auxiliar-mcp 0.16.0 → 0.18.0

package/dist/data/capabilities.generated.json

@@ -367,7 +367,17 @@
         "name": "Algolia",
         "description": "The most popular hosted search-as-a-service. Fastest query speeds, largest ecosystem with InstantSearch UI widgets, but pricing scales aggressively.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Algolia Inc. $2.25B valuation, founded 2012. Powers search for Stripe, Twitch, Slack, and thousands more. Risk: near zero for availability; pricing complexity is the main concern.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Algolia when you need the fastest, most feature-rich hosted search and can afford the pricing — always negotiate.\n\nAlgolia is the most established hosted search solution. Sub-millisecond queries, the best UI widget ecosystem (InstantSearch), built-in analytics, and A/B testing. The tradeoff is cost — pricing scales aggressively, and vendor lock-in is real. Always negotiate pricing (30-60% off is standard) and evaluate Typesense as an alternative before committing.\n\n**Best for.** E-commerce, SaaS dashboards, documentation sites, and any app where search quality directly impacts revenue\n\n**Avoid if.** You're cost-sensitive, want to self-host, or your search needs are simple enough for PostgreSQL FTS",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "hosted-search-as-a-service",
+            "ecommerce-product-search",
+            "sub-millisecond-search-queries",
+            "instantsearch-ui-widgets",
+            "saas-dashboard-search",
+            "documentation-site-search",
+            "search-ab-testing",
+            "search-analytics",
+            "algolia-typesense-comparison"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "search"
@@ -499,7 +509,16 @@
         "name": "Anthropic",
         "description": "Claude 4.5 and 4.6 models, strongest coding and analysis capabilities. Best safety and alignment practices. Strongest privacy commitments among frontier labs.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2021, $7.6B+ raised. Strong safety focus. Notable customers include Amazon, Notion, DuckDuckGo. Leading in coding benchmarks. Risk: smaller ecosystem than OpenAI.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Anthropic for coding, analysis, and safety-critical applications where quality and privacy matter more than ecosystem breadth.\n\nAnthropic's Claude models lead in coding benchmarks and long-context analysis. The company has the strongest privacy commitments and safety practices among frontier labs. The main limitation is a smaller third-party ecosystem compared to OpenAI. For coding agents, Claude is the top choice.\n\n**Best for.** Coding agents, long-document analysis, safety-critical applications, privacy-sensitive workloads\n\n**Avoid if.** You need the broadest plugin ecosystem (use OpenAI) or cheapest inference (use Groq)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "claude-coding-agent",
+            "long-context-document-analysis",
+            "safety-critical-llm",
+            "privacy-sensitive-llm-workloads",
+            "frontier-model-inference",
+            "code-generation-llm",
+            "high-quality-text-analysis",
+            "alignment-focused-llm"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "llm"
@@ -744,7 +763,16 @@
         "name": "Auth0",
         "description": "Enterprise-grade identity platform. Feature-rich but expensive — pricing has drifted upward since Okta acquisition in 2022.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Acquired by Okta in 2022. Enterprise-stable but developer trust declining due to pricing increases and product direction changes post-acquisition.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Auth0 only when you need enterprise compliance (HIPAA, FedRAMP, SAML) — for everything else, choose Clerk or Auth.js instead.\n\nAuth0 remains the most feature-complete auth platform — SAML, LDAP, HIPAA, FedRAMP, every social provider. But the Okta acquisition has led to pricing increases and developer trust erosion. For new projects, Clerk offers better DX and Auth.js offers zero vendor lock-in. Auth0's strength is still enterprise compliance — if you need HIPAA or FedRAMP, it's one of few options.\n\n**Best for.** Enterprise apps needing SAML/LDAP, regulated industries (HIPAA, FedRAMP)\n\n**Avoid if.** Startup on a budget, or you don't need enterprise compliance features",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "saml-sso-integration",
+            "ldap-enterprise-auth",
+            "hipaa-compliant-authentication",
+            "fedramp-identity-provider",
+            "enterprise-sso-provider",
+            "social-login-all-providers",
+            "regulated-industry-auth",
+            "multi-tenant-enterprise-auth"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "auth"
@@ -881,7 +909,16 @@
         "name": "Auth.js",
         "description": "MAINTENANCE MODE: Auth.js team joined Better Auth in Sept 2025. v5 never left beta. Use Better Auth for new projects.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** MAINTENANCE MODE. Auth.js team officially joined Better Auth (Sept 2025). v5 will never leave beta. For new projects, use Better Auth instead. Existing v4/v5 projects continue to work but no new features.\n\n**Verdict.** Do NOT use Auth.js for new projects — it is in maintenance mode. Use Better Auth instead. Only use Auth.js to maintain existing NextAuth v4/v5 projects.\n\nAuth.js is the right choice for teams that want to own their auth stack. Zero cost per user, no vendor lock-in, and works with any database. The trade-off is real: you build the UI, you handle security hardening, you manage the infrastructure. For experienced teams this is a feature, not a bug. For teams that need to ship fast, Clerk or Firebase Auth will get you there faster.\n\n**Best for.** Experienced teams, open-source-first projects, cost-sensitive apps at scale, projects needing full data ownership\n\n**Avoid if.** Small team needing to ship fast, no security expertise, or you need enterprise SSO (SAML/LDAP) out of the box",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "maintain-existing-nextauth-project",
+            "nextauth-v4-maintenance",
+            "self-hosted-auth-no-vendor-lockin",
+            "oauth-social-login-integration",
+            "zero-cost-per-user-auth",
+            "bring-your-own-database-auth",
+            "open-source-auth-stack",
+            "migrate-away-from-nextauth"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "auth"
@@ -1372,7 +1409,17 @@
         "element_type": "skill",
         "name": "auxiliar-solve",
         "description": "OCR / PDF extraction / NFS-e invoice tool ranker. Top pick Surya 76.9% word accuracy on 10-doc Brazilian corpus (NFS-e, boletos, phone receipts). Also ranked: Tesseract 5, Google Document AI. Via auxiliar-mcp solve_task.",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "ocr-tool-ranking",
+            "pdf-text-extraction",
+            "nfse-invoice-parsing",
+            "brazilian-invoice-ocr",
+            "boleto-data-extraction",
+            "document-ai-comparison",
+            "meta-ranker-tool-selection",
+            "receipt-ocr-accuracy",
+            "cross-task-tool-routing"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "skill",
@@ -1430,7 +1477,18 @@
         "name": "AWS RDS",
         "description": "Amazon's managed relational database. Battle-tested and feature-complete, but complex pricing with many hidden add-on costs.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Amazon (AWS). Maximum stability. Not going anywhere. Risk: complex pricing with many hidden dimensions, vendor lock-in to AWS ecosystem.\n\n**Verdict.** Choose AWS RDS when you need enterprise-grade reliability on AWS and have the ops capacity to manage its complexity.\n\nAWS RDS is the most battle-tested managed database option. Multi-AZ, read replicas, automated backups, point-in-time recovery — everything you need for production. The trade-off is complexity: pricing has many dimensions, setup requires VPC/security group configuration, and you need RDS Proxy for serverless apps. For teams already on AWS with ops capacity, it's the reliable choice. For small teams and startups, Neon or Supabase get you running faster.\n\n**Best for.** Production apps on AWS, regulated industries, teams with ops capacity\n\n**Avoid if.** Small team wanting fast setup, not on AWS, or budget-constrained without reserved instances",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "managed-relational-database",
+            "postgres-on-aws",
+            "multi-az-database-setup",
+            "automated-database-backups",
+            "point-in-time-recovery",
+            "read-replica-configuration",
+            "rds-proxy-for-serverless",
+            "enterprise-database-compliance",
+            "vpc-secured-database",
+            "production-database-hosting"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "database"
@@ -1576,7 +1634,17 @@
         "name": "AWS S3",
         "description": "The industry standard for object storage. Most features, biggest ecosystem, but egress fees and IAM complexity add up.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Amazon Web Services, subsidiary of Amazon. Launched 2006. The original cloud storage. Zero risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use AWS S3 when you need the full feature set, are already on AWS, or require specific compliance certifications.\n\nS3 is the industry standard with the most features, biggest ecosystem, and broadest compliance coverage. Every tool, library, and service supports S3. The downsides are egress fees ($0.09/GB), IAM complexity, and a free tier that expires. For most new projects not already on AWS, Cloudflare R2 provides 80% of the functionality at 50% of the cost. Use S3 when you need its unique features or are committed to the AWS ecosystem.\n\n**Best for.** AWS-native projects, enterprise compliance (HIPAA/FedRAMP), archival (Glacier), event-driven architectures\n\n**Avoid if.** You want simple file storage with predictable pricing (use Cloudflare R2)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "object-storage-hosting",
+            "s3-compatible-storage",
+            "file-upload-storage",
+            "glacier-archival-storage",
+            "event-driven-s3-triggers",
+            "hipaa-compliant-storage",
+            "enterprise-object-storage",
+            "lifecycle-policy-management",
+            "aws-native-file-storage"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "storage"
@@ -1709,7 +1777,18 @@
         "name": "AWS SES",
         "description": "Amazon's email sending service. Cheapest at scale but complex setup requiring multiple AWS services. Best for teams already on AWS.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Amazon Web Services (Amazon). Massive enterprise, 18+ year track record. Risk: near zero for availability, but SES is a low-priority AWS service that gets slow feature updates.\n\n**Verdict.** Use AWS SES only if you are already on AWS and have ops capacity — otherwise pick Resend or Postmark and ship faster.\n\nAWS SES is the right choice if you're already on AWS and sending high volume. The per-email cost is unbeatable. But the setup cost is real: IAM, Lambda, SNS, CloudWatch, bounce handling — it's a full infrastructure project. For teams not already on AWS, or sending under 50K emails/month, a managed service like Resend or Postmark will save you weeks of setup time.\n\n**Best for.** Teams already on AWS sending 50K+ emails/month who have ops capacity\n\n**Avoid if.** Small team, first project, not on AWS, or need to ship email in a day",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "transactional-email-sending",
+            "bulk-email-at-scale",
+            "aws-native-email-service",
+            "high-volume-email-delivery",
+            "email-sending-api",
+            "low-cost-email-infrastructure",
+            "bounce-handling-setup",
+            "iam-email-permissions",
+            "ses-smtp-integration",
+            "serverless-email-with-lambda"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "email"
@@ -1848,7 +1927,17 @@
         "name": "AWS SQS",
         "description": "Fully managed message queue by AWS. Infinite scale, 1M free requests/month. Enterprise-grade but complex setup.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Amazon Web Services, subsidiary of Amazon. SQS launched 2006. The original cloud queue service. Zero risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use AWS SQS when you're on AWS and need a fully managed, infinitely scalable message queue with enterprise compliance.\n\nSQS is the most battle-tested message queue in the cloud — it's been running since 2006 and handles trillions of messages. The 1M requests/month free tier is generous. The main downside is AWS complexity — IAM, Lambda triggers, dead letter queues, and CloudWatch all need configuration. For most small teams not already on AWS, Trigger.dev or BullMQ provide a much simpler experience. SQS shines at scale and in enterprise environments.\n\n**Best for.** AWS-native projects, enterprise compliance (HIPAA/FedRAMP), high-scale message processing, event-driven architectures\n\n**Avoid if.** You're not on AWS (use BullMQ/Trigger.dev) or want simple background jobs with great DX (use Trigger.dev)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "managed-message-queue",
+            "aws-native-queue",
+            "infinite-scale-messaging",
+            "event-driven-architecture",
+            "dead-letter-queue-handling",
+            "hipaa-compliant-queue",
+            "sqs-lambda-trigger",
+            "high-throughput-message-processing",
+            "cloud-queue-service"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "queues"
@@ -2063,7 +2152,18 @@
         "name": "Better Auth",
         "description": "Open-source TypeScript auth framework. The Auth.js team joined Better Auth in Sept 2025, making it the recommended path forward for Next.js authentication.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Open-source project (MIT). Auth.js/NextAuth team joined in Sept 2025, bringing significant community trust. Active development with 50+ plugins. Risk: younger than Auth.js but now has the core NextAuth team behind it.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Better Auth for new projects that need full auth ownership — it is the official successor to Auth.js/NextAuth with the same core team.\n\nBetter Auth is now the recommended path forward for self-hosted auth in the Next.js ecosystem. The Auth.js team joining brings maturity and community trust. 40+ social providers, email/password, 2FA, passkeys, organizations — all via plugins. Since it runs against your own database, GDPR compliance is straightforward (deploy DB in EU). The trade-off vs Clerk is the same as Auth.js: you build the UI and handle security hardening.\n\n**Best for.** New projects needing self-hosted auth, GDPR-compliant apps, teams that want to own their auth stack\n\n**Avoid if.** Small team needing pre-built UI, or you need auth working in under an hour",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "self-hosted-auth-nextjs",
+            "auth-with-social-providers",
+            "gdpr-compliant-auth",
+            "email-password-auth",
+            "two-factor-auth-setup",
+            "passkey-authentication",
+            "multi-tenant-organizations-auth",
+            "authjs-successor-migration",
+            "zero-cost-user-auth",
+            "typescript-auth-framework"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "auth"
@@ -2617,7 +2717,17 @@
         "name": "BullMQ",
         "description": "Redis-based job queue for Node.js. Open source, battle-tested, zero recurring cost. The standard self-hosted queue.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Open source (MIT license). Created by Taskforce.sh (makers of Bull). 6K+ GitHub stars. Mature and stable. Very low risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use BullMQ for self-hosted job queues when you want zero recurring cost, full control, and battle-tested reliability.\n\nBullMQ is the standard self-hosted job queue for Node.js. It's battle-tested, MIT-licensed, and handles millions of jobs in production systems. The Redis dependency is the main consideration — you need Redis running somewhere. For teams comfortable managing infrastructure, BullMQ provides the best value (zero cost for the queue itself). For teams wanting zero ops, use Trigger.dev or Inngest.\n\n**Best for.** Self-hosted job processing, teams with Redis infrastructure, budget-conscious projects, production workloads\n\n**Avoid if.** You don't want to manage Redis (use Trigger.dev) or need complex durable workflows (use Inngest)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "nodejs-job-queue",
+            "redis-backed-queue",
+            "self-hosted-task-queue",
+            "background-job-processing",
+            "queue-with-zero-cost",
+            "bullmq-worker-setup",
+            "delayed-job-scheduling",
+            "concurrent-job-processing",
+            "open-source-queue-nodejs"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "queues"
