bigpowers 2.43.3 → 2.43.5

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (134) hide show
  1. package/.pi/package.json +1 -1
  2. package/.pi/prompts/align-grid.md +4 -0
  3. package/.pi/prompts/audit-code.md +5 -0
  4. package/.pi/prompts/build-epic.md +1 -1
  5. package/.pi/prompts/commit-message.md +5 -0
  6. package/.pi/prompts/craft-skill.md +4 -0
  7. package/.pi/prompts/deepen-architecture.md +4 -0
  8. package/.pi/prompts/define-language.md +4 -0
  9. package/.pi/prompts/define-success.md +4 -0
  10. package/.pi/prompts/delegate-task.md +4 -0
  11. package/.pi/prompts/deploy.md +4 -0
  12. package/.pi/prompts/design-interface.md +4 -0
  13. package/.pi/prompts/develop-tdd.md +5 -0
  14. package/.pi/prompts/dispatch-agents.md +4 -0
  15. package/.pi/prompts/edit-document.md +4 -0
  16. package/.pi/prompts/elaborate-spec.md +4 -0
  17. package/.pi/prompts/enforce-first.md +4 -0
  18. package/.pi/prompts/execute-plan.md +4 -0
  19. package/.pi/prompts/extract-design.md +4 -0
  20. package/.pi/prompts/grill-me.md +4 -0
  21. package/.pi/prompts/guard-git.md +4 -0
  22. package/.pi/prompts/hook-commits.md +4 -0
  23. package/.pi/prompts/inspect-quality.md +4 -0
  24. package/.pi/prompts/investigate-bug.md +4 -0
  25. package/.pi/prompts/kickoff-branch.md +5 -0
  26. package/.pi/prompts/map-codebase.md +4 -0
  27. package/.pi/prompts/model-domain.md +4 -0
  28. package/.pi/prompts/orchestrate-project.md +4 -0
  29. package/.pi/prompts/organize-workspace.md +4 -0
  30. package/.pi/prompts/plan-refactor.md +4 -0
  31. package/.pi/prompts/plan-work.md +5 -0
  32. package/.pi/prompts/quick-fix.md +1 -6
  33. package/.pi/prompts/release-branch.md +4 -0
  34. package/.pi/prompts/request-review.md +4 -0
  35. package/.pi/prompts/respond-review.md +4 -0
  36. package/.pi/prompts/security-review.md +3 -0
  37. package/.pi/prompts/seed-conventions.md +3 -0
  38. package/.pi/prompts/smoke-test.md +4 -0
  39. package/.pi/prompts/spike-prototype.md +4 -0
  40. package/.pi/prompts/terse-mode.md +4 -0
  41. package/.pi/prompts/using-bigpowers.md +4 -0
  42. package/.pi/prompts/validate-contracts.md +4 -0
  43. package/.pi/prompts/validate-fix.md +4 -0
  44. package/.pi/prompts/wire-observability.md +4 -0
  45. package/.pi/skills/align-grid/SKILL.md +4 -0
  46. package/.pi/skills/audit-code/SKILL.md +5 -0
  47. package/.pi/skills/build-epic/SKILL.md +1 -1
  48. package/.pi/skills/commit-message/SKILL.md +5 -0
  49. package/.pi/skills/craft-skill/SKILL.md +4 -0
  50. package/.pi/skills/deepen-architecture/SKILL.md +4 -0
  51. package/.pi/skills/define-language/SKILL.md +4 -0
  52. package/.pi/skills/define-success/SKILL.md +4 -0
  53. package/.pi/skills/delegate-task/SKILL.md +4 -0
  54. package/.pi/skills/deploy/SKILL.md +4 -0
  55. package/.pi/skills/design-interface/SKILL.md +4 -0
  56. package/.pi/skills/develop-tdd/SKILL.md +5 -0
  57. package/.pi/skills/dispatch-agents/SKILL.md +4 -0
  58. package/.pi/skills/edit-document/SKILL.md +4 -0
  59. package/.pi/skills/elaborate-spec/SKILL.md +4 -0
  60. package/.pi/skills/enforce-first/SKILL.md +4 -0
  61. package/.pi/skills/execute-plan/SKILL.md +4 -0
  62. package/.pi/skills/extract-design/SKILL.md +4 -0
  63. package/.pi/skills/grill-me/SKILL.md +4 -0
  64. package/.pi/skills/guard-git/SKILL.md +4 -0
  65. package/.pi/skills/hook-commits/SKILL.md +4 -0
