blitzstrike 1.0.75 → 1.0.76

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -5,6 +5,16 @@ All notable changes to Blitz Strike are documented here.
5
5
  The format follows [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
6
6
  and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/).
7
7
 
8
+ ## [1.0.76] — 2026-09-13
9
+
10
+ ### Changed — native plan + sub-agent orchestration doctrine
11
+
12
+ - `bs-orchestrate-engagement` now instructs the driving agent to use its
13
+ platform's native planning + delegation (e.g. Hermes `plan`/`todo` +
14
+ `delegate_task`) to run the engagement in parallel — recon / analyze /
15
+ deep-classes as sub-agents, then collect → verify → report — instead of
16
+ serial tool calls.
17
+
8
18
  ## [1.0.75] — 2026-09-13
9
19
 
10
20
  ### Added — plan checklist in the engagement banner
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "blitzstrike",
3
- "version": "1.0.75",
3
+ "version": "1.0.76",
4
4
  "description": "Blitz Strike — a universal MCP security-audit toolbelt. BLITZ sweeps the attack surface, EAGLE-EYE traces source-to-sink, STRIKE verifies live. 57 attack chains, 130-tool catalog, intelligence data layer. One server, every agent.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "bin": {
@@ -37,6 +37,30 @@ deterministic MCP tools; never guess a finding — produce it from tool output.
37
37
 
38
38
  6. **Report.** Emit `generate_report` + `cvss_score` + `write-report`.
39
39
 
40
+ ## Orchestration pattern (native plan + sub-agents)
41
+
42
+ You are the orchestrator — use your platform's native planning and delegation
43
+ mechanisms (e.g. Hermes `plan`/`todo` + `delegate_task`) to run the engagement
44
+ in parallel, instead of serial tool calls. This is what makes the flow
45
+ no-babysitting, not a single `run_engagement` call:
46
+
47
+ 1. **Plan.** Lay out the stages as a todo/plan: scope → recon → analyze →
48
+ verify → review → report. Assign each independent workstream to a sub-agent.
49
+ 2. **Delegate (parallel).** Spawn sub-agents for independent workstreams:
50
+ - *Recon* → `blitz_scan` + `live_recon` + `detect_framework` + `list_chains`.
51
+ - *Analyze* → `eagle_eye2` + `taint_scan` + `trace_data_flow` (source→sink).
52
+ - *Deep classes* → `complex_scan` (POP/type-juggling/mass-assignment) +
53
+ `route_scan` (route confusion).
54
+ Each sub-agent returns deterministic findings — give it the target, the
55
+ exact tools to call, and require evidence (file:line, sink, chain), never prose.
56
+ 3. **Collect + verify.** Merge sub-agent findings, `dedup_findings` by root
57
+ cause, then prove each hypothesis with `strike_verify` (baseline + marker +
58
+ negative control) before it becomes a finding.
59
+ 4. **Report.** `generate_report` + `cvss_score` + `write-report`.
60
+
61
+ Announce the takeover banner and progress (`blitz_status`) between steps so the
62
+ user sees you working, not a silent tool call.
63
+
40
64
  ## The skill chain (load the right one per phase)
41
65
 
42
66
  | Phase | Skill |