@@ -2819,7 +2929,17 @@
         "name": "Chroma",
         "description": "Embedded vector database for AI applications. Open source, zero setup, runs in-process. Perfect for prototyping and local development. Cloud offering coming soon.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2022, $20M raised. Open source (Apache 2.0). Fast-growing community. Focus on developer experience and AI-native workflows. Risk: cloud not yet available; young company.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Chroma for prototyping, local development, and AI applications where embedded simplicity matters more than production scale.\n\nChroma provides the fastest time-to-working-prototype of any vector database. The embedded mode means zero infrastructure setup — just pip install and go. Auto-embedding from documents removes the need for separate embedding pipelines. The main limitation is no managed cloud yet, making it unsuitable for production deployments that need hosting.\n\n**Best for.** Prototyping, local AI development, notebooks, single-application embeddings, hackathons\n\n**Avoid if.** You need production-scale managed hosting (use Pinecone) or self-hosted HA (use Qdrant)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "embedded-vector-database",
+            "local-vector-search",
+            "prototype-vector-search",
+            "in-process-embedding-store",
+            "zero-setup-vector-db",
+            "document-auto-embedding",
+            "ai-app-prototyping",
+            "notebook-vector-search",
+            "hackathon-vector-store"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "vector"
@@ -10240,7 +10360,17 @@
         "name": "Clerk",
         "description": "Drop-in auth with pre-built UI components. 50K MRU free tier, but stores data in US only — GDPR risk for EU apps.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** YC startup, well-funded, growing fast. Risk: pricing scales aggressively at higher MAU.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Clerk when you need auth working in 10 minutes with polished React components — but model your per-MAU costs before committing.\n\nClerk is the best choice for getting auth working fast in a React/Next.js app. The pre-built components are polished, the docs are excellent, and you'll have auth working in 10 minutes. The risk is cost at scale ($0.02/MAU) and vendor lock-in. For small-to-mid projects, it's the clear winner. For large-scale or cost-sensitive projects, consider Auth.js (free, self-managed) or Firebase Auth (free up to 50K MAU).\n\n**Best for.** Startups, React/Next.js projects, teams that want auth done in a day\n\n**Avoid if.** Cost-sensitive at scale (100K+ MAU), need EU data residency, or can't accept vendor lock-in",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "auth-with-prebuilt-ui",
+            "nextjs-auth-integration",
+            "social-login-oauth",
+            "drop-in-react-auth-components",
+            "user-authentication-saas",
+            "magic-link-auth",
+            "mau-based-auth-pricing",
+            "clerk-auth-setup",
+            "auth-for-startups"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "auth"
@@ -10383,7 +10513,16 @@
         "name": "Cloudflare KV",
         "description": "Global key-value store on Cloudflare's edge network. Eventually consistent, edge-native, best for read-heavy config and caching.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Cloudflare, public company (NYSE: NET). $1.3B+ revenue. KV is a core product. Very low risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Cloudflare KV for read-heavy edge caching and config storage on the Cloudflare Workers platform.\n\nCloudflare KV is the simplest way to store key-value data at the edge. It's globally distributed, fast for reads, and tightly integrated with Cloudflare Workers. The main limitation is eventual consistency — writes take up to 60 seconds to propagate. It's ideal for configuration, feature flags, and edge caching where stale reads are acceptable. For anything requiring strong consistency or data structures, use Upstash or Redis Cloud.\n\n**Best for.** Cloudflare Workers projects, edge caching, feature flags, configuration storage, read-heavy workloads\n\n**Avoid if.** You need strong consistency (use Upstash), data structures (use Redis), or are not on Cloudflare",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "edge-kv-storage",
+            "cloudflare-workers-kv",
+            "edge-config-storage",
+            "feature-flags-at-edge",
+            "edge-caching-layer",
+            "globally-distributed-kv",
+            "read-heavy-edge-cache",
+            "workers-key-value-store"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cache"
@@ -10505,7 +10644,17 @@
         "name": "Cloudflare R2",
         "description": "S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees. Best value for read-heavy workloads, but fewer features than S3.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Cloudflare, public company (NYSE: NET). $1.3B+ revenue. R2 launched 2022. Very low risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Cloudflare R2 for S3-compatible storage where zero egress fees matter — especially read-heavy public assets.\n\nR2 is the best value for file storage in 2026 for most use cases. Zero egress fees make it 50-80% cheaper than S3 for read-heavy workloads. The S3-compatible API means migration is straightforward. The main limitation is fewer advanced features compared to S3 — no lifecycle policies, no Glacier, no native event triggers. For most web apps serving images, assets, and user uploads, R2 is the recommended choice.\n\n**Best for.** Static assets, user uploads, CDN origin, any read-heavy storage workload\n\n**Avoid if.** You need advanced S3 features (lifecycle, Glacier, S3 Select) or are deep in the AWS ecosystem",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "s3-compatible-object-storage",
+            "zero-egress-file-storage",
+            "store-user-uploads",
+            "serve-static-assets",
+            "cdn-origin-storage",
+            "read-heavy-blob-storage",
+            "image-and-asset-hosting",
+            "cheap-file-storage-api",
+            "migrate-from-s3"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "storage"
@@ -10621,7 +10770,17 @@
         "name": "Cloudinary",
         "description": "Image and video processing platform with built-in CDN. Best for media-heavy apps, but credit-based pricing is confusing.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Established company, founded 2012, acquired by STG in 2024. Used by Conde Nast, Fiverr, Rivian. Stable. Low risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Cloudinary when you need automatic image/video optimization and on-the-fly transformations with a built-in CDN.\n\nCloudinary is the leading media processing platform with excellent image optimization, on-the-fly URL-based transformations, and a global CDN. It's the right choice for media-heavy applications (e-commerce, social, publishing). The main drawbacks are the confusing credit-based pricing system and expensive video processing. For simple file storage without processing needs, R2 or S3 are simpler and cheaper.\n\n**Best for.** E-commerce product images, media-heavy apps, image/video optimization, responsive images\n\n**Avoid if.** You just need raw file storage (use R2/S3) or are on a tight budget (credit system is unpredictable)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "image-optimization-cdn",
+            "on-the-fly-image-transformations",
+            "url-based-image-resizing",
+            "video-processing-cdn",
+            "responsive-image-delivery",
+            "ecommerce-product-image-hosting",
+            "media-heavy-app-storage",
+            "automatic-format-conversion",
+            "image-transformation-pipeline"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "storage"
@@ -11694,7 +11853,16 @@
         "name": "Contentful",
         "description": "Headless CMS with API-first architecture. Enterprise-ready with mature ecosystem, but expensive and complex content modeling.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Established company, founded 2013, $300M+ raised. Used by Spotify, Vodafone, Staples. Stable and profitable. Low risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Contentful for enterprise teams that need a mature, API-first CMS with strong content workflows.\n\nContentful is the most established headless CMS with a proven track record at enterprise scale. The API is reliable, the ecosystem is mature, and multi-team workflows are well-supported. However, the 48 content type limit, high pricing ($300/mo minimum for paid), and complex migration tooling make it overkill for small teams.\n\n**Best for.** Enterprise teams, agencies, multi-market content operations\n\n**Avoid if.** Solo developers, small teams, budget-conscious projects (use Sanity or Strapi)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "headless-cms-api",
+            "enterprise-content-management",
+            "multi-team-content-workflows",
+            "api-first-cms",
+            "structured-content-modeling",
+            "multi-market-content-delivery",
+            "cms-with-rich-ecosystem",
+            "content-localization-at-scale"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cms"
@@ -12208,7 +12376,17 @@
         "name": "Datadog",
         "description": "Full-stack observability platform — metrics, logs, traces, APM. Enterprise-grade but expensive. Per-host pricing adds up fast.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Public company (NASDAQ: DDOG), founded 2010, $2B+ revenue. Used by Samsung, Airbnb, Peloton. Very low risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Datadog when you need full-stack observability across many services and have the budget for per-host pricing.\n\nDatadog is the most comprehensive observability platform — metrics, logs, traces, APM, synthetics, and more in one place. The correlations between signals are its killer feature. However, the per-host pricing model makes it prohibitively expensive for small teams and microservice architectures. For most startups, the combination of Sentry (errors) + PostHog (analytics) + Logtail (logs) costs a fraction of Datadog.\n\n**Best for.** Mid-to-large engineering teams, microservice architectures requiring correlated observability, enterprise compliance\n\n**Avoid if.** You're a small team or startup (use Sentry + PostHog + Logtail), or only need one type of monitoring",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "full-stack-observability",
+            "apm-tracing",
+            "metrics-logs-traces-correlation",
+            "infrastructure-monitoring",
+            "distributed-tracing-apm",
+            "log-aggregation-platform",
+            "synthetic-monitoring",
+            "microservices-observability",
+            "enterprise-monitoring-platform"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "monitoring"
@@ -12498,7 +12676,16 @@
         "name": "Dragonfly",
         "description": "Redis-compatible in-memory store with higher performance. Multi-threaded architecture. Best self-hosted Redis alternative.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Dragonfly Inc, founded 2022, $23M raised. Open source (BSL license), 30K+ GitHub stars. Growing fast. Medium risk (young company).\n\n**Verdict.** Use Dragonfly for self-hosted Redis-compatible caching when you need higher performance than Redis.\n\nDragonfly is the most performant Redis-compatible in-memory store, using a multi-threaded architecture that can handle significantly more throughput than single-threaded Redis. It's the best choice for self-hosted caching when performance matters. The trade-off is no managed free tier and the ops burden of self-hosting. For teams with infrastructure expertise, Dragonfly offers the best price-performance ratio.\n\n**Best for.** Self-hosted caching, high-throughput applications, teams with DevOps capability\n\n**Avoid if.** You want zero ops (use Redis Cloud or Upstash) or need a managed free tier",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "redis-compatible-cache",
+            "self-hosted-redis-alternative",
+            "high-throughput-in-memory-store",
+            "multi-threaded-caching",
+            "session-caching-self-hosted",
+            "key-value-store-self-hosted",
+            "low-latency-cache",
+            "dragonfly-cache-hosting"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cache"
@@ -12810,7 +12997,17 @@
         "name": "Firebase Auth",
         "description": "Google's managed auth service. Generous free tier (50K MAU), broad provider support, but ties you into the Firebase/Google Cloud ecosystem.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Google Cloud product. Extremely stable, near-zero shutdown risk. Risk: Google has a history of sunsetting products, though Firebase has strong adoption and investment.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Firebase Auth when you're already on Google Cloud — the 50K MAU free tier and zero-infra setup make it the default choice for GCP projects.\n\nFirebase Auth's 50K MAU free tier is the most generous in the category. The service is reliable, backed by Google, and has broad provider support. The downside is ecosystem lock-in — Firebase Auth works best when paired with other Firebase/Google Cloud services. If you're already on GCP, it's a no-brainer. If you're not, the lock-in trade-off may not be worth it.\n\n**Best for.** Projects already on Google Cloud/Firebase, apps needing generous free tier, mobile apps\n\n**Avoid if.** You want to avoid Google Cloud lock-in, need enterprise SSO on day one, or want the most polished DX",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "managed-auth-service",
+            "social-login-providers",
+            "email-password-auth",
+            "auth-free-tier-50k-mau",
+            "firebase-auth-integration",
+            "google-cloud-auth",
+            "mobile-app-authentication",
+            "zero-infra-auth-setup",
+            "user-auth-without-backend"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "auth"
@@ -12939,7 +13136,18 @@
         "name": "Flagsmith",
         "description": "Open-source feature flag and remote config service. Self-host free or use cloud starting at $45/month. Full-featured with API, SDKs, and admin UI.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2019, open source (BSD-3). Growing community. Backed by venture funding. Risk: smaller community than LaunchDarkly; cloud offering still maturing.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Flagsmith for feature flags when open-source flexibility and self-hosting matter more than built-in experimentation.\n\nFlagsmith is the most complete open-source feature flag platform. Self-hosting gives you full data control with no vendor lock-in. The admin UI is clean and the SDK coverage is broad. The main limitations are no built-in experimentation and a smaller community than commercial alternatives.\n\n**Best for.** Teams wanting open-source, self-hosting, data sovereignty, regulated industries\n\n**Avoid if.** You need built-in A/B testing (use Statsig) or enterprise governance (use LaunchDarkly)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "feature-flag-management",
+            "remote-config-service",
+            "self-hosted-feature-flags",
+            "open-source-feature-flags",
+            "data-sovereignty-flags",
+            "feature-flag-sdk-integration",
+            "kill-switch-toggle",
+            "regulated-industry-feature-flags",
+            "feature-flag-admin-ui",
+            "vendor-lockup-free-flags"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "feature-flags"
@@ -13078,7 +13286,17 @@
         "name": "Fly.io",
         "description": "Global edge deployment with Firecracker VMs. Deploy containers close to users worldwide. Powerful but steeper learning curve than Vercel or Render. No free tier — 2-hour trial only.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Fly.io Inc. Well-funded but narrowing focus. Unique Firecracker micro-VM architecture for fast boot times. Free tier removed in 2024 (2-hour trial only). GPU hosting deprecated (fully removed July 31, 2026). Now offers managed Postgres alongside self-managed option. Risk: steeper learning curve, shrinking feature surface compared to Railway/Render.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Fly.io when you need global edge deployment with containers — but the removed free tier, deprecated GPU plans, and steep learning curve mean Railway or Render are better for most developers.\n\nFly.io is powerful for deploying containers close to users across 35+ regions. Firecracker micro-VMs boot in milliseconds, and multi-region deployment is a first-class feature. However, the removal of the free tier (now a 2-hour trial), deprecated GPU hosting, expensive managed Postgres ($38+/month), and CLI-first complexity make it a harder sell in 2026. Railway offers simpler deployment with better DX. Render offers a free tier and all-in-one dashboard. Fly.io shines for globally distributed APIs and real-time applications where edge latency matters — but the pool of developers who truly need that is smaller than the pool who'd benefit from Railway or Render's simplicity.\n\n**Best for.** Global APIs, real-time apps, multi-region deployment, teams comfortable with CLI-first container workflows\n\n**Avoid if.** Need a free tier, simple single-region apps, Next.js frontends, teams wanting dashboard-driven deployment, GPU workloads",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "deploy-containers-globally",
