bmad-method 6.8.0 → 6.8.1-next.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/SKILL.md +78 -2
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/analysis/catalog-analysis.md +239 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/analysis/method-matrix.csv +109 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/assets/brain-icons.json +166 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/assets/brain-methods.csv +109 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/assets/brain-selector.html +326 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/customize.toml +84 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/references/converge.md +24 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/references/finalize.md +26 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/references/headless.md +54 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/references/in-chat-techniques.md +18 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/references/mode-autonomous.md +10 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/references/mode-facilitator.md +11 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/references/mode-partner.md +16 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/references/resume.md +5 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/scripts/brain.py +740 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/scripts/memlog.py +202 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/scripts/tests/test_brain.py +217 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/scripts/tests/test_memlog.py +265 -0
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-party-mode/SKILL.md +44 -97
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/brain-methods.csv +0 -62
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/steps/step-01-session-setup.md +0 -214
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/steps/step-01b-continue.md +0 -124
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/steps/step-02a-user-selected.md +0 -229
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/steps/step-02b-ai-recommended.md +0 -239
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/steps/step-02c-random-selection.md +0 -211
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/steps/step-02d-progressive-flow.md +0 -266
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/steps/step-03-technique-execution.md +0 -403
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/steps/step-04-idea-organization.md +0 -305
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/template.md +0 -15
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/workflow.md +0 -53
|
@@ -1,128 +1,75 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-party-mode
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Orchestrates group discussions between installed BMAD agents
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Orchestrates lively group discussions between installed BMAD agents or other personas. Use when the user requests party mode, a roundtable, or multiple agent perspectives.'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Party Mode
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
8
|
+
Run a roundtable where BMAD agents talk to each other, and to the user, like a real group of distinct people in conversation. Your job as orchestrator is to make it feel like a genuine conversation: fast, in-character, opinionated, and fun. Everything below is an objective, not a script. Use whatever mechanism your model and harness make available to hit it.
|
|
9
9
|
|
|
10
|
-
##
|
|
10
|
+
## What "Good" Feels Like
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
12
|
+
- **It reads like people talking, not reports being filed.** Short turns. Reactions to what was just said. Banter. The energy of a group chat, not a stack of memos.
|
|
13
|
+
- **Every persona is unmistakably themselves:** their voice, humor, pet peeves, and ethos. If you hid the name labels, you'd still know who's speaking.
|
|
14
|
+
- **They clash.** Real drama beats consensus. Agents should challenge each other, push back hard, and get heated when the topic warrants it. Nobody is here to clap each other (or the user) on the back. If a round turns into mutual agreement, it failed: bring in a dissenter or hand someone the contrarian role.
|
|
15
|
+
- **Brevity by default.** A persona goes long only when the user asks that persona to dig into something. Nobody delivers a wall of text unprompted. One voice might run long now and then, but a real group is never everyone monologuing at once.
|
|
13
16
|
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
17
|
+
If a round comes back feeling like four essays stapled together, you missed the objective. Tighten it the next round.
|
|
15
18
|
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
19
|
+
## Setup
|
|
17
20
|
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
21
|
+
1. Load `{project-root}/_bmad/core/config.yaml`: greet with `{user_name}`, speak in `{communication_language}`.
|
|
22
|
+
2. Resolve the roster:
|
|
23
|
+
```bash
|
|
24
|
+
python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_config.py --project-root {project-root} --key agents
|
|
25
|
+
```
|
|
26
|
+
Each entry is keyed by `code` and carries `name`, `title`, `icon`, `description`, `module`, and `team`.
|
|
27
|
+
3. Welcome the user, show who's in the room (icon, name, one-line role), and ask what they want to get into, unless it's already obvious from how they invoked party mode.
|
|
28
|
+
4. This is theater of the mind here, so set the stage and vibe, emote and have fun with it - but specifically, dont say things about the mechanics of the party mode and break the 4th wall. Don't say "you have 4 agents in the room" or "agent X says". Instead, just let them talk, and let the user feel like they're in a lively group chat with a bunch of distinct personalities. Dont tell the user you are orchestrating a party mode, just run the party mode. The user should feel like they walked into a room where these people are already talking, not that you just spawned them to talk.
|
|
20
29
|
|
|
21
|
-
##
|
|
30
|
+
## How It Runs
|
|
22
31
|
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
32
|
+
**Default: you voice the room.** Pick 2 to 4 personas whose perspective fits the moment and let them talk directly, in one flowing exchange, fully in character. This is what keeps it fast and conversational. Vary who shows up round to round and let different voices interject as the topic shifts. Don't fall back on the same three agents every time.
|
|
24
33
|
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
- Use `{user_name}` for greeting
|
|
27
|
-
- Use `{communication_language}` for all communications
|
|
34
|
+
Each turn opens with `{icon} **{name}:**` and then that persona speaks. Present turns back to back so it reads as one conversation. Don't summarize, blend, or narrate what they "would" say. Let them say it.
|
|
28
35
|
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
36
|
+
**When independence matters, spawn them for real.** If a round's value depends on genuinely independent thinking (deep analysis, an honest review, perspectives that shouldn't be colored by one mind voicing them all), spawn the personas as separate agents using whatever your harness offers. Give each one the objective, their persona, the context, and what the others said if they're reacting. Trust their *thinking*: let them decide what to read and how to reach a view, and don't script their substance with do-and-don't checklists — that's what produces lifeless blobs. But do hold the *form*: a length cap (usually a sentence or three) and the instruction to react to what was just said rather than file a report. Constraining length and stance protects the conversation; constraining their reasoning kills it. Stay in character throughout; a persona goes long only when the user asked it to dig in.
