axiom-coding-agent-setup 1.0.11 → 1.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.agents/CONTEXT-MANAGEMENT.md +155 -0
- package/.agents/DEBUGGING.md +124 -0
- package/.agents/{engineering.md → ENGINEERING.md} +6 -0
- package/.agents/PERFORMANCE.md +164 -0
- package/.agents/SECURITY.md +109 -0
- package/.agents/{workflow.md → WORKFLOW.md} +7 -1
- package/.agents/skills/project-design/SKILL.md +207 -0
- package/.agents/skills/project-design/references/ARCHITECTURE.md +641 -0
- package/.agents/skills/project-design/references/PROJECT_PLAN.md +316 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/LICENSE.txt +202 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/SKILL.md +485 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/agents/analyzer.md +274 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/agents/comparator.md +202 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/agents/grader.md +223 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/assets/eval_review.html +146 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/eval-viewer/generate_review.py +471 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/eval-viewer/viewer.html +1325 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/references/schemas.md +430 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/scripts/__init__.py +0 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/scripts/aggregate_benchmark.py +401 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/scripts/generate_report.py +326 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/scripts/improve_description.py +247 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/scripts/package_skill.py +136 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/scripts/quick_validate.py +103 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/scripts/run_eval.py +310 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/scripts/run_loop.py +328 -0
- package/.agents/skills/skill-creator/scripts/utils.py +47 -0
- package/AGENTS.md +68 -4
- package/README.md +42 -6
- package/bin/cli.js +15 -6
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/plugin/oh-my-openagent.json +198 -0
- package/plugin/oh-my-openagent.md +49 -0
- package/skills-lock.json +6 -0
- /package/.agents/{stack.md → STACK.md} +0 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Context Management
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## The Context Problem
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
AI agents have limited context windows. Every token counts. Wasted context = degraded reasoning = worse output. Managing context is a core competency of a world-class agent.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Context Budget Principles
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
### The 50% Rule
|
|
12
|
+
When context reaches ~50% of the window, proactively compact. Don't wait until you're forced to.
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
### Every Token Must Earn Its Place
|
|
15
|
+
Before including anything in context, ask:
|
|
16
|
+
- Does this directly help solve the current task?
|
|
17
|
+
- Can I summarize this instead of including it verbatim?
|
|
18
|
+
- Is this already known from the conversation history?
|
|
19
|
+
- Would a file reference suffice instead of the full content?
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### Read Before Claiming, But Don't Read Everything
|
|
22
|
+
- Read files that are directly relevant to the current task
|
|
23
|
+
- Use search tools (grep, ast-grep) to find specific patterns without reading entire files
|
|
24
|
+
- Batch read multiple files when you know they're all needed
|
|
25
|
+
- Stop reading once you have sufficient understanding
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
---
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Context Compaction Strategy
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
### When to Compact
|
|
32
|
+
- Context exceeds 50% of window
|
|
33
|
+
- Starting a new sub-task within the same session
|
|
34
|
+
- Switching from exploration to implementation
|
|
35
|
+
- Before making a complex, multi-step change
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### How to Compact
|
|
38
|
+
1. **Summarize conversation history** — Replace long exchanges with key decisions and current state
|
|
39
|
+
2. **Remove completed work** — Move done items to a summary; keep only what's still open
|
|
40
|
+
3. **Replace file contents with references** — "See `src/auth.ts` for implementation" vs. full file content
|
|
41
|
+
4. **Use todo lists** — Track state externally (todo tool) instead of in conversation
|
|
42
|
+
5. **Extract key findings** — Move exploration results into a concise summary
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
### The Compact Format
|
|
45
|
+
```
|
|
46
|
+
## Session Summary
|
|
47
|
+
- Task: [one-line description]
|
|
48
|
+
- Status: [in progress / blocked / completed]
|
|
49
|
+
- Key decisions: [bullet list]
|
|
50
|
+
- Open items: [from todo list]
|
|
51
|
+
- Relevant files: [file paths only, not contents]
|
|
52
|
+
```
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
---
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## Session Discipline
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
### One Task Per Session
|
|
59
|
+
Switching tasks mid-session degrades quality. Use `/clear` or start a new session when pivoting.
