bmad-method 6.0.0-alpha.12 → 6.0.0-alpha.14

package/src/modules/bmb/workflows/edit-workflow/steps/step-01-analyze.md

@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+---
+name: 'step-01-analyze'
+description: 'Load and deeply understand the target workflow'
+
+# Path Definitions
+workflow_path: '{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/bmb/workflows/edit-workflow'
+
+# File References
+thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-01-analyze.md'
+nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-02-discover.md'
+workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
+outputFile: '{output_folder}/workflow-edit-{target_workflow_name}.md'
+
+# Template References
+analysisTemplate: '{workflow_path}/templates/workflow-analysis.md'
+---
+
+# Step 1: Workflow Analysis
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+To load and deeply understand the target workflow, including its structure, purpose, and potential improvement areas.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a workflow editor and improvement specialist
+- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
+- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
+- ✅ You bring workflow analysis expertise and best practices knowledge
+- ✅ User brings their workflow context and improvement needs
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Focus ONLY on analysis and understanding, not editing yet
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to suggest specific changes in this step
+- 💬 Ask questions to understand the workflow path
+- 🚪 DETECT if this is a new format (standalone) or old format workflow
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Analyze workflow thoroughly and systematically
+- 💾 Document analysis findings in {outputFile}
+- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading next step
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until user selects 'C' and analysis is complete
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- User provides the workflow path to analyze
+- Load all workflow documentation for reference
+- Focus on understanding current state, not improvements yet
+- This is about discovery and analysis
+
+## WORKFLOW ANALYSIS PROCESS:
+
+### 1. Get Workflow Information
+
+Ask the user:
+"I need two pieces of information to help you edit your workflow effectively:
+
+1. **What is the path to the workflow you want to edit?**
+   - Path to workflow.md file (new format)
+   - Path to workflow.yaml file (legacy format)
+   - Path to the workflow directory
+   - Module and workflow name (e.g., 'bmb/workflows/create-workflow')
+
+2. **What do you want to edit or improve in this workflow?**
+   - Briefly describe what you want to achieve
+   - Are there specific issues you've encountered?
+   - Any user feedback you've received?
+   - New features you want to add?
+
+This will help me focus my analysis on what matters most to you."
+
+### 2. Load Workflow Files
+
+Load the target workflow completely:
+
+- workflow.md (or workflow.yaml for old format)
+- steps/ directory with all step files
+- templates/ directory (if exists)
+- data/ directory (if exists)
+- Any additional referenced files
+
+### 3. Determine Workflow Format
+
+Detect if this is:
+
+- **New standalone format**: workflow.md with steps/ subdirectory
+- **Legacy XML format**: workflow.yaml with instructions.md
+- **Mixed format**: Partial migration
+
+### 4. Focused Analysis
+
+Analyze the workflow with attention to the user's stated goals:
+
+#### Initial Goal-Focused Analysis
+
+Based on what the user wants to edit:
+
+- If **user experience issues**: Focus on step clarity, menu patterns, instruction style
+- If **functional problems**: Focus on broken references, missing files, logic errors
+- If **new features**: Focus on integration points, extensibility, structure
+- If **compliance issues**: Focus on best practices, standards, validation
+
+#### Structure Analysis
+
+- Identify workflow type (document, action, interactive, autonomous, meta)
+- Count and examine all steps
+- Map out step flow and dependencies
+- Check for proper frontmatter in all files
+
+#### Content Analysis
+
+- Understand purpose and user journey
+- Evaluate instruction style (intent-based vs prescriptive)
+- Review menu patterns and user interaction points
+- Check variable consistency across files
+
+#### Compliance Analysis
+
+Load reference documentation as needed:
+
+- `{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/bmb/docs/workflows/architecture.md`
+- `{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/step-template.md`
+- `{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/workflow-template.md`
+
+Check against best practices:
+
+- Step file size and structure
+- Menu handling implementation
+- Frontmatter variable usage
+- Path reference consistency
+
+### 5. Present Analysis Findings
+
+Share your analysis with the user in a conversational way:
+
+- What this workflow accomplishes (purpose and value)
+- How it's structured (type, steps, interaction pattern)
+- Format type (new standalone vs legacy)
+- Initial findings related to their stated goals
+- Potential issues or opportunities in their focus area
+
+### 6. Confirm Understanding and Refine Focus
+
+Ask:
+"Based on your goal to {{userGoal}}, I've noticed {{initialFindings}}.
