ai-flow-dev 2.7.0 → 2.8.1

package/prompts/frontend/flow-build-phase-0.md

@@ -1,425 +1,425 @@
-## PHASE 0: Context Discovery (2-5 min)
-
-> **Order for this phase:** ALWAYS executed FIRST if an existing project is detected. Skip ONLY for new projects.
-
-> **📌 Scope-based behavior:**
-> - **Interactive Mode:** Ask user for permission to scan files layer by layer.
-> - **Autonomous Mode:** Scan all layers automatically and present the final report.
-
-### Objective
-Efficiently analyze existing projects using a **layered, incremental approach**.
-
----
-
-## 🚫 Critical Exclusion Rules
-To avoid false-positive detections, **IGNORE** the following folders and files during all detection steps:
-- `.ai-flow/work/` (contains active development tasks)
-- `.ai-flow/archive/` (contains completed tasks)
-- `.agent/` (contains AI workflows)
-- `docs/` and `specs/` (if they contain AI Flow generated documentation)
-- `planning/` (if it contains AI Flow generated roadmap and user stories)
-- `project-brief.md`, `ai-instructions.md`, `AGENT.md`
-
-**A project is considered "Existing" only if it contains functional source code or framework configuration files OUTSIDE these excluded paths.**
-
----
-
-## 0.0 Check for Existing Analysis (Layer 0)
-
-Check if `.ai-flow/cache/docs-analysis.json` exists and is fresh.
-
-**If found:**
-Ask user to use cached analysis or re-analyze.
-
-**If not found:**
-Proceed to Layer 1.
-
----
-
-// turbo
-## ⚡ Layer 1: Fast Metadata Scan (10-20 seconds)
-
-**Purpose:** Detect framework, language, build tool, and existing AI configurations.
-
-⭐ **Context Links:**
-- Node.js: [package.json](file:///package.json)
-- Python: [requirements.txt](file:///requirements.txt) | [pyproject.toml](file:///pyproject.toml)
-- PHP: [composer.json](file:///composer.json)
-- Go: [go.mod](file:///go.mod)
-- Java: [pom.xml](file:///pom.xml) | [build.gradle](file:///build.gradle)
-
-### 0.1.1 Universal Tech Stack Detection
-**Action:** Use your internal knowledge to detect the language and framework by scanning the root configuration files (package.json, pyproject.toml, etc.).
-
-**Detect (but don't be limited to):**
-- **Node.js:** NestJS, Express, Fastify, etc.
-- **Python:** FastAPI, Django, Flask, etc.
-- **PHP:** Laravel, Symfony, etc.
-- **Java/Kotlin:** Spring Boot, Micronaut, Ktor, etc.
-- **Go:** Gin, Echo, Fiber, etc.
-- **C#/.NET, Ruby, Rust, Elixir.**
-
-### 0.1.2 Find AI & Documentation
-- Find existing AI configs (`AGENT.md`, `.cursorrules`, etc.)
-- Scan for `README.md` and existing `docs/`.
-
-### Layer 1 Output
-Show a summary of detected Name, Language, Framework, ORM, and Documentation files.
-
----
-
-## 0.2 Layer 2: Structural Analysis (30-90 seconds)
-
-**Purpose:** Analyze directory organization and architecture patterns without reading code line-by-line.
-
-### 0.2.1 Pattern Detection
-1. **Identify Pattern:** Feature-based, Layer-based, Modular Monolith, or Hybrid.
-2. **Entity Detection:** Scan for Schema/Entity files based on the detected ORM (Prisma, TypeORM, Django Models, etc.).
-3. **Maturity Check:** Assess documentation and test coverage ratio.
-
-### Layer 2 Output
-Summary of Architecture Pattern, Code Structure counts (Controllers, Services, etc.), and Recommended Build Scope (MVP/Production/Enterprise).
-
----
-
-## 0.3 Layer 3: Selective Deep Analysis (1-5 minutes, OPTIONAL)
-
-**Purpose:** Read and parse representative code files for detailed insights into API endpoints, data relationships, and security patterns.
-
-### 0.3.1 Areas of Analysis
-- **API Endpoints:** Parse routes/controllers.
-- **Data Model:** Map entity relationships.
-- **Security:** Detect auth patterns (JWT, OAuth), validation (Zod, Pydantic), and middleware.
