bmad-method 6.0.0-alpha.4 → 6.0.0-alpha.6

package/bmad/bmm/tasks/retrospective.xml

@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
-<task id="bmad/bmm/tasks/retrospective.xml" name="Team Retrospective">
-  <llm critical="true">
-    <i>MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER</i>
-    <i>DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence</i>
-    <i>HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met</i>
-    <i>Each andlt;actionandgt; within andlt;stepandgt; is a REQUIRED action to complete that step</i>
-    <i>Sections outside flow (validation, output, critical-context) provide essential context - review and apply throughout execution</i>
-  </llm>
-  <flow>
-    <step n="1" title="Epic Context Discovery">
-      <action>Check {project-root}{output_folder}/stories/ for highest completed story</action>
-      <action>Extract epic number from story (e.g., "Epic: 003")</action>
-      <action>Read epic from {project-root}{output_folder}/prd/epic{number}.md</action>
-      <action>List all stories for this epic in {project-root}{output_folder}/stories/</action>
-      <action>Check completion status of each story</action>
-      <action>Extract key metrics (velocity, blockers encountered)</action>
-      <action>Review epic goals and success criteria</action>
-      <action>Compare actual outcomes vs. planned</action>
-      <action>Note technical debt incurred</action>
-      <action>Document architectural decisions made</action>
-    </step>
-
-    <step n="2" title="Preview Next Epic">
-      <action>Read next epic from d{project-root}{output_folder}/prd/epic{next-number}.md</action>
-      <action>Identify dependencies on completed work</action>
-      <action>Note potential gaps or preparation needed</action>
-      <action>Check for technical prerequisites</action>
-    </step>
-
-    <step n="3" title="Initialize Retrospective with Context">
-      <output>
-        🔄 TEAM RETROSPECTIVE - Epic {{number}}: {{Epic Name}}
-
-        Bob (Scrum Master) facilitating
-
-        Epic Summary:
-        - Completed: {{completed}}/{{total}} stories ({{percentage}}%)
-        - Velocity: {{actual-points}} story points (planned: {{planned-points}})
-        - Duration: {{actual-sprints}} sprints (planned: {{planned-sprints}})
-        - Technical Debt: {{debt-items}}
-
-        Next Epic Preview: Epic {{next-number}}: {{Next Epic Name}}
-        - Dependencies on Epic {{number}}: {{dependencies}}
-        - Preparation needed: {{preparation-gaps}}
-
-        Team assembled for reflection:
-        {{agents-based-on-story-records}}
-
-        Focus: Learning from Epic {{number}} and preparing for Epic {{next-number}}
-      </output>
-    </step>
-
-    <step n="4" title="Epic Review Discussion">
-      <action>Each agent shares referencing actual story data</action>
-      <action>What Went Well: Successes from completed stories, effective practices, velocity achievements</action>
-      <action>What Could Improve: Challenges from story records, blockers that slowed progress, technical debt incurred</action>
-      <action>Lessons Learned: Key insights for future epics, patterns to repeat or avoid</action>
-    </step>
-
-    <step n="5" title="Next Epic Preparation Discussion">
-      <action>Each agent addresses preparation needs</action>
-      <action>Dependencies Check: What from completed epic is needed for next epic, any incomplete blocking work</action>
-      <action>Preparation Needs: Technical setup required, knowledge gaps to fill, refactoring needed</action>
-      <action>Risk Assessment: Potential issues based on experience, mitigation strategies</action>
-    </step>
-
-    <step n="6" title="Synthesize Action Items">
-      <action>Bob identifies patterns across feedback</action>
-      <action>Synthesizes into team agreements</action>
-      <action>Assigns ownership to action items</action>
-      <action>Creates preparation sprint tasks if needed</action>
-      <output>
-        📝 EPIC {{number}} ACTION ITEMS:
-        {{numbered-action-items-with-owners}}
-
-        🚀 EPIC {{next-number}} PREPARATION SPRINT:
-        {{preparation-tasks-with-timeline}}
-
-        ⚠️ CRITICAL PATH:
-        {{critical-dependencies-and-timeline}}
-      </output>
-    </step>
-
-    <step n="7" title="Critical User Verification">
-      <validation>
-        <i>Testing Verification: Has full regression testing been completed?</i>
-        <i>Deployment Status: Has epic been deployed to production?</i>
-        <i>Business Validation: Have stakeholders reviewed and accepted deliverables?</i>
-        <i>Technical Health: Is codebase in stable, maintainable state?</i>
-        <i>Final Checks: Any unresolved blockers that will impact next epic?</i>
-      </validation>
-    </step>
-  </flow>
-
-  <llm critical="true">
-    <i>This task extends party-mode with retrospective-specific structure</i>
-    <i>Bob (Scrum Master) facilitates the discussion ensuring psychological safety</i>
-    <i>No blame, focus on systems and processes</i>
-    <i>Everyone contributes with specific examples preferred</i>
-    <i>Action items must be achievable with clear ownership</i>
-    <i>End with team agreements and clear next steps</i>
-    <i>Two-part format: Epic Review + Next Epic Preparation</i>
-  </llm>
-</task>

package/bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/brainstorm-project/README.md

