archik 0.16.1 → 0.17.0

package/commands/migrate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+---
+description: Finish a migration — back-fill the artifacts the migrator flagged
+---
+
+# /archik:migrate — back-fill what the deterministic migration couldn't
+
+`archik upgrade --migrate` already ran the **deterministic** migration:
+it archived the old project, moved files into the current layout,
+validated, and advanced `.archik/.version`. It then flagged the parts
+that need **judgment** — usually: *the project has an architecture but no
+use cases / sequence diagrams.* Your job is to back-fill those, grounded
+in **both** the current model and the **archived original**.
+
+The deterministic steps are done. Do NOT redo them. You author the
+missing artifacts; `archik validate` is your gate.
+
+## CLI-only for architecture; direct-write for the Jacobson files
+
+Interact with the architecture diagram only through `npx archik`. Actors,
+use cases, and sequence diagrams are **direct-write** files (no sidecar) —
+author them with `Write`, then `npx archik validate`. Never edit
+`.archik/main.archik.yaml` by hand. **Never delete `.archik.archive/`** —
+it is the developer's only copy of the pre-migration project.
+
+## Steps
+
+1. **See exactly what's missing.** The migrator's `needsJudgment` hint is
+   printed once and not re-derivable, so check the project directly:
+   ```bash
+   npx archik q usecases     # empty → use cases need back-filling
+   npx archik q actors       # empty → actors needed first (use cases reference them)
+   npx archik q sequences    # which flows already have a seq diagram
+   ```
+
+2. **Read the archived original — this is the migration's whole point.**
+   Find the newest archive and read the old project's intent (descriptions,
+   any notes, the old structure) so the back-fill reflects what the
+   developer actually built, not a generic guess:
+   ```bash
+   ls -t .archik.archive/        # newest timestamp dir is the pre-migration copy
+   ```
+   Read the files under that dir with the `Read` tool (the archive is a
+   plain backup, not a live archik doc — reading it directly is correct).
+
+3. **Ground the use cases in the current model.** Combine the archive's
+   intent with the live structure:
+   ```bash
+   npx archik q stats
+   npx archik q list
+   npx archik q edges
+   ```
+
+4. **Author actors first** (if `q actors` was empty). Use cases reference
+   actors by id, and validate rejects a use case whose `primaryActor`
+   isn't in the actor index. Direct-write `.archik/actors.archik.actors.yaml`
+   (schema: `npx archik schema actors`), then `npx archik validate`.
+
+5. **Author one use case per real flow.** Direct-write
+   `.archik/usecases/<id>.archik.uc.yaml` (schema: `npx archik schema uc`).
+   Mark each slice `status: proposed` and give it `tests:` paths only if
+   those files exist on disk — otherwise omit `tests` (active slices
+   require on-disk tests). Validate after each:
+   `npx archik validate .archik/main.archik.yaml`.
+
+6. **Author a sequence diagram per primary slice.** Direct-write
+   `.archik/<usecase>.<slice>.archik.seq.yaml` (schema: `npx archik schema seq`).
+   Every participant `nodeId` must be a real node; add a `realizes` block
+   AND point the slice's `realization.seqFile` back at the file
+   (bidirectional). Add the seq to each participating node's `seqFiles`
+   via the normal `suggest set` → `accept` workflow.
+
+7. **Verify and report.** Then propose the natural next step (write the
+   tests the slices name, flip them to `active`), don't end on "done":
+   ```bash
+   npx archik validate .archik/main.archik.yaml
+   npx archik trace
+   npx archik drift
+   ```
+
+## Done when
+
+`archik validate` is clean and `archik q usecases` lists the back-filled
+use cases, each primary slice realising a sequence diagram. The archive
+stays untouched as the developer's rollback.