-
-### 0.3.2 Sampling Strategy
-Use stratified sampling to read only the most relevant files (e.g., core controllers and entities) to stay within context limits.
-
----
-
-## ✅ Validation & Synthesis
-
-### Present Findings
-Show the final "🔍 BACKEND STACK DETECTED" report and ask for confirmation.
-
-### 💾 Cache & Pre-populate
-
-**Create directory structure (if not exists):**
-```bash
-mkdir -p .ai-flow/cache
-```
-
-1. **Export:** Save results to `.ai-flow/cache/docs-analysis.json`.
-2. **Pre-populate:** Fill answers for Phases 1-7 based on detected data.
-
----
-
-## 0.4 Layer 4: Documentation Audit (30-90s, CONDITIONAL)
-
-**Trigger:** Only if `docs/` or `specs/` directories exist with content.
-
-**Purpose:** Validate existing documentation against implemented code to detect inconsistencies.
-
-### 0.4.1 Ask User Permission
-
-```
-📚 Existing documentation detected (12 files in docs/, 3 in specs/)
-
-Would you like to audit documentation vs code?
-A) Yes, audit and show inconsistencies (recommended) ⭐
-B) No, skip audit (continue to Phase 1)
-
-> _
-```
-
-**If user selects B:** Skip to section 0.5 (Validation & Synthesis).
-
-### 0.4.2 Parse Existing Documentation
-
-**Action:** Extract documented information from:
-- `docs/architecture.md` → Architecture patterns
-- `docs/data-model.md` → Entities and fields
-- `docs/api.md` → Endpoints and methods
-- `specs/requirements.md` → Business requirements
-
-**Save to:** `.ai-flow/cache/docs-snapshot.json`
-
-### 0.4.3 Compare Code vs Documentation
-
-**Compare:**
-1. **Entities:** Schema files (Prisma, TypeORM, etc.) vs `docs/data-model.md`
-2. **Endpoints:** Controllers/Routes vs `docs/api.md`
-3. **Architecture:** Code structure vs `docs/architecture.md`
-4. **Tech Stack:** `package.json` vs documented stack
-
-**Detect:**
-- Items in code but not in docs (undocumented features)
-- Items in docs but not in code (missing implementations or obsolete docs)
-- Mismatches in fields, types, or patterns
-
-### 0.4.4 Classify Inconsistencies
-
-**Severity Levels:**
-
-🔴 **CRITICAL** (Requires user decision):
-- Documented entity/endpoint not implemented
-- Major architectural mismatch
-
-🟡 **MEDIUM** (Auto-correctable with confirmation):
-- Implemented endpoint not documented
-- Missing fields in docs
-
-🟢 **LOW** (Auto-correctable):
-- Obsolete fields in docs
-- Outdated version numbers
-
-### 0.4.5 Generate Audit Summary
-
-**Output:** Concise summary (full report saved for later).
-
-```
----
-📊 Documentation Audit Summary
-
-Consistency Score: 72%
-
-🔴 Critical: 2 issues
-  - Entity 'Category' documented but not in schema
-  - Endpoint POST /api/auth/register documented but missing
-
-🟡 Medium: 5 issues
-  - 3 endpoints implemented but not documented
-  - 2 entity fields missing in docs
-
-🟢 Minor: 3 issues
-  - 3 obsolete fields in documentation
-
-💡 Recommendation:
-  - Review critical issues before continuing
-  - Full audit report will be generated in Phase 8
-  - Auto-corrections can be applied after Phase 8
----
-```
-
-### 0.4.6 Handle Critical Issues (If Any)
-
-**If critical issues found:**
-
-```
-⚠️ Critical inconsistencies detected!
-
-How would you like to proceed?
-A) Continue to Phase 1 (address issues later in Phase 8) ⭐
-B) Review critical issues now (interactive)
-C) Cancel /flow-build (fix manually first)
-
-> _
-```
-
-**Option A (Recommended):** Continue to Phase 1
-- Save audit data for Phase 8
-- Phase 8 will offer to apply corrections
-
-**Option B:** Interactive review now
-```
-🔴 Critical Issue 1/2: Entity 'Category'
-   Documented in docs/data-model.md but NOT in schema
-
-   What should we do?
