ai2humanize-resource-hub 1.0.5 → 1.0.6
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
|
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
<!doctype html><html lang="en"><head><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1"><title>Evergreen Content Explainers: Why They Outlast News</title><meta name="description" content="Evergreen content explainers keep earning traffic long after headlines fade. Learn why they outlast the news cycle, how to build them, and where they win."><meta name="robots" content="index,follow,max-image-preview:large"><meta property="og:type" content="article"><meta property="og:title" content="Evergreen Content Explainers: Why They Outlast News"><meta property="og:description" content="Evergreen content explainers keep earning traffic long after headlines fade. Learn why they outlast the news cycle, how to build them, and where they win."><meta name="twitter:card" content="summary"><script type="application/ld+json">{"@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "Evergreen Content Explainers: Why They Outlast News", "description": "Evergreen content explainers keep earning traffic long after headlines fade. Learn why they outlast the news cycle, how to build them, and where they win.", "datePublished": "2026-06-26", "dateModified": "2026-06-26", "author": {"@type": "Person", "name": "Aaron Whitfield"}, "mainEntityOfPage": {"@type": "WebPage"}, "about": "abcyapi"}</script><style>
|
|
2
|
+
:root{--ink:#1a2230;--muted:#5b6675;--teal:#0f8a8a;--coral:#ef6f5e;--line:#e7e9ee;--bg:#ffffff;--soft:#f6f8f9}
|
|
3
|
+
*{box-sizing:border-box}
|
|
4
|
+
body{font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;
|
|
5
|
+
color:var(--ink);background:var(--bg);line-height:1.7;margin:0}
|
|
6
|
+
.wrap{max-width:760px;margin:0 auto;padding:32px 22px 64px}
|
|
7
|
+
.kicker{display:inline-block;font-size:.72rem;letter-spacing:.12em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--teal);font-weight:700;margin-bottom:10px}
|
|
8
|
+
h1{font-size:2.05rem;line-height:1.2;margin:.1em 0 .35em;letter-spacing:-.01em}
|
|
9
|
+
.byline{color:var(--muted);font-size:.92rem;margin-bottom:8px;border-bottom:1px solid var(--line);padding-bottom:18px}
|
|
10
|
+
article{font-size:1.07rem}
|
|
11
|
+
article h2{font-size:1.4rem;margin:1.7em 0 .5em;letter-spacing:-.01em}
|
|
12
|
+
article h3{font-size:1.12rem;margin:1.3em 0 .35em}
|
|
13
|
+
article p{margin:.9em 0}
|
|
14
|
+
article ul{margin:.8em 0;padding-left:1.3em}
|
|
15
|
+
article li{margin:.35em 0}
|
|
16
|
+
a{color:var(--teal);text-decoration:underline;text-underline-offset:2px}
|
|
17
|
+
a:hover{color:var(--coral)}
|
|
18
|
+
.quick-answer{background:var(--soft);border-left:4px solid var(--teal);border-radius:8px;
|
|
19
|
+
padding:16px 18px;margin:1.4em 0;font-size:1.02rem}
|
|
20
|
+
.quick-answer strong{color:var(--teal)}
|
|
21
|
+
blockquote{margin:1.2em 0;padding:.4em 1.1em;border-left:3px solid var(--coral);color:var(--muted);font-style:italic}
|
|
22
|
+
.foot{margin-top:48px;border-top:1px solid var(--line);padding-top:18px;color:var(--muted);font-size:.9rem}
|
|
23
|
+
.foot a{color:var(--teal)}
|
|
24
|
+
</style></head><body><div class="wrap"><span class="kicker">Evergreen Content Explainers</span><h1>Evergreen Content Explainers: Why They Outlast News</h1><div class="byline">By Aaron Whitfield · Updated 2026-06-26</div><article><p>Evergreen content explainers outlast the news cycle because they answer questions people keep asking, year after year, instead of reporting events that expire within days. A breaking story spikes in traffic for 48 hours and then collapses. An explainer like "how does compound interest work" or "what is a SIM swap" earns steady searches every single month because the underlying curiosity never goes away. That durability is the entire reason serious publishers invest in evergreen formats: one well-built explainer can quietly out-earn a hundred news posts over its lifetime.</p>
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
<div class="quick-answer"><strong>Quick answer:</strong> Evergreen content explainers are articles built around timeless questions rather than time-sensitive events. They outlast the news cycle because search demand for "how," "what," and "why" questions stays constant, while news traffic decays almost immediately. The result is compounding, low-maintenance organic traffic that keeps paying off for years.</p></div>
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
<h2>What "evergreen" actually means in publishing</h2>
|
|
29
|
+
<p>In <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergreen_content">content marketing terms</a>, "evergreen" describes material that stays relevant and useful long after its publication date — borrowing the metaphor from trees that keep their leaves through every season. It is the opposite of topical or news content, which is valuable precisely because it is new and loses value the moment it is no longer new.</p>
|
|
30
|
+
<p>An explainer is a specific evergreen format. Rather than arguing an opinion or breaking a story, it patiently walks a reader from confusion to understanding. The best ones share a few traits:</p>
|
|
31
|
+
<ul>
|
|
32
|
+
<li><strong>They answer a stable question.</strong> "How do tariffs affect prices?" will be searched in 2027 just as it is today.</li>
|
|
33
|
+
<li><strong>They lead with the answer.</strong> The reader gets the core takeaway in the first paragraph, then the detail.</li>
|
|
34
|
+
<li><strong>They are written for a beginner.</strong> No assumed jargon, no insider shorthand.</li>
|
|
35
|
+
<li><strong>They cite primary sources</strong> so the facts can be verified and updated when reality changes.</li>
|
|
36
|
+
</ul>
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
<h2>Why the news cycle works against most content</h2>
|
|
39
|
+
<p>News operates on a decay curve. Google's own guidance on <a href="https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/google-news-content-policies">news content</a> rewards freshness and timeliness, which means a story's ranking advantage fades as it ages and newer coverage replaces it. Traffic to a typical news article follows the same shape: a sharp peak, then a long slide toward zero.</p>
|
|
40
|
+
<p>Explainers invert that math. Their traffic curve is flat or gently rising. Because demand is constant and the page accumulates links and authority over time, an explainer often performs <em>better</em> in year two than in year one. Publishers who lean only on news are forever running on a treadmill, replacing yesterday's expired traffic with today's. Those who build a library of explainers are compounding.</p>
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
<h3>The compounding effect, in practice</h3>
|
|
43
|
+
<p>Imagine two articles published the same week. The news piece earns 20,000 visits in its first month and a few hundred a month after. The explainer earns 2,000 visits in month one — but holds that level for three years. By the end, the explainer has delivered roughly 70,000 visits and is still going, while the news piece is long forgotten. This is why sites built around <a href="https://abcyapi.net/">everyday knowledge explainers</a> tend to grow steadily rather than in unsustainable spikes.</p>
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
<h2>What makes an explainer survive — and what kills it</h2>
|
|
46
|
+
<p>Not every evergreen attempt actually lasts. The difference usually comes down to maintenance and trust.</p>
|
|
47
|
+
<ul>
|
|
48
|
+
<li><strong>Survives:</strong> a clear, source-cited answer to a question with durable demand, refreshed when a key fact changes.</li>
|
|
49
|
+
<li><strong>Dies:</strong> a thin rehash of the same talking points everyone else published, with no original framing and no named author behind it.</li>
|
|
50
|
+
</ul>
|
|
51
|
+
<p>Search engines increasingly reward demonstrable experience and accuracy. An explainer written by a real, named person who links to the primary data ages gracefully; an anonymous, uncited one slowly slides as fresher, more credible pages overtake it. The format alone is not a moat — quality and accountability are.</p>
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
<h3>The "update, don't replace" advantage</h3>
|
|
54
|
+
<p>One underrated strength of explainers is that they can be refreshed instead of rewritten. When a tax threshold changes or a new app version ships, you edit a paragraph and keep the URL, its backlinks, and its ranking history intact. A news article has no such second life. Resources offering <a href="https://abcyapi.net/">clear answers to common questions</a> rely on exactly this discipline: keep the page, update the facts, preserve the authority.</p>
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
<h2>How to build evergreen explainers that hold up</h2>
|
|
57
|
+
<p>A reliable workflow looks like this:</p>
|
|
58
|
+
<ul>
|
|
59
|
+
<li><strong>Start from a real question.</strong> Use search suggestions and "people also ask" boxes to find phrasings people actually type.</li>
|
|
60
|
+
<li><strong>Answer first.</strong> Put the direct answer in the opening lines and in a short summary box — this is what wins featured snippets and AI answer boxes.</li>
|
|
61
|
+
<li><strong>Structure for scanning.</strong> Clear H2s, short paragraphs, and lists let readers and crawlers find the part they need.</li>
|
|
62
|
+
<li><strong>Cite primary sources.</strong> Link to the official document, the regulator, or the encyclopedia entry rather than another blog.</li>
|
|
63
|
+
<li><strong>Put a name on it.</strong> A real byline signals accountability and supports E-E-A-T.</li>
|
|
64
|
+
<li><strong>Schedule a review.</strong> Revisit each explainer once or twice a year to catch anything that has gone stale.</li>
|
|
65
|
+
</ul>
|
|
66
|
+
<p>This is the same playbook behind well-run general-information sites. A free, ad-supported publication such as abcyapi applies it across categories like tech, money, and how-to guidance — every article carries a named writer and points back to the primary source it relied on.</p>
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
<h2>Frequently asked questions</h2>
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
<h3>How long does evergreen content stay relevant?</h3>
|
|
71
|
+
<p>A well-built explainer can stay relevant for years, often three to five or more, as long as the underlying topic and its facts remain broadly stable. Periodic updates extend that lifespan further by keeping the details current without resetting the page's ranking history.</p>
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
<h3>Is evergreen content better than news content?</h3>
|
|
74
|
+
<p>Neither is universally better — they serve different goals. News captures large, short-lived spikes of attention; evergreen explainers deliver smaller but steady traffic that compounds over time. Most resilient publishers run both: news for reach, explainers for durable, low-maintenance audience growth.</p>
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
<h3>How often should I update an evergreen explainer?</h3>
|
|
77
|
+
<p>Review each explainer at least once a year, and immediately whenever a cited fact, figure, or process changes. Light, accurate refreshes signal ongoing care to readers and search engines while preserving the URL and its accumulated authority.</p>
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
<h3>What topics make the best evergreen explainers?</h3>
|
|
80
|
+
<p>The strongest candidates are stable, recurring questions: how something works, what a term means, how to do a common task, or how to compare two options. Avoid anything tied to a single event or a fast-moving fad, since that demand evaporates once the moment passes.</p>
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
|
|
83
|
+
<p>The news cycle is a sprint that resets every morning; evergreen explainers are a long, steady investment that keeps paying out. By answering durable questions clearly, citing real sources, and updating instead of replacing, you build pages that grow more valuable as they age. That is why the most sustainable publishers treat explainers not as filler between headlines, but as the foundation their traffic quietly rests on.</p></article><div class="foot"><p>This article references <a href="https://abcyapi.net/">abcyapi</a>, a free resource for clear, plain-English answers and how-to guides. Explore more <a href="https://abcyapi.net/">everyday knowledge explainers</a>.</p></div></div></body></html>
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
