bluera-knowledge 0.13.0 → 0.13.1

package/docs/plans/2024-12-17-ai-search-quality-testing-design.md

@@ -1,201 +0,0 @@
-# AI-Powered Search Quality Testing
-
-## Overview
-
-A two-phase evaluation system where Claude CLI both generates test queries and judges search result quality, producing structured feedback to drive search improvements.
-
-## Goals
-
-- **Comprehensive evaluation**: Score relevance, ranking, coverage, and snippet quality
-- **Actionable feedback**: Detailed analysis and specific improvement suggestions
-- **Trend tracking**: JSONL output for monitoring quality over time
-- **Self-evolving**: AI generates queries from actual indexed content
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-```
-npm run test:search-quality
-    │
-    ├─► Phase 1: Query Generation
-    │   └─► Claude explores tests/fixtures/ directory
-    │   └─► Generates 10-15 diverse test queries
-    │
-    ├─► Phase 2: Search & Evaluation
-    │   └─► For each query:
-    │       ├─► Run bkbsearch
-    │       └─► Claude evaluates results (scores + analysis + suggestions)
-    │
-    └─► Output: tests/quality-results/2024-12-17T10-30-00.jsonl
-```
-
-## File Structure
-
-```
-tests/
-├── quality-config.json          # Configuration
-├── quality-results/             # JSONL output files
-│   └── .gitkeep
-└── scripts/
-    └── search-quality.ts        # Main test runner
-```
-
-## Configuration
-
-`tests/quality-config.json`:
-```json
-{
-  "queryCount": 15,
-  "searchLimit": 10,
-  "searchMode": "hybrid",
-  "stores": null
-}
-```
-
-- `queryCount`: Number of queries Claude generates (default: 15)
-- `searchLimit`: Max results per search (default: 10)
-- `searchMode`: vector | fts | hybrid (default: hybrid)
-- `stores`: Specific stores to test, or null for all
-
-## Output Format
-
-Each line in the JSONL file represents one query evaluation:
-
-```json
-{
-  "timestamp": "2024-12-17T10:30:00.000Z",
-  "query": "JWT token refresh implementation",
-  "queryIntent": "Find code handling JWT refresh token logic",
-  "searchMode": "hybrid",
-  "resultCount": 10,
-  "scores": {
-    "relevance": 0.85,
-    "ranking": 0.70,
-    "coverage": 0.90,
-    "snippetQuality": 0.75,
-    "overall": 0.80
-  },
-  "analysis": {
-    "relevance": "8/10 results directly relate to JWT tokens. Results #6 and #9 are about general auth headers, not JWT specifically.",
-    "ranking": "Top result is OAuth flow, not JWT refresh. jwt-auth.ts with refreshToken function should rank #1 but is #3.",
-    "coverage": "Found the main JWT implementation. Minor gap: didn't surface the token expiry handling in error-handling.ts.",
-    "snippetQuality": "Snippets are readable but some cut off mid-function. Result #4 snippet doesn't show the most relevant code section."
-  },
-  "suggestions": [
-    "Improve semantic distinction between 'refresh token' (JWT concept) vs 'OAuth refresh' (flow type)",
-    "Consider boosting exact function name matches - 'refreshToken' function exists but ranks below partial matches",
-    "Chunk boundaries may be splitting functions - review chunking strategy for code files"
-  ],
-  "results": [
-    {"rank": 1, "source": "oauth-flow.ts", "score": -0.23, "relevant": true},
-    {"rank": 2, "source": "jwt-auth.ts", "score": -0.31, "relevant": true}
-  ]
-}
-```
-
-**End-of-file summary** (last line):
-```json
-{
-  "type": "summary",
-  "timestamp": "2024-12-17T10:30:45.000Z",
-  "totalQueries": 15,
-  "averageScores": {
-    "relevance": 0.82,
-    "ranking": 0.68,
-    "coverage": 0.85,
-    "snippetQuality": 0.71,
-    "overall": 0.77
-  },
-  "topIssues": ["Ranking of exact matches", "Code chunk boundaries", "Semantic disambiguation"],
-  "recommendedFocus": "Ranking algorithm - exact and function name matches consistently rank lower than expected"
-}
-```
-
-## Implementation Approach
-
-### Phase 1: Query Generation
-
-```bash
-claude -p --output-format json --json-schema '...' \
-  "Explore tests/fixtures/ to understand the indexed content,
-   then generate ${queryCount} diverse search queries..."
-```
-
-Claude uses Glob/Read tools to browse fixtures, understands content types (auth code, API docs, READMEs), and generates queries that meaningfully test search.
-
-### Phase 2: Per-Query Evaluation
-
-```bash
-bkbsearch "JWT refresh" --include-content | \
-  claude -p --output-format json --json-schema '...' \
-  "Evaluate these search results for the query 'JWT refresh'..."
-```
-
-Pipes actual search results to Claude for evaluation against the JSON schema.
-
-### npm Script
-
-```json
-{
-  "scripts": {
-    "test:search-quality": "npx tsx tests/scripts/search-quality.ts"
-  }
-}
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### Claude CLI Failures
-- **Rate limits**: Retry with exponential backoff (max 3 retries)
-- **Invalid JSON**: Log raw response to stderr, skip query, continue
-- **Timeout**: 60s per CLI call, `--max-budget-usd 0.50` safety cap
-
-### Search Failures
-- **Empty results**: Evaluate as valid feedback (coverage = 0)
-- **Store not found**: Fail fast with clear error
-- **Malformed output**: Log, skip, include in summary as "evaluation failed"
-
-### Output Handling
-- **Directory missing**: Create automatically
-- **Partial run (Ctrl+C)**: Write completed evaluations immediately
-- **Duplicate timestamps**: Append milliseconds suffix
-
-### AI Evaluation Edge Cases
-- **Ambiguous queries**: Flag in analysis ("query could mean X or Y")
-- **All results relevant**: Valid outcome, high scores
-- **No fixtures indexed**: Detect early, abort with helpful message
-
-## Console Output
-
-```
-🔍 Generating test queries from tests/fixtures/...
-✓ Generated 15 queries
-
-📊 Evaluating search quality...
-  [1/15] "JWT token refresh" - overall: 0.80
-  [2/15] "error handling middleware" - overall: 0.85
-  ...
-  [15/15] "database repository pattern" - overall: 0.72
-
-✓ Results written to tests/quality-results/2024-12-17T10-30-00.jsonl
-📈 Average overall score: 0.77
-```
-
-## Score Dimensions
-
-| Dimension | Description |
-|-----------|-------------|
-| **Relevance** | Do results actually relate to the query intent? |
-| **Ranking** | Are the most relevant results at the top? |
-| **Coverage** | Did the search find all expected matches? |
-| **Snippet Quality** | Are snippets readable and showing relevant sections? |
-| **Overall** | Weighted combination of all dimensions |
-
-## Usage for Improvements
-
-The detailed feedback enables:
-
-1. **Identify patterns**: Run multiple times, aggregate `topIssues` across runs
-2. **Track regressions**: Compare `averageScores` between runs after changes
-3. **Prioritize work**: `recommendedFocus` highlights highest-impact improvements
-4. **Debug specific issues**: `analysis` explains exactly why scores are low
-5. **Validate fixes**: Re-run after changes to confirm improvements