-   A) Mark as "To Implement" (add to roadmap)
-   B) Mark as "Obsolete" (remove from docs in Phase 8)
-   C) Skip for now
-
-> _
-```
-
-**Option C:** Cancel
-- User fixes issues manually
-- Re-run `/flow-build` later
-
-### 0.4.7 Save Audit Data
-
-> **📌 IMPORTANT - Phases 9-10 for Existing Projects:**
-> 
-> If the project has **substantial functional code already implemented** (detected in Layer 1-3):
-> - Set `phase9.recommendation = "SKIP"` with reason: "Project already implemented - roadmap not needed"
-> - Set `phase10.recommendation = "SKIP"` with reason: "Project already implemented - user stories not needed"
-> 
-> **Phases 9-10 are only useful for:**
-> - New projects (no code yet)
-> - Projects in early development (< 30% features implemented)
-> 
-> **For existing projects**, focus on Phases 1-8 (documentation sync) instead.
-
-**Save to:** `.ai-flow/cache/audit-data.json`
-
-```json
-{
-  "auditPerformed": true,
-  "timestamp": "2025-12-22T16:43:00Z",
-  "consistencyScore": 72,
-  "critical": 2,
-  "medium": 5,
-  "minor": 3,
-  "userDecisions": {
-    "Category": "obsolete",
-    "POST /api/auth/register": "to_implement"
-  },
-  "phases": {
-    "phase1": {
-      "file": "project-brief.md",
-      "exists": true,
-      "consistencyScore": 100,
-      "recommendation": "SKIP",
-      "gaps": [],
-      "reason": "Complete business context documented"
-    },
-    "phase2": {
-      "file": "docs/data-model.md",
-      "exists": true,
-      "consistencyScore": 98,
-      "recommendation": "SKIP",
-      "gaps": [],
-      "reason": "All entities documented and match schema"
-    },
-    "phase3": {
-      "file": "docs/architecture.md",
-      "exists": true,
-      "consistencyScore": 87,
-      "recommendation": "HYBRID",
-      "gaps": ["api_versioning", "rate_limiting"],
-      "reason": "Architecture documented but missing 2 details"
-    },
-    "phase4": {
-      "file": "specs/security.md",
-      "exists": true,
-      "consistencyScore": 95,
-      "recommendation": "SKIP",
-      "gaps": [],
-      "reason": "Security patterns match implementation"
-    },
-    "phase5": {
-      "file": "docs/code-standards.md",
-      "exists": true,
-      "consistencyScore": 92,
-      "recommendation": "SKIP",
-      "gaps": [],
-      "reason": "Standards documented and enforced"
-    },
-    "phase6": {
-      "file": "docs/testing.md",
-      "exists": true,
-      "consistencyScore": 90,
-      "recommendation": "SKIP",
-      "gaps": [],
-      "reason": "Testing strategy documented"
-    },
-    "phase7": {
-      "file": "docs/deployment.md",
-      "exists": true,
-      "consistencyScore": 82,
-      "recommendation": "HYBRID",
-      "gaps": ["monitoring_strategy", "incident_runbooks"],
-      "reason": "Deployment documented but missing operational details"
-    },
-    "phase8": {
-      "file": "AGENT.md",
-      "exists": true,
-      "consistencyScore": 95,
-      "recommendation": "SKIP",
-      "gaps": [],
-      "reason": "Final documentation complete and up-to-date"
-    },
-    "phase9": {
-      "file": "planning/roadmap.md",
-      "exists": false,
-      "consistencyScore": 0,
-      "recommendation": "SKIP",
-      "gaps": [],
-      "reason": "Project already implemented - roadmap not needed for existing code"
-    },
-    "phase10": {
-      "file": "planning/user-stories/",
-      "exists": false,
-      "consistencyScore": 0,
-      "recommendation": "SKIP",
-      "gaps": [],
-      "reason": "Project already implemented - user stories not needed for existing features"
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**Recommendation Logic:**
-- **SKIP** (≥95%): Phase can be skipped, use existing docs
-- **HYBRID** (80-94%): Ask only missing questions, merge with existing docs
-- **FULL** (<80% or file missing): Execute full phase with pre-filled answers
-
-This data will be used in Phases 1-7 to:
-1. Determine if phase can be skipped
-2. Identify specific gaps to ask about
-3. Merge new answers with existing documentation
-
-This data will be used in Phase 8 to:
-1. Generate detailed audit report
-2. Apply auto-corrections
-3. Update roadmap with "To Implement" items
-
----
-
-## 0.5 Validation & Synthesis
-
-### Present Findings
-
-Show the final report including:
-1. **🔍 BACKEND STACK DETECTED** (from Layers 1-3)
-2. **📊 Documentation Audit Summary** (from Layer 4, if executed)
-
-Ask for confirmation to proceed to Phase 1.
