bmad-method 6.11.1-next.0 → 6.11.1-next.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/agents/bmad-agent-analyst/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/agents/bmad-agent-architect/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/agents/bmad-agent-dev/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/agents/bmad-agent-pm/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/agents/bmad-agent-ux-designer/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/module-help.csv +16 -16
- package/src/bmm-skills/module.yaml +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-architecture/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-prd/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-prfaq/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-prfaq/bmad-manifest.json +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-product-brief/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-project-context/SKILL.md +4 -4
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-project-context/references/best-practices.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-spec/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-sprint-planning/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-sprint-planning/scripts/__pycache__/sprint_plan.cpython-311.pyc +0 -0
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-sprint-planning/scripts/tests/__pycache__/test_sprint_plan.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-ux/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-build/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-build-auto/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-checkpoint-preview/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-code-review/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-correct-course/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-qa-generate-e2e-tests/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-retrospective/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-retrospective/scripts/__pycache__/sprint_status.cpython-311.pyc +0 -0
- package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-retrospective/scripts/tests/__pycache__/test_git_evidence.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-retrospective/scripts/tests/__pycache__/test_sprint_status.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-create-architecture/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-create-prd/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-create-story/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-dev-auto/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-dev-story/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-domain-research/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-edit-prd/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-market-research/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-quick-dev/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-sprint-status/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-technical-research/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/bmm-skills/v6-shims/bmad-validate-prd/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-advanced-elicitation/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-brainstorming/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-customize/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-deep-recon/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-forge-idea/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-help/SKILL.md +6 -4
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-party-mode/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/bmad-review/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/module-help.csv +3 -3
- package/src/core-skills/v6-shims/bmad-editorial-review/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/v6-shims/bmad-editorial-review-prose/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/v6-shims/bmad-editorial-review-structure/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/v6-shims/bmad-review-adversarial-general/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/v6-shims/bmad-review-edge-case-hunter/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/core-skills/v6-shims/bmad-review-verification-gap/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/src/scripts/__pycache__/config_utils.cpython-311.pyc +0 -0
- package/src/scripts/tests/__pycache__/test_config_utils.cpython-311.pyc +0 -0
- package/src/scripts/tests/__pycache__/test_resolve_config.cpython-311.pyc +0 -0
- package/src/scripts/tests/__pycache__/test_resolve_customization.cpython-311.pyc +0 -0
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-agent-analyst
|
|
3
|
-
description:
|
|
3
|
+
description: Business analyst for market research, competitive analysis, and requirements. Use when the user asks to talk to Mary or requests the business analyst
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Mary — Business Analyst
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-agent-architect
|
|
3
|
-
description: System architect and technical design leader. Use when the user asks to talk to Winston or requests the architect
|
|
3
|
+
description: System architect and technical design leader. Use when the user asks to talk to Winston or requests the architect
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Winston — System Architect
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-agent-dev
|
|
3
|
-
description: Senior software engineer
|
|
3
|
+
description: Senior software engineer who implements stories and code changes. Use when the user asks to talk to Amelia or requests the developer agent
