arkaos 2.2.2 → 2.3.1

package/VERSION

@@ -1 +1 @@
-2.2.2
+2.3.1

package/arka/skills/conclave/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+---
+name: arka-conclave
+description: >
+  The Conclave — Personal AI Advisory Board. 20 real-world advisor personas
+  matched to your behavioral DNA. 5 aligned (think like you) + 5 contrarian
+  (challenge your blind spots). Profiling via 17 structured questions.
+allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Agent, AskUserQuestion]
+---
+
+# The Conclave — `/arka conclave`
+
+> Your personal board of AI advisors. Each one based on a real person,
+> with codified mental models, thinking styles, and decision frameworks.
+
+## Commands
+
+| Command | Description |
+|---------|-------------|
+| `/arka conclave` | Start profiling (first time) or view your board |
+| `/arka conclave profile` | Re-run the 17-question DNA profiling |
+| `/arka conclave view` | Display your current advisory board |
+| `/arka conclave ask "<question>"` | Ask all 10 advisors a question |
+| `/arka conclave advisor <name>` | Deep dive on one advisor's mental models |
+| `/arka conclave debate "<topic>"` | Watch your advisors debate a topic |
+| `/arka conclave aligned` | Show only your 5 aligned advisors |
+| `/arka conclave contrarian` | Show only your 5 contrarian advisors |
+
+## First Run: DNA Profiling
+
+When the user runs `/arka conclave` for the first time (no profile exists):
+
+### Step 1: Welcome
+```
+Welcome to The Conclave — your personal AI advisory board.
+
+I'll ask you 17 questions to understand how you think, decide, and lead.
+This takes about 5 minutes. Your answers determine which advisors match
+your thinking style and which ones will challenge your blind spots.
+
+Ready? Let's begin.
+```
+
+### Step 2: Ask Questions (one at a time)
+
+Use AskUserQuestion tool for each question. Present the options clearly.
+Group by framework with brief context:
+
+**Questions 1-4: How you ACT (DISC)**
+- These reveal your behavioral style in work situations
+
+**Questions 5-8: What DRIVES you (Enneagram)**
+- These reveal your core motivations and fears
+
+**Questions 9-13: Your TRAITS (Big Five)**
+- These reveal your personality on 5 continuous scales
+
+**Questions 14-17: How you THINK (MBTI)**
+- These reveal how you process information and decide
+
+### Step 3: Score and Build Profile
+
+After all 17 answers:
+
+1. Load `core.conclave.profiler` module
+2. Create `ProfilingSession`, process each answer
+3. Call `build_profile_from_session()` to get `UserProfile`
+4. Call `match_advisors()` to assemble the board
+5. Save profile to `~/.arkaos/conclave-profile.json`
+
+### Step 4: Present the Board
+
+Display the board using this format:
+
+```markdown
+## Your Behavioral DNA
+
+| Framework | Result | Meaning |
+|-----------|--------|---------|
+| DISC | D+C (Driver-Analyst) | Direct, data-driven, results-focused |
+| Enneagram | 5w6 (The Investigator) | Seeks competence, fears being incapable |
+| Big Five | O:78 C:85 E:35 A:40 N:25 | Curious, disciplined, introverted, direct, calm |
+| MBTI | INTJ (The Architect) | Strategic vision + efficient execution |
+
+## Your Advisory Board
+
+### ALIGNED — Think Like You (amplify your strengths)
+
+**1. Charlie Munger** — Vice Chairman, Berkshire Hathaway
+   Match: 96% | DNA: C+D, 5w6, ISTJ
+   Models: Inversion, Latticework, Circle of Competence
+   "What's the downside? Am I treating the symptom or the disease?"
+
+**2. Ray Dalio** — Founder, Bridgewater Associates
+   Match: 94% | DNA: D+C, 5w6, INTJ
+   Models: Principles-Based Decisions, Radical Transparency
+   "What is the principle? Is this based on data or opinion?"