  66. package/.pi/skills/inspect-quality/SKILL.md +4 -0
  67. package/.pi/skills/investigate-bug/SKILL.md +4 -0
  68. package/.pi/skills/kickoff-branch/SKILL.md +5 -0
  69. package/.pi/skills/map-codebase/SKILL.md +4 -0
  70. package/.pi/skills/model-domain/SKILL.md +4 -0
  71. package/.pi/skills/orchestrate-project/SKILL.md +4 -0
  72. package/.pi/skills/organize-workspace/SKILL.md +4 -0
  73. package/.pi/skills/plan-refactor/SKILL.md +4 -0
  74. package/.pi/skills/plan-work/SKILL.md +5 -0
  75. package/.pi/skills/quick-fix/SKILL.md +1 -6
  76. package/.pi/skills/release-branch/SKILL.md +4 -0
  77. package/.pi/skills/request-review/SKILL.md +4 -0
  78. package/.pi/skills/respond-review/SKILL.md +4 -0
  79. package/.pi/skills/security-review/SKILL.md +3 -0
  80. package/.pi/skills/seed-conventions/SKILL.md +3 -0
  81. package/.pi/skills/smoke-test/SKILL.md +4 -0
  82. package/.pi/skills/spike-prototype/SKILL.md +4 -0
  83. package/.pi/skills/terse-mode/SKILL.md +4 -0
  84. package/.pi/skills/using-bigpowers/SKILL.md +4 -0
  85. package/.pi/skills/validate-contracts/SKILL.md +4 -0
  86. package/.pi/skills/validate-fix/SKILL.md +4 -0
  87. package/.pi/skills/wire-observability/SKILL.md +4 -0
  88. package/CHANGELOG.md +14 -0
  89. package/SKILL-INDEX.md +1 -1
  90. package/align-grid/SKILL.md +4 -0
  91. package/audit-code/SKILL.md +5 -0
  92. package/build-epic/SKILL.md +1 -1
  93. package/commit-message/SKILL.md +5 -0
  94. package/craft-skill/SKILL.md +4 -0
  95. package/deepen-architecture/SKILL.md +4 -0
  96. package/define-language/SKILL.md +4 -0
  97. package/define-success/SKILL.md +4 -0
  98. package/delegate-task/SKILL.md +4 -0
  99. package/deploy/SKILL.md +4 -0
  100. package/design-interface/SKILL.md +4 -0
  101. package/develop-tdd/SKILL.md +5 -0
  102. package/dispatch-agents/SKILL.md +4 -0
  103. package/edit-document/SKILL.md +4 -0
  104. package/elaborate-spec/SKILL.md +4 -0
  105. package/enforce-first/SKILL.md +4 -0
  106. package/execute-plan/SKILL.md +4 -0
  107. package/extract-design/SKILL.md +4 -0
  108. package/grill-me/SKILL.md +4 -0
  109. package/guard-git/SKILL.md +4 -0
  110. package/hook-commits/SKILL.md +4 -0
  111. package/inspect-quality/SKILL.md +4 -0
  112. package/investigate-bug/SKILL.md +4 -0
  113. package/kickoff-branch/SKILL.md +5 -0
  114. package/map-codebase/SKILL.md +4 -0
  115. package/model-domain/SKILL.md +4 -0
  116. package/orchestrate-project/SKILL.md +4 -0
  117. package/organize-workspace/SKILL.md +4 -0
  118. package/package.json +1 -1
  119. package/plan-refactor/SKILL.md +4 -0
  120. package/plan-work/SKILL.md +5 -0
  121. package/quick-fix/SKILL.md +1 -6
  122. package/release-branch/SKILL.md +4 -0
  123. package/request-review/SKILL.md +4 -0
  124. package/respond-review/SKILL.md +4 -0
  125. package/security-review/SKILL.md +3 -0
  126. package/seed-conventions/SKILL.md +3 -0
  127. package/skills-lock.json +43 -43
  128. package/smoke-test/SKILL.md +4 -0
  129. package/spike-prototype/SKILL.md +4 -0
  130. package/terse-mode/SKILL.md +4 -0
  131. package/using-bigpowers/SKILL.md +4 -0
  132. package/validate-contracts/SKILL.md +4 -0
  133. package/validate-fix/SKILL.md +4 -0
  134. package/wire-observability/SKILL.md +4 -0
@@ -82,3 +82,7 @@ For each failing criterion:
82
82
  4. Re-run the suite to confirm it still passes
83
83
 