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Amelia — Senior Software Engineer
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-agent-pm
|
|
3
|
-
description: Product manager for PRD creation and requirements discovery. Use when the user asks to talk to John or requests the product manager
|
|
3
|
+
description: Product manager for PRD creation and requirements discovery. Use when the user asks to talk to John or requests the product manager
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# John — Product Manager
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-agent-ux-designer
|
|
3
|
-
description: UX designer and UI specialist. Use when the user asks to talk to Sally or requests the UX designer
|
|
3
|
+
description: UX designer and UI specialist. Use when the user asks to talk to Sally or requests the UX designer
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Sally — UX Designer
|
|
@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
module,skill,display-name,menu-code,description,action,args,phase,preceded-by,followed-by,required,output-location,outputs
|
|
2
2
|
BMad Method,_meta,,,,,,,,,false,https://docs.bmad-method.org/llms.txt,
|
|
3
3
|
BMad Method,bmad-project-context,Project Context,PC,"Set up or refresh a repo's agent instructions so AI agents work well in it: verified commands, policy, conventions that differ from defaults, and known pitfalls. Setup, refresh, record, and audit — replaces document-project and generate-project-context.",,,anytime,,,false,repo root,AGENTS.md managed block
|
|
4
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-build,Build,BD,
|
|
5
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-spec,Spec,SPC,"
|
|
6
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-correct-course,Correct Course,CC,
|
|
7
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-brainstorming,Brainstorm Project,BP,
|
|
8
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-product-brief,Create Brief,CB,
|
|
9
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-prfaq,PRFAQ Challenge,WB,Working Backwards
|
|
10
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-prd,Create Edit and Review PRD,PRD,"
|
|
11
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-ux,Create UX,CU,"
|
|
12
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-architecture,Architecture,CA,Offer once requirements exist (a PRD or spec
|
|
13
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-create-epics-and-stories,Create Epics and Stories,CE
|
|
14
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-sprint-planning,Sprint Planning,SP,
|
|
15
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-sprint-planning,Sprint Status,SS,
|
|
16
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-code-review,Code Review,CR,Ad hoc review of any code change.
|
|
17
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-checkpoint-preview,Checkpoint,CK,Guided walkthrough of a change from purpose and context into details. Use for human review of commits branches or PRs
|
|
18
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-qa-generate-e2e-tests,QA Automation Test,QA,Generate automated API and
|
|
19
|
-
BMad Method,bmad-retrospective,Retrospective,ER,Optional at
|
|
4
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-build,Build,BD,"The standard implementation flow: clarify intent, plan, implement, review, and present.",,,ship,bmad-sprint-planning,bmad-code-review,true,implementation_artifacts,spec and project implementation
|
|
5
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-spec,Spec,SPC,"Condense any input (brief, PRD, transcript, brain dump, design folder, or several sources at once) into a short SPEC.md plus supporting files that later work builds from. Pins down what to build before deciding how. Works for software, game design, research, editorial, policy, business — anything with an intent behind it. Can also validate an existing spec.",,[path],anytime,,,false,{output_folder}/specs/spec-{slug},SPEC.md + companion files
|
|
6
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-correct-course,Correct Course,CC,"Assess a significant mid-sprint change. May recommend starting over, updating the PRD, redoing architecture or sprint planning, or correcting epics and stories.",,,anytime,,,false,planning_artifacts,change proposal
|
|
7
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-brainstorming,Brainstorm Project,BP,Guided idea-generation session using one or more brainstorming techniques.,,,plan,,,false,{output_folder}/brainstorming,brainstorming session
|
|
8
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-product-brief,Create Brief,CB,A guided conversation that captures your product idea in a brief. A gentler alternative to the PRFAQ when you are already committed to your concept.,,-A,plan,,,false,planning_artifacts,product brief
|
|
9
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-prfaq,PRFAQ Challenge,WB,"Amazon's Working Backwards method: write the press release for the finished product first, then answer hard customer and stakeholder questions to test whether the concept holds up. An alternative to the product brief.",,-H,plan,,,false,planning_artifacts,prfaq document
|
|
10
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-prd,Create Edit and Review PRD,PRD,"Create a new PRD through guided discovery, update an existing one when plans change, or validate a finished PRD against a checklist with an HTML findings report.",,,2-planning,bmad-product-brief,,true,planning_artifacts,prd
|
|
11
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-ux,Create UX,CU,"Capture UX decisions into design and experience documents. Strongly recommended when a UI is a major part of the project.",,,2-planning,bmad-prd,,false,planning_artifacts,ux design
