bitfab-cli 0.2.466 → 0.2.468

package/dist/index.js

@@ -29255,7 +29255,7 @@ var generateTraceAssertions = {
 var saveTraceAssertions = {
   name: "save_trace_assertions",
   title: "Save Trace Assertions",
-  description: `Record what SHOULD happen when this trace is replayed. Bitfab stores two kinds of label on a trace. A VERDICT says how a run that already happened turned out, and that is save_agent_labels / save_human_labels. An ASSERTION, which is what this tool writes, says what a correct run looks like for THIS specific input, carries no pass/fail of its own, and is checked against a later replay once a reviewer approves it. A trace holds any number of assertions, and each verdict is recorded on one of them. Call it when the user describes the right answer for a particular case, for example "this booking should have picked the 6am flight, not the 9am". This is not a verdict on a run that already happened, which is save_agent_labels, and it is not a check that applies to every trace of a function, which is save_grader. Pass \`assertion\` plus optional \`passCriteria\` / \`failCriteria\`, the same trio save_grader takes, so an assertion that proves out across many traces can later be promoted into a grader with no rewriting. \`humanNote\` stores people-only context on the assertion; preserve and return it, but never use it to judge whether a replay passed. \`assigneeEmail\` names the member who should review it, which routes the assertion to that person without deciding anything, so it never changes the approval state. Pass an entry's \`id\` to edit an existing assertion, or omit it to add a new one, so two callers adding different assertions to one trace never overwrite each other. What this tool writes is saved awaiting review, so nothing checks it yet; a reviewer approves it, in Bitfab or with \`approvalState\` on a later call here, and from then on every replay of the trace is judged against it. \`approvalState\` decides an assertion that already exists, so deciding one is \`{ id, approvalState }\` with nothing else: an omitted \`assertion\` keeps the current wording. It is refused on a new assertion, so the call that invents a claim is never the call that puts it into force. One decision covers the assertion and the category it is filed under, so set \`category_id\` and \`approvalState\` in the same entry when you are deciding both; recategorizing on a later call without deciding returns it to not reviewed, since the approval covered the old category. What it gates is whether replays check the assertion at all, so decide from the assertion and the spans it cites rather than from memory of having written it. Rewording an assertion, or changing its criteria, target, or category, returns it to not reviewed unless the same call says otherwise. Call get_trace_assertions first to find the assertion to edit and to avoid creating a duplicate, and read them back before judging a replay, where it lists the approved ones by default. Pass it \`approvalStates: ["pending"]\` to read back drafts awaiting review, including the ones you just wrote. Up to ${MAX_ASSERTIONS_PER_REQUEST} per call.`,
+  description: `Record what SHOULD happen when this trace is replayed. Bitfab stores two kinds of label on a trace. A VERDICT says how a run that already happened turned out, and that is save_agent_labels / save_human_labels. An ASSERTION, which is what this tool writes, says what a correct run looks like for THIS specific input, carries no pass/fail of its own, and is checked against a later replay once a reviewer approves it. A trace holds any number of assertions, and each verdict is recorded on one of them. Call it when the user describes the right answer for a particular case, for example "this booking should have picked the 6am flight, not the 9am". This is not a verdict on a run that already happened, which is save_agent_labels, and it is not a check that applies to every trace of a function, which is save_grader. Pass \`assertion\` plus optional \`passCriteria\` / \`failCriteria\`, the same trio save_grader takes, so an assertion that proves out across many traces can later be promoted into a grader with no rewriting. \`humanNote\` stores people-only context on the assertion; preserve and return it, but never use it to judge whether a replay passed. \`assigneeEmail\` names the member who should review it, which routes the assertion to that person without deciding anything, so it never changes the approval state. Pass an entry's \`id\` to edit an existing assertion, or omit it to add a new one, so two callers adding different assertions to one trace never overwrite each other. What this tool writes is saved awaiting review, so nothing checks it yet; a reviewer