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
### Session Lifecycle
|
|
62
|
+
1. **Setup** — Load relevant skills, read initial files, clarify requirements
|
|
63
|
+
2. **Exploration** — Search codebase, understand patterns, identify files to change
|
|
64
|
+
3. **Implementation** — Make changes, verify, test
|
|
65
|
+
4. **Verification** — Run tests, check for regressions, confirm requirements met
|
|
66
|
+
5. **Handoff** — Summarize what changed, what's still open, what needs follow-up
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
### Handoff Documentation
|
|
69
|
+
When ending a session or passing to another agent:
|
|
70
|
+
- What was completed
|
|
71
|
+
- What is still in progress
|
|
72
|
+
- What decisions were made and why
|
|
73
|
+
- What blockers exist
|
|
74
|
+
- What files were changed
|
|
75
|
+
- What tests were run and their results
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
---
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
## Parallel Execution & Context
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
### When to Parallelize
|
|
82
|
+
- Multiple independent file reads
|
|
83
|
+
- Multiple search queries
|
|
84
|
+
- Multiple test runs
|
|
85
|
+
- Independent implementation tasks
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
### When NOT to Parallelize
|
|
88
|
+
- Tasks that depend on each other's output
|
|
89
|
+
- Tasks that modify the same files
|
|
90
|
+
- Tasks that share mutable state
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
### Context Isolation
|
|
93
|
+
Each parallel agent/worker should receive:
|
|
94
|
+
- The specific task it's responsible for
|
|
95
|
+
- The minimal context needed for that task
|
|
96
|
+
- Clear boundaries on what it should NOT touch
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
---
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
## Codebase Navigation Without Context Bloat
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
### Grepping > Reading
|
|
103
|
+
Use grep/ast-grep to find specific patterns without loading entire files into context.
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Symbol Search > File Reading
|
|
106
|
+
Use LSP symbol search to find where something is defined, then read only that definition.
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
### References > Full Content
|
|
109
|
+
When you've already read a file once, reference it by path. Don't re-read it unless you need to verify current state.
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
### Tree > List
|
|
112
|
+
Use `tree` with depth limits to understand structure without listing every file.
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
---
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
## Memory Management for Long Sessions
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
### Progressive Disclosure
|
|
119
|
+
1. Start with high-level overview (tree, key files)
|
|
120
|
+
2. Read relevant files as needed
|
|
121
|
+
3. Compact and summarize before diving deeper
|
|
122
|
+
4. Reference, don't repeat
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
### The Rule of Three
|
|
125
|
+
If you find yourself re-reading the same file more than 3 times in a session, something is wrong:
|
|
126
|
+
- You didn't understand it the first time (take notes)
|
|
127
|
+
- You're working on too many things at once (narrow scope)
|
|
128
|
+
- The file is too large and needs refactoring (flag it)
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
### State Persistence
|
|
131
|
+
Use external tools for state:
|
|
132
|
+
- **Todo lists** — Track progress without consuming context
|
|
133
|
+
- **File system** — Write summaries to temp files
|
|
134
|
+
- **Session state** — Use session variables for cross-turn data
|
|
135
|
+
|
|
136
|
+
---
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
## Context Anti-Patterns
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Hurts |
|
|
141
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
142
|
+
| **Including entire files** | Eats context budget; most of the file is irrelevant |
|
|
143
|
+
| **Repeating history** | Every turn doesn't need full conversation replay |
|
|
144
|
+
| **Loading unrelated skills** | Only load skills relevant to the current task |
|
|
145
|
+
| **Parallelizing dependent tasks** | Results in conflicts, wasted work, context pollution |
|
|
146
|
+
| **Never compacting** | Context degrades until the agent starts hallucinating or making mistakes |
|
|
147
|
+
| **Over-reading** | Reading 20 files when 3 would suffice |
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
---
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
## The Ultimate Rule
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
**Context is your most precious resource. Spend it wisely.**
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
Every byte of context should directly contribute to producing correct, high-quality output. If it doesn't, remove it.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Debugging Methodology
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## The Golden Rule of Debugging
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
**Never guess. Always observe.**
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Debugging is not about being smart — it's about being systematic. The fastest way to fix a bug is to understand it completely before touching code.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
---
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## The Debugging Protocol
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### Phase 1: Reproduction
|
|
14
|
+
1. **Can you reproduce it consistently?** If not, find the pattern.
|
|
15
|
+
2. **What are the exact steps?** Document them precisely.
