altimate-receipts 0.12.0 → 0.13.0

package/dist/{chunk-D4RJFPLT.js → chunk-55AJDHKF.js}

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import {
   loadSession,
   selectSummary,
   upsertSection
-} from "./chunk-EY3FFYN6.js";
+} from "./chunk-G3YX5FUS.js";
 
 // src/report/sessions.ts
 async function deriveTargets(opts) {
@@ -259,4 +259,4 @@ export {
   renderTrends,
   upsertTrendsSection
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-D4RJFPLT.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-55AJDHKF.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-EY3FFYN6.js → chunk-G3YX5FUS.js}

@@ -2727,7 +2727,11 @@ function deriveFindings(sum) {
       id: `destructive-${sp.spanId}`,
       severity: "critical",
       title: snippet ? `Destructive op: ${snippet}${times}` : `Destructive operation ran: ${sp.name}${times}`,
-      detail: `\`${clause.slice(0, 100)}\` is irreversible${sp.status === "error" ? " (it errored)" : ""}${count > 1 ? ` and ran ${count}\xD7` : ""}. Was this intended?`,
+      // M89 — scope-frame the largest noise bucket: a destructive op is a command the
+      // agent RAN (in its workspace / against infra), not an edit to a reviewed file —
+      // say so, and show the FULL command (not a 44-char title fragment) so the reviewer
+      // can verify what ran. R2: mechanism + "confirm it was intended", never a verdict.
+      detail: `The agent ran \`${truncateClause(clause, 200)}\` during the session \u2014 a command it executed, not an edit to a file in this PR. It's irreversible${sp.status === "error" ? " (it errored)" : ""}${count > 1 ? ` and ran ${count}\xD7` : ""} \u2014 confirm it was intended (e.g. a scratch/sandbox target), not a mistake on real data.`,
       impactLabel: "data-loss risk",
       confidence: 1,
       score: scoreOf("critical", 1, 1),
@@ -5211,4 +5215,4 @@ export {
   redact,
   redactReceipt
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-EY3FFYN6.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-G3YX5FUS.js.map