+
+[... 3 more aligned ...]
+
+### CONTRARIAN — Challenge Your Blind Spots
+
+**1. Simon Sinek** — Author, Start With Why
+   Match: 35% | DNA: I+S, 2w1, ENFJ
+   Challenge: You focus on WHAT and HOW. Simon forces you to ask WHY.
+   "What's the WHY? Will people follow because they want to?"
+
+**2. Brene Brown** — Research Professor
+   Match: 38% | DNA: I+S, 4w3, ENFP
+   Challenge: You value control and competence. Brene values vulnerability.
+   "Am I being brave enough to be vulnerable?"
+
+[... 3 more contrarian ...]
+```
+
+## Ask Command: `/arka conclave ask "<question>"`
+
+When the user asks a question to the board:
+
+1. Load the saved ConclaveBoard
+2. For each of the 10 advisors, generate a response **in character**:
+   - Use the advisor's communication style
+   - Apply their mental models to the question
+   - Ask their key questions
+   - Keep each response to 3-5 sentences
+3. Present aligned responses first, then contrarian
+4. End with a synthesis: "Where they agree, where they disagree, and what you should consider"
+
+### Advisor Response Template
+
+For each advisor, use this system prompt approach:
+
+```
+You are {name}, {title}. You think using these mental models:
+{mental_models}
+
+Your communication style: {communication_style}
+Your decision framework: {decision_framework}
+
+When asked a question, respond in 3-5 sentences as {name} would.
+Use your mental models. Ask your key questions. Be specific to THIS situation.
+Do NOT be generic. Channel {name}'s actual thinking.
+```
+
+## Advisor Deep Dive: `/arka conclave advisor <name>`
+
+Show the full advisor profile:
+- Behavioral DNA (all 4 frameworks)
+- All mental models with descriptions and key questions
+- Communication style
+- Decision framework
+- Sources (books, talks)
+- Why they were matched (aligned or contrarian, score, dimension comparison)
+
+## Debate: `/arka conclave debate "<topic>"`
+
+1. Present the topic to all 10 advisors
+2. Each advisor gives their 2-3 sentence take
+3. Identify disagreements between aligned and contrarian groups
+4. Present the debate as a structured discussion:
+   - Opening positions (each advisor)
+   - Key disagreements (which advisors clash and why)
+   - Synthesis (what the user should take from both sides)
+
+## Profile Persistence
+
+- Save: `~/.arkaos/conclave-profile.json`
+- Contains: UserProfile (DNA) + ConclaveBoard (matched advisors)
+- Re-profile: `/arka conclave profile` overwrites existing
+- Profile is loaded automatically on subsequent `/arka conclave` calls
+
+## The 20 Advisors
+
+| # | Name | DNA | Specialty |
+|---|------|-----|-----------|
+| 1 | Charlie Munger | C+D, 5w6, ISTJ | Inversion, mental models, competence |
+| 2 | Ray Dalio | D+C, 5w6, INTJ | Principles, transparency, systems |
+| 3 | Naval Ravikant | C+D, 5w6, INTP | Leverage, specific knowledge, first principles |
+| 4 | Elon Musk | D+C, 8w7, INTJ | First principles (physics), 10x thinking |
+| 5 | Steve Jobs | D+I, 3w4, ENTJ | Simplicity, taste, A-players |
+| 6 | Simon Sinek | I+S, 2w1, ENFJ | Golden Circle, purpose, infinite game |
+| 7 | Brene Brown | I+S, 4w3, ENFP | Vulnerability, courage, shame resilience |
+| 8 | Peter Drucker | C+S, 1w9, INTJ | Effectiveness, MBO, knowledge workers |
+| 9 | Jeff Bezos | D+C, 3w2, ENTJ | Day 1, working backwards, two-way doors |
+| 10 | Derek Sivers | S+C, 9w1, INFP | Hell Yeah or No, opposites, simplicity |
+| 11 | Nassim Taleb | D+C, 8w7, INTJ | Antifragility, barbell, skin in the game |
+| 12 | Seth Godin | I+C, 7w6, ENFP | Purple Cow, permission, smallest audience |