|
|
16
|
+
3. **What is the smallest input that triggers it?** Minimize the reproduction case.
|
|
17
|
+
4. **When did it last work?** Use `git bisect` to find the offending commit.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
### Phase 2: Observation
|
|
20
|
+
1. **Read the error message carefully** — not just the first line, the full stack trace
|
|
21
|
+
2. **Check the obvious first** — null pointers, off-by-one, typos, recent changes
|
|
22
|
+
3. **Inspect the state** — print/LOG variables at key points; don't assume you know their values
|
|
23
|
+
4. **Trace the data flow** — where does the bad value come from?
|
|
24
|
+
5. **Check boundaries** — empty collections, first/last items, zero, null, max values
|
|
25
|
+
6. **Check the environment** — different OS, different Node version, different database state
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### Phase 3: Hypothesis
|
|
28
|
+
1. **Form a specific, testable hypothesis** — "The bug is caused by X because Y"
|
|
29
|
+
2. **Design an experiment to prove or disprove it** — a test, a log, a minimal change
|
|
30
|
+
3. **If disproven, discard and form a new hypothesis** — don't cling to wrong theories
|
|
31
|
+
4. **If proven, fix the root cause** — not the symptom
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
### Phase 4: Fix & Verify
|
|
34
|
+
1. **Fix the root cause, not the symptom** — suppressing the error message is not fixing the bug
|
|
35
|
+
2. **Verify the fix** — run the reproduction case; it should pass
|
|
36
|
+
3. **Verify you didn't break anything else** — run the full test suite
|
|
37
|
+
4. **Add a regression test** — ensure this bug never returns
|
|
38
|
+
5. **Document what you learned** — if it was tricky, save the next engineer the trouble
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
---
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
## Debugging Techniques
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
### Binary Search (Divide and Conquer)
|
|
45
|
+
When you don't know where the bug is:
|
|
46
|
+
1. Add a check/log at the midpoint of the suspected code path
|
|
47
|
+
2. Determine if the bug is before or after that point
|
|
48
|
+
3. Repeat, halving the search space each time
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
### Rubber Duck Debugging
|
|
51
|
+
Explain the bug out loud (or in writing) to an inanimate object. Forcing yourself to articulate the problem often reveals the solution.
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
### Git Bisect
|
|
54
|
+
When you know it worked before:
|
|
55
|
+
```bash
|
|
56
|
+
git bisect start
|
|
57
|
+
git bisect bad HEAD
|
|
58
|
+
git bisect good <last-known-good-commit>
|
|
59
|
+
# Git will checkout commits; test and mark good/bad until it finds the culprit
|
|
60
|
+
```
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
### Backwards from the Error
|
|
63
|
+
Start at the crash/error and trace backwards:
|
|
64
|
+
1. What function threw the error?
|
|
65
|
+
2. What called that function?
|
|
66
|
+
3. What data was passed?
|
|
67
|
+
4. Where did that data come from?
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### Isolate Variables
|
|
70
|
+
Change one thing at a time:
|
|
71
|
+
- Does it fail on a different machine?
|
|
72
|
+
- Does it fail with a different database?
|
|
73
|
+
- Does it fail with different input?
|
|
74
|
+
- Does it fail with the previous commit?