-
-### 💾 Cache & Pre-populate
-
-**Create directory structure (if not exists):**
-```bash
-mkdir -p .ai-flow/cache .ai-flow/work .ai-flow/archive
-```
-
-1. **Export code analysis:** `.ai-flow/cache/docs-analysis.json`
-2. **Export audit data:** `.ai-flow/cache/audit-data.json` (if Layer 4 executed)
-3. **Pre-populate:** Fill answers for Phases 1-7 based on detected data
-
-### 🎯 Set Flags for Phase 8
-
-If documentation audit was performed:
-- Set flag: `auditPerformed: true`
-- Phase 8 will:
-  - Generate detailed audit report (`docs/audit-report.md`)
-  - Offer to apply auto-corrections (🟡 Medium + 🟢 Low)
-  - Update roadmap with "To Implement" items (🔴 Critical marked as such)
-
----
-
-✅ **Phase 0 Complete: Context Analysis Finalized**
-
----
-
-### Phase Summary
-- Pre-populated detected tech stack values.
-- Architectural patterns identified.
-- Context cached in `.ai-flow/cache/docs-analysis.json`.
-- **Documentation audit completed** (if existing docs found).
-- **Inconsistencies flagged** for Phase 8 resolution.
-
----
-
-**Next Phase:** Phase 1 - Discovery & Business Requirements
-
-**What happens next:**
-- Phase 1-7 will use pre-populated answers (40-60% filled)
-- You'll only answer questions that couldn't be auto-detected
-- Phase 8 will offer to resolve documentation inconsistencies
-
-Read: `.ai-flow/prompts/backend/flow-build-phase-1.md`
-
----
-_Version: 4.3 (Antigravity Optimized - With Integrated Audit)_
-_Last Updated: 2025-12-22_
+## PHASE 0: Context Discovery (2-5 min)
+
+> **Order for this phase:** ALWAYS executed FIRST if an existing project is detected. Skip ONLY for new projects.
+
+> **📌 Scope-based behavior:**
+> - **Interactive Mode:** Ask user for permission to scan files layer by layer.
+> - **Autonomous Mode:** Scan all layers automatically and present the final report.
+
+### Objective
+Efficiently analyze existing projects using a **layered, incremental approach**.
+
+---
+
+## 🚫 Critical Exclusion Rules
+To avoid false-positive detections, **IGNORE** the following folders and files during all detection steps:
+- `.ai-flow/work/` (contains active development tasks)
+- `.ai-flow/archive/` (contains completed tasks)
+- `.agent/` (contains AI workflows)
+- `docs/` and `specs/` (if they contain AI Flow generated documentation)
+- `planning/` (if it contains AI Flow generated roadmap and user stories)
+- `project-brief.md`, `ai-instructions.md`, `AGENT.md`
+
+**A project is considered "Existing" only if it contains functional source code or framework configuration files OUTSIDE these excluded paths.**
+
+---
+
+## 0.0 Check for Existing Analysis (Layer 0)
+
+Check if `.ai-flow/cache/docs-analysis.json` exists and is fresh.
+
+**If found:**
+Ask user to use cached analysis or re-analyze.
+
+**If not found:**
+Proceed to Layer 1.
+
+---
+
+// turbo
+## ⚡ Layer 1: Fast Metadata Scan (10-20 seconds)
+
+**Purpose:** Detect framework, language, build tool, and existing AI configurations.
+
+⭐ **Context Links:**
+- Node.js: [package.json](file:///package.json)
+- Python: [requirements.txt](file:///requirements.txt) | [pyproject.toml](file:///pyproject.toml)
+- PHP: [composer.json](file:///composer.json)
+- Go: [go.mod](file:///go.mod)
+- Java: [pom.xml](file:///pom.xml) | [build.gradle](file:///build.gradle)
+
+### 0.1.1 Universal Tech Stack Detection
+**Action:** Use your internal knowledge to detect the language and framework by scanning the root configuration files (package.json, pyproject.toml, etc.).