+| 13 | Patrick Lencioni | I+S, 2w1, ENFJ | Five Dysfunctions, trust, healthy conflict |
+| 14 | Warren Buffett | S+C, 5w6, ISTJ | Circle of competence, margin of safety, moats |
+| 15 | Reed Hastings | D+I, 7w8, ENTJ | Talent density, freedom, context not control |
+| 16 | Marty Cagan | C+I, 1w2, INTJ | Empowered teams, discovery before delivery |
+| 17 | Alex Hormozi | D+C, 8w7, ENTJ | Value equation, Grand Slam Offer, Core Four |
+| 18 | April Dunford | C+I, 5w6, INTP | Positioning, 5 components, Obviously Awesome |
+| 19 | James Clear | S+C, 1w9, INFJ | Atomic Habits, systems over goals, 1% better |
+| 20 | Tim Ferriss | D+I, 7w8, ENTP | Fear-setting, 80/20, minimum effective dose |

package/arka/skills/human-writing/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+---
+name: arka-human-writing
+description: >
+  NON-NEGOTIABLE core writing quality gate. Enforces human-like writing across ALL ArkaOS output.
+  Every text, copy, report, documentation, email, social post, and analysis must follow these rules.
+  Reviewed by Eduardo (Copy Director, Tier 0). Constitution rule #8.
+  No AI-sounding patterns. Natural language with proper punctuation, tone matching, and flawless
+  orthography. Applied automatically to all departments, all agents, all output types.
+  This is a Constitution rule (NON-NEGOTIABLE #8) — violation aborts the operation.
+---
+
+# Human Writing Standard — ARKA OS Core Skill
+
+All text produced by ARKA OS must read as if written by a skilled human professional. This is not a guideline; it is a NON-NEGOTIABLE rule enforced by the Constitution.
+
+## Scope
+
+This skill applies to **every agent**, **every department**, and **every output type**:
+- Obsidian documents (reports, analyses, specs, ADRs)
+- Terminal responses and summaries
+- Social media posts, captions, stories
+- Email drafts and templates
+- Blog articles and landing page copy
+- Code comments and commit messages
+- PR descriptions and documentation
+- Client-facing deliverables
+
+## Rules
+
+### 1. No Dashes as Sentence Connectors
+
+Never use em-dashes (—), en-dashes (–), or hyphens (-) to join clauses or as sentence connectors. Use commas, semicolons, colons, periods, or conjunctions instead.
+
+**Allowed exceptions:**
+- Compound adjectives: "well-known", "open-source", "pre-commit"
+- Technical terms: "CI/CD", "key-value", "x-axis"
+- Numeric ranges: "2024-2025", "pages 10-15"
+
+| Bad | Good |
+|-----|------|
+| The system is fast — it handles 10k requests/s | The system is fast. It handles 10k requests per second. |
+| We need three things — speed, reliability, and cost | We need three things: speed, reliability, and cost. |
+| The API failed — the token had expired | The API failed because the token had expired. |
+| Users can choose dark mode — or stay with light | Users can choose dark mode, or stay with light. |
+
+### 2. Language Tone and Idioms
+
+Match the target language's natural register and idiomatic expressions. Never produce translated-sounding text.
+
+**Portuguese:** Use Portuguese idioms, sentence rhythm, and phrasing. Do not translate English constructs literally.
+
+| Bad (translated English) | Good (natural Portuguese) |
+|--------------------------|---------------------------|
+| "Isso é um jogo-mudador" | "Isto muda completamente o panorama" |
+| "No fim do dia" (literal) | "Em última análise" / "Na prática" |
+| "Nós estamos excitados para anunciar" | "Temos o prazer de anunciar" |
+
+**English:** Use natural English rhythm. Avoid overly formal or stiff constructions when the context is conversational.
