arkaos 2.59.0 → 2.61.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/VERSION
CHANGED
|
@@ -1 +1 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
2.
|
|
1
|
+
2.61.0
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
id: community-model
|
|
2
|
+
name: Community Business Model
|
|
3
|
+
description: Community business model design — purpose + ideal member + value prop + SPACES role + platform fit + monetisation + growth loop
|
|
4
|
+
department: community
|
|
5
|
+
tier: enterprise
|
|
6
|
+
command: "/community model"
|
|
7
|
+
requires_branch: false
|
|
8
|
+
requires_spec: false
|
|
9
|
+
quality_gate_required: true
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
phases:
|
|
12
|
+
- id: brief
|
|
13
|
+
name: Community Brief
|
|
14
|
+
description: Define niche, founder context, current audience size, success metric, runway
|
|
15
|
+
agents:
|
|
16
|
+
- agent_id: community-strategist-beatriz
|
|
17
|
+
role: Frame niche, founder context, current audience, runway, success metric
|
|
18
|
+
gate:
|
|
19
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
20
|
+
description: User confirms niche and context
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- id: purpose-definition
|
|
23
|
+
name: Purpose & Identity
|
|
24
|
+
description: Define the community's purpose using the Onlyness frame — only community where X for Y who want Z
|
|
25
|
+
agents:
|
|
26
|
+
- agent_id: community-strategist-beatriz
|
|
27
|
+
role: Onlyness frame + community identity statement
|
|
28
|
+
- agent_id: brand-strategist-mateus
|
|
29
|
+
role: Differentiation from adjacent communities
|
|
30
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
31
|
+
gate:
|
|
32
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
33
|
+
description: User approves purpose and identity
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
- id: ideal-member-profile
|
|
36
|
+
name: Ideal Member Profile
|
|
37
|
+
description: Define the IMP (Ideal Member Profile) with firmographics + practitioner level + transformation context
|
|
38
|
+
agents:
|
|
39
|
+
- agent_id: community-strategist-beatriz
|
|
40
|
+
role: IMP definition with belonging triggers + dropout triggers
|
|
41
|
+
gate:
|
|
42
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
43
|
+
description: User approves IMP
|
|
44
|
+
outputs:
|
|
45
|
+
- type: document
|
|
46
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
47
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/Communities/IMP/"
|
|
48
|
+
description: Ideal Member Profile with belonging + dropout triggers
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
- id: spaces-classification
|
|
51
|
+
name: SPACES Classification
|
|
52
|
+
description: Classify the community across the SPACES framework — Support / Product / Action / Content / Engagement / Success
|
|
53
|
+
agents:
|
|
54
|
+
- agent_id: community-strategist-beatriz
|
|
55
|
+
role: SPACES classification with primary + secondary purpose
|
|
56
|
+
gate:
|
|
57
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
58
|
+
description: User approves SPACES role
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
- id: value-prop
|
|
61
|
+
name: Value Proposition (Member-Side + Operator-Side)
|
|
62
|
+
description: Two value props — what the member gets, what the operator gets, why both compound
|
|
63
|
+
agents:
|
|
64
|
+
- agent_id: community-strategist-beatriz
|
|
65
|
+
role: Two-sided value prop with compounding logic
|
|
66
|
+
- agent_id: copy-director-eduardo
|
|
67
|
+
role: Value prop copy for both audiences
|
|
68
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
69
|
+
gate:
|
|
70
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
71
|
+
description: User approves value props
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
- id: platform-fit
|
|
74
|
+
name: Platform Fit
|
|
75
|
+
description: Pick platform based on IMP × SPACES × moderation needs — Discord / Slack / Circle / Mighty / native / open-source
|
|
76
|
+
agents:
|
|
77
|
+
- agent_id: community-strategist-beatriz
|
|
78
|
+
role: Platform selection matrix with fit per dimension
|
|
79
|
+
gate:
|
|
80
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
81
|
+
description: User approves platform choice
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
- id: monetisation
|
|
84
|
+
name: Monetisation Model
|
|
85
|
+
description: Free / freemium / paid / cohort / sponsorship — with unit economics check
|
|
86
|
+
agents:
|
|
87
|
+
- agent_id: community-strategist-beatriz
|
|
88
|
+
role: Monetisation model with conversion + LTV math
|
|
89
|
+
- agent_id: cfo-helena
|
|
90
|
+
role: Unit economics validation
|
|
91
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
92
|
+
gate:
|
|
93
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
94
|
+
description: User approves monetisation model
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
- id: growth-loop
|
|
97
|
+
name: Community Growth Loop
|
|
98
|
+
description: Define the loop — member contributes → status / reach → outsiders notice → join → contribute. Plus K-factor / NRG target.
