blockyard 0.0.1 → 0.0.9

package/server/netinfo.js

@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+// Which address this process is willing to be reached on, and what to say when it
+// can't be. Kept separate from the HTTP layer because the answers are boot-time
+// facts about the machine, not about requests -- and because a failed bind used to
+// surface as a raw Node stack trace, which tells you nothing about the one question
+// that matters: which address did you ask for, and which ones does this box have?
+import os from 'node:os';
+
+export function networkInterfaces(over = null) {
+  return over ?? os.networkInterfaces();
+}
+
+// Every unicast address the kernel actually has, as { name, address, family }.
+export function localAddresses(ifaces = networkInterfaces()) {
+  const out = [];
+  for (const [name, list] of Object.entries(ifaces ?? {})) {
+    for (const a of list ?? []) {
+      if (a.internal && a.family !== 'IPv4') continue;
+      out.push({ name, address: a.address, family: a.family, internal: !!a.internal });
+    }
+  }
+  return out;
+}
+
+export function hasAddress(addr, ifaces = networkInterfaces()) {
+  if (addr === '0.0.0.0' || addr === '::' || addr === '*' || addr == null) return true;
+  const target = String(addr).replace(/^\[|\]$/g, '');
+  const addrs = localAddresses(ifaces).map((a) => a.address.replace(/^\[|\]$/g, ''));
+  if (addrs.includes(target)) return true;
+  // `localhost` and 127.0.0.1 / ::1 are always bindable, present or not in the list.
+  if (target === 'localhost' || target === '127.0.0.1' || target === '::1') return true;
+  return false;
+}
+
+// Is the configured bind an address literal (or localhost)? A hostname here fails at
+// listen() with a message about names, and after a reboot with a changed DNS it can
+// fail at the worst possible moment, so it is worth refusing at load instead.
+export function isBindableHost(host) {
+  if (host == null || host === '') return true;
+  const h = String(host).replace(/^\[|\]$/g, '');
+  if (h === 'localhost' || h === '0.0.0.0' || h === '::' || h === '*') return true;
+  if (/^\d{1,3}(\.\d{1,3}){3}$/.test(h)) {
+    return h.split('.').every((p) => Number(p) <= 255);
+  }
+  if (h.includes(':')) return /^[0-9a-fA-F:.%]+$/.test(h);
+  return false;
+}
+
+
+/**
+ * Split a bind configuration into addresses, and say which this machine can take.
+ *
+ * Multiple addresses are supported because one socket cannot express "LAN and the
+ * tunnel, but not the container bridges and not loopback" -- and because the
+ * single-address version of this locked the operator out: their browser arrives over
+ * the tailnet, and a LAN-only bind is unreachable from the tailnet (the tailnet does
+ * not advertise 192.0.2.0/24 here).
+ *
+ * Missing addresses are reported, not fatal: a tunnel interface that is not up yet at
+ * boot (tailscaled starting after the network) must not keep the monitor from
+ * serving the interfaces that ARE present. Only "none of them work" is fatal.
+ */
+export function planBinds(hosts, ifaces = networkInterfaces()) {
+  const list = (Array.isArray(hosts) ? hosts : String(hosts ?? '0.0.0.0').split(','))
+    .map((h) => String(h).trim())
+    .filter(Boolean);
+  const bindable = [];
+  const missing = [];
+  for (const h of list) (hasAddress(h, ifaces) ? bindable : missing).push(h);
+  return { list, bindable, missing, noneUsable: bindable.length === 0 };
+}
+
+/**
+ * A human-readable explanation of a failed or impossible bind.
+ *
+ * The point is not politeness. Binding to one address is a decision with casualties
+ * (loopback healthchecks, other interfaces, a DHCP address that moved), and an
+ * operator staring at `EADDRNOTAVAIL` should not have to reconstruct that.