+
+**Detect (but don't be limited to):**
+- **Node.js:** NestJS, Express, Fastify, etc.
+- **Python:** FastAPI, Django, Flask, etc.
+- **PHP:** Laravel, Symfony, etc.
+- **Java/Kotlin:** Spring Boot, Micronaut, Ktor, etc.
+- **Go:** Gin, Echo, Fiber, etc.
+- **C#/.NET, Ruby, Rust, Elixir.**
+
+### 0.1.2 Find AI & Documentation
+- Find existing AI configs (`AGENT.md`, `.cursorrules`, etc.)
+- Scan for `README.md` and existing `docs/`.
+
+### Layer 1 Output
+Show a summary of detected Name, Language, Framework, ORM, and Documentation files.
+
+---
+
+## 0.2 Layer 2: Structural Analysis (30-90 seconds)
+
+**Purpose:** Analyze directory organization and architecture patterns without reading code line-by-line.
+
+### 0.2.1 Pattern Detection
+1. **Identify Pattern:** Feature-based, Layer-based, Modular Monolith, or Hybrid.
+2. **Entity Detection:** Scan for Schema/Entity files based on the detected ORM (Prisma, TypeORM, Django Models, etc.).
+3. **Maturity Check:** Assess documentation and test coverage ratio.
+
+### Layer 2 Output
+Summary of Architecture Pattern, Code Structure counts (Controllers, Services, etc.), and Recommended Build Scope (MVP/Production/Enterprise).
+
+---
+
+## 0.3 Layer 3: Selective Deep Analysis (1-5 minutes, OPTIONAL)
+
+**Purpose:** Read and parse representative code files for detailed insights into API endpoints, data relationships, and security patterns.
+
+### 0.3.1 Areas of Analysis
+- **API Endpoints:** Parse routes/controllers.
+- **Data Model:** Map entity relationships.
+- **Security:** Detect auth patterns (JWT, OAuth), validation (Zod, Pydantic), and middleware.
+
+### 0.3.2 Sampling Strategy
+Use stratified sampling to read only the most relevant files (e.g., core controllers and entities) to stay within context limits.
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Validation & Synthesis
+
+### Present Findings
+Show the final "🔍 BACKEND STACK DETECTED" report and ask for confirmation.
+
+### 💾 Cache & Pre-populate
+
+**Create directory structure (if not exists):**
+```bash
+mkdir -p .ai-flow/cache
+```
+
+1. **Export:** Save results to `.ai-flow/cache/docs-analysis.json`.
+2. **Pre-populate:** Fill answers for Phases 1-7 based on detected data.
+
+---
+
+## 0.4 Layer 4: Documentation Audit (30-90s, CONDITIONAL)
+
+**Trigger:** Only if `docs/` or `specs/` directories exist with content.
+
+**Purpose:** Validate existing documentation against implemented code to detect inconsistencies.
+
+### 0.4.1 Ask User Permission
+
+```
+📚 Existing documentation detected (12 files in docs/, 3 in specs/)
+
+Would you like to audit documentation vs code?
+A) Yes, audit and show inconsistencies (recommended) ⭐
+B) No, skip audit (continue to Phase 1)
+
+> _
+```
+
+**If user selects B:** Skip to section 0.5 (Validation & Synthesis).