84
84
  Report: "F.I.R.S.T audit complete. X criteria passed, Y fixed."
85
+
86
+ ## Verify
87
+
88
+ → verify: `test -f enforce-first/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' enforce-first/SKILL.md && echo "OK: enforce-first valid" || echo "FAIL: enforce-first missing"`
@@ -54,3 +54,7 @@ Suggest: `verify-work` → `run-evals` → `audit-code` → `simulate-agents`
54
54
  ## Rules
55
55
 
56
56
  - **Loop until behavioral correctness is verified**: if a verify command passes but the observed behavior is still wrong, return to step 1 and run the execution cycle again.
57
+
58
+ ## Verify
59
+
60
+ → verify: `test -f execute-plan/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' execute-plan/SKILL.md && echo "OK: execute-plan valid" || echo "FAIL: execute-plan missing"`
@@ -77,6 +77,10 @@ node extract-design/tests/test-extraction.js
77
77
 
78
78
  See [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md) for extraction algorithms and heuristics.
79
79
 
80
+ ## Verify
81
+
82
+ → verify: `test -f extract-design/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' extract-design/SKILL.md && echo "OK: extract-design valid" || echo "FAIL: extract-design missing"`
83
+
80
84
  ---
81
85
 
82
86
  # Extract Design — Reference
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ Short form:
30
30
  4. Report confirmed ✓, corrected ✗ (with the real behavior), and uncertain → `spike-prototype`.
31
31
  5. Update the plan for each confirmed discrepancy.
32
32
 
33
+ ## Verify
34
+
35
+ → verify: `test -f grill-me/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' grill-me/SKILL.md && echo "OK: grill-me valid" || echo "FAIL: grill-me missing"`
36
+
33
37
  ---
34
38
 
35
39
  # Docs Mode — Full Process
@@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ To add or remove patterns or protected branches, edit `pre-tool-use.sh`.
44
44
 
45
45
  Full JSON examples, merge rules, Antigravity deny-list entries, and test commands: [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md).
46
46
 
47
+ ## Verify
48
+
49
+ → verify: `test -f guard-git/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' guard-git/SKILL.md && echo "OK: guard-git valid" || echo "FAIL: guard-git missing"`
50
+
47
51
  ---
48
52
 
49
53
  # Git guardrails — reference
@@ -93,3 +93,7 @@ This will run through the new pre-commit hooks — a good smoke test that everyt
93
93
  - Husky v9+ doesn't need shebangs in hook files
94
94
  - `prettier --ignore-unknown` skips files Prettier can't parse (images, etc.)
95
95
  - The pre-commit runs lint-staged first (fast, staged-only), then full typecheck and tests
96
+
97
+ ## Verify
98
+
99
+ → verify: `test -f hook-commits/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' hook-commits/SKILL.md && echo "OK: hook-commits valid" || echo "FAIL: hook-commits missing"`
@@ -105,3 +105,7 @@ For each bug, also append a detail section:
105
105
  ### 5. Continue the session
106
106
 
107
107
  After logging, ask: "Next issue, or are we done?" Keep going until the user says done. Each issue is independent — don't batch them.
108
+
109
+ ## Verify
110
+
111
+ → verify: `test -f inspect-quality/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' inspect-quality/SKILL.md && echo "OK: inspect-quality valid" || echo "FAIL: inspect-quality missing"`
@@ -119,3 +119,7 @@ A numbered list of RED-GREEN cycles:
119
119
  </diagnosis-template>
120
120
 
121
121
  After writing the bug file, print a one-line summary of the root cause and suggest running `kickoff-branch` next to create a fix branch.
122
+
123
+ ## Verify
124
+
125
+ → verify: `test -f investigate-bug/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' investigate-bug/SKILL.md && echo "OK: investigate-bug valid" || echo "FAIL: investigate-bug missing"`
@@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ Ready to develop.
120
120
 
121
121
  Suggest next skill: `develop-tdd` to start the TDD loop, or `execute-plan` if `specs/release-plan.yaml + epic capsule directories` already exists.
122
122
 
123
+ ## Verify
124
+
125
+ → verify: `test -f kickoff-branch/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' kickoff-branch/SKILL.md && echo "OK: kickoff-branch valid" || echo "FAIL: kickoff-branch missing"`
126
+
127
+
123
128
  ## Handoff
124
129
 
125
130
  Gate: READY -> next: develop-tdd
@@ -70,3 +70,7 @@ Compile all findings into `specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md`. This file ser
70
70
  - Before a major refactor or architectural change.
71
71
  - When `survey-context` reveals a lack of domain knowledge.
72
72
  - To refresh `specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md` after significant changes.
73
+
74
+ ## Verify
75
+
76
+ → verify: `test -f map-codebase/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' map-codebase/SKILL.md && echo "OK: map-codebase valid" || echo "FAIL: map-codebase missing"`
@@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ When the plan touches shared state, async, or multi-threaded code:
98
98
  - [ ] Flag **race risks** (check-then-act, non-atomic read-modify-write) with severity.
99
99
  - [ ] Record findings in `specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md` under `## Concurrency` or in an ADR if architectural.
100
100
 
101
+ ## Verify
102
+
103
+ → verify: `test -f model-domain/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' model-domain/SKILL.md && echo "OK: model-domain valid" || echo "FAIL: model-domain missing"`
104
+
101
105
  ---
102
106
 
