bmad-method 4.28.0 → 4.29.0

package/dist/agents/pm.txt

@@ -185,9 +185,9 @@ User can type `#yolo` to toggle to YOLO mode (process all sections at once).
 
 ## Purpose
 
-- Guide a structured response to a change trigger using the `change-checklist`.
+- Guide a structured response to a change trigger using the `.bmad-core/checklists/change-checklist`.
 - Analyze the impacts of the change on epics, project artifacts, and the MVP, guided by the checklist's structure.
-- Explore potential solutions (e.g., adjust scope, rollback elements, rescope features) as prompted by the checklist.
+- Explore potential solutions (e.g., adjust scope, rollback elements, re-scope features) as prompted by the checklist.
 - Draft specific, actionable proposed updates to any affected project artifacts (e.g., epics, user stories, PRD sections, architecture document sections) based on the analysis.
 - Produce a consolidated "Sprint Change Proposal" document that contains the impact analysis and the clearly drafted proposed edits for user review and approval.
 - Ensure a clear handoff path if the nature of the changes necessitates fundamental replanning by other core agents (like PM or Architect).
@@ -199,19 +199,16 @@ User can type `#yolo` to toggle to YOLO mode (process all sections at once).
 - **Acknowledge Task & Inputs:**
   - Confirm with the user that the "Correct Course Task" (Change Navigation & Integration) is being initiated.
   - Verify the change trigger and ensure you have the user's initial explanation of the issue and its perceived impact.
-  - Confirm access to all relevant project artifacts (e.g., PRD, Epics/Stories, Architecture Documents, UI/UX Specifications) and, critically, the `change-checklist` (e.g., `change-checklist`).
+  - Confirm access to all relevant project artifacts (e.g., PRD, Epics/Stories, Architecture Documents, UI/UX Specifications) and, critically, the `.bmad-core/checklists/change-checklist`.
 - **Establish Interaction Mode:**
   - Ask the user their preferred interaction mode for this task:
-    - **"Incrementally (Default & Recommended):** Shall we work through the `change-checklist` section by section, discussing findings and collaboratively drafting proposed changes for each relevant part before moving to the next? This allows for detailed, step-by-step refinement."
+    - **"Incrementally (Default & Recommended):** Shall we work through the change-checklist section by section, discussing findings and collaboratively drafting proposed changes for each relevant part before moving to the next? This allows for detailed, step-by-step refinement."
     - **"YOLO Mode (Batch Processing):** Or, would you prefer I conduct a more batched analysis based on the checklist and then present a consolidated set of findings and proposed changes for a broader review? This can be quicker for initial assessment but might require more extensive review of the combined proposals."
-  - Request the user to select their preferred mode.
-  - Once the user chooses, confirm the selected mode (e.g., "Okay, we will proceed in Incremental mode."). This chosen mode will govern how subsequent steps in this task are executed.
-- **Explain Process:** Briefly inform the user: "We will now use the `change-checklist` to analyze the change and draft proposed updates. I will guide you through the checklist items based on our chosen interaction mode."
-  <rule>When asking multiple questions or presenting multiple points for user input at once, number them clearly (e.g., 1., 2a., 2b.) to make it easier for the user to provide specific responses.</rule>
+  - Once the user chooses, confirm the selected mode and then inform the user: "We will now use the change-checklist to analyze the change and draft proposed updates. I will guide you through the checklist items based on our chosen interaction mode."
 
 ### 2. Execute Checklist Analysis (Iteratively or Batched, per Interaction Mode)
 
-- Systematically work through Sections 1-4 of the `change-checklist` (typically covering Change Context, Epic/Story Impact Analysis, Artifact Conflict Resolution, and Path Evaluation/Recommendation).
+- Systematically work through Sections 1-4 of the change-checklist (typically covering Change Context, Epic/Story Impact Analysis, Artifact Conflict Resolution, and Path Evaluation/Recommendation).
 - For each checklist item or logical group of items (depending on interaction mode):
   - Present the relevant prompt(s) or considerations from the checklist to the user.
   - Request necessary information and actively analyze the relevant project artifacts (PRD, epics, architecture documents, story history, etc.) to assess the impact.
@@ -234,7 +231,7 @@ User can type `#yolo` to toggle to YOLO mode (process all sections at once).
 
