npm - arkaos - Versions diffs - 2.13.0 → 2.15.0 - Mend

arkaos 2.13.0 → 2.15.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Files changed (51) hide show

package/VERSION +1 -1
package/arka/skills/forge/SKILL.md +649 -0
package/config/constitution.yaml +8 -0
package/config/hooks/post-tool-use.sh +43 -0
package/config/hooks/session-start.sh +24 -0
package/config/hooks/user-prompt-submit.sh +25 -1
package/core/forge/__init__.py +104 -0
package/core/forge/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/forge/__pycache__/complexity.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/forge/__pycache__/handoff.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/forge/__pycache__/persistence.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/forge/__pycache__/renderer.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/forge/__pycache__/schema.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/forge/complexity.py +125 -0
package/core/forge/handoff.py +100 -0
package/core/forge/persistence.py +308 -0
package/core/forge/renderer.py +261 -0
package/core/forge/schema.py +213 -0
package/core/synapse/__init__.py +2 -2
package/core/synapse/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/synapse/__pycache__/engine.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/synapse/__pycache__/layers.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/synapse/engine.py +4 -2
package/core/synapse/layers.py +49 -0
package/core/sync/__init__.py +25 -0
package/core/sync/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/sync/__pycache__/descriptor_syncer.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/sync/__pycache__/discovery.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/sync/__pycache__/engine.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/sync/__pycache__/manifest.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/sync/__pycache__/mcp_syncer.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/sync/__pycache__/reporter.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/sync/__pycache__/schema.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/sync/__pycache__/settings_syncer.cpython-313.pyc +0 -0
package/core/sync/descriptor_syncer.py +166 -0
package/core/sync/discovery.py +256 -0
package/core/sync/engine.py +177 -0
package/core/sync/features/forge.yaml +16 -0
package/core/sync/features/quality-gate.yaml +15 -0
package/core/sync/features/spec-gate.yaml +15 -0
package/core/sync/features/workflow-tiers.yaml +19 -0
package/core/sync/manifest.py +87 -0
package/core/sync/mcp_syncer.py +255 -0
package/core/sync/reporter.py +178 -0
package/core/sync/schema.py +94 -0
package/core/sync/settings_syncer.py +121 -0
package/core/workflow/state_reader.sh +25 -1
package/departments/ops/skills/update/SKILL.md +69 -0
package/installer/update.js +14 -0
package/package.json +1 -1
package/pyproject.toml +1 -1

package/VERSION CHANGED Viewed

	@@ -1 +1 @@
1	- 2.13.0
1	+ 2.15.0

package/arka/skills/forge/SKILL.md ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,649 @@
+---
+name: arka-forge
+description: >
+  The Forge — ArkaOS intelligent multi-agent planning engine. Complexity-based
+  escalation, critic synthesis, visual companion, Obsidian persistence.
+  Analyses any prompt across 5 dimensions, routes to 1-3 explorer subagents,
+  runs a critic synthesis, and produces an approved ForgePlan before execution.
+allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, Agent, WebFetch, WebSearch]
+---
+# The Forge — ArkaOS Intelligent Planning Engine
+> **Engine:** `core/forge/` | **Plans stored:** `~/.arkaos/plans/` | **Obsidian:** `ArkaOS/Forge/`
+> **Tiers:** Shallow (score ≤30) · Standard (31-65) · Deep (≥66)
+> **Explorers:** Pragmatic · Architectural · Contrarian
+## Commands
+| Command | Description | When to use |
+|---------|-------------|-------------|
+| `/forge <prompt>` | Forge a new plan | Any task you want planned before executing |
+| `/forge resume` | Resume approved plan | After a session break, repo drift, or restart |
+| `/forge status` | Show active forge status | Check what plan is currently active |
+| `/forge history` | List all past plans | Browse plans saved in `~/.arkaos/plans/` |
+| `/forge show <id>` | Show plan detail | Inspect a specific plan by ID |
+| `/forge compare <id1> <id2>` | Compare two plans side-by-side | Evaluate alternative approaches |
+| `/forge patterns` | List extracted patterns | See reusable patterns from past plans |
+| `/forge cancel` | Cancel active forge | Discard current plan without executing |
+---
+## Main Flow: `/forge <prompt>`
+Execute every step sequentially. Never skip steps. Announce each step before running it.