approves it, in Bitfab or with \`approvalState\` on a later call here, and from then on every replay of the trace is judged against it. \`approvalState\` decides an assertion that already exists, so deciding one is \`{ id, approvalState }\` with nothing else: an omitted \`assertion\` keeps the current wording. It is refused on a new assertion, so the call that invents a claim is never the call that puts it into force. One decision covers the assertion and the category it is filed under, so set \`category_id\` and \`approvalState\` in the same entry when you are deciding both; recategorizing on a later call without deciding returns it to not reviewed, since the approval covered the old category. What it gates is whether replays check the assertion at all, so decide from the assertion and the spans it cites rather than from memory of having written it. Rewording an assertion, or changing its criteria, target, or category, returns it to not reviewed unless the same call says otherwise. Call get_trace_assertions first to find the assertion to edit and to avoid creating a duplicate, and read them back before judging a replay, where it lists the approved ones by default. Pass it \`approvalStates: ["pending"]\` to read back drafts awaiting review, including the ones you just wrote. Each assertion with new text is checked against the trace and rewritten when it breaks the writing rules, unless \`guidedRewrite\` is false, so read the response for what was saved and for any claim to save separately. Up to ${MAX_ASSERTIONS_PER_REQUEST} per call.`,
   inputSchema: {
     traceId: external_exports.uuid().describe("The ORIGINAL trace to attach assertions to. A replay trace id is refused, and the error names the original to retry with, because a replay reads its original's assertions automatically."),
     assertions: external_exports.preprocess(parseJsonString, external_exports.array(external_exports.object({
@@ -29271,7 +29271,8 @@ var saveTraceAssertions = {
       categoryJustification: justificationShape.nullish().describe("Why `category_id` is the right category for this assertion, cited span by span. Omit on an edit to preserve it, or pass null to remove it. Changing the category clears it, since it justified the old one. Cite spans on this trace only."),
       approvalState: optionalApprovalState(),
       assigneeEmail: external_exports.email().max(MAX_ASSIGNEE_EMAIL_LENGTH).nullish().describe("Email of the organization member who should review this assertion, which routes it into their queue in Bitfab. Assigning decides nothing, so it leaves the approval state alone. The email must belong to a member of this organization, or the call fails naming it. Omit on an edit to preserve the current assignee, and pass null to leave it to nobody.")
-    })).min(1).max(MAX_ASSERTIONS_PER_REQUEST)).describe(`One entry per assertion (1-${MAX_ASSERTIONS_PER_REQUEST})`)
+    })).min(1).max(MAX_ASSERTIONS_PER_REQUEST)).describe(`One entry per assertion (1-${MAX_ASSERTIONS_PER_REQUEST})`),
+    guidedRewrite: external_exports.boolean().optional().describe("Check each assertion that carries new text against this trace, and rewrite one that breaks the writing rules (two claims in one, a condition, a value pointed at instead of stated, an id from the recorded run, a word with no clear pass line). Defaults to true. The check runs on Bitfab right after the save, and this call waits up to four minutes for it, usually under one. A rewritten assertion replaces what you sent, and the response shows what you sent and what changed. One still being checked when the wait ends is listed as such and may be rewritten in place shortly after. get_trace_assertions shows the result once the check finishes, so read it back there before relying on its wording. When what you sent bundled more than one claim, the response gives each other claim as ready-to-send text: save those as their own assertions. Pass false only to save text exactly as sent, for example wording a person dictated.")
   }
 };
 var getTraceAssertions = {
@@ -30393,10 +30394,10 @@ var semver3 = __toESM(require_semver2(), 1);
 
 // ../bitfab-plugin-lib/dist/bakedSdkVersions.js
 var BAKED_SDK_VERSIONS = {
-  typescript: "0.65.8",
-  python: "0.65.5",
-  ruby: "0.65.5",
-  go: "0.65.5"
+  typescript: "0.65.10",
+  python: "0.65.7",
+  ruby: "0.65.7",
+  go: "0.65.7"
 };
 
 // ../bitfab-plugin-lib/dist/installedSdk.js

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "bitfab-cli",
-  "version": "0.2.466",
+  "version": "0.2.468",
   "description": "Install and configure the Bitfab plugin in Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor, or the Bitfab skill pack in Amp (Alpha).",
   "type": "module",
   "main": "dist/index.js",