|
|
99
|
+
agents:
|
|
100
|
+
- agent_id: community-strategist-beatriz
|
|
101
|
+
role: Growth loop spec with mechanism + metric per step
|
|
102
|
+
- agent_id: marketing-director-luna
|
|
103
|
+
role: Loop compounding factor + coordination with other depts (content, paid)
|
|
104
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
105
|
+
gate:
|
|
106
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
107
|
+
description: User approves growth loop
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
- id: self-critique
|
|
110
|
+
name: Self-Critique
|
|
111
|
+
description: Stress-test — does IMP × SPACES × platform align? Does monetisation match member value? Is the loop compounding-positive?
|
|
112
|
+
agents:
|
|
113
|
+
- agent_id: community-strategist-beatriz
|
|
114
|
+
role: Coherence check across all blocks
|
|
115
|
+
gate:
|
|
116
|
+
type: auto
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
- id: quality-gate
|
|
119
|
+
name: Quality Gate
|
|
120
|
+
model_override: opus
|
|
121
|
+
description: Mandatory quality review
|
|
122
|
+
agents:
|
|
123
|
+
- agent_id: cqo-marta
|
|
124
|
+
role: Orchestrate quality review
|
|
125
|
+
- agent_id: copy-director-eduardo
|
|
126
|
+
role: Value prop prose, member-side / operator-side language, no clichés
|
|
127
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
128
|
+
- agent_id: tech-director-francisca
|
|
129
|
+
role: Platform technical feasibility, monetisation tech stack, instrumentation
|
|
130
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
131
|
+
gate:
|
|
132
|
+
type: quality_gate
|
|
133
|
+
required_verdict: APPROVED
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
- id: delivery
|
|
136
|
+
name: Community Model Package Delivery
|
|
137
|
+
description: Compile the community model package — purpose + IMP + SPACES + value props + platform + monetisation + growth loop
|
|
138
|
+
agents:
|
|
139
|
+
- agent_id: community-strategist-beatriz
|
|
140
|
+
role: Full community model package + 1-page executive summary
|
|
141
|
+
gate:
|
|
142
|
+
type: auto
|
|
143
|
+
outputs:
|
|
144
|
+
- type: document
|
|
145
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
146
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/Communities/Models/"
|
|
147
|
+
description: Complete community model — purpose + IMP + SPACES + two-sided value prop + platform + monetisation + growth loop + exec summary
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
id: saas-growth
|
|
2
|
+
name: SaaS Growth Plan
|
|
3
|
+
description: Stage-specific growth plan (seed / Series A / scale) with stage-appropriate metrics, channels, team allocation
|
|
4
|
+
department: saas
|
|
5
|
+
tier: enterprise
|
|
6
|
+
command: "/saas growth"
|
|
7
|
+
requires_branch: false
|
|
8
|
+
requires_spec: false
|
|
9
|
+
quality_gate_required: true
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
phases:
|
|
12
|
+
- id: brief
|
|
13
|
+
name: Growth Brief
|
|
14
|
+
description: Define current stage, ARR, growth rate, runway, target stage end-state
|
|
15
|
+
agents:
|
|
16
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
17
|
+
role: Frame current stage, ARR, growth rate, runway, end-state
|
|
18
|
+
gate:
|
|
19
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
20
|
+
description: User confirms stage context and target
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- id: stage-diagnosis
|
|
23
|
+
name: Stage Diagnosis
|
|
24
|
+
description: Diagnose where the SaaS actually is (vs claims) — seed (PMF search), Series A (PMF + scale prep), scale (efficient growth)
|
|
25
|
+
agents:
|
|
26
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
27
|
+
role: Stage diagnosis with evidence (PMF signals, expansion math, sales motion maturity)
|
|
28
|
+
- agent_id: strategy-director-tomas
|
|
29
|
+
