bmad-enhanced 1.0.0-alpha → 1.0.2-alpha
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
|
@@ -0,0 +1,710 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Emma User Guide - Empathy Mapping Specialist 🎨
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Agent:** Emma (empathy-mapper)
|
|
4
|
+
**Version:** 1.0.0
|
|
5
|
+
**Module:** BMAD Enhanced (bme)
|
|
6
|
+
**Last Updated:** 2026-02-14
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
---
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Quick Start
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
**What is Emma?**
|
|
13
|
+
Emma is a design thinking expert who guides you through creating comprehensive empathy maps for your target users. She helps you understand user needs, emotions, and pain points through a structured 6-step process.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
**When to use Emma:**
|
|
16
|
+
- Starting a new product or feature design
|
|
17
|
+
- Trying to understand user pain points
|
|
18
|
+
- Creating user personas based on research
|
|
19
|
+
- Aligning your team on user needs
|
|
20
|
+
- Validating design decisions with user insights
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
**What you'll get:**
|
|
23
|
+
A professional empathy map document with user insights, pain points, desired gains, and design implications.
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
---
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## How to Invoke Emma
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### Method 1: Slash Command (Preferred)
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
If you're in a BMAD environment that supports slash commands:
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
```
|
|
34
|
+
/bmad-agent-bme-empathy-mapper
|
|
35
|
+
```
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
**When this works:**
|
|
38
|
+
- Native BMAD CLI environment
|
|
39
|
+
- BMAD-enabled IDEs
|
|
40
|
+
- Production BMAD installations
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
**If you see "Unknown skill":**
|
|
43
|
+
This means slash commands aren't available in your environment. Use Method 2 instead.
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
---
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
### Method 2: Direct Agent File Reading (Always Works)
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
In any environment (including Claude Code), you can invoke Emma by reading her agent file:
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
1. Navigate to your BMAD project root
|
|
52
|
+
2. Read the file: `_bmad/bme/_designos/agents/empathy-mapper.md`
|
|
53
|
+
3. Emma will activate and greet you
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
**Example (Claude Code):**
|
|
56
|
+
```
|
|
57
|
+
Read the file at _bmad/bme/_designos/agents/empathy-mapper.md
|
|
58
|
+
```
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
**Example (Terminal):**
|
|
61
|
+
```bash
|
|
62
|
+
cat _bmad/bme/_designos/agents/empathy-mapper.md
|
|
63
|
+
```
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
This method has been fully tested and validated.
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
---
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
## Emma's Menu Options
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
Once Emma activates, you'll see 6 menu options:
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
```
|
|
74
|
+
1. [MH] Redisplay Menu Help
|
|
75
|
+
2. [CH] Chat with Emma about empathy mapping, user research, or design thinking
|
|
76
|
+
3. [EM] Create Empathy Map: Guided 6-step process to create comprehensive user empathy map
|
|
77
|
+
4. [VM] Validate Empathy Map: Review existing empathy map against research evidence
|
|
78
|
+
5. [PM] Start Party Mode
|
|
79
|
+
6. [DA] Dismiss Agent
|
|
80
|
+
```
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
### How to Select an Option
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
**Three ways to choose:**
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
1. **Number:** Type `3` to select option 3
|
|
87
|
+
2. **Command Code:** Type `EM` to create an empathy map
|
|
88
|
+
3. **Fuzzy Match:** Type `empathy` or `map` or `create` - Emma will match the command
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
---
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
## Creating an Empathy Map (EM)
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
### Overview
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
Emma guides you through 6 steps to create a comprehensive empathy map:
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
1. **Define Target User** - Who are you creating this for?
|
|
99
|
+
2. **Says & Thinks** - What do they say aloud? What do they think privately?
|
|
100
|
+
3. **Does & Feels** - What actions do they take? What emotions do they feel?
|
|
101
|
+
4. **Pain Points** - What frustrates or challenges them?
|
|
102
|
+
5. **Gains** - What do they want to achieve?
|
|
103
|
+
6. **Synthesize** - Create the final empathy map artifact
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
**Estimated Time:** 30-60 minutes (depending on research depth)
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
---
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
### Step 1: Define Target User
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
Emma will ask you to define:
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
- **Demographics:** Age, occupation, tech savviness, context
|
|
114
|
+
- **Job-to-be-done:** What are they trying to accomplish?
|
|
115
|
+
- **Context:** When and where are they using your product?
|
|
116
|
+
- **Research Sources:** What evidence informs this empathy map?