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
---
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
## Common Bug Categories & Patterns
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
| Symptom | Likely Causes |
|
|
81
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
82
|
+
| Works on my machine | Environment differences, missing env vars, different versions |
|
|
83
|
+
| Intermittent failure | Race condition, timing issue, external dependency flakiness |
|
|
84
|
+
| Works after restart | Memory leak, state corruption, resource exhaustion |
|
|
85
|
+
| Only fails with large data | Buffer overflow, timeout, memory limit, algorithmic complexity |
|
|
86
|
+
| Works in tests, fails in prod | Different data, different config, different permissions |
|
|
87
|
+
| Works in prod, fails in tests | Test isolation, mock mismatch, different environment setup |
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
---
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails |
|
|
94
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
95
|
+
| **Shotgun debugging** | Randomly changing things hoping something works. You learn nothing and introduce new bugs. |
|
|
96
|
+
| **Print-driven development** | Adding `console.log` everywhere instead of understanding the flow. Clutters code and output. |
|
|
97
|
+
| **Commenting out code** | "Maybe if I disable this..." You hide the symptom without fixing the cause. |
|
|
98
|
+
| **Blaming the compiler/framework** | It's almost never the compiler. Check your assumptions first. |
|
|
99
|
+
| **Ignoring the stack trace** | The answer is usually in the stack trace. Read it fully. |
|
|
100
|
+
| **Fixing without reproducing** | If you can't reproduce it, you can't verify your fix. |
|
|
101
|
+
| **Not adding a regression test** | The same bug will come back. Guaranteed. |
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
---
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
## Debugging Tools
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
- **Stack traces** — Read bottom-up: the error is at the bottom, the call chain above it
|
|
108
|
+
- **Breakpoints** — Pause execution and inspect state (better than print statements)
|
|
109
|
+
- **Diff tools** — Compare working vs broken state (files, configs, database dumps)
|
|
110
|
+
- **Log aggregation** — Centralized logs for tracing requests across services
|
|
111
|
+
- **Request tracing** — Trace IDs to follow a single request through multiple services
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
---
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
## When to Ask for Help
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
Stop and escalate when:
|
|
118
|
+
- You've spent 30+ minutes without progress
|
|
119
|
+
- The bug involves a third-party library you don't control
|
|
120
|
+
- It requires access to production data or systems you don't have
|
|
121
|
+
- You're tempted to add a hack/workaround instead of a real fix
|
|
122
|
+
- The fix would change security-critical code
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
**Debugging is a skill. The more methodical you are, the faster you solve problems.**
|
|
@@ -122,6 +122,12 @@ Log what's surprising, not what's expected.
|
|
|
122
122
|
| Untested happy paths | You find bugs in production, not staging |
|
|
123
123
|
| Architecture by autocomplete | AI-generated structure without architectural judgment |
|
|
124
124
|
| Dependency sprawl | Each dependency is a supply chain risk and a maintenance burden |
|
|
125
|
+
| Blind retries | Same failed command in a loop; wastes time and obscures real issues. See WORKFLOW.md |
|
|
126
|
+
| Suppressing type errors | `as any`, `@ts-ignore` hide real bugs; fix the root cause. See AGENTS.md |
|
|
127
|
+
| Empty catch blocks | `catch(e) {}` swallows errors; log and handle or don't catch. See AGENTS.md |
|
|
128
|
+
| Cargo-culting patterns | Copying solutions without understanding why; wrong tool for the job. See AGENTS.md |
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
> **Domain-specific anti-patterns:** See DEBUGGING.md (debugging anti-patterns) and PERFORMANCE.md (performance anti-patterns) for detailed coverage.
|
|
125
131
|
|
|
126
132
|
---
|
|
127
133
|
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Performance Awareness
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Mindset: Measure First, Optimize Second
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Premature optimization is the root of all evil — but so is shipping code that falls over at scale. The key is knowing when to care and what to measure.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## The Performance Hierarchy
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
Optimize in this order:
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
1. **Algorithmic complexity** — O(n²) will always beat O(n) eventually, regardless of micro-optimizations
|
|
14
|
+
2. **Database queries** — N+1 queries, missing indexes, and full table scans kill performance
|
|
15
|
+
3. **I/O bottlenecks** — Network calls, disk reads, file system operations
|
|
16
|
+
4. **Memory allocation** — Excessive object creation, memory leaks, large data structures
|
|
17
|
+
5. **Micro-optimizations** — Loop unrolling, cache locality (last resort, measure impact)
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
---
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Key Metrics
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
### Response Time
|
|
24
|
+
| Target | Acceptable | Warning | Critical |
|
|
25
|
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26
|
+
| API response | < 100ms | < 500ms | > 1s |
|
|
27
|
+
| Page load | < 1s | < 3s | > 5s |
|
|
28
|
+
| Database query | < 10ms | < 100ms | > 500ms |
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
### Throughput
|
|
31
|
+
- Requests per second (RPS) your system can handle
|
|
32
|
+
- Concurrent connections supported
|
|
33
|
+
- Queue depth and wait times
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
### Resource Utilization
|
|
36
|
+
- CPU: sustained > 70% is a warning
|
|
37
|
+
- Memory: monitor for leaks and growth over time
|
|
38
|
+
- Disk I/O: random reads are expensive; sequential is cheap
|
|
39
|
+
- Network: bandwidth and latency to dependent services
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
---
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
## Caching Strategy
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### When to Cache
|
|
46
|
+
- **Static assets** — Cache aggressively (CDN, browser cache)
|
|
47
|
+
- **Database queries** — Cache results that change infrequently
|
|
48
|
+
- **Computed values** — Cache expensive calculations
|
|
49
|
+
- **API responses** — Cache external API calls with appropriate TTL
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### When NOT to Cache
|
|
52
|
+
- **User-specific data** — unless scoped to that user
|
|
53
|
+
- **Real-time data** — stock prices, live feeds
|
|
54
|
+
- **Small, cheap computations** — cache overhead > computation cost
|
|
55
|
+
- **Data that must be consistent** — cache invalidation is hard
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
### Cache Invalidation
|
|
58
|
+
```
|
|
59
|
+
"There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
|
|
60
|
+
cache invalidation and naming things."
