agents-templated 2.2.18 → 2.2.19
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/templates/agents/commands/README.md +0 -144
- package/templates/agents/commands/SCHEMA.md +0 -42
- package/templates/agents/commands/arch-check.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/audit.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/debug-track.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/docs.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/fix.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/learn-loop.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/perf.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/plan.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/pr.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/problem-map.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/release-ready.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/release.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/risk-review.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/scope-shape.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/task.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/test-data.md +0 -56
- package/templates/agents/commands/test.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/commands/ux-bar.md +0 -58
- package/templates/agents/rules/ai-integration.md +0 -54
- package/templates/agents/rules/core.md +0 -173
- package/templates/agents/rules/database.md +0 -305
- package/templates/agents/rules/frontend.md +0 -217
- package/templates/agents/rules/guardrails.md +0 -97
- package/templates/agents/rules/hardening.md +0 -52
- package/templates/agents/rules/intent-routing.md +0 -54
- package/templates/agents/rules/lessons-learned.md +0 -44
- package/templates/agents/rules/planning.md +0 -69
- package/templates/agents/rules/security.md +0 -278
- package/templates/agents/rules/style.md +0 -344
- package/templates/agents/rules/system-workflow.md +0 -63
- package/templates/agents/rules/testing.md +0 -371
- package/templates/agents/rules/workflows.md +0 -56
- package/templates/agents/skills/README.md +0 -198
- package/templates/agents/skills/api-design/SKILL.md +0 -59
- package/templates/agents/skills/app-hardening/SKILL.md +0 -45
- package/templates/agents/skills/bug-triage/SKILL.md +0 -36
- package/templates/agents/skills/debug-skill/SKILL.md +0 -39
- package/templates/agents/skills/emilkowalski-skill/SKILL.md +0 -51
- package/templates/agents/skills/error-patterns/SKILL.md +0 -70
- package/templates/agents/skills/feature-delivery/SKILL.md +0 -38
- package/templates/agents/skills/feature-forge/SKILL.md +0 -39
- package/templates/agents/skills/find-skills/SKILL.md +0 -133
- package/templates/agents/skills/llm-integration/SKILL.md +0 -64
- package/templates/agents/skills/raphaelsalaja-userinterface-wiki/SKILL.md +0 -51
- package/templates/agents/skills/secure-code-guardian/SKILL.md +0 -39
- package/templates/agents/skills/shadcn-ui/SKILL.md +0 -1932
- package/templates/agents/skills/shadcn-ui/references/chart.md +0 -306
- package/templates/agents/skills/shadcn-ui/references/learn.md +0 -145
- package/templates/agents/skills/shadcn-ui/references/official-ui-reference.md +0 -1729
- package/templates/agents/skills/shadcn-ui/references/reference.md +0 -586
- package/templates/agents/skills/shadcn-ui/references/ui-reference.md +0 -1578
- package/templates/agents/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/SKILL.md +0 -386
|
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /pr
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## A. Intent
|
|
4
|
-
Prepare a deterministic pull request package with implementation and validation evidence.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
## B. When to Use
|
|
7
|
-
- Use after code changes and validation are complete and review package is needed.
|
|
8
|
-
- Do not use when critical findings are still unresolved.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## C. Context Assumptions
|
|
11
|
-
- Change set exists.
|
|
12
|
-
- Validation evidence is available.
|
|
13
|
-
- Linked issue/task context is known.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## D. Required Inputs
|
|
16
|
-
| Input | Type | Example |
|
|
17
|
-
|---------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `change_summary` | string | "add retry policy to webhook worker" |
|
|
19
|
-
| `linked_items` | string[] | ["ISSUE-18", "TASK-42"] |
|
|
20
|
-
| `validation_evidence` | artifact | test report, benchmark output, screenshot |
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## E. Pre-Execution Guards <- fail fast, check ALL before running
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] change summary is complete
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] linked items are resolvable
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] validation evidence is present
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## F. Execution Flow
|
|
28
|
-
1. Collect changed files and linked references.
|
|
29
|
-
2. Summarize intent, impact, and scope.
|
|
30
|
-
3. Attach validation and risk evidence.
|
|
31
|
-
4. Decision point ->
|
|
32
|
-
- condition A -> critical blocker open -> abort PR package
|
|
33
|
-
- condition B -> no blocker -> continue.