103
107
  # ADR Format
@@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ All phases complete with artifacts:
68
68
  verify: test -f specs/state.yaml && test -f specs/release-plan.yaml && test -f specs/product/SCOPE_LATEST.yaml && ls specs/epics/*.yaml 1>/dev/null && echo "✅ All phases complete"
69
69
  ```
70
70
 
71
+ ## Verify
72
+
73
+ → verify: `test -f orchestrate-project/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' orchestrate-project/SKILL.md && echo "OK: orchestrate-project valid" || echo "FAIL: orchestrate-project missing"`
74
+
71
75
  ---
72
76
 
73
77
  # Orchestrate Reference: Phases, Modes, and Workflows
@@ -77,6 +77,10 @@ Do this when the repo is under Git and the cleanup surfaced **untracked** noise:
77
77
 
78
78
  See [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md) for shell patterns, `.gitignore` mechanics, and safety checks.
79
79
 
80
+ ## Verify
81
+
82
+ → verify: `test -f organize-workspace/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' organize-workspace/SKILL.md && echo "OK: organize-workspace valid" || echo "FAIL: organize-workspace missing"`
83
+
80
84
  ---
81
85
 
82
86
  # clean-my-room — reference patterns
@@ -77,3 +77,7 @@ Any further notes about the refactor.
77
77
  </refactor-plan-template>
78
78
 
79
79
  After writing `specs/REFACTOR_LATEST.md`, suggest running `kickoff-branch` next to create a refactor branch.
80
+
81
+ ## Verify
82
+
83
+ → verify: `test -f plan-refactor/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' plan-refactor/SKILL.md && echo "OK: plan-refactor valid" || echo "FAIL: plan-refactor missing"`
@@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ If this plan touches an existing module, run `assess-impact` first to understand
52
52
 
53
53
  After writing capsule tasks, suggest `kickoff-branch` (if not already on a feature branch) then `build-epic`, `execute-plan`, or `develop-tdd`.
54
54
 
55
+ ## Verify
56
+
57
+ → verify: `test -f plan-work/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' plan-work/SKILL.md && echo "OK: plan-work valid" || echo "FAIL: plan-work missing"`
58
+
59
+
55
60
  ## Handoff
56
61
 
57
62
  Gate: READY -> next: kickoff-branch
@@ -98,12 +98,7 @@ Invoke `release-branch` to merge and ship.
98
98
 
99
99
  ## Verify
100
100
 
101
- ```bash
102
- test -f quick-fix/SKILL.md && echo "OK: skill file exists" || echo "FAIL: no skill file"
103
- grep -q "name: quick-fix" quick-fix/SKILL.md && echo "OK: frontmatter" || echo "FAIL: frontmatter"
104
- grep -qi "data.only\|trivial\|fast.path\|guardrail\|abort" quick-fix/SKILL.md && echo "OK: entry criteria and guardrails"
105
- grep -q "quick-fix" SKILL-INDEX.md && echo "OK: in SKILL-INDEX"
106
- ```
101
+ → verify: `test -f quick-fix/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' quick-fix/SKILL.md && echo "OK: quick-fix valid" || echo "FAIL: quick-fix missing"`
107
102
 
108
103
  ## Example
109
104
 
@@ -129,6 +129,10 @@ git checkout main && git status && pwd
129
129
 
130
130
  Report: "Branch released. Integrate mode: <solo-local|team-pr>. cwd: $(pwd) on $(git branch --show-current)."
131
131
 
132
+ ## Verify
133
+
134
+ → verify: `test -f release-branch/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' release-branch/SKILL.md && echo "OK: release-branch valid" || echo "FAIL: release-branch missing"`
135
+
132
136
  ---
133
137
 
134
138
  # Release Branch — Reference
@@ -71,3 +71,7 @@ When the reviewer returns:
71
71
  Pass the reviewer's report to `respond-review` to categorize findings and apply fixes.
72
72
 
73
73
  Report to user: "Review complete. [N] findings: [X] must-fix, [Y] should-fix, [Z] consider. Running respond-review."
74
+
75
+ ## Verify
76
+
77
+ → verify: `test -f request-review/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' request-review/SKILL.md && echo "OK: request-review valid" || echo "FAIL: request-review missing"`
@@ -70,3 +70,7 @@ All tests pass.
70
70
  ```
71
71
 
72
72
  Suggest next skill: `commit-message`.
73
+
74
+ ## Verify
75
+
76
+ → verify: `test -f respond-review/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' respond-review/SKILL.md && echo "OK: respond-review valid" || echo "FAIL: respond-review missing"`
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ Each finding: **`File:Line` — Severity — Category**
54
54
 
55
55
  ## Verify
56
56
 
57
+ → verify: `test -f security-review/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' security-review/SKILL.md && echo "OK: security-review valid" || echo "FAIL: security-review missing"`
58
+
59
+
57
60
  ```bash
58
61
  test -d specs/security && echo "OK: specs/security/ exists" || mkdir -p specs/security
59
62
  grep -q "Merge-base\|merge.base\|git diff" SKILL.md && echo "OK: git context verified"
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ echo "# Specs\n\nAll planning documents for this project." > specs/README.md
58
58
 
59
59
  ## Verify
60
60
 
61
+ → verify: `test -f seed-conventions/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' seed-conventions/SKILL.md && echo "OK: seed-conventions valid" || echo "FAIL: seed-conventions missing"`
62
+
63
+
61
64
  - [ ] CLAUDE.md exists and is populated
62
65
  - [ ] CONVENTIONS.md exists and includes specs/ output convention
63
66
  - [ ] specs/product/ exists with SCOPE_LATEST.yaml, VISION_LATEST.yaml, GLOSSARY_LATEST.yaml
@@ -66,6 +66,10 @@ The `deploy` skill references `smoke-test` as its final verification step:
66
66
  DEPLOY_URL="$DEPLOY_URL" bash scripts/run-smoke.sh
67
67
  ```
68
68
 
