arkaos 2.50.0 → 2.52.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/VERSION +1 -1
- package/departments/landing/skills/webinar-funnel/SKILL.md +159 -6
- package/departments/landing/workflows/funnel.yaml +135 -0
- package/departments/landing/workflows/webinar.yaml +134 -0
- package/departments/saas/skills/gtm-strategy/SKILL.md +133 -7
- package/departments/saas/workflows/gtm-strategy.yaml +144 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/pyproject.toml +1 -1
package/VERSION
CHANGED
|
@@ -1 +1 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
2.
|
|
1
|
+
2.52.0
|
|
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: landing/webinar-funnel
|
|
3
3
|
description: >
|
|
4
|
-
Webinar funnel
|
|
4
|
+
Webinar funnel design — registration page, reminder sequence, live pitch
|
|
5
|
+
script structure, replay/cart sequence, conversion targets.
|
|
5
6
|
allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, Agent, WebFetch, WebSearch]
|
|
6
7
|
---
|
|
7
8
|
|
|
@@ -21,12 +22,164 @@ does not replace the vault.
|
|
|
21
22
|
|
|
22
23
|
# Webinar Funnel — `/landing webinar <topic>`
|
|
23
24
|
|
|
24
|
-
> **
|
|
25
|
+
> **Lead:** Ines (Conversion Strategist) | **Copy:** Teresa (Sales Copywriter) | **Framework:** Russell Brunson Perfect Webinar + False Belief Patterns
|
|
25
26
|
|
|
26
|
-
## What
|
|
27
|
+
## What ships
|
|
27
28
|
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
+
A production webinar funnel in 6 deliverables:
|
|
29
30
|
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
+
1. **Registration page** with hook + promise + agenda + host + social proof + CTA
|
|
32
|
+
2. **Reminder email sequence** (5 emails, registration → live)
|
|
33
|
+
3. **Live pitch script** with timing markers, false-belief teardown, offer stack
|
|
34
|
+
4. **Replay + cart sequence** (5-7 emails post-webinar)
|
|
35
|
+
5. **Conversion targets** with funnel math (registration → show-up → buy)
|
|
36
|
+
6. **Tracking spec** with pixel events and attribution windows
|
|
31
37
|
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
38
|
+
## The Perfect Webinar Frame (Brunson)
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
A converting webinar follows a strict structure. Deviating from any element measurably drops conversion.
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
```
|
|
43
|
+
TIMING BLOCK PURPOSE
|
|
44
|
+
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
45
|
+
0:00 - 0:05 Open Hook, agenda, attendance proof
|
|
46
|
+
0:05 - 0:15 Origin Story Builder credibility, stakes
|
|
47
|
+
0:15 - 0:45 Content (3 secrets) Teardown of 3 false beliefs
|
|
48
|
+
0:45 - 0:55 Transition "Here's what to do next"
|
|
49
|
+
0:55 - 1:25 Offer Stack Itemized value, anchored price
|
|
50
|
+
1:25 - 1:35 Urgency + FAQ Scarcity reason, top objections
|
|
51
|
+
1:35 - 1:50 Close + Q&A Repeated CTA, live Q&A
|
|
52
|
+
```
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
The 90-minute structure is the floor. Live webinars can run 120-180; auto-webinars compress to 60-75.
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## False Belief Patterns (the content middle)
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
The middle of the webinar exists to teardown 3 false beliefs the audience holds — about the **vehicle** (what method), the **internal** (their own capability), and the **external** (their environment / circumstances). Each teardown follows the same shape:
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
```
|
|
61
|
+
1. State the false belief plainly ("Most people think X")
|
|
62
|
+
2. Tell the origin of that belief (where it came from, why it's plausible)
|
|
63
|
+
3. Tell the story of when YOU believed it (vulnerability anchor)
|
|
64
|
+
4. Reveal the cost of that belief (specific consequence)
|
|
65
|
+
5. Introduce the new belief (what actually works)
|
|
66
|
+
6. Prove the new belief with evidence + story
|
|
67
|
+
```
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
Pick the 3 most load-bearing false beliefs your offer needs to dismantle. Pick more than 3 and the webinar bloats. Pick fewer and conversion drops.
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
## Registration Page Anatomy
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
Above the fold:
|
|
74
|
+
- **Headline** — the hook (curiosity-led specific outcome)
|
|
75
|
+
- **Sub-headline** — the timeframe + named mechanism
|
|
76
|
+
- **Date / time / format** — specific, with timezone
|
|
77
|
+
- **CTA button** — register, not "submit"
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
Below the fold:
|
|
80
|
+
- **Agenda** — 3-4 bullets teasing the 3 content blocks
|
|
81
|
+
- **Host bio** — one paragraph + photo + 3 credibility markers
|
|
82
|
+
- **Social proof** — 2-3 testimonials or registrant count
|
|
83
|
+
- **Reminder consent** — "We'll send a reminder by email/SMS"
|
|
84
|
+
- **FAQ block** — duration, replay availability, recording disclosure
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
Conversion target: **30-45%** registration rate from warm traffic, **8-15%** from cold ads.