|
|
30
37
|
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_config.py --project-root {project-root} --key agents
|
|
33
|
-
```
|
|
38
|
+
Spawn in parallel for independent first-takes — everyone reacts to the topic fresh, fast. Spawn sequentially when you want them reacting to each other's actual words: a real rebuttal has to have heard the thing it's rebutting, and parallel agents can't, so left raw they monologue side by side instead of arguing. Sequential is slower but it's the only way subagents genuinely engage. Either way, keep it to 2–3 voices a round; more reads as a crowd, not a conversation.
|
|
34
39
|
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
40
|
+
By default you voice the room — for ordinary back-and-forth it's faster and feels more alive — and you reach for spawning when a round genuinely needs independent minds. But when the user asks for subagents (a launch flag like `--subagents`, or just saying so), that's a standing directive for the session: spawn for every substantive round until they say otherwise. Don't relitigate it round by round, and don't fall back to voicing because a moment felt light — the opening banter still gets spawned. A user who pinned the mode already made that call for you.
|
|
36
41
|
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
42
|
+
**Model choice:** match the model to the round. Something quick for banter, something stronger for deep work. If the user pins a model (for example, `--model <name>`), use it for everyone.
|
|
38
43
|
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
44
|
+
## Make It Feel Like One Conversation
|
|
40
45
|
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
46
|
+
Whether you voiced the room or spawned subagents, your job before presenting is the same: make it read like people responding to each other, not a row of separate answers all aimed at the user.
|
|
42
47
|
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
48
|
+
This matters most with subagents. Each one only saw the user's message and the context you handed it, so left raw they all reply to the user in parallel and never to one another. Stitch them together. Reorder turns so a rebuttal lands right after the thing it rebuts. Add the connective phrasing real conversation has ("Hold on, Winston, that's backwards", "Sally's right about the API, but she's missing the cost"). Let one persona pick up a thread another dropped, or cut in mid-thought.
|
|
44
49
|
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
50
|
+
Raw subagent output is raw material, never the final render — you cut it, interleave it, trim it. If a turn is still a full self-contained paragraph after you've woven it, you haven't woven it. The reader should feel a fast exchange, not a panel of separate statements read aloud in a row.
|
|
46
51
|
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
52
|
+
The hard rule: never change what an agent actually argued. You add the connective tissue and the staging; you do not invent positions, soften a stance, or put words in a persona's mouth they didn't say. Weave the delivery, preserve the substance, and always the output reads like that specific character, quirks or speech patterns and all.
|
|
48
53
|
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
- **Complex or cross-cutting topic**: 3-4 agents from different domains
|
|
51
|
-
- **User names specific agents**: Always include those, plus 1-2 complementary voices
|
|
52
|
-
- **User asks an agent to respond to another**: Spawn just that agent with the other's response as context
|
|
53
|
-
- **Rotate over time** — avoid the same 2 agents dominating every round
|
|
54
|
+
## Following the User's Lead
|
|
54
55
|
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
+
The user steers. Whatever they raise, serve the conversation:
|
|
56
57
|
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
+
- A new topic: fresh voices, keep it moving.
|
|
59
|
+
- "Winston, what do you make of Sally's take?": just Winston, reacting to Sally.
|
|
60
|
+
- "Bring in Amelia": Amelia joins, caught up on what's been said.
|
|
61
|
+
- "Go deeper on that, John": this is the cue to let John stretch out. Depth is earned by a direct ask.
|
|
62
|
+
- A question to the whole room: everyone relevant chimes in.
|
|
58
63
|
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
```
|
|
61
|
-
You are {name} ({title}), a BMAD agent in a collaborative roundtable discussion.
|
|
64
|
+
Any combination, any time, from one voice to the whole table.
|
|
62
65
|
|
|
63
|
-
##
|
|
64
|
-
{icon} {name} — {description}
|
|
66
|
+
## Keeping It Healthy
|
|
65
67
|
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
+
- **Everyone agreeing?** Drop in a contrarian, or hand someone the devil's-advocate hat.
|
|
69
|
+
- **Going in circles?** Name the impasse and ask the user where to point next.
|
|
70
|
+
- **User's gone quiet?** Ask straight: keep going, switch topics, or wrap up?
|
|
71
|
+
- **A flat turn?** Don't retry it. Move on; the user will ask for more if they want it.
|
|
68
72
|
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
73
|
+
## Wrapping Up
|
|
70
74
|
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
{if this is a cross-talk or reaction request, include the responses being reacted to — otherwise omit this section}
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
## The User's Message
|
|
75
|
-
{the user's actual message}
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
## Guidelines
|
|
78
|
-
- Respond authentically as {name}. Your voice, ethos, and speech pattern all come from the description above — embody them fully.
|
|
79
|
-
- Start your response with: {icon} **{name}:**
|
|
80
|
-
- Speak in {communication_language}.
|
|
81
|
-
- Scale your response to the substance — don't pad. If you have a brief point, make it briefly.
|
|
82
|
-
- Disagree with other agents when your perspective tells you to. Don't hedge or be polite about it.
|
|
83
|
-
- If you have nothing substantive to add, say so in one sentence rather than manufacturing an opinion.
|
|
84
|
-
- You may ask the user direct questions if something needs clarification.
|
|
85
|
-
- Do NOT use tools. Just respond with your perspective.
|
|
86
|
-
```
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
**Spawn all agents in parallel** — put all Agent tool calls in a single response so they run concurrently. If `--model` was specified, use that model for all subagents. Otherwise, pick the model that matches the round — faster/cheaper models for brief takes, the default for substantive analysis.