|
|
12
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-architecture,Architecture,CA,"Offer once requirements exist (a PRD or spec, plus UX if present) and the user is ready to decide how to build. Also offer any time separately built parts risk becoming inconsistent. Records the architecture decisions that keep features, epics, and stories consistent. Comes before epics and stories; scales from a few key decisions to a full architecture, and can document the conventions of an existing codebase.",,,plan,,,true,planning_artifacts,architecture
|
|
13
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-create-epics-and-stories,Create Epics and Stories,CE,Break the PRD and architecture into epics and user stories with acceptance criteria.,,,plan,bmad-architecture,,true,planning_artifacts,epics and stories
|
|
14
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-sprint-planning,Sprint Planning,SP,"Checks the planning is complete enough to implement (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL), then generates the sprint status file that implementation agents follow for every story.",,,plan,,,true,implementation_artifacts,sprint status
|
|
15
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-sprint-planning,Sprint Status,SS,"Summarize sprint progress at any time: risks, open action items, and the recommended next action. Can also validate or repair the tracking file.",status,,anytime,,,false,,status summary
|
|
16
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-code-review,Code Review,CR,Ad hoc review of any code change. An optional extra check after Build's built-in review.,,,ship,bmad-build,,false,,
|
|
17
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-checkpoint-preview,Checkpoint,CK,"Guided walkthrough of a change, from purpose and context into details. Use for human review of commits, branches, or PRs.",,,ship,,,false,,
|
|
18
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-qa-generate-e2e-tests,QA Automation Test,QA,Generate automated API and end-to-end tests for implemented code. Not for code review or story validation — use Code Review for that.,,,ship,bmad-build,,false,implementation_artifacts,test suite
|
|
19
|
+
BMad Method,bmad-retrospective,Retrospective,ER,"Optional at the end of an epic: review the completed work and lessons learned, and look ahead to the next epic. If major issues surfaced, consider Correct Course.",,,ship,bmad-code-review,,false,implementation_artifacts,retrospective
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-architecture
|
|
3
|
-
description: '
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Work out and record the architecture decisions that keep separately built parts of a system consistent, in a short architecture document. Creates, updates, or validates one; works from a spec, a raw idea, or an existing codebase. Use when the user says "create the architecture", "create technical architecture", "architecture spine", or "create a solution design"'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
# BMad Architecture
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-prd
|
|
3
|
-
description: Create, update, or validate a PRD. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, or validating a PRD
|
|
3
|
+
description: Create, update, or validate a PRD. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, or validating a PRD
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
# BMad PRD
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-prfaq
|
|
3
|
-
description: Working Backwards
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Test a product concept with Amazon's Working Backwards method: write the press release for the finished product first, then answer hard customer and stakeholder questions, ending in a complete PRFAQ document. Use when the user requests to 'create a PRFAQ', 'work backwards', or 'run the PRFAQ challenge'"
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Working Backwards: The PRFAQ Challenge
|
|
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
|
|
4
4
|
{
|
|
5
5
|
"name": "working-backwards",
|
|
6
6
|
"menu-code": "WB",
|
|
7
|
-
"description": "Produces
|
|
7
|
+
"description": "Produces a PRFAQ document and an optional condensed version for use as PRD input.",
|
|
8
8
|
"supports-headless": true,
|
|
9
9
|
"phase-name": "plan",
|
|
10
10
|
"preceded-by": ["brainstorming", "perform-research"],
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-product-brief
|
|
3
|
-
description: Create, update, or validate a product brief. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, or validating a brief
|
|
3
|
+
description: Create, update, or validate a product brief. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, or validating a brief
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Overview
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-project-context
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Set up, refresh, or audit a repository''s agent instructions (the AGENTS.md block) so AI agents work well in that repo. Also records observed agent mistakes as
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Set up, refresh, or audit a repository''s agent instructions (the AGENTS.md block) so AI agents work well in that repo. Also records observed agent mistakes as pitfalls. Must be invoked by name'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Overview
|
|
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ Never commit.
|
|
|
72
72
|
### 6. Close
|
|
73
73
|
|
|
74
74
|
- What went in, and what was left out and why.