+### Step 1 — Context Snapshot
+Collect the current repo context by running these Bash commands:
+```bash
+git rev-parse HEAD         # commit hash
+git branch --show-current  # branch name
+git remote get-url origin  # repo name
+cat VERSION 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown"  # ArkaOS version
+```
+Build a context dict:
+```
+repo: <origin url or directory name>
+branch: <current branch>
+commit_at_forge: <HEAD hash>
+arkaos_version: <VERSION file content>
+prompt: <original user prompt>
+```
+### Step 2 — Obsidian Knowledge Check
+Search Obsidian for relevant patterns and past plans using the MCP obsidian tool:
+1. Search `ArkaOS/Forge/Patterns/` for patterns matching keywords from the prompt
+2. Search `ArkaOS/Forge/Plans/` for plans with similar names or tags
+Collect:
+- `similar_plans: list[str]` — IDs of plans with overlapping domain/scope
+- `reused_patterns: list[str]` — pattern names that match this prompt's domain
+If Obsidian is unavailable, set both to `[]` and continue.
+### Step 3 — Complexity Analysis
+Call the complexity scorer via Python:
+```python
+import sys
+sys.path.insert(0, '<repo_root>')
+from core.forge.complexity import analyze_complexity
+result = analyze_complexity(
+    prompt="<user prompt>",
+    affected_files=[],          # estimate from prompt keywords: auth→auth/, db→core/db/, etc.
+    departments=[],             # estimate from prompt: "deploy"→ops, "feature"→dev, etc.
+    similar_plans=similar_plans,
+    reused_patterns=reused_patterns,
+)
+print(f"score={result.score} tier={result.tier.value}")
+print(f"scope={result.dimensions.scope} deps={result.dimensions.dependencies}")
+print(f"ambiguity={result.dimensions.ambiguity} risk={result.dimensions.risk} novelty={result.dimensions.novelty}")
+```
+Run this as a Bash command: `cd <repo_root> && python -c "..."`.
+Display the complexity breakdown using the renderer:
+```python
+from core.forge.renderer import render_complexity
+print(render_complexity(result))
+```
+### Step 4 — Tier Confirmation
+Display to user:
+```
+⚒ FORGE — Complexity Analysis
+  Score: <score>/100 (<Tier>)
+  │ Scope    │ <n> │ ██████░░░░
+  │ Deps     │ <n> │ ████░░░░░░
+  │ Ambig.   │ <n> │ ███████░░░
+  │ Risk     │ <n> │ █████░░░░░
+  │ Novelty  │ <n> │ ██░░░░░░░░
+  Tier: <Tier> → <N> explorer(s) + <critic>
+  Similar plans: <list or "none found">
+  Reusing patterns: <list or "none">
+Proceed with <Tier> tier? [Y/n/override shallow|standard|deep]
+```
+Wait for user input. Accept `Y` or Enter to proceed. Accept `override <tier>` to change tier. Accept `n` to abort.
+### Step 5 — Launch Explorer Subagents
+Launch explorer subagents **in parallel** based on confirmed tier:
+| Tier | Explorers | Run |
+|------|-----------|-----|
+| shallow | 1 — Pragmatic only | Sequential (inline) |
+| standard | 2 — Pragmatic + Architectural | Parallel via Agent tool |
+| deep | 3 — Pragmatic + Architectural + Contrarian | Parallel via Agent tool |
+For **shallow**, run the Pragmatic explorer inline (no subagent needed — just generate the approach directly).
+For **standard** and **deep**, use the Agent tool to dispatch each explorer as a subagent. Pass the full explorer prompt (see Explorer Subagent Instructions below).
+Each explorer must return a structured response:
+```
+EXPLORER: <lens>
+SUMMARY: <2-3 sentence description of the approach>
+KEY_DECISIONS:
+  - decision: <what>
+    rationale: <why>
+PHASES:
+  - name: <phase name>
+    department: <dev|ops|mkt|brand|fin|strat|pm|saas|landing|content|ecom|kb|sales|lead|community|org>
+    agents: [<agent names>]
+    deliverables: [<list>]
+    acceptance_criteria: [<list>]
+    depends_on: [<phase names that must complete first>]
+```
+### Step 6 — Launch Critic Subagent
+Assemble all explorer outputs. Strip explorer lens labels (anonymize) before sending to critic.
+Launch a Critic subagent via the Agent tool with the Critic Subagent Instructions below.