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
## Reminder Sequence Template (5 emails)
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
| # | When | Subject style | Purpose |
|
|
91
|
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
92
|
+
| 1 | Immediately | Confirmation + calendar link | Confirm registration, add to calendar |
|
|
93
|
+
| 2 | 24h before | Value-prime story | Story-led pre-sell of the secrets to be revealed |
|
|
94
|
+
| 3 | 1h before | "Starting soon" + login link | Drive show-up |
|
|
95
|
+
| 4 | 10 min before | "We're live in 10" | Last show-up push |
|
|
96
|
+
| 5 | At start | "We're live now" | Catch the last-minute attendees |
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
Conversion target: **35-55%** show-up rate from registration. Auto-webinar shows higher (60-70%) because re-watching is built in.
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
## Live Pitch Script Structure (core deliverable)
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
The script template has fixed sections. Filling each section is the work; structure is not optional.
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
```markdown
|
|
105
|
+
# Webinar — [TOPIC]
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
## 0:00 — Open (5 min)
|
|
108
|
+
Hook line: [ONE SENTENCE WITH SPECIFIC NUMBER + TIMEFRAME]
|
|
109
|
+
Agenda: [3 BULLETS — THE 3 SECRETS]
|
|
110
|
+
Attendance proof: [WHO'S HERE / WHERE FROM]
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
## 0:05 — Origin Story (10 min)
|
|
113
|
+
- The moment everything changed
|
|
114
|
+
- What was at stake (concrete)
|
|
115
|
+
- The cost of NOT solving it
|
|
116
|
+
- The breakthrough insight
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
## 0:15 — Secret #1 [VEHICLE FALSE BELIEF] (10 min)
|
|
119
|
+
- False belief: [plain sentence]
|
|
120
|
+
- Origin of the belief: [story]
|
|
121
|
+
- When YOU believed it: [vulnerability anchor]
|
|
122
|
+
- Cost of the belief: [specific consequence]
|
|
123
|
+
- New belief: [plain sentence]
|
|
124
|
+
- Proof: [story + evidence]
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
## 0:25 — Secret #2 [INTERNAL FALSE BELIEF] (10 min)
|
|
127
|
+
(same structure)
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
## 0:35 — Secret #3 [EXTERNAL FALSE BELIEF] (10 min)
|
|
130
|
+
(same structure)
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
## 0:45 — Transition (10 min)
|
|
133
|
+
"You're now wondering: how do I actually DO this?"
|
|
134
|
+
- Three options: (1) figure it out alone (slow), (2) hire someone (expensive), (3) follow a proven system (the offer)
|
|
135
|
+
- Introduce the offer name
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
## 0:55 — Offer Stack (30 min)
|
|
138
|
+
- Component 1: [name + dream outcome + value $X]
|
|
139
|
+
- Component 2: [name + dream outcome + value $X]
|
|
140
|
+
- Component 3: [name + dream outcome + value $X]
|
|
141
|
+
- Bonus 1: [name + scarcity reason]
|
|
142
|
+
- Bonus 2: [name + scarcity reason]
|
|
143
|
+
- Total value: $X
|
|
144
|
+
- Today's price: $Y (anchored vs total)
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
## 1:25 — Urgency + FAQ (10 min)
|
|
147
|
+
Urgency reason: [scarcity / deadline / cohort cap / price increase]
|
|
148
|
+
Top objections answered: [3-5 with prepared scripts]
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
## 1:35 — Close + Live Q&A (15 min)
|
|
151
|
+
Repeat CTA + URL
|
|
152
|
+
Live Q&A with prepared questions
|
|
153
|
+
Final close at 1:50
|
|
154
|
+
```
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
## Replay + Cart Sequence (post-webinar)
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
| # | When | Subject style | Purpose |
|
|
159
|
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
160
|
+
| 1 | 1h after | "Did you miss it?" + replay | Catch no-shows |
|
|
161
|
+
| 2 | 24h | "Quick recap" + replay + CTA | Re-engage, soft pitch |
|
|
162
|
+
| 3 | 48h | Case study | Social proof, momentum |
|
|
163
|
+
| 4 | 72h | FAQ + objection-handling | De-risk |
|
|
164
|
+
| 5 | Cart-close - 24h | "Closing tomorrow" + scarcity | Urgency |
|
|
165
|
+
| 6 | Cart-close - 6h | "Closing in 6h" | Final push |
|
|
166
|
+
| 7 | Cart-close - 1h | "Closing in 1h" | Last-call |
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
Conversion target: **3-8%** of registrants buy (cold list), **8-20%** (warm list). Replay attribution is 30-50% of total revenue — don't skip it.