+
+### 0.4.2 Parse Existing Documentation
+
+**Action:** Extract documented information from:
+- `docs/architecture.md` → Architecture patterns
+- `docs/data-model.md` → Entities and fields
+- `docs/api.md` → Endpoints and methods
+- `specs/requirements.md` → Business requirements
+
+**Save to:** `.ai-flow/cache/docs-snapshot.json`
+
+### 0.4.3 Compare Code vs Documentation
+
+**Compare:**
+1. **Entities:** Schema files (Prisma, TypeORM, etc.) vs `docs/data-model.md`
+2. **Endpoints:** Controllers/Routes vs `docs/api.md`
+3. **Architecture:** Code structure vs `docs/architecture.md`
+4. **Tech Stack:** `package.json` vs documented stack
+
+**Detect:**
+- Items in code but not in docs (undocumented features)
+- Items in docs but not in code (missing implementations or obsolete docs)
+- Mismatches in fields, types, or patterns
+
+### 0.4.4 Classify Inconsistencies
+
+**Severity Levels:**
+
+🔴 **CRITICAL** (Requires user decision):
+- Documented entity/endpoint not implemented
+- Major architectural mismatch
+
+🟡 **MEDIUM** (Auto-correctable with confirmation):
+- Implemented endpoint not documented
+- Missing fields in docs
+
+🟢 **LOW** (Auto-correctable):
+- Obsolete fields in docs
+- Outdated version numbers
+
+### 0.4.5 Generate Audit Summary
+
+**Output:** Concise summary (full report saved for later).
+
+```
+---
+📊 Documentation Audit Summary
+
+Consistency Score: 72%
+
+🔴 Critical: 2 issues
+  - Entity 'Category' documented but not in schema
+  - Endpoint POST /api/auth/register documented but missing
+
+🟡 Medium: 5 issues
+  - 3 endpoints implemented but not documented
+  - 2 entity fields missing in docs
+
+🟢 Minor: 3 issues
+  - 3 obsolete fields in documentation
+
+💡 Recommendation:
+  - Review critical issues before continuing
+  - Full audit report will be generated in Phase 8
+  - Auto-corrections can be applied after Phase 8
+---
+```
+
+### 0.4.6 Handle Critical Issues (If Any)
+
+**If critical issues found:**
+
+```
+⚠️ Critical inconsistencies detected!
+
+How would you like to proceed?
+A) Continue to Phase 1 (address issues later in Phase 8) ⭐
+B) Review critical issues now (interactive)
+C) Cancel /flow-build (fix manually first)
+
+> _
+```
+
+**Option A (Recommended):** Continue to Phase 1
+- Save audit data for Phase 8
+- Phase 8 will offer to apply corrections
+
+**Option B:** Interactive review now
+```
+🔴 Critical Issue 1/2: Entity 'Category'
+   Documented in docs/data-model.md but NOT in schema
+
+   What should we do?
+   A) Mark as "To Implement" (add to roadmap)
+   B) Mark as "Obsolete" (remove from docs in Phase 8)
+   C) Skip for now
+
+> _
+```
+
+**Option C:** Cancel
+- User fixes issues manually
+- Re-run `/flow-build` later
+
+### 0.4.7 Save Audit Data
+
+> **📌 IMPORTANT - Phases 9-10 for Existing Projects:**
+> 
+> If the project has **substantial functional code already implemented** (detected in Layer 1-3):
+> - Set `phase9.recommendation = "SKIP"` with reason: "Project already implemented - roadmap not needed"
+> - Set `phase10.recommendation = "SKIP"` with reason: "Project already implemented - user stories not needed"
+> 
+> **Phases 9-10 are only useful for:**
+> - New projects (no code yet)
+> - Projects in early development (< 30% features implemented)
+> 
+> **For existing projects**, focus on Phases 1-8 (documentation sync) instead.