role: Strategic context — category position, competitive intensity
|
|
30
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
31
|
+
gate:
|
|
32
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
33
|
+
description: User approves stage diagnosis
|
|
34
|
+
outputs:
|
|
35
|
+
- type: document
|
|
36
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
37
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/SaaS/Growth/Diagnosis/"
|
|
38
|
+
description: Stage diagnosis with PMF evidence and stage-shift criteria
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
- id: stage-metrics
|
|
41
|
+
name: Stage-Appropriate Metrics
|
|
42
|
+
description: Define the 3-5 metrics that matter at THIS stage (different per stage)
|
|
43
|
+
agents:
|
|
44
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
45
|
+
role: Stage-specific metric set with target per metric
|
|
46
|
+
- agent_id: cfo-helena
|
|
47
|
+
role: Financial metric integration (Magic Number, Net Burn Multiple, CAC payback)
|
|
48
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
49
|
+
gate:
|
|
50
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
51
|
+
description: User approves metric set
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
- id: motion-channel-fit
|
|
54
|
+
name: Motion × Channel Fit (Stage-Adjusted)
|
|
55
|
+
description: Pick GTM motion + channels appropriate to stage (seed = focused, A = scaled-up, scale = portfolio)
|
|
56
|
+
agents:
|
|
57
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
58
|
+
role: Motion + channel selection with stage rationale
|
|
59
|
+
- agent_id: marketing-director-luna
|
|
60
|
+
role: Channel-feasibility validation
|
|
61
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
62
|
+
gate:
|
|
63
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
64
|
+
description: User approves motion + channels
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
- id: team-allocation
|
|
67
|
+
name: Team Allocation
|
|
68
|
+
description: How team headcount maps to the growth plan — first hires per stage, when to hire what
|
|
69
|
+
agents:
|
|
70
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
71
|
+
role: Team allocation with hire-when-X triggers
|
|
72
|
+
- agent_id: coo-sofia
|
|
73
|
+
role: Org design — when to add second-line management
|
|
74
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
75
|
+
gate:
|
|
76
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
77
|
+
description: User approves team allocation
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
- id: budget-runway
|
|
80
|
+
name: Budget × Runway
|
|
81
|
+
description: 12-month budget split across hire / paid / tools / experiments with runway impact
|
|
82
|
+
agents:
|
|
83
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
84
|
+
role: Budget allocation with monthly burn
|
|
85
|
+
- agent_id: cfo-helena
|
|
86
|
+
role: Runway impact + worst-case scenario
|
|
87
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
88
|
+
gate:
|
|
89
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
90
|
+
description: User approves budget × runway plan
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
- id: experiment-portfolio
|
|
93
|
+
name: 90-Day Experiment Portfolio
|
|
94
|
+
description: 3-5 prioritised experiments — hypothesis, success criteria, kill-switch date
|
|
95
|
+
agents:
|
|
96
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
97
|
+
role: Experiment portfolio with hypothesis + MDE + kill date per experiment
|
|
98
|
+
gate:
|
|
99
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
100
|
+
description: User approves experiment portfolio
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
- id: self-critique
|
|
103
|
+
name: Self-Critique
|
|
104
|
+
description: Stress-test the plan — does stage diagnosis support motion choice? Does budget × runway × team math close?