+The critic must return:
+```
+CONFIDENCE: <0.0-1.0>
+SYNTHESIS:
+  pragmatic: [<adopted elements>]
+  architectural: [<adopted elements>]
+  contrarian: [<adopted elements>]  # if applicable
+REJECTED:
+  - element: <what was rejected>
+    reason: <why>
+RISKS:
+  - risk: <description>
+    severity: high|medium|low
+    mitigation: <how to address>
+FINAL_PHASES:
+  - name: <phase name>
+    department: <dept>
+    agents: [<list>]
+    deliverables: [<list>]
+    acceptance_criteria: [<list>]
+    depends_on: [<list>]
+```
+### Step 7 — Render Terminal Output
+Build the ForgePlan object and render it:
+```python
+from core.forge.renderer import render_terminal
+from core.forge.handoff import select_execution_path
+# Build plan object from collected data
+# Call render_terminal(plan) to get the display string
+# Call select_execution_path(plan.plan_phases) to determine execution route
+```
+Display:
+```
+⚒ FORGE — <Plan Name>
+▸ Context Snapshot
+  Repo: <repo> @ <commit>
+  ArkaOS: <version> | Branch: <branch>
+▸ Complexity Analysis
+  <render_complexity output>
+▸ Critic Verdict
+  Confidence: <score>
+  ✓ <N> elements adopted
+  ✗ <N> elements rejected
+  ⚠ <N> risks identified
+▸ Plan: <N> phases across <N> department(s)
+  Phase 1: <name>                     [dept]     ░░░░░░░░
+  Phase 2: <name>                     [dept]     ░░░░░░░░
+  ...
+  Execution: <type> → <target>
+  Departments: <list>
+  QG required: yes
+  [A]pprove  [R]evise  [C]ompanion  [D]etail phase  [Q]uit
+```
+### Step 8 — User Decision
+Wait for user input and handle each option:
+| Input | Action |
+|-------|--------|
+| `A` or `approve` | Proceed to Step 9 (handoff) |
+| `R <text>` or `revise <text>` | Proceed to Revision Flow |
+| `C` or `companion` | Generate HTML companion (Step 6a), then re-show menu |
+| `D <n>` or `detail <n>` | Show full detail for phase N (agents, deliverables, criteria), then re-show menu |
+| `Q` or `quit` | Save plan as `draft`, clear active, exit |
+### Step 6a — Visual Companion (on C input)
+Generate HTML via the renderer and serve locally:
+```python
+from core.forge.renderer import render_html, should_suggest_companion
+html_content = render_html(plan)
+# Write to /tmp/forge-<plan_id>.html
+```
+```bash
+# Write HTML file
+python -c "
+import sys
+sys.path.insert(0, '<repo_root>')
+# ... build plan, call render_html, write to /tmp/forge-<id>.html
+"
+# Serve on random available port
+python -m http.server 0 --directory /tmp &
+# Open in browser
+open http://localhost:<port>/forge-<id>.html
+```
+Tell user: "Visual companion available at http://localhost:<port>/forge-<id>.html"
+Note: For `shallow` tier, companion is not generated (`should_suggest_companion()` returns `"none"`).
+For `standard`, it is available on request. For `deep`, proactively suggest it.
+### Step 9 — Handoff (on Approve)
+1. Check for repo drift since the snapshot:
+```python
+from core.forge.handoff import check_repo_drift
+drift = check_repo_drift(plan.context.commit_at_forge)
+if drift["changed"]:
+    # Warn user: "Repo changed since forge: X files modified"
+    # Ask: "Re-run complexity analysis? [y/N]"
+```
+2. Determine execution path:
+```python
+from core.forge.handoff import select_execution_path, generate_workflow_yaml
+path = select_execution_path(plan.plan_phases)
+```
+3. If path type is `workflow` or `enterprise_workflow`, generate and save the YAML:
+```python
+workflow_yaml = generate_workflow_yaml(plan)
+# Write to .arkaos/workflows/<plan_id>.yaml
+```
+4. Update plan status to `approved`, set `executed_at` timestamp.
+5. Save and set as active:
+```python
+from core.forge.persistence import save_plan, set_active_plan
+save_plan(plan)
+set_active_plan(plan.id)
+```
+6. Announce:
+```
+⚒ FORGE — Approved
+  Plan ID: <id>
+  Execution: <type> → <target>
+  Branch: <suggested branch name>
+  Ready. Proceeding with execution.
