agileflow 3.0.1 → 3.0.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +5 -0
- package/README.md +3 -3
- package/lib/api-server.js +3 -2
- package/lib/flag-detection.js +4 -2
- package/lib/git-operations.js +4 -2
- package/lib/process-executor.js +24 -9
- package/lib/skill-loader.js +11 -3
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/scripts/agileflow-welcome.js +65 -25
- package/scripts/claude-tmux.sh +9 -3
- package/scripts/damage-control-multi-agent.js +14 -10
- package/scripts/lib/bus-utils.js +3 -1
- package/scripts/lib/configure-detect.js +12 -9
- package/scripts/lib/configure-features.js +12 -7
- package/scripts/lib/configure-repair.js +6 -5
- package/scripts/lib/context-formatter.js +13 -3
- package/scripts/lib/damage-control-utils.js +5 -1
- package/scripts/lib/lifecycle-detector.js +5 -3
- package/scripts/lib/process-cleanup.js +8 -4
- package/scripts/lib/scale-detector.js +47 -8
- package/scripts/lib/signal-detectors.js +117 -59
- package/scripts/lib/task-registry.js +5 -1
- package/scripts/lib/team-events.js +4 -4
- package/scripts/messaging-bridge.js +7 -1
- package/scripts/ralph-loop.js +10 -8
- package/scripts/smart-detect.js +32 -11
- package/scripts/team-manager.js +1 -1
- package/scripts/tmux-task-name.sh +75 -0
- package/scripts/tmux-task-watcher.sh +177 -0
- package/src/core/commands/babysit.md +75 -42
- package/src/core/commands/blockers.md +7 -7
- package/src/core/commands/configure.md +5 -36
- package/src/core/commands/discovery/brief.md +363 -0
- package/src/core/commands/discovery/new.md +395 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ideate/new.md +5 -5
- package/src/core/commands/logic/audit.md +5 -5
- package/src/core/commands/review.md +7 -1
- package/src/core/commands/rpi.md +61 -26
- package/src/core/commands/sprint.md +7 -6
- package/src/core/templates/product-brief.md +136 -0
- package/tools/cli/installers/ide/claude-code.js +67 -2
- package/src/core/agents/configuration/archival.md +0 -350
- package/src/core/agents/configuration/attribution.md +0 -343
- package/src/core/agents/configuration/ci.md +0 -1103
- package/src/core/agents/configuration/damage-control.md +0 -375
- package/src/core/agents/configuration/git-config.md +0 -537
- package/src/core/agents/configuration/hooks.md +0 -623
- package/src/core/agents/configuration/precompact.md +0 -302
- package/src/core/agents/configuration/status-line.md +0 -557
- package/src/core/agents/configuration/verify.md +0 -618
- package/src/core/agents/configuration-damage-control.md +0 -259
- package/src/core/agents/configuration-visual-e2e.md +0 -339
|
@@ -636,23 +636,12 @@ Then re-ask the enable/disable question.
|
|
|
636
636
|
</invoke>
|
|
637
637
|
```
|
|
638
638
|
|
|
639
|
-
|
|
639
|
+
Handle each selection directly:
|
|
640
640
|
|
|
641
|
-
|
|
642
|
-
|
|
643
|
-
|
|
644
|
-
|
|
645
|
-
// Damage Control
|
|
646
|
-
Task({ subagent_type: "configuration-damage-control", description: "Configure Damage Control", prompt: "..." })
|
|
647
|
-
|
|
648
|
-
// CI/CD
|
|
649
|
-
Task({ subagent_type: "configuration-ci", description: "Configure CI/CD", prompt: "..." })
|
|
650
|
-
|
|
651
|
-
// Quality Gates - configure TeammateIdle and TaskCompleted hooks
|
|
652
|
-
// Writes gate config to agileflow-metadata.json under quality_gates key
|
|
653
|
-
// Options: enable/disable tests, lint, types gates per hook
|
|
654
|
-
// Sets thresholds for coverage gates
|
|
655
|
-
```
|
|
641
|
+
- **Visual E2E**: `node .agileflow/scripts/agileflow-configure.js --enable=visuale2e`
|
|
642
|
+
- **Damage Control**: `node .agileflow/scripts/agileflow-configure.js --enable=damagecontrol`
|
|
643
|
+
- **CI/CD**: `node .agileflow/scripts/agileflow-configure.js --enable=ci`
|
|
644
|
+
- **Quality Gates**: Update `docs/00-meta/agileflow-metadata.json` under the `quality_gates` key with enable/disable for tests, lint, types gates per hook and coverage thresholds
|
|
656
645
|
|
|
657
646
|
---
|
|
658
647
|
|
|
@@ -984,26 +973,6 @@ The script updates `docs/00-meta/agileflow-metadata.json`:
|
|
|
984
973
|
}
|
|
985
974
|
```
|
|
986
975
|
|
|
987
|
-
## Complex Features (Spawn Agents)
|
|
988
|
-
|
|
989
|
-
For features needing extra user input, spawn specialized agents:
|
|
990
|
-
|
|
991
|
-
```javascript
|
|
992
|
-
// CI/CD - needs provider and commands
|
|
993
|
-
Task({
|
|
994
|
-
subagent_type: "agileflow-configuration:ci",
|
|
995
|
-
description: "Configure CI/CD",
|
|
996
|
-
prompt: "Set up CI/CD workflow. Ask for provider (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI) and commands."
|
|
997
|
-
})
|
|
998
|
-
|
|
999
|
-
// Git config - needs remote URL
|
|
1000
|
-
Task({
|
|
1001
|
-
subagent_type: "agileflow-configuration:git-config",
|
|
1002
|
-
description: "Configure git",
|
|
1003
|
-
prompt: "Set up git remote. Ask for URL."
|
|
1004
|
-
})
|
|
1005
|
-
```
|
|
1006
|
-
|
|
1007
976
|
## Rules
|
|
1008
977
|
|
|
1009
978
|
1. **Always show detection first** - User sees current state before changes
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,363 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Synthesize ideation and research findings into a structured Product Brief
|
|
3
|
+
argument-hint: "TOPIC=<text> [IDEATION=<path>] [RESEARCH=<path,...>]"
|
|
4
|
+
compact_context:
|
|
5
|
+
priority: critical
|
|
6
|
+
preserve_rules:
|
|
7
|
+
- "ACTIVE COMMAND: /agileflow:discovery:brief - Product Brief synthesis"
|
|
8
|
+
- "MUST read ideation report and/or research files as input"
|
|
9
|
+
- "MUST generate a Product Brief using the product-brief template structure"
|
|
10
|
+
- "MoSCoW mapping: HIGH-confidence ideas = MUST HAVE, single-expert ideas = SHOULD HAVE"
|
|
11
|
+
- "MUST include: Executive Summary, Personas, MoSCoW Features, Success Metrics, ROI, Risks"
|
|
12
|
+
- "Output: docs/08-project/briefs/{YYYYMMDD}-{topic-slug}-brief.md"
|
|
13
|
+
- "If no ideation/research files provided, search docs/08-project/ideation/ and docs/10-research/ for recent files"
|
|
14
|
+
- "After brief generation, offer: create epic, refine, or done"
|
|
15
|
+
state_fields:
|
|
16
|
+
- topic
|
|
17
|
+
- ideation_file
|
|
18
|
+
- research_files
|
|
19
|
+
- brief_path
|
|
20
|
+
- brief_generated
|
|
21
|
+
---
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
# /agileflow:discovery:brief
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
Synthesize brainstorming results and research findings into a professional Product Brief artifact.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
---
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Purpose
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Generate a structured Product Brief that combines:
|
|
32
|
+
- Ideation report findings (feature ideas, confidence levels, expert perspectives)
|
|
33
|
+
- Research data (competitive analysis, market sizing, best practices)
|
|
34
|
+
- Your own knowledge synthesis
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
This can be used standalone (with existing ideation/research files) or as Phase 3 of the `/agileflow:discovery:new` workflow.
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
---
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## STEP 0: Gather Context
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
```bash
|
|
43
|
+
node .agileflow/scripts/obtain-context.js discovery:brief
|
|
44
|
+
```
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
---
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_START -->
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
## Compact Summary
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
**Command**: `/agileflow:discovery:brief` - Generate Product Brief from ideation + research
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
**Quick Usage**:
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
/agileflow:discovery:brief TOPIC="Mobile time tracking app"
|
|
57
|
+
/agileflow:discovery:brief TOPIC="AI code review" IDEATION=docs/08-project/ideation/ideation-20260213.md
|
|
58
|
+
/agileflow:discovery:brief TOPIC="Dashboard" RESEARCH=docs/10-research/20260213-dashboard-research.md
|
|
59
|
+
```
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
**What It Does**: Read ideation + research inputs -> Synthesize into Product Brief -> Save to docs/08-project/briefs/
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
**Key Sections Generated**:
|
|
64
|
+
- Executive Summary (problem + value prop)
|
|
65
|
+
- User Personas (from research/brainstorm)
|
|
66
|
+
- Features with MoSCoW prioritization
|
|
67
|
+
- Success Metrics
|
|
68
|
+
- Simple ROI / Business Case
|
|
69
|
+
- Competitive Context
|
|
70
|
+
- Risks and Edge Cases
|
|
71
|
+
- Next Steps
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
**Output**: `docs/08-project/briefs/{YYYYMMDD}-{topic-slug}-brief.md`
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_END -->
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
---
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
## Prompt
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
ROLE: Product Brief Synthesizer
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
You analyze ideation reports and research findings to produce a comprehensive Product Brief. You transform raw ideas and data into a structured, actionable document ready for epic/story planning.
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
### STEP 1: PARSE ARGUMENTS & LOCATE INPUTS
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
Parse the user's input:
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
| Argument | Required | Default | Description |
|
|
90
|
+
|----------|----------|---------|-------------|
|
|
91
|
+
| TOPIC | Yes | - | The product/feature being briefed |
|
|
92
|
+
| IDEATION | No | Auto-detect | Path to ideation report |
|
|
93
|
+
| RESEARCH | No | Auto-detect | Comma-separated paths to research files |
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
**If TOPIC is missing**, ask the user.
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
**Auto-detect inputs** if paths not provided:
|
|
98
|
+
1. Search `docs/08-project/ideation/` for recent ideation reports matching the topic
|
|
99
|
+
2. Search `docs/10-research/` for recent research files matching the topic
|
|
100
|
+
3. If no files found, that's OK - generate brief from topic + internal knowledge
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
**Read all located files** using the Read tool. Extract:
|
|
103
|
+
- From ideation: ideas, confidence levels, expert names, categories, effort estimates
|
|
104
|
+
- From research: competitive data, market info, user segments, best practices
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
---
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
### STEP 2: SYNTHESIZE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
Write a 2-3 sentence executive summary that captures:
|
|
111
|
+
1. The problem being solved
|
|
112
|
+
2. The proposed solution / value proposition
|
|
113
|
+
3. The key differentiator or opportunity
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
**Source**: Combine the highest-confidence ideas from ideation with market context from research.
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
---
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
### STEP 3: EXTRACT USER PERSONAS
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
Create 2-3 user personas:
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
**From research data** (if available):
|
|
124
|
+
- User segments identified in market analysis
|
|
125
|
+
- Pain points from competitive weaknesses
|
|
126
|
+
- Demographics or role-based segments
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
**From ideation data** (if available):
|
|
129
|
+
- "Target users" sections from expert brainstorms
|
|
130
|
+
- User needs implied by feature suggestions
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
**If neither available**: Infer reasonable personas from the topic domain.
|
|
133
|
+
|
|
134
|
+
For each persona, provide:
|
|
135
|
+
- Name (descriptive, e.g., "Solo Freelancer" not "User A")
|
|
136
|
+
- Role description
|
|
137
|
+
- Key pain points (2-3)
|
|
138
|
+
- Goals (2-3)
|
|
139
|
+
- Current workaround
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
---
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
### STEP 4: MAP FEATURES TO MoSCoW
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
Categorize all features/ideas using MoSCoW prioritization:
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
**MUST HAVE** - Features that are:
|
|
148
|
+
- Agreed by 2+ experts in ideation (HIGH confidence)
|
|
149
|
+
- Core to the value proposition
|
|
150
|
+
- Required for minimum viable product
|
|
151
|
+
- Validated by competitive analysis as table-stakes
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
**SHOULD HAVE** - Features that are:
|
|
154
|
+
- Suggested by 1 expert with strong rationale
|
|
155
|
+
- Important for user satisfaction but not critical for launch
|
|
156
|
+
- Mentioned in research as common expectations
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
**COULD HAVE** - Features that are:
|
|
159
|
+
- Nice-to-have differentiators
|
|
160
|
+
- Future enhancement opportunities
|
|
161
|
+
- Mentioned in brainstorming but lower priority
|
|
162
|
+
|
|
163
|
+
**WON'T HAVE** - Explicitly out of scope:
|
|
164
|
+
- Features that were discussed and rejected (with rationale)
|
|
165
|
+
- Scope boundaries to prevent creep
|
|
166
|
+
- Items deferred to v2+
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
For each feature, include:
|
|
169
|
+
- Feature name
|
|
170
|
+
- Brief rationale (why this priority?)
|
|
171
|
+
- Source (which expert or research file)
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
---
|
|
174
|
+
|
|
175
|
+
### STEP 5: DEFINE SUCCESS METRICS
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
Define 3-5 measurable success metrics:
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
**Draw from:**
|
|
180
|
+
- Problem statement (what does success look like?)
|
|
181
|
+
- User personas (what outcomes do they care about?)
|
|
182
|
+
- Competitive gaps (how do we measure differentiation?)
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
**Format each metric as:**
|
|
185
|
+
| Metric | Target | How to Measure |
|
|
186
|
+
|--------|--------|----------------|
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
Include both:
|
|
189
|
+
- **Leading indicators** (adoption rate, feature usage, engagement)
|
|
190
|
+
- **Lagging indicators** (retention, satisfaction, business impact)
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
---
|
|
193
|
+
|
|
194
|
+
### STEP 6: ESTIMATE BUSINESS CASE (Simple ROI)
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
Provide a simple, honest business case:
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
- **Effort Estimate**: Based on MUST HAVE + SHOULD HAVE feature count and complexity. Express as T-shirt size (S/M/L/XL) with approximate person-weeks.
|
|
199
|
+
- **Expected Benefit**: Based on persona pain points and market opportunity. Keep qualitative unless research provides specific data.
|
|
200
|
+
- **Payback Period**: Rough estimate (weeks/months/quarters).
|
|
201
|
+
- **Confidence Level**: Low/Medium/High based on available data.
|
|
202
|
+
|
|
203
|
+
**Do NOT over-model.** A sentence or two per item is sufficient. This is order-of-magnitude estimation, not financial analysis.
|
|
204
|
+
|
|
205
|
+
---
|
|
206
|
+
|
|
207
|
+
### STEP 7: SUMMARIZE COMPETITIVE CONTEXT
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
**If research data available:**
|
|
210
|
+
- Create comparison table of top alternatives
|
|
211
|
+
- Identify strengths, weaknesses, and our differentiator for each
|
|
212
|
+
- Write a positioning statement
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
**If no research data:**
|
|
215
|
+
- Note that competitive research was not conducted
|
|
216
|
+
- Suggest running `/agileflow:research:ask` for competitive analysis
|
|
217
|
+
- Provide any known alternatives from internal knowledge
|
|
218
|
+
|
|
219
|
+
---
|
|
220
|
+
|
|
221
|
+
### STEP 8: IDENTIFY RISKS AND EDGE CASES
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
List 3-5 risks with severity, likelihood, and mitigation:
|
|
224
|
+
|
|
225
|
+
**Sources:**
|
|
226
|
+
- Ideation report "risks" sections
|
|
227
|
+
- Competitive threats from research
|
|
228
|
+
- Technical complexity from architecture expert
|
|
229
|
+
- Market risks (timing, adoption barriers)
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
---
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
### STEP 9: ADD TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
234
|
+
|
|
235
|
+
Brief technical notes (if architecture/API expert input available):
|
|
236
|
+
- Recommended tech stack or approach
|
|
237
|
+
- Key architectural decisions to make
|
|
238
|
+
- Integration points or dependencies
|
|
239
|
+
- Performance or scaling considerations
|
|
240
|
+
|
|
241
|
+
Keep this section brief - detailed technical architecture belongs in ADRs, not the brief.
|
|
242
|
+
|
|
243
|
+
---
|
|
244
|
+
|
|
245
|
+
### STEP 10: WRITE AND SAVE THE BRIEF
|
|
246
|
+
|
|
247
|
+
**Compose the full Product Brief** following the template structure.
|
|
248
|
+
|
|
249
|
+
**Create directory if needed:**
|
|
250
|
+
```bash
|
|
251
|
+
mkdir -p docs/08-project/briefs
|
|
252
|
+
```
|
|
253
|
+
|
|
254
|
+
**Generate filename**: `docs/08-project/briefs/{YYYYMMDD}-{topic-slug}-brief.md`
|
|
255
|
+
|
|
256
|
+
**Fill in the frontmatter:**
|
|
257
|
+
- `brief_id`: `BRIEF-{YYYYMMDD}-{NNN}` (sequential)
|
|
258
|
+
- `topic`: The TOPIC argument
|
|
259
|
+
- `depth`: quick/guided/deep (or "standalone" if run directly)
|
|
260
|
+
- `created`: ISO date
|
|
261
|
+
- `status`: draft
|
|
262
|
+
- `ideation_source`: Path to ideation file (or "none")
|
|
263
|
+
- `research_sources`: Comma-separated paths (or "none")
|
|
264
|
+
|
|
265
|
+
**Write the file** using the Write tool.
|
|
266
|
+
|
|
267
|
+
**Tell the user:**
|
|
268
|
+
```
|
|
269
|
+
Product Brief generated!
|
|
270
|
+
Saved to: docs/08-project/briefs/{filename}
|
|
271
|
+
|
|
272
|
+
Summary:
|
|
273
|
+
- {N} MUST HAVE features
|
|
274
|
+
- {N} SHOULD HAVE features
|
|
275
|
+
- {N} COULD HAVE features
|
|
276
|
+
- {N} WON'T HAVE items
|
|
277
|
+
- {N} personas defined
|
|
278
|
+
- {N} success metrics
|
|
279
|
+
- {N} risks identified
|
|
280
|
+
```
|
|
281
|
+
|
|
282
|
+
---
|
|
283
|
+
|
|
284
|
+
### STEP 11: OFFER NEXT STEPS
|
|
285
|
+
|
|
286
|
+
```xml
|
|
287
|
+
<invoke name="AskUserQuestion">
|
|
288
|
+
<parameter name="questions">[{"question": "Product Brief for '{TOPIC}' is ready. What would you like to do?", "header": "Next Steps", "multiSelect": false, "options": [{"label": "Create epic from this brief (Recommended)", "description": "Run /agileflow:epic to decompose MUST/SHOULD HAVE features into stories"}, {"label": "Refine the brief", "description": "Edit specific sections, adjust priorities, or add detail"}, {"label": "Run competitive research", "description": "Generate research prompt for deeper competitive/market analysis"}, {"label": "Done for now", "description": "Brief saved, review and return later"}]}]</parameter>
|
|
289
|
+
</invoke>
|
|
290
|
+
```
|
|
291
|
+
|
|
292
|
+
---
|
|
293
|
+
|
|
294
|
+
## Arguments
|
|
295
|
+
|
|
296
|
+
| Argument | Values | Default | Description |
|
|
297
|
+
|----------|--------|---------|-------------|
|
|
298
|
+
| TOPIC | Free text | (required) | The product/feature being briefed |
|
|
299
|
+
| IDEATION | File path | Auto-detect | Path to ideation report in docs/08-project/ideation/ |
|
|
300
|
+
| RESEARCH | File paths | Auto-detect | Comma-separated paths to research files in docs/10-research/ |
|
|
301
|
+
|
|
302
|
+
{{argument}}
|
|
303
|
+
|
|
304
|
+
---
|
|
305
|
+
|
|
306
|
+
## Examples
|
|
307
|
+
|
|
308
|
+
### Standalone (no prior ideation)
|
|
309
|
+
```
|
|
310
|
+
/agileflow:discovery:brief TOPIC="Real-time collaboration for docs"
|
|
311
|
+
```
|
|
312
|
+
Generates a brief from internal knowledge + topic analysis.
|
|
313
|
+
|
|
314
|
+
### With existing ideation
|
|
315
|
+
```
|
|
316
|
+
/agileflow:discovery:brief TOPIC="API rate limiter" IDEATION=docs/08-project/ideation/ideation-20260213-api-rate-limiter.md
|
|
317
|
+
```
|
|
318
|
+
Reads the ideation report and synthesizes into a brief.
|
|
319
|
+
|
|
320
|
+
### With ideation + research
|
|
321
|
+
```
|
|
322
|
+
/agileflow:discovery:brief TOPIC="Mobile app" IDEATION=docs/08-project/ideation/ideation-20260213-mobile-app.md RESEARCH=docs/10-research/20260213-mobile-market-research.md,docs/10-research/20260213-mobile-competitors.md
|
|
323
|
+
```
|
|
324
|
+
Full synthesis from both sources.
|
|
325
|
+
|
|
326
|
+
---
|
|
327
|
+
|
|
328
|
+
## Expected Output
|
|
329
|
+
|
|
330
|
+
### Success
|
|
331
|
+
|
|
332
|
+
```
|
|
333
|
+
Product Brief: "Real-time Collaboration for Docs"
|
|
334
|
+
================================================
|
|
335
|
+
|
|
336
|
+
Reading inputs...
|
|
337
|
+
Ideation report: docs/08-project/ideation/ideation-20260213-realtime-collab.md (15 ideas)
|
|
338
|
+
Research: docs/10-research/20260213-realtime-collab-research.md
|
|
339
|
+
|
|
340
|
+
Synthesizing...
|
|
341
|
+
Executive Summary... done
|
|
342
|
+
User Personas (3 defined)... done
|
|
343
|
+
Features: 4 MUST, 3 SHOULD, 5 COULD, 2 WON'T... done
|
|
344
|
+
Success Metrics (4 defined)... done
|
|
345
|
+
Business Case... done
|
|
346
|
+
Competitive Context (3 alternatives)... done
|
|
347
|
+
Risks (4 identified)... done
|
|
348
|
+
|
|
349
|
+
Saved to: docs/08-project/briefs/20260213-realtime-collaboration-for-docs-brief.md
|
|
350
|
+
|
|
351
|
+
What would you like to do next?
|
|
352
|
+
```
|
|
353
|
+
|
|
354
|
+
---
|
|
355
|
+
|
|
356
|
+
## Related Commands
|
|
357
|
+
|
|
358
|
+
- `/agileflow:discovery:new` - Full discovery workflow (brainstorm + research + brief)
|
|
359
|
+
- `/agileflow:ideate:new` - Generate ideation report
|
|
360
|
+
- `/agileflow:research:ask` - Generate research prompts
|
|
361
|
+
- `/agileflow:research:synthesize` - Synthesize multiple research files
|
|
362
|
+
- `/agileflow:epic` - Create epic from brief
|
|
363
|
+
- `/agileflow:council` - Get architectural advice
|