|
|
105
|
+
agents:
|
|
106
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
107
|
+
role: Coherence check across stage / motion / team / budget / experiments
|
|
108
|
+
gate:
|
|
109
|
+
type: auto
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
- id: quality-gate
|
|
112
|
+
name: Quality Gate
|
|
113
|
+
model_override: opus
|
|
114
|
+
description: Mandatory quality review
|
|
115
|
+
agents:
|
|
116
|
+
- agent_id: cqo-marta
|
|
117
|
+
role: Orchestrate quality review
|
|
118
|
+
- agent_id: copy-director-eduardo
|
|
119
|
+
role: Plan prose, stage diagnosis defensibility, no clichés
|
|
120
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
121
|
+
- agent_id: tech-director-francisca
|
|
122
|
+
role: Metric math, budget math, instrumentation feasibility
|
|
123
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
124
|
+
gate:
|
|
125
|
+
type: quality_gate
|
|
126
|
+
required_verdict: APPROVED
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
- id: delivery
|
|
129
|
+
name: Growth Plan Delivery
|
|
130
|
+
description: Compile the growth plan + executive summary + monthly checkpoint cadence
|
|
131
|
+
agents:
|
|
132
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
133
|
+
role: Full growth plan + executive summary + monthly checkpoint schedule
|
|
134
|
+
gate:
|
|
135
|
+
type: auto
|
|
136
|
+
outputs:
|
|
137
|
+
- type: document
|
|
138
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
139
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/SaaS/Growth/"
|
|
140
|
+
description: Complete growth plan — stage diagnosis + metrics + motion + team + budget + experiments + monthly checkpoints
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
id: saas-launch
|
|
2
|
+
name: SaaS Launch Checklist & Execution
|
|
3
|
+
description: SaaS launch checklist + execution plan — pre-launch / launch / post-launch with stage-appropriate distribution
|
|
4
|
+
department: saas
|
|
5
|
+
tier: enterprise
|
|
6
|
+
command: "/saas launch"
|
|
7
|
+
requires_branch: false
|
|
8
|
+
requires_spec: false
|
|
9
|
+
quality_gate_required: true
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
phases:
|
|
12
|
+
- id: brief
|
|
13
|
+
name: Launch Brief
|
|
14
|
+
description: Define product, current beta state, target audience, success metric, launch type (public / private / soft / hard)
|
|
15
|
+
agents:
|
|
16
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
17
|
+
role: Frame product, beta state, audience, success metric, launch type
|
|
18
|
+
gate:
|
|
19
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
20
|
+
description: User confirms launch brief
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- id: readiness-audit
|
|
23
|
+
name: Launch Readiness Audit
|
|
24
|
+
description: Product readiness checklist — feature-complete, performance, billing, support, tracking, legal
|
|
25
|
+
agents:
|
|
26
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
27
|
+
role: Readiness audit with pass/waiver per criterion
|
|
28
|
+
- agent_id: tech-director-francisca
|
|
29
|
+
role: Technical readiness (performance, billing, infra, security)
|
|
30
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
31
|
+
gate:
|
|
32
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
33
|
+
description: User approves launch readiness (zero blockers or explicit waivers)
|
|
34
|
+
outputs:
|
|
35
|
+
- type: document
|
|
36
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
37
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/SaaS/Launches/Readiness/"
|
|
38
|
+
description: Readiness audit with checklist per dimension
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
- id: positioning-message
|
|
41
|
+
name: Positioning & Core Message
|
|
42
|
+
description: Confirm positioning (re-using GTM positioning if exists) + 3-tier message hierarchy
|
|
43
|
+
agents:
|
|
44
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
45
|
+
role: Core message hierarchy (tagline / headline / value props)
|
|
46
|
+
- agent_id: brand-strategist-mateus
|
|
47
|
+
role: Onlyness validation + brand consistency check
|
|
48
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
49
|
+
gate:
|
|
50
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
51
|
+
description: User approves message hierarchy
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
- id: launch-assets
|
|
54
|
+
name: Launch Assets Inventory
|
|
55
|
+
description: Asset inventory — landing page + email + social + product hunt + press kit + demo video + docs
|
|
56
|
+
agents:
|
|
57
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
58
|
+
role: Asset inventory with delivery dates
|
|
59
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
60
|
+
role: Landing page conversion spec
|
|
61
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
62
|
+
- agent_id: copy-director-eduardo
|
|
63
|
+
role: Copy briefs for all launch assets
|
|
64
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
65
|
+
gate:
|
|
66
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
67
|
+
description: User approves asset list and delivery dates
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
- id: channel-sequence
|
|
70
|
+
name: Channel Sequence
|
|
71
|
+
description: Day-by-day channel activation — community → list → social → press → paid
|
|
72
|
+
agents:
|
|
73
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
74
|
+
role: Channel sequence with day-by-day priorities
|
|
75
|
+
- agent_id: marketing-director-luna
|
|
76
|
+
role: Channel-specific tactics + paid ramp plan
|
|
77
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
78
|
+
gate:
|
|
79
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
80
|
+
description: User approves channel sequence
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
- id: launch-day-runbook
|
|
83
|
+
name: Launch Day Runbook
|
|
84
|
+
description: Hour-by-hour launch day — owners, action items, escalation paths, decision gates
|
|
85
|
+
agents:
|
|
86
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
87
|
+
role: Hour-by-hour runbook with named owners + decision gates
|
|
88
|
+
gate:
|
|
89
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
90
|
+
description: User approves launch day runbook
|
|
91
|
+
outputs:
|
|
92
|
+
- type: document
|
|
93
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
94
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/SaaS/Launches/Runbooks/"
|
|
95
|
+
description: Hour-by-hour launch day runbook
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
- id: post-launch-plan
|
|
98
|
+
name: Post-Launch Plan
|
|
99
|
+
description: Week-1 / Month-1 follow-up sequence — retention focus, support scaling, iteration based on real usage
|
|
100
|
+
agents:
|
|
101
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
102
|
+
role: Week-1 + Month-1 post-launch plan with retention focus
|
|
103
|
+
gate:
|
|
104
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
105
|
+
description: User approves post-launch plan
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
- id: self-critique
|
|
108
|
+
name: Self-Critique
|
|
109
|
+
description: Stress-test the launch — are readiness waivers acceptable? Does channel sequence match audience reality? Are decision gates actionable?