+
+### 3. Perfect Accentuation and Spelling
+
+Zero tolerance for orthographic errors. Every accent, cedilla, tilde, and diacritic must be correct.
+
+**Portuguese examples:**
+- ação (not acção or acao)
+- é, está, será (accents on stressed syllables)
+- informação, coração, posição (ção endings)
+- três, através, português (circumflex and acute)
+- começar, preço, serviço (cedilla)
+
+**General:** When uncertain about spelling in any language, verify before outputting. An orthographic error in a client deliverable damages credibility.
+
+### 4. Varied Sentence Structure
+
+Mix short and long sentences. Avoid starting consecutive sentences with the same word. Use transitions naturally, not as formulaic connectors.
+
+| Bad (repetitive) | Good (varied) |
+|-------------------|---------------|
+| "The API supports pagination. The API also supports filtering. The API returns JSON." | "The API supports pagination and filtering, returning results as JSON." |
+| "We analyzed the data. We found three patterns. We recommend action." | "Our analysis revealed three patterns. Based on these findings, we recommend immediate action." |
+
+### 5. Forbidden AI Patterns
+
+These phrases and words signal AI-generated text. Never use them:
+
+**Forbidden phrases:**
+- "Let's dive in" / "Let's explore"
+- "Here's a breakdown" / "Here's what you need to know"
+- "In conclusion" / "To summarize"
+- "It's worth noting" / "It's important to note"
+- "At the end of the day"
+- "Moving forward"
+- "That being said"
+- "Without further ado"
+- "Game-changer"
+- "Take it to the next level"
+- "Unlock the potential"
+- "In today's fast-paced world"
+
+**Forbidden words (use alternatives):**
+| Forbidden | Use Instead |
+|-----------|-------------|
+| leverage | use, apply, build on |
+| utilize | use |
+| streamline | simplify, speed up, reduce steps |
+| robust | reliable, solid, thorough |
+| seamless | smooth, effortless, uninterrupted |
+| cutting-edge | modern, current, recent |
+| empower | enable, support, give tools |
+| synergy | collaboration, combined effect |
+| holistic | complete, full, comprehensive |
+| actionable insights | practical recommendations |
+
+### 6. Concrete Over Abstract
+
+Prefer specific facts, numbers, and examples over vague qualitative statements.
+
+| Bad (vague) | Good (concrete) |
+|-------------|-----------------|
+| "Significantly improved performance" | "Reduced page load from 3.2s to 0.8s" |
+| "Many users reported issues" | "47 users reported login failures in the last 24 hours" |
+| "The solution is highly scalable" | "The solution handles up to 50k concurrent connections on a single instance" |
+
+### 7. Active Voice by Default
+
+Use active voice unless the subject is genuinely unknown or unimportant.
+
+| Bad (passive) | Good (active) |
+|---------------|---------------|
+| "The feature was implemented by the team" | "The team implemented the feature" |
+| "Errors are logged by the system" | "The system logs errors" |
+| "The report will be generated" | "The system generates the report" |
+
+**Acceptable passive:** "The server was compromised at 03:00 UTC" (attacker unknown).
+
+## Enforcement
+
+This skill is enforced through:
+1. **Constitution L0 injection** — `human-writing` appears in every prompt's NON-NEGOTIABLE list
+2. **Self-critique phase** — Agents review their own output against these rules before delivery
+3. **Cross-department application** — Every department SKILL.md inherits this standard
+
+Agents who produce text that violates these rules must revise before delivering output.

package/config/agent-memory-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# {{AGENT_DISPLAY_NAME}} — Memory
+
+> Persistent memory for {{AGENT_DISPLAY_NAME}}. Updated across sessions.