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
**Solo mode** — if `--solo` is active, skip spawning. Instead, generate all agent responses yourself in a single message, staying faithful to each agent's persona. Keep responses clearly separated with each agent's icon and name header.
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
### 3. Present Responses
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
Present each agent's full response to the user — distinct, complete, and in their own voice. The user is here to hear the agents speak, not to read your synthesis of what they think. Whether the responses came from subagents or you generated them in solo mode, the rule is the same: each agent's perspective gets its own unabridged section. Never blend, paraphrase, or condense agent responses into a summary.
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
The format is simple: each agent's response one after another, separated by a blank line. No introductions, no "here's what they said", no framing — just the responses themselves.
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
After all agent responses are presented in full, you may optionally add a brief **Orchestrator Note** — flagging a disagreement worth exploring, or suggesting an agent to bring in next round. Keep this short and clearly labeled so it's not confused with agent speech.
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
### 4. Handle Follow-ups
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
The user drives what happens next. Common patterns:
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
| User says... | You do... |
|
|
105
|
-
|---|---|
|
|
106
|
-
| Continues the general discussion | Pick fresh agents, repeat the loop |
|
|
107
|
-
| "Winston, what do you think about what Sally said?" | Spawn just Winston with Sally's response as context |
|
|
108
|
-
| "Bring in Amelia on this" | Spawn Amelia with a summary of the discussion so far |
|
|
109
|
-
| "I agree with John, let's go deeper on that" | Spawn John + 1-2 others to expand on John's point |
|
|
110
|
-
| "What would Mary and Amelia think about Winston's approach?" | Spawn Mary and Amelia with Winston's response as context |
|
|
111
|
-
| Asks a question directed at everyone | Back to step 1 with all agents |
|
|
112
|
-
|
|
113
|
-
The key insight: you can spawn any combination at any time. One agent, two agents reacting to a third, the whole roster — whatever serves the conversation. Each spawn is cheap and independent.
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
115
|
-
## Keeping Context Manageable
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
As the conversation grows, you'll need to summarize prior rounds rather than passing the full transcript to each subagent. Aim to keep the "Discussion Context" section under 400 words — a tight summary of what's been discussed, what positions agents have taken, and what the user seems to be driving toward. Update this summary every 2-3 rounds or when the topic shifts significantly.
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
119
|
-
## When Things Go Sideways
|
|
120
|
-
|
|
121
|
-
- **Agents are all saying the same thing**: Bring in a contrarian voice, or ask a specific agent to play devil's advocate by framing the prompt that way.
|
|
122
|
-
- **Discussion is going in circles**: Summarize the impasse and ask the user what angle they want to explore next.
|
|
123
|
-
- **User seems disengaged**: Ask directly — continue, change topic, or wrap up?
|
|
124
|
-
- **Agent gives a weak response**: Don't retry. Present it and let the user decide if they want more from that agent.
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
126
|
-
## Exit
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
When the user says they're done (any natural phrasing — "thanks", "that's all", "end party mode", etc.), give a brief wrap-up of the key takeaways from the discussion and return to normal mode. Don't force exit triggers — just read the room.
|
|
75
|
+
When the user signals they're done (any phrasing: "thanks", "that's all", "end party"), give a quick read-back of the best takeaways and drop back to normal mode. Read the room; don't wait for a magic word.
|
|
@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
category,technique_name,description
|
|
2
|
-
collaborative,Yes And Building,"Build momentum through positive additions where each idea becomes a launching pad - use prompts like 'Yes and we could also...' or 'Building on that idea...' to create energetic collaborative flow that builds upon previous contributions"
|
|
3
|
-
collaborative,Brain Writing Round Robin,"Silent idea generation followed by building on others' written concepts - gives quieter voices equal contribution while maintaining documentation through the sequence of writing silently, passing ideas, and building on received concepts"
|
|
4
|
-
collaborative,Random Stimulation,"Use random words/images as creative catalysts to force unexpected connections - breaks through mental blocks with serendipitous inspiration by asking how random elements relate, what connections exist, and forcing relationships"
|
|
5
|
-
collaborative,Role Playing,"Generate solutions from multiple stakeholder perspectives to build empathy while ensuring comprehensive consideration - embody different roles by asking what they want, how they'd approach problems, and what matters most to them"
|
|
6
|
-
collaborative,Ideation Relay Race,"Rapid-fire idea building under time pressure creates urgency and breakthroughs - structure with 30-second additions, quick building on ideas, and fast passing to maintain creative momentum and prevent overthinking"
|
|
7
|
-
creative,What If Scenarios,"Explore radical possibilities by questioning all constraints and assumptions - perfect for breaking through stuck thinking using prompts like 'What if we had unlimited resources?' 'What if the opposite were true?' or 'What if this problem didn't exist?'"
|
|
8
|
-
creative,Analogical Thinking,"Find creative solutions by drawing parallels to other domains - transfer successful patterns by asking 'This is like what?' 'How is this similar to...' and 'What other examples come to mind?' to connect to existing solutions"
|
|
9
|
-
creative,Reversal Inversion,"Deliberately flip problems upside down to reveal hidden assumptions and fresh angles - great when conventional approaches fail by asking 'What if we did the opposite?' 'How could we make this worse?' and 'What's the reverse approach?'"