|
|
110
|
+
agents:
|
|
111
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
112
|
+
role: Launch coherence + readiness defensibility check
|
|
113
|
+
gate:
|
|
114
|
+
type: auto
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
- id: quality-gate
|
|
117
|
+
name: Quality Gate
|
|
118
|
+
model_override: opus
|
|
119
|
+
description: Mandatory quality review
|
|
120
|
+
agents:
|
|
121
|
+
- agent_id: cqo-marta
|
|
122
|
+
role: Orchestrate quality review
|
|
123
|
+
- agent_id: copy-director-eduardo
|
|
124
|
+
role: All launch copy + message hierarchy + no over-promise
|
|
125
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
126
|
+
- agent_id: tech-director-francisca
|
|
127
|
+
role: Readiness audit accuracy + tracking + scalability
|
|
128
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
129
|
+
gate:
|
|
130
|
+
type: quality_gate
|
|
131
|
+
required_verdict: APPROVED
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
- id: delivery
|
|
134
|
+
name: Launch Package Delivery
|
|
135
|
+
description: Compile launch package — readiness + assets + channel sequence + runbook + post-launch plan
|
|
136
|
+
agents:
|
|
137
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
138
|
+
role: Full launch package + 1-page executive summary
|
|
139
|
+
gate:
|
|
140
|
+
type: auto
|
|
141
|
+
outputs:
|
|
142
|
+
- type: document
|
|
143
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
144
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/SaaS/Launches/"
|
|
145
|
+
description: Complete launch package — readiness + positioning + assets + channel sequence + launch day runbook + post-launch plan + exec summary
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
id: saas-plg
|
|
2
|
+
name: Product-Led Growth Setup
|
|
3
|
+
description: Product-Led Growth setup — freemium or trial model selection, activation event design, monetisation trigger, expansion mechanics
|
|
4
|
+
department: saas
|
|
5
|
+
tier: enterprise
|
|
6
|
+
command: "/saas plg"
|
|
7
|
+
requires_branch: false
|
|
8
|
+
requires_spec: false
|
|
9
|
+
quality_gate_required: true
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
phases:
|
|
12
|
+
- id: brief
|
|
13
|
+
name: PLG Brief
|
|
14
|
+
description: Define product, current ICP, current activation pattern, current monetisation
|
|
15
|
+
agents:
|
|
16
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
17
|
+
role: Frame product fit-for-PLG, current activation, current monetisation, runway
|
|
18
|
+
gate:
|
|
19
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
20
|
+
description: User confirms PLG context and fit assessment
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- id: model-selection
|
|
23
|
+
name: Model Selection (Freemium vs Trial)
|
|
24
|
+
description: Pick freemium vs free-trial vs reverse-trial based on product DNA + ICP + CAC math
|
|
25
|
+
agents:
|
|
26
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
27
|
+
role: Model selection with explicit trade-off table
|
|
28
|
+
- agent_id: cfo-helena
|
|
29
|
+
role: Unit economics check per model (LTV/CAC, payback)
|
|
30
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
31
|
+
gate:
|
|
32
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
33
|
+
description: User approves PLG model
|
|
34
|
+
outputs:
|
|
35
|
+
- type: document
|
|
36
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
37
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/SaaS/PLG/Model/"
|
|
38
|
+
description: Model selection rationale + economics
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
- id: activation-event
|
|
41
|
+
name: Activation Event Design
|
|
42
|
+
description: Define the activation event — the moment user gets first measurable value (Aha moment)
|
|
43
|
+
agents:
|
|
44
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
45
|
+
role: Activation event definition with measurable success criteria
|
|
46
|
+
- agent_id: product-director-carolina
|
|
47
|
+
role: User journey to activation, time-to-first-value target
|
|
48
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
49
|
+
gate:
|
|
50
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
51
|
+
description: User approves activation event definition