 ### 4. Generate "Sprint Change Proposal" with Edits
 
-- Synthesize the complete `change-checklist` analysis (covering findings from Sections 1-4) and all the agreed-upon proposed edits (from Instruction 3) into a single document titled "Sprint Change Proposal." This proposal should align with the structure suggested by Section 5 of the `change-checklist` (Proposal Components).
+- Synthesize the complete change-checklist analysis (covering findings from Sections 1-4) and all the agreed-upon proposed edits (from Instruction 3) into a single document titled "Sprint Change Proposal." This proposal should align with the structure suggested by Section 5 of the change-checklist.
 - The proposal must clearly present:
   - **Analysis Summary:** A concise overview of the original issue, its analyzed impact (on epics, artifacts, MVP scope), and the rationale for the chosen path forward.
   - **Specific Proposed Edits:** For each affected artifact, clearly show or describe the exact changes (e.g., "Change Story X.Y from: [old text] To: [new text]", "Add new Acceptance Criterion to Story A.B: [new AC]", "Update Section 3.2 of Architecture Document as follows: [new/modified text or diagram description]").
@@ -251,9 +248,9 @@ User can type `#yolo` to toggle to YOLO mode (process all sections at once).
 ## Output Deliverables
 
 - **Primary:** A "Sprint Change Proposal" document (in markdown format). This document will contain:
-  - A summary of the `change-checklist` analysis (issue, impact, rationale for the chosen path).
+  - A summary of the change-checklist analysis (issue, impact, rationale for the chosen path).
   - Specific, clearly drafted proposed edits for all affected project artifacts.
-- **Implicit:** An annotated `change-checklist` (or the record of its completion) reflecting the discussions, findings, and decisions made during the process.
+- **Implicit:** An annotated change-checklist (or the record of its completion) reflecting the discussions, findings, and decisions made during the process.
 ==================== END: .bmad-core/tasks/correct-course.md ====================
 
 ==================== START: .bmad-core/tasks/create-deep-research-prompt.md ====================
@@ -273,7 +270,7 @@ Generate well-structured research prompts that:
 
 ## Research Type Selection
 
-[[LLM: First, help the user select the most appropriate research focus based on their needs and any input documents they've provided.]]
+CRITICAL: First, help the user select the most appropriate research focus based on their needs and any input documents they've provided.
 
 ### 1. Research Focus Options
 
@@ -336,15 +333,13 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
    - Consider regulatory and legal implications
 
 9. **Custom Research Focus**
-   [[LLM: Allow user to define their own specific research focus.]]
+
    - User-defined research objectives
    - Specialized domain investigation
    - Cross-functional research needs
 
 ### 2. Input Processing
 
-[[LLM: Based on the selected research type and any provided inputs (project brief, brainstorming results, etc.), extract relevant context and constraints.]]
-
 **If Project Brief provided:**
 
 - Extract key product concepts and goals
@@ -377,11 +372,11 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 3. Research Prompt Structure
 
-[[LLM: Based on the selected research type and context, collaboratively develop a comprehensive research prompt with these components.]]
+CRITICAL: collaboratively develop a comprehensive research prompt with these components.
 
 #### A. Research Objectives
 
-[[LLM: Work with the user to articulate clear, specific objectives for the research.]]
+CRITICAL: collaborate with the user to articulate clear, specific objectives for the research.
 
 - Primary research goal and purpose
 - Key decisions the research will inform
@@ -390,7 +385,7 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 #### B. Research Questions
 
-[[LLM: Develop specific, actionable research questions organized by theme.]]
+CRITICAL: collaborate with the user to develop specific, actionable research questions organized by theme.
 
 **Core Questions:**
 
@@ -406,8 +401,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 #### C. Research Methodology
 
-[[LLM: Specify appropriate research methods based on the type and objectives.]]
-
 **Data Collection Methods:**
 
 - Secondary research sources
@@ -424,8 +417,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 #### D. Output Requirements
 
-[[LLM: Define how research findings should be structured and presented.]]
-
 **Format Specifications:**
 
 - Executive summary requirements
@@ -442,8 +433,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 4. Prompt Generation
 