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
**Example:**
|
|
119
|
+
```
|
|
120
|
+
Target User: Sarah, 34-year-old marketing manager
|
|
121
|
+
Job-to-be-done: Manage personal finances through mobile banking
|
|
122
|
+
Context: Daily usage, 3-5 times per day, sessions under 2 minutes
|
|
123
|
+
Research: User interview (45 min), behavioral observation data
|
|
124
|
+
```
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
**Tip:** The more specific, the better. "Mobile app users" is too broad. "Busy parents managing kids' schedules on mobile" is specific and actionable.
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
---
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
### Step 2: Says & Thinks
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
Emma will ask for:
|
|
133
|
+
|
|
134
|
+
**What they SAY (3-5 direct quotes from research):**
|
|
135
|
+
- Pull actual quotes from interviews, surveys, or conversations
|
|
136
|
+
- Include both positive and negative statements
|
|
137
|
+
- Use their exact words when possible
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
**What they THINK (3-5 inferred thoughts):**
|
|
140
|
+
- Based on behavior, tone, and context
|
|
141
|
+
- What they're thinking but not saying
|
|
142
|
+
- Infer from evidence, don't speculate
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
**Example:**
|
|
145
|
+
```
|
|
146
|
+
SAYS:
|
|
147
|
+
- "I just want to check my balance quickly"
|
|
148
|
+
- "The app is pretty, but I can't find basic features"
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
THINKS:
|
|
151
|
+
- "If this takes more than 30 seconds, I'm giving up"
|
|
152
|
+
- "I'm constantly anxious about being logged out mid-transaction"
|
|
153
|
+
```
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
---
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
### Step 3: Does & Feels
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
Emma will ask for:
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
**What they DO (3-5 observable actions):**
|
|
162
|
+
- Specific behaviors and habits
|
|
163
|
+
- Include frequency/timing when relevant
|
|
164
|
+
- Note workarounds or "hacks" they've created
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
**What they FEEL (3-5 emotional states):**
|
|
167
|
+
- Use emotion words (frustrated, anxious, excited, relieved)
|
|
168
|
+
- Link emotions to specific moments or contexts
|
|
169
|
+
- Note intensity (mildly annoyed vs. deeply frustrated)
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
**Example:**
|
|
172
|
+
```
|
|
173
|
+
DOES:
|
|
174
|
+
- Opens mobile banking app 3-5 times per day
|
|
175
|
+
- Keeps sessions under 2 minutes (quick checks)
|
|
176
|
+
- Abandons transactions if auth takes >30 seconds
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
FEELS:
|
|
179
|
+
- Frustrated by multi-step authentication
|
|
180
|
+
- Anxious about being logged out mid-transaction
|
|
181
|
+
- Secure with biometric auth, insecure about session stability
|
|
182
|
+
```
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
---
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
### Step 4: Pain Points
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
Emma will ask you to identify 4-6 pain points with:
|
|
189
|
+
|
|
190
|
+
1. **The Pain** - What's the problem?
|
|
191
|
+
2. **The Impact** - How does it affect them?
|
|
192
|
+
3. **The Evidence** - What research supports this?
|
|
193
|
+
|
|
194
|
+
**Example:**
|
|
195
|
+
```
|
|
196
|
+
Pain #1: Multi-Step Authentication Friction
|
|
197
|
+
- Impact: Abandons transactions if auth takes >30 seconds
|
|
198
|
+
- Evidence: "I just want to check my balance quickly - why do I
|
|
199
|
+
need to enter a password AND a code from my phone?"
|
|
200
|
+
```
|
|
201
|
+
|
|
202
|
+
**Tip:** Be specific. Not "Bad UX" but "Button to create campaign is hidden in nested menu."
|
|
203
|
+
|
|
204
|
+
---
|
|
205
|
+
|
|
206
|
+
### Step 5: Gains (Desired Outcomes)
|
|
207
|
+
|
|
208
|
+
Emma will ask you to identify 4-6 gains with:
|
|
209
|
+
|
|
210
|
+
1. **The Gain** - What do they want to achieve?
|
|
211
|
+
2. **The Value** - Why does this matter to them?
|
|
212
|
+
3. **Success Metric** - How would they know they achieved it?