+ */
+export function bindProblemMessage({ err, host, port, ifaces = networkInterfaces() }) {
+  const code = err?.code ?? '';
+  const have = localAddresses(ifaces).filter((a) => a.family === 'IPv4');
+  const listed = have.map((a) => `${a.address} (${a.name})`).join(', ') || 'no unicast IPv4 at all';
+  const where = 'config/local.json → server.host, or BLOCKYARD_BIND';
+
+  if (code === 'EADDRNOTAVAIL') {
+    return `cannot bind http://${host}:${port} — this machine has no address ${host}. `
+      + `Addresses present: ${listed}. If the interface or its lease changed, update ${where} `
+      + `(or set 0.0.0.0 to accept every interface, which serves whatever the box has, including tunnels).`;
+  }
+  if (code === 'EACCES') {
+    return `cannot bind ${host}:${port} — permission denied. Ports below 1024 need privileges; `
+      + `use a high port (21000) or a reverse proxy in front.`;
+  }
+  if (code === 'EADDRINUSE') {
+    const same = have.some((a) => a.address === host);
+    return `cannot bind ${host}:${port} — something is already listening there. `
+      + (same
+        ? `The address is one of ours, so this is likely a second instance of this monitor: stop the other one (or point this one at another port).`
+        : `${host} is not this machine's own address, so a different process or a container owns it.`)
+      + ` Address list: ${listed}.`;
+  }
+  return `cannot bind ${host}:${port}${code ? ` (${code})` : ''}${err?.message ? `: ${err.message}` : ''}. `
+    + `Addresses present: ${listed}. Override with ${where}.`;
+}
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------- CIDR membership
+//
+// This replaces prefix-TEXT matching, which over-permitted. `ipAllowed` used to
+// compare `net.split('::')[0]` against the start of the client's address string,
+// so `2001:db8:1::/48` accepted `2001:db8:1f::1` -- an address 14 bits outside the
+// network -- because "2001:db8:1f::1" starts with the characters "2001:db8:1".
+// Text has no idea where a nibble ends. This version parses both families to
+// bytes and compares bit by bit.
+//
+// Malformed input fails CLOSED here: an entry that cannot be parsed can never
+// admit a client, and `server.allowCidrs` is validated at config load, so a typo
+// stops the boot rather than quietly widening (or narrowing) the gate.
+
+/** Parse an IPv4 or IPv6 literal to bytes. Returns {family, bytes} or null. */
+export function parseIp(input) {
+  if (typeof input !== 'string') return null;
+  let s = input.trim().replace(/^\[|\]$/g, '');
+  const zone = s.indexOf('%');
+  if (zone >= 0) s = s.slice(0, zone); // %eth0 is a scope, not part of the address
+  if (!s) return null;
+  if (s.includes(':')) return parseIpv6(s);
+  return parseIpv4(s);
+}
+
+function parseIpv4(s) {
+  const parts = s.split('.');
+  if (parts.length !== 4) return null;
+  const bytes = [];
+  for (const p of parts) {
+    if (!/^\d{1,3}$/.test(p)) return null;
+    const n = Number(p);
+    if (n > 255) return null;
+    bytes.push(n);
+  }
+  return { family: 'ipv4', bytes: new Uint8Array(bytes) };
+}
+
+function parseIpv6(s) {
+  if (s.includes(':::')) return null; // ':::' is not compression, it is a typo
+  // Trailing IPv4 form (`::ffff:192.0.2.7`) occupies the low 4 bytes.
+  const tail4 = /:\d{1,3}(?:\.\d{1,3}){3}$/.test(s);
+  let head = s;
+  let tailBytes = null;
+  if (tail4) {
+    const i = s.lastIndexOf(':');
+    const v4 = parseIpv4(s.slice(i + 1));
+    if (!v4) return null;
+    tailBytes = v4.bytes;
+    head = s.slice(0, i + 1) + '0'; // placeholder group, overwritten below
+  }
+  const halves = head.split('::');
+  if (halves.length > 2) return null;
+  const expand = (chunk) => {
+    if (chunk === '') return [];
+    const groups = chunk.split(':').filter((g) => g !== '');
+    const out = [];
+    for (const g of groups) {
+      if (!/^[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}$/.test(g)) return null;
+      out.push(Number.parseInt(g, 16));
+    }
+    return out;
+  };
+  let groups;
+  if (halves.length === 2) {
+    const left = expand(halves[0]);
+    const right = expand(halves[1]);
+    if (!left || !right) return null;
+    if (left.length + right.length > 7) return null; // '::' must stand for >=1 group
+    groups = [...left, ...new Array(8 - left.length - right.length).fill(0), ...right];
+  } else {
+    const only = expand(halves[0]);
+    if (!only) return null;
+    if (only.length !== 8) return null; // no '::' means all eight groups are required
+    groups = only;
+  }
+  const bytes = new Uint8Array(16);
+  groups.forEach((g, i) => { bytes[i * 2] = (g >> 8) & 0xff; bytes[i * 2 + 1] = g & 0xff; });
+  if (tailBytes) bytes.set(tailBytes, 12);
+  return { family: 'ipv6', bytes };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Parse one allowlist entry: a bare address (implies /32 or /128) or `addr/bits`.
