bmad-method 6.9.1-next.2 → 6.9.1-next.4
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ failed_layers: '' # set at runtime: comma-separated list of layers that failed o
|
|
|
18
18
|
|
|
19
19
|
2. Launch parallel subagents without conversation context. If subagents are not available, generate prompt files in `{implementation_artifacts}` — one per reviewer role below — and HALT. Ask the user to run each in a separate session (ideally a different LLM) and paste back the findings. When findings are pasted, resume from this point and proceed to step 3.
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
|
-
- **Blind Hunter** —
|
|
21
|
+
- **Blind Hunter** — prompt: "Use the `bmad-review-adversarial-general` skill on `{diff_output}`."
|
|
22
22
|
|
|
23
|
-
- **Edge Case Hunter** —
|
|
23
|
+
- **Edge Case Hunter** — prompt: "Use the `bmad-review-edge-case-hunter` skill on `{diff_output}`."
|
|
24
24
|
|
|
25
25
|
- **Acceptance Auditor** (only if `{review_mode}` = `"full"`) — receives `{diff_output}`, the content of the file at `{spec_file}`, and any loaded context docs. Its prompt:
|
|
26
26
|
> You are an Acceptance Auditor. Review this diff against the spec and context docs. Check for: violations of acceptance criteria, deviations from spec intent, missing implementation of specified behavior, contradictions between spec constraints and actual code. Output findings as a Markdown list. Each finding: one-line title, which AC/constraint it violates, and evidence from the diff.
|
|
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ Do NOT `git add` anything — this is read-only inspection.
|
|
|
25
25
|
|
|
26
26
|
Launch two subagents without prior session context.
|
|
27
27
|
|
|
28
|
-
- **Blind hunter** —
|
|
29
|
-
- **Edge case hunter** —
|
|
28
|
+
- **Blind hunter** — prompt: "Use the `bmad-review-adversarial-general` skill on `{diff_output}`."
|
|
29
|
+
- **Edge case hunter** — prompt: "Use the `bmad-review-edge-case-hunter` skill on `{diff_output}`."
|
|
30
30
|
|
|
31
31
|
### Classify
|
|
32
32
|
|
|
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ Prepare `Auto Run Result` details:
|
|
|
81
81
|
- Verification performed, including command outcomes or manual inspection notes
|
|
82
82
|
- Any residual risks
|
|
83
83
|
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
84
|
+
Set `{spec_file}` frontmatter `followup_review_recommended` from the judgment above.
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
If version control is available, commit. Do not push.
|
|
85
87
|
|
|
86
88
|
HALT with status `done`.
|
|
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ Do NOT `git add` anything — this is read-only inspection.
|
|
|
24
24
|
|
|
25
25
|
Launch two subagents without conversation context. If no subagents are available, generate two review prompt files in `{implementation_artifacts}` — one per reviewer role below — and HALT. Ask the human to run each in a separate session (ideally a different LLM) and paste back the findings.
|
|
26
26
|
|
|
27
|
-
- **Blind hunter** —
|
|
28
|
-
- **Edge case hunter** —
|
|
27
|
+
- **Blind hunter** — prompt: "Use the `bmad-review-adversarial-general` skill on `{diff_output}`."
|
|
28
|
+
- **Edge case hunter** — prompt: "Use the `bmad-review-edge-case-hunter` skill on `{diff_output}`."
|
|
29
29
|
|
|
30
30
|
### Classify
|
|
31
31
|
|