+```
+7. Hand off to the appropriate executor:
+   - `skill` → invoke the named ArkaOS skill with plan context
+   - `workflow` or `enterprise_workflow` → invoke `/dev feature` or equivalent department command, passing forge context as preamble
+### Step 10 — Persist to YAML + Obsidian
+After approval (or on quit/cancel):
+```python
+from core.forge.persistence import save_plan, export_to_obsidian
+path = save_plan(plan)
+obsidian_path = export_to_obsidian(plan)
+```
+For approved + completed plans, also extract patterns:
+```python
+from core.forge.persistence import extract_patterns
+patterns = extract_patterns(plan)
+if patterns:
+    print(f"  Patterns extracted: {len(patterns)}")
+```
+---
+## Explorer Subagent Instructions
+Each explorer subagent receives this preamble, then its specific lens instruction.
+**Preamble (send to all explorers):**
+```
+You are an expert planning agent within ArkaOS. Your task is to produce a
+structured execution plan for the following prompt.
+PROMPT: <original user prompt>
+REPO CONTEXT:
+  Repo: <repo>
+  Branch: <branch>
+  Commit: <commit>
+  ArkaOS: <version>
+OBSIDIAN KNOWLEDGE:
+  Similar plans found: <list or "none">
+  Reusable patterns: <list or "none">
+CONSTITUTION RULES (non-negotiable):
+  - branch-isolation: all work on feature branches, never main
+  - spec-driven: spec must exist before implementation
+  - solid-clean-code: SOLID + Clean Code on all code
+  - mandatory-qa: tests must pass, coverage >= 80%
+  - quality-gate: Marta + Eduardo + Francisca must APPROVE before done
+  - conventional-commits: all commits follow conventional commit format
+AVAILABLE DEPARTMENTS: dev, ops, mkt, brand, fin, strat, pm, saas,
+  landing, content, ecom, kb, sales, lead, community, org
+AVAILABLE AGENTS (examples):
+  dev: Paulo (lead), Gabriel (architect), Andre (backend), Diana (frontend),
+       Bruno (security), Carlos (devops), Rita (qa), Vasco (dba)
+  ops: Daniel (lead), Lucas (automation)
+  mkt: Luna (lead), Sofia (growth), Pedro (analytics), Carla (email)
+  brand: Valentina (lead), Miguel (visual), Ana (copy), Joao (ux)
+  quality (cross-cutting): Marta (CQO), Eduardo (copy), Francisca (tech)
+Your output MUST follow this exact format:
+EXPLORER: <your lens name>
+SUMMARY: <2-3 sentences>
+KEY_DECISIONS:
+  - decision: <what>
+    rationale: <why>
+PHASES:
+  - name: <phase name>
+    department: <dept>
+    agents: [<names>]
+    deliverables: [<items>]
+    acceptance_criteria: [<items>]
+    depends_on: [<phase names>]
+```
+**Pragmatic Explorer lens instruction:**
+```
+Your lens: PRAGMATIC
+Question to answer: "What is the simplest thing that works?"
+Principles:
+  - Minimum viable approach — reuse existing patterns, avoid over-engineering
+  - Maximum reuse of existing ArkaOS skills and workflows
+  - Fewer phases is better — collapse where safe to do so
+  - Prefer known, proven solutions over novel ones
+  - Identify what can be skipped without meaningful quality loss
+Be direct. Challenge gold-plating. Propose the leanest plan that still
+satisfies all Constitution rules.
+```
+**Architectural Explorer lens instruction:**
+```
+Your lens: ARCHITECTURAL
+Question to answer: "What is the right way to build this for the long term?"
+Principles:
+  - Long-term extensibility and maintainability over short-term speed
+  - Proper separation of concerns, clean boundaries
+  - Identify technical debt that would be created by a simpler approach
+  - Ensure observability, testability, and deployability are first-class
+  - Reference DDD, SOLID, Clean Architecture where applicable
+Be thorough. Do not cut corners that will create future problems.
+```
+**Contrarian Explorer lens instruction:**
+```
+Your lens: CONTRARIAN
+Question to answer: "What is everyone missing or assuming wrongly?"
+Principles:
+  - Challenge the premise of the prompt — is this the right problem to solve?