|
|
10
|
-
creative,First Principles Thinking,"Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - essential for breakthrough innovation by asking 'What do we know for certain?' 'What are the fundamental truths?' and 'If we started from scratch?'"
|
|
11
|
-
creative,Forced Relationships,"Connect unrelated concepts to spark innovative bridges through creative collision - take two unrelated things, find connections between them, identify bridges, and explore how they could work together to generate unexpected solutions"
|
|
12
|
-
creative,Time Shifting,"Explore solutions across different time periods to reveal constraints and opportunities by asking 'How would this work in the past?' 'What about 100 years from now?' 'Different era constraints?' and 'What time-based solutions apply?'"
|
|
13
|
-
creative,Metaphor Mapping,"Use extended metaphors as thinking tools to explore problems from new angles - transforms abstract challenges into tangible narratives by asking 'This problem is like a metaphor,' extending the metaphor, and mapping elements to discover insights"
|
|
14
|
-
creative,Cross-Pollination,"Transfer solutions from completely different industries or domains to spark breakthrough innovations by asking how industry X would solve this, what patterns work in field Y, and how to adapt solutions from domain Z"
|
|
15
|
-
creative,Concept Blending,"Merge two or more existing concepts to create entirely new categories - goes beyond simple combination to genuine innovation by asking what emerges when concepts merge, what new category is created, and how the blend transcends original ideas"
|
|
16
|
-
creative,Reverse Brainstorming,"Generate problems instead of solutions to identify hidden opportunities and unexpected pathways by asking 'What could go wrong?' 'How could we make this fail?' and 'What problems could we create?' to reveal solution insights"
|
|
17
|
-
creative,Sensory Exploration,"Engage all five senses to discover multi-dimensional solution spaces beyond purely analytical thinking by asking what ideas feel, smell, taste, or sound like, and how different senses engage with the problem space"
|
|
18
|
-
deep,Five Whys,"Drill down through layers of causation to uncover root causes - essential for solving problems at source rather than symptoms by asking 'Why did this happen?' repeatedly until reaching fundamental drivers and ultimate causes"
|
|
19
|
-
deep,Morphological Analysis,"Systematically explore all possible parameter combinations for complex systems requiring comprehensive solution mapping - identify key parameters, list options for each, try different combinations, and identify emerging patterns"
|
|
20
|
-
deep,Provocation Technique,"Use deliberately provocative statements to extract useful ideas from seemingly absurd starting points - catalyzes breakthrough thinking by asking 'What if provocative statement?' 'How could this be useful?' 'What idea triggers?' and 'Extract the principle'"
|
|
21
|
-
deep,Assumption Reversal,"Challenge and flip core assumptions to rebuild from new foundations - essential for paradigm shifts by asking 'What assumptions are we making?' 'What if the opposite were true?' 'Challenge each assumption' and 'Rebuild from new assumptions'"
|
|
22
|
-
deep,Question Storming,"Generate questions before seeking answers to properly define problem space - ensures solving the right problem by asking only questions, no answers yet, focusing on what we don't know, and identifying what we should be asking"
|
|
23
|
-
deep,Constraint Mapping,"Identify and visualize all constraints to find promising pathways around or through limitations - ask what all constraints exist, which are real vs imagined, and how to work around or eliminate barriers to solution space"
|
|
24
|
-
deep,Failure Analysis,"Study successful failures to extract valuable insights and avoid common pitfalls - learns from what didn't work by asking what went wrong, why it failed, what lessons emerged, and how to apply failure wisdom to current challenges"
|
|
25
|
-
deep,Emergent Thinking,"Allow solutions to emerge organically without forcing linear progression - embraces complexity and natural development by asking what patterns emerge, what wants to happen naturally, and what's trying to emerge from the system"
|
|
26
|
-
introspective_delight,Inner Child Conference,"Channel pure childhood curiosity and wonder to rekindle playful exploration - ask what 7-year-old you would ask, use 'why why why' questioning, make it fun again, and forbid boring thinking to access innocent questioning that cuts through adult complications"
|
|
27
|
-
introspective_delight,Shadow Work Mining,"Explore what you're actively avoiding or resisting to uncover hidden insights - examine unconscious blocks and resistance patterns by asking what you're avoiding, where's resistance, what scares you, and mining the shadows for buried wisdom"
|
|
28
|
-
introspective_delight,Values Archaeology,"Excavate deep personal values driving decisions to clarify authentic priorities - dig to bedrock motivations by asking what really matters, why you care, what's non-negotiable, and what core values guide your choices"
|
|
29
|
-
introspective_delight,Future Self Interview,"Seek wisdom from wiser future self for long-term perspective - gain temporal self-mentoring by asking your 80-year-old self what they'd tell younger you, how future wisdom speaks, and what long-term perspective reveals"
|
|
30
|
-
introspective_delight,Body Wisdom Dialogue,"Let physical sensations and gut feelings guide ideation - tap somatic intelligence often ignored by mental approaches by asking what your body says, where you feel it, trusting tension, and following physical cues for embodied wisdom"
|
|
31
|
-
introspective_delight,Permission Giving,"Grant explicit permission to think impossible thoughts and break self-imposed creative barriers - give yourself permission to explore, try, experiment, and break free from limitations that constrain authentic creative expression"
|
|
32
|
-
structured,SCAMPER Method,"Systematic creativity through seven lenses for methodical product improvement and innovation - Substitute (what could you substitute), Combine (what could you combine), Adapt (how could you adapt), Modify (what could you modify), Put to other uses, Eliminate, Reverse"
|
|
33
|
-