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
## Tracking Spec
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
Pixel events required:
|
|
173
|
+
- `Registration` — fires on registration form submit
|
|
174
|
+
- `WebinarOpen` — fires on live broadcast page load (50%+ attendance signal)
|
|
175
|
+
- `WebinarComplete` — fires at 75% watched
|
|
176
|
+
- `PitchOpen` — fires when offer URL loads from webinar
|
|
177
|
+
- `Purchase` — fires on order confirmation
|
|
178
|
+
- `ReplayOpen` — fires on replay page load
|
|
179
|
+
- `ReplayPurchase` — fires on order from replay-attributed link
|
|
180
|
+
|
|
181
|
+
Attribution window: 14 days, last-click weighted toward the live broadcast event.
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
## Output → Obsidian: `WizardingCode/Webinars/<topic>-<date>/`
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
Delivers: hook variants + registration page + 5-email reminder sequence + full pitch script + 5-7 email replay/cart sequence + conversion targets + tracking spec.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
id: landing-funnel
|
|
2
|
+
name: Funnel Architecture
|
|
3
|
+
description: Sales funnel architecture matched to audience awareness and price point — squeeze, tripwire, SLO, webinar, VSL, application
|
|
4
|
+
department: landing
|
|
5
|
+
tier: enterprise
|
|
6
|
+
command: "/landing funnel"
|
|
7
|
+
requires_branch: false
|
|
8
|
+
requires_spec: false
|
|
9
|
+
quality_gate_required: true
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
phases:
|
|
12
|
+
- id: brief
|
|
13
|
+
name: Funnel Brief
|
|
14
|
+
description: Define product, price point, audience awareness level, conversion target
|
|
15
|
+
agents:
|
|
16
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
17
|
+
role: Frame product, current traffic source, price point, current conversion baseline
|
|
18
|
+
gate:
|
|
19
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
20
|
+
description: User confirms product, price point, awareness level, conversion target
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- id: awareness-diagnosis
|
|
23
|
+
name: Awareness Diagnosis
|
|
24
|
+
description: Diagnose audience awareness level (Schwartz 5 stages) — drives funnel type selection
|
|
25
|
+
agents:
|
|
26
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
27
|
+
role: Apply Schwartz Awareness Ladder, score audience position
|
|
28
|
+
gate:
|
|
29
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
30
|
+
description: User approves awareness diagnosis before funnel-type selection
|
|
31
|
+
outputs:
|
|
32
|
+
- type: document
|
|
33
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
34
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/Funnels/Awareness/"
|
|
35
|
+
description: Awareness diagnosis with evidence per stage
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
- id: funnel-selection
|
|
38
|
+
name: Funnel Type Selection
|
|
39
|
+
description: Pick funnel type from Value Ladder matching awareness × price (squeeze / tripwire / SLO / webinar / VSL / application)
|
|
40
|
+
agents:
|
|
41
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
42
|
+
role: Apply Value Ladder + awareness-price-funnel matrix; select primary funnel
|
|
43
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
44
|
+
role: Pricing strategy fit check
|
|
45
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
46
|
+
gate:
|
|
47
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
48
|
+
description: User approves funnel-type selection with rationale
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
- id: offer-design
|
|
51
|
+
name: Offer Design
|
|
52
|
+
description: Grand Slam Offer construction (Hormozi value equation) for the funnel
|
|
53
|
+
agents:
|
|
54
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
55
|
+
role: Build offer with dream outcome × perceived likelihood / (time delay × effort)
|
|
56
|
+
gate:
|
|
57
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
58
|
+
description: User approves offer structure before page architecture
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
- id: page-architecture
|
|
61
|
+
name: Page Architecture
|
|
62
|
+
description: Map every page in the funnel — squeeze / sales / order / thank-you / upsell / downsell, plus copy framework per page
|
|
63
|
+
agents:
|
|
64
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
65
|
+
role: Define page list with role, copy framework, conversion target per page
|
|
66
|
+
- agent_id: sales-copywriter-teresa
|
|
67
|
+
role: Headline + sub-headline + lead drafts per page
|
|
68
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
69
|
+
gate:
|
|
70
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
71
|
+
description: User approves the page list and primary CTA per page
|
|
72
|
+
outputs:
|
|
73
|
+
- type: document
|
|
74
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
75
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/Funnels/Architecture/"
|
|
76
|
+
description: Page list with copy framework and conversion target per page
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
- id: email-sequences
|
|
79
|
+
name: Email Sequences
|
|
80
|
+
description: Email sequences supporting the funnel — indoctrination, cart, nurture, abandonment, post-purchase
|
|
81
|
+
agents:
|
|
82
|
+
- agent_id: sales-copywriter-teresa
|
|
83
|
+
role: Email sequence design per supporting role
|
|
84
|
+
gate:
|
|
85
|
+
type: auto
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
- id: metrics-targets
|
|
88
|
+
name: Metrics & Targets
|
|
89
|
+
description: Set conversion targets per page + funnel-level metrics (CAC, AOV, LTV, ROAS)
|
|
90
|
+
agents:
|
|
91
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
92
|
+
role: Compute conversion baseline + targets, funnel economics
|
|
93
|
+
gate:
|
|
94
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
95
|
+
description: User approves the funnel metrics targets
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
- id: self-critique
|
|
98
|
+
name: Self-Critique
|
|
99
|
+
description: Stress-test the funnel — does awareness match offer match price match traffic source?