@@ -1,113 +0,0 @@
-# Project Brainstorming Workflow
-
-Structured ideation for software projects exploring problem spaces, architectures, and innovative solutions beyond traditional requirements gathering.
-
-## Table of Contents
-
-- [Purpose](#purpose)
-- [Usage](#usage)
-- [Process](#process)
-- [Inputs & Outputs](#inputs--outputs)
-- [Integration](#integration)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Generate multiple solution approaches for software projects through:
-
-- Parallel ideation tracks (architecture, UX, integration, value delivery)
-- Technical-business alignment from inception
-- Hidden assumption discovery
-- Innovation beyond obvious solutions
-
-## Usage
-
-```bash
-# Run brainstorming session
-bmad bmm *brainstorm-project
-
-# Or via Analyst agent
-*brainstorm-project
-```
-
-## Process
-
-### 1. Context Capture
-
-- Business objectives and constraints
-- Technical environment
-- Stakeholder needs
-- Success criteria
-
-### 2. Parallel Ideation
-
-- **Architecture Track**: Technical approaches with trade-offs
-- **UX Track**: Interface paradigms and user journeys
-- **Integration Track**: System connection patterns
-- **Value Track**: Feature prioritization and delivery
-
-### 3. Solution Synthesis
-
-- Evaluate feasibility and impact
-- Align with strategic objectives
-- Surface hidden assumptions
-- Generate recommendations
-
-## Inputs & Outputs
-
-### Inputs
-
-| Input             | Type     | Purpose                                       |
-| ----------------- | -------- | --------------------------------------------- |
-| Project Context   | Document | Business objectives, environment, constraints |
-| Problem Statement | Optional | Core challenge or opportunity                 |
-
-### Outputs
-
-| Output                   | Content                                     |
-| ------------------------ | ------------------------------------------- |
-| Architecture Proposals   | Multiple approaches with trade-off analysis |
-| Value Framework          | Prioritized features aligned to objectives  |
-| Risk Analysis            | Dependencies, challenges, opportunities     |
-| Strategic Recommendation | Synthesized direction with rationale        |
-
-## Integration
-
-### Workflow Chain
-
-1. **brainstorm-project** ← Current step
-2. research (optional deep dive)
-3. product-brief (strategic document)
-4. Phase 2 planning (PRD/tech-spec)
-
-### Feed Into
-
-- Product Brief development
-- Architecture decisions
-- PRD requirements
-- Epic prioritization
-
-## Best Practices
-
-1. **Prepare context** - Gather business and technical background
-2. **Think broadly** - Explore non-obvious approaches
-3. **Document assumptions** - Capture implicit beliefs
-4. **Consider constraints** - Technical, organizational, resource
-5. **Focus on value** - Align to business objectives
-
-## Configuration
-
-```yaml
-# bmad/bmm/config.yaml
-output_folder: ./output
-project_name: Your Project
-```
-
-## Related Workflows
-
-- [Research](../research/README.md) - Deep investigation
-- [Product Brief](../product-brief/README.md) - Strategic planning
-- [PRD](../../2-plan-workflows/prd/README.md) - Requirements document
-
----
-
-Part of BMad Method v6 - Phase 1 Analysis workflows

package/bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/product-brief/README.md