|
|
75
|
-
- Why, in the user's terms, from `best-practices.md` — why it is small, why what the repo already states stays out, why a pitfall
|
|
75
|
+
- Why, in the user's terms, from `best-practices.md` — why it is small, why what the repo already states stays out, why a pitfall stays until its cause is gone.
|
|
76
76
|
- How it loads, and that other harness files can point at it.
|
|
77
77
|
- Maintenance: re-run after significant change, `record` the moment an agent gets something wrong, prefer a check over a new line.
|
|
78
78
|
- Rules repeating across their projects, or personal rather than the team's, belong in their global agent config.
|
|
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ If the target has a `project-context.md` from the retired skills, commonly under
|
|
|
91
91
|
|
|
92
92
|
## Record
|
|
93
93
|
|
|
94
|
-
Capture one observed agent mistake as it happens — the only admissible source for a pitfall
|
|
94
|
+
Capture one observed agent mistake as it happens — the only admissible source for a pitfall.
|
|
95
95
|
|
|
96
96
|
Take the task, the mistake, the correction, and its evidence. Check the block for a line already covering it. One occurrence is noted; a recurring or costly mistake earns a line now — an exact invocation under **Running and verifying** when it is a command error, otherwise a pitfall. Write it and show the diff. If it is mechanically preventable, propose the hook, lint rule, or CI check instead.
|
|
97
97
|
|
|
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ Take the task, the mistake, the correction, and its evidence. Check the block fo
|
|
|
99
99
|
|
|
100
100
|
Re-check every caveat, path-check every file, follow every pointer, and ask of every line whether removing it would change agent behavior. Check for contradictions with other instruction files.
|
|
101
101
|
|
|
102
|
-
Failing lines move behind an observable trigger, get fixed, or are deleted — confirm deletions first. **A policy or pitfall
|
|
102
|
+
Failing lines move behind an observable trigger, get fixed, or are deleted — confirm deletions first. **A policy or pitfall goes only when the thing it guards is gone or the user retires it; nothing failing lately is not grounds.** Audit ends smaller or equal.
|
|
103
103
|
|
|
104
104
|
## Children
|
|
105
105
|
|
|
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Prefer prohibitions to advice, and name the permitted alternative in the same li
|
|
|
32
32
|
|
|
33
33
|
## Retire
|
|
34
34
|
|
|
35
|
-
A policy or pitfall
|
|
35
|
+
A policy or pitfall goes only when the thing it guards is gone, or the user retires it. Nothing failing lately is not evidence — a working rule erases its own evidence.
|
|
36
36
|
|
|
37
37
|
Every other line faces one question at each write: would removing it change agent behavior? If no, cut it.
|
|
38
38
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-spec
|
|
3
|
-
description:
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Condense any input — an idea, brief, PRD, transcript, or mixed notes — into a short spec: SPEC.md plus supporting files that downstream skills build from. Also updates and validates existing specs, and can break a spec into stories. Use when the user says "create a spec", "distill this into a spec", "validate this spec", "update the spec", or "break this into stories"'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# BMad Spec
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-sprint-planning
|
|
3
|
-
description: '
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Check that planning is complete enough to implement, then generate the sprint status file from the epics. Can also summarize sprint progress and validate or repair the tracking file. Use when the user says "run sprint planning", "generate sprint plan", "check implementation readiness", "show sprint status", "validate sprint status", or "fix sprint status"'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Overview
|
package/src/bmm-skills/plan/bmad-sprint-planning/scripts/__pycache__/sprint_plan.cpython-311.pyc
CHANGED
|
Binary file
|
|
Binary file
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-ux
|
|
3
|
-
description:
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Capture the user''s UX vision in two documents: DESIGN.md for how the product looks and EXPERIENCE.md for how it behaves. Use when the user says "lets create UX design" or "create UX specifications" or "help me plan the UX"'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
# BMad UX
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-build
|
|
3
|
-
description: '
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Implement any requirement, story, bug fix, or change request as working code that follows the project''s existing architecture, patterns, and conventions. Use when the user wants to build, fix, tweak, refactor, add, or modify any code, component, or feature'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
Run the following command exactly once without changing the current working directory. Replace `{project-root}` with the absolute path to the project root and `{skill-root}` with the absolute path to this skill's directory:
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-build-auto