+  - Surface hidden dependencies, risks, and blockers others would miss
+  - Question every assumed constraint — are they real?
+  - Propose an alternative framing if the original prompt is misguided
+  - Identify the single biggest risk in the other approaches
+Be adversarial but constructive. Your job is to stress-test assumptions,
+not to be contrarian for its own sake. You must still produce a valid plan.
+```
+---
+## Critic Subagent Instructions
+The critic receives anonymized approaches (lens labels stripped). Send this prompt:
+```
+You are the Plan Critic within ArkaOS. You have received <N> independent
+planning approaches for the same prompt. Your job is to synthesize the best
+plan by combining the strongest elements from each approach.
+PROMPT: <original user prompt>
+APPROACHES:
+<approach_1_phases_and_decisions — label stripped>
+---
+<approach_2_phases_and_decisions — label stripped>
+---
+<approach_3_phases_and_decisions — label stripped, if deep tier>
+RULES:
+  - You MUST adopt the best elements from multiple approaches (do not just pick one)
+  - You MUST reject at least 1 element with a clear reason
+  - You MUST identify at least 1 risk in the final plan
+  - Confidence score must reflect genuine uncertainty (do not always output 0.9)
+  - The final phase list MUST include a Quality Gate phase as the penultimate step
+  - The final phase list MUST include an Obsidian persistence phase as the last step
+  - All Constitution rules apply to the final plan
+Your output MUST follow this exact format:
+CONFIDENCE: <0.0-1.0>
+SYNTHESIS:
+  approach_1: [<adopted elements from approach 1>]
+  approach_2: [<adopted elements from approach 2>]
+  approach_3: [<adopted elements from approach 3, if applicable>]
+REJECTED:
+  - element: <what>
+    reason: <why>
+RISKS:
+  - risk: <description>
+    severity: high|medium|low
+    mitigation: <how to address>
+FINAL_PHASES:
+  - name: <phase name>
+    department: <dept>
+    agents: [<names>]
+    deliverables: [<items>]
+    acceptance_criteria: [<items>]
+    depends_on: [<phase names>]
+```
+---
+## Revision Flow
+Triggered when user inputs `R <revision text>` at the decision menu.
+1. Do NOT re-run explorers. The critic re-evaluates incrementally.
+2. Increment `plan.revision_count` by 1.
+3. Send the critic subagent the current plan + user revision text:
+```
+REVISION REQUEST: <user revision text>
+CURRENT PLAN VERSION: <revision_count>
+Current phases:
+<current final phases>
+Current risks:
+<current risks>
+Update the plan to incorporate the revision. Apply the same output format.
+Only change what the revision explicitly requests. Preserve everything else.
+```
+4. Update plan with new critic output.
+5. Re-render terminal output (Step 7) with updated plan.
+6. Re-show the `[A]pprove [R]evise [C]ompanion [D]etail [Q]uit` menu.
+Maximum 5 revisions. After 5, warn user and offer approve-as-is or quit.
+---
+## Secondary Commands
+### `/forge resume`
+1. Call `get_active_plan()` from `core.forge.persistence`
+2. If no active plan: "No active forge plan. Run `/forge <prompt>` to start."
+3. If plan found:
+   - Call `check_repo_drift(plan.context.commit_at_forge)`
+   - If drift detected: warn user, offer to re-run complexity analysis
+   - Re-render terminal output (Step 7)
+   - Re-show decision menu (Step 8)
+### `/forge status`
+1. Call `get_active_plan()` from `core.forge.persistence`
+2. If none: "No active forge plan."
+3. Display:
+```
+⚒ FORGE — Active Plan
+  ID: <id>
+  Name: <name>
+  Status: <status>
+  Tier: <tier> | Score: <score>/100
+  Confidence: <critic confidence>
+  Phases: <N> across <depts>
+  Created: <timestamp>
+  Revisions: <count>
+```
+### `/forge history`
+1. Call `list_plans()` from `core.forge.persistence`
+2. If empty: "No forge plans found in ~/.arkaos/plans/"
+3. Display table:
+```
+⚒ FORGE — History
+  ID                    Name                    Status      Tier      Conf.  Created
+  forge-20260411-abc1   Add auth module         approved    deep      0.87   2026-04-11
+  forge-20260410-def2   Refactor billing flow   completed   standard  0.74   2026-04-10
+  ...