+
+**Save to:** `.ai-flow/cache/audit-data.json`
+
+```json
+{
+  "auditPerformed": true,
+  "timestamp": "2025-12-22T16:43:00Z",
+  "consistencyScore": 72,
+  "critical": 2,
+  "medium": 5,
+  "minor": 3,
+  "userDecisions": {
+    "Category": "obsolete",
+    "POST /api/auth/register": "to_implement"
+  },
+  "phases": {
+    "phase1": {
+      "file": "project-brief.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "consistencyScore": 100,
+      "recommendation": "SKIP",
+      "gaps": [],
+      "reason": "Complete business context documented"
+    },
+    "phase2": {
+      "file": "docs/data-model.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "consistencyScore": 98,
+      "recommendation": "SKIP",
+      "gaps": [],
+      "reason": "All entities documented and match schema"
+    },
+    "phase3": {
+      "file": "docs/architecture.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "consistencyScore": 87,
+      "recommendation": "HYBRID",
+      "gaps": ["api_versioning", "rate_limiting"],
+      "reason": "Architecture documented but missing 2 details"
+    },
+    "phase4": {
+      "file": "specs/security.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "consistencyScore": 95,
+      "recommendation": "SKIP",
+      "gaps": [],
+      "reason": "Security patterns match implementation"
+    },
+    "phase5": {
+      "file": "docs/code-standards.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "consistencyScore": 92,
+      "recommendation": "SKIP",
+      "gaps": [],
+      "reason": "Standards documented and enforced"
+    },
+    "phase6": {
+      "file": "docs/testing.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "consistencyScore": 90,
+      "recommendation": "SKIP",
+      "gaps": [],
+      "reason": "Testing strategy documented"
+    },
+    "phase7": {
+      "file": "docs/deployment.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "consistencyScore": 82,
+      "recommendation": "HYBRID",
+      "gaps": ["monitoring_strategy", "incident_runbooks"],
+      "reason": "Deployment documented but missing operational details"
+    },
+    "phase8": {
+      "file": "AGENT.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "consistencyScore": 95,
+      "recommendation": "SKIP",
+      "gaps": [],
+      "reason": "Final documentation complete and up-to-date"
+    },
+    "phase9": {
+      "file": "planning/roadmap.md",
+      "exists": false,
+      "consistencyScore": 0,
+      "recommendation": "SKIP",
+      "gaps": [],
+      "reason": "Project already implemented - roadmap not needed for existing code"
+    },
+    "phase10": {
+      "file": "planning/user-stories/",
+      "exists": false,
+      "consistencyScore": 0,
+      "recommendation": "SKIP",
+      "gaps": [],
+      "reason": "Project already implemented - user stories not needed for existing features"
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Recommendation Logic:**
+- **SKIP** (≥95%): Phase can be skipped, use existing docs
+- **HYBRID** (80-94%): Ask only missing questions, merge with existing docs
+- **FULL** (<80% or file missing): Execute full phase with pre-filled answers
+
+This data will be used in Phases 1-7 to:
+1. Determine if phase can be skipped
+2. Identify specific gaps to ask about
+3. Merge new answers with existing documentation
+
+This data will be used in Phase 8 to:
+1. Generate detailed audit report
+2. Apply auto-corrections
+3. Update roadmap with "To Implement" items
+
+---
+
+## 0.5 Validation & Synthesis
+
+### Present Findings
+
+Show the final report including:
+1. **🔍 BACKEND STACK DETECTED** (from Layers 1-3)
+2. **📊 Documentation Audit Summary** (from Layer 4, if executed)
+
+Ask for confirmation to proceed to Phase 1.
+
+### 💾 Cache & Pre-populate
+
+**Create directory structure (if not exists):**
+```bash
+mkdir -p .ai-flow/cache .ai-flow/work .ai-flow/archive
+```
+
+1. **Export code analysis:** `.ai-flow/cache/docs-analysis.json`
+2. **Export audit data:** `.ai-flow/cache/audit-data.json` (if Layer 4 executed)
+3. **Pre-populate:** Fill answers for Phases 1-7 based on detected data
+
+### 🎯 Set Flags for Phase 8
+
+If documentation audit was performed:
+- Set flag: `auditPerformed: true`
+- Phase 8 will:
+  - Generate detailed audit report (`docs/audit-report.md`)
+  - Offer to apply auto-corrections (🟡 Medium + 🟢 Low)
+  - Update roadmap with "To Implement" items (🔴 Critical marked as such)
+
+---
+
+✅ **Phase 0 Complete: Context Analysis Finalized**
+
+---
+
+### Phase Summary
+- Pre-populated detected tech stack values.
+- Architectural patterns identified.
+- Context cached in `.ai-flow/cache/docs-analysis.json`.
+- **Documentation audit completed** (if existing docs found).
+- **Inconsistencies flagged** for Phase 8 resolution.
+
+---
+
+**Next Phase:** Phase 1 - Discovery & Business Requirements
+
+**What happens next:**
+- Phase 1-7 will use pre-populated answers (40-60% filled)
+- You'll only answer questions that couldn't be auto-detected
+- Phase 8 will offer to resolve documentation inconsistencies
+
+Read: `.ai-flow/prompts/backend/flow-build-phase-1.md`
+
+---
+_Version: 4.3 (Antigravity Optimized - With Integrated Audit)_
+_Last Updated: 2025-12-22_