structured,Six Thinking Hats,"Explore problems through six distinct perspectives without conflict - White Hat (facts), Red Hat (emotions), Yellow Hat (benefits), Black Hat (risks), Green Hat (creativity), Blue Hat (process) to ensure comprehensive analysis from all angles"
|
|
34
|
-
structured,Mind Mapping,"Visually branch ideas from central concept to discover connections and expand thinking - perfect for organizing complex thoughts and seeing big picture by putting main idea in center, branching concepts, and identifying sub-branches"
|
|
35
|
-
structured,Resource Constraints,"Generate innovative solutions by imposing extreme limitations - forces essential priorities and creative efficiency under pressure by asking what if you had only $1, no technology, one hour to solve, or minimal resources only"
|
|
36
|
-
structured,Decision Tree Mapping,"Map out all possible decision paths and outcomes to reveal hidden opportunities and risks - visualizes complex choice architectures by identifying possible paths, decision points, and where different choices lead"
|
|
37
|
-
structured,Solution Matrix,"Create systematic grid of problem variables and solution approaches to find optimal combinations and discover gaps - identify key variables, solution approaches, test combinations, and identify most effective pairings"
|
|
38
|
-
structured,Trait Transfer,"Borrow attributes from successful solutions in unrelated domains to enhance approach - systematically adapts winning characteristics by asking what traits make success X work, how to transfer these traits, and what they'd look like here"
|
|
39
|
-
theatrical,Time Travel Talk Show,"Interview past/present/future selves for temporal wisdom - playful method for gaining perspective across different life stages by interviewing past self, asking what future you'd say, and exploring different timeline perspectives"
|
|
40
|
-
theatrical,Alien Anthropologist,"Examine familiar problems through completely foreign eyes - reveals hidden assumptions by adopting outsider's bewildered perspective by becoming alien observer, asking what seems strange, and getting outside perspective insights"
|
|
41
|
-
theatrical,Dream Fusion Laboratory,"Start with impossible fantasy solutions then reverse-engineer practical steps - makes ambitious thinking actionable through backwards design by dreaming impossible solutions, working backwards to reality, and identifying bridging steps"
|
|
42
|
-
theatrical,Emotion Orchestra,"Let different emotions lead separate brainstorming sessions then harmonize - uses emotional intelligence for comprehensive perspective by exploring angry perspectives, joyful approaches, fearful considerations, hopeful solutions, then harmonizing all voices"
|
|
43
|
-
theatrical,Parallel Universe Cafe,"Explore solutions under alternative reality rules - breaks conventional thinking by changing fundamental assumptions about how things work by exploring different physics universes, alternative social norms, changed historical events, and reality rule variations"
|
|
44
|
-
theatrical,Persona Journey,"Embody different archetypes or personas to access diverse wisdom through character exploration - become the archetype, ask how persona would solve this, and explore what character sees that normal thinking misses"
|
|
45
|
-
wild,Chaos Engineering,"Deliberately break things to discover robust solutions - builds anti-fragility by stress-testing ideas against worst-case scenarios by asking what if everything went wrong, breaking on purpose, how it fails gracefully, and building from rubble"
|
|
46
|
-
wild,Guerrilla Gardening Ideas,"Plant unexpected solutions in unlikely places - uses surprise and unconventional placement for stealth innovation by asking where's the least expected place, planting ideas secretly, growing solutions underground, and implementing with surprise"
|
|
47
|
-
wild,Pirate Code Brainstorm,"Take what works from anywhere and remix without permission - encourages rule-bending rapid prototyping and maverick thinking by asking what pirates would steal, remixing without asking, taking best and running, and needing no permission"
|
|
48
|
-
wild,Zombie Apocalypse Planning,"Design solutions for extreme survival scenarios - strips away all but essential functions to find core value by asking what happens when society collapses, what basics work, building from nothing, and thinking in survival mode"
|
|
49
|
-
wild,Drunk History Retelling,"Explain complex ideas with uninhibited simplicity - removes overthinking barriers to find raw truth through simplified expression by explaining like you're tipsy, using no filter, sharing raw thoughts, and simplifying to absurdity"
|
|
50
|
-
wild,Anti-Solution,"Generate ways to make the problem worse or more interesting - reveals hidden assumptions through destructive creativity by asking how to sabotage this, what would make it fail spectacularly, and how to create more problems to find solution insights"
|
|
51
|
-
wild,Quantum Superposition,"Hold multiple contradictory solutions simultaneously until best emerges through observation and testing - explores how all solutions could be true simultaneously, how contradictions coexist, and what happens when outcomes are observed"
|
|
52
|
-
wild,Elemental Forces,"Imagine solutions being sculpted by natural elements to tap into primal creative energies - explore how earth would sculpt this, what fire would forge, how water flows through this, and what air reveals to access elemental wisdom"
|
|
53
|
-
biomimetic,Nature's Solutions,"Study how nature solves similar problems and adapt biological strategies to challenge - ask how nature would solve this, what ecosystems provide parallels, and what biological strategies apply to access 3.8 billion years of evolutionary wisdom"
|
|
54
|
-
biomimetic,Ecosystem Thinking,"Analyze problem as ecosystem to identify symbiotic relationships, natural succession, and ecological principles - explore symbiotic relationships, natural succession application, and ecological principles for systems thinking"
|
|
55
|
-
biomimetic,Evolutionary Pressure,"Apply evolutionary principles to gradually improve solutions through selective pressure and adaptation - ask how evolution would optimize this, what selective pressures apply, and how this adapts over time to harness natural selection wisdom"
|
|
56
|
-
quantum,Observer Effect,"Recognize how observing and measuring solutions changes their behavior - uses quantum principles for innovation by asking how observing changes this, what measurement effects matter, and how to use observer effect advantageously"