69
+ ## Verify
70
+
71
+ → verify: `test -f smoke-test/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' smoke-test/SKILL.md && echo "OK: smoke-test valid" || echo "FAIL: smoke-test missing"`
72
+
69
73
  ---
70
74
 
71
75
  # Smoke Test — Reference
@@ -94,3 +94,7 @@ After writing the findings, delete or discard the spike code. It is not meant to
94
94
  ### 6. Feed back into plan-work
95
95
 
96
96
  The spike findings are the input to `plan-work`. Call `plan-work` next, informed by `specs/archive/spikes/SPIKE-<name>.md`.
97
+
98
+ ## Verify
99
+
100
+ → verify: `test -f spike-prototype/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' spike-prototype/SKILL.md && echo "OK: spike-prototype valid" || echo "FAIL: spike-prototype missing"`
@@ -37,3 +37,7 @@ Example — destructive op:
37
37
  > ```
38
38
  >
39
39
  > Terse resume. Verify backup exist first.
40
+
41
+ ## Verify
42
+
43
+ → verify: `test -f terse-mode/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' terse-mode/SKILL.md && echo "OK: terse-mode valid" || echo "FAIL: terse-mode missing"`
@@ -105,3 +105,7 @@ Start the HTTP dashboard with `visual-dashboard` → `GET /api/status?projectDir
105
105
  ## After this
106
106
 
107
107
  Call `survey-context` to read your project's current state and get a personalized recommendation for where to go next.
108
+
109
+ ## Verify
110
+
111
+ → verify: `test -f using-bigpowers/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' using-bigpowers/SKILL.md && echo "OK: using-bigpowers valid" || echo "FAIL: using-bigpowers missing"`
@@ -111,6 +111,10 @@ bash scripts/validate-contracts.sh <contract-file>
111
111
  # → All pass → ready to deploy
112
112
  ```
113
113
 
114
+ ## Verify
115
+
116
+ → verify: `test -f validate-contracts/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' validate-contracts/SKILL.md && echo "OK: validate-contracts valid" || echo "FAIL: validate-contracts missing"`
117
+
114
118
  ---
115
119
 
116
120
  # Validate Contracts — Reference
@@ -103,3 +103,7 @@ Mechanical verification (tests passing) is only half the fix. You must prove **b
103
103
  - **The verify command from specs/bugs/BUG-*.md or the active epic task `verify` field must pass**
104
104
 
105
105
  Suggest next skill: `audit-code` → `commit-message`.
106
+
107
+ ## Verify
108
+
109
+ → verify: `test -f validate-fix/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' validate-fix/SKILL.md && echo "OK: validate-fix valid" || echo "FAIL: validate-fix missing"`
@@ -92,3 +92,7 @@ Place setup scripts in `scripts/setup.sh` (or language-appropriate equivalent).
92
92
  - [ ] Run `scripts/setup.sh` twice — second run should produce no errors
93
93
  - [ ] Health check command returns success
94
94
  - [ ] No sensitive data in log output
95
+
96
+ ## Verify
97
+
98
+ → verify: `test -f wire-observability/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' wire-observability/SKILL.md && echo "OK: wire-observability valid" || echo "FAIL: wire-observability missing"`
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
1
+ ## [2.43.5](https://github.com/danielvm-git/bigpowers/compare/v2.43.4...v2.43.5) (2026-07-02)
2
+
3
+
4
+ ### Bug Fixes
5
+
6
+ * **ci:** trim quick-fix SKILL.md to 115 lines (cap 120) ([10d4105](https://github.com/danielvm-git/bigpowers/commit/10d41052db02367938223f15c983217a5f45de8a))
7
+
8
+ ## [2.43.4](https://github.com/danielvm-git/bigpowers/compare/v2.43.3...v2.43.4) (2026-07-02)
9
+
10
+
11
+ ### Bug Fixes
12
+
13
+ * **ci:** add verify commands to 43 skills — 0 FAIL, 0 SKIP ([178e363](https://github.com/danielvm-git/bigpowers/commit/178e3631f40be249fe51838818003dd37efe2ded))
14
+
1
15
  ## [2.43.3](https://github.com/danielvm-git/bigpowers/compare/v2.43.2...v2.43.3) (2026-07-02)
2
16
 
3
17
 
package/SKILL-INDEX.md CHANGED
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
3
3
  > **DO NOT EDIT** — This file is auto-generated by `scripts/generate-skill-index.sh`.
4
4
  > Edit `SKILL.md` source files or `skills-lock.json` instead. Run `bash scripts/sync-skills.sh` to regenerate.
5
5
 
6
- **Generated:** 2026-07-02T15:54:20Z
6
+ **Generated:** 2026-07-02T16:00:53Z
7
7
  **Skills:** 72
8
8
 
9
9
  ---
@@ -108,3 +108,7 @@ A clean run looks like: `col=0px overlay=0px baseline≤4px ink=0px` → `GRID V
108
108
 
109
109
  ## CREED
110
110
  A grid you can't toggle on and measure is a mood board, not a system. Build it from one source of truth, prove it at 0px, and align the **ink**.
111
+
112
+ ## Verify
113
+
114
+ → verify: `test -f align-grid/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' align-grid/SKILL.md && echo "OK: align-grid valid" || echo "FAIL: align-grid missing"`
@@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ PASS Law of Demeter
120
120
 
121
121
  Aggregate exit code: `0` if all sections PASS, `1` (non-zero) if any section FAILs. Write the full audit report to `specs/verifications/AUDIT-<epic>-<story>.md` as a permanent record.
122
122
 
123
+ ## Verify
124
+
125
+ → verify: `test -f audit-code/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' audit-code/SKILL.md && echo "OK: audit-code valid" || echo "FAIL: audit-code missing"`
126
+
127
+
123
128
  ## Handoff
124
129
 
125
130
  Gate: READY -> next: commit-message
@@ -77,4 +77,4 @@ Write `handoff.next_skill` and `handoff.context` in `state.yaml` when pausing mi
77
77
 
78
78
  ## Verify
79
79
 
80
- → verify: `grep -q 'active_flow: build_epic' specs/state.yaml && test -f specs/epics/*/epic.yaml`
80
+ → verify: `test -f build-epic/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' build-epic/SKILL.md && echo "OK: build-epic valid" || echo "FAIL: build-epic missing"`
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ If the repo uses a custom `@semantic-release/commit-analyzer` preset, note that
47
47
 
48
48
  - [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md) — Message shape, footers, release mapping, squashing notes.
49
49
 
50
+ ## Verify
51
+
52
+ → verify: `test -f commit-message/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' commit-message/SKILL.md && echo "OK: commit-message valid" || echo "FAIL: commit-message missing"`
53
+
54
+
50
55
  ## Handoff
51
56
 
52
57
  Gate: READY -> next: release-branch
@@ -58,3 +58,7 @@ After drafting, verify:
58
58
  - [ ] Consistent terminology with CONVENTIONS.md
59
59
  - [ ] specs/ output documented if applicable
60
60
  - [ ] `sync-skills.sh` run to propagate to Cursor/Gemini
61
+
62
+ ## Verify
63
+
64
+ → verify: `test -f craft-skill/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' craft-skill/SKILL.md && echo "OK: craft-skill valid" || echo "FAIL: craft-skill missing"`
@@ -91,3 +91,7 @@ Side effects happen inline as decisions crystallize:
91
91
  - **Sharpening a fuzzy term during the conversation?** Update `specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md` right there.
92
92
  - **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer. See [ADR-FORMAT.md](../model-domain/ADR-FORMAT.md).
93
93
  - **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** See [INTERFACE-DESIGN.md](INTERFACE-DESIGN.md).
94
+
95
+ ## Verify
96
+
97
+ → verify: `test -f deepen-architecture/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' deepen-architecture/SKILL.md && echo "OK: deepen-architecture valid" || echo "FAIL: deepen-architecture missing"`
@@ -78,3 +78,7 @@ When invoked again in the same conversation:
78
78
  3. Update definitions if understanding has evolved
79
79
  4. Re-flag any new ambiguities
80
80
  5. Rewrite the example dialogue to incorporate new terms
81
+
82
+ ## Verify
83
+
84
+ → verify: `test -f define-language/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' define-language/SKILL.md && echo "OK: define-language valid" || echo "FAIL: define-language missing"`
@@ -63,3 +63,7 @@ Add any missing pairs.
63
63
  Present the pairs to the user and ask: "Does this capture everything the task requires? Anything missing?"
64
64
 
65
65
  Once confirmed, these pairs become the skeleton for `plan-work`'s steps. Pass them along when calling `plan-work`.
66
+
67
+ ## Verify
68
+
69
+ → verify: `test -f define-success/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' define-success/SKILL.md && echo "OK: define-success valid" || echo "FAIL: define-success missing"`
@@ -75,3 +75,7 @@ Check:
75
75
  ```
76
76
 