+Does this align with what you were expecting? Are there other areas you'd like me to focus on in my analysis?"
+
+This allows the user to:
+
+- Confirm you're on the right track
+- Add or modify focus areas
+- Clarify any misunderstandings before proceeding
+
+### 7. Final Confirmation
+
+Ask: "Does this analysis cover what you need to move forward with editing?"
+
+## CONTENT TO APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
+
+After analysis, append to {outputFile}:
+
+Load and append the content from {analysisTemplate}
+
+### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS
+
+Display: **Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue
+
+#### EXECUTION RULES:
+
+- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
+- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
+- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
+- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
+- Use menu handling logic section below
+
+#### Menu Handling Logic:
+
+- IF A: Execute {advancedElicitationTask}
+- IF P: Execute {partyModeWorkflow}
+- IF C: Save analysis to {outputFile}, update frontmatter, then only then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
+- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#7-present-menu-options)
+
+## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
+
+ONLY WHEN C is selected and analysis is saved to document and frontmatter is updated, will you then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile} to execute and begin improvement discovery step.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Target workflow loaded completely
+- Analysis performed systematically
+- Findings documented clearly
+- User confirms understanding
+- Analysis saved to {outputFile}
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipping analysis steps
+- Not loading all workflow files
+- Making suggestions without understanding
+- Not saving analysis findings
+
+**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.

package/src/modules/bmb/workflows/edit-workflow/steps/step-02-discover.md

@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+---
+name: 'step-02-discover'
+description: 'Discover improvement goals collaboratively'
+
+# Path Definitions
+workflow_path: '{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/bmb/workflows/edit-workflow'
+
+# File References
+thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-02-discover.md'
+nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-03-improve.md'
+workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
+outputFile: '{output_folder}/workflow-edit-{target_workflow_name}.md'
+
+# Task References
+advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation.xml'
+partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
+
+# Template References
+goalsTemplate: '{workflow_path}/templates/improvement-goals.md'
+---
+
+# Step 2: Discover Improvement Goals
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+To collaboratively discover what the user wants to improve and why, before diving into any edits.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a workflow editor and improvement specialist
+- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
+- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
+- ✅ You guide discovery with thoughtful questions
+- ✅ User brings their context, feedback, and goals
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Focus ONLY on understanding improvement goals
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to suggest specific solutions yet
+- 💬 Ask open-ended questions to understand needs
+- 🚪 ORGANIZE improvements by priority and impact
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Guide collaborative discovery conversation
+- 💾 Document goals in {outputFile}
+- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]` before loading next step
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until user selects 'C' and goals are documented
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Analysis from step 1 is available and informs discovery
+- Focus areas identified in step 1 guide deeper exploration
+- Focus on WHAT to improve and WHY
+- Don't discuss HOW to improve yet
+- This is about detailed needs assessment, not solution design
+
+## DISCOVERY PROCESS:
+
+### 1. Understand Motivation
+
+Engage in collaborative discovery with open-ended questions:
+
+"What prompted you to want to edit this workflow?"
+
+Listen for:
+
+- User feedback they've received
+- Issues they've encountered
+- New requirements that emerged
+- Changes in user needs or context
+
+### 2. Explore User Experience
+
+Ask about how users interact with the workflow:
+
+"What feedback have you gotten from users running this workflow?"
+
+Probe for:
+
+- Confusing steps or unclear instructions
+- Points where users get stuck
+- Repetitive or tedious parts
+- Missing guidance or context
+- Friction in the user journey
+
+### 3. Assess Current Performance
+
+Discuss effectiveness:
+
+"Is the workflow achieving its intended outcome?"
+
+Explore:
+
+- Are users successful with this workflow?
+- What are the success/failure rates?
+- Where do most users drop off?
+- Are there quality issues with outputs?
+
+### 4. Identify Growth Opportunities
+
+Ask about future needs:
+
+"Are there new capabilities you want to add?"
+
+Consider:
+
+- New features or steps
+- Integration with other workflows
+- Expanded use cases
+- Enhanced flexibility
+
+### 5. Evaluate Instruction Style
+
+Discuss communication approach:
+
+"How is the instruction style working for your users?"
+
+Explore:
+
+- Is it too rigid or too loose?
+- Should certain steps be more adaptive?
+- Do some steps need more specificity?
+- Does the style match the workflow's purpose?
+
+### 6. Dive Deeper into Focus Areas
+
+Based on the focus areas identified in step 1, explore more deeply:
+
+#### For User Experience Issues
+
+"Let's explore the user experience issues you mentioned:
+
+- Which specific steps feel clunky or confusing?
+- At what points do users get stuck?
+- What kind of guidance would help them most?"
+
+#### For Functional Problems
+
+"Tell me more about the functional issues:
+
+- When do errors occur?
+- What specific functionality isn't working?
+- Are these consistent issues or intermittent?"
+
+#### For New Features
+
+"Let's detail the new features you want:
+
+- What should these features accomplish?
+- How should users interact with them?
+- Are there examples of similar workflows to reference?"
+
+#### For Compliance Issues
+
+"Let's understand the compliance concerns:
+
+- Which best practices need addressing?
+- Are there specific standards to meet?
+- What validation would be most valuable?"
+
+### 7. Organize Improvement Opportunities
+
+Based on their responses and your analysis, organize improvements:
+
+**CRITICAL Issues** (blocking successful runs):
+
+- Broken references or missing files
+- Unclear or confusing instructions
+- Missing essential functionality
+
+**IMPORTANT Improvements** (enhancing user experience):
+
+- Streamlining step flow
+- Better guidance and context
+- Improved error handling
+
+**NICE-TO-HAVE Enhancements** (for polish):
+
+- Additional validation
+- Better documentation
+- Performance optimizations
+
+### 8. Prioritize Collaboratively
+
+Work with the user to prioritize:
+"Looking at all these opportunities, which ones matter most to you right now?"
+
+Help them consider:
+
+- Impact on users
+- Effort to implement
+- Dependencies between improvements
+- Timeline constraints
+
+## CONTENT TO APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
+
+After discovery, append to {outputFile}:
+
+Load and append the content from {goalsTemplate}
+
+### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS
+
+Display: **Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue
+
+#### EXECUTION RULES:
+
+- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
+- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
+- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
+- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
+- Use menu handling logic section below
+
+#### Menu Handling Logic:
+
+- IF A: Execute {advancedElicitationTask}
+- IF P: Execute {partyModeWorkflow}
+- IF C: Save goals to {outputFile}, update frontmatter, then only then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
+- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#8-present-menu-options)
+
+## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
+
+ONLY WHEN C is selected and goals are saved to document and frontmatter is updated, will you then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile} to execute and begin collaborative improvement step.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- User improvement goals clearly understood
+- Issues and opportunities identified
+- Priorities established collaboratively
+- Goals documented in {outputFile}
+- User ready to proceed with improvements
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipping discovery dialogue
+- Making assumptions about user needs
+- Not documenting discovered goals
+- Rushing to solutions without understanding
+
+**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.

package/src/modules/bmb/workflows/edit-workflow/steps/step-03-improve.md

@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+---
+name: 'step-03-improve'
+description: 'Facilitate collaborative improvements to the workflow'
+
+# Path Definitions
+workflow_path: '{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/bmb/workflows/edit-workflow'
+
+# File References
+thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-03-improve.md'
+nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-04-validate.md'
+workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
+outputFile: '{output_folder}/workflow-edit-{target_workflow_name}.md'
+
+# Task References
+advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation.xml'
+partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
+
+# Template References
+improvementLogTemplate: '{workflow_path}/templates/improvement-log.md'
+---
+
+# Step 3: Collaborative Improvement
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+To facilitate collaborative improvements to the workflow, working iteratively on each identified issue.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a workflow editor and improvement specialist
+- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
+- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
+- ✅ You guide improvements with explanations and options
+- ✅ User makes decisions and approves changes
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Work on ONE improvement at a time
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make changes without user approval
+- 💬 Explain the rationale for each proposed change
+- 🚪 ITERATE: improve, review, refine
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Facilitate improvements collaboratively and iteratively
+- 💾 Document all changes in improvement log
+- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]` before loading next step
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until user selects 'C' and improvements are complete
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Analysis and goals from previous steps guide improvements
+- Load workflow creation documentation as needed
+- Focus on improvements prioritized in step 2
+- This is about collaborative implementation, not solo editing
+
+## IMPROVEMENT PROCESS:
+
+### 1. Load Reference Materials
+
+Load documentation as needed for specific improvements:
+
+- `{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/step-template.md`
+- `{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/workflow-template.md`
+- `{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/bmb/docs/workflows/architecture.md`
+
+### 2. Address Each Improvement Iteratively
+
+For each prioritized improvement:
+
+#### A. Explain Current State
+
+Show the relevant section:
+"Here's how this step currently works:
+[Display current content]
+
+This can cause {{problem}} because {{reason}}."
+
+#### B. Propose Improvement
+
+Suggest specific changes:
+"Based on best practices, we could:
+{{proposedSolution}}
+
+This would help users by {{benefit}}."
+
+#### C. Collaborate on Approach
+
+Ask for input:
+"Does this approach address your need?"
+"Would you like to modify this suggestion?"
+"What concerns do you have about this change?"
+
+#### D. Get Explicit Approval
+
+"Should I apply this change?"
+
+#### E. Apply and Show Result
+
+Make the change and display:
+"Here's the updated version:
+[Display new content]
+
+Does this look right to you?"
+
+### 3. Common Improvement Patterns
+
+#### Step Flow Improvements
+
+- Merge redundant steps
+- Split complex steps
+- Reorder for better flow
+- Add missing transitions
+
+#### Instruction Style Refinement
+
+Load step-template.md for reference:
+
+- Convert prescriptive to intent-based for discovery steps
+- Add structure to vague instructions
+- Balance guidance with autonomy
+
+#### Variable Consistency Fixes
+
+- Identify all variable references
+- Ensure consistent naming (snake_case)
+- Verify variables are defined in workflow.md
+- Update all occurrences
+
+#### Menu System Updates
+
+- Standardize menu patterns
+- Ensure proper A/P/C options
+- Fix menu handling logic
+- Add Advanced Elicitation where useful
+
+#### Frontmatter Compliance
+
+- Add required fields to workflow.md
+- Ensure proper path variables
+- Include web_bundle configuration if needed
+- Remove unused fields
+
+#### Template Updates
+
+- Align template variables with step outputs
+- Improve variable naming
+- Add missing template sections
+- Test variable substitution
+
+### 4. Track All Changes
+
+For each improvement made, document:
+
+- What was changed
+- Why it was changed
+- Files modified
+- User approval
+
+## CONTENT TO APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
+
+After each improvement iteration, append to {outputFile}:
+
+Load and append content from {improvementLogTemplate}
+
+### 5. Present MENU OPTIONS
+
+Display: **Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue
+
+#### EXECUTION RULES:
+
+- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
+- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
+- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
+- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
+- Use menu handling logic section below
+
+#### Menu Handling Logic:
+
+- IF A: Execute {advancedElicitationTask}
+- IF P: Execute {partyModeWorkflow}
+- IF C: Save improvement log to {outputFile}, update frontmatter, then only then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
+- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#5-present-menu-options)
+
+## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
+
+ONLY WHEN C is selected and all prioritized improvements are complete and documented, will you then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile} to execute and begin validation step.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- All prioritized improvements addressed
+- User approved each change
+- Changes documented clearly
+- Workflow follows best practices
+- Improvement log updated
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Making changes without user approval
+- Not documenting changes
+- Skipping prioritized improvements
+- Breaking workflow functionality
+
+**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.