|
|
100
|
+
agents:
|
|
101
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
102
|
+
role: Coherence check across all funnel elements
|
|
103
|
+
gate:
|
|
104
|
+
type: auto
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
- id: quality-gate
|
|
107
|
+
name: Quality Gate
|
|
108
|
+
model_override: opus
|
|
109
|
+
description: Mandatory quality review
|
|
110
|
+
agents:
|
|
111
|
+
- agent_id: cqo-marta
|
|
112
|
+
role: Orchestrate quality review
|
|
113
|
+
- agent_id: copy-director-eduardo
|
|
114
|
+
role: Sales copy quality, awareness-match prose, no clichés
|
|
115
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
116
|
+
- agent_id: tech-director-francisca
|
|
117
|
+
role: Page count + metrics target feasibility + tracking integrity
|
|
118
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
119
|
+
gate:
|
|
120
|
+
type: quality_gate
|
|
121
|
+
required_verdict: APPROVED
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
- id: delivery
|
|
124
|
+
name: Funnel Package Delivery
|
|
125
|
+
description: Compile the funnel package — pages + copy + emails + metrics targets
|
|
126
|
+
agents:
|
|
127
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
128
|
+
role: Full funnel package compilation
|
|
129
|
+
gate:
|
|
130
|
+
type: auto
|
|
131
|
+
outputs:
|
|
132
|
+
- type: document
|
|
133
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
134
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/Funnels/"
|
|
135
|
+
description: Complete funnel package — awareness diagnosis + offer + page architecture + email sequences + metrics targets
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
id: landing-webinar
|
|
2
|
+
name: Webinar Funnel
|
|
3
|
+
description: Webinar funnel — registration page, reminder sequence, live pitch script, replay sequence, indoctrination + cart sequences
|
|
4
|
+
department: landing
|
|
5
|
+
tier: enterprise
|
|
6
|
+
command: "/landing webinar"
|
|
7
|
+
requires_branch: false
|
|
8
|
+
requires_spec: false
|
|
9
|
+
quality_gate_required: true
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
phases:
|
|
12
|
+
- id: brief
|
|
13
|
+
name: Webinar Brief
|
|
14
|
+
description: Define topic, target avatar, live vs evergreen, sale price, dates
|
|
15
|
+
agents:
|
|
16
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
17
|
+
role: Frame topic, audience, format (live / auto / hybrid), sale price, broadcast dates
|
|
18
|
+
gate:
|
|
19
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
20
|
+
description: User confirms topic, format, sale price, and dates
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- id: hook-design
|
|
23
|
+
name: Hook & Promise
|
|
24
|
+
description: Design the webinar hook (one-time deal, secret framework, mistake list) and the core promise
|
|
25
|
+
agents:
|
|
26
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
27
|
+
role: Hook variants (3-5), core promise statement, false-belief frames (3)
|
|
28
|
+
gate:
|
|
29
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
30
|
+
description: User approves hook and core promise
|
|
31
|
+
outputs:
|
|
32
|
+
- type: document
|
|
33
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
34
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/Webinars/Hooks/"
|
|
35
|
+
description: Hook variants + core promise + false-belief frames
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
- id: registration-page
|
|
38
|
+
name: Registration Page
|
|
39
|
+
description: Registration page design — hook, promise, agenda, host bio, social proof, CTA
|
|
40
|
+
agents:
|
|
41
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
42
|
+
role: Page wireframe with conversion target
|
|
43
|
+
- agent_id: sales-copywriter-teresa
|
|
44
|
+
role: Headline + sub-headline + agenda copy + host bio + CTA copy
|
|
45
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
46
|
+
gate:
|
|
47
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
48
|
+
description: User approves the registration page before email sequence build
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
- id: reminder-sequence
|
|
51
|
+
name: Reminder Sequence
|
|
52
|
+
description: Email sequence before the webinar — confirmation, value-prime, day-before, hour-before, last-call
|
|
53
|
+
agents:
|
|
54
|
+
- agent_id: sales-copywriter-teresa
|
|
55
|
+
role: 5-email reminder sequence with show-up rate target
|
|
56
|
+
gate:
|
|
57
|
+
type: auto
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
- id: live-script
|
|
60
|
+
name: Live Pitch Script
|
|
61
|
+
description: Webinar script — open, content (3-5 modules), pitch transition, offer, FAQ, close
|
|
62
|
+
agents:
|
|
63
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
64
|
+
role: Script structure with timing, false-belief teardown, offer stack, urgency, FAQ
|
|
65
|
+
- agent_id: sales-copywriter-teresa
|
|
66
|
+
role: Script copy with stories, transitions, CTAs
|
|
67
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
68
|
+
gate:
|
|
69
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