-[[LLM: Synthesize all elements into a comprehensive, ready-to-use research prompt.]]
-
 **Research Prompt Template:**
 
 ```markdown
@@ -512,8 +501,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 5. Review and Refinement
 
-[[LLM: Present the draft research prompt for user review and refinement.]]
-
 1. **Present Complete Prompt**
 
    - Show the full research prompt
@@ -535,8 +522,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 6. Next Steps Guidance
 
-[[LLM: Provide clear guidance on how to use the research prompt.]]
-
 **Execution Options:**
 
 1. **Use with AI Research Assistant**: Provide this prompt to an AI model with research capabilities
@@ -980,20 +965,20 @@ The LLM will:
 
 ## Primary Method: Automatic with markdown-tree
 
-[[LLM: First, check if markdownExploder is set to true in bmad-core/core-config.yaml. If it is, attempt to run the command: `md-tree explode {input file} {output path}`.
+[[LLM: First, check if markdownExploder is set to true in .bmad-core/core-config.yaml. If it is, attempt to run the command: `md-tree explode {input file} {output path}`.
 
 If the command succeeds, inform the user that the document has been sharded successfully and STOP - do not proceed further.
 
 If the command fails (especially with an error indicating the command is not found or not available), inform the user: "The markdownExploder setting is enabled but the md-tree command is not available. Please either:
 
 1. Install @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser globally with: `npm install -g @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser`
-2. Or set markdownExploder to false in bmad-core/core-config.yaml
+2. Or set markdownExploder to false in .bmad-core/core-config.yaml
 
 **IMPORTANT: STOP HERE - do not proceed with manual sharding until one of the above actions is taken.**"
 
 If markdownExploder is set to false, inform the user: "The markdownExploder setting is currently false. For better performance and reliability, you should:
 
-1. Set markdownExploder to true in bmad-core/core-config.yaml
+1. Set markdownExploder to true in .bmad-core/core-config.yaml
 2. Install @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser globally with: `npm install -g @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser`
 
 I will now proceed with the manual sharding process."
@@ -1033,8 +1018,6 @@ If the user has @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser installed, use it and skip the manu
 
 ## Manual Method (if @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser is not available or user indicated manual method)
 
-[[LLM: Only proceed with the manual instructions below if the user cannot or does not want to use @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser.]]
-
 ### Task Instructions
 
 1. Identify Document and Target Location
@@ -1045,7 +1028,7 @@ If the user has @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser installed, use it and skip the manu
 
 2. Parse and Extract Sections
 
-[[LLM: When sharding the document:
+CRITICAL AEGNT SHARDING RULES:
 
 1. Read the entire document content
 2. Identify all level 2 sections (## headings)
@@ -1106,8 +1089,6 @@ Create an `index.md` file in the sharded folder that:
 
 ### 5. Preserve Special Content
 
-[[LLM: Pay special attention to preserving:
-
 1. **Code blocks**: Must capture complete blocks including:
 
    ```language
@@ -1129,7 +1110,7 @@ Create an `index.md` file in the sharded folder that:
 
 6. **Links and references**: Keep all markdown links intact
 
-7. **Template markup**: If documents contain {{placeholders}} or [[LLM instructions]], preserve exactly]]
+7. **Template markup**: If documents contain {{placeholders}} ,preserve exactly
 
 ### 6. Validation
 

package/dist/agents/po.txt

@@ -209,20 +209,20 @@ The LLM will:
 
 ## Primary Method: Automatic with markdown-tree
 
-[[LLM: First, check if markdownExploder is set to true in bmad-core/core-config.yaml. If it is, attempt to run the command: `md-tree explode {input file} {output path}`.
+[[LLM: First, check if markdownExploder is set to true in .bmad-core/core-config.yaml. If it is, attempt to run the command: `md-tree explode {input file} {output path}`.
 
 If the command succeeds, inform the user that the document has been sharded successfully and STOP - do not proceed further.
 
 If the command fails (especially with an error indicating the command is not found or not available), inform the user: "The markdownExploder setting is enabled but the md-tree command is not available. Please either:
 
 1. Install @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser globally with: `npm install -g @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser`
-2. Or set markdownExploder to false in bmad-core/core-config.yaml
+2. Or set markdownExploder to false in .bmad-core/core-config.yaml
 
 **IMPORTANT: STOP HERE - do not proceed with manual sharding until one of the above actions is taken.**"
 
 If markdownExploder is set to false, inform the user: "The markdownExploder setting is currently false. For better performance and reliability, you should:
 
-1. Set markdownExploder to true in bmad-core/core-config.yaml
+1. Set markdownExploder to true in .bmad-core/core-config.yaml
 2. Install @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser globally with: `npm install -g @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser`
 
 I will now proceed with the manual sharding process."
@@ -262,8 +262,6 @@ If the user has @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser installed, use it and skip the manu
 
 ## Manual Method (if @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser is not available or user indicated manual method)
 
-[[LLM: Only proceed with the manual instructions below if the user cannot or does not want to use @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser.]]
-
 ### Task Instructions
 
 1. Identify Document and Target Location
@@ -274,7 +272,7 @@ If the user has @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser installed, use it and skip the manu
 
 2. Parse and Extract Sections
 
-[[LLM: When sharding the document:
+CRITICAL AEGNT SHARDING RULES:
 
 1. Read the entire document content
 2. Identify all level 2 sections (## headings)
@@ -335,8 +333,6 @@ Create an `index.md` file in the sharded folder that:
 
 ### 5. Preserve Special Content
 
-[[LLM: Pay special attention to preserving:
-
 1. **Code blocks**: Must capture complete blocks including:
 
    ```language
@@ -358,7 +354,7 @@ Create an `index.md` file in the sharded folder that:
 
 6. **Links and references**: Keep all markdown links intact
 
-7. **Template markup**: If documents contain {{placeholders}} or [[LLM instructions]], preserve exactly]]
+7. **Template markup**: If documents contain {{placeholders}} ,preserve exactly
 
 ### 6. Validation
 
@@ -397,9 +393,9 @@ Document sharded successfully:
 
 ## Purpose
 
-- Guide a structured response to a change trigger using the `change-checklist`.
+- Guide a structured response to a change trigger using the `.bmad-core/checklists/change-checklist`.
 - Analyze the impacts of the change on epics, project artifacts, and the MVP, guided by the checklist's structure.
-- Explore potential solutions (e.g., adjust scope, rollback elements, rescope features) as prompted by the checklist.
+- Explore potential solutions (e.g., adjust scope, rollback elements, re-scope features) as prompted by the checklist.
 - Draft specific, actionable proposed updates to any affected project artifacts (e.g., epics, user stories, PRD sections, architecture document sections) based on the analysis.
 - Produce a consolidated "Sprint Change Proposal" document that contains the impact analysis and the clearly drafted proposed edits for user review and approval.
 - Ensure a clear handoff path if the nature of the changes necessitates fundamental replanning by other core agents (like PM or Architect).
@@ -411,19 +407,16 @@ Document sharded successfully:
 - **Acknowledge Task & Inputs:**
   - Confirm with the user that the "Correct Course Task" (Change Navigation & Integration) is being initiated.
   - Verify the change trigger and ensure you have the user's initial explanation of the issue and its perceived impact.
-  - Confirm access to all relevant project artifacts (e.g., PRD, Epics/Stories, Architecture Documents, UI/UX Specifications) and, critically, the `change-checklist` (e.g., `change-checklist`).
+  - Confirm access to all relevant project artifacts (e.g., PRD, Epics/Stories, Architecture Documents, UI/UX Specifications) and, critically, the `.bmad-core/checklists/change-checklist`.
 - **Establish Interaction Mode:**
   - Ask the user their preferred interaction mode for this task:
-    - **"Incrementally (Default & Recommended):** Shall we work through the `change-checklist` section by section, discussing findings and collaboratively drafting proposed changes for each relevant part before moving to the next? This allows for detailed, step-by-step refinement."
+    - **"Incrementally (Default & Recommended):** Shall we work through the change-checklist section by section, discussing findings and collaboratively drafting proposed changes for each relevant part before moving to the next? This allows for detailed, step-by-step refinement."
     - **"YOLO Mode (Batch Processing):** Or, would you prefer I conduct a more batched analysis based on the checklist and then present a consolidated set of findings and proposed changes for a broader review? This can be quicker for initial assessment but might require more extensive review of the combined proposals."
-  - Request the user to select their preferred mode.
-  - Once the user chooses, confirm the selected mode (e.g., "Okay, we will proceed in Incremental mode."). This chosen mode will govern how subsequent steps in this task are executed.
-- **Explain Process:** Briefly inform the user: "We will now use the `change-checklist` to analyze the change and draft proposed updates. I will guide you through the checklist items based on our chosen interaction mode."
-  <rule>When asking multiple questions or presenting multiple points for user input at once, number them clearly (e.g., 1., 2a., 2b.) to make it easier for the user to provide specific responses.</rule>
+  - Once the user chooses, confirm the selected mode and then inform the user: "We will now use the change-checklist to analyze the change and draft proposed updates. I will guide you through the checklist items based on our chosen interaction mode."
 
 ### 2. Execute Checklist Analysis (Iteratively or Batched, per Interaction Mode)
 
-- Systematically work through Sections 1-4 of the `change-checklist` (typically covering Change Context, Epic/Story Impact Analysis, Artifact Conflict Resolution, and Path Evaluation/Recommendation).
+- Systematically work through Sections 1-4 of the change-checklist (typically covering Change Context, Epic/Story Impact Analysis, Artifact Conflict Resolution, and Path Evaluation/Recommendation).
 - For each checklist item or logical group of items (depending on interaction mode):
   - Present the relevant prompt(s) or considerations from the checklist to the user.
   - Request necessary information and actively analyze the relevant project artifacts (PRD, epics, architecture documents, story history, etc.) to assess the impact.
@@ -446,7 +439,7 @@ Document sharded successfully:
 
 ### 4. Generate "Sprint Change Proposal" with Edits
 
-- Synthesize the complete `change-checklist` analysis (covering findings from Sections 1-4) and all the agreed-upon proposed edits (from Instruction 3) into a single document titled "Sprint Change Proposal." This proposal should align with the structure suggested by Section 5 of the `change-checklist` (Proposal Components).
+- Synthesize the complete change-checklist analysis (covering findings from Sections 1-4) and all the agreed-upon proposed edits (from Instruction 3) into a single document titled "Sprint Change Proposal." This proposal should align with the structure suggested by Section 5 of the change-checklist.
 - The proposal must clearly present:
   - **Analysis Summary:** A concise overview of the original issue, its analyzed impact (on epics, artifacts, MVP scope), and the rationale for the chosen path forward.
   - **Specific Proposed Edits:** For each affected artifact, clearly show or describe the exact changes (e.g., "Change Story X.Y from: [old text] To: [new text]", "Add new Acceptance Criterion to Story A.B: [new AC]", "Update Section 3.2 of Architecture Document as follows: [new/modified text or diagram description]").
@@ -463,9 +456,9 @@ Document sharded successfully:
 ## Output Deliverables
 
 - **Primary:** A "Sprint Change Proposal" document (in markdown format). This document will contain:
-  - A summary of the `change-checklist` analysis (issue, impact, rationale for the chosen path).
+  - A summary of the change-checklist analysis (issue, impact, rationale for the chosen path).
   - Specific, clearly drafted proposed edits for all affected project artifacts.
-- **Implicit:** An annotated `change-checklist` (or the record of its completion) reflecting the discussions, findings, and decisions made during the process.
+- **Implicit:** An annotated change-checklist (or the record of its completion) reflecting the discussions, findings, and decisions made during the process.
 ==================== END: .bmad-core/tasks/correct-course.md ====================
 
 ==================== START: .bmad-core/tasks/brownfield-create-epic.md ====================

package/dist/agents/qa.txt

@@ -96,9 +96,7 @@ dependencies:
 ==================== START: .bmad-core/tasks/review-story.md ====================
 # review-story
 
-When a developer marks a story as "Ready for Review", perform a comprehensive senior developer code review with the ability to refactor and improve code directly.
-
-[[LLM: QA Agent executing review-story task as Senior Developer]]
+When a developer agent marks a story as "Ready for Review", perform a comprehensive senior developer code review with the ability to refactor and improve code directly.
 
 ## Prerequisites
 
@@ -227,6 +225,7 @@ After review and any refactoring, append your results to the story file in the Q
 ## Blocking Conditions
 
 Stop the review and request clarification if:
+
 - Story file is incomplete or missing critical sections
 - File List is empty or clearly incomplete
 - No tests exist when they were required
@@ -236,6 +235,7 @@ Stop the review and request clarification if:
 ## Completion
 
 After review:
+
 1. If all items are checked and approved: Update story status to "Done"
 2. If unchecked items remain: Keep status as "Review" for dev to address
 3. Always provide constructive feedback and explanations for learning

package/dist/agents/sm.txt

@@ -189,15 +189,14 @@ ALWAYS cite source documents: `[Source: architecture/{filename}.md#{section}]`
 - Verify all source references are included for technical details
 - Ensure tasks align with both epic requirements and architecture constraints
 - Update status to "Draft" and save the story file
-- If `workflow.trackProgress: true` and `workflow.updateOnCompletion: true`, call update-workflow-plan task to mark story creation step complete
-- Execute `tasks/execute-checklist` `checklists/story-draft-checklist`
+- Execute `.bmad-core/tasks/execute-checklist` `.bmad-core/checklists/story-draft-checklist`
 - Provide summary to user including:
   - Story created: `{devStoryLocation}/{epicNum}.{storyNum}.story.md`
   - Status: Draft
   - Key technical components included from architecture docs
   - Any deviations or conflicts noted between epic and architecture