+> Created: {{DATE}}
+
+## Key Decisions
+
+*Record important decisions made during sessions.*
+
+## Recurring Patterns
+
+*Patterns observed across multiple sessions (code styles, user preferences, common workflows).*
+
+## Gotchas
+
+*Errors and issues encountered repeatedly. Include the fix.*
+
+## Learned Preferences
+
+*User and project preferences discovered during work.*
+
+## DISC Interactions
+
+*Notes on how DISC profile affects collaboration with other agents. Communication adjustments, conflict resolution outcomes, and team dynamics observations.*
+
+## Project-Specific Notes
+
+*Notes tied to specific projects.*

package/config/disc-profiles.json

@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+{
+  "version": "1.0.0",
+  "description": "DISC Behavioral Framework reference for ARKA OS agent system",
+  "profiles": {
+    "D": {
+      "name": "Dominant",
+      "axis": { "pace": "fast", "focus": "task" },
+      "communication": {
+        "style": "Direct, concise, bottom-line first",
+        "pace": "Fast — wants answers, not stories",
+        "format": "Bullet points, decisions, trade-off tables"
+      },
+      "motivators": ["Results", "Control", "Challenges", "Efficiency"],
+      "demotivators": ["Indecision", "Micromanagement", "Lack of autonomy", "Long meetings without outcomes"],
+      "under_pressure": "Becomes more demanding and directive. May bypass consensus to unblock. Centralizes authority.",
+      "feedback_style": {
+        "giving": "Direct and specific. Points to the problem, expects a fix.",
+        "receiving": "Wants facts and evidence. Show data, not feelings."
+      },
+      "conflict_style": "Confronts directly. States position with evidence. Expects counter-evidence.",
+      "decision_speed": "Fast — decides with 70% information, course-corrects later"
+    },
+    "I": {
+      "name": "Influential",
+      "axis": { "pace": "fast", "focus": "people" },
+      "communication": {
+        "style": "Enthusiastic, story-driven, collaborative",
+        "pace": "Fast — energetic, builds momentum through conversation",
+        "format": "Stories, examples, visual metaphors, analogies"
+      },
+      "motivators": ["Recognition", "Collaboration", "Creativity", "New ideas"],
+      "demotivators": ["Isolation", "Rigid rules", "Repetitive work", "Being ignored"],
+      "under_pressure": "Becomes overly optimistic or scattered. May over-promise. Seeks social validation.",
+      "feedback_style": {
+        "giving": "Positive first, then constructive. Uses encouragement and examples.",
+        "receiving": "Prefers public recognition for wins, private for corrections."
+      },
+      "conflict_style": "Persuades with enthusiasm and social proof. Seeks compromise that keeps relationships intact.",
+      "decision_speed": "Fast — decides based on intuition and team energy, refines later"
+    },
+    "S": {
+      "name": "Steady",
+      "axis": { "pace": "measured", "focus": "people" },
+      "communication": {
+        "style": "Calm, supportive, methodical",
+        "pace": "Measured — listens before responding, values thoroughness",
+        "format": "Structured documents, checklists, step-by-step guides"
+      },
+      "motivators": ["Stability", "Team harmony", "Clear processes", "Meaningful contribution"],
+      "demotivators": ["Sudden change", "Conflict", "Ambiguity", "Being rushed"],
+      "under_pressure": "Becomes passive or avoidant. May agree externally while disagreeing internally. Slows down.",
+      "feedback_style": {
+        "giving": "Gentle, diplomatic, sandwich approach. Focuses on improvement, not blame.",
+        "receiving": "Prefers private, constructive feedback with time to process."