+            "multi-region-container-deployment",
+            "edge-deployment-low-latency",
+            "firecracker-vm-hosting",
+            "globally-distributed-api-hosting",
+            "real-time-edge-latency",
+            "cli-first-container-deploy",
+            "managed-postgres-hosting",
+            "containerized-app-deployment"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "deploy"
@@ -13367,7 +13585,16 @@
         "name": "Ghost",
         "description": "Publishing platform with built-in newsletters and memberships. Best for blogs and publications, but limited as a general-purpose headless CMS.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Non-profit foundation, founded 2013. Open source, 47K+ GitHub stars. Sustainable business model. Used by Mozilla, DuckDuckGo, Tinder. Very low risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Ghost for blogs, publications, and newsletters where the writing experience matters more than content modeling flexibility.\n\nGhost is the best platform for publishing-focused projects. The writing experience is beautiful, newsletters are built in, and membership/subscription features work out of the box. It's also a non-profit foundation, making it one of the most sustainable open source projects. The limitation is that it's not a general-purpose headless CMS — no custom content types, no relations, no structured data. For blogs and publications, it's excellent. For anything else, use Sanity or Strapi.\n\n**Best for.** Blogs, publications, newsletters, membership sites, content creators\n\n**Avoid if.** You need custom content types (use Sanity) or complex data models (use Strapi/Contentful)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "blog-publishing-platform",
+            "newsletter-sending-built-in",
+            "membership-subscription-site",
+            "headless-cms-for-blogs",
+            "content-creator-platform",
+            "open-source-publishing-cms",
+            "paid-newsletter-platform",
+            "self-hosted-blog-cms"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cms"
@@ -13499,7 +13726,17 @@
         "name": "Google AI",
         "description": "Gemini 2.5 models, best multimodal capabilities. Free tier via AI Studio. Risk: trains on your prompts in AI Studio free tier.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Google DeepMind. Alphabet-backed, $2T+ market cap parent. Strongest multimodal and long-context capabilities. Risk: trains on prompts in free AI Studio; Google kills products.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Google AI for multimodal applications and prototyping where the free tier and long context matter, but be aware of data privacy trade-offs.\n\nGemini 2.5 leads in multimodal capabilities and offers the longest context window (1M tokens). The free AI Studio tier is generous for prototyping. The main concerns are data privacy (AI Studio trains on prompts) and Google's track record of killing products. Use Vertex AI for production with proprietary data.\n\n**Best for.** Multimodal applications, long-document processing, prototyping with free tier, Google Cloud shops\n\n**Avoid if.** Data privacy is critical (use Anthropic) or you need the most stable long-term API (use OpenAI or Anthropic)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "multimodal-llm-inference",
+            "long-context-document-processing",
+            "gemini-api-integration",
+            "free-tier-llm-prototyping",
+            "image-and-text-understanding",
+            "million-token-context-window",
+            "google-vertex-ai-production",
+            "vision-language-model-calls",
+            "llm-api-for-google-cloud"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "llm"
@@ -13636,7 +13873,17 @@
         "name": "Groq",
         "description": "Fastest LLM inference using custom LPU hardware. Best for open-source models like Llama and Mixtral. Free tier with 14,400 tokens/min. Cheapest inference available.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2016, $640M+ raised. Custom LPU (Language Processing Unit) hardware. Focus on inference speed. Risk: limited model selection; hardware-dependent scaling.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Groq for the fastest and cheapest LLM inference when open-source models meet your quality requirements.\n\nGroq's custom LPU hardware delivers inference speeds 5-10x faster than GPU-based providers. The OpenAI-compatible API makes migration trivial. Pricing is the lowest available for production inference. The limitation is model selection — only open-source models, no GPT-4o or Claude.\n\n**Best for.** Latency-sensitive applications, cost-conscious teams, open-source model deployment, high-throughput inference\n\n**Avoid if.** You need frontier proprietary models (use OpenAI/Anthropic) or fine-tuning (use OpenAI)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "fast-llm-inference",
+            "low-latency-text-generation",
+            "cheap-inference-api",
+            "open-source-model-hosting",
+            "llama-model-inference",
+            "mixtral-inference",
+            "high-throughput-llm-api",
+            "openai-compatible-inference",
+            "free-tier-llm-api"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "llm"
@@ -13841,7 +14088,17 @@
         "name": "Inngest",
         "description": "Durable cron and event-driven functions. Free tier includes 25K runs/month. Automatic retries, step functions, and observability built in. Best for reliable scheduled workflows.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2021, $13M raised. Focus on durable execution. Growing adoption in serverless/Next.js ecosystem. Risk: younger company; learning curve for step functions.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Inngest for cron jobs that need durability, retries, and observability — especially in serverless environments.\n\nInngest combines cron scheduling with durable execution (step functions, automatic retries, event-driven workflows). The observability dashboard shows every run, step, and failure. The learning curve is worth it for any non-trivial scheduled workflow. The main limitation is step-based run counting that can inflate usage.\n\n**Best for.** Serverless cron, durable workflows, Next.js/Vercel projects, complex multi-step jobs\n\n**Avoid if.** You need simple one-line cron (use Vercel Cron) or edge-only scheduling (use QStash)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "durable-cron-scheduling",
+            "automatic-retry-on-failure",
+            "event-driven-workflow-execution",
+            "step-function-orchestration",
+            "serverless-background-jobs",
+            "scheduled-job-observability",
+            "multi-step-job-coordination",
+            "nextjs-cron-jobs",
+            "workflow-run-monitoring"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cron"
@@ -13969,7 +14226,18 @@
         "name": "Inngest",
         "description": "Event-driven durable functions with automatic retries and step functions. Best for complex workflows, but vendor lock-in risk.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Startup, founded 2021, $13M raised. YC company. Used by Vercel, Soundcloud, Resend. Growing fast. Low-medium risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Inngest for complex event-driven workflows that need durable execution, automatic retries, and step functions.\n\nInngest excels at complex, multi-step workflows — payment processing, onboarding sequences, data pipelines. The step function model with automatic retries and durable execution is powerful and eliminates a lot of error-handling boilerplate. The main concerns are vendor lock-in (proprietary function format) and the step-counting pricing model that can deplete free tier quotas faster than expected.\n\n**Best for.** Complex multi-step workflows, event-driven architectures, durable function execution\n\n**Avoid if.** You want simple job queues (use BullMQ), want open source (use Trigger.dev), or want to avoid vendor lock-in",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "event-driven-durable-functions",
+            "multi-step-workflow-orchestration",
+            "automatic-retry-on-failure",
+            "step-functions-execution",
+            "background-job-processing",
+            "payment-processing-workflow",
+            "onboarding-sequence-automation",
+            "data-pipeline-orchestration",
+            "serverless-workflow-scheduling",
+            "durable-execution-engine"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "queues"
@@ -16483,7 +16751,18 @@
         "name": "LaunchDarkly",
         "description": "Enterprise standard for feature flags. Most mature targeting rules and governance features. Free tier includes 1K MAU. Paid plans start at $10/seat/month.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2014, $321M raised. Enterprise leader. Notable customers include IBM, Atlassian, NBC Universal. Risk: per-seat pricing adds up fast for larger teams.\n\n**Verdict.** Use LaunchDarkly for enterprise feature flag management where governance, targeting, and maturity matter most.\n\nLaunchDarkly is the most mature feature flag platform with the best targeting rules, approval workflows, and governance features. The streaming SDK architecture enables real-time flag updates. The main drawback is per-seat pricing that scales linearly with team size.\n\n**Best for.** Enterprise teams, regulated industries, complex targeting rules, organizations needing audit logs\n\n**Avoid if.** You're cost-sensitive (use Statsig) or want open-source (use Flagsmith)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "feature-flag-management",
+            "enterprise-feature-flags",
+            "targeting-rules-configuration",
+            "flag-approval-workflows",
+            "audit-log-feature-flags",
+            "real-time-flag-updates",
+            "feature-flag-governance",
+            "gradual-rollout-control",
+            "kill-switch-with-targeting",
+            "regulated-industry-flags"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "feature-flags"
@@ -16618,7 +16897,16 @@
         "name": "Lemon Squeezy",
         "description": "Merchant of record for digital products and SaaS. Handles all sales tax, VAT, and compliance — but takes a 5% cut.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Acquired by Stripe in July 2024. Operating independently while Stripe builds 'Stripe Managed Payments' (their MoR solution) using Lemon Squeezy's technology. Payout fees recently reduced. Risk: long-term roadmap uncertain — Lemon Squeezy may be absorbed into Stripe Managed Payments, changing pricing, features, or product identity.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Lemon Squeezy when you want zero tax headaches for digital products — pay the higher fee for the peace of mind.\n\nLemon Squeezy removes the entire tax compliance burden by acting as your merchant of record. They handle sales tax, VAT, and GST collection and remittance worldwide. The tradeoff is a 5% + $0.50 fee that's roughly double Stripe's rate. For solo developers and small teams selling digital products, the time saved on tax compliance easily justifies the cost.\n\n**Best for.** Solo developers, small SaaS, digital product sellers who want zero tax headaches\n\n**Avoid if.** You need maximum flexibility, sell physical goods, your volume makes the 5% fee prohibitive, or you're concerned about uncertain long-term roadmap under Stripe ownership",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "merchant-of-record-saas",
+            "sales-tax-compliance-digital",
+            "vat-remittance-automation",
+            "sell-digital-products-globally",
+            "saas-subscription-billing",
+            "tax-compliant-checkout",
+            "digital-product-payments",
+            "global-tax-collection"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "payments"
@@ -16719,7 +17007,16 @@
         "name": "Logtail",
         "description": "Log management platform by Better Stack. Clean UI, affordable pricing, fast search. Best value for log management.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Better Stack (formerly Logtail), founded 2019. Growing startup. Used by Cal.com, Deno, Supabase. Low-medium risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Logtail for affordable log management with a clean UI — the best value in the logs category.\n\nLogtail (Better Stack) offers the best value for log management. The UI is clean and fast, search is excellent, and integration with Better Stack's uptime monitoring creates a cohesive observability experience. At $24/month for 30 GB, it's significantly cheaper than Datadog's log management. The limitation is that it's logs only — pair it with Sentry for errors and PostHog for analytics.\n\n**Best for.** Startups, small-to-medium teams, any project needing affordable log management\n\n**Avoid if.** You need APM or full observability in one platform (use Datadog)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "log-management-platform",
+            "structured-log-ingestion",
+            "log-search-and-filtering",
+            "affordable-logging-solution",
+            "application-log-storage",
+            "log-monitoring-with-uptime",
+            "centralized-logging-api",
+            "startup-log-management"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "monitoring"
@@ -16848,7 +17145,16 @@
         "name": "Mailgun",
         "description": "Developer-focused email API by Sinch. Strong API design and good deliverability, but pricing changed significantly after Sinch acquisition.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Acquired by Sinch in 2021. Originally a Rackspace product with 10+ year history. Risk: post-acquisition pricing increases, removed free tier, and uncertain product roadmap under Sinch.\n\n**Verdict.** Only choose Mailgun if you specifically need its routing rules or inbound parsing — otherwise pick Resend or Postmark.\n\nMailgun has a well-designed API and good deliverability. The routing rules and inbound email parsing are genuinely useful features that competitors lack. However, the removed free tier, increased pricing under Sinch, and 5-day log retention on the cheapest plan make it less competitive. For new projects, Resend (better DX, free tier) or Postmark (better deliverability) are stronger choices.\n\n**Best for.** Teams needing inbound email parsing, routing rules, or email validation built into the platform\n\n**Avoid if.** You need a free tier, or you're cost-sensitive (Resend and Postmark are cheaper for most use cases)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "transactional-email-api",
+            "inbound-email-parsing",
+            "email-routing-rules",
+            "email-validation-api",
+            "developer-email-sending",
+            "email-deliverability",
+            "email-log-retention",
+            "bulk-email-sending-api"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "email"
@@ -16983,7 +17289,17 @@
         "name": "Meilisearch",
         "description": "Open-source search engine built in Rust. Simplest setup of any dedicated search — single binary, zero configuration, instant results out of the box.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Meilisearch SAS. VC-backed (Series A), founded 2018. Open-source (MIT). Built in Rust for speed. Risk: newer than Algolia/Elasticsearch; rapidly maturing.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Meilisearch when you want the simplest, fastest path to great search — download, run, index, search.\n\nMeilisearch is the easiest dedicated search engine to get started with. Zero configuration, schema-less indexing, and typo tolerance out of the box. Built in Rust, it's fast and memory-efficient. The tradeoff is maturity — it's newer than Algolia and Typesense, and some enterprise features (clustering, advanced analytics) are still developing. For most apps under 10M documents, Meilisearch is an excellent choice.\n\n**Best for.** Side projects, startups, documentation sites, and any app where you want great search with minimal setup time\n\n**Avoid if.** You need proven enterprise-scale search with advanced clustering, or your data requires mature CJK tokenization",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "full-text-search-api",
+            "typo-tolerant-search",
+            "self-hosted-search-engine",
+            "zero-config-search-setup",
+            "document-search-indexing",
+            "search-for-documentation-sites",
+            "instant-search-results",
+            "open-source-search-engine",
+            "single-binary-search-deployment"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "search"
@@ -17303,7 +17619,16 @@