70
|
+
description: User approves script structure before replay sequence
|
|
71
|
+
outputs:
|
|
72
|
+
- type: document
|
|
73
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
74
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/Webinars/Scripts/"
|
|
75
|
+
description: Live pitch script with timing markers
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
- id: replay-sequence
|
|
78
|
+
name: Replay & Cart Sequence
|
|
79
|
+
description: Post-webinar email sequence — replay availability, encore, cart-open, cart-close, last-chance
|
|
80
|
+
agents:
|
|
81
|
+
- agent_id: sales-copywriter-teresa
|
|
82
|
+
role: 5-7 email post-webinar sequence with cart-close target
|
|
83
|
+
gate:
|
|
84
|
+
type: auto
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
- id: metrics-targets
|
|
87
|
+
name: Conversion Targets
|
|
88
|
+
description: Set registration → show-up → buy targets, plus replay attribution
|
|
89
|
+
agents:
|
|
90
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
91
|
+
role: Funnel math — registration rate, show-up rate, buy rate, CAC, LTV
|
|
92
|
+
gate:
|
|
93
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
94
|
+
description: User approves the conversion targets
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
- id: self-critique
|
|
97
|
+
name: Self-Critique
|
|
98
|
+
description: Stress-test the webinar — does hook match promise match script match offer?
|
|
99
|
+
agents:
|
|
100
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
101
|
+
role: Coherence check across all webinar elements
|
|
102
|
+
gate:
|
|
103
|
+
type: auto
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
- id: quality-gate
|
|
106
|
+
name: Quality Gate
|
|
107
|
+
model_override: opus
|
|
108
|
+
description: Mandatory quality review
|
|
109
|
+
agents:
|
|
110
|
+
- agent_id: cqo-marta
|
|
111
|
+
role: Orchestrate quality review
|
|
112
|
+
- agent_id: copy-director-eduardo
|
|
113
|
+
role: Script + email copy quality, no clichés, no over-promise
|
|
114
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
115
|
+
- agent_id: tech-director-francisca
|
|
116
|
+
role: Funnel mechanics integrity, tracking, evergreen-vs-live config correctness
|
|
117
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
118
|
+
gate:
|
|
119
|
+
type: quality_gate
|
|
120
|
+
required_verdict: APPROVED
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
- id: delivery
|
|
123
|
+
name: Webinar Package Delivery
|
|
124
|
+
description: Compile the full webinar package
|
|
125
|
+
agents:
|
|
126
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
127
|
+
role: Full webinar package compilation
|
|
128
|
+
gate:
|
|
129
|
+
type: auto
|
|
130
|
+
outputs:
|
|
131
|
+
- type: document
|
|
132
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
133
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/Webinars/"
|
|
134
|
+
description: Complete webinar package — hook + registration page + reminder sequence + script + replay sequence + conversion targets
|
|
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: saas/gtm-strategy
|
|
3
3
|
description: >
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
4
|
+
Cross-departmental go-to-market strategy: ICP, positioning, motion selection,
|
|
5
|
+
channel mix, 90-day execution plan. Orchestrates SaaS + Strategy + Marketing
|
|
6
|
+
+ Sales + Landing.
|
|
5
7
|
allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, Agent, WebFetch, WebSearch]
|
|
6
8
|
---
|
|
7
9
|
|
|
@@ -19,14 +21,138 @@ treat them as your default source. External research supplements, it
|
|
|
19
21
|
does not replace the vault.
|
|
20
22
|
<!-- arka:kb-first-prefix end -->
|
|
21
23
|
|
|
22
|
-
#
|
|
24
|
+
# GTM Strategy — `/saas gtm <product>`
|
|
23
25
|
|
|
24
|
-
> **
|
|
26
|
+
> **Lead:** Tiago (SaaS Strategist) | **Cross-dept:** Tomas (Strategy) + Mateus (Brand) + Luna (Marketing) + Miguel (Sales) + Ines (Landing) | **Framework:** MOVE (Sangram Vajre) + Onlyness + AARRR
|
|
25
27
|
|
|
26
|
-
## What
|
|
28
|
+
## What ships
|
|
27
29
|
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
30
|
+
A production GTM package in 6 deliverables, each with a named owner and a measurable target:
|
|
29
31
|
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
32
|
+
1. **ICP profile** — firmographics + persona + pain triggers + buying signal
|
|
33
|
+
2. **Positioning statement** — Onlyness frame + competitive contrast table
|
|
34
|
+
3. **Motion selection** — primary + assist motion with feasibility math
|
|
35
|
+
4. **Channel mix** — budget allocation across channels with AARRR baseline
|
|
36
|
+
5. **90-day execution plan** — week-by-week with owners + checkpoints
|
|
37
|
+
6. **Executive summary** — 1-page printable to align stakeholders
|
|
31
38
|
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
39
|
+
## ICP Template (firmographic + persona + pain + signal)
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
Every ICP profile must carry these four blocks. Vagueness in any block invalidates the rest of the GTM stack.