@@ -1,180 +0,0 @@
-# Product Brief Workflow
-
-## Overview
-
-Interactive product brief creation workflow that guides users through defining their product vision with multiple input sources and conversational collaboration. Supports both structured interactive mode and rapid "YOLO" mode for quick draft generation.
-
-## Key Features
-
-- **Dual Mode Operation** - Interactive step-by-step or rapid draft generation
-- **Multi-Input Support** - Integrates market research, competitive analysis, and brainstorming results
-- **Conversational Design** - Guides users through strategic thinking with probing questions
-- **Executive Summary Generation** - Creates compelling summaries for stakeholder communication
-- **Comprehensive Coverage** - Addresses all critical product planning dimensions
-- **Stakeholder Ready** - Generates professional briefs suitable for PM handoff
-
-## Usage
-
-### Basic Invocation
-
-```bash
-workflow product-brief
-```
-
-### With Input Documents
-
-```bash
-# With market research
-workflow product-brief --input market-research.md
-
-# With multiple inputs
-workflow product-brief --input market-research.md --input competitive-analysis.md
-```
-
-### Configuration
-
-- **brief_format**: "comprehensive" (full detail) or "executive" (3-page limit)
-- **autonomous**: false (requires user collaboration)
-- **output_folder**: Location for generated brief
-
-## Workflow Structure
-
-### Files Included
-
-```
-product-brief/
-├── workflow.yaml           # Configuration and metadata
-├── instructions.md         # Interactive workflow steps
-├── template.md            # Product brief document structure
-├── checklist.md           # Validation criteria
-└── README.md              # This file
-```
-
-## Workflow Process
-
-### Phase 1: Initialization and Context (Steps 0-2)
-
-- **Project Setup**: Captures project name and basic context
-- **Input Gathering**: Collects and analyzes available documents
-- **Mode Selection**: Chooses interactive or YOLO collaboration approach
-- **Context Extraction**: Identifies core problems and opportunities
-
-### Phase 2: Interactive Development (Steps 3-12) - Interactive Mode
-
-- **Problem Definition**: Deep dive into user pain points and market gaps
-- **Solution Articulation**: Develops clear value proposition and approach
-- **User Segmentation**: Defines primary and secondary target audiences
-- **Success Metrics**: Establishes measurable goals and KPIs
-- **MVP Scoping**: Ruthlessly defines minimum viable features
-- **Financial Planning**: Assesses ROI and strategic alignment
-- **Technical Context**: Captures platform and technology considerations
-- **Risk Assessment**: Identifies constraints, assumptions, and unknowns
-
-### Phase 3: Rapid Generation (Steps 3-4) - YOLO Mode
-
-- **Complete Draft**: Generates full brief based on initial context
-- **Iterative Refinement**: User-guided section improvements
-- **Quality Validation**: Ensures completeness and consistency
-
-### Phase 4: Finalization (Steps 13-15)
-
-- **Executive Summary**: Creates compelling overview for stakeholders
-- **Supporting Materials**: Compiles research summaries and references
-- **Final Review**: Quality check and handoff preparation
-
-## Output
-
-### Generated Files
-
-- **Primary output**: product-brief-{project_name}-{date}.md
-- **Supporting files**: Research summaries and stakeholder input documentation
-
-### Output Structure
-
-1. **Executive Summary** - High-level product concept and value proposition
-2. **Problem Statement** - Detailed problem analysis with evidence
-3. **Proposed Solution** - Core approach and key differentiators
-4. **Target Users** - Primary and secondary user segments with personas
-5. **Goals and Success Metrics** - Business objectives and measurable KPIs
-6. **MVP Scope** - Must-have features and out-of-scope items
-7. **Post-MVP Vision** - Phase 2 features and long-term roadmap
-8. **Financial Impact** - Investment requirements and ROI projections
-9. **Strategic Alignment** - Connection to company OKRs and initiatives
-10. **Technical Considerations** - Platform requirements and preferences
-11. **Constraints and Assumptions** - Resource limits and key assumptions
-12. **Risks and Open Questions** - Risk assessment and research needs
-13. **Supporting Materials** - Research summaries and references
-
-## Requirements
-
-No special requirements - designed to work with or without existing documentation.
-
-## Best Practices
-
-### Before Starting
-
-1. **Gather Available Research**: Collect any market research, competitive analysis, or user feedback
-2. **Define Stakeholder Audience**: Know who will use this brief for decision-making
-3. **Set Time Boundaries**: Interactive mode requires 60-90 minutes for quality results
-
-### During Execution
-
-1. **Be Specific**: Avoid generic statements - provide concrete examples and data
-2. **Think Strategically**: Focus on "why" and "what" rather than "how"
-3. **Challenge Assumptions**: Use the conversation to test and refine your thinking
-4. **Scope Ruthlessly**: Resist feature creep in MVP definition
-
-### After Completion
-
-1. **Validate with Checklist**: Use included criteria to ensure completeness
-2. **Stakeholder Review**: Share executive summary first, then full brief
-3. **Iterate Based on Feedback**: Product briefs should evolve with new insights
-
-## Troubleshooting
-
-### Common Issues
-
-**Issue**: Brief lacks specificity or contains vague statements
-
-- **Solution**: Restart problem definition with concrete examples and measurable impacts
-- **Check**: Ensure each section answers "so what?" and provides actionable insights
-
-**Issue**: MVP scope is too large or undefined
-
-- **Solution**: Use the "what's the minimum to validate core hypothesis?" filter
-- **Check**: Verify that each MVP feature is truly essential for initial value delivery
-
-**Issue**: Missing strategic context or business justification
-
-- **Solution**: Return to financial impact and strategic alignment sections
-- **Check**: Ensure connection to company goals and clear ROI potential
-
-## Customization
-
-To customize this workflow:
-
-1. **Modify Questions**: Update instructions.md to add industry-specific or company-specific prompts
-2. **Adjust Template**: Customize template.md sections for organizational brief standards
-3. **Add Validation**: Extend checklist.md with company-specific quality criteria
-4. **Configure Modes**: Adjust brief_format settings for different output styles
-
-## Version History
-
-- **v6.0.0** - Interactive conversational design with dual modes
-  - Interactive and YOLO mode support
-  - Multi-input document integration
-  - Executive summary generation
-  - Strategic alignment focus
-
-## Support
-
-For issues or questions:
-
-- Review the workflow creation guide at `/bmad/bmb/workflows/create-workflow/workflow-creation-guide.md`
-- Validate output using `checklist.md`
-- Consider running market research workflow first if lacking business context
-- Consult BMAD documentation for product planning methodology
-
----
-
-_Part of the BMad Method v6 - BMM (Method) Module_