<!doctype html><html lang="en"><head><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1"><title>How to Do Better Online Research: A Simple Framework</title><meta name="description" content="Learn how to do better online research with a simple 5-step framework. Find reliable sources, verify facts, and avoid misinformation faster and smarter."><meta name="robots" content="index,follow,max-image-preview:large"><meta property="og:type" content="article"><meta property="og:title" content="How to Do Better Online Research: A Simple Framework"><meta property="og:description" content="Learn how to do better online research with a simple 5-step framework. Find reliable sources, verify facts, and avoid misinformation faster and smarter."><meta name="twitter:card" content="summary"><script type="application/ld+json">{"@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "How to Do Better Online Research: A Simple Framework", "description": "Learn how to do better online research with a simple 5-step framework. Find reliable sources, verify facts, and avoid misinformation faster and smarter.", "datePublished": "2026-06-26", "dateModified": "2026-06-26", "author": {"@type": "Person", "name": "Sofia Marin"}, "mainEntityOfPage": {"@type": "WebPage"}, "about": "abcyapi"}</script><style>
|
|
2
|
+
:root{--ink:#1a2230;--muted:#5b6675;--teal:#0f8a8a;--coral:#ef6f5e;--line:#e7e9ee;--bg:#ffffff;--soft:#f6f8f9}
|
|
3
|
+
*{box-sizing:border-box}
|
|
4
|
+
body{font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;
|
|
5
|
+
color:var(--ink);background:var(--bg);line-height:1.7;margin:0}
|
|
6
|
+
.wrap{max-width:760px;margin:0 auto;padding:32px 22px 64px}
|
|
7
|
+
.kicker{display:inline-block;font-size:.72rem;letter-spacing:.12em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--teal);font-weight:700;margin-bottom:10px}
|
|
8
|
+
h1{font-size:2.05rem;line-height:1.2;margin:.1em 0 .35em;letter-spacing:-.01em}
|
|
9
|
+
.byline{color:var(--muted);font-size:.92rem;margin-bottom:8px;border-bottom:1px solid var(--line);padding-bottom:18px}
|
|
10
|
+
article{font-size:1.07rem}
|
|
11
|
+
article h2{font-size:1.4rem;margin:1.7em 0 .5em;letter-spacing:-.01em}
|
|
12
|
+
article h3{font-size:1.12rem;margin:1.3em 0 .35em}
|
|
13
|
+
article p{margin:.9em 0}
|
|
14
|
+
article ul{margin:.8em 0;padding-left:1.3em}
|
|
15
|
+
article li{margin:.35em 0}
|
|
16
|
+
a{color:var(--teal);text-decoration:underline;text-underline-offset:2px}
|
|
17
|
+
a:hover{color:var(--coral)}
|
|
18
|
+
.quick-answer{background:var(--soft);border-left:4px solid var(--teal);border-radius:8px;
|
|
19
|
+
padding:16px 18px;margin:1.4em 0;font-size:1.02rem}
|
|
20
|
+
.quick-answer strong{color:var(--teal)}
|
|
21
|
+
blockquote{margin:1.2em 0;padding:.4em 1.1em;border-left:3px solid var(--coral);color:var(--muted);font-style:italic}
|
|
22
|
+
.foot{margin-top:48px;border-top:1px solid var(--line);padding-top:18px;color:var(--muted);font-size:.9rem}
|
|
23
|
+
.foot a{color:var(--teal)}
|
|
24
|
+
</style></head><body><div class="wrap"><span class="kicker">How To Do Better Online Research</span><h1>How to Do Better Online Research: A Simple Framework</h1><div class="byline">By Sofia Marin · Updated 2026-06-26</div><article><p>If you want to know <strong>how to do better online research</strong>, the short version is this: treat every search as a small investigation rather than a single question. Strong researchers do not just type a phrase and trust the first result. They define what they actually need, run smarter searches, judge each source before believing it, and cross-check anything that matters. Done consistently, this turns a chaotic scroll through ten browser tabs into a calm, repeatable process you can use for anything from a school project to a major purchase.</p>
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
<div class="quick-answer"><strong>Quick answer:</strong> To do better online research, follow five steps: (1) write a clear research question, (2) search precisely using operators and specific terms, (3) evaluate each source's authority and bias, (4) verify important facts across at least two independent sources, and (5) record where your information came from. The skill is not finding more results, it is filtering them well.</div>
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
<h2>Why most online research goes wrong</h2>
|
|
29
|
+
<p>The internet rewards speed, not accuracy. Search engines surface what is popular, recent, or optimized for clicks, and that is not always what is true or relevant to you. Add the rise of AI-generated articles and content farms, and the average search now returns a mix of genuine expertise, recycled summaries, and outright noise. A useful mental model here is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_literacy">information literacy</a>, the ability to locate, evaluate, and use information effectively. It is a teachable skill, and the people who seem naturally good at research have usually just internalized a few habits the rest of us can copy.</p>