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
### Firmographics (the company shape)
|
|
44
|
+
- Company size (employees, ARR range)
|
|
45
|
+
- Industry vertical (with NAICS / SIC code if relevant)
|
|
46
|
+
- Geo (countries, regulatory regions)
|
|
47
|
+
- Tech stack signal (what they already pay for that signals readiness)
|
|
48
|
+
- Funding stage (bootstrapped / seed / Series A+ / public)
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
### Persona (the human inside the company)
|
|
51
|
+
- Title and seniority
|
|
52
|
+
- Primary KPI they own
|
|
53
|
+
- Tools they use daily
|
|
54
|
+
- Information diet (newsletters, podcasts, communities)
|
|
55
|
+
- Decision authority (sole / committee / approval)
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
### Pain Triggers (the moment they realise they need this)
|
|
58
|
+
- The specific event that surfaces the pain (new hire, missed quarter, audit, regulation change)
|
|
59
|
+
- The cost of not solving it (revenue at risk, hours wasted, compliance exposure)
|
|
60
|
+
- The status quo workaround (Excel, agencies, internal builds)
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
### Buying Signal (how you find them in the wild)
|
|
63
|
+
- Observable behavior in the open web (job postings with specific keywords, tool reviews, talks at specific conferences)
|
|
64
|
+
- Account-level data signal (vendor footprint, hiring pattern, public infrastructure)
|
|
65
|
+
- Conversational signal (specific Slack/Discord communities, specific subreddits)
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
## Onlyness Statement (positioning frame)
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
The Onlyness frame forces a single defensible sentence:
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
> **We are the only [category] that [unique mechanism] for [ICP] who want [outcome].**
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
Worked example:
|
|
74
|
+
> "We are the only AI agent orchestration system that ships behavioral compliance telemetry baked into the runtime for technical founders who want measurable governance instead of vibes-based discipline."
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
The statement must pass three tests:
|
|
77
|
+
1. **Substitution test** — replace your name with a competitor's. Does the sentence still hold? If yes, the positioning isn't defensible.
|
|
78
|
+
2. **Customer-articulation test** — would a current customer say this sentence back unprompted in roughly these words?
|
|
79
|
+
3. **Mechanism test** — is "unique mechanism" a verifiable specific (a feature, a method, a metric) or marketing prose (an adjective, a vibe)?
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
## 6 GTM Motions (pick primary + assist)
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
Each motion has a default ICP shape and a default channel mix. Mixing motions without understanding the constraints below produces zero-momentum GTM.
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
| Motion | Default ICP | Default Channels | Velocity | Typical CAC payback |
|
|
86
|
+
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
87
|
+
| **Product-Led (PLG)** | High-volume, low-ticket, self-serve adoption pattern | SEO + integrations + viral loops + product itself | Fast (weeks to first value) | 6-12 months |
|
|
88
|
+
| **Sales-Led (SLG)** | Enterprise, committee buying, regulated industries | Outbound + content + events + partner channel | Slow (months to close) | 12-18 months |
|
|
89
|
+
| **Community-Led** | High-affinity practitioners, identity-driven adoption | Owned community + open source + advocate program | Medium (compounds quarterly) | Variable (community creates own loop) |
|
|
90
|
+
| **Partner-Led** | Vertical specialists, complex installs, system integrator channel | Channel partnerships + reseller program + co-marketing | Slow start, faster scale | 9-18 months |
|
|
91
|
+
| **Inbound** | Information-seeking buyers researching solutions | SEO + content marketing + comparison content + reviews | Medium (3-6 month ramp) | 6-12 months |
|
|
92
|
+
| **Outbound** | Identified buyer set, account-based targeting | Cold email + cold call + LinkedIn + ABM | Fast pipeline, slow trust | 12-24 months |
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
The MOVE framework (Sangram Vajre): **M**arkets (who you're selling into), **O**perations (your repeatable engine), **V**elocity (deal cycle + expansion math), **E**xpansion (NRR > 110% target).
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
## Channel-Motion Matrix
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
```
|
|
99
|
+
Content/SEO Paid Community Partner Event Outbound
|
|
100
|
+
Product-Led ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓ ✓ —
|
|
101
|
+
Sales-Led ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓
|
|
102
|
+
Community-Led ✓✓✓ — ✓✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ —
|
|
103
|
+
Partner-Led ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓
|
|
104
|
+
Inbound ✓✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ ✓✓ —
|
|
105
|
+
Outbound ✓✓ ✓ ✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓✓
|
|
106
|
+
```
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
Pick exactly ONE primary channel that gets 50%+ of budget. Add at most TWO assist channels. More channels = no channel.