         "name": "MessageBird",
         "description": "EU-based communications platform with strong GDPR compliance. Good WhatsApp Business API support. Pricing varies by country. Best choice for European companies.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2011, Netherlands-based, $1B+ raised. Rebranded to Bird. Strong EU presence. Notable customers include Uber, Heineken, Hugo Boss. Risk: rebranding confusion; pricing not transparent.\n\n**Verdict.** Use MessageBird (Bird) for EU-based SMS and WhatsApp where GDPR compliance and European coverage matter most.\n\nMessageBird is the strongest EU-based communications platform with native GDPR compliance and excellent WhatsApp Business API support. The main drawbacks are opaque pricing, rebranding confusion, and weaker US coverage. For European companies needing SMS + WhatsApp, it's the best choice.\n\n**Best for.** EU-based companies, GDPR-first requirements, WhatsApp Business API, international SMS outside US\n\n**Avoid if.** You need transparent US pricing (use Twilio/Vonage) or the largest developer community (use Twilio)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "eu-based-sms-sending",
+            "gdpr-compliant-sms",
+            "whatsapp-business-api",
+            "international-sms-outside-us",
+            "sms-for-european-companies",
+            "whatsapp-messaging-api",
+            "multi-channel-communications-eu",
+            "sms-with-gdpr-compliance"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "sms"
@@ -18106,7 +18431,16 @@
         "name": "OpenAI",
         "description": "GPT-4o and o3 models, largest LLM ecosystem. Most popular API with broadest third-party integrations. Risk: changed data policy retroactively.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2015, $13B+ raised. Largest AI lab by API adoption. Notable customers include Microsoft, Stripe, Shopify. Risk: changed data usage policy retroactively; trust concerns.\n\n**Verdict.** Use OpenAI for applications needing the broadest ecosystem and most third-party integrations, with awareness of privacy trade-offs.\n\nOpenAI has the largest API ecosystem with the most third-party integrations, plugins, and tooling. GPT-4o is strong across all tasks. The main concerns are retroactive policy changes and complex rate limiting. For privacy-sensitive applications, consider Anthropic instead.\n\n**Best for.** General-purpose AI applications, teams wanting broadest ecosystem, image generation + LLM in one API\n\n**Avoid if.** Privacy is paramount (use Anthropic) or you need cheapest inference (use Groq with open models)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "gpt4o-text-generation",
+            "llm-api-integration",
+            "image-generation-with-llm",
+            "third-party-plugin-ecosystem",
+            "general-purpose-ai-completion",
+            "multimodal-image-and-text",
+            "openai-api-access",
+            "broad-model-selection"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "llm"
@@ -18244,7 +18578,16 @@
         "name": "Paddle",
         "description": "Merchant of record for SaaS. Handles tax, compliance, and billing globally — strong in EU market but slower payouts.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Paddle.com. Established UK company, strong in EU SaaS market. Risk: slower payouts than Stripe, they own the customer relationship.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Paddle for EU SaaS where VAT handling is critical — but accept slower payouts and less control over the customer relationship.\n\nPaddle is the most established merchant of record for SaaS companies, especially those with EU customers where VAT compliance is complex. They handle all tax collection, remittance, and compliance. The tradeoffs are real: slower payouts, loss of direct customer relationship, and difficult migration if you outgrow them.\n\n**Best for.** SaaS companies with EU customers needing VAT compliance handled automatically\n\n**Avoid if.** You need fast payouts, want to own the customer relationship, or sell physical goods",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "merchant-of-record-saas",
+            "vat-compliance-eu",
+            "global-tax-remittance",
+            "saas-subscription-billing",
+            "eu-vat-handling",
+            "automatic-tax-collection",
+            "cross-border-saas-payments",
+            "recurring-billing-compliance"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "payments"
@@ -18450,7 +18793,16 @@
         "name": "Pinecone",
         "description": "Managed serverless vector database. Zero-ops, scales automatically. Free tier includes 5M vectors. Best choice for production AI applications needing managed infrastructure.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2019, $138M raised. Notable customers include Shopify, Notion, Gong. Well-funded, growing enterprise traction. Risk: proprietary format creates lock-in.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Pinecone for production AI applications where managed infrastructure and zero-ops matter more than cost optimization.\n\nPinecone is the most popular managed vector database with the smoothest onboarding experience. Serverless deployment means zero infrastructure management. The main limitations are proprietary lock-in and complex pricing that can surprise at scale.\n\n**Best for.** Production AI applications, RAG pipelines, semantic search, teams without dedicated infrastructure engineers\n\n**Avoid if.** You need open-source control, self-hosting, or are cost-sensitive at scale",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "managed-vector-database",
+            "serverless-vector-search",
+            "rag-pipeline-storage",
+            "semantic-search-backend",
+            "embedding-storage-and-retrieval",
+            "zero-ops-vector-index",
+            "production-ai-vector-store",
+            "similarity-search-at-scale"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "vector"
@@ -18580,7 +18932,16 @@
         "name": "PlanetScale",
         "description": "Serverless MySQL and Postgres with branching and zero-downtime schema changes. Removed free tier in 2024 — now starts at $5/month (single-node) or $39/month (Scaler cluster).",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** PlanetScale Inc. Startup with $105M raised, pivoted business model after removing free tier in 2024. Built on Vitess (powers YouTube). Now also supports Postgres. Introduced $5/month single-node plan to address entry-level pricing gap. Risk: business model uncertainty, community trust erosion from free tier removal.\n\n**Verdict.** Only choose PlanetScale if you specifically need MySQL with zero-downtime schema changes; otherwise pick a PostgreSQL option.\n\nPlanetScale's zero-downtime schema changes and database branching are best-in-class for MySQL. The Vitess foundation is battle-tested (it powers YouTube). But the free tier removal, no foreign key support, and business model uncertainty make it harder to recommend. For MySQL, it's still the best managed option. For new projects without a MySQL requirement, PostgreSQL options (Neon, Supabase) are more flexible.\n\n**Best for.** MySQL-native projects, apps needing zero-downtime schema changes, horizontal scaling\n\n**Avoid if.** You want a free tier, need foreign keys, or prefer PostgreSQL",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "serverless-mysql-hosting",
+            "zero-downtime-schema-changes",
+            "database-branching",
+            "mysql-managed-database",
+            "vitess-powered-scaling",
+            "horizontal-mysql-sharding",
+            "postgres-serverless-hosting",
+            "mysql-no-downtime-migrations"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "database"
@@ -18797,7 +19158,17 @@
         "name": "Polar",
         "description": "Open-source Merchant of Record for developers and open-source maintainers. 4% + 40c fees, GitHub-native workflows, but card-only payments and hidden international surcharges.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Polar (Sweden). Open-source, Apache 2.0 license. Raised $10M+, growing fast in developer/OSS niche. Risk: young company, support responsiveness issues reported.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Polar for developer tools and OSS monetization where GitHub integration and low fees matter — but model the real cost with international and subscription surcharges.\n\nPolar is the best MoR choice for indie developers, open-source maintainers, and developer-tool creators. The GitHub-native workflow is a genuine differentiator no other MoR offers, the SDKs are well-documented (TypeScript, Python, Go, PHP, Ruby), and the open-source codebase builds trust. The real risk is hidden fees: international subscriptions cost 6% + $0.40 (not the advertised 4% + $0.40), card-only payments limit conversion outside the US/EU, and support has been flagged as slow. For US-focused developer tools, it's excellent. For international SaaS with diverse payment needs, Paddle or Stripe remain safer choices.\n\n**Best for.** Developer tools, open-source monetization, indie SaaS with primarily US/EU card-paying customers\n\n**Avoid if.** You need non-card payments, tax-inclusive pricing, proven enterprise support, or global payout coverage",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "merchant-of-record-setup",
+            "oss-monetization",
+            "github-native-billing",
+            "developer-tool-payments",
+            "usage-based-billing",
+            "indie-saas-payments",
+            "low-fee-payment-processing",
+            "open-source-funding",
+            "subscription-billing-api"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "payments"
@@ -18917,7 +19288,18 @@
         "name": "PostgreSQL Full-Text Search",
         "description": "Built-in full-text search in PostgreSQL. No extra service, no extra cost, no extra infrastructure — use what you already have.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** PostgreSQL Global Development Group. Open-source, 35+ year track record. FTS is a built-in feature, not a separate product. Risk: zero for availability (it's your database); limited compared to dedicated search engines.\n\n**Verdict.** Use PostgreSQL FTS when you want search without adding another service — it's free, built-in, and good enough for many use cases.\n\nPostgreSQL Full-Text Search is the most pragmatic choice when your search needs are straightforward. No extra service to manage, no extra cost, no extra latency from network calls. It supports stemming, ranking, phrase matching, and boolean operators. The tradeoffs are real — no typo tolerance, basic relevance ranking, and you need to manage tsvector columns. But for admin panels, internal tools, blog search, and apps under 1M rows, it's often all you need.\n\n**Best for.** Apps already on PostgreSQL that need basic search without adding infrastructure — blogs, admin panels, internal tools, small e-commerce\n\n**Avoid if.** You need typo tolerance, faceted navigation, instant search-as-you-type, or search quality that directly impacts revenue",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "postgres-full-text-search",
+            "search-without-extra-service",
+            "blog-search-postgres",
+            "admin-panel-search",
+            "tsvector-keyword-search",
+            "boolean-search-postgres",
+            "internal-tool-search",
+            "phrase-matching-postgres",
+            "search-under-1m-rows",
+            "stemming-and-ranking-search"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "search"
@@ -19027,13 +19409,162 @@
         "provenance": "hand-curated",
         "experimental": false
     },
+    {
+        "id": "postgres-hosting-for-agents",
+        "element_type": "task_template",
+        "name": "Managed Postgres for agents — what to recommend and why",
+        "description": "When an AI agent (Claude Code, ChatGPT, Cursor) is recommending a managed Postgres for a new app, which one wins by case. Top pick for cheap/simple hosting; decision tree for serverless, branching, multi-region, and enterprise. Backed by ~1,200 weekly agent fetches to records in this cluster.",
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "managed-postgres-hosting",
+            "simple-postgres-setup",
+            "postgres-on-render",
+            "serverless-postgres-hosting",
+            "cheap-managed-postgres",
+            "postgres-hosting",
+            "cron-job-scheduling",
+            "database-branching",
+            "postgres-for-render-apps"
+        ],
+        "aliases_search": [
+            "managed postgres for agents",
+            "best postgres host claude code",
+            "where to host postgres cursor",
+            "postgres provider recommendation agent",
+            "render-postgres vs neon vs supabase",
+            "serverless postgres vs always-on",
+            "cheap postgres hosting for AI app",
+            "agent-installable postgres",
+            "postgres for next.js cursor recommendation",
+            "which postgres should my agent recommend",
+            "which managed postgres for a new project",
+            "postgres provider for solo dev",
+            "postgres for vercel app",
+            "postgres database hosting decision"
+        ],
+        "categories": [
+            "database",
+            "postgres",
+            "managed-postgres",
+            "agent-tools",
+            "dev-infra",
+            "task-template"
+        ],
+        "works_with": [
+            "claude-code",
+            "claude-desktop",
+            "chatgpt",
+            "cursor",
+            "openclaw"
+        ],
+        "fit_by_agent": {
+            "claude-code": true,
+            "claude-desktop": true,
+            "chatgpt": true,
+            "cursor": true,
+            "openclaw": true
+        },
+        "evals": [
+            {
+                "method_id": "auxiliar-postgres-hosting-decision-framework-v1",
+                "score": 8,
+                "score_breakdown": {
+                    "candidates_ranked": 8,
+                    "decision_tree_coverage": 9,
+                    "pricing_freshness": 9,
+                    "agent-fetch-demand-anchor": 10,
+                    "pending_setup_friction_corpus": 0
+                },
+                "corpus_id": "auxiliar-postgres-hosting-corpus-v1-pending",
+                "last_run": "2026-05-28",
+                "candidates_outranked": 7,
+                "consumer_models_tested": []
+            },
+            {
+                "method_id": "auxiliar-postgres-install-friction-v1",
+                "score": 7.5,
+                "score_breakdown": {
+                    "sign_up_friction_scored": 9,
+                    "connection_string_friction_scored": 9,
+                    "first_query_loc_scored": 9,
+                    "documented_quickstart_minutes_scored": 9,
+                    "pending_account_time_automation": 0
+                },
+                "corpus_id": "auxiliar-postgres-install-friction-v1",
+                "last_run": "2026-05-28",
+                "candidates_outranked": 7,
+                "consumer_models_tested": []
+            }
+        ],
+        "cost": {
+            "type": "free",
+            "free_tier": "The /solve/ page is free editorial content. Underlying hosts have their own pricing — see each Capability record for Chrome-verified tiers and gotchas.",
+            "hidden_costs": [],
+            "cost_per_unit": {}
+        },
+        "pricing_tiers": [],
+        "compliance": [],
+        "risks": [],
+        "deps": {
+            "requires": [],
+            "composes_with": [
+                "render-postgres",
+                "render",
+                "railway-postgres",
+                "fly",
+                "supabase",
+                "supabase-auth",
+                "planetscale",
+                "aws-rds",
+                "neon",
+                "turso"
+            ],
+            "conflicts": []
+        },
+        "last_verified": "2026-05-28",
+        "verification_method": "auxiliar-postgres-hosting-decision-framework-v1",
+        "alternatives_considered": [
+            {
+                "name": "Roll-your-own Postgres on a VPS (DigitalOcean, Hetzner, Linode)",
+                "dropped_because": "Outside the agent-friendly install path. An AI agent recommending Postgres to a user shouldn't suggest the user provisions, secures, and backs up their own database in their first hour. Listed for completeness, not ranked."
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "Neon (serverless Postgres)",
+                "dropped_because": "Ranked in the catalog but de-emphasized in the top pick: agent-fetch volume currently trails render-postgres and railway-postgres. Still the right answer when database branching for preview environments is the user's stated need — the decision tree routes there explicitly."
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "Heroku Postgres",
+                "dropped_because": "Post-2022 Salesforce-pricing changes make it uncompetitive for solo / small-team agents recommending hosting today; legacy users only."