|
|
34
|
-
5. Build reviewer checklist and rollout notes.
|
|
35
|
-
6. Emit PR payload.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## G. Output Schema
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
```json
|
|
40
|
-
{
|
|
41
|
-
"title": "string",
|
|
42
|
-
"files_changed": ["array","of","strings"],
|
|
43
|
-
"risk_assessment": "low | medium | high",
|
|
44
|
-
"blockers": "string | null"
|
|
45
|
-
}
|
|
46
|
-
```
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## H. Output Target
|
|
49
|
-
- Default delivery: stdout
|
|
50
|
-
- Override flag: --output=<target>
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
## I. Stop Conditions <- abort with error message, never emit partial output
|
|
53
|
-
- validation evidence missing for critical changes
|
|
54
|
-
- open critical findings remain unresolved
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## J. Safety Constraints
|
|
57
|
-
- Hard block: hard block if critical issues remain
|
|
58
|
-
- Warn only: warn when non-critical follow-up items are deferred
|
|
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /problem-map
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## A. Intent
|
|
4
|
-
Frame the real user problem and guarantee a clear problem statement before planning.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
## B. When to Use
|
|
7
|
-
- Use at the start of a feature cycle when pain points are unclear or broad.
|
|
8
|
-
- Do not use for implementation details or code-level debugging.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## C. Context Assumptions
|
|
11
|
-
- User objective is available.
|
|
12
|
-
- Stakeholder context can be collected.
|
|
13
|
-
- Outcome can be stated as a measurable problem.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## D. Required Inputs
|
|
16
|
-
| Input | Type | Example |
|
|
17
|
-
|---------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `user_problem` | string | "onboarding drop-off at step 2" |
|
|
19
|
-
| `signals` | string[] | ["support tickets", "analytics"] |
|
|
20
|
-
| `evidence_artifact` | artifact | funnel screenshot, issue links |
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## E. Pre-Execution Guards <- fail fast, check ALL before running
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] problem statement is concrete
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] signals support the stated pain
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] scope remains problem-focused
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## F. Execution Flow
|
|
28
|
-
1. Collect user pain signals and context.
|
|
29
|
-
2. Synthesize candidate problem statements.
|
|
30
|
-
3. Validate statement against evidence.
|
|
31
|
-
4. Decision point ->
|
|
32
|
-
- condition A -> weak evidence -> request stronger signals
|
|
33
|
-
- condition B -> strong evidence -> continue.
|
|
34
|
-
5. Produce framed problem and success criteria.
|
|
35
|
-
6. Emit problem map package.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## G. Output Schema
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
```json
|
|
40
|
-
{
|
|
41
|
-
"problem_id": "string",
|
|
42
|
-
"core_pains": ["array","of","strings"],
|
|
43
|
-
"urgency": "low | medium | high",
|
|
44
|
-
"unknowns": "string | null"
|
|
45
|
-
}
|
|
46
|
-
```
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## H. Output Target
|
|
49
|
-
- Default delivery: stdout
|
|
50
|
-
- Override flag: --output=<target>
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
## I. Stop Conditions <- abort with error message, never emit partial output
|
|
53
|
-
- problem statement remains vague
|
|
54
|
-
- evidence contradicts proposed framing
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## J. Safety Constraints
|
|
57
|
-
- Hard block: hard block on fabricated assumptions presented as facts
|
|
58
|
-
- Warn only: warn when evidence quality is limited
|
|
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /release-ready
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## A. Intent
|
|
4
|
-
Validate pre-release readiness gates and guarantee deploy prerequisites are satisfied.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
## B. When to Use
|
|
7
|
-
- Use after implementation/tests/risk review and before final release decision.
|
|
8
|
-
- Do not use to execute deployment itself.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## C. Context Assumptions
|
|
11
|
-
- Release candidate exists.
|
|
12
|
-
- All required gate outputs are available.