+      },
+      "conflict_style": "Avoids confrontation. Seeks consensus. Mediates between opposing parties.",
+      "decision_speed": "Measured — needs time to consider impact on team and processes"
+    },
+    "C": {
+      "name": "Conscientious",
+      "axis": { "pace": "deliberate", "focus": "task" },
+      "communication": {
+        "style": "Precise, data-driven, structured",
+        "pace": "Deliberate — thorough analysis before speaking",
+        "format": "Structured reports, data tables, references, checklists"
+      },
+      "motivators": ["Accuracy", "Quality", "Expertise", "Logical systems"],
+      "demotivators": ["Sloppy work", "Rushed decisions", "Lack of data", "Emotional arguments"],
+      "under_pressure": "Becomes overly cautious or analysis-paralysis. May withdraw to research more. Raises more objections.",
+      "feedback_style": {
+        "giving": "Detailed and specific with references. Points to standards and best practices.",
+        "receiving": "Wants detailed, factual feedback with evidence and examples."
+      },
+      "conflict_style": "Presents thorough analysis. Argues with data and precedent. May disengage if opponent uses emotion over logic.",
+      "decision_speed": "Deliberate — needs sufficient data and analysis time before committing"
+    }
+  },
+  "combinations": {
+    "D+C": { "label": "Driver-Analyst", "description": "Results-driven with high standards. Demands quality AND speed. Makes fast decisions backed by data." },
+    "D+I": { "label": "Driver-Inspirer", "description": "Action-oriented leader who motivates through vision. Pushes for results while keeping team engaged." },
+    "I+S": { "label": "Inspirer-Supporter", "description": "People-first collaborator. Builds team cohesion through enthusiasm and genuine care." },
+    "I+D": { "label": "Inspirer-Driver", "description": "Energetic visionary who pushes ideas to execution. Big-picture thinker with urgency." },
+    "I+C": { "label": "Inspirer-Analyst", "description": "Creative thinker with attention to detail. Combines enthusiasm with precision." },
+    "S+C": { "label": "Supporter-Analyst", "description": "Methodical and caring. Ensures quality through careful, process-driven work." },
+    "S+I": { "label": "Supporter-Inspirer", "description": "Warm team player who values harmony and collaboration. Builds bridges between people." },
+    "C+D": { "label": "Analyst-Driver", "description": "Quality-first executor. Designs thoroughly then drives implementation with discipline." },
+    "C+S": { "label": "Analyst-Supporter", "description": "Careful, reliable specialist. Produces high-quality work with steady consistency." },
+    "C+I": { "label": "Analyst-Inspirer", "description": "Research-oriented communicator. Deep analysis presented in engaging, accessible ways." }
+  },
+  "team_balance": {
+    "ideal_distribution": {
+      "D": { "min": 15, "max": 25, "label": "Dominant" },
+      "I": { "min": 20, "max": 30, "label": "Influential" },
+      "S": { "min": 20, "max": 30, "label": "Steady" },
+      "C": { "min": 25, "max": 35, "label": "Conscientious" }
+    },
+    "warnings": {
+      "too_few_D": "Lack of decisive leadership. Team may struggle with fast decisions and direction.",
+      "too_many_D": "Power conflicts. Multiple strong drivers competing for control.",
+      "too_few_I": "Low team energy and collaboration. Risk of siloed work.",
+      "too_many_I": "All talk, no execution. Too many ideas without follow-through.",
+      "too_few_S": "Lack of team stability and process continuity. Risk of burnout.",
+      "too_many_S": "Resistance to change. Team may be too cautious and slow to adapt.",
+      "too_few_C": "Quality issues. Decisions made without sufficient analysis.",
+      "too_many_C": "Analysis paralysis. Excessive deliberation slows delivery."
+    }
+  }
+}

package/config/disc-team-validator.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# ============================================================================
+# ARKA OS — DISC Team Balance Validator
+# Reads agents-registry.json and validates team DISC distribution
+# ============================================================================
+set -e
+
+ARKA_OS="${ARKA_OS:-$HOME/.claude/skills/arka}"
+REPO_DIR="${REPO_DIR:-$(cat "$ARKA_OS/.repo-path" 2>/dev/null || echo "")}"
+REGISTRY="${REGISTRY:-$REPO_DIR/knowledge/agents-registry.json}"
+
+if [ ! -f "$REGISTRY" ]; then
+  echo "Error: agents-registry.json not found at $REGISTRY"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+command -v jq &>/dev/null || { echo "Error: jq is required."; exit 1; }
+
+# Read counts from registry
+D_COUNT=$(jq '.team_composition.by_disc_primary.D' "$REGISTRY")
+I_COUNT=$(jq '.team_composition.by_disc_primary.I' "$REGISTRY")
+S_COUNT=$(jq '.team_composition.by_disc_primary.S' "$REGISTRY")
+C_COUNT=$(jq '.team_composition.by_disc_primary.C' "$REGISTRY")
+TOTAL=$(( D_COUNT + I_COUNT + S_COUNT + C_COUNT ))
+
+# Calculate percentages
+D_PCT=$(( D_COUNT * 100 / TOTAL ))
+I_PCT=$(( I_COUNT * 100 / TOTAL ))
+S_PCT=$(( S_COUNT * 100 / TOTAL ))
+C_PCT=$(( C_COUNT * 100 / TOTAL ))
+
+# Bar generator (10 chars wide)
+bar() {
+  local pct=$1
+  # Scale: 10 bars = 40% (max reasonable for one profile)
+  local filled=$(( pct * 10 / 40 ))
+  [ "$filled" -gt 10 ] && filled=10
+  local empty=$(( 10 - filled ))
+  local bar=""
+  for ((i=0; i<filled; i++)); do bar+="█"; done
+  for ((i=0; i<empty; i++)); do bar+="░"; done
+  echo "$bar"
+}
+
+# Status check against ideal ranges
+check_status() {
+  local profile=$1 pct=$2 min=$3 max=$4
+  if [ "$pct" -lt "$min" ]; then
+    echo "⚠ Low"
+  elif [ "$pct" -gt "$max" ]; then
+    echo "⚠ High"
+  else
+    echo "✓ OK"
+  fi
+}
+
+# Colors
+C='\033[0;36m'
+G='\033[0;32m'
+Y='\033[1;33m'
+R='\033[0;31m'
+N='\033[0m'
+
+D_STATUS=$(check_status "D" "$D_PCT" 15 25)
+I_STATUS=$(check_status "I" "$I_PCT" 20 30)
+S_STATUS=$(check_status "S" "$S_PCT" 20 30)
+C_STATUS=$(check_status "C" "$C_PCT" 25 35)
+
+echo ""
+echo -e "${C}═══ ARKA OS — Team DISC Balance ═══${N}"
+printf "  D (Dominant):      %d agents (%d%%)  %s  %s\n" "$D_COUNT" "$D_PCT" "$(bar $D_PCT)" "$D_STATUS"
+printf "  I (Influential):   %d agents (%d%%)  %s  %s\n" "$I_COUNT" "$I_PCT" "$(bar $I_PCT)" "$I_STATUS"
+printf "  S (Steady):        %d agents (%d%%)  %s  %s\n" "$S_COUNT" "$S_PCT" "$(bar $S_PCT)" "$S_STATUS"
+printf "  C (Conscientious): %d agents (%d%%)  %s  %s\n" "$C_COUNT" "$C_PCT" "$(bar $C_PCT)" "$C_STATUS"
+echo ""
+
+# Show gaps
+GAPS=""
+if [ "$S_PCT" -lt 20 ]; then
+  GAPS+="  Gap: S profile underrepresented. Consider adding PM or HR agent.\n"
+fi
+if [ "$D_PCT" -gt 25 ]; then
+  GAPS+="  Gap: D profile overrepresented. Watch for authority conflicts.\n"
+fi
+if [ "$C_PCT" -gt 35 ]; then
+  GAPS+="  Gap: C profile overrepresented. Risk of analysis paralysis.\n"
+fi
+
+if [ -n "$GAPS" ]; then
+  echo -e "$GAPS"
+fi
+
+echo -e "${C}═══════════════════════════════════${N}"
+echo ""