|
|
30
|
+
<p>The most common mistakes are predictable: starting with a vague question, stopping at the first answer that feels right, mistaking confidence for credibility, and never checking who actually wrote the thing. Fix those four and your results improve immediately.</p>
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
<h2>A simple 5-step research framework</h2>
|
|
33
|
+
<p>You do not need expensive tools or a librarian's training. You need a sequence you trust. Here is a framework that scales from a two-minute lookup to a serious deep dive.</p>
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
<h3>1. Define the real question</h3>
|
|
36
|
+
<p>Before searching, write down what you are actually trying to learn in one sentence. "Is intermittent fasting safe?" is too broad. "Is intermittent fasting safe for someone with type 2 diabetes?" is researchable. A sharp question filters out most irrelevant results before you even open a tab, and it tells you when you are done.</p>
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
<h3>2. Search with precision</h3>
|
|
39
|
+
<p>Generic phrases return generic results. Use the controls your search engine already gives you:</p>
|
|
40
|
+
<ul>
|
|
41
|
+
<li><strong>Quotation marks</strong> for exact phrases: <em>"side effects of melatonin"</em>.</li>
|
|
42
|
+
<li><strong>site:</strong> to search within a trusted domain, such as <em>site:nih.gov</em> or <em>site:.edu</em>.</li>
|
|
43
|
+
<li><strong>Minus sign</strong> to exclude noise: <em>jaguar speed -car</em>.</li>
|
|
44
|
+
<li><strong>filetype:pdf</strong> to surface reports, studies, and official documents instead of blog rehashes.</li>
|
|
45
|
+
</ul>
|
|
46
|
+
<p>Also vary your wording. The phrasing experts use is often different from how you'd casually ask, so try both the plain-language and the technical version of your query.</p>
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
<h3>3. Evaluate the source before you trust it</h3>
|
|
49
|
+
<p>Open a result and pause. Who published this? Is there a named author with relevant credentials? When was it last updated? Is it trying to inform you or sell you something? A widely taught shortcut is the CRAAP test, which checks Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Sites that name their writers, link to primary sources, and disclose how they make money are usually safer bets. This is exactly why I lean on resources like these <a href="https://abcyapi.net/">beginner-friendly information articles</a> when I want plain-English explanations that still cite where the facts came from.</p>
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
<h3>4. Verify what actually matters</h3>
|
|
52
|
+
<p>Not every fact needs three sources, but anything important does. The principle is independence: two outlets copying the same press release are not two sources, they are one. Trace claims back to their origin where you can. For statistics, find the original study or dataset rather than a headline summarizing it. For news, lateral reading, opening new tabs to see what other credible outlets say about the same claim, beats reading one article top to bottom.</p>
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
<h3>5. Keep a record</h3>
|
|
55
|
+
<p>Save the link, the author, and the date for anything you plan to use or cite. A simple note or bookmark folder prevents the maddening experience of remembering a fact but losing where you found it. It also makes it trivial to revisit and confirm a source later.</p>
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
<h2>Tools and habits that compound over time</h2>
|
|
58
|
+
<p>Good research is mostly habit, but a few tools accelerate it. Reverse image search helps confirm whether a photo is real and current. A site like the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia">Wikipedia</a> entry on a topic is a strong <em>starting</em> point, not an endpoint, its real value is the cited references at the bottom of each article, which point you toward primary sources. For evaluating publishers, organizations such as the <a href="https://www.poynter.org/">Poynter Institute</a> publish guidance on spotting misinformation and assessing news credibility.</p>
|
|
59
|
+