+ * Returns {ok:true, family, bytes, bits, text} or {ok:false, reason}.
+ */
+export function parseCidr(entry) {
+  const text = String(entry ?? '').trim();
+  if (!text) return { ok: false, reason: 'empty entry' };
+  const slash = text.indexOf('/');
+  const addrText = slash < 0 ? text : text.slice(0, slash);
+  const parsed = parseIp(addrText);
+  if (!parsed) return { ok: false, reason: `"${addrText}" is not an IPv4 or IPv6 address` };
+  const full = parsed.family === 'ipv4' ? 32 : 128;
+  let bits = full;
+  if (slash >= 0) {
+    const raw = text.slice(slash + 1);
+    if (!/^\d{1,3}$/.test(raw)) return { ok: false, reason: `"${raw}" is not a prefix length` };
+    bits = Number(raw);
+    if (bits > full) return { ok: false, reason: `/${bits} is wider than an ${parsed.family} address (${full} bits)` };
+  }
+  return { ok: true, family: parsed.family, bytes: parsed.bytes, bits, text };
+}
+
+/** Bit-exact membership of one address in one network. */
+export function inNetwork(ipBytes, netBytes, bits) {
+  if (ipBytes.length !== netBytes.length) return false; // v4 never matches a v6 net, and vice versa
+  for (let i = 0; i < bits; i += 8) {
+    const take = Math.min(8, bits - i);
+    const mask = take === 8 ? 0xff : (0xff << (8 - take)) & 0xff;
+    if ((ipBytes[i / 8] & mask) !== (netBytes[i / 8] & mask)) return false;
+  }
+  return true;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Is `ip` admitted by `cidrs`? Empty/absent list admits everything (the gate is
+ * opt-in). Returns a decision with the reason, because "403 from this address"
+ * with no explanation costs an afternoon: the message names the entry that
+ * matched, or that the list holds only families the client is not in.
+ */
+export function ipDecision(ip, cidrs = []) {
+  if (!cidrs.length) return { allowed: true, reason: 'no allowCidrs configured' };
+  const parsedIp = parseIp(ip);
+  if (!parsedIp) return { allowed: false, reason: `client address "${ip}" could not be parsed, so nothing can be admitted` };
+  const bad = [];
+  let familyMismatch = true;
+  for (const entry of cidrs) {
+    const net = parseCidr(entry);
+    if (!net.ok) { bad.push(`${entry} (${net.reason})`); continue; }
+    if (net.family !== parsedIp.family) continue;
+    familyMismatch = false;
+    if (inNetwork(parsedIp.bytes, net.bytes, net.bits)) {
+      return { allowed: true, matched: net.text, reason: `matched ${net.text}` };
+    }
+  }
+  const why = bad.length
+    ? `malformed entries are never permissive: ${bad.join('; ')}`
+    : familyMismatch
+      ? `the allowlist holds only ${[...new Set(cidrs.map((c) => parseCidr(c).family).filter(Boolean))].join('/') || 'nothing parseable'}; the client is ${parsedIp.family}`
+      : `not inside any of: ${cidrs.join(', ')}`;
+  return { allowed: false, reason: why, malformed: bad };
+}
+
+/** Boolean form, kept for call sites that only branch. */
+export function ipAllowed(ip, cidrs = []) {
+  return ipDecision(ip, cidrs).allowed;
+}
+

package/server/rpc/allowlist.js

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+// Which RPCs the web UI may call. Default DENY.