|
|
57
|
-
quantum,Entanglement Thinking,"Explore how different solution elements might be connected regardless of distance - reveals hidden relationships by asking what elements are entangled, how distant parts affect each other, and what hidden connections exist between solution components"
|
|
58
|
-
quantum,Superposition Collapse,"Hold multiple potential solutions simultaneously until constraints force single optimal outcome - leverages quantum decision theory by asking what if all options were possible, what constraints force collapse, and which solution emerges when observed"
|
|
59
|
-
cultural,Indigenous Wisdom,"Draw upon traditional knowledge systems and indigenous approaches overlooked by modern thinking - ask how specific cultures would approach this, what traditional knowledge applies, and what ancestral wisdom guides us to access overlooked problem-solving methods"
|
|
60
|
-
cultural,Fusion Cuisine,"Mix cultural approaches and perspectives like fusion cuisine - creates innovation through cultural cross-pollination by asking what happens when mixing culture A with culture B, what cultural hybrids emerge, and what fusion creates"
|
|
61
|
-
cultural,Ritual Innovation,"Apply ritual design principles to create transformative experiences and solutions - uses anthropological insights for human-centered design by asking what ritual would transform this, how to make it ceremonial, and what transformation this needs"
|
|
62
|
-
cultural,Mythic Frameworks,"Use myths and archetypal stories as frameworks for understanding and solving problems - taps into collective unconscious by asking what myth parallels this, what archetypes are involved, and how mythic structure informs solution"
|
|
@@ -1,214 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Step 1: Session Setup and Continuation Detection
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
|
6
|
-
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative facilitation
|
|
7
|
-
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
|
8
|
-
- 💬 FOCUS on session setup and continuation detection only
|
|
9
|
-
- 🚪 DETECT existing workflow state and handle continuation properly
|
|
10
|
-
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the `communication_language`
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
|
15
|
-
- 💾 Initialize document and update frontmatter
|
|
16
|
-
- 📖 Set up frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading next step
|
|
17
|
-
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until setup is complete
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
- Variables from workflow.md are available in memory
|
|
22
|
-
- Previous context = what's in output document + frontmatter
|
|
23
|
-
- Don't assume knowledge from other steps
|
|
24
|
-
- Brain techniques loaded on-demand from CSV when needed
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
## YOUR TASK:
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
Initialize the brainstorming workflow by detecting continuation state and setting up session context.
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE:
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
### 1. Check for Existing Sessions
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
First, check the brainstorming sessions folder for existing sessions:
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
- List all files in `{output_folder}/brainstorming/`
|
|
37
|
-
- **DO NOT read any file contents** - only list filenames
|
|
38
|
-
- If files exist, identify the most recent by date/time in the filename
|
|
39
|
-
- If no files exist, this is a fresh workflow
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
### 2. Handle Existing Sessions (If Files Found)
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
If existing session files are found:
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
- Display the most recent session filename (do NOT read its content)
|
|
46
|
-
- Ask the user: "Found existing session: `[filename]`. Would you like to:
|
|
47
|
-
**[1]** Continue this session
|
|
48
|
-
**[2]** Start a new session
|
|
49
|
-
**[3]** See all existing sessions"
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
**HALT — wait for user selection before proceeding.**
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
- If user selects **[1]** (continue): Set `{brainstorming_session_output_file}` to that file path and load `./step-01b-continue.md`
|
|
54
|
-
- If user selects **[2]** (new): Generate new filename with current date/time and proceed to step 3
|
|
55
|
-
- If user selects **[3]** (see all): List all session filenames and ask which to continue or if new
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
### 3. Fresh Workflow Setup (If No Files or User Chooses New)
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
If no document exists or no `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter:
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
#### A. Initialize Document
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
Create the brainstorming session document:
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
```bash
|
|
66
|
-
# Create directory if needed
|
|
67
|
-
mkdir -p "$(dirname "{brainstorming_session_output_file}")"
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
# Initialize from template
|
|
70
|
-
cp "../template.md" "{brainstorming_session_output_file}"
|
|
71
|
-
```
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
#### B. Context File Check and Loading
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
**Check for Context File:**
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
- Check if `context_file` is provided in workflow invocation
|
|
78
|
-
- If context file exists and is readable, load it
|
|
79
|
-
- Parse context content for project-specific guidance
|
|
80
|
-
- Use context to inform session setup and approach recommendations
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
82
|
-
#### C. Session Context Gathering
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
"Welcome {{user_name}}! I'm excited to facilitate your brainstorming session. I'll guide you through proven creativity techniques to generate innovative ideas and breakthrough solutions.