+```
+### `/forge show <id>`
+1. Call `load_plan(id)` from `core.forge.persistence`
+2. If not found: "Plan <id> not found."
+3. Display full terminal render via `render_terminal(plan)`
+4. Then show all approaches (explorer summaries) and full critic verdict.
+### `/forge compare <id1> <id2>`
+1. Load both plans via `load_plan()`
+2. Display side-by-side:
+```
+⚒ FORGE — Comparing Plans
+  Left: <id1> (<name1>)  |  Right: <id2> (<name2>)
+  Score: <s1>/100 (<tier1>) | Score: <s2>/100 (<tier2>)
+  Confidence: <c1>          | Confidence: <c2>
+  Phases: <n1>              | Phases: <n2>
+  PHASES LEFT                     PHASES RIGHT
+  ─────────────────────────────── ───────────────────────────────
+  Phase 1: <name>  [dept]         Phase 1: <name>  [dept]
+  Phase 2: <name>  [dept]         Phase 2: <name>  [dept]
+  ...
+  RISK DELTA:
+  Left risks not in right: <list>
+  Right risks not in left: <list>
+```
+### `/forge patterns`
+1. Call `load_patterns()` from `core.forge.persistence`
+2. If empty: "No patterns found in ArkaOS/Forge/Patterns/"
+3. Display:
+```
+⚒ FORGE — Reusable Patterns
+  Name                              Tier      Depts          Phases  Used
+  repo-dev-ops-pattern              deep      dev, ops       6       3
+  repo-dev-pattern                  standard  dev            4       7
+  ...
+```
+### `/forge cancel`
+1. Load active plan via `get_active_plan()`
+2. If none: "No active plan to cancel."
+3. Confirm: "Cancel plan '<name>'? This cannot be undone. [y/N]"
+4. On confirm: set `plan.status = ForgeStatus.CANCELLED`, call `save_plan()`, call `clear_active_plan()`
+5. "Forge plan cancelled. No changes were made to the codebase."
+---
+## Constitution Compliance
+The Forge enforces these Constitution rules at the plan level:
+| Rule | Enforcement |
+|------|-------------|
+| `branch-isolation` | Every plan must include a "Create feature branch" step in Phase 1 |
+| `spec-driven` | Plans touching code must have a Specification phase before Implementation |
+| `mandatory-qa` | All plans must include a QA phase (Rita) before Quality Gate |
+| `quality-gate` | All plans must end with a Quality Gate phase (Marta + Eduardo + Francisca) |
+| `obsidian-output` | All plans must end with an Obsidian persistence step |
+| `conventional-commits` | Remind in handoff message |
+If a critic output violates any of these, inject the missing phases automatically before showing the plan to the user. Announce: "Constitution enforcement: added missing <phase name> phase."
+---
+## Plan ID Format
+Plan IDs follow the format: `forge-YYYYMMDD-<4-char hex>`
+Example: `forge-20260411-a3f2`
+Generate with:
+```python
+import hashlib, datetime
+date = datetime.date.today().strftime("%Y%m%d")
+suffix = hashlib.md5(prompt.encode()).hexdigest()[:4]
+plan_id = f"forge-{date}-{suffix}"
+```

package/config/constitution.yaml CHANGED Viewed

@@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ enforcement_levels:
         rule: "Orchestrators must confirm understanding, ask clarifying questions, and challenge assumptions before executing any task"
         enforcement: "Pre-execution gate — restate request, ask at least 1 clarifying question, apply devil's advocate to at least 1 assumption"
+      - id: forge-governance
+        rule: "Forge plans must pass critic validation and governance check before approval"
+        enforcement: "Plan Critic validates constitution compliance; PostToolUse monitors execution"
   quality_gate:
     description: "Mandatory pre-delivery review. Nothing ships without APPROVED verdict."
     trigger: "After the last execution phase, before delivery to user"
@@ -113,6 +117,10 @@ enforcement_levels:
         rule: "All ecosystem skills must follow the standard 7-phase workflow defined in config/standards/ecosystem-workflow.md"
         enforcement: "Ecosystem SKILL.md files must reference or implement all 7 phases"
+      - id: forge-persistence
+        rule: "All forge plans (approved and rejected) must be persisted to Obsidian"
+        enforcement: "persistence.py exports on status change; audit detects missing exports"
   should:
     description: "Best practices. Encouraged but not enforced."
     rules: