ✅ PASS |
-| step-06 | Middle Simple (P2) | Middle Simple (P2) | ✅ C-only menu, no A/P | ✅ PASS |
-| step-07 | Middle Simple | Middle Simple | ✅ Auto-proceed, no A/P | ✅ PASS |
-| step-08 | Middle Simple | Middle Simple | ✅ Auto-proceed, no A/P | ✅ PASS |
-| step-09 | Final | Final | ✅ No nextStepFile, completion message | ✅ PASS |
-
-**All 9 steps match their designated type patterns.**
-
-**Status: ✅ PASS**
-
----
-
-## Output Format Validation
-
-**Workflow Type:** Non-document (action-based, multi-file generation)
-
-This workflow does NOT produce a single document output. It generates multiple files (SKILL.md, context-snippet.md, metadata.json, reference files) via file I/O operations in step-07.
-
-- No template file needed ✅
-- No final polish step needed ✅
-- No step-to-output mapping required ✅
-- File writing handled in step-07 with hard halt on write failure ✅
-
-**Status: ✅ N/A (non-document workflow)**
-
----
-
-## Validation Design Check
-
-**Domain Assessment:** Code analysis and documentation generation — not compliance/safety/legal.
-
-**Validation within workflow:**
-- step-08-validate.md serves as an internal validation step
-- Loads stack-skill-template.md for structure checks ✅
-- Has systematic check sequence (7 verification phases) ✅
-- Auto-proceeds through checks ✅
-- Clear pass/advisory findings ✅
-- Advisory mode (doesn't block, always proceeds to report) ✅
-
-**Tri-modal assessment:** This is a create-only workflow. Internal validation (step-08) is appropriate. A separate steps-v/ folder is not required.
-
-**Status: ✅ PASS**
-
----
-
-## Instruction Style Check
-
-**Domain:** Code analysis pipeline — prescriptive is the CORRECT style.
-
-| Step | Style | Appropriate | Notes |
-|------|-------|-------------|-------|
-| step-01 | Prescriptive | ✅ | MANDATORY SEQUENCE, numbered steps |
-| step-02 | Prescriptive | ✅ | Systematic scan-and-parse instructions |
-| step-03 | Prescriptive | ✅ | Data presentation then scope confirmation |
-| step-04 | Prescriptive | ✅ | Subprocess launch protocol with structured returns |
-| step-05 | Prescriptive | ✅ | Pair generation + classification algorithm |
-| step-06 | Prescriptive | ✅ | Template-driven compilation sequence |
-| step-07 | Prescriptive | ✅ | File writing sequence with hard halt |
-| step-08 | Prescriptive | ✅ | Checklist validation sequence |
-| step-09 | Prescriptive | ✅ | Report format with positive framing |
-
-**Consistent prescriptive indicators across all steps:**
-- MANDATORY SEQUENCE with numbered sections ✅
-- FORBIDDEN boundary enforcement ✅
-- Zero-hallucination rules with file:line citation requirements ✅
-- Ferris Architect mode reinforcement ✅
-- Confidence tier labeling requirements ✅
-
-**Status: ✅ PASS**
-
----
-
-## Collaborative Experience Check
-
-**Workflow Type Assessment:** This is a prescriptive automation pipeline, not a collaborative facilitation workflow. 7 of 9 steps auto-proceed. Interaction quality is assessed at the 2 gates.
-
-**Gate 1 (step-03 — Scope Confirmation):**
-- Presents ranked data table with import counts ✅
-- Lets user confirm, add, exclude, or override ✅
-- Data-driven decision, not interrogation ✅
-- Progressive: presents data first, then asks for confirmation ✅
-
-**Gate 2 (step-06 — Compile Checkpoint):**
-- Presents full compiled SKILL.md preview ✅
-- Shows compilation stats ✅
-- Asks specific review questions (integration layer, per-library sections) ✅
-- Review-focused, not interrogation ✅
-
-**Progression and Arc:**
-- Clear progression: detect → rank → confirm → extract → analyze → compile → write → validate → report ✅
-- Each step builds on previous work with explicit context boundaries ✅
-- User knows where they are (step summaries with counts) ✅
-- Satisfying completion with positive framing ("Stack forged: ...") ✅
-
-**User Experience:** A collaborative partner working WITH the user at key decision points, autonomous execution in between.
-
-**Status: ✅ PASS**
-
----
-
-## Subprocess Optimization Opportunities
-
-**Applied Optimizations (from design):**
-
-| Step | Pattern | Operation | Fallback |
-|------|---------|-----------|----------|
-| step-03 | Pattern 1 (Grep) | Import counting across codebase | Sequential grep in main thread ✅ |
-| step-04 | Pattern 4 (Parallel) | Per-library extraction | Sequential extraction in main thread ✅ |
-| step-05 | Pattern 1 (Grep) | Co-import file detection | File list intersection in main thread ✅ |
-
-**All 3 subprocess steps include:**
-- Universal fallback rule in MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES ✅
-- Step-specific fallback in Step-Specific Rules ✅
-- Graceful degradation instructions ✅
-
-**Additional Opportunities:** None identified. Remaining steps (01, 02, 06-09) are simple sequential operations where subprocess overhead would exceed benefit.
-
-**Status: ✅ PASS — All designed optimizations implemented with graceful fallbacks**
-
----
-
-## Cohesive Review
-
-**Overall Assessment: Excellent**
-
-**Flow Walkthrough:**
-The workflow progresses logically from initialization through discovery, confirmation, extraction, analysis, compilation, output, validation, and reporting. Each step's context boundaries explicitly name what data flows in from previous steps and what it produces, creating a clear data pipeline.
-
-**Cohesiveness:**
-- Steps build progressively on accumulated state ✅
-- Consistent Ferris Architect voice and zero-hallucination rules throughout ✅
-- Error handling matrix covers 7 scenarios with appropriate responses ✅
-- Two strategic gates (scope confirmation, compile review) at the right points ✅
-
-**Strengths:**
-- Integration layer as primary value — not just concatenated library docs
-- Confidence tier system (T1/T1-low/T2) throughout all outputs
-- Forge-tier dependent extraction (Quick/Forge/Deep)
-- Workspace artifacts (provenance-map.json, evidence-report.md) for traceability
-- Graceful degradation (single library failure doesn't halt; zero integrations is valid)
-
-**Potential Improvements:**
-- step-07 at 202 lines could be tightened (advisory only)
-
-**Would this workflow work in practice?** Yes. The pipeline is well-structured, error handling is comprehensive, and the two user gates are at the right decision points.
-
-**Status: ✅ EXCELLENT**
-
----
-
-## Plan Quality Validation
-
-**Plan File:** workflow-plan-create-stack-skill.md (exists)
-
-### Implementation Coverage
-
-| Requirement Area | Specified | Implemented | Quality | Status |
-|------------------|-----------|-------------|---------|--------|
-| Discovery/Vision | Consolidated stack skill with integration patterns | 9-step pipeline with integration-first design | High | ✅ |
-| Classification: Document Output | false (action-based) | Non-document, multi-file generation | High | ✅ |
-| Classification: Module | SKF | SKF module, skf/config.yaml reference | High | ✅ |
-| Classification: Session | single-session | No continuation logic, subprocess for heavy work | High | ✅ |
-| Classification: Lifecycle | create-only | steps-c/ only | High | ✅ |
-| Flow Structure | Linear pipeline, 9 steps | 9 sequential steps, 01-09 | High | ✅ |
-| User Interaction | 2 gates (steps 03, 06) | Gate 1 scope, Gate 2 compile — both implemented | High | ✅ |
-| Inputs | Project root + optional deps/overrides | step-01 accepts all three | High | ✅ |
-| Outputs | SKILL.md + 5 file types | All 7 output file types in step-07 | High | ✅ |
-| Instruction Style | Prescriptive | All steps prescriptive with MANDATORY SEQUENCE | High | ✅ |
-| Subprocess Optimization | 3 steps (03, 04, 05) | All 3 implemented with fallbacks | High | ✅ |
-| Error Handling | 7-scenario matrix | All 7 scenarios handled across steps | High | ✅ |
-| Workflow Chaining | setup-forge prerequisite | step-01 validates forge-tier.yaml and checks `preferences.yaml` for `tier_override` | High | ✅ |
-| Data Files | 3 files (manifest, integration, template) | All 3 created in data/ folder | High | ✅ |
-
-### Implementation Gaps
-
-None identified.
-
-### Plan-Reality Alignment
-
-The built workflow fully implements all plan requirements. The original spec's 9 steps are all covered (with steps 02-03 from spec merged into step-03 as designed). Step-01-init was added per BMAD standards. All 10 plan improvements beyond the original spec are implemented.
-
-**Plan Implementation Score: 100%**
-
-**Status: ✅ Fully Implemented — High Quality**
-
----
-
-## Summary
-
-**Validation Completed:** 2026-02-27
-
-**Overall Status: ✅ EXCELLENT**
-
-| Validation Check | Result |
-|------------------|--------|
-| File Structure & Size | ✅ PASS (1 advisory: step-07 at 202 lines) |
-| Frontmatter Validation | ⚠️ FAIL (1 unused variable: `skfConfigFile` in step-01) |
-| Critical Path Violations | ✅ PASS |
-| Menu Handling | ✅ PASS |
-| Step Type Validation | ✅ PASS |
-| Output Format | ✅ N/A (non-document) |
-| Validation Design | ✅ PASS |
-| Instruction Style | ✅ PASS |
-| Collaborative Experience | ✅ PASS |
-| Subprocess Optimization | ✅ PASS |
-| Cohesive Review | ✅ EXCELLENT |
-| Plan Quality | ✅ Fully Implemented (100%) |
-
-### Issues to Fix
-
-**Must fix (1):**
-- Remove `skfConfigFile` from step-01-init.md frontmatter (unused variable — SKF config is loaded in workflow.md, not step-01)
-
-**Advisory (1):**
-- step-07-generate-output.md at 202 lines — approaching 200-line recommended limit. Consider extracting the forge data artifact templates to data/ file if future edits push it further.
-
-### Key Strengths
-
-- Integration-first architecture — primary value is how libraries connect
-- Comprehensive confidence tier system throughout
-- Forge-tier dependent extraction with graceful degradation
-- All 3 subprocess optimizations with fallbacks
-- 100% plan implementation with 10 improvements beyond original spec
-
-### Recommendation
-
-**Ready to use** after removing the 1 unused frontmatter variable. The workflow is well-structured, thoroughly designed, and comprehensively covers the original specification with significant enhancements.