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
86
|
-
**Context Loading:** [If context_file provided, indicate context is loaded]
|
|
87
|
-
**Context-Based Guidance:** [If context available, briefly mention focus areas]
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
**Let's set up your session for maximum creativity and productivity:**
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
**Session Discovery Questions:**
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
1. **What are we brainstorming about?** (The central topic or challenge)
|
|
94
|
-
2. **What specific outcomes are you hoping for?** (Types of ideas, solutions, or insights)"
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
#### D. Process User Responses
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
Wait for user responses, then:
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
**Session Analysis:**
|
|
101
|
-
"Based on your responses, I understand we're focusing on **[summarized topic]** with goals around **[summarized objectives]**.
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
**Session Parameters:**
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
|
-
- **Topic Focus:** [Clear topic articulation]
|
|
106
|
-
- **Primary Goals:** [Specific outcome objectives]
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
**Does this accurately capture what you want to achieve?**"
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
#### E. Update Frontmatter and Document
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
Update the document frontmatter:
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
```yaml
|
|
115
|
-
---
|
|
116
|
-
stepsCompleted: [1]
|
|
117
|
-
inputDocuments: []
|
|
118
|
-
session_topic: '[session_topic]'
|
|
119
|
-
session_goals: '[session_goals]'
|
|
120
|
-
selected_approach: ''
|
|
121
|
-
techniques_used: []
|
|
122
|
-
ideas_generated: []
|
|
123
|
-
context_file: '[context_file if provided]'
|
|
124
|
-
---
|
|
125
|
-
```
|
|
126
|
-
|
|
127
|
-
Append to document:
|
|
128
|
-
|
|
129
|
-
```markdown
|
|
130
|
-
## Session Overview
|
|
131
|
-
|
|
132
|
-
**Topic:** [session_topic]
|
|
133
|
-
**Goals:** [session_goals]
|
|
134
|
-
|
|
135
|
-
### Context Guidance
|
|
136
|
-
|
|
137
|
-
_[If context file provided, summarize key context and focus areas]_
|
|
138
|
-
|
|
139
|
-
### Session Setup
|
|
140
|
-
|
|
141
|
-
_[Content based on conversation about session parameters and facilitator approach]_
|
|
142
|
-
```
|
|
143
|
-
|
|
144
|
-
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
|
145
|
-
|
|
146
|
-
When user selects approach, append the session overview content directly to `{brainstorming_session_output_file}` using the structure from above.
|
|
147
|
-
|
|
148
|
-
### E. Continue to Technique Selection
|
|
149
|
-
|
|
150
|
-
"**Session setup complete!** I have a clear understanding of your goals and can select the perfect techniques for your brainstorming needs.
|
|
151
|
-
|
|
152
|
-
**Ready to explore technique approaches?**
|
|
153
|
-
[1] User-Selected Techniques - Browse our complete technique library
|
|
154
|
-
[2] AI-Recommended Techniques - Get customized suggestions based on your goals
|
|
155
|
-
[3] Random Technique Selection - Discover unexpected creative methods
|
|
156
|
-
[4] Progressive Technique Flow - Start broad, then systematically narrow focus
|
|
157
|
-
|
|
158
|
-
Which approach appeals to you most? (Enter 1-4)"
|
|
159
|
-
|
|
160
|
-
**HALT — wait for user selection before proceeding.**
|
|
161
|
-
|
|
162
|
-
### 4. Handle User Selection and Initial Document Append
|
|
163
|
-
|
|
164
|
-
#### When user selects approach number:
|
|
165
|
-
|
|
166
|
-
- **Append initial session overview to `{brainstorming_session_output_file}`**
|
|
167
|
-
- **Update frontmatter:** `stepsCompleted: [1]`, `selected_approach: '[selected approach]'`
|
|
168
|
-
- **Load the appropriate step-02 file** based on selection
|
|
169
|
-
|
|
170
|
-
### 5. Handle User Selection
|
|
171
|
-
|
|
172
|
-
After user selects approach number:
|
|
173
|
-
|
|
174
|
-
- **If 1:** Load `./step-02a-user-selected.md`
|
|
175
|
-
- **If 2:** Load `./step-02b-ai-recommended.md`
|
|
176
|
-
- **If 3:** Load `./step-02c-random-selection.md`
|
|
177
|
-
- **If 4:** Load `./step-02d-progressive-flow.md`
|
|
178
|
-
|
|
179
|
-
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
|
180
|
-
|
|
181
|
-
✅ Existing sessions detected without reading file contents
|
|
182
|
-
✅ User prompted to continue existing session or start new
|
|
183
|
-
✅ Correct session file selected for continuation
|
|
184
|
-
✅ Fresh workflow initialized with correct document structure
|
|
185
|
-
✅ Session context gathered and understood clearly
|
|
186
|
-
✅ User's approach selection captured and routed correctly
|
|
187
|
-
✅ Frontmatter properly updated with session state
|
|
188
|
-
✅ Document initialized with session overview section
|
|
189
|
-
|
|
190
|
-
## FAILURE MODES:
|
|
191
|
-
|
|
192
|
-
❌ Reading file contents during session detection (wastes context)
|
|
193
|
-
❌ Not asking user before continuing existing session
|
|
194
|
-
❌ Not properly routing user's continue/new session selection
|
|
195
|
-
❌ Missing continuation detection leading to duplicate work
|
|
196
|
-
❌ Insufficient session context gathering
|
|
197
|
-
❌ Not properly routing user's approach selection
|
|
198
|
-
❌ Frontmatter not updated with session parameters
|
|
199
|
-
|
|
200
|
-
## SESSION SETUP PROTOCOLS:
|
|
201
|
-
|
|
202
|
-
- Always list sessions folder WITHOUT reading file contents
|
|
203
|
-
- Ask user before continuing any existing session
|
|
204
|
-
- Only load continue step after user confirms
|
|
205
|
-
- Load brain techniques CSV only when needed for technique presentation
|
|
206
|
-
- Use collaborative facilitation language throughout
|
|
207
|
-
- Maintain psychological safety for creative exploration
|
|
208
|
-
- Clear next-step routing based on user preferences
|
|
209
|
-
|
|
210
|
-
## NEXT STEPS:
|
|
211
|
-
|
|
212
|
-
Based on user's approach selection, load the appropriate step-02 file for technique selection and facilitation.