|
|
61
|
+
```
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
- Prefer **TTL-based** expiration for simplicity
|
|
64
|
+
- Use **write-through** or **write-behind** for consistency-critical data
|
|
65
|
+
- **Never** cache without an invalidation strategy
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
---
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
## Database Performance
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### Query Optimization
|
|
72
|
+
- **Indexing** — Index columns used in WHERE, JOIN, ORDER BY. Don't over-index (writes slow down).
|
|
73
|
+
- **N+1 Problem** — Fetch related data in a single query (JOIN) or batch queries
|
|
74
|
+
- **Pagination** — Never `SELECT *` without LIMIT on large tables
|
|
75
|
+
- **Explain plans** — Use `EXPLAIN` (PostgreSQL) or `EXPLAIN ANALYZE` to understand query execution
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
### Connection Management
|
|
78
|
+
- Use connection pooling (PgBouncer, SQLAlchemy pool, Prisma connection pool)
|
|
79
|
+
- Close connections promptly; don't leak them
|
|
80
|
+
- Monitor pool exhaustion
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
---
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
## Async & Concurrency
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
### When to Use Async
|
|
87
|
+
- **I/O-bound work** — API calls, database queries, file reads
|
|
88
|
+
- **Many concurrent operations** — handling thousands of connections
|
|
89
|
+
- **Not for CPU-bound work** — use threads/processes instead
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
### Concurrency Patterns
|
|
92
|
+
- **Batching** — Group small operations into larger ones
|
|
93
|
+
- **Parallelization** — Run independent operations concurrently
|
|
94
|
+
- **Streaming** — Process data as it arrives, not all at once
|
|
95
|
+
- **Backpressure** — Slow down producers when consumers can't keep up
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
---
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
## Frontend Performance
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
### Core Web Vitals
|
|
102
|
+
- **LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)** — < 2.5s (main content loaded)
|
|
103
|
+
- **FID (First Input Delay)** — < 100ms (page is interactive)
|
|
104
|
+
- **CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)** — < 0.1 (visual stability)
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
### Techniques
|
|
107
|
+
- **Code splitting** — Load only what the user needs
|
|
108
|
+
- **Lazy loading** — Images, components, routes load on demand
|
|
109
|
+
- **Tree shaking** — Remove unused code at build time
|
|
110
|
+
- **Image optimization** — WebP, responsive sizes, lazy loading
|
|
111
|
+
- **Minimize main thread work** — Offload to web workers where possible
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
---
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
## Profiling & Measurement
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
### Before Optimizing
|
|
118
|
+
1. **Profile** — Find the actual bottleneck, not the suspected one
|
|
119
|
+
2. **Benchmark** — Measure current performance as a baseline
|
|
120
|
+
3. **Hypothesize** — Predict the impact of the optimization
|
|
121
|
+
4. **Implement** — Make the change
|
|
122
|
+
5. **Verify** — Did it actually help? If not, revert.