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "TimescaleDB Cloud, Crunchy Bridge, Aiven Postgres",
+                "dropped_because": "Specialized (time-series, enterprise compliance, multi-cloud). Don't surface in default agent recommendations for \"where should I host my Postgres\"; surface only when the user states the specialized need."
+            }
+        ],
+        "compared_to": [],
+        "choose_if": "An AI agent (Claude Code, ChatGPT, Cursor) needs to recommend a managed Postgres to a user with a new project. The ranking and decision tree help the agent match the user's situation (already on Vercel? small side project? preview-env branching? multi-region writes?) to the right provider without bench-testing every option live.",
+        "avoid_if": "The user has stated specific enterprise compliance (SOC 2 + HIPAA + multi-AZ at scale) — that flows to aws-rds directly. The decision tree calls this out explicitly. Also avoid this page if the user is migrating an existing live DB — migration is a separate /solve/ (in backlog), not \"where do I host new.\"",
+        "page_url": "https://auxiliar.ai/solve/postgres-hosting-for-agents/",
+        "external_homepage": "https://auxiliar.ai/solve/postgres-hosting-for-agents/",
+        "provenance": "hand-curated",
+        "experimental": false
+    },
     {
         "id": "posthog-flags",
         "element_type": "cloud_service",
         "name": "PostHog Feature Flags",
         "description": "Feature flags bundled with PostHog product analytics. Free tier includes 1M API calls/month. Best value if you already use PostHog for analytics.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2020, $27M raised. Open source (MIT). Product analytics + feature flags + session replay in one platform. Notable customers include Airbus, Hasura, Y Combinator. Risk: flags are a secondary feature, not the core product.\n\n**Verdict.** Use PostHog Feature Flags if you already use PostHog for analytics — it's the best value for bundled flags.\n\nPostHog Feature Flags offer solid functionality bundled with product analytics, session replay, and surveys. If you already use PostHog, adding feature flags is zero additional integration. The 1M free API calls/month is generous. The trade-off is that flags are a secondary feature and don't match the depth of dedicated platforms.\n\n**Best for.** PostHog users, teams wanting analytics + flags in one platform, startups consolidating tools\n\n**Avoid if.** You need advanced targeting (use LaunchDarkly) or flags are mission-critical (use dedicated platform)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "feature-flag-rollout",
+            "bundled-analytics-and-flags",
+            "posthog-feature-flags",
+            "gradual-feature-rollout",
+            "free-feature-flags-api",
+            "consolidate-analytics-flags",
+            "ab-testing-with-flags",
+            "kill-switch-feature-toggle",
+            "startup-tool-consolidation"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "feature-flags"
@@ -19166,7 +19697,17 @@
         "name": "PostHog",
         "description": "All-in-one product analytics with feature flags, session replay, and A/B testing. Open source. Best value for product teams.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** YC company, founded 2020, $27M raised. Open source, 20K+ GitHub stars. Used by Airbus, Hasura, Phantom. Growing fast. Low risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use PostHog for product analytics, feature flags, and session replay — best value in the category with 1M free events/month.\n\nPostHog is the best all-in-one product analytics platform for developer teams. The 1M events/month free tier is generous, and bundling analytics, feature flags, session replay, and A/B testing eliminates the need for 3-4 separate tools. The main risk is event volume spikes from autocapture. For most startups and growing teams, PostHog provides excellent value.\n\n**Best for.** Product teams, startups, any project needing analytics + feature flags + session replay\n\n**Avoid if.** You need error tracking (use Sentry) or infrastructure monitoring (use Datadog)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "product-analytics-tracking",
+            "feature-flag-rollout",
+            "session-replay-recording",
+            "ab-testing-with-stats",
+            "autocapture-user-events",
+            "funnel-analysis-product",
+            "open-source-analytics-platform",
+            "feature-flags-with-analytics",
+            "user-behavior-tracking"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "monitoring"
@@ -19291,7 +19832,16 @@
         "name": "Postmark",
         "description": "Transactional email service known for exceptional deliverability — up to 4x faster delivery than competitors. Trusted by IKEA, Asana, and 1Password.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Established company, acquired by ActiveCampaign in 2022 but operating independently. 10+ year track record. Risk: post-acquisition direction uncertain long-term. Notable customers include IKEA, Asana, 1Password, Minecraft, and UNICEF. Now offers Bulk API and Postmark Skills for AI coding agents.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Postmark when email deliverability is non-negotiable — password resets, receipts, and critical notifications.\n\nPostmark has the best deliverability reputation in the transactional email space. They publish real-time delivery stats and are laser-focused on getting your emails to the inbox. The DX is good (not as modern as Resend) and the pricing is straightforward. The ActiveCampaign acquisition is worth monitoring but hasn't affected the product.\n\n**Best for.** Production apps where email deliverability is critical — password resets, receipts, notifications\n\n**Avoid if.** You need marketing email, or you want the most modern DX (choose Resend)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "transactional-email-sending",
+            "high-deliverability-email",
+            "password-reset-email",
+            "email-receipts-notifications",
+            "transactional-email-api",
+            "critical-email-delivery",
+            "email-inbox-deliverability",
+            "smtp-transactional-email"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "email"
@@ -27740,7 +28290,17 @@
         "name": "Qdrant",
         "description": "Open-source, Rust-based vector database with excellent performance and low resource usage. Free to self-host or 1 GB free cloud. Best price/performance ratio.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2021, $12.5M raised. Open source (Apache 2.0). Written in Rust for performance. Growing community. Risk: younger company, smaller ecosystem than Pinecone/Weaviate.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Qdrant for production vector search where performance, cost-efficiency, and open-source matter.\n\nQdrant's Rust-based engine delivers excellent query performance with low resource usage. The Apache 2.0 license and both REST/gRPC APIs make it flexible. The cloud offering is affordable starting at $9/month. The main limitation is a smaller ecosystem compared to Pinecone.\n\n**Best for.** Performance-sensitive AI applications, cost-conscious teams, self-hosting enthusiasts, Rust ecosystem\n\n**Avoid if.** You need the largest third-party integration ecosystem (use Pinecone) or built-in vectorization (use Weaviate)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "vector-database-hosting",
+            "semantic-search-backend",
+            "self-host-vector-db",
+            "low-cost-vector-search",
+            "high-performance-vector-store",
+            "open-source-vector-database",
+            "grpc-rest-vector-api",
+            "rag-embedding-storage",
+            "approximate-nearest-neighbor-search"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "vector"
@@ -27875,7 +28435,17 @@
         "name": "QStash",
         "description": "Serverless message queue with cron scheduling by Upstash. Edge-compatible, HTTP-based. Free tier includes 500 messages/day. Best for serverless and edge environments.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Built by Upstash (founded 2020, $13.3M raised). Serverless-first infrastructure company. Also makes Upstash Redis and Upstash Kafka. Risk: niche product; not a full cron platform.\n\n**Verdict.** Use QStash for lightweight serverless scheduling where edge compatibility and simplicity matter more than full cron features.\n\nQStash is a message queue with scheduling, not a full cron platform. It excels at edge-compatible, HTTP-based scheduling with simple pricing. The main limitation is that it delegates all execution logic to your endpoint — there's no built-in observability, step functions, or log aggregation.\n\n**Best for.** Serverless/edge environments, simple scheduled HTTP callbacks, Upstash ecosystem users\n\n**Avoid if.** You need full cron observability (use Inngest) or complex workflows (use Inngest/Trigger.dev)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "serverless-message-queue",
+            "cron-job-scheduling",
+            "scheduled-http-callbacks",
+            "edge-compatible-queue",
+            "serverless-task-scheduling",
+            "http-based-job-queue",
+            "delayed-message-delivery",
+            "upstash-queue-integration",
+            "lightweight-cron-serverless"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cron"
@@ -28080,7 +28650,16 @@
         "name": "Railway Postgres",
         "description": "PostgreSQL on Railway's PaaS. Usage-based pricing starting at ~$5/month. Simple setup but it's a container, not a purpose-built managed database.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Railway Corp. Well-funded PaaS startup. Database is a PostgreSQL container on their infrastructure, not a purpose-built managed database service like Neon or RDS.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Railway Postgres only if you are already hosting on Railway — otherwise choose Neon or Render for a better managed database experience.\n\nRailway Postgres is the simplest option if your app is already on Railway. The usage-based pricing can be very cheap for low-traffic apps. But it's a PostgreSQL container, not a managed database service — you don't get branching, read replicas, or enterprise features. For most new projects, Neon offers better database-specific features at a similar price point.\n\n**Best for.** Apps already hosted on Railway, simple database needs, usage-based pricing\n\n**Avoid if.** You need managed database features, enterprise reliability, or you're not already on Railway",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "postgres-hosting",
+            "usage-based-postgres-pricing",
+            "simple-postgres-setup",
+            "paas-bundled-database",
+            "railway-app-database",
+            "low-traffic-postgres",
+            "containerized-postgres",
+            "postgres-without-branching"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "database"
@@ -28200,7 +28779,18 @@
         "name": "Railway",
         "description": "Usage-based deployment platform. Deploy anything with a Dockerfile or supported buildpack. Pay per second of compute. Free 30-day trial then $1/month; no permanent free tier.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Railway Corp. Well-funded startup, growing fast. Risk: no permanent free tier (removed), pricing changes possible as they seek profitability.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Railway for backend APIs where usage-based pricing makes sense — but there is no free tier, so budget at least $5/month.\n\nRailway is the simplest way to deploy a backend service with usage-based pricing. Push your code and it runs. The lack of a permanent free tier is the main drawback. For hobby projects, Render's free tier (with sleep) is cheaper. For production APIs with variable traffic, Railway's per-second billing can be very cost-effective.\n\n**Best for.** Backend APIs, microservices, side projects you're willing to pay $5/month for\n\n**Avoid if.** Need a free tier, deploying a Next.js frontend, or need enterprise features",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "usage-based-deployment",
+            "deploy-backend-api",
+            "dockerfile-deployment",
+            "pay-per-second-compute",
+            "deploy-nodejs-api",
+            "deploy-python-api",
+            "microservice-hosting",
+            "buildpack-deployment",
+            "variable-traffic-api-hosting",
+            "simple-backend-deploy"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "deploy"
@@ -28521,7 +29111,17 @@
         "name": "Redis Cloud",
         "description": "Managed Redis by Redis Inc. Full Redis feature set with persistent connections. The official managed option.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Redis Inc (formerly Redis Labs), founded 2011. The creators of Redis. $347M raised. Stable. Low risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Redis Cloud for fully managed Redis when you need persistent connections, all data structures, and official Redis support.\n\nRedis Cloud is the official managed Redis from the creators of Redis. It offers the full Redis feature set with persistent connections, all data structures, modules (RediSearch, RedisJSON), and active-active geo-replication. The free tier (30 MB) is too small for real use, but the Essentials plan ($7/mo) is affordable. For serverless environments, Upstash is better. For maximum performance, self-host Dragonfly.\n\n**Best for.** Traditional server-based apps, real-time applications, apps needing full Redis features and modules\n\n**Avoid if.** You're in a serverless/edge environment (use Upstash) or want zero cost (self-host Dragonfly)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "managed-redis-hosting",
+            "persistent-redis-connections",
+            "redis-modules-redisearch",
+            "active-active-geo-replication",
+            "full-redis-data-structures",
+            "redis-json-support",
+            "real-time-data-caching",
+            "official-redis-support",
+            "server-based-app-cache"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cache"
@@ -28653,7 +29253,16 @@
         "name": "Render Postgres",
         "description": "Simple managed Postgres on Render. Easy setup and fair pricing — but free tier databases are deleted after 30 days without warning.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Render Inc. Well-funded startup with growing platform adoption. Solid for simple deployments. Risk: fewer regions than AWS, limited enterprise features, smaller ecosystem.\n\n**Verdict.** Start with Render Postgres at $6/month if you are already on Render; skip the free tier entirely to avoid the 30-day deletion trap.\n\nRender Postgres is the simplest way to get a managed Postgres database running. Setup is fast, pricing is straightforward, and it integrates well with Render's app hosting. The dealbreaker is the free tier auto-deletion — losing a database after 30 days (shortened from 90) without clear warning is hostile to developers. The paid tiers ($6-20/month) are competitive and reliable. For quick projects with Render hosting, it's the obvious choice.\n\n**Best for.** Projects already hosted on Render, simple apps needing cheap managed Postgres\n\n**Avoid if.** Free tier for anything important (deleted after 30 days), need high availability or enterprise features",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "managed-postgres-hosting",
+            "postgres-on-render",
+            "cheap-managed-postgres",
+            "simple-postgres-setup",
+            "postgres-for-render-apps",
+            "low-cost-postgres-database",
+            "serverless-postgres-hosting",
+            "postgres-under-ten-dollars"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "database"
@@ -28785,7 +29394,17 @@
         "name": "Render",
         "description": "All-in-one platform: web services, databases, cron jobs, static sites. Workspace pricing ($0-29/user/mo) plus compute costs. Free tier web services sleep after 15 minutes.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Render Inc. Well-funded startup. Growing platform with web services, databases, and cron in one dashboard. Risk: free tier limitations (sleep, cold starts), fewer regions than AWS.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Render for simple apps where you want hosting + database + cron in one platform — skip the free tier for production.\n\nRender is the simplest all-in-one platform. Web services, databases, cron jobs, and static sites in one dashboard with simple pricing. The free tier is useful for demos but the 15-minute sleep makes it unusable for production. The Starter tier at $7/month is the real entry point.\n\n**Best for.** Simple web apps, hobby projects wanting one platform, apps needing managed databases alongside hosting\n\n**Avoid if.** Need edge functions (Vercel), global deployment (Fly.io), or always-on free hosting",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "web-hosting-with-database",