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'One iteration of an unattended development loop. Use when invoked by name
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'One iteration of an unattended development loop. Use when invoked by name'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
Run the following command exactly once without changing the current working directory. Replace `{project-root}` with the absolute path to the project root and `{skill-root}` with the absolute path to this skill's directory:
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-checkpoint-preview
|
|
3
|
-
description: '
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Walk the user through reviewing a change: what it is for, what to look at closely, and how to test it. Use when the user says "checkpoint", "human review", or "walk me through this change"'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Checkpoint Review Workflow
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-code-review
|
|
3
|
-
description: '
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Review code changes with several independent reviewers in parallel, then triage and present the findings. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Code Review Workflow
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-correct-course
|
|
3
|
-
description: '
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Assess the impact of a significant change during sprint execution across the PRD, epics, architecture, and UX documents, and produce a sprint change proposal. Use when the user says "correct course" or "propose sprint change"'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Correct Course - Sprint Change Management Workflow
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-qa-generate-e2e-tests
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Generate
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Generate automated API and end-to-end tests for implemented features. Use when the user says "create qa automated tests for [feature]"'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# QA Generate E2E Tests Workflow
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-retrospective
|
|
3
|
-
description: '
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Review a completed epic against the evidence it left behind — spec, stories, diffs, commits, sprint status — and produce a retrospective with sourced findings, action items, and an acceptance decision. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]". Supports -H/--headless'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Retrospective
|
package/src/bmm-skills/ship/bmad-retrospective/scripts/__pycache__/sprint_status.cpython-311.pyc
CHANGED
|
Binary file
|
|
Binary file
|
|
Binary file
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-create-story
|
|
3
|
-
description: "Deprecated: `bmad-build` is now the official implementation method. Only use this when explicitly invoked by name
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Deprecated: `bmad-build` is now the official implementation method. Only use this when explicitly invoked by name"
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Create Story Workflow
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-dev-story
|
|
3
|
-
description: "Deprecated: `bmad-build` is now the official implementation method. Only use this when explicitly invoked by name
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Deprecated: `bmad-build` is now the official implementation method. Only use this when explicitly invoked by name"
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Dev Story Workflow
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-advanced-elicitation
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Advanced Elicitation
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-brainstorming
|
|
3
|
-
description: Facilitate a brainstorming session using diverse creative techniques. Use when the user says 'help me brainstorm' or 'help me ideate'
|
|
3
|
+
description: Facilitate a brainstorming session using diverse creative techniques. Use when the user says 'help me brainstorm' or 'help me ideate'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# BMad Brainstorming
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-customize
|
|
3
|
-
description: Authors and updates customization overrides for installed BMad skills. Use when the user says 'customize bmad', 'override a skill', 'change agent behavior', or 'customize a workflow'
|
|
3
|
+
description: Authors and updates customization overrides for installed BMad skills. Use when the user says 'customize bmad', 'override a skill', 'change agent behavior', or 'customize a workflow'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# BMad Customize
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-deep-recon
|
|
3
|
-
description: '
