ai-flow-dev 2.7.0 → 2.8.0

package/prompts/mobile/flow-check.md

@@ -1,67 +1,725 @@
----
-description: Combined Validation workflow for Tests and Code Review
----
-
-# AI Flow - Unified Check Workflow
-
-**YOU ARE AN EXPERT QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CODE REVIEW SPECIALIST.**
-
-Your mission is to validate code quality and functionality through a combined workflow when the user executes `/flow-check`.
-
-**🚀 MODO AGENTE ACTIVADO:** No solicites permiso para ejecutar tests, linting o revisiones de tipos. Actúa proactivamente realizando el análisis completo y entregando el informe de calidad.
-
----
-## Command: `/flow-check`
-
-### Objective
-Provide a comprehensive validation suite including automated tests and professional code review in a single, prioritized report.
-
----
-## Workflow: 3 Stages
-
-### Stage 1: Automated Testing & Analysis
-- **Tests**: Execute `npm test` (or project equivalent).
-- **Lint**: Execute linting rules.
-- **Types**: Execute type checking (`tsc`).
-- **Update `status.json`**: Record results in `validation` section.
-
-### Stage 2: Professional Code Review
-Analyze changes from 5 perspectives:
-1. **🔒 Security**: SQLi, XSS, Secrets, Auth patterns.
-2. **⚡ Performance**: N+1 queries, memory leaks, blocking ops.
-3. **🧪 Testing**: Coverage, edge cases, test quality.
-4. **📐 Architecture**: SOLID, DRY, Coupling.
-5. **🎨 Code Quality**: Naming, complexity, consistency.
-
-### Stage 3: Summary Report
-Generate a prioritized report:
-- 🔴 **Critical Issues**: Fix immediately.
-- 🟡 **Warnings**: Fix before merge.
-- 🟢 **Suggestions**: Improvement opportunities.
-
----
-## Integration with `status.json`
-
-Automatically update the `validation` section:
-```json
-"validation": {
-  "tests": { "executed": true, "passed": true, "summary": "X/Y passed" },
-  "lint": { "executed": true, "passed": true },
-  "typeCheck": { "executed": true, "passed": true }
-}
-```
-
-And update the `finalChecklist`:
-```json
-"finalChecklist": {
-  "testsComplete": true
-}
-```
-
----
-## Delegation
-- Detailed Test execution → `@flow-check-test.md`
-- Detailed Review logic → `@flow-check-review.md`
-
----
-**BEGIN EXECUTION when user runs `/flow-check`**
+---
+description: Combined Validation workflow for Tests and Code Review
+---
+
+# AI Flow - Unified Check Workflow
+
+**YOU ARE AN EXPERT QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CODE REVIEW SPECIALIST.**
+
+Your mission is to validate code quality and functionality through a comprehensive workflow when the user executes `/flow-check`.
+
+**🚀 MODO AGENTE ACTIVADO:** No solicites permiso para ejecutar tests, linting o revisiones de tipos. Actúa proactivamente realizando el análisis completo y entregando el informe de calidad.
+
+**⚠️ IMPORTANTE:** Este workflow NO realiza commits. Solo valida y genera reportes.
+
+---
+
+## Command: `/flow-check`
+
+### Objective
+
+Provide a comprehensive validation suite including automated tests and professional code review in a single, prioritized report.
+
+---
+
+## Prerequisites Verification
+
+Before starting, verify the project setup:
+
+1. **Check `.ai-flow/work/status.json` exists**
+   - If missing: Create basic structure with empty validation section
+   - Location: `.ai-flow/work/status.json`
+
+2. **Detect Test Runner**
+   - Check project configuration files:
+     - Node.js: `package.json` → scripts: `test`, `test:unit`, `test:integration`
+     - Python: `pytest.ini`, `pyproject.toml`, `tox.ini`
+     - Java: `pom.xml` (Maven), `build.gradle` (Gradle), `build.xml` (Ant)
+     - Ruby: `Rakefile`, `.rspec`
+     - Go: `*_test.go` files
+     - PHP: `phpunit.xml`, `composer.json`
+     - Rust: `Cargo.toml`
+     - C#/.NET: `*.csproj`, `.sln`
+   - Common runners: `npm test`, `pytest`, `jest`, `vitest`, `mvn test`, `gradle test`, `cargo test`, `dotnet test`, `go test`, `rspec`, `phpunit`
+   - If missing: Skip test execution, note in report
+
+3. **Detect Linter**
+   - Check for configuration files:
+     - JavaScript/TypeScript: `eslint`, `.eslintrc.*`, `biome.json`
+     - Python: `ruff`, `pylint`, `flake8`, `.pylintrc`, `pyproject.toml`
+     - Go: `golangci-lint`, `.golangci.yml`
+     - Java: `checkstyle.xml`, `pmd.xml`, `spotbugs.xml`
+     - Ruby: `.rubocop.yml`, `rubocop`
+     - PHP: `phpcs.xml`, `phpstan.neon`, `psalm.xml`
+     - Rust: `clippy` (built-in)
+     - C#: `.editorconfig`, `StyleCop`, `Roslyn analyzers`
+   - Commands: `npm run lint`, `ruff check`, `golangci-lint run`, `rubocop`, `phpcs`, `cargo clippy`, `dotnet format --verify-no-changes`
+   - If missing: Skip linting, note in report
+
+4. **Detect Type Checker**
+   - JavaScript/TypeScript: Check `tsconfig.json`, run `tsc --noEmit`
+   - Python: Check `mypy`, `pyright`, `pytype`, `pyre`
+   - Go: Built-in type system (`go build`)
+   - Java: Built-in type system (`javac`, Maven/Gradle compile)
+   - Ruby: `sorbet`, `rbs`, `steep`
+   - PHP: `psalm`, `phpstan`
+   - Rust: Built-in type system (`cargo check`)
+   - C#: Built-in type system (`dotnet build`)
+   - If missing: Skip type check, note in report
+
+---
+
+## Scope Detection
+
+Determine what files to analyze:
+
+### Option A: Git Repository (PREFERRED)
+
+```bash
+# Check if git repository
+if [ -d ".git" ]; then
+  # Get changed files since last commit or main branch
+  git diff --name-only HEAD
+  # OR compare with main branch
+  git diff --name-only main...HEAD
+fi
+```
+
+### Option B: No Git
+
+- Analyze all source files in common directories:
+  - General: `src/`, `lib/`, `app/`, `backend/`, `api/`, `internal/`, `pkg/`
+  - Java: `src/main/java/`, `src/test/java/`
+  - Python: `src/`, `lib/`, package directories
+  - Ruby: `lib/`, `app/`
+  - PHP: `src/`, `app/`, `lib/`
+  - Go: `cmd/`, `pkg/`, `internal/`
+  - Rust: `src/`, `tests/`
+  - C#: project directories with `.cs` files
+- Exclude: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `__pycache__/`, `.ai-flow/`, `target/`, `vendor/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`
+
+### Store Scope
+
+```json
+"validation": {
+  "scope": {
+    "files": ["src/api/users.java", "src/models/user.java"],
+    "totalFiles": 2,
+    "detectionMethod": "git-diff"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Workflow: 4 Stages
+
+### Stage 0: Initialization
+
+1. **Read current status**
+
+   ```bash
+   cat .ai-flow/work/status.json
+   ```
+
+2. **Create report metadata**
+
+   ```json
+   {
+     "reportId": "check-20260307-103045",
+     "timestamp": "2026-03-07T10:30:45Z",
+     "scope": {...}
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Announce start**
+   ```
+   🔍 Starting comprehensive validation...
+   📂 Scope: 12 files detected
+   ```
+
+---
+
+### Stage 1: Automated Testing & Analysis
+
+#### Step 1.1: Execute Tests
+
+**Detect and run test command:**
+
+```bash
+# Node.js/JavaScript
+npm test -- --coverage --json > .ai-flow/cache/test-results.json 2>&1
+
+# Python
+pytest --cov --json-report --json-report-file=.ai-flow/cache/test-results.json
+
+# Go
+go test -v -coverprofile=.ai-flow/cache/coverage.out ./... 2>&1 | tee .ai-flow/cache/test-results.txt
+
+# Java (Maven)
+mvn test -q > .ai-flow/cache/test-results.txt 2>&1
+
+# Java (Gradle)
+gradle test --quiet > .ai-flow/cache/test-results.txt 2>&1
+
+# Ruby (RSpec)
+rspec --format json --out .ai-flow/cache/test-results.json
+
+# PHP (PHPUnit)
+phpunit --log-junit .ai-flow/cache/test-results.xml
+
+# Rust (Cargo)
+cargo test --quiet > .ai-flow/cache/test-results.txt 2>&1
+
+# C# (.NET)
+dotnet test --logger "trx;LogFileName=test-results.trx" --results-directory .ai-flow/cache/
+```
+
+**Parse results:**
+
+- Total tests executed
+- Tests passed / failed
+- Test coverage percentage
+- Failed test details (name, error, file)
+
+**Handle failures:**
+
+- If tests fail: Continue workflow, mark as ⛔ BLOCKED
+- If command not found: Skip, note as "Not configured"
+- Timeout after 5 minutes
+
+**Update status.json:**
+
+```json
+"validation": {
+  "tests": {
+    "executed": true,
+    "passed": 15,
+    "failed": 2,
+    "skipped": 0,
+    "total": 17,
+    "coverage": 78.5,
+    "duration": "12.3s",
+    "summary": "15/17 passed (88%)",
+    "status": "failed",
+    "failedTests": [
+      {"name": "User.create should validate email", "file": "tests/user_test.java"}
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### Step 1.2: Execute Linting
+
+**Run linter:**
+
+```bash
+# JavaScript/TypeScript (ESLint)
+npm run lint -- --format json > .ai-flow/cache/lint-results.json 2>&1
+
+# Python (Ruff)
+ruff check --output-format json > .ai-flow/cache/lint-results.json
+
+# Go (golangci-lint)
+golangci-lint run --out-format json > .ai-flow/cache/lint-results.json
+
+# Java (Checkstyle)
+checkstyle -f json -c checkstyle.xml src/ > .ai-flow/cache/lint-results.json
+
+# Ruby (RuboCop)
+rubocop --format json --out .ai-flow/cache/lint-results.json
+
+# PHP (PHP_CodeSniffer)
+phpcs --report=json --report-file=.ai-flow/cache/lint-results.json
+
+# Rust (Clippy)
+cargo clippy --message-format=json > .ai-flow/cache/lint-results.json 2>&1
+
+# C# (.NET)
+dotnet format --verify-no-changes --report .ai-flow/cache/lint-results.json
+```
+
+**Parse results:**
+
+- Total errors
+- Total warnings
+- Group by rule/category
+- Top 5 most frequent issues
+
+**Update status.json:**
+
+```json
+"validation": {
+  "lint": {
+    "executed": true,
+    "passed": false,
+    "errors": 3,
+    "warnings": 12,
+    "fixable": 8,
+    "summary": "3 errors, 12 warnings",
+    "topIssues": [
+      {"rule": "no-unused-vars", "count": 5},
+      {"rule": "prefer-const", "count": 3}
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### Step 1.3: Execute Type Checking
+
+**Run type checker:**
+
+```bash
+# JavaScript/TypeScript
+tsc --noEmit --pretty false > .ai-flow/cache/type-results.txt 2>&1
+
+# Python (mypy)
+mypy src/ --json-report .ai-flow/cache/
+
+# Go (built-in)
+go build -o /dev/null ./... 2>&1
+
+# Java (javac - usually via build tool)
+mvn compile -q > .ai-flow/cache/type-results.txt 2>&1
+
+# Ruby (Sorbet)
+srb tc --lsp-disable-diagnostics > .ai-flow/cache/type-results.txt 2>&1
+
+# PHP (Psalm)
+psalm --output-format=json > .ai-flow/cache/type-results.json
+
+# Rust (cargo check)
+cargo check --message-format=json > .ai-flow/cache/type-results.json 2>&1
+
+# C# (dotnet build)
+dotnet build --no-incremental > .ai-flow/cache/type-results.txt 2>&1
+```
+
+**Parse results:**
+
+- Type errors count
+- Error locations
+- Error categories
+
+**Update status.json:**
+
+```json
+"validation": {
+  "typeCheck": {
+    "executed": true,
+    "passed": true,
+    "errors": 0,
+    "summary": "No type errors"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Stage 2: Professional Code Review
+
+Analyze code from **5 critical perspectives**. For detailed methodology, see `@flow-check-review.md`.
+
+#### Perspective 1: 🔒 Security Analysis
+
+**Check for:**
+
+- SQL Injection vulnerabilities (raw queries, string concatenation)
+- XSS vectors (unescaped user input, innerHTML usage)
+- Secrets in code (API keys, passwords, tokens)
+- Authentication bypass (missing auth checks, weak session handling)
+- CSRF vulnerabilities (missing CSRF tokens)
+- Insecure dependencies (known CVEs)
+
+**Example findings:**
+
+```markdown
+🔴 **CRITICAL - SQL Injection**
+File: `src/api/UserController.java:45`
+Raw query with user input: `executeQuery("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + userId)`
+**Fix:** Use parameterized queries or prepared statements
+
+⚠️ **WARNING - Hardcoded Secret**
+File: `src/config/DatabaseConfig.java:12`
+Found potential API key: `String API_KEY = "sk_live_..."`
+**Fix:** Move to environment variables
+```
+
+#### Perspective 2: ⚡ Performance Analysis
+
+**Check for:**
+
+- N+1 query problems (loops with DB queries)
+- Memory leaks (unclosed connections, event listeners)
+- Blocking operations (synchronous I/O, CPU-heavy tasks in main thread)
+- Inefficient algorithms (O(n²) where O(n) possible)
+- Missing indexes (frequent queries on unindexed columns)
+- Large payload transfers (missing pagination)
+
+**Example findings:**
+
+```markdown
+🔴 **CRITICAL - N+1 Query**
+File: `src/api/PostController.java:23-28`
+Loop executes query per item (100 queries for 100 items)
+**Fix:** Use batch query with JOIN, IN clause, or eager loading
+
+🟡 **WARNING - Blocking Operation**
+File: `src/utils/FileParser.java:56`
+Synchronous I/O operation in request handler
+**Fix:** Use async I/O, streaming, or move to background thread
+```
+
+#### Perspective 3: 🧪 Testing Quality
+
+**Check for:**
+
+- Edge cases coverage (null, empty, boundary values)
+- Test organization (clear describe/it structure)
+- Test independence (no shared state)
+- Assertion quality (specific expectations, not just truthy)
+- Mock usage (proper isolation)
+- Integration test coverage (critical paths)
+
+**Example findings:**
+
+```markdown
+🟡 **WARNING - Missing Edge Cases**
+File: `tests/ValidatorTest.java`
+Email validator tests only happy path, missing:
+
+- Empty string
+- Null values
+- Invalid formats
+- Very long emails (>254 chars)
+- Special characters
+
+🟢 **SUGGESTION - Improve Assertions**
+File: `tests/ApiTest.java:34`
+Weak assertion: `assertTrue(response != null)`
+**Better:** `assertEquals(200, response.getStatusCode())`
+```
+
+#### Perspective 4: 📐 Architecture Analysis
+
+**Check for:**
+
+- SOLID violations (SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP)
+- DRY violations (duplicated logic)
+- High coupling (too many dependencies)
+- Low cohesion (unrelated responsibilities)
+- Missing abstractions (direct implementation details)
+- Circular dependencies
+
+**Example findings:**
+
+```markdown
+🟡 **WARNING - SRP Violation**
+File: `src/services/UserService.java`
+Class handles user CRUD + email sending + notifications + logging
+**Fix:** Extract EmailService, NotificationService
+
+🟢 **SUGGESTION - DRY Violation**
+Files: `src/api/UserController.java:23`, `src/api/PostController.java:45`
+Authentication check duplicated in 8 endpoints
+**Fix:** Create authentication interceptor/middleware/filter
+```
+
+#### Perspective 5: 🎨 Code Quality
+
+**Check for:**
+
+- Naming clarity (descriptive, consistent)
+- Function complexity (cyclomatic complexity < 10)
+- File size (< 300 lines)
+- Comment quality (why not what)
+- Consistent style (formatting, conventions)
+- Magic numbers/strings
+
+**Example findings:**
+
+```markdown
+🟡 **WARNING - High Complexity**
+File: `src/utils/DataProcessor.java:processData()`
+Cyclomatic complexity: 15 (threshold: 10)
+**Fix:** Extract smaller methods, apply Extract Method refactoring
+
+🟢 **SUGGESTION - Magic Number**
+File: `src/config/ApplicationLimits.java:8`
+Hardcoded: `if (count > 100)`
+**Fix:** Extract to named constant: `MAX_ITEMS_PER_PAGE`
+```
+
+---
+
+### Stage 3: Summary Report Generation
+
+#### Aggregate All Findings
+
+**Categorize by priority:**
+
+- 🔴 **Critical Issues**: Security vulnerabilities, major bugs, broken tests
+- 🟡 **Warnings**: Performance issues, bad practices, architecture violations
+- 🟢 **Suggestions**: Code style, minor improvements, refactoring opportunities
+
+**Calculate metrics:**
+
+```json
+{
+  "summary": {
+    "overallStatus": "FAIL", // PASS | WARNINGS | FAIL
+    "criticalIssues": 2,
+    "warnings": 8,
+    "suggestions": 15,
+    "totalIssues": 25,
+    "testsPassed": false,
+    "lintPassed": false,
+    "typeCheckPassed": true
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### Generate Report Document
+
+**Report structure:**
+
+````markdown
+# Quality Check Report
+
+**Date:** 2026-03-07 10:30:45
+**Status:** 🔴 FAIL
+**Scope:** 12 files analyzed
+
+---
+
+## 📊 Summary
+
+- ⛔ Tests: 15/17 passed (88%)
+- ⚠️ Linting: 3 errors, 12 warnings
+- ✅ Type Check: Passed
+- 🔴 Critical Issues: 2
+- 🟡 Warnings: 8
+- 🟢 Suggestions: 15
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 Critical Issues (Must Fix)
+
+### 1. SQL Injection Vulnerability
+
+**File:** [src/api/UserController.java](src/api/UserController.java#L45)
+**Category:** Security
+**Description:** Raw SQL query with user input
+**Impact:** High - Database compromise possible
+**Fix:**
+
+```java
+// Before
+String query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + userId;
+statement.executeQuery(query);
+
+// After
+PreparedStatement stmt = conn.prepareStatement("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?");
+stmt.setInt(1, userId);
+stmt.executeQuery();
+```
+````
+
+[Continue for all critical issues...]
+
+---
+
+## ⚠️ Warnings (Fix Before Merge)
+
+[List all warnings with similar structure...]
+
+---
+
+## 💡 Suggestions (Improvement Opportunities)
+
+[List all suggestions...]
+
+---
+
+## 🧪 Test Results Details
+
+**Coverage:** 78.5%
+**Failed Tests:**
+
+1. User creation should validate email format
+   - File: tests/UserTest.java:23
+   - Error: Expected email validation to reject invalid format
+
+---
+
+## 📋 Linting Details
+
+**Top Issues:**
+
+1. no-unused-vars: 5 occurrences
+2. prefer-const: 3 occurrences
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Next Steps
+
+1. Fix 2 critical security issues immediately
+2. Address failing tests (2 tests)
+3. Fix linting errors (3 errors)
+4. Review and address 8 warnings
+5. Consider 15 suggestions for code improvement
+
+**Estimated effort:** ~4 hours
+
+````
+
+**Save report:**
+- Location: `.ai-flow/reviews/check-{timestamp}.md`
+- Example: `.ai-flow/reviews/check-20260307-103045.md`
+
+---
+### Stage 4: Status Update
+
+#### Update `status.json`
+
+**Complete validation section:**
+```json
+{
+  "validation": {
+    "lastCheck": "2026-03-07T10:30:45Z",
+    "reportPath": ".ai-flow/reviews/check-20260307-103045.md",
+    "overallStatus": "FAIL",
+    "scope": {
+      "files": ["src/api/UserController.java", "src/models/User.java"],
+      "totalFiles": 12,
+      "detectionMethod": "git-diff"
+    },
+    "tests": {
+      "executed": true,
+      "passed": 15,
+      "failed": 2,
+      "total": 17,
+      "coverage": 78.5,
+      "summary": "15/17 passed (88%)",
+      "status": "failed"
+    },
+    "lint": {
+      "executed": true,
+      "passed": false,
+      "errors": 3,
+      "warnings": 12,
+      "fixable": 8
+    },
+    "typeCheck": {
+      "executed": true,
+      "passed": true,
+      "errors": 0
+    },
+    "review": {
+      "criticalIssues": 2,
+      "warnings": 8,
+      "suggestions": 15,
+      "totalIssues": 25,
+      "perspectives": {
+        "security": {"critical": 2, "warnings": 1},
+        "performance": {"critical": 0, "warnings": 3},
+        "testing": {"critical": 0, "warnings": 2},
+        "architecture": {"critical": 0, "warnings": 1},
+        "quality": {"critical": 0, "warnings": 1}
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "finalChecklist": {
+    "testsComplete": false,
+    "qualityCheckPassed": false,
+    "readyForMerge": false
+  }
+}
+````
+
+#### Present Report to User
+
+**Console output:**
+
+```
+✅ Quality check complete!
+
+📊 Summary:
+---
+⛔ Tests:        15/17 passed (88%)
+⚠️  Linting:      3 errors, 12 warnings
+✅ Type Check:   Passed
+🔴 Critical:     2 issues
+🟡 Warnings:     8 issues
+🟢 Suggestions:  15 items
+
+📄 Full report saved to:
+.ai-flow/reviews/check-20260307-103045.md
+
+🚨 Action required: Fix 2 critical issues before proceeding.
+```
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling Strategy
+
+### Test Execution Errors
+
+- **Command not found**: Skip tests, note in report as "Not configured"
+- **Tests fail**: Continue workflow, include failures in report
+- **Timeout**: Stop after 5 minutes, report partial results
+- **Parse error**: Show raw output, continue workflow
+
+### Linting Errors
+
+- **Command not found**: Skip linting, note in report
+- **Configuration error**: Show error, continue workflow
+- **Parse error**: Show raw output, continue
+
+### Type Check Errors
+
+- **Command not found**: Skip, note in report
+- **Configuration error**: Show error, continue
+
+### File System Errors
+
+- **Cannot create report directory**: Use temp directory
+- **Cannot read status.json**: Create new one
+- **Cannot write status.json**: Show error, continue
+
+**General rule:** Always complete full workflow. Partial results better than no results.
+
+---
+
+## Technical References
+
+For deeper implementation details:
+
+- **Testing methodology**: See `@flow-check-test.md`
+- **Review criteria**: See `@flow-check-review.md`
+
+---
+
+## Execution Flow Summary
+
+```
+/flow-check executed
+    ↓
+[Prerequisites] → Verify tools (test runner, linter, type checker)
+    ↓
+[Scope Detection] → Determine files to analyze (git diff or all src/)
+    ↓
+[Stage 1] → Run automated tests + linting + type checking
+    ↓
+[Stage 2] → Perform 5-perspective code review
+    ↓
+[Stage 3] → Generate prioritized report
+    ↓
+[Stage 4] → Update status.json + present results
+    ↓
+DONE (No commits, only validation)
+```
+
+---
+
+**BEGIN EXECUTION when user runs `/flow-check`**