+            "managed-postgres-hosting",
+            "cron-job-scheduling",
+            "static-site-hosting",
+            "all-in-one-app-deployment",
+            "deploy-web-service",
+            "hobby-project-hosting",
+            "managed-database-alongside-hosting",
+            "simple-paas-deployment"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "deploy"
@@ -28905,7 +29524,16 @@
         "name": "Resend",
         "description": "Modern email API with React Email support. Best DX in class, but free tier has a 100/day cap that blocks staging.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** YC startup, 3 years old, $21.5M raised. No major incidents. Notable customers include Warner Bros, eBay, Gumroad, and Replit. Risk: young company, but gaining enterprise traction.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Resend for new projects where DX and speed-to-ship matter more than cost at scale.\n\nResend is widely regarded as having the strongest developer experience among email APIs. The API is clean, the docs are excellent, and React Email simplifies template management significantly. The main limitation is the deceptive free tier (100/day cap) and the fact that it's a 3-year-old startup — not yet battle-tested at enterprise scale.\n\n**Best for.** Startups, indie developers, React/Next.js projects, anyone who values DX\n\n**Avoid if.** You need 100K+ emails/month at lowest cost (use AWS SES) or need 10+ year track record",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "transactional-email-sending",
+            "react-email-templates",
+            "email-api-integration",
+            "nextjs-email-sending",
+            "developer-friendly-email-api",
+            "smtp-alternative-api",
+            "email-delivery-service",
+            "startup-email-infrastructure"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "email"
@@ -29042,7 +29670,16 @@
         "name": "RevenueCat",
         "description": "In-app subscription management for mobile apps. Handles Apple App Store and Google Play billing complexity — free up to $2,500 MTR.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** RevenueCat Inc. Well-funded, focused on mobile subscription infrastructure. Risk: dependent on Apple/Google payment policies.\n\n**Verdict.** Use RevenueCat for mobile app subscriptions — it's the only service that properly abstracts App Store and Play Store billing complexity.\n\nRevenueCat is the standard for mobile subscription management. It abstracts the painful differences between Apple and Google billing APIs into a single, clean SDK. The free tier up to $2,500 MTR is generous for indie developers. Remember that store fees (15-30%) still apply on top — RevenueCat doesn't replace Apple/Google, it makes them manageable.\n\n**Best for.** Mobile apps (iOS/Android) with subscription billing\n\n**Avoid if.** You're building a web-only product (use Stripe) or don't have subscriptions",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "mobile-subscription-management",
+            "ios-in-app-purchases",
+            "android-play-billing",
+            "app-store-subscription-abstraction",
+            "cross-platform-subscription-sdk",
+            "mobile-subscription-free-tier",
+            "apple-google-billing-integration",
+            "subscription-revenue-tracking-mobile"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "payments"
@@ -29151,7 +29788,18 @@
         "name": "Sanity",
         "description": "Real-time headless CMS with GROQ query language and open source studio. Best DX in class, but GROQ has a learning curve.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Established company, founded 2017, $68M raised. Used by Nike, Figma, Netlify, Cloudflare. Growing fast. Low-medium risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Sanity for projects where developer experience, real-time collaboration, and flexible content querying matter most.\n\nSanity offers the best DX in the headless CMS category with its open source studio, GROQ query language, and real-time collaboration. The learning curve for GROQ is real but pays off quickly. The main concern is API request limits on the free tier — high-traffic sites can hit the 500K cap. For most developer teams building modern web apps, Sanity is the recommended starting point.\n\n**Best for.** Developer teams, Next.js/React projects, content-heavy sites with custom queries\n\n**Avoid if.** You need a simple blog platform (use Ghost) or want zero learning curve on queries",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "headless-cms-api",
+            "groq-content-querying",
+            "real-time-cms-collaboration",
+            "structured-content-modeling",
+            "nextjs-cms-integration",
+            "custom-content-studio",
+            "content-querying-with-groq",
+            "react-headless-cms",
+            "content-heavy-site-backend",
+            "open-source-cms-studio"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cms"
@@ -29272,13 +29920,309 @@
         "provenance": "hand-curated",
         "experimental": false
     },
+    {
+        "id": "scheduled-jobs-for-agents",
+        "element_type": "task_template",
+        "name": "Cron and background jobs for agents — what to recommend",
+        "description": "When an AI agent recommends a cron / scheduled-job runner: vercel-cron for zero-config under 60s execution, trigger-dev for long-running steps with retries, inngest for event-driven workflows, bullmq + upstash when the user wants a Redis queue specifically. Decision tree backed by ~600 weekly agent fetches across this cluster.",
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "cron-job-scheduling",
+            "vercel-cron-jobs",
+            "scheduled-tasks-vercel",
+            "zero-config-cron",
+            "recurring-task-automation",
+            "serverless-cron-trigger",
+            "background-jobs-nextjs",
+            "typescript-background-jobs",
+            "nodejs-scheduled-tasks",
+            "background-job-queue"
+        ],
+        "aliases_search": [
+            "cron for nextjs agent recommendation",
+            "scheduled jobs cursor recommendation",
+            "vercel cron vs trigger dev",
+            "background jobs serverless recommendation",
+            "best cron service for AI app",
+            "agent installable cron",
+            "trigger background job nextjs",
+            "long running job vercel",
+            "queue with retry agent recommendation",
+            "which cron should my agent recommend",
+            "which background job runner for a new project",
+            "cron for vercel app",
+            "cron for railway app",
+            "cron job scheduling decision",
+            "serverless background job decision"
+        ],
+        "categories": [
+            "cron",
+            "scheduled-jobs",
+            "background-jobs",
+            "agent-tools",
+            "dev-infra",
+            "task-template"
+        ],
+        "works_with": [
+            "claude-code",
+            "claude-desktop",
+            "chatgpt",
+            "cursor",
+            "openclaw"
+        ],
+        "fit_by_agent": {
+            "claude-code": true,
+            "claude-desktop": true,
+            "chatgpt": true,
+            "cursor": true,
+            "openclaw": true
+        },
+        "evals": [
+            {
+                "method_id": "auxiliar-scheduled-jobs-decision-framework-v1",
+                "score": 8,
+                "score_breakdown": {
+                    "candidates_ranked": 8,
+                    "decision_tree_coverage": 9,
+                    "failure_mode_documentation": 9,
+                    "agent-fetch-demand-anchor": 10,
+                    "pending_cold_start_corpus": 0
+                },
+                "corpus_id": "auxiliar-scheduled-jobs-corpus-v1-pending",
+                "last_run": "2026-05-28",
+                "candidates_outranked": 5,
+                "consumer_models_tested": []
+            },
+            {
+                "method_id": "auxiliar-cron-cold-start-v1",
+                "score": 7.5,
+                "score_breakdown": {
+                    "config_friction_scored": 9,
+                    "handler_friction_scored": 9,
+                    "documented_cold_start_ms_scored": 9,
+                    "retry_semantics_scored": 9,
+                    "max_execution_seconds_scored": 9,
+                    "pending_deploy_measure_automation": 0
+                },
+                "corpus_id": "auxiliar-cron-cold-start-v1",
+                "last_run": "2026-05-28",
+                "candidates_outranked": 6,
+                "consumer_models_tested": []
+            }
+        ],
+        "cost": {
+            "type": "free",
+            "free_tier": "The /solve/ page is free editorial content. Each candidate has its own pricing — vercel-cron is free up to Hobby limits, trigger-dev has a generous free tier, inngest free for low volume, bullmq is self-hosted + Redis cost.",
+            "hidden_costs": [],
+            "cost_per_unit": {}
+        },
+        "pricing_tiers": [],
+        "compliance": [],
+        "risks": [],
+        "deps": {
+            "requires": [],
+            "composes_with": [
+                "vercel-cron",
+                "render",
+                "trigger-dev",
+                "trigger-dev-cron",
+                "inngest",
+                "bullmq",
+                "upstash"
+            ],
+            "conflicts": []
+        },
+        "last_verified": "2026-05-28",
+        "verification_method": "auxiliar-scheduled-jobs-decision-framework-v1",
+        "alternatives_considered": [
+            {
+                "name": "GitHub Actions scheduled workflows",
+                "dropped_because": "Works but the indirection cost (commit → push → workflow trigger → runner cold-start) makes it awkward for app-level cron in a Next.js / Cursor recommendation context. Listed for completeness, not in the default ranking."
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "AWS EventBridge + Lambda",
+                "dropped_because": "The agent-friendly path for AWS shops, but requires AWS account context the user often doesn't have at recommendation time. Surface when the user states \"I'm on AWS\" — the decision tree does not default-route here."
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "Cloudflare Cron Triggers (Workers)",
+                "dropped_because": "Strong fit for Cloudflare Workers users; not in the indexed catalog yet (tracked in backlog.md \"N1 Phase 2.5 — recommendations-only services without source MD\"). Will be added as a top-tier alternative when the Capability record ships."
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "Render scheduled jobs (built-in cron)",
+                "dropped_because": "Not dropped — listed in the decision tree as the right answer for \"user is already on Render\". Listed here in alternatives_considered for clarity that we considered it as a top pick and ranked it second to vercel-cron based on both surface count and demonstrated agent fetch volume."
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "Self-hosted cron + BullMQ + Redis",
+                "dropped_because": "For users who want full ops control. Ranked but de-emphasized — the recipe is to install bullmq + upstash when the user wants a Redis-backed queue specifically, not as the default cron runner."
+            }
+        ],
+        "compared_to": [],
+        "choose_if": "An AI agent needs to recommend a cron / scheduled-job runner to a user. The decision tree branches on (already on Vercel?, execution > 60s?, event-driven?, needs Redis queue?, already on Render?) so the agent doesn't have to bench-test each candidate live for every user query.",
+        "avoid_if": "The user has stated they need true distributed batch processing (Spark, Airflow, Prefect at scale) — that's data-pipeline territory, not \"schedule this function to run nightly.\" Out of scope for this /solve/ entry by design.",
+        "page_url": "https://auxiliar.ai/solve/scheduled-jobs-for-agents/",
+        "external_homepage": "https://auxiliar.ai/solve/scheduled-jobs-for-agents/",
+        "provenance": "hand-curated",
+        "experimental": false
+    },
+    {
+        "id": "semantic-search-vector-db",
+        "element_type": "task_template",
+        "name": "Vector database for agents — semantic search and embeddings",
+        "description": "When an AI agent recommends a vector DB for RAG or semantic search: pinecone for fully managed at any scale, qdrant for self-hosted / generous free tier, supabase pgvector when Postgres is already in the stack, chroma for prototyping. ~250 weekly agent fetches across this cluster.",
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "semantic-search-backend",
+            "vector-database-hosting",
+            "embedding-storage",
+            "rag-backend",
+            "semantic-search-from-cli",
+            "vector-similarity-search",
+            "hybrid-keyword-vector-search",
+            "multi-modal-vector-search",
+            "self-hosted-vector-db",
+            "hosted-vector-database"
+        ],
+        "aliases_search": [
+            "vector database for AI app",
+            "pinecone vs qdrant vs weaviate",
+            "best vector database claude code",
+            "RAG backend recommendation agent",
+            "embedding storage hosted vs self hosted",
+            "pgvector vs pinecone",
+            "vector db for nextjs agent",
+            "semantic search backend",
+            "which vector database for a new project",
+            "vector database decision framework",
+            "vector db for cursor recommendation",
+            "rag vector storage decision",
+            "embeddings storage decision",
+            "vector database for openai embeddings",
+            "which vector database should my agent recommend"
+        ],
+        "categories": [
+            "vector-database",
+            "semantic-search",
+            "embeddings",
+            "rag",
+            "agent-tools",
+            "dev-infra",
+            "task-template"
+        ],
+        "works_with": [
+            "claude-code",
+            "claude-desktop",
+            "chatgpt",
+            "cursor",
+            "openclaw"
+        ],
+        "fit_by_agent": {
+            "claude-code": true,
+            "claude-desktop": true,
+            "chatgpt": true,
+            "cursor": true,
+            "openclaw": true
+        },
+        "evals": [
+            {
+                "method_id": "auxiliar-vector-db-decision-framework-v1",
+                "score": 7.5,
+                "score_breakdown": {
+                    "candidates_ranked": 8,
+                    "decision_tree_coverage": 8,
+                    "cost_at_scale_modeling": 8,
+                    "agent-fetch-demand-anchor": 9,
+                    "pending_recall_corpus": 0
+                },
+                "corpus_id": "auxiliar-vector-db-corpus-v1-pending",
+                "last_run": "2026-05-28",
+                "candidates_outranked": 4,
+                "consumer_models_tested": []
+            },
+            {
+                "method_id": "auxiliar-vector-recall-at-10-corpus-v1",
+                "score": 9.4,
+                "score_breakdown": {
+                    "chroma_recall_at_10": 9.4,
+                    "pinecone_pending": 0,
+                    "qdrant_pending": 0,
+                    "weaviate_pending": 0,
+                    "supabase_pgvector_pending": 0
+                },
+                "corpus_id": "auxiliar-vector-db-corpus-v1",
+                "last_run": "2026-05-28",
+                "candidates_outranked": 0,
+                "consumer_models_tested": [
+                    "all-MiniLM-L6-v2"
+                ]
+            }
+        ],
+        "cost": {
+            "type": "free",
+            "free_tier": "The /solve/ page is free editorial content. Each candidate has its own pricing — pinecone has a starter free tier, qdrant cloud has a small free tier (or run Docker for free), supabase pgvector is bundled with the supabase tier the user is already on, chroma is in-process so free.",
+            "hidden_costs": [],
+            "cost_per_unit": {}
+        },
+        "pricing_tiers": [],
+        "compliance": [],
+        "risks": [],
+        "deps": {
+            "requires": [],
+            "composes_with": [
+                "pinecone",
+                "qdrant",
+                "weaviate",
+                "chroma",
+                "supabase"
+            ],
+            "conflicts": []
+        },
+        "last_verified": "2026-05-28",
+        "verification_method": "auxiliar-vector-db-decision-framework-v1",
+        "alternatives_considered": [
+            {
+                "name": "Cloudflare Vectorize",
+                "dropped_because": "Strong fit for Cloudflare Workers ecosystem, not in the indexed catalog yet (tracked in backlog.md). Will be added as a top-tier alternative when its Capability record ships and we have a chance to verify pricing + recall characteristics."