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Research a topic to support a decision, three ways: draft a research prompt for the user to run in their own tool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, …), turn a finished research report into a short summary with cited sources that other skills can use directly, or run the research here with parallel web searches. Built-in research types: market, domain, technical, competitive, user-voice, academic-lit; also supports choosing between candidates, and custom types via overrides. Use when the user says "deep recon", "research this", "draft a research prompt", "process this research report", "market research", "domain research", "technical research", "competitor research", "literature review", or "help me choose between"'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# BMad Deep Recon
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-forge-idea
|
|
3
|
-
description:
|
|
3
|
+
description: Test a half-formed idea in a questioning conversation, with different personas probing its weak points, until the user can act on it or drop it with confidence. Optionally writes a short brief for planning skills to build on. Use when the user says 'forge an idea', 'pressure-test this idea', 'stress-test my thinking', or 'harden this idea'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# BMad Forge Idea
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-help
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Analyzes current state and user query to answer BMad questions or recommend the next skill(s) to use. Use when user asks for help, bmad help, what to do next, or what to start with in BMad
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Analyzes current state and user query to answer BMad questions or recommend the next skill(s) to use. Use when user asks for help, bmad help, what to do next, or what to start with in BMad'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# BMad Help
|
|
@@ -50,9 +50,11 @@ module,skill,display-name,menu-code,description,action,args,phase,preceded-by,fo
|
|
|
50
50
|
- A phase with no required items is entirely optional — recommend it but be clear about what's actually required next
|
|
51
51
|
|
|
52
52
|
**Completion detection**:
|
|
53
|
-
- Search resolved output paths for `outputs` patterns
|
|
54
|
-
-
|
|
55
|
-
-
|
|
53
|
+
- Search resolved output paths for `outputs` patterns and fuzzy-match found files to catalog rows
|
|
54
|
+
- Treat a matching output as evidence that the skill started, not that it completed
|
|
55
|
+
- Inspect matched artifacts for explicit completion evidence, such as final status or finalization markers; a draft or incomplete marker means the skill is still in progress
|
|
56
|
+
- Honor completion stated by the user or established in the current conversation
|
|
57
|
+
- When completion cannot be determined reliably, say so and ask the user; do not recommend advancing based on file presence alone
|
|
56
58
|
|
|
57
59
|
**Descriptions carry routing context** — some contain cycle info and alternate paths (e.g., "back to DS if fixes needed"). Read them as navigation hints, not just display text.
|
|
58
60
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-party-mode
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Orchestrates lively group discussions between installed BMAD agents or custom personas, and helps author custom parties. Use when the user requests party mode, a roundtable, or multiple agent perspectives — or wants to create/configure a party, define personas, or build an AI focus-group panel
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Orchestrates lively group discussions between installed BMAD agents or custom personas, and helps author custom parties. Use when the user requests party mode, a roundtable, or multiple agent perspectives — or wants to create/configure a party, define personas, or build an AI focus-group panel'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Party Mode
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-review
|
|
3
|
-
description: '
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Review any diff, document, spec, or other artifact with one or more installed review methods (lenses) — shipped ones cover adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, document structure, and prose. Runs whichever fit the content, or exactly the ones asked for. Use when the user says "review this", "critical review", "editorial review", "hunt edge cases", "review the structure", or "review the prose"'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# BMad Review
|
|
@@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ Core,bmad-party-mode,Party Mode,PM,Orchestrate multi-agent discussions when you
|
|
|
5
5
|
Core,bmad-help,BMad Help,BH,,,,anytime,,,false,,
|
|
6
6
|
Core,bmad-customize,BMad Customize,BC,"Use when you want to change how an agent or workflow behaves — add persistent facts, swap templates, insert activation hooks, or customize menus. Scans what's customizable, picks the right scope (agent vs workflow), writes the override to _bmad/custom/, and verifies the merge. No TOML hand-authoring required.",,,anytime,,,false,{project-root}/_bmad/custom,TOML override files
|
|
7
7
|
Core,bmad-advanced-elicitation,Advanced Elicitation,AE,"Use at any checkpoint to push a just-produced draft, section, or plan past its first version — pick from a menu of elicitation methods (pre-mortem, first principles, red team, socratic) and apply the improvements.",,,anytime,,,false,,
|
|
8
|
-
Core,bmad-review,Review,RV,"
|
|
9
|
-
Core,bmad-forge-idea,Forge Idea,FI,"
|
|
10
|
-
Core,bmad-deep-recon,Deep Recon,RS,
|
|
8
|
+