   - Checklist Results
-  - Next steps: For Complex stories, suggest the user carefully review the story draft and also optionally have the PO run the task `validate-next-story`
+  - Next steps: For Complex stories, suggest the user carefully review the story draft and also optionally have the PO run the task `.bmad-core/tasks/validate-next-story`
 ==================== END: .bmad-core/tasks/create-next-story.md ====================
 
 ==================== START: .bmad-core/tasks/execute-checklist.md ====================
@@ -301,9 +300,9 @@ The LLM will:
 
 ## Purpose
 
-- Guide a structured response to a change trigger using the `change-checklist`.
+- Guide a structured response to a change trigger using the `.bmad-core/checklists/change-checklist`.
 - Analyze the impacts of the change on epics, project artifacts, and the MVP, guided by the checklist's structure.
-- Explore potential solutions (e.g., adjust scope, rollback elements, rescope features) as prompted by the checklist.
+- Explore potential solutions (e.g., adjust scope, rollback elements, re-scope features) as prompted by the checklist.
 - Draft specific, actionable proposed updates to any affected project artifacts (e.g., epics, user stories, PRD sections, architecture document sections) based on the analysis.
 - Produce a consolidated "Sprint Change Proposal" document that contains the impact analysis and the clearly drafted proposed edits for user review and approval.
 - Ensure a clear handoff path if the nature of the changes necessitates fundamental replanning by other core agents (like PM or Architect).
@@ -315,19 +314,16 @@ The LLM will:
 - **Acknowledge Task & Inputs:**
   - Confirm with the user that the "Correct Course Task" (Change Navigation & Integration) is being initiated.
   - Verify the change trigger and ensure you have the user's initial explanation of the issue and its perceived impact.
-  - Confirm access to all relevant project artifacts (e.g., PRD, Epics/Stories, Architecture Documents, UI/UX Specifications) and, critically, the `change-checklist` (e.g., `change-checklist`).
+  - Confirm access to all relevant project artifacts (e.g., PRD, Epics/Stories, Architecture Documents, UI/UX Specifications) and, critically, the `.bmad-core/checklists/change-checklist`.
 - **Establish Interaction Mode:**
   - Ask the user their preferred interaction mode for this task:
-    - **"Incrementally (Default & Recommended):** Shall we work through the `change-checklist` section by section, discussing findings and collaboratively drafting proposed changes for each relevant part before moving to the next? This allows for detailed, step-by-step refinement."
+    - **"Incrementally (Default & Recommended):** Shall we work through the change-checklist section by section, discussing findings and collaboratively drafting proposed changes for each relevant part before moving to the next? This allows for detailed, step-by-step refinement."
     - **"YOLO Mode (Batch Processing):** Or, would you prefer I conduct a more batched analysis based on the checklist and then present a consolidated set of findings and proposed changes for a broader review? This can be quicker for initial assessment but might require more extensive review of the combined proposals."
-  - Request the user to select their preferred mode.
-  - Once the user chooses, confirm the selected mode (e.g., "Okay, we will proceed in Incremental mode."). This chosen mode will govern how subsequent steps in this task are executed.
-- **Explain Process:** Briefly inform the user: "We will now use the `change-checklist` to analyze the change and draft proposed updates. I will guide you through the checklist items based on our chosen interaction mode."
-  <rule>When asking multiple questions or presenting multiple points for user input at once, number them clearly (e.g., 1., 2a., 2b.) to make it easier for the user to provide specific responses.</rule>
+  - Once the user chooses, confirm the selected mode and then inform the user: "We will now use the change-checklist to analyze the change and draft proposed updates. I will guide you through the checklist items based on our chosen interaction mode."
 
 ### 2. Execute Checklist Analysis (Iteratively or Batched, per Interaction Mode)
 
-- Systematically work through Sections 1-4 of the `change-checklist` (typically covering Change Context, Epic/Story Impact Analysis, Artifact Conflict Resolution, and Path Evaluation/Recommendation).
+- Systematically work through Sections 1-4 of the change-checklist (typically covering Change Context, Epic/Story Impact Analysis, Artifact Conflict Resolution, and Path Evaluation/Recommendation).
 - For each checklist item or logical group of items (depending on interaction mode):
   - Present the relevant prompt(s) or considerations from the checklist to the user.
   - Request necessary information and actively analyze the relevant project artifacts (PRD, epics, architecture documents, story history, etc.) to assess the impact.
@@ -350,7 +346,7 @@ The LLM will:
 