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "Milvus (self-hosted)",
+                "dropped_because": "Powerful for large-scale self-hosted vector workloads. The ops cost of running it correctly is high enough that recommending it to a user who just asked \"where do I put my embeddings\" is overshoot. Listed here so a user with a clear ops team can route there."
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "Postgres FTS (no vector)",
+                "dropped_because": "Not a vector database. Listed only because some users conflate \"semantic search\" with \"good full-text search\" — when the user actually wants keyword-tolerant FTS, route to algolia / typesense / postgres tsvector instead of forcing them into vector hosting they don't need."
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "Redis vector search (Redis Stack / Upstash Vector)",
+                "dropped_because": "Real option, especially for users already running Redis. Currently doesn't anchor enough agent demand to make the default top-pick list; routed via the decision tree when the user states \"I'm already on Redis.\""
+            },
+            {
+                "name": "Elasticsearch + dense_vector field",
+                "dropped_because": "Real option when the user is already running Elasticsearch / OpenSearch. Decision tree routes there. Not promoted as a default because users almost never want to stand up an ES cluster solely to hold embeddings."
+            }
+        ],
+        "compared_to": [],
+        "choose_if": "An AI agent needs to recommend a vector database / semantic-search backend to a user for RAG, similarity search, or embedding storage. The decision tree branches on (prototyping?, < 1M vectors?, Postgres already in stack?, want fully managed?, cost-sensitive at scale?, multi-modal?) so the agent doesn't have to bench-test.",
+        "avoid_if": "The user wants keyword full-text search, not semantic / vector. Route to algolia / typesense / meilisearch / postgres FTS instead. The decision tree explicitly calls this out as a routing fork up front so the agent doesn't accidentally recommend vector when the user wanted keyword.",
+        "page_url": "https://auxiliar.ai/solve/semantic-search-vector-db/",
+        "external_homepage": "https://auxiliar.ai/solve/semantic-search-vector-db/",
+        "provenance": "hand-curated",
+        "experimental": false
+    },
     {
         "id": "sendgrid",
         "element_type": "cloud_service",
         "name": "SendGrid",
         "description": "Legacy email platform with both transactional and marketing features. Trust declining post-Twilio acquisition — 47 developers migrated away in recent surveys.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Acquired by Twilio in 2019. Large installed base but declining developer trust. Risk: product stagnation, degraded support, and pricing uncertainty under Twilio's cost-cutting.\n\n**Verdict.** Avoid for new projects — migrate to Resend (DX), Postmark (deliverability), or AWS SES (cost) instead.\n\nSendGrid was the default choice for years, but post-Twilio acquisition, the product has stagnated. Deliverability issues, degraded support, and a complex API make it hard to recommend for new projects. If you're already on SendGrid and it's working, there's no urgency to migrate. But for new projects, Resend (DX) or Postmark (deliverability) or AWS SES (cost) are all better choices.\n\n**Best for.** Existing users with stable setups; projects needing transactional + marketing in one platform\n\n**Avoid if.** Starting a new project (choose Resend or Postmark); need a free tier (none available since May 2025); deliverability is critical (choose Postmark)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "transactional-email-sending",
+            "marketing-email-campaigns",
+            "email-api-integration",
+            "bulk-email-delivery",
+            "transactional-and-marketing-combined",
+            "twilio-ecosystem-email",
+            "email-platform-migration",
+            "smtp-relay-service",
+            "email-deliverability-tracking"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "email"
@@ -29418,7 +30362,17 @@
         "name": "Sentry",
         "description": "Industry-standard error tracking with performance monitoring. Open source self-host option. Best error tracking DX, but alert fatigue is real.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Established company, founded 2012, $217M raised. Used by Disney, GitHub, Atlassian. Open source (BSL license). Very low risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Sentry for error tracking and performance monitoring — it's the industry standard with the best DX.\n\nSentry is the best error tracking tool for most projects. Source map support, release tracking, and performance monitoring are excellent. The 50+ SDK ecosystem means it works with virtually any stack. The main issues are alert fatigue (requires configuration) and the complex self-hosted setup. For most teams, the Team plan ($26/mo) provides excellent value.\n\n**Best for.** Any project that needs error tracking — web apps, mobile apps, backend services\n\n**Avoid if.** You only need product analytics (use PostHog) or full observability (use Datadog)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "error-tracking-with-source-maps",
+            "frontend-error-monitoring",
+            "backend-exception-capture",
+            "performance-monitoring-apm",
+            "release-tracking-errors",
+            "self-hosted-error-tracking",
+            "crash-reporting-sdk",
+            "alert-fatigue-management",
+            "mobile-app-crash-tracking"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "monitoring"
@@ -29635,7 +30589,17 @@
         "name": "Statsig",
         "description": "Feature flags combined with experimentation and analytics. Free tier includes 1M events/month. Usage-based pricing is more cost-effective than per-seat for most teams.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2021 by ex-Facebook engineers. $43M raised. Focus on product experimentation. Notable customers include Notion, Figma, Flipkart. Risk: younger company; event-based billing can spike.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Statsig for feature flags when you also need A/B testing and experimentation at usage-based pricing.\n\nStatsig uniquely combines feature flags with robust experimentation, built by ex-Facebook engineers who know product experimentation at scale. Usage-based pricing is more cost-effective than per-seat for most teams. The main risks are event-based billing spikes and a younger platform compared to LaunchDarkly.\n\n**Best for.** Growth teams, product-led companies, teams needing flags + experimentation, startups\n\n**Avoid if.** You need enterprise governance maturity (use LaunchDarkly) or want open-source (use Flagsmith)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "feature-flag-rollout",
+            "ab-testing-with-flags",
+            "product-experimentation-platform",
+            "usage-based-feature-flags",
+            "experiment-statistical-analysis",
+            "gradual-feature-rollout",
+            "kill-switch-with-analytics",
+            "flag-and-experiment-combined",
+            "growth-team-experimentation"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "feature-flags"
@@ -29767,7 +30731,17 @@
         "name": "Strapi",
         "description": "Open source headless CMS, self-hosted with full control. Largest plugin ecosystem, but self-hosting requires DevOps.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Open source company, founded 2015, $31M raised. 60K+ GitHub stars. Strong community. Used by IBM, NASA, Toyota. Low risk (open source).\n\n**Verdict.** Use Strapi for projects where self-hosting, full data ownership, and zero per-seat pricing matter more than managed convenience.\n\nStrapi is the leading open source headless CMS with the largest plugin ecosystem and community. Self-hosting gives you unlimited users, unlimited content, and full data ownership. The trade-off is DevOps overhead — you manage the server, database, and deployments. Strapi Cloud removes this burden but adds API call limits and per-seat pricing. For teams comfortable with hosting, Strapi offers the best value.\n\n**Best for.** Teams with DevOps capability, budget-conscious projects, GDPR-sensitive deployments\n\n**Avoid if.** You want zero ops overhead (use Sanity) or need enterprise workflows out of the box (use Contentful)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "self-hosted-headless-cms",
+            "open-source-content-management",
+            "full-data-ownership-cms",
+            "zero-per-seat-cms-pricing",
+            "gdpr-compliant-cms-hosting",
+            "cms-plugin-ecosystem",
+            "self-hosted-strapi-deployment",
+            "content-api-self-hosted",
+            "headless-cms-no-vendor-lock"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cms"
@@ -29894,7 +30868,18 @@
         "name": "Stripe",
         "description": "The most popular payment API. Maximum flexibility, best documentation, global coverage — but you're responsible for tax collection and compliance.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Stripe Inc. $95B valuation, 14+ year track record. De facto standard for developer payments. 99.999% average historical uptime. 195 countries, 135+ currencies, 100+ payment methods. Risk: near zero for availability; complexity grows with features.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Stripe when you need maximum payment flexibility and can handle tax compliance — it's the industry standard for a reason.\n\nStripe has the best API, documentation, and ecosystem of any payment provider. It supports every payment method, currency, and use case imaginable. The tradeoff is that you're responsible for tax compliance — Stripe is not a merchant of record. For most developers building serious products, Stripe is the default choice.\n\n**Best for.** Any project needing flexible payments, marketplaces, subscriptions, or custom billing\n\n**Avoid if.** You're a solo dev selling digital products and don't want to deal with tax (use Lemon Squeezy or Paddle)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "stripe-payment-integration",
+            "accept-credit-card-payments",
+            "subscription-billing-api",
+            "marketplace-payments",
+            "multi-currency-checkout",
+            "custom-billing-logic",
+            "recurring-payments-setup",
+            "global-payment-processing",
+            "payment-method-collection",
+            "checkout-flow-implementation"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "payments"
@@ -30038,7 +31023,18 @@
         "name": "Supabase Auth",
         "description": "Auth built into the Supabase platform. PostgreSQL-backed, Row Level Security integration, generous free tier (50K MAU free, 100K on Pro at $0.00325/MAU overage — far cheaper than Clerk's $0.02/MRU) — but tightly coupled to Supabase.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** YC startup, $116M raised, growing fast. Strong open-source community. Risk: auth is bundled with the platform — if Supabase pivots, auth goes with it.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Supabase Auth when you're already on Supabase — the PostgreSQL RLS integration is uniquely powerful and eliminates a whole class of authorization bugs.\n\nSupabase Auth is the best choice when you're using Supabase as your backend platform. The integration with PostgreSQL Row Level Security is uniquely powerful — auth and data authorization in one system. The free tier is generous (50K MAU), and Pro gives 100K MAU with overage at just $0.00325/MAU — roughly 6x cheaper than Clerk ($0.02/MRU). The main trade-off is coupling: you're committing to the Supabase platform, not just an auth service.\n\n**Best for.** Projects already on Supabase, apps that benefit from PostgreSQL RLS, full-stack projects wanting one platform\n\n**Avoid if.** You only need auth (not database), or you want to avoid platform coupling",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "supabase-auth-integration",
+            "postgresql-row-level-security",
+            "user-authentication-supabase",
+            "auth-with-rls",
+            "magic-link-email-auth",
+            "social-oauth-login",
+            "jwt-session-management",
+            "multi-tenant-row-security",
+            "free-tier-auth-50k-mau",
+            "platform-bundled-auth"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "auth"
@@ -30167,7 +31163,18 @@
         "name": "Supabase",
         "description": "Open-source Firebase alternative with managed Postgres. Full platform with auth (100K MAU on Pro), storage, realtime, edge functions — with a spend cap to prevent bill shock.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Supabase Inc. YC-backed startup with $116M raised, growing fast with strong community adoption. 99.7K GitHub stars, massive open-source community. Now offers database branching ($0.01344/branch-hour on Pro). Risk: platform bundling means you depend on one vendor for auth + database + storage.\n\n**Verdict.** Pick Supabase when you will use the full platform (auth + storage + realtime); skip it if you only need a database.\n\nSupabase shines when you use the full platform — Postgres + Auth + Storage + Realtime + Edge Functions. The developer experience is excellent and the client SDK makes CRUD operations trivial. If you only need a database, you're over-buying. The free tier pause behavior is annoying but the Pro tier at $25/month is competitive for the full stack you get.\n\n**Best for.** Full-stack apps, rapid prototyping, projects that benefit from auth + database + storage in one platform\n\n**Avoid if.** You only need a database, need enterprise SLA without $599/month, or need high-performance at scale",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "managed-postgres-hosting",
+            "full-stack-backend-platform",
+            "auth-with-managed-postgres",
+            "realtime-database-subscriptions",
+            "file-storage-with-database",
+            "edge-functions-deployment",
+            "database-branching",
+            "rapid-prototype-backend",
+            "firebase-alternative-postgres",
+            "row-level-security-auth"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "database"
@@ -30443,7 +31450,16 @@
         "name": "Trigger.dev",
         "description": "Scheduled tasks and background jobs for Node.js. TypeScript-first with great developer experience. Free tier includes 50K runs/month. Best DX for TypeScript teams.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2022, $3.6M raised. Open source. TypeScript-first focus. Growing community in Node.js ecosystem. Risk: younger company; Node.js only.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Trigger.dev for TypeScript-first scheduled tasks where developer experience and simplicity matter most.\n\nTrigger.dev offers the best developer experience for TypeScript teams needing scheduled tasks. The API is clean and intuitive, with good observability. The main limitations are Node.js-only support and a younger, evolving platform. For simple cron in TypeScript, it's the most pleasant option.\n\n**Best for.** TypeScript teams, Next.js/Node.js projects, background jobs + cron combined\n\n**Avoid if.** You need Python/Go support (use Inngest) or durable step functions (use Inngest)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "typescript-background-jobs",
+            "nodejs-scheduled-tasks",
+            "cron-job-scheduling",
+            "background-job-queue",
+            "typescript-cron-jobs",
+            "nextjs-background-tasks",
+            "scheduled-task-runner",
+            "recurring-job-execution"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cron"
@@ -30564,7 +31580,17 @@
         "name": "Trigger.dev",
         "description": "Background jobs for Next.js and Node.js. Open source, serverless-friendly, excellent DX. Best for simple-to-medium background jobs.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Startup, founded 2022, YC W23. Open source, 10K+ GitHub stars. Growing community. Medium risk (young company).\n\n**Verdict.** Use Trigger.dev for background jobs in Next.js/Node.js projects — best DX with a generous 50K free runs/month.\n\nTrigger.dev offers the best developer experience for background jobs in the Node.js ecosystem. The SDK is clean, type-safe, and integrates seamlessly with Next.js. The 50K runs/month free tier is generous. The limitations are Node.js-only support, a 5 concurrent run limit on free tier, and the project's relative youth. For most Next.js projects needing background processing, Trigger.dev is the recommended choice.\n\n**Best for.** Next.js/Node.js background jobs, email sending, image processing, API sync, data pipelines\n\n**Avoid if.** You're not using Node.js (use Inngest), need complex workflows (use Inngest), or want zero vendor dependency (use BullMQ)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "background-jobs-nextjs",
