bmad-method 6.9.1-next.15 → 6.9.1-next.16
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -41,30 +41,32 @@ num,category,method_name,description,output_pattern
|
|
|
41
41
|
40,creative,Genre Mashup,Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination,domain A + domain B → hybrid insights
|
|
42
42
|
41,creative,Constraint Injection,Deliberately add an artificial limitation (budget - time - technology) to force novel solutions — creativity thrives under pressure,add constraint → forced creativity → remove constraint → evaluate
|
|
43
43
|
42,creative,Morphological Analysis,List independent parameters of a problem - enumerate options for each - then systematically combine — ensures you don't miss non-obvious configurations,parameters → options grid → combinations → evaluation
|
|
44
|
-
43,
|
|
45
|
-
44,framing,
|
|
46
|
-
45,framing,
|
|
47
|
-
46,
|
|
48
|
-
47,
|
|
49
|
-
48,learning,
|
|
50
|
-
49,
|
|
51
|
-
50,
|
|
52
|
-
51,
|
|
53
|
-
52,
|
|
54
|
-
53,research,
|
|
55
|
-
54,research,
|
|
56
|
-
55,
|
|
57
|
-
56,
|
|
58
|
-
57,
|
|
59
|
-
58,
|
|
60
|
-
59,risk,
|
|
61
|
-
60,risk,
|
|
62
|
-
61,risk,
|
|
63
|
-
62,risk,
|
|
64
|
-
63,risk,
|
|
65
|
-
64,
|
|
66
|
-
65,
|
|
67
|
-
66,technical,
|
|
68
|
-
67,technical,
|
|
69
|
-
68,technical,
|
|
70
|
-
69,technical,
|
|
44
|
+
43,creative,Subtraction,Improve by deliberately removing elements instead of adding them - counters the well-documented additive bias where people overlook subtractive changes that would simplify and strengthen the work,current state → what to remove → simplified result
|
|
45
|
+
44,framing,Abstraction Laddering,"Move up (""why?"") for strategic clarity or down (""how?"") for tactical detail — ensures you're solving at the right altitude",concrete ↔ abstract → right level
|
|
46
|
+
45,framing,Reframe the Question,Challenge whether the stated problem is the real problem — often the question itself is wrong and a better framing unlocks an easy answer,stated problem → reframe → true problem → solution
|
|
47
|
+
46,framing,Stakeholder Lens Rotation,Serially adopt each stakeholder's world-view to see the same situation differently — reveals whose needs are being overlooked,perspective A → B → C → gaps found
|
|
48
|
+
47,framing,Map Is Not the Territory,Treat any model or diagram as a lossy abstraction of reality - check where the representation diverges from the real system before trusting it,model → reality check → divergences found → corrected understanding
|
|
49
|
+
48,learning,Feynman Technique,Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding,complex → simple → gaps → mastery
|
|
50
|
+
49,learning,Active Recall Testing,Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps,test → gaps → reinforcement
|
|
51
|
+
50,learning,Deliberate Practice Loop,Identify a specific sub-skill - drill it with immediate feedback - adjust - repeat — targeted improvement beats general repetition,isolate → drill → feedback → adjust → repeat
|
|
52
|
+
51,philosophical,Occam's Razor Application,Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging,options → simplification → selection
|
|
53
|
+
52,philosophical,Trolley Problem Variations,Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions,dilemma → analysis → decision
|
|
54
|
+
53,research,Literature Review Personas,Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality,sources → critiques → synthesis
|
|
55
|
+
54,research,Thesis Defense Simulation,Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions,thesis → challenges → defense → refinements
|
|
56
|
+
55,research,Comparative Analysis Matrix,Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring,options → criteria → scores → recommendation
|
|
57
|
+
56,research,Source Triangulation,Require at least three independent source types (quantitative - qualitative - expert) before accepting a claim — guards against single-source bias,claim → source A → source B → source C → confidence rating
|
|
58
|
+
57,retrospective,Hindsight Reflection,Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews,future view → insights → application
|
|
59
|
+
58,retrospective,Lessons Learned Extraction,Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement,experience → lessons → actions
|
|
60
|
+
59,risk,Pre-mortem Analysis,Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches,failure scenario → causes → prevention
|
|
61
|
+
60,risk,Failure Mode Analysis,Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems,components → failures → prevention
|
|
62
|
+
61,risk,Challenge from Critical Perspective,Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink,assumptions → challenges → strengthening
|
|
63
|
+
62,risk,Identify Potential Risks,Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation,categories → risks → mitigations
|
|
64
|
+
63,risk,Chaos Monkey Scenarios,Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully,break → observe → harden
|
|
65
|
+
64,risk,Assumption Audit,Explicitly list every assumption underlying a plan - rate each by confidence and impact - then stress-test the weakest — prevents building on shaky foundations,list → rate → stress-test → shore up
|
|
66
|
+
65,risk,Cascading Failure Simulation,Trace how one component's failure propagates through dependencies — reveals hidden coupling and single points of failure,trigger failure → trace propagation → find amplifiers → decouple
|
|
67
|
+
66,technical,Architecture Decision Records,Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented,options → trade-offs → decision → rationale
|
|
68
|
+
67,technical,Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved,Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels,simple → detailed → technical → aha
|
|
69
|
+
68,technical,Algorithm Olympics,Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison,implementations → benchmarks → winner
|
|
70
|
+
69,technical,Security Audit Personas,Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles,vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance
|
|
71
|
+
70,technical,Performance Profiler Panel,Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack,symptoms → analysis → optimizations
|
|
72
|
+
71,technical,Boundary & Edge Case Sweep,Systematically test extremes - zeros - nulls - maximums - and type mismatches — catches the failures that happy-path thinking always misses,inputs → boundaries → edge cases → failures found
|