Core,bmad-review,Review,RV,"Review anything before it ships: a diff, branch, or uncommitted changes; a PRD, spec, story, or architecture document; any prose. Applies whichever installed review methods (lenses) fit the content — shipped ones cover adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, document structure, and prose editing — or exactly the ones you name. Code Review in other modules calls it automatically.",,[path],anytime,,,false,,findings JSON array + markdown report
|
|
9
|
+
Core,bmad-forge-idea,Forge Idea,FI,"Test an idea — software, business, creative, research, or personal — through probing questions from different personas until you can act on it or drop it with confidence. Can hand the result to bmad-spec or bmad-build.",,,anytime,,,false,{output_folder}/forge,refined-idea brief (optional)
|
|
10
|
+
Core,bmad-deep-recon,Deep Recon,RS,"Research a topic to support a decision: draft a research prompt for your own AI tool and turn the returned report into a summary with cited sources, or run the research directly here with web searches. Types: market, domain, technical, competitive, user-voice, academic-lit, plus choosing between candidates; custom types via overrides.",,[type],anytime,,,false,{planning_artifacts}/research,research report/summary + optional html briefing
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-editorial-review
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
Merged into `bmad-review`. Invoke the `bmad-review` skill on the same content with the `structure` and `prose` lenses — both, structure first, so prose runs on top of the structure findings — unless the caller asked for a structure-only or prose-only review, in which case pass only that lens. Pass through any `also_consider` areas, and forward this skill's resolved `[workflow]` fields as pre-resolved values — but only those that resolved to something, since an empty value here means no legacy override exists and bmad-review's own default should stand: `reader_type`, `style_guide`, `review_guidance`, `output_preferences`, `persistent_facts`, `activation_steps_prepend`, `activation_steps_append`, `on_complete`, and `review_output_path` as the report path. Present the findings in the legacy shape: the two-pass findings table `| Pass | Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |` with the purpose/audience read above it and, when the structure pass ran, the reduction summary below it — and no other lens's output.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-editorial-review-prose
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
Merged into `bmad-review`. Invoke the `bmad-review` skill on the same content with only the `prose` lens, passing through the same inputs and any `also_consider` areas. Present the findings in the legacy shape: a three-column markdown table `| Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |` — no Pass column, no preamble above the table. If no issues are found, output exactly: `No editorial issues identified`.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-editorial-review-structure
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
Merged into `bmad-review`. Invoke the `bmad-review` skill on the same content with only the `structure` lens, passing through the same inputs and any `also_consider` areas. Present the findings in the legacy report shape: a `## Document Summary` block (purpose, audience, reader type, structure model, current length), a `## Recommendations` list of numbered `[CUT/MERGE/MOVE/CONDENSE/QUESTION/PRESERVE]` entries each with rationale and word impact, and a closing `## Summary` (total recommendations, estimated reduction) — not the findings table. If no structural issues are found, output exactly: `No substantive changes recommended`.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-review-adversarial-general
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
Merged into `bmad-review`. Invoke the `bmad-review` skill on the same content with only the `adversarial` lens, passing through any `also_consider` areas. Present the findings as a Markdown list — descriptions only, no severity, priority, or ranking; no JSON block.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-review-edge-case-hunter
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
Merged into `bmad-review`. Invoke the `bmad-review` skill on the same content with only the `edge-case-hunter` lens, passing through any `also_consider` areas. Output ONLY the raw findings JSON array in the legacy shape: the four standard fields (plus `kind`/`confidence` on deletion findings), no `lens` field, no markdown wrapping, no extra text. `[]` is valid when nothing is found.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: bmad-review-verification-gap
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review'
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
Merged into `bmad-review`. Invoke the `bmad-review` skill on the same content with only the `verification-gap` lens. Present the markdown rendering only (no JSON block), listing any `gap_shape: "other"` findings under an `## Other findings` heading. When there are no findings at all, output exactly this single line: `No verification gaps found.`
|
|
Binary file
|
|
Binary file
|
|
Binary file
|
|
Binary file
|