|
|
213
|
-
|
|
214
|
-
Remember: Focus only on setup and routing - don't preload technique information or look ahead to execution steps!
|
|
@@ -1,124 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Step 1b: Workflow Continuation
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
- ✅ YOU ARE A CONTINUATION FACILITATOR, not a fresh starter
|
|
6
|
-
- 🎯 RESPECT EXISTING WORKFLOW state and progress
|
|
7
|
-
- 📋 UNDERSTAND PREVIOUS SESSION context and outcomes
|
|
8
|
-
- 🔍 SEAMLESSLY RESUME from where user left off
|
|
9
|
-
- 💬 MAINTAIN CONTINUITY in session flow and rapport
|
|
10
|
-
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the `communication_language`
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
- 🎯 Load and analyze existing document thoroughly
|
|
15
|
-
- 💾 Update frontmatter with continuation state
|
|
16
|
-
- 📖 Present current status and next options clearly
|
|
17
|
-
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN repeating completed work or asking same questions
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
- Existing document with frontmatter is available
|
|
22
|
-
- Previous steps completed indicate session progress
|
|
23
|
-
- Brain techniques CSV loaded when needed for remaining steps
|
|
24
|
-
- User may want to continue, modify, or restart
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
## YOUR TASK:
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
Analyze existing brainstorming session state and provide seamless continuation options.
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
## CONTINUATION SEQUENCE:
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
### 1. Analyze Existing Session
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
Load existing document and analyze current state:
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
**Document Analysis:**
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
- Read existing `{brainstorming_session_output_file}`
|
|
39
|
-
- Examine frontmatter for `stepsCompleted`, `session_topic`, `session_goals`
|
|
40
|
-
- Review content to understand session progress and outcomes
|
|
41
|
-
- Identify current stage and next logical steps
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
**Session Status Assessment:**
|
|
44
|
-
"Welcome back {{user_name}}! I can see your brainstorming session on **[session_topic]** from **[date]**.
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
**Current Session Status:**
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
- **Steps Completed:** [List completed steps]
|
|
49
|
-
- **Techniques Used:** [List techniques from frontmatter]
|
|
50
|
-
- **Ideas Generated:** [Number from frontmatter]
|
|
51
|
-
- **Current Stage:** [Assess where they left off]
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
**Session Progress:**
|
|
54
|
-
[Brief summary of what was accomplished and what remains]"
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
### 2. Present Continuation Options
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
Based on session analysis, provide appropriate options:
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
**If Session Completed:**
|
|
61
|
-
"Your brainstorming session appears to be complete!
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
**Options:**
|
|
64
|
-
[1] Review Results - Go through your documented ideas and insights
|
|
65
|
-
[2] Start New Session - Begin brainstorming on a new topic
|
|
66
|
-
[3] Extend Session - Add more techniques or explore new angles"
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
**HALT — wait for user selection before proceeding.**
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
**If Session In Progress:**
|
|
71
|
-
"Let's continue where we left off!
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
**Current Progress:**
|
|
74
|
-
[Description of current stage and accomplishments]
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
**Next Steps:**
|
|
77
|
-
[Continue with appropriate next step based on workflow state]"
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
### 3. Handle User Choice
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
Route to appropriate next step based on selection:
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
**Review Results:** Load appropriate review/navigation step
|
|
84
|
-
**New Session:** Start fresh workflow initialization
|
|
85
|
-
**Extend Session:** Continue with next technique or phase
|
|
86
|
-
**Continue Progress:** Resume from current workflow step
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
### 4. Update Session State
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
Update frontmatter to reflect continuation:
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
```yaml
|
|
93
|
-
---
|
|
94
|
-
stepsCompleted: [existing_steps]
|
|
95
|
-
session_continued: true
|
|
96
|
-
continuation_date: { { current_date } }
|
|
97
|
-
---
|
|
98
|
-
```
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
✅ Existing session state accurately analyzed and understood
|
|
103
|
-
✅ Seamless continuation without loss of context or rapport
|
|
104
|
-
✅ Appropriate continuation options presented based on progress
|
|
105
|
-
✅ User choice properly routed to next workflow step
|
|
106
|
-
✅ Session continuity maintained throughout interaction
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
## FAILURE MODES:
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
❌ Not properly analyzing existing document state
|
|
111
|
-
❌ Asking user to repeat information already provided
|
|
112
|
-
❌ Losing continuity in session flow or context
|
|
113
|
-
❌ Not providing appropriate continuation options
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
115
|
-
## CONTINUATION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
- Always acknowledge previous work and progress
|
|
118
|
-
- Maintain established rapport and session dynamics
|
|
119
|
-
- Build upon existing ideas and insights rather than starting over
|
|
120
|
-
- Respect user's time by avoiding repetitive questions
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
122
|
-
## NEXT STEP:
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
124
|
-
Route to appropriate workflow step based on user's continuation choice and current session state.
|