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
### Tools
|
|
125
|
+
- **Node.js** — `node --prof`, clinic.js, 0x
|
|
126
|
+
- **Python** — cProfile, py-spot, line_profiler
|
|
127
|
+
- **Browser** — Chrome DevTools Performance tab, Lighthouse
|
|
128
|
+
- **Database** — `EXPLAIN ANALYZE`, `pg_stat_statements`, slow query log
|
|
129
|
+
- **System** — `htop`, `iotop`, `netstat`, Prometheus + Grafana
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
---
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
## Performance Anti-Patterns
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Hurts |
|
|
136
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
137
|
+
| **Optimizing without measuring** | You optimize the wrong thing. The real bottleneck remains. |
|
|
138
|
+
| **Caching everything** | Cache invalidation nightmares, stale data, memory bloat |
|
|
139
|
+
| **Ignoring Big O** | O(n²) with n=1000 is 1M operations. It will always be slow. |
|
|
140
|
+
| **Blocking the main thread** | In async systems, synchronous I/O blocks everything |
|
|
141
|
+
| **Loading everything at once** | Memory exhaustion, slow startup, poor UX |
|
|
142
|
+
| **No connection pooling** | Connection overhead dominates; database chokes |
|
|
143
|
+
| **Giant transactions** | Lock contention, timeouts, rollback nightmares |
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
---
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
## When Performance Matters
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
**Always:**
|
|
150
|
+
- User-facing response times
|
|
151
|
+
- APIs that serve mobile clients
|
|
152
|
+
- Batch processing that runs on a schedule
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
**Sometimes:**
|
|
155
|
+
- Internal tools (if used by many people)
|
|
156
|
+
- Build times (developer productivity)
|
|
157
|
+
- Test suite speed (feedback loop)
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
**Rarely:**
|
|
160
|
+
- One-off scripts
|
|
161
|
+
- Prototypes and MVPs (but document the debt)
|
|
162
|
+
- Code that's not on the critical path
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
**Measure. Then optimize. Then measure again.**
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Security Principles
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Mindset: Security Is Not a Feature
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Security is a property of every decision, not a checkbox at the end. Treat every input as malicious until proven otherwise. Treat every dependency as compromised until audited. Treat every secret as leaked until rotated.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## The Security Checklist
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
Before shipping any code, verify these:
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### Input Validation
|
|
14
|
+
- [ ] All user inputs are validated at trust boundaries (API, CLI, form, file upload)
|
|
15
|
+
- [ ] Validation happens before any processing — not as an afterthought
|
|
16
|
+
- [ ] Whitelist over blacklist: define what's allowed, not what's forbidden
|
|
17
|
+
- [ ] Type, length, format, and range are all constrained
|
|
18
|
+
- [ ] File uploads: check MIME type, extension, size, and scan for malicious content
|
|
19
|
+
- [ ] Deserialization: never blindly deserialize untrusted data (pickle, YAML, XML, JSON with custom decoders)
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### Secrets Management
|
|
22
|
+
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets in source code (API keys, passwords, tokens)
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Environment variables or secret managers only
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] `.env` files are in `.gitignore`
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] No secrets in logs, error messages, or stack traces
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Rotate secrets when team members leave or when compromise is suspected
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Different secrets for dev/staging/prod — never share production keys with dev environments
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### Authentication & Authorization
|
|
30
|
+
- [ ] Authentication on every endpoint that isn't explicitly public
|
|
31
|
+
- [ ] Principle of least privilege: users get the minimum access they need
|
|
32
|
+
- [ ] Never trust client-side authorization checks — verify on the server
|
|
33
|
+
- [ ] Session tokens: secure, httpOnly, sameSite cookies; short expiry with refresh tokens
|
|
34
|
+
- [ ] Rate limiting on auth endpoints (login, register, password reset)
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
### Data Protection
|
|
37
|
+
- [ ] Sensitive data encrypted at rest (database, files, backups)
|
|
38
|
+
- [ ] Sensitive data encrypted in transit (TLS 1.2+, no downgrade)
|
|
39
|
+
- [ ] PII minimized: collect only what's necessary, delete when no longer needed
|
|
40
|
+
- [ ] Database queries parameterized — never string-concatenate SQL
|
|
41
|
+
- [ ] No sensitive data in URL parameters or client-side storage
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
### Dependency Security
|
|
44
|
+