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
**Example:**
|
|
215
|
+
```
|
|
216
|
+
Gain #1: One-Tap Balance Check
|
|
217
|
+
- Value: Enables quick financial decisions without friction
|
|
218
|
+
- Success Metric: Can check balance in <5 seconds vs. current 30+ seconds
|
|
219
|
+
```
|
|
220
|
+
|
|
221
|
+
**Tip:** Link gains to pain points. Pain: "Data scattered across 6 tools" → Gain: "See everything in one dashboard."
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
---
|
|
224
|
+
|
|
225
|
+
### Step 6: Synthesize
|
|
226
|
+
|
|
227
|
+
Emma will:
|
|
228
|
+
1. Review all insights you've gathered
|
|
229
|
+
2. Identify key patterns and surprises
|
|
230
|
+
3. Create the final empathy map artifact
|
|
231
|
+
4. Save it to your output folder
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
**Output Location:**
|
|
234
|
+
`{project-root}/_bmad-output/design-artifacts/empathy-map-{user-name}-{date}.md`
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
**Artifact Includes:**
|
|
237
|
+
- Executive Summary (key insights)
|
|
238
|
+
- Target User Profile
|
|
239
|
+
- Says & Thinks
|
|
240
|
+
- Does & Feels
|
|
241
|
+
- Pain Points (prioritized)
|
|
242
|
+
- Desired Gains (prioritized)
|
|
243
|
+
- Design Implications
|
|
244
|
+
- Feature Prioritization Matrix
|
|
245
|
+
- Next Steps
|
|
246
|
+
|
|
247
|
+
---
|
|
248
|
+
|
|
249
|
+
## Understanding Your Empathy Map Output
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
251
|
+
### Executive Summary
|
|
252
|
+
|
|
253
|
+
**Purpose:** High-level insights for stakeholders who need the "so what?"
|
|
254
|
+
|
|
255
|
+
**What to look for:**
|
|
256
|
+
- 3-5 key insights that emerged from the data
|
|
257
|
+
- Top 3 pain points (what's broken?)
|
|
258
|
+
- Top 3 desired gains (what do they want?)
|
|
259
|
+
|
|
260
|
+
**How to use it:**
|
|
261
|
+
- Share with executives for quick alignment
|
|
262
|
+
- Reference in pitch decks and presentations
|
|
263
|
+
- Guide feature prioritization discussions
|
|
264
|
+
|
|
265
|
+
---
|
|
266
|
+
|
|
267
|
+
### Design Implications
|
|
268
|
+
|
|
269
|
+
**Purpose:** Translate insights into actionable design decisions
|
|
270
|
+
|
|
271
|
+
**What you'll find:**
|
|
272
|
+
- **Prioritize:** What to focus on first
|
|
273
|
+
- **Avoid:** What NOT to do
|
|
274
|
+
- **Focus On:** Guiding principles for design
|
|
275
|
+
|
|
276
|
+
**How to use it:**
|
|
277
|
+
- Brief designers before wireframing
|
|
278
|
+
- Validate designs against these principles
|
|
279
|
+
- Use as criteria for design reviews
|
|
280
|
+
|
|
281
|
+
---
|
|
282
|
+
|
|
283
|
+
### Feature Prioritization Matrix
|
|
284
|
+
|
|
285
|
+
**Purpose:** Map pain points to gains to design opportunities
|
|
286
|
+
|
|
287
|
+
**How to read it:**
|
|
288
|
+
|
|
289
|
+
| Pain Point | Desired Gain | Design Opportunity | Priority |
|
|
290
|
+
|------------|--------------|-------------------|----------|
|
|
291
|
+
| Multi-step auth | Seamless biometric | Face ID-only login | HIGH |
|
|
292
|
+
|
|
293
|
+
**How to use it:**
|
|
294
|
+
- Prioritize HIGH items first
|
|
295
|
+
- Use to scope MVP features
|
|
296
|
+
- Track which pain points you've addressed
|
|
297
|
+
|
|
298
|
+
---
|
|
299
|
+
|
|
300
|
+
## Chatting with Emma (CH)
|
|
301
|
+
|
|
302
|
+
Select **[CH] Chat** to have a free-form conversation with Emma about:
|
|
303
|
+
|
|
304
|
+
- Empathy mapping best practices
|
|
305
|
+
- User research methodologies
|
|
306
|
+
- Design thinking principles
|
|
307
|
+
- Jobs-to-be-Done framework
|
|
308
|
+
- Interpreting user insights
|
|
309
|
+
|
|
310
|
+
**Example questions:**
|
|
311
|
+
- "How do I know if my pain points are specific enough?"
|
|
312
|
+
- "What's the difference between what users say and think?"
|
|
313
|
+
- "How do I prioritize pain points vs. gains?"
|
|
314
|
+
|
|
315
|
+
---
|
|
316
|
+
|
|
317
|
+
## Validating an Empathy Map (VM)
|
|
318
|
+
|
|
319
|
+
Select **[VM] Validate** to review an existing empathy map against research evidence.
|
|
320
|
+
|
|
321
|
+
**When to use this:**
|
|
322
|
+
- You created an empathy map and want peer review
|
|
323
|
+
- You inherited an empathy map from another team
|
|
324
|
+
- Your research has changed and you need to update the map
|
|
325
|
+
- You're preparing to present the map to stakeholders
|
|
326
|
+
|
|
327
|
+
**What Emma checks:**
|
|
328
|
+
- Are insights backed by research evidence?
|
|
329
|
+
- Is the target user specific enough?
|
|
330
|
+
- Are pain points concrete and actionable?
|
|
331
|
+
- Are gains measurable?
|
|
332
|
+
- Can designers use this to inform decisions?
|
|
333
|
+
|
|
334
|
+
---
|
|
335
|
+
|
|
336
|
+
## Party Mode (PM)
|
|
337
|
+
|
|
338
|
+
Select **[PM] Party Mode** to bring Emma into a multi-agent collaboration session.
|
|
339
|
+
|
|
340
|
+
**When to use this:**
|
|
341
|
+
- You need multiple BMAD agents working together
|
|
342
|
+
- Example: Emma (empathy mapping) + Wade (wireframes) + Quinn (quality review)
|
|
343
|
+
|
|
344
|
+
**How it works:**
|
|
345
|
+
- Emma joins a group discussion with other agents
|
|
346
|
+
- Each agent contributes their expertise
|
|
347
|
+
- Agents collaborate naturally on complex tasks
|
|
348
|
+
|
|
349
|
+
---
|
|
350
|
+
|
|
351
|
+
## Troubleshooting
|
|
352
|
+
|
|
353
|
+
### Error: "Configuration Error: Cannot load config file"
|
|
354
|
+
|
|
355
|
+
**What it means:**
|
|
356
|
+
Emma can't find or read the config file at `_bmad/bme/_designos/config.yaml`
|
|
357
|
+
|
|
358
|
+
**How to fix:**
|
|
359
|
+
|
|
360
|
+
1. **Check if file exists:**
|
|
361
|
+
```bash
|
|
362
|
+
ls _bmad/bme/_designos/config.yaml
|
|
363
|
+
```
|
|
364
|
+
|
|
365
|
+
2. **If missing, create it:**
|
|
366
|
+
```yaml
|
|
367
|
+
---
|
|
368
|
+
submodule_name: _designos
|
|
369
|
+
description: Design-focused agents for user research and UX workflows
|
|
370
|
+
module: bme
|
|
371
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
372
|
+
|
|
373
|
+
# Output Configuration
|
|
374
|
+
output_folder: "{project-root}/_bmad-output/design-artifacts"
|
|
375
|
+
user_name: "{user}"
|
|
376
|
+
communication_language: "en"
|
|
377
|
+
|
|
378
|
+
# Agents in this submodule
|
|
379
|
+
agents:
|
|
380
|
+
- empathy-mapper
|
|
381
|
+
|
|
382
|
+
# Workflows available
|
|
383
|
+
workflows:
|
|
384
|
+
- empathy-map
|
|
385
|
+
|
|
386
|
+
# Integration
|
|
387
|
+
party_mode_enabled: true
|
|
388
|
+
core_module: bme
|
|
389
|
+
```
|
|
390
|
+
|
|
391
|
+
3. **Verify YAML syntax:**
|
|
392
|
+
- No tabs (use spaces)
|
|
393
|
+
- Proper indentation
|
|
394
|
+
- Quotes around string values
|
|
395
|
+
|
|
396
|
+
4. **If you just installed Emma:**
|
|
397
|
+
- Reinstall the bme module
|
|
398
|
+
- Or contact support
|
|
399
|
+
|
|
400
|
+
---
|
|
401
|
+
|
|
402
|
+
### Error: "Missing required field(s) in config.yaml"
|
|
403
|
+
|
|
404
|
+
**What it means:**
|
|
405
|
+
The config file exists but is missing required fields.
|
|
406
|
+
|
|
407
|
+
**Required fields:**
|
|
408
|
+
- `user_name`
|
|
409
|
+
- `communication_language`
|
|
410
|
+
- `output_folder`
|
|
411
|
+
|
|
412
|
+
**How to fix:**
|
|
413
|
+
|
|
414
|
+
1. **Open the config file:**
|
|
415
|
+
```bash
|
|
416
|
+
nano _bmad/bme/_designos/config.yaml
|
|
417
|
+
```
|
|
418
|
+
|
|
419
|
+
2. **Add missing fields:**
|
|
420
|
+
```yaml
|
|
421
|
+
output_folder: "{project-root}/_bmad-output/design-artifacts"
|
|
422
|
+
user_name: "{user}"
|
|
423
|
+
communication_language: "en"
|
|
424
|
+
```
|
|
425
|
+
|
|
426
|
+
3. **Save and retry**
|
|
427
|
+
|
|
428
|
+
---
|
|
429
|
+
|
|
430
|
+
### Error: "Unknown skill: bmad-agent-bme-empathy-mapper"
|
|
431
|
+
|
|
432
|
+
**What it means:**
|
|
433
|
+
Slash commands aren't available in your environment.
|
|
434
|
+
|
|
435
|
+
**How to fix:**
|
|
436
|
+
Use Method 2 (Direct Agent File Reading) instead:
|
|
437
|
+
|
|
438
|
+
1. Read the file: `_bmad/bme/_designos/agents/empathy-mapper.md`
|
|
439
|
+
2. Emma will activate normally
|
|
440
|
+
3. This method is fully tested and works in all environments
|
|
441
|
+
|
|
442
|
+
**Note:** This is NOT an error with Emma - it's an environment limitation.
|
|
443
|
+
|
|
444
|
+
---
|
|
445
|
+
|
|
446
|
+
### Emma won't proceed to the next step
|
|
447
|
+
|
|
448
|
+
**What it means:**
|
|
449
|
+
Emma is waiting for specific input from you.
|
|
450
|
+
|
|
451
|
+
**How to fix:**
|
|
452
|
+
|
|
453
|
+
1. **Read Emma's last message carefully** - she's asking for something specific
|
|
454
|
+
2. **Provide the requested information** - don't skip steps
|
|
455
|
+
3. **Type "continue" if you've answered her question** and she's waiting for confirmation
|
|
456
|
+
|
|
457
|
+
**Tip:** Emma follows a strict sequential workflow. You can't skip Step 2 to go to Step 4.
|
|
458
|
+
|
|
459
|
+
---
|
|
460
|
+
|
|
461
|
+
### Empathy map artifact not created
|
|
462
|
+
|
|
463
|
+
**Possible causes:**
|
|
464
|
+
|
|
465
|
+
1. **Didn't complete Step 6 (Synthesize):**
|
|
466
|
+
- Solution: Continue through all 6 steps
|
|
467
|
+
|
|
468
|
+
2. **Output folder doesn't exist:**
|
|
469
|
+
- Check: `_bmad-output/design-artifacts/` exists
|
|
470
|
+
- Solution: Create the folder if missing
|
|
471
|
+
|
|
472
|
+
3. **Permissions issue:**
|
|
473
|
+
- Check: You have write access to the output folder
|
|
474
|
+
- Solution: Fix folder permissions
|
|
475
|
+
|
|
476
|
+
---
|
|
477
|
+
|
|
478
|
+
## Best Practices
|
|
479
|
+
|
|
480
|
+
### Before You Start
|
|
481
|
+
|
|
482
|
+
1. **Gather your research:**
|
|
483
|
+
- User interview transcripts
|
|
484
|
+
- Survey responses
|
|
485
|
+
- Observational study notes
|
|
486
|
+
- Analytics data
|
|
487
|
+
- Support tickets
|
|
488
|
+
|
|
489
|
+
2. **Define your specific user:**
|
|
490
|
+
- Not "users" - pick ONE specific user type
|
|
491
|
+
- Example: "Busy working parents managing kids' schedules" not "parents"
|
|
492
|
+
|
|
493
|
+
3. **Set aside 30-60 minutes:**
|
|
494
|
+
- Don't rush - quality insights take time
|
|
495
|
+
- Better to do it right once than iterate multiple times
|
|
496
|
+
|
|
497
|
+
---
|
|
498
|
+
|
|
499
|
+
### During the Process
|
|
500
|
+
|
|
501
|
+
1. **Use direct quotes:**
|
|
502
|
+
- Not "Users said they want speed"
|
|
503
|
+
- But "I just want to check my balance quickly"
|
|
504
|
+
|
|
505
|
+
2. **Be specific about pain points:**
|
|
506
|
+
- Not "Bad UX"
|
|
507
|
+
- But "Transfer button hidden 3 levels deep in menu"
|
|
508
|
+
|
|
509
|
+
3. **Quantify when possible:**
|
|
510
|
+
- Not "Takes too long"
|
|
511
|
+
- But "Abandons after 30 seconds"
|
|
512
|
+
|
|
513
|
+
4. **Ground everything in evidence:**
|
|
514
|
+
- Link each insight to interview quotes, observations, or data
|
|
515
|
+
- If you're guessing, you don't have enough research yet
|
|
516
|
+
|
|
517
|
+
---
|
|
518
|
+
|
|
519
|
+
### After You Create the Empathy Map
|
|
520
|
+
|
|
521
|
+
1. **Validate with users:**
|
|
522
|
+
- Show the empathy map to 3-5 actual users
|
|
523
|
+
- Ask: "Does this resonate with your experience?"
|
|
524
|
+
|
|
525
|
+
2. **Share with your team:**
|
|
526
|
+
- Use Executive Summary for stakeholder buy-in
|
|
527
|
+
- Use Design Implications to brief designers
|
|
528
|
+
- Use Feature Matrix to prioritize backlog
|
|
529
|
+
|
|
530
|
+
3. **Keep it updated:**
|
|
531
|
+
- Empathy maps are living documents
|
|
532
|
+
- Update as you learn more through ongoing research
|
|
533
|
+
|
|
534
|
+
4. **Link to design decisions:**
|
|
535
|
+
- Reference the empathy map in PRDs
|
|
536
|
+
- Cite it in design reviews
|
|
537
|
+
- Use it to resolve feature debates
|
|
538
|
+
|
|
539
|
+
---
|
|
540
|
+
|
|
541
|
+
## Tips from Emma
|
|
542
|
+
|
|
543
|
+
### "Design is about THEM, not us"
|
|
544
|
+
|
|
545
|
+
Every decision must be grounded in real user insights. If you catch yourself saying "I think users want X," stop and ask: "What evidence do I have?"
|
|
546
|
+
|
|
547
|
+
### "Emotions drive behavior"
|
|
548
|
+
|
|
549
|
+
Understanding the WHY (emotions) is more important than the WHAT (actions). A user who abandons your checkout isn't just "impatient" - they might be anxious about security, overwhelmed by options, or frustrated by hidden fees.
|
|
550
|
+
|
|
551
|
+
### "Pain points reveal opportunities"
|
|
552
|
+
|
|
553
|
+
Every frustration is a solution waiting to happen. Don't just document pain points - ask "What gain would eliminate this pain?"
|
|
554
|
+
|
|
555
|
+
### "Challenge assumptions ruthlessly"
|
|
556
|
+
|
|
557
|
+
Users say one thing and do another. Look for gaps between what they SAY and what they DO. Those gaps reveal unspoken needs.
|
|
558
|
+
|
|
559
|
+
### "Validate through research, never speculate"
|
|
560
|
+
|
|
561
|
+
If you don't have research evidence, you don't have an empathy map - you have a persona fiction. Go talk to users first.
|
|
562
|
+
|
|
563
|
+
---
|
|
564
|
+
|
|
565
|
+
## FAQs
|
|
566
|
+
|
|
567
|
+
### How is this different from a user persona?
|
|
568
|
+
|
|
569
|
+
**Empathy Map:**
|
|
570
|
+
- Focused on ONE specific user in ONE specific context
|
|
571
|
+
- Organized by Says/Thinks/Does/Feels (empathy framework)
|
|
572
|
+
- Grounded in direct research evidence (quotes, observations)
|
|
573
|
+
- Reveals emotional drivers and pain points
|
|
574
|
+
- Used to inform design decisions
|
|
575
|
+
|
|
576
|
+
**User Persona:**
|
|
577
|
+
- Represents a segment of users (broader)
|
|
578
|
+
- Organized by demographics, goals, behaviors
|
|
579
|
+
- Can be research-based or assumption-based
|
|
580
|
+
- Often includes fictional narrative details
|
|
581
|
+
- Used for general alignment and communication
|
|
582
|
+
|
|
583
|
+
**When to use Emma:** When you need to deeply understand user emotions and pain points to inform design decisions.
|
|
584
|
+
|
|
585
|
+
---
|
|
586
|
+
|
|
587
|
+
### Can I create multiple empathy maps?
|
|
588
|
+
|
|
589
|
+
**Yes!** You should create separate empathy maps for:
|
|
590
|
+
- Different user types (power users vs. casual users)
|
|
591
|
+
- Different contexts (desktop vs. mobile usage)
|
|
592
|
+
- Different jobs-to-be-done (research vs. purchasing)
|
|
593
|
+
|
|
594
|
+
**Tip:** Don't try to create one empathy map for everyone. Specificity is power.
|
|
595
|
+
|
|
596
|
+
---
|
|
597
|
+
|
|
598
|
+
### How do I know if my empathy map is good?
|
|
599
|
+
|
|
600
|
+
**Good empathy maps:**
|
|
601
|
+
- ✅ Every insight traceable to research evidence (quotes, observations, data)
|
|
602
|
+
- ✅ Target user specific enough (not "users" but "34-year-old marketing managers")
|
|
603
|
+
- ✅ Pain points concrete (not "bad UX" but "can't find transfer button in menu")
|
|
604
|
+
- ✅ Gains measurable (not "faster" but "check balance in <5 seconds")
|
|
605
|
+
- ✅ Designers can use it to inform wireframes
|
|
606
|
+
- ✅ Product managers can use it to prioritize features
|
|
607
|
+
|
|
608
|
+
**Bad empathy maps:**
|
|
609
|
+
- ❌ Generic insights that could apply to anyone
|
|
610
|
+
- ❌ Speculation without evidence ("I think users feel...")
|
|
611
|
+
- ❌ Vague pain points ("needs improvement")
|
|
612
|
+
- ❌ Unmeasurable gains ("better experience")
|
|
613
|
+
|
|
614
|
+
**Emma's validation (VM) can help check this!**
|
|
615
|
+
|
|
616
|
+
---
|
|
617
|
+
|
|
618
|
+
### What if I don't have user research yet?
|
|
619
|
+
|
|
620
|
+
**Don't create an empathy map yet.**
|
|
621
|
+
|
|
622
|
+
Empathy maps require research evidence. Without it, you're creating fiction.
|
|
623
|
+
|
|
624
|
+
**Instead:**
|
|
625
|
+
1. Conduct user interviews (3-5 users minimum)
|
|
626
|
+
2. Observe users interacting with your product
|
|
627
|
+
3. Review support tickets and feedback
|
|
628
|
+
4. Analyze usage analytics
|
|
629
|
+
|
|
630
|
+
**Then** come back to Emma with your research.
|
|
631
|
+
|
|
632
|
+
---
|
|
633
|
+
|
|
634
|
+
### How long should the process take?
|
|
635
|
+
|
|
636
|
+
**With Emma:** 30-60 minutes (for one empathy map)
|
|
637
|
+
|
|
638
|
+
**Time breakdown:**
|
|
639
|
+
- Step 1 (Define User): 5 min
|
|
640
|
+
- Step 2 (Says/Thinks): 10 min
|
|
641
|
+
- Step 3 (Does/Feels): 10 min
|
|
642
|
+
- Step 4 (Pain Points): 10 min
|
|
643
|
+
- Step 5 (Gains): 10 min
|
|
644
|
+
- Step 6 (Synthesize): 5 min
|
|
645
|
+
|
|
646
|
+
**Tip:** Don't rush. Quality insights take time to extract from research.
|
|
647
|
+
|
|
648
|
+
---
|
|
649
|
+
|
|
650
|
+
### Can I edit the empathy map after Emma creates it?
|
|
651
|
+
|
|
652
|
+
**Yes!** The output is a markdown file. You can:
|
|
653
|
+
- Edit it directly in any text editor
|
|
654
|
+
- Add new insights as you learn more
|
|
655
|
+
- Update priorities as business needs change
|
|
656
|
+
- Add screenshots or diagrams
|
|
657
|
+
|
|
658
|
+
**Best practice:** Track versions if you make major changes.
|
|
659
|
+
|
|
660
|
+
---
|
|
661
|
+
|
|
662
|
+
## Getting Help
|
|
663
|
+
|
|
664
|
+
### Need help using Emma?
|
|
665
|
+
|
|
666
|
+
1. **Chat with Emma (CH):** Ask her questions about empathy mapping
|
|
667
|
+
2. **Read this guide:** Most questions are answered here
|
|
668
|
+
3. **Check troubleshooting section:** Common errors and solutions
|
|
669
|
+
|
|
670
|
+
### Found a bug or issue?
|
|
671
|
+
|
|
672
|
+
1. **Check if it's an environment limitation:** Some features (like slash commands) may not work in all environments
|
|
673
|
+
2. **Report the issue:** Provide Emma's version (1.0.0), your environment, and steps to reproduce
|
|
674
|
+
|
|
675
|
+
### Want to learn more about empathy mapping?
|
|
676
|
+
|
|
677
|
+
**Emma's expertise includes:**
|
|
678
|
+
- Empathy mapping frameworks
|
|
679
|
+
- Jobs-to-be-Done methodology
|
|
680
|
+
- Emotional journey mapping
|
|
681
|
+
- Human-centered design principles
|
|
682
|
+
- User research best practices
|
|
683
|
+
|
|
684
|
+
**Ask Emma (CH) about any of these topics!**
|
|
685
|
+
|
|
686
|
+
---
|
|
687
|
+
|
|
688
|
+
## Version History
|
|
689
|
+
|
|
690
|
+
**v1.0.0 (2026-02-14)**
|
|
691
|
+
- Initial release
|
|
692
|
+
- 6-step empathy mapping workflow
|
|
693
|
+
- Config-driven personalization
|
|
694
|
+
- Comprehensive error handling
|
|
695
|
+
- Validation workflow (VM)
|
|
696
|
+
- Party mode integration (PM)
|
|
697
|
+
|
|
698
|
+
---
|
|
699
|
+
|
|
700
|
+
## Credits
|
|
701
|
+
|
|
702
|
+
**Agent:** Emma (empathy-mapper)
|
|
703
|
+
**Module:** BMAD Enhanced (bme)
|
|
704
|
+
**Submodule:** DesignOS (_designos)
|
|
705
|
+
**Framework:** BMAD Agent Architecture Framework v1.1.0
|
|
706
|
+
**Testing:** P0 test suite (18/18 passed - 100%)
|
|
707
|
+
|
|
708
|
+
---
|
|
709
|
+
|
|
710
|
+
**Questions?** Chat with Emma (CH) - she's here to help! 🎨
|