bmad-method-test-architecture-enterprise 1.27.2-next.4 → 1.27.2-next.6

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
31
31
  "name": "bmad-method-test-architecture-enterprise",
32
32
  "source": "./",
33
33
  "description": "Master Test Architect module for quality strategy, test automation, CI/CD quality gates, and structured testing education. Part of the BMad Method ecosystem.",
34
- "version": "1.27.2-next.4",
34
+ "version": "1.27.2-next.6",
35
35
  "author": {
36
36
  "name": "Murat K Ozcan (TEA Creator) & Brian (BMad) Madison"
37
37
  },
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "$schema": "https://json.schemastore.org/package.json",
3
3
  "name": "bmad-method-test-architecture-enterprise",
4
- "version": "1.27.2-next.4",
4
+ "version": "1.27.2-next.6",
5
5
  "description": "Master Test Architect for quality strategy, test automation, and release gates",
6
6
  "keywords": [
7
7
  "bmad",
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
127
127
  "test:eval-routing-evidence": "node test/test-routing-evidence.js",
128
128
  "test:eval-schemas": "node tools/validate-eval-schemas.js",
129
129
  "test:eval-teach-me-testing-data": "node test/eval-teach-me-testing.js --validate-only",
130
- "test:eval-test-design-data": "node test/eval-test-design.js --validate-only",
130
+ "test:eval-test-design-data": "node test/eval-test-design.js --validate-only && node test/test-test-design-grounding.js",
131
131
  "test:eval-trace-data": "node test/eval-trace.js --validate-only",
132
132
  "test:eval-transcript-data": "node test/eval-transcript.js --validate-only",
133
133
  "test:file-system-conformance": "node test/test-file-system-conformance.js",
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ Also identify **ASRs** (Architecturally Significant Requirements):
60
60
  Using `risk-governance.md` and `probability-impact.md` (if loaded):
61
61
 
62
62
  - Identify real risks (not just features)
63
+ - Ground every risk in an explicit statement from the supplied epic or a named artifact loaded for this run. Record the supporting statement in the risk description or mitigation notes so another reader can trace the row.
64
+ - Keep the register bounded by the scope supported by the supplied epic or a named artifact loaded for this run. Do not add plausible risks merely because they are common in other systems. If a concern has no supporting statement, record it as an assumption or clarification outside the risk register.
63
65
  - Classify by category: TECH / SEC / PERF / DATA / BUS / OPS
64
66
  - Score Probability (1–3) and Impact (1–3)
65
67
  - Calculate Risk Score (P × I)
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ For each requirement or risk-driven scenario:
45
45
  - Ensure no duplicate coverage across levels
46
46
  - Assign priorities (P0–P3) using `test-priorities-matrix.md`
47
47
  - Map NFR-derived risks to planned validation scenarios and evidence sources
48
+ - Use the exact `Risk ID` assigned in the risk register in every `Risk Link` cell. A prose description alone is not a traceable mapping.
49
+ - Give every material risk at least one coverage row whose `Test Level` is suitable for that risk under `test-levels-framework.md`. Explain the suitability in the row notes when the level is not obvious. Preserve the risk ID when rows are split across priorities or test levels.
48
50
 
49
51
  **Priority rules:** decide each priority on business impact, user reach, and workaround
50
52
  availability. Risk score is supporting evidence and is not a required condition for any priority.
@@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ workaround. Risk score is supporting evidence and is not a required condition.
131
131
  | {requirement} | E2E | R-001 | 3 | QA | {notes} |
132
132
  | {requirement} | API | R-002 | 5 | QA | {notes} |
133
133
 
134
+ Use the exact `Risk ID` from the risk assessment in `Risk Link`. Select `Test Level` using `test-levels-framework.md`; explain the suitability in `Notes` when the level is not obvious. Every material risk must appear in at least one coverage row at a test level that can establish it.
135
+
134
136
  **Total P0**: {p0_count} tests, {p0_hours} hours
135
137
 
136
138
  ### P1 (High)
@@ -467,6 +467,20 @@ const gateReport = {
467
467
 
468
468
  This file is the portable, automation-friendly companion to the markdown report. Any CI/CD pipeline, reporting dashboard, or LLM agent can consume it without parsing markdown.
469
469
 
470
+ The summary metadata is a strict contract. Emit the resolved run value for every field below. Use the explicit unknown representation `unknown` when a runtime value cannot be resolved. Preserve the exact artifact path supplied by `{outputFile}`. Empty URL fields remain empty until a CI/CD uploader populates them. The formal requirements oracle uses `not_applicable` for both optional UI heuristic statuses when no synthetic user journey oracle exists.
471
+
472
+ | Field | Required value for this run |
473
+ | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
474
+ | `decision_mode` | `{decision_mode}` |
475
+ | `links.trace_report_path` | `{outputFile}` |
476
+ | `links.trace_report_url` | `''` |
477
+ | `links.artifact_url` | `''` |
478
+ | `links.journey_evidence_url` | `''` |
479
+ | `tests.skipped_cases`, `tests.fixme_cases`, `tests.pending_cases` | The real inventory counts. Use `0` when no cases have that status. |
480
+ | `heuristics.ui_journey_status`, `heuristics.ui_state_status` | `not_applicable` for a non-synthetic formal requirements oracle |
481
+
482
+ Do not shorten `{outputFile}`, invent a URL, or replace an unavailable runtime value with a guess. Use the literal string `unknown` for an unavailable runtime value.
483
+
470
484
  ```javascript
471
485
  const buildFallbackInventory = () => {
472
486
  const byLevel = {