+            "serverless-job-queue",
+            "nodejs-task-scheduling",
+            "async-email-sending",
+            "image-processing-queue",
+            "api-sync-background",
+            "data-pipeline-jobs",
+            "open-source-job-runner",
+            "scheduled-tasks-nodejs"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "queues"
@@ -30693,7 +31719,17 @@
         "name": "Turso",
         "description": "Edge-native SQLite database built on libSQL. 100 free databases with 5 GB storage. Zero cold starts, embedded replicas for edge deployments.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Turso (ChiselStrike Inc). YC-backed startup. Built on libSQL (open-source fork of SQLite). Risk: younger company, SQLite has different trade-offs than PostgreSQL.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Turso for edge-native apps (SvelteKit, Remix, Astro) where zero cold starts and embedded replicas matter — but only if your stack supports libSQL.\n\nTurso is the best database for edge deployments. Zero cold starts (unlike Neon's 350ms on free tier), embedded read replicas for zero-latency reads, and a generous free tier (5 GB storage, 100 databases). The trade-off is ecosystem: it's SQLite/libSQL, not PostgreSQL. Drizzle ORM has excellent support; Prisma works via adapter; other ORMs may not. For SvelteKit or Remix on Vercel Edge or Cloudflare Workers, Turso is the best choice.\n\n**Best for.** Edge deployments (SvelteKit, Remix, Astro on Vercel Edge/Cloudflare Workers), apps needing zero cold starts\n\n**Avoid if.** You need PostgreSQL, your ORM requires PostgreSQL, or you have complex analytical queries",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "edge-native-sqlite-database",
+            "zero-cold-start-database",
+            "embedded-read-replicas",
+            "cloudflare-workers-database",
+            "svelte-kit-edge-database",
+            "libsql-database-hosting",
+            "sqlite-edge-deployment",
+            "free-sqlite-hosting",
+            "vercel-edge-database"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "database"
@@ -30835,7 +31871,18 @@
         "name": "Twilio",
         "description": "Market-leading SMS API with the most features. Pricing starts at $0.0079/SMS (US). Complex pricing with carrier fees, but broadest feature set including voice, video, and WhatsApp.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2008, public company (TWLO). $4B+ annual revenue. Market leader in communications APIs. Notable customers include Uber, Airbnb, Netflix. Risk: complex pricing; acquired SendGrid (trust declining).\n\n**Verdict.** Use Twilio for complex communication needs where the broadest API surface matters more than simple pricing.\n\nTwilio is the undisputed market leader in communications APIs with the broadest feature set (SMS, voice, video, WhatsApp, email via SendGrid). The main pain point is complex, opaque pricing with carrier fees and regulatory surcharges that make cost estimation difficult. For simple SMS-only needs, Vonage is cheaper.\n\n**Best for.** Full communication stack (SMS + voice + video), large teams, complex routing, US-focused businesses\n\n**Avoid if.** You only need basic SMS (use Vonage) or need EU-first GDPR compliance (use MessageBird)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "sms-sending-api",
+            "programmable-voice-calls",
+            "whatsapp-messaging-api",
+            "video-calling-api",
+            "multi-channel-communications",
+            "sms-voice-video-combined",
+            "phone-number-provisioning",
+            "transactional-sms-delivery",
+            "complex-call-routing",
+            "two-factor-auth-sms"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "sms"
@@ -30970,7 +32017,17 @@
         "name": "Typesense",
         "description": "Open-source search engine with great developer experience. Self-host for free or use Typesense Cloud. Best Algolia alternative with lower cost and no vendor lock-in.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Typesense Inc. VC-backed, founded 2017. Open-source (GPL-3). Growing adoption — used by Logitech, Buildkite, and others. Risk: smaller company than Algolia; strong open-source community.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Typesense when you want Algolia-quality search with open-source flexibility and self-hosting options at a fraction of the cost.\n\nTypesense is the best Algolia alternative available. It offers fast, typo-tolerant search with a clean API, good documentation, and an optional managed cloud. The self-hosted option means zero vendor lock-in. The ecosystem is smaller than Algolia's, but growing fast — and the InstantSearch adapter covers most common use cases.\n\n**Best for.** Teams that want great search without vendor lock-in, self-hosting enthusiasts, and Algolia users looking to reduce costs\n\n**Avoid if.** You need every Algolia widget and integration out of the box, or don't want to evaluate a smaller ecosystem",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "typo-tolerant-search-engine",
+            "self-hosted-search",
+            "algolia-alternative",
+            "full-text-search-api",
+            "managed-search-cloud",
+            "open-source-search",
+            "faceted-search-indexing",
+            "instant-search-results",
+            "search-without-vendor-lock-in"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "search"
@@ -31096,7 +32153,16 @@
         "name": "UploadThing",
         "description": "File uploads purpose-built for Next.js and React. Best DX for the React ecosystem, but limited outside it.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Ping Labs, YC startup, founded 2023. Small team, growing fast. Created by Theo Browne (t3.gg). Medium risk (young company).\n\n**Verdict.** Use UploadThing for React/Next.js projects where you want the fastest time-to-working-uploads with type-safe routes.\n\nUploadThing offers the best DX for file uploads in the React ecosystem. Type-safe file routes, pre-built UI components, and 5-minute setup make it excellent for prototyping and small-to-medium apps. The limitations are framework lock-in, a tiny free tier (2 GB), and the risk of depending on a young startup. For larger apps or non-React projects, use R2 or S3 directly.\n\n**Best for.** React/Next.js projects, prototypes, small-to-medium apps with user uploads\n\n**Avoid if.** Not using React (use R2/S3), need more than 100 GB (use R2/S3), or need long-term vendor stability",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "file-upload-nextjs",
+            "react-file-upload-component",
+            "type-safe-upload-routes",
+            "prebuilt-upload-ui",
+            "user-file-uploads",
+            "prototype-file-uploads",
+            "nextjs-storage-integration",
+            "small-app-file-hosting"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "storage"
@@ -31225,7 +32291,17 @@
         "name": "Upstash",
         "description": "Serverless Redis with HTTP-based access and pay-per-request pricing. Best Redis option for serverless and edge runtimes.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Startup, founded 2021, $8M raised. Growing fast in the serverless ecosystem. Used by Vercel, Deno, Cloudflare ecosystem. Low-medium risk.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Upstash for serverless and edge Redis — the only Redis that works with HTTP in serverless functions and edge runtimes.\n\nUpstash is the best Redis option for serverless and edge environments. HTTP-based access eliminates connection pool issues in serverless cold starts. Pay-per-request pricing aligns cost with actual usage. The trade-offs are slightly higher latency than native Redis and a limited free tier (10K commands/day). For serverless apps, Upstash is the clear choice.\n\n**Best for.** Serverless functions, edge runtimes, Next.js/Vercel projects, rate limiting, session storage\n\n**Avoid if.** You need high-throughput persistent connections (use Redis Cloud) or want zero cost (use Dragonfly self-hosted)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "serverless-redis-hosting",
+            "edge-runtime-redis",
+            "http-based-redis-access",
+            "pay-per-request-caching",
+            "redis-for-nextjs-vercel",
+            "serverless-session-storage",
+            "rate-limiting-serverless",
+            "cache-without-connection-pools",
+            "redis-cold-start-safe"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cache"
@@ -31353,7 +32429,16 @@
         "name": "Vercel Cron",
         "description": "Built-in cron jobs for Vercel projects. Zero configuration — just add cron expressions to vercel.json. Free on Hobby (1/day), unlimited on Pro. Vercel-only.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Vercel (founded 2015, $563M raised). Built into the Vercel platform. Zero additional cost on Pro plan. Risk: complete vendor lock-in to Vercel.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Vercel Cron for simple scheduled tasks if you're already on Vercel Pro and don't need retries or observability.\n\nVercel Cron is the simplest way to add scheduled tasks to a Vercel project — just add cron expressions to vercel.json. No SDK, no additional service, no extra cost on Pro. The trade-offs are severe: complete vendor lock-in, no retries, no observability, and a nearly unusable Hobby tier.\n\n**Best for.** Vercel Pro users, simple scheduled tasks, projects already committed to Vercel\n\n**Avoid if.** You're not on Vercel (obvious), need retries/observability (use Inngest), or are on Hobby tier",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "vercel-cron-jobs",
+            "scheduled-tasks-vercel",
+            "cron-job-scheduling",
+            "zero-config-cron",
+            "recurring-task-automation",
+            "serverless-cron-trigger",
+            "vercel-project-scheduling",
+            "time-based-task-execution"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "cron"
@@ -31477,7 +32562,17 @@
         "name": "Vercel",
         "description": "The deployment platform behind Next.js. Best-in-class for React frameworks with edge functions, preview deployments, and Fluid compute — but per-seat pricing and bandwidth overage can add up.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Vercel Inc. Well-funded ($250M+ raised), created Next.js. Risk: bandwidth overage pricing ($0.15/GB) has caused surprise bills for viral content. Platform lock-in for advanced features.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Vercel for Next.js projects — but set up spend alerts for bandwidth and understand the $0.15/GB overage before going viral.\n\nVercel is the default choice for Next.js. Preview deployments, edge functions, ISR, and image optimization work perfectly because Vercel built the framework. The risk is bandwidth pricing — multiple developers have reported surprise bills in the thousands after viral content. Set up spend alerts and consider a CDN in front for static assets.\n\n**Best for.** Next.js projects, React-based frontends, JAMstack sites\n\n**Avoid if.** Budget-sensitive projects with unpredictable traffic, or non-Next.js backends",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "nextjs-deployment-hosting",
+            "preview-deployments-per-branch",
+            "edge-functions-deployment",
+            "react-frontend-hosting",
+            "jamstack-site-deployment",
+            "incremental-static-regeneration",
+            "image-optimization-cdn",
+            "serverless-frontend-platform",
+            "next-js-first-party-support"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "deploy"
@@ -31615,7 +32710,16 @@
         "name": "Vonage",
         "description": "Formerly Nexmo. Good international SMS coverage with simpler pricing than Twilio. $0.0068/SMS (US). Strong voice and video APIs. Dashboard UX is dated but API is solid.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Acquired by Ericsson (2022). Formerly Nexmo, rebranded to Vonage. Large enterprise backing. Notable customers include Deliveroo, Glassdoor. Risk: post-acquisition strategy shifting; dashboard UX dated.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Vonage for SMS when you want simpler pricing than Twilio with good international coverage.\n\nVonage offers competitive per-message pricing ($0.0068 US) with good international coverage. The API is solid and well-documented. The main drawbacks are a dated dashboard, limited trial credit, and uncertainty around the Ericsson acquisition. For straightforward SMS needs, it's a cost-effective Twilio alternative.\n\n**Best for.** International SMS, cost-conscious teams, Twilio alternative, voice + SMS combined\n\n**Avoid if.** You need the newest DX (use Twilio) or EU-first GDPR compliance (use MessageBird)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "send-sms-api",
+            "international-sms-delivery",
+            "transactional-sms-messages",
+            "twilio-alternative-sms",
+            "bulk-sms-low-cost",
+            "voice-and-sms-combined",
+            "programmable-voice-api",
+            "outbound-sms-international"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "sms"
@@ -31746,7 +32850,17 @@
         "name": "Weaviate",
         "description": "Open-source vector database with built-in vectorization modules. Self-host free or use Weaviate Cloud. Strong module ecosystem for text, image, and multi-modal search.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** Founded 2019, $67.7M raised. Open source (BSD-3). Growing community and enterprise adoption. Notable customers include Red Hat, StackOverflow. Risk: cloud offering still maturing.\n\n**Verdict.** Use Weaviate for production vector search where open-source flexibility and built-in vectorization modules matter.\n\nWeaviate stands out with its module ecosystem that handles vectorization natively — you can index text/images without external embedding pipelines. The GraphQL API is powerful for complex queries. Self-hosting is free but resource-intensive. The cloud offering is maturing quickly.\n\n**Best for.** Teams wanting open-source vector DB with built-in AI modules, multi-modal search, self-hosting option\n\n**Avoid if.** You want zero-ops simplicity (use Pinecone) or need minimal resource footprint (use Qdrant)",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "vector-database-hosting",
+            "semantic-search-backend",
+            "multimodal-vector-search",
+            "self-hosted-vector-db",
+            "built-in-text-vectorization",
+            "image-similarity-search",
+            "open-source-vector-search",
+            "graphql-vector-queries",
+            "embedding-free-indexing"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "vector"
@@ -31881,7 +32995,17 @@
         "name": "WorkOS",
         "description": "Enterprise-ready auth platform with AuthKit. 1M MAU free, built-in SSO/SCIM/RBAC — strongest enterprise auth play, but SSO connections are $125/month each.",
         "long_description": "**Vendor.** WorkOS Inc. Well-funded, enterprise-focused. Risk: enterprise SSO pricing adds up fast with many connections.\n\n**Verdict.** Use WorkOS when you need enterprise-ready auth (SSO, SCIM, RBAC) with a 1M MAU free tier — but model your per-connection SSO costs before committing.\n\nWorkOS is the strongest play for apps that need to sell to enterprises. The 1M MAU free tier for AuthKit is the most generous in the market, and the enterprise features (SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit Logs) are battle-tested. The compliance story is exceptional: SOC 2, SOC 3, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, and CSA STAR. The risk is SSO connection pricing at $125/month each — this adds up fast as your enterprise customer base grows. For B2B SaaS targeting enterprise buyers, WorkOS is the clear choice. For consumer apps or cost-sensitive startups, Clerk or Auth.js may be better fits.\n\n**Best for.** B2B SaaS that needs enterprise SSO, SCIM, and RBAC with minimal implementation effort\n\n**Avoid if.** You only need consumer auth, want pre-built UI components, or can't afford $125/connection for SSO at scale",
-        "jtbd_tags": [],
+        "jtbd_tags": [
+            "enterprise-sso-integration",
+            "scim-user-provisioning",
+            "rbac-for-b2b-saas",
+            "saml-sso-connection",
+            "enterprise-auth-platform",
+            "audit-logs-compliance",
+            "soc2-compliant-auth",
+            "free-auth-up-to-1m-mau",
+            "b2b-saas-auth"
+        ],
         "aliases_search": [],
         "categories": [
             "auth"