- [ ] Audit dependencies before adding them: maintenance status, known vulnerabilities, supply chain risk
|
|
45
|
+
- [ ] Pin versions in lock files; use `npm audit`, `pip-audit`, `cargo audit`
|
|
46
|
+
- [ ] Review what a dependency does before trusting it with secrets or user data
|
|
47
|
+
- [ ] Prefer well-maintained, widely-used libraries over obscure ones
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
---
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## Common Attack Vectors
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
| Attack | Prevention |
|
|
54
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
55
|
+
| **Injection** (SQL, NoSQL, Command, LDAP) | Parameterized queries, input sanitization, avoid `eval`/`exec` |
|
|
56
|
+
| **XSS** (Cross-Site Scripting) | Escape output, Content-Security-Policy, sanitize HTML |
|
|
57
|
+
| **CSRF** (Cross-Site Request Forgery) | CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies, verify Origin header |
|
|
58
|
+
| **Path Traversal** | Canonicalize paths, whitelist allowed directories, no user-controlled paths |
|
|
59
|
+
| **SSRF** (Server-Side Request Forgery) | Whitelist outbound URLs, no user-controlled destinations |
|
|
60
|
+
| **Deserialization** | Avoid deserializing untrusted data; use safe formats (JSON with schema validation) |
|
|
61
|
+
| **IDOR** (Insecure Direct Object Reference) | Verify ownership on every resource access; use UUIDs not sequential IDs |
|
|
62
|
+
| **Race Conditions** | Atomic operations, proper locking, idempotent endpoints |
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
---
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
## Security-First Development Patterns
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
### Defensive Coding
|
|
69
|
+
```python
|
|
70
|
+
# BAD: Trusting user input
|
|
71
|
+
query = f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}"
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
# GOOD: Parameterized query
|
|
74
|
+
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", (user_id,))
|
|
75
|
+
```
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
### Fail Securely
|
|
78
|
+
```python
|
|
79
|
+
# BAD: Default allow
|
|
80
|
+
if user.is_admin:
|
|
81
|
+
allow_access()
|
|
82
|
+
else:
|
|
83
|
+
deny_access()
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
# GOOD: Default deny
|
|
86
|
+
if not user.is_authenticated or not user.is_admin:
|
|
87
|
+
raise PermissionDenied()
|
|
88
|
+
allow_access()
|
|
89
|
+
```
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
### Secure Defaults
|
|
92
|
+
- Framework security features enabled by default (CSRF protection, XSS filters)
|
|
93
|
+
- No debug mode in production
|
|
94
|
+
- No open CORS (`*`) in production
|
|
95
|
+
- No stack traces exposed to end users
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
---
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
## When to Escalate
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
Stop and ask the human when:
|
|
102
|
+
- Handling production secrets or credentials
|
|
103
|
+
- Modifying authentication/authorization logic
|
|
104
|
+
- Adding new external dependencies with network access
|
|
105
|
+
- Processing sensitive user data (PII, health, financial)
|
|
106
|
+
- Deploying to production environments
|
|
107
|
+
- Anything involving encryption key management
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
**Security is not "I'll fix it later." Security is now.**
|
|
@@ -57,9 +57,12 @@ I apply this hierarchy before making any claim about a system:
|
|
|
57
57
|
- If I discover something unexpected (a bug, a design issue, a missing dependency), surface it rather than silently working around it
|
|
58
58
|
|
|
59
59
|
### When Stuck
|
|
60
|
-
- State what
|
|
60
|
+
- State what you know, what you've tried, and what specifically is unclear
|
|
61
61
|
- Propose a path forward even if uncertain: "I think X, but I'm not sure about Y — can you verify?"
|
|
62
62
|
- Never spin in place without surfacing the blocker
|
|
63
|
+
- **After 3 failed attempts on the same problem**: stop, revert to last known working state, and escalate to the human with full context
|
|
64
|
+
- **Never retry the same failed command blindly** — analyze the error, fix the root cause, then retry
|
|
65
|
+
- **Never enter infinite loops** — whether command retries, file edits, or test fixes: if it's not working, stop and explain
|
|
63
66
|
|
|
64
67
|
### Completing Work
|
|
65
68
|
1. Verify the implementation empirically (not just by reading code)
|
|
@@ -110,6 +113,9 @@ When presenting solutions, include:
|
|
|
110
113
|
|
|
111
114
|
## Context Management (for Agentic Sessions)
|
|
112
115
|
|
|
116
|
+
> **For comprehensive context strategy**, see CONTEXT-MANAGEMENT.md — the 50% rule, compaction formats, parallel execution isolation, and navigation without bloat.
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
Quick reminders:
|
|
113
119
|
- **Compact context proactively** — don't let context fill before acting; use `/compact` at ~50% context
|
|
114
120
|
- **One task per session** — switching tasks mid-session degrades quality; use `/clear` when pivoting
|
|
115
121
|
- **Recall relevant files by reading them** — don't rely on memory of previous edits in long sessions; re-read to confirm current state
|