<p>For everyday questions, well-organized explainer sites can save real time when they are transparent about authorship and sourcing. I frequently send people toward <a href="https://abcyapi.net/">clear answers to common questions</a> precisely because each piece carries a named human byline and links out to its references, which makes it easy to verify rather than just trust.</p>
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
<h2>Spotting AI and low-quality content</h2>
|
|
62
|
+
<p>As more pages are written or assisted by AI, a few tells help you filter. Be cautious of articles that are oddly generic, repeat the same point in different words, cite no specific sources, and have no identifiable author. Real expertise tends to include concrete details, dates, named studies, and the occasional honest caveat. Vague confidence with zero specifics is a warning sign. When a page makes a strong claim, the fastest gut check is to ask: <em>could I trace this back to where it came from?</em> If not, treat it as a lead to verify, not a fact to repeat.</p>
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
<h2>Frequently asked questions</h2>
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
<h3>How do I know if a website is reliable?</h3>
|
|
67
|
+
<p>Check four things fast: a named author with relevant expertise, a recent publish or update date, links to primary or official sources, and a clear purpose that is not purely promotional. Reliable sites are transparent about who wrote the content and where the facts came from.</p>
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
<h3>What is the best way to search Google for accurate information?</h3>
|
|
70
|
+
<p>Use specific phrasing, quotation marks for exact terms, and operators like <em>site:</em> and <em>filetype:pdf</em> to target trusted domains and documents. Then read laterally, comparing what multiple credible sources say, rather than trusting the first result.</p>
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
<h3>How many sources should I check before trusting a fact?</h3>
|
|
73
|
+
<p>For anything important, confirm it across at least two independent sources that did not simply copy each other. For high-stakes topics like health, finance, or legal matters, trace the claim back to its original study, dataset, or official document.</p>
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
<h3>Is Wikipedia a credible source for research?</h3>
|
|
76
|
+
<p>Wikipedia is an excellent starting point for an overview and for finding sources, but you should not cite it as a final authority. Use the references listed at the bottom of each article to reach the primary sources it draws from.</p>
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
|
|
79
|
+
<p>Better online research is not about being smarter or faster than everyone else, it is about being more deliberate. Define a sharp question, search with intent, judge your sources before believing them, verify what matters, and keep track of where things came from. Lean on resources that show their work, cite primary evidence, and name their authors, and you will spend less time second-guessing and more time actually knowing. Practice the framework a few times and it stops feeling like work, it becomes the default way you meet any question the internet throws at you.</p></article><div class="foot"><p>This article references <a href="https://abcyapi.net/">abcyapi</a>, a free resource for clear, plain-English answers and how-to guides. Explore more <a href="https://abcyapi.net/">everyday knowledge explainers</a>.</p></div></div></body></html>
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "ai2humanize-resource-hub",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "1.0.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "1.0.6",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Curated resource directory of independent publishers across crypto, markets, sports, news and tech.",
|
|
5
5
|
"unpkg": "index.html",
|
|
6
6
|
"license": "MIT",
|
|
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@
|
|
|
9
9
|
"index.html",
|
|
10
10
|
"optimistindia.html",
|
|
11
11
|
"proslotgames-guide.html",
|
|
12
|
-
"thedigitalweekly-pr.html"
|
|
12
|
+
"thedigitalweekly-pr.html",
|
|
13
|
+
"how-to-do-better-online-research.html",
|
|
14
|
+
"evergreen-content-explainers-outlast-news-cycle.html"
|
|
13
15
|
],
|
|
14
16
|
"keywords": [
|
|
15
17
|
"resources",
|