+//
+// A prefix rule like "starts with get" would be a hole, not a guard: this node's
+// own docs (docs/RPC_LIVE_NODE.md) record that `getnewaddress` and
+// `getrawchangeaddress` derive and persist new wallet keys, and that
+// `rescanblockchain` blocks every other RPC for its duration on a server that
+// services one connection at a time. So the rules are:
+//
+//   1. an explicit deny list of mutating and expensive methods, checked first;
+//   2. then an allow list of read-shaped prefixes;
+//   3. anything unknown is denied, and the reply says what to change to allow it.
+//
+// Node write operations are not in this file at all: they live behind
+// config.actions.allow and are audited. See http/api.js action routes.
+
+// Mutating, wallet-changing, or file-writing. Checked before the allow prefixes.
+const DENY_EXACT = new Set([
+  // wallet key/materialization -- "get" prefix notwithstanding
+  'getnewaddress', 'getrawchangeaddress', 'keypoolrefill', 'addhdkey',
+  // spends and broadcasts
+  'sendtoaddress', 'sendmany', 'send', 'sendall', 'sendrawtransaction', 'submitpackage',
+  'walletcreatefundedpsbt', 'fundrawtransaction', 'bumpfee', 'psbtbumpfee', 'signrawtransactionwithwallet',
+  // wallet state
+  'walletpassphrase', 'walletlock', 'walletpassphrasechange', 'encryptwallet', 'setlabel',
+  'importprivkey', 'importaddress', 'importpublickey', 'importdescriptors', 'importmempool',
+  'importmulti', 'importprunedfunds', 'removeprunedfunds', 'createwallet', 'loadwallet',
+  'unloadwallet', 'restorewallet', 'migratewallet', 'setwalletflag', 'backupwallet',
+  'exportwatchonlywallet', 'abandontransaction', 'lockunspent', 'sethdseed', 'settxfee',
+  'signmessage', 'signrawtransactionwithkey', 'walletprocesspsbt', 'descriptorprocesspsbt',
+  // peer / network control (the node documents these as worker-channel mutators)
+  'addnode', 'removeaddednode', 'disconnectnode', 'setban', 'clearbanned', 'setnetworkactive', 'ping',
+  // chain / storage mutators
+  'invalidateblock', 'reconsiderblock', 'preciousblock', 'pruneblockchain', 'submitblock',
+  'submitheader', 'stop', 'savemempool', 'dumptxoutset', 'loadtxoutset', 'simulateutxo',
+  // heavy reads that monopolise a single-threaded RPC server
+  'rescanblockchain', 'scanblocks', 'scantxoutset', 'getdescriptoractivity', 'verifychain',
+  // can switch logging off; the node refuses the mutating form anyway
+  'logging',
+]);
+
+// Bitcoin Core's own read verbs, and nothing else: an earlier node this was written against
+// namespaced its own commands with a vendor prefix, and those prefixes were admitted here by
+// read verb. That node is not supported (2026-09-14), and its prefixes are gone with it -- a
+// prefix nobody uses is a hole waiting for a name.
+const ALLOW_PREFIXES = ['get', 'list', 'estimate', 'verify', 'estimat', 'help', 'uptime', 'decoderaw', 'decodescript', 'createraw', 'analyzepsbt', 'decodepsbt', 'convertbits', 'getrpcinfo'];
+
+// Explicitly not allowed even though they look read-shaped: they build or sign
+// transactions, which is a write in every way that matters.
+const DENY_PREFIXES = ['generate', 'invalidate', 'reconsider', 'import', 'send', 'set', 'unload', 'load', 'sign'];
+
+export function classifyMethod(method) {
+  if (typeof method !== 'string' || !method) return { allowed: false, kind: 'unknown', reason: 'method name must be a string' };
+  if (DENY_EXACT.has(method)) return { allowed: false, kind: 'write-or-heavy', reason: 'this method mutates state or monopolises the node\'s single-threaded RPC server' };
+  for (const p of DENY_PREFIXES) if (method.startsWith(p) && !ALLOW_PREFIXES.includes(method)) return { allowed: false, kind: 'write', reason: `method starts with "${p}" and is treated as a mutation` };
+  if (method === 'help' || method === 'uptime' || method === 'stop') {
+    return method === 'stop'
+      ? { allowed: false, kind: 'write', reason: 'stop shuts the node down; not exposed to the web UI' }
+      : { allowed: true, kind: 'read' };
+  }
+  for (const p of ALLOW_PREFIXES) if (method.startsWith(p)) return { allowed: true, kind: 'read' };
+  return { allowed: false, kind: 'unknown', reason: 'not recognised as a read-only method; add it to server/rpc/allowlist.js if this is wrong' };
+}
+
+// Methods the node itself documents as refusing (or as needing the worker
+// channel). Surfaced so the UI can label a refusal as expected rather than as a
+// monitor bug. Lifted from docs/RPC_LIVE_NODE.md's refusal catalogue.
+export const NODE_REFUSES = new Set([
+  'loadtxoutset', 'getopenrpcinfo', 'rpc.discover', 'exportasmap', 'enumeratesigners',
+  'walletdisplayaddress', 'getmempoolcluster', 'getblockfrompeer', 'preciousblock',
+  'pruneblockchain', 'submitheader', 'getblockfilter',
+]);
+
+export function allowlistSummary() {
+  return {
+    denyExactCount: DENY_EXACT.size,
+    allowPrefixes: [...new Set(ALLOW_PREFIXES)].sort(),
+    denyPrefixes: [...new Set(DENY_PREFIXES)].sort(),
+    defaultDecision: 'deny',
+  };
+}
+
+// Actions the operator can explicitly opt into. Each must appear in
+// config.actions.allow to be reachable at all.
+export const ACTIONS = {
+  broadcast: {
+    method: 'sendrawtransaction',
+    label: 'Broadcast a raw transaction',
+    role: 'operator',
+    args: ['hexstring', 'maxfeerate?'],
+    note: 'Pushes a signed transaction to the node, which relays it to every live peer leg. Irreversible once relayed.',
+  },
+  savemempool: {
+    method: 'savemempool',
+    label: 'Persist the mempool to mempool.dat',
+    role: 'operator',
+    args: [],
+    note: 'Writes mempool.dat in Core\'s format. The node refuses if persistence is disabled.',
+  },
+  testmempoolaccept: {
+    method: 'testmempoolaccept',
+    label: 'Dry-run a transaction against mempool policy',
+    role: 'viewer',
+    args: ['rawtxs', 'maxfeerate?'],
+    note: 'Runs the identical consensus and policy validation, stopping at the commit boundary. Accepts a package.',
+  },
+  verifychain_l1: {
+    method: 'verifychain',
+    label: 'Verify block data (checklevel <= 2)',
+    role: 'admin',
+    args: ['checklevel', 'checkdepth'],
+    fixed: [2, 6],
+    note: 'Levels 0-2 re-read and re-hash block data and check the merkle root. Levels 3-4 are refused by the node because they would disconnect and reconnect blocks.',
+  },
+};
+
+export function actionAllowed(cfg, name, role) {
+  const def = ACTIONS[name];
+  if (!def) return { ok: false, reason: `unknown action "${name}"` };
+  if (!cfg.actions.enabled) return { ok: false, reason: 'node actions are disabled (set BLOCKYARD_ENABLE_ACTIONS=1 and list BLOCKYARD_ACTIONS)' };
+  // With accounts off there is no role to check, so the role gate below is vacuous
+  // and every listed action would be reachable by whoever can open a socket. Writes
+  // therefore need a second, explicit acknowledgement in open mode.
+  if (!cfg.auth.enabled && !cfg.actions.allowWritesWithoutAuth) {
+    return { ok: false, reason: 'accounts are off, so there is no identity to hold a node write accountable (enable BLOCKYARD_AUTH=1, or BLOCKYARD_ALLOW_WRITES_WITHOUT_AUTH=1 deliberately)' };
+  }
+  if (!cfg.actions.allow.includes(name)) return { ok: false, reason: `"${name}" is not in config.actions.allow` };
+  const rank = { viewer: 0, operator: 1, admin: 2 };
+  if ((rank[role] ?? -1) < (rank[def.role] ?? 99)) return { ok: false, reason: `action "${name}" needs role ${def.role}` };
+  return { ok: true, def };
+}