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
## 90-Day Execution Plan Template
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
Plan structure (every plan must follow this shape):
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
```
|
|
115
|
+
Week 1-2: Foundation
|
|
116
|
+
- [Owner] ICP doc validated with 5 customer conversations
|
|
117
|
+
- [Owner] Positioning statement live on homepage
|
|
118
|
+
- [Owner] Tracking baseline measured (current AARRR rates)
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
Week 3-4: Channel Activation (primary)
|
|
121
|
+
- [Owner] First 4 [channel-native content units] published
|
|
122
|
+
- [Owner] Conversion tracking live, first signals captured
|
|
123
|
+
- [Owner] Sales playbook v1 written for inbound responses
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
Week 5-8: Iteration
|
|
126
|
+
- [Owner] Top-funnel CAC measured, channel ROI computed
|
|
127
|
+
- [Owner] Pricing test A/B started
|
|
128
|
+
- [Owner] First 10 customer interviews completed and tagged
|
|
129
|
+
- [Owner] Assist channels activated based on primary signal
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
Week 9-12: Scale Decision
|
|
132
|
+
- [Owner] Channel-mix review — double down or pivot
|
|
133
|
+
- [Owner] First retention cohort analysis (D7, D30)
|
|
134
|
+
- [Owner] Next-90-day plan written based on real data
|
|
135
|
+
```
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
Every line must have: owner name, measurable output, due date.
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
## Executive Summary (1-page, mandatory output)
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
The full GTM package is dense. The 1-page exec summary captures:
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
```
|
|
144
|
+
Product: [name]
|
|
145
|
+
ICP: [one sentence: who, where, what pain]
|
|
146
|
+
Positioning: [Onlyness sentence]
|
|
147
|
+
Primary Motion: [name + why this one]
|
|
148
|
+
Primary Channel: [name + 90-day budget]
|
|
149
|
+
North Star Metric: [the one number that, if it moves, the strategy works]
|
|
150
|
+
Day-90 Target: [specific number tied to North Star Metric]
|
|
151
|
+
Top Risk: [what would invalidate this strategy + mitigation]
|
|
152
|
+
```
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
If the executive summary doesn't fit on one printable page, the strategy is overcomplicated.
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
## Output → Obsidian: `WizardingCode/GTM/<product>-<date>/`
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
Delivers: ICP profile + positioning statement + motion selection + channel mix + 90-day plan + executive summary. Plus the cross-departmental review trail (Strategy + Brand + Marketing + Sales + Landing signatures from each phase gate).
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
id: saas-gtm-strategy
|
|
2
|
+
name: GTM Strategy (Cross-Departmental)
|
|
3
|
+
description: Full go-to-market strategy from ICP to 90-day execution plan, orchestrating SaaS + Strategy + Marketing + Sales + Landing
|
|
4
|
+
department: saas
|
|
5
|
+
tier: enterprise
|
|
6
|
+
command: "/saas gtm"
|
|
7
|
+
requires_branch: false
|
|
8
|
+
requires_spec: false
|
|
9
|
+
quality_gate_required: true
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
phases:
|
|
12
|
+
- id: brief
|
|
13
|
+
name: GTM Brief
|
|
14
|
+
description: Define product, current stage, available budget/runway, and success metric
|
|
15
|
+
agents:
|
|
16
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
17
|
+
role: Frame product context, current ARR/MRR, runway, win condition for the launch
|
|
18
|
+
gate:
|
|
19
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
20
|
+
description: User confirms product context, budget, and success metric
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- id: icp-discovery
|
|
23
|
+
name: ICP Discovery
|
|
24
|
+
description: Define Ideal Customer Profile from existing user data and competitor analysis
|
|
25
|
+
agents:
|
|
26
|
+
- agent_id: strategy-director-tomas
|
|
27
|
+
role: ICP framework — firmographics, technographics, pain triggers, buying committee
|
|
28
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
29
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
30
|
+
role: Current-user pattern extraction, look-alike modeling, willingness-to-pay signals
|
|
31
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
32
|
+
gate:
|
|
33
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
34
|
+
description: User approves the ICP (firmographics + persona + pain triggers + buying signal)
|
|
35
|
+
outputs:
|
|
36
|
+
- type: document
|
|
37
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
38
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/GTM/ICP/"
|
|
39
|
+
description: ICP profile with persona card, pain triggers, buying signals
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
- id: positioning
|
|
42
|
+
name: Positioning Statement
|
|
43
|
+
description: Position the product in the ICP's mental category using Ries/Trout template + Onlyness frame
|
|
44
|
+
agents:
|
|
45
|
+
- agent_id: brand-strategist-mateus