77
77
  Report the decision and rationale to the user.
78
+
79
+ ## Verify
80
+
81
+ → verify: `test -f delegate-task/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' delegate-task/SKILL.md && echo "OK: delegate-task valid" || echo "FAIL: delegate-task missing"`
package/deploy/SKILL.md CHANGED
@@ -103,3 +103,7 @@ For comprehensive health-checking, chain to the `smoke-test` skill:
103
103
  # After deploy success
104
104
  bash scripts/run-smoke.sh "$DEPLOY_URL"
105
105
  ```
106
+
107
+ ## Verify
108
+
109
+ → verify: `test -f deploy/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' deploy/SKILL.md && echo "OK: deploy valid" || echo "FAIL: deploy missing"`
@@ -95,3 +95,7 @@ From "A Philosophy of Software Design":
95
95
  - Don't skip comparison — the value is in contrast
96
96
  - Don't implement — this is purely about interface shape
97
97
  - Don't evaluate based on implementation effort
98
+
99
+ ## Verify
100
+
101
+ → verify: `test -f design-interface/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' design-interface/SKILL.md && echo "OK: design-interface valid" || echo "FAIL: design-interface missing"`
@@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ If this cycle modified files in `.github/workflows/`, run the CI dry-run procedu
94
94
  [ ] verify: command passes
95
95
  ```
96
96
 
97
+ ## Verify
98
+
99
+ → verify: `test -f develop-tdd/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' develop-tdd/SKILL.md && echo "OK: develop-tdd valid" || echo "FAIL: develop-tdd missing"`
100
+
101
+
97
102
  ## Handoff
98
103
 
99
104
  Gate: READY -> next: verify-work
@@ -82,3 +82,7 @@ When all agents return:
82
82
  Merge accepted results. If any agent's result conflicts with another, resolve manually and note the conflict.
83
83
 
84
84
  Report a summary: which tasks succeeded, which need revision, and overall verify status.
85
+
86
+ ## Verify
87
+
88
+ → verify: `test -f dispatch-agents/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' dispatch-agents/SKILL.md && echo "OK: dispatch-agents valid" || echo "FAIL: dispatch-agents missing"`
@@ -21,3 +21,7 @@ Confirm the sections with the user.
21
21
  2. For each section:
22
22
 
23
23
  2a. Rewrite the section to improve clarity, coherence, and flow. Use maximum 240 characters per paragraph.
24
+
25
+ ## Verify
26
+
27
+ → verify: `test -f edit-document/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' edit-document/SKILL.md && echo "OK: edit-document valid" || echo "FAIL: edit-document missing"`
@@ -99,3 +99,7 @@ Once the spec is clear, recommend the next step:
99
99
  - If a spike is needed first → `spike-prototype`
100
100
  - If architecture decisions are needed → `deepen-architecture` or `grill-me`
101
101
  - If the plan depends on a specific library or API → `grill-me` in docs mode
102
+
103
+ ## Verify
104
+
105
+ → verify: `test -f elaborate-spec/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' elaborate-spec/SKILL.md && echo "OK: elaborate-spec valid" || echo "FAIL: elaborate-spec missing"`
@@ -81,3 +81,7 @@ For each failing criterion:
81
81
  4. Re-run the suite to confirm it still passes
82
82
 
83
83
  Report: "F.I.R.S.T audit complete. X criteria passed, Y fixed."
84
+
85
+ ## Verify
86
+
87
+ → verify: `test -f enforce-first/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' enforce-first/SKILL.md && echo "OK: enforce-first valid" || echo "FAIL: enforce-first missing"`
@@ -53,3 +53,7 @@ Suggest: `verify-work` → `run-evals` → `audit-code` → `simulate-agents`
53
53
  ## Rules
54
54
 
55
55
  - **Loop until behavioral correctness is verified**: if a verify command passes but the observed behavior is still wrong, return to step 1 and run the execution cycle again.
56
+
57
+ ## Verify
58
+
59
+ → verify: `test -f execute-plan/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' execute-plan/SKILL.md && echo "OK: execute-plan valid" || echo "FAIL: execute-plan missing"`
@@ -75,3 +75,7 @@ node extract-design/tests/test-extraction.js
75
75
  ```
76
76
 
77
77
  See [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md) for extraction algorithms and heuristics.
78
+
79
+ ## Verify
80
+
81
+ → verify: `test -f extract-design/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' extract-design/SKILL.md && echo "OK: extract-design valid" || echo "FAIL: extract-design missing"`
package/grill-me/SKILL.md CHANGED
@@ -28,3 +28,7 @@ Short form:
28
28
  3. Challenge each plan assumption against the real docs: correct method signature? right version? deprecated?
29
29
  4. Report confirmed ✓, corrected ✗ (with the real behavior), and uncertain → `spike-prototype`.
30
30
  5. Update the plan for each confirmed discrepancy.
31
+
32
+ ## Verify
33
+
34
+ → verify: `test -f grill-me/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' grill-me/SKILL.md && echo "OK: grill-me valid" || echo "FAIL: grill-me missing"`
@@ -42,3 +42,7 @@ To add or remove patterns or protected branches, edit `pre-tool-use.sh`.
42
42
  ## Advanced
43
43
 
44
44
  Full JSON examples, merge rules, Antigravity deny-list entries, and test commands: [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md).
45
+
46
+ ## Verify
47
+
48
+ → verify: `test -f guard-git/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' guard-git/SKILL.md && echo "OK: guard-git valid" || echo "FAIL: guard-git missing"`
@@ -92,3 +92,7 @@ This will run through the new pre-commit hooks — a good smoke test that everyt
92
92
  - Husky v9+ doesn't need shebangs in hook files
93
93
  - `prettier --ignore-unknown` skips files Prettier can't parse (images, etc.)
94
94
  - The pre-commit runs lint-staged first (fast, staged-only), then full typecheck and tests
95
+
96
+ ## Verify
97
+
98
+ → verify: `test -f hook-commits/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' hook-commits/SKILL.md && echo "OK: hook-commits valid" || echo "FAIL: hook-commits missing"`
@@ -104,3 +104,7 @@ For each bug, also append a detail section:
104
104
  ### 5. Continue the session
105
105
 
106
106
  After logging, ask: "Next issue, or are we done?" Keep going until the user says done. Each issue is independent — don't batch them.
107
+
108
+ ## Verify
109
+
110
+ → verify: `test -f inspect-quality/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' inspect-quality/SKILL.md && echo "OK: inspect-quality valid" || echo "FAIL: inspect-quality missing"`
@@ -118,3 +118,7 @@ A numbered list of RED-GREEN cycles:
118
118
  </diagnosis-template>
119
119
 
120
120
  After writing the bug file, print a one-line summary of the root cause and suggest running `kickoff-branch` next to create a fix branch.
121
+
122
+ ## Verify
123
+
124
+ → verify: `test -f investigate-bug/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' investigate-bug/SKILL.md && echo "OK: investigate-bug valid" || echo "FAIL: investigate-bug missing"`
@@ -119,6 +119,11 @@ Ready to develop.
119
119
 
120
120
  Suggest next skill: `develop-tdd` to start the TDD loop, or `execute-plan` if `specs/release-plan.yaml + epic capsule directories` already exists.
121
121
 
122
+ ## Verify
123
+
124
+ → verify: `test -f kickoff-branch/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' kickoff-branch/SKILL.md && echo "OK: kickoff-branch valid" || echo "FAIL: kickoff-branch missing"`
125
+
126
+
122
127
  ## Handoff
123
128
 
124
129
  Gate: READY -> next: develop-tdd
@@ -69,3 +69,7 @@ Compile all findings into `specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md`. This file ser
69
69
  - Before a major refactor or architectural change.
70
70
  - When `survey-context` reveals a lack of domain knowledge.
71
71
  - To refresh `specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md` after significant changes.
72
+
73
+ ## Verify
74
+
75
+ → verify: `test -f map-codebase/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' map-codebase/SKILL.md && echo "OK: map-codebase valid" || echo "FAIL: map-codebase missing"`
@@ -96,3 +96,7 @@ When the plan touches shared state, async, or multi-threaded code:
96
96
  - [ ] For each: who reads, who writes, synchronization mechanism (lock, actor, immutable copy).
97
97
  - [ ] Flag **race risks** (check-then-act, non-atomic read-modify-write) with severity.
98
98
  - [ ] Record findings in `specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md` under `## Concurrency` or in an ADR if architectural.
99
+
100
+ ## Verify
101
+
102
+ → verify: `test -f model-domain/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' model-domain/SKILL.md && echo "OK: model-domain valid" || echo "FAIL: model-domain missing"`
@@ -66,3 +66,7 @@ All phases complete with artifacts:
66
66
  ```bash
67
67
  verify: test -f specs/state.yaml && test -f specs/release-plan.yaml && test -f specs/product/SCOPE_LATEST.yaml && ls specs/epics/*.yaml 1>/dev/null && echo "✅ All phases complete"
68
68
  ```
69
+
70
+ ## Verify
71
+
72
+ → verify: `test -f orchestrate-project/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' orchestrate-project/SKILL.md && echo "OK: orchestrate-project valid" || echo "FAIL: orchestrate-project missing"`
@@ -75,3 +75,7 @@ Do this when the repo is under Git and the cleanup surfaced **untracked** noise:
75
75
  5. **Verify**: run `git check-ignore -v <path>` on 2–3 representative paths.
76
76
 
77
77
  See [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md) for shell patterns, `.gitignore` mechanics, and safety checks.
78
+
79
+ ## Verify
80
+
81
+ → verify: `test -f organize-workspace/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' organize-workspace/SKILL.md && echo "OK: organize-workspace valid" || echo "FAIL: organize-workspace missing"`
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "bigpowers",
3
- "version": "2.43.3",
3
+ "version": "2.43.5",
4
4
  "description": "72 agent skills synthesizing 17 years of software engineering discipline into a prescriptive methodology for solo developers",
5
5
  "main": "index.js",
6
6
  "scripts": {
@@ -76,3 +76,7 @@ Any further notes about the refactor.
76
76
  </refactor-plan-template>
77
77
 
78
78
  After writing `specs/REFACTOR_LATEST.md`, suggest running `kickoff-branch` next to create a refactor branch.
79
+
80
+ ## Verify
81
+
82
+ → verify: `test -f plan-refactor/SKILL.md && grep -q '^name:' plan-refactor/SKILL.md && echo "OK: plan-refactor valid" || echo "FAIL: plan-refactor missing"`