 ### 4. Generate "Sprint Change Proposal" with Edits
 
-- Synthesize the complete `change-checklist` analysis (covering findings from Sections 1-4) and all the agreed-upon proposed edits (from Instruction 3) into a single document titled "Sprint Change Proposal." This proposal should align with the structure suggested by Section 5 of the `change-checklist` (Proposal Components).
+- Synthesize the complete change-checklist analysis (covering findings from Sections 1-4) and all the agreed-upon proposed edits (from Instruction 3) into a single document titled "Sprint Change Proposal." This proposal should align with the structure suggested by Section 5 of the change-checklist.
 - The proposal must clearly present:
   - **Analysis Summary:** A concise overview of the original issue, its analyzed impact (on epics, artifacts, MVP scope), and the rationale for the chosen path forward.
   - **Specific Proposed Edits:** For each affected artifact, clearly show or describe the exact changes (e.g., "Change Story X.Y from: [old text] To: [new text]", "Add new Acceptance Criterion to Story A.B: [new AC]", "Update Section 3.2 of Architecture Document as follows: [new/modified text or diagram description]").
@@ -367,9 +363,9 @@ The LLM will:
 ## Output Deliverables
 
 - **Primary:** A "Sprint Change Proposal" document (in markdown format). This document will contain:
-  - A summary of the `change-checklist` analysis (issue, impact, rationale for the chosen path).
+  - A summary of the change-checklist analysis (issue, impact, rationale for the chosen path).
   - Specific, clearly drafted proposed edits for all affected project artifacts.
-- **Implicit:** An annotated `change-checklist` (or the record of its completion) reflecting the discussions, findings, and decisions made during the process.
+- **Implicit:** An annotated change-checklist (or the record of its completion) reflecting the discussions, findings, and decisions made during the process.
 ==================== END: .bmad-core/tasks/correct-course.md ====================
 
 ==================== START: .bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.yaml ====================

package/dist/agents/ux-expert.txt

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ To generate a masterful, comprehensive, and optimized prompt that can be used wi
 
 ## Inputs
 
-- Completed UI/UX Specification (`front-end-spec`)
+- Completed UI/UX Specification (`front-end-spec.md`)
 - Completed Frontend Architecture Document (`front-end-architecture`) or a full stack combined architecture such as `architecture.md`
 - Main System Architecture Document (`architecture` - for API contracts and tech stack to give further context)
 
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ Generate well-structured research prompts that:
 
 ## Research Type Selection
 
-[[LLM: First, help the user select the most appropriate research focus based on their needs and any input documents they've provided.]]
+CRITICAL: First, help the user select the most appropriate research focus based on their needs and any input documents they've provided.
 
 ### 1. Research Focus Options
 
@@ -226,15 +226,13 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
    - Consider regulatory and legal implications
 
 9. **Custom Research Focus**
-   [[LLM: Allow user to define their own specific research focus.]]
+
    - User-defined research objectives
    - Specialized domain investigation
    - Cross-functional research needs
 
 ### 2. Input Processing
 
-[[LLM: Based on the selected research type and any provided inputs (project brief, brainstorming results, etc.), extract relevant context and constraints.]]
-
 **If Project Brief provided:**
 
 - Extract key product concepts and goals
@@ -267,11 +265,11 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 3. Research Prompt Structure
 
-[[LLM: Based on the selected research type and context, collaboratively develop a comprehensive research prompt with these components.]]
+CRITICAL: collaboratively develop a comprehensive research prompt with these components.
 
 #### A. Research Objectives
 
-[[LLM: Work with the user to articulate clear, specific objectives for the research.]]
+CRITICAL: collaborate with the user to articulate clear, specific objectives for the research.
 
 - Primary research goal and purpose
 - Key decisions the research will inform
@@ -280,7 +278,7 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 #### B. Research Questions
 
-[[LLM: Develop specific, actionable research questions organized by theme.]]
+CRITICAL: collaborate with the user to develop specific, actionable research questions organized by theme.
 
 **Core Questions:**
 
@@ -296,8 +294,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 #### C. Research Methodology
 
-[[LLM: Specify appropriate research methods based on the type and objectives.]]
-
 **Data Collection Methods:**
 
 - Secondary research sources
@@ -314,8 +310,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 #### D. Output Requirements
 
-[[LLM: Define how research findings should be structured and presented.]]
-
 **Format Specifications:**
 
 - Executive summary requirements
@@ -332,8 +326,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 4. Prompt Generation
 
-[[LLM: Synthesize all elements into a comprehensive, ready-to-use research prompt.]]
-
 **Research Prompt Template:**
 
 ```markdown
@@ -402,8 +394,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 5. Review and Refinement
 
-[[LLM: Present the draft research prompt for user review and refinement.]]
-
 1. **Present Complete Prompt**
 
    - Show the full research prompt
@@ -425,8 +415,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 6. Next Steps Guidance
 
-[[LLM: Provide clear guidance on how to use the research prompt.]]
-
 **Execution Options:**
 
 1. **Use with AI Research Assistant**: Provide this prompt to an AI model with research capabilities

package/dist/expansion-packs/bmad-2d-phaser-game-dev/agents/game-designer.txt

@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ Generate well-structured research prompts that:
 
 ## Research Type Selection
 
-[[LLM: First, help the user select the most appropriate research focus based on their needs and any input documents they've provided.]]
+CRITICAL: First, help the user select the most appropriate research focus based on their needs and any input documents they've provided.
 
 ### 1. Research Focus Options
 
@@ -666,15 +666,13 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
    - Consider regulatory and legal implications
 
 9. **Custom Research Focus**
-   [[LLM: Allow user to define their own specific research focus.]]
+
    - User-defined research objectives
    - Specialized domain investigation
    - Cross-functional research needs
 
 ### 2. Input Processing
 
-[[LLM: Based on the selected research type and any provided inputs (project brief, brainstorming results, etc.), extract relevant context and constraints.]]
-
 **If Project Brief provided:**
 
 - Extract key product concepts and goals
@@ -707,11 +705,11 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 3. Research Prompt Structure
 
-[[LLM: Based on the selected research type and context, collaboratively develop a comprehensive research prompt with these components.]]
+CRITICAL: collaboratively develop a comprehensive research prompt with these components.
 
 #### A. Research Objectives
 
-[[LLM: Work with the user to articulate clear, specific objectives for the research.]]
+CRITICAL: collaborate with the user to articulate clear, specific objectives for the research.
 
 - Primary research goal and purpose
 - Key decisions the research will inform
@@ -720,7 +718,7 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 #### B. Research Questions
 
-[[LLM: Develop specific, actionable research questions organized by theme.]]
+CRITICAL: collaborate with the user to develop specific, actionable research questions organized by theme.
 
 **Core Questions:**
 
@@ -736,8 +734,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 #### C. Research Methodology
 
-[[LLM: Specify appropriate research methods based on the type and objectives.]]
-
 **Data Collection Methods:**
 
 - Secondary research sources
@@ -754,8 +750,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 #### D. Output Requirements
 
-[[LLM: Define how research findings should be structured and presented.]]
-
 **Format Specifications:**
 
 - Executive summary requirements
@@ -772,8 +766,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 4. Prompt Generation
 
-[[LLM: Synthesize all elements into a comprehensive, ready-to-use research prompt.]]
-
 **Research Prompt Template:**
 
 ```markdown
@@ -842,8 +834,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 5. Review and Refinement
 
-[[LLM: Present the draft research prompt for user review and refinement.]]
-
 1. **Present Complete Prompt**
 
    - Show the full research prompt
@@ -865,8 +855,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
 
 ### 6. Next Steps Guidance
 
-[[LLM: Provide clear guidance on how to use the research prompt.]]
-
 **Execution Options:**
 
 1. **Use with AI Research Assistant**: Provide this prompt to an AI model with research capabilities