|
|
46
|
+
role: Onlyness statement (only X that Y for Z), category creation vs category capture analysis
|
|
47
|
+
- agent_id: strategy-director-tomas
|
|
48
|
+
role: Competitive contrast — 3-5 direct competitors with relative positioning
|
|
49
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
50
|
+
gate:
|
|
51
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
52
|
+
description: User approves positioning (one-sentence + competitive contrast)
|
|
53
|
+
outputs:
|
|
54
|
+
- type: document
|
|
55
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
56
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/GTM/Positioning/"
|
|
57
|
+
description: Positioning statement + competitive contrast table
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
- id: motion-selection
|
|
60
|
+
name: GTM Motion Selection
|
|
61
|
+
description: Pick the primary motion (PLG / SLG / community / partner / inbound / outbound) and the assist motion
|
|
62
|
+
agents:
|
|
63
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
64
|
+
role: Apply Sangram Vajre's MOVE framework — Markets, Operations, Velocity, Expansion
|
|
65
|
+
- agent_id: sales-director-miguel
|
|
66
|
+
role: Sales motion feasibility — pipeline math, CAC payback, win-rate baseline
|
|
67
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
68
|
+
gate:
|
|
69
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
70
|
+
description: User approves primary motion + assist motion + 90-day target velocity
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
- id: channel-mix
|
|
73
|
+
name: Channel Mix
|
|
74
|
+
description: Map motion to channels — content / paid / community / partnerships / events / outbound — with budget allocation
|
|
75
|
+
agents:
|
|
76
|
+
- agent_id: marketing-director-luna
|
|
77
|
+
role: Channel mix design with AARRR baseline, growth loop selection
|
|
78
|
+
- agent_id: conversion-strategist-ines
|
|
79
|
+
role: Landing surface design per channel (one URL per channel intent)
|
|
80
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
81
|
+
gate:
|
|
82
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
83
|
+
description: User approves channel allocation and budget split
|
|
84
|
+
outputs:
|
|
85
|
+
- type: document
|
|
86
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
87
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/GTM/Channels/"
|
|
88
|
+
description: Channel mix with budget allocation and AARRR baseline
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
- id: ninety-day-plan
|
|
91
|
+
name: 90-Day Execution Plan
|
|
92
|
+
description: Concrete week-by-week deliverables, owners, success metrics — first 90 days
|
|
93
|
+
agents:
|
|
94
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
95
|
+
role: Week-by-week deliverable plan with named owners and weekly checkpoints
|
|
96
|
+
- agent_id: marketing-director-luna
|
|
97
|
+
role: Marketing-side deliverables (content cadence, paid ramp, community)
|
|
98
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
99
|
+
- agent_id: sales-director-miguel
|
|
100
|
+
role: Sales-side deliverables (outbound cadence, demo book rate target)
|
|
101
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
102
|
+
gate:
|
|
103
|
+
type: user_approval
|
|
104
|
+
description: User approves the 90-day plan before Quality Gate
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
- id: self-critique
|
|
107
|
+
name: Self-Critique
|
|
108
|
+
description: Stress-test the plan — is the motion-channel-budget triple internally consistent? Are weekly checkpoints measurable?
|
|
109
|
+
agents:
|
|
110
|
+
- agent_id: strategy-director-tomas
|
|
111
|
+
role: Strategic coherence check — motion ↔ ICP ↔ positioning ↔ channels alignment
|
|
112
|
+
gate:
|
|
113
|
+
type: auto
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
- id: quality-gate
|
|
116
|
+
name: Quality Gate
|
|
117
|
+
model_override: opus
|
|
118
|
+
description: Mandatory quality review
|
|
119
|
+
agents:
|
|
120
|
+
- agent_id: cqo-marta
|
|
121
|
+
role: Orchestrate quality review
|
|
122
|
+
- agent_id: copy-director-eduardo
|
|
123
|
+
role: ICP language, positioning prose, plan readability — no clichés
|
|
124
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
125
|
+
- agent_id: tech-director-francisca
|
|
126
|
+
role: Plan executability — every action has an owner, a date, a metric
|
|
127
|
+
parallel: true
|
|
128
|
+
gate:
|
|
129
|
+
type: quality_gate
|
|
130
|
+
required_verdict: APPROVED
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
- id: delivery
|
|
133
|
+
name: GTM Package Delivery
|
|
134
|
+
description: Compile the full GTM package and produce the 1-page executive summary
|
|
135
|
+
agents:
|
|
136
|
+
- agent_id: saas-strategist-tiago
|
|
137
|
+
role: Full GTM package compilation + 1-page executive summary
|
|
138
|
+
gate:
|
|
139
|
+
type: auto
|
|
140
|
+
outputs:
|
|
141
|
+
- type: document
|
|
142
|
+
format: markdown
|
|
143
|
+
obsidian_path: "WizardingCode/GTM/"
|
|
144
|
+
description: Complete GTM package — ICP + positioning + motion + channel mix + 90-day plan + executive summary
|
package/package.json
CHANGED