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
- id: onboarding-design
|
|
54
|
+
name: Onboarding Design
|
|
55
|
+
description: Onboarding flow optimised for activation — checklist, empty states, value signposts
|
|
56
|
+
agents:
|
|
57
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
58
|
+
role: Onboarding flow with friction-vs-completion trade-off explicit
|
|
59
|
+
- agent_id: ux-designer-sofia-d
|
|
60
|
+
role: UX patterns with completion target per step
|
|
61
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
62
|
+
gate:
|
|
63
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
64
|
+
description: User approves onboarding flow
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
- id: monetisation-trigger
|
|
67
|
+
name: Monetisation Trigger
|
|
68
|
+
description: When and how the user hits the paywall — usage limits, feature gates, team upgrades
|
|
69
|
+
agents:
|
|
70
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
71
|
+
role: Monetisation trigger design — value-based, not arbitrary
|
|
72
|
+
- agent_id: cfo-helena
|
|
73
|
+
role: Trigger-to-conversion math
|
|
74
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
75
|
+
gate:
|
|
76
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
77
|
+
description: User approves monetisation trigger
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
- id: expansion-mechanics
|
|
80
|
+
name: Expansion Mechanics
|
|
81
|
+
description: How accounts expand within the product — multi-seat, usage growth, feature upsell, NRR > 110% target
|
|
82
|
+
agents:
|
|
83
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
84
|
+
role: Expansion levers with NRR > 110% math
|
|
85
|
+
gate:
|
|
86
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
87
|
+
description: User approves expansion mechanics
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
- id: instrumentation
|
|
90
|
+
name: Instrumentation
|
|
91
|
+
description: Tracking events for activation, monetisation triggers, expansion — full funnel telemetry
|
|
92
|
+
agents:
|
|
93
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
94
|
+
role: Event schema with per-funnel-step tracking
|
|
95
|
+
- agent_id: tech-director-francisca
|
|
96
|
+
role: Implementation feasibility
|
|
97
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
98
|
+
gate:
|
|
99
|
+
type: auto
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
- id: self-critique
|
|
102
|
+
name: Self-Critique
|
|
103
|
+
description: Stress-test — does activation event predict retention? Does monetisation trigger feel earned? Does expansion math close?
|
|
104
|
+
agents:
|
|
105
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
106
|
+
role: PLG coherence check
|
|
107
|
+
gate:
|
|
108
|
+
type: auto
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
- id: quality-gate
|
|
111
|
+
name: Quality Gate
|
|
112
|
+
model_override: opus
|
|
113
|
+
description: Mandatory quality review
|
|
114
|
+
agents:
|
|
115
|
+
- agent_id: cqo-marta
|
|
116
|
+
role: Orchestrate quality review
|
|
117
|
+
- agent_id: copy-director-eduardo
|
|
118
|
+
role: Onboarding copy, paywall framing, no aggressive monetisation prose
|
|
119
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
120
|
+
- agent_id: tech-director-francisca
|
|
121
|
+
role: Instrumentation correctness, event schema integrity
|
|
122
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
123
|
+
gate:
|
|
124
|
+
type: quality_gate
|
|
125
|
+
required_verdict: APPROVED
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
- id: delivery
|
|
128
|
+
name: PLG Package Delivery
|
|
129
|
+
description: Compile the PLG package — model + activation + onboarding + monetisation + expansion + instrumentation
|
|
130
|
+
agents:
|
|
131
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
132
|
+
role: Full PLG package + 1-page executive summary
|
|
133
|
+
gate:
|
|
134
|
+
type: auto
|
|
135
|
+
outputs:
|
|
136
|
+
- type: document
|
|
137
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
138
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/SaaS/PLG/"
|
|
139
|
+
description: Complete PLG package — model + activation + onboarding + monetisation + expansion + instrumentation + exec summary
|
package/package.json
CHANGED