|
|
13
|
-
- Rollout and rollback plans are drafted.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## D. Required Inputs
|
|
16
|
-
| Input | Type | Example |
|
|
17
|
-
|---------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `candidate_version` | string | "v2.4.0-rc1" |
|
|
19
|
-
| `gate_artifacts` | string[] | ["test", "risk-review", "perf-scan"] |
|
|
20
|
-
| `release_artifact` | artifact | release checklist, migration plan |
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## E. Pre-Execution Guards <- fail fast, check ALL before running
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] mandatory gates are present
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] critical blockers are resolved
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] rollback steps are executable
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## F. Execution Flow
|
|
28
|
-
1. Collect gate evidence for candidate.
|
|
29
|
-
2. Validate checklist completion.
|
|
30
|
-
3. Verify rollout and rollback readiness.
|
|
31
|
-
4. Decision point ->
|
|
32
|
-
- condition A -> missing mandatory gate -> block readiness
|
|
33
|
-
- condition B -> all gates complete -> continue.
|
|
34
|
-
5. Assemble readiness summary and open items.
|
|
35
|
-
6. Emit release-ready report.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## G. Output Schema
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
```json
|
|
40
|
-
{
|
|
41
|
-
"readiness_id": "string",
|
|
42
|
-
"gate_status": ["array","of","strings"],
|
|
43
|
-
"readiness_risk": "low | medium | high",
|
|
44
|
-
"blocker": "string | null"
|
|
45
|
-
}
|
|
46
|
-
```
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## H. Output Target
|
|
49
|
-
- Default delivery: stdout
|
|
50
|
-
- Override flag: --output=<target>
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
## I. Stop Conditions <- abort with error message, never emit partial output
|
|
53
|
-
- mandatory gate missing or failed
|
|
54
|
-
- rollback execution path is unverified
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## J. Safety Constraints
|
|
57
|
-
- Hard block: hard block when release checklist is incomplete on critical items
|
|
58
|
-
- Warn only: warn when non-critical items are deferred
|
|
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /release
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## A. Intent
|
|
4
|
-
Generate deterministic release decision package with rollout and rollback readiness.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
## B. When to Use
|
|
7
|
-
- Use when deciding whether to ship to production.
|
|
8
|
-
- Do not use before release-ready checks are complete.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## C. Context Assumptions
|
|
11
|
-
- Release candidate is identified.
|
|
12
|
-
- Pre-release checks are completed.
|
|
13
|
-
- Rollback strategy is defined.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## D. Required Inputs
|
|
16
|
-
| Input | Type | Example |
|
|
17
|
-
|---------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `version` | string | "v2.4.0" |
|
|
19
|
-
| `gate_results` | string[] | ["tests-pass", "risk-review-pass"] |
|
|
20
|
-
| `release_artifacts` | artifact | release notes draft, migration plan |
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## E. Pre-Execution Guards <- fail fast, check ALL before running
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] version is valid and unique
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] required gates are complete
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] rollback plan exists
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## F. Execution Flow
|
|
28
|
-
1. Collect gate outputs and release artifacts.
|
|
29
|
-
2. Validate rollout and rollback prerequisites.
|
|
30
|
-
3. Classify release risk.
|
|
31
|
-
4. Decision point ->
|
|
32
|
-
- condition A -> high unresolved risk -> block release
|
|
33
|
-
- condition B -> acceptable risk -> continue.
|
|
34
|
-
5. Build release decision and communication payload.
|
|
35
|
-
6. Emit release package.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## G. Output Schema
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
```json
|
|
40
|
-
{
|
|
41
|
-
"release_id": "string",
|
|
42
|
-
"gates": ["array","of","strings"],
|
|
43
|
-
"release_risk": "low | medium | high",
|
|
44
|
-
"rollback_status": "string | null"
|
|
45
|
-
}
|
|
46
|
-
```
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## H. Output Target
|
|
49
|
-
- Default delivery: stdout
|
|
50
|
-
- Override flag: --output=<target>
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
## I. Stop Conditions <- abort with error message, never emit partial output
|
|
53
|
-
- required gate missing or failed
|
|
54
|
-
- rollback plan is undefined
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## J. Safety Constraints
|
|
57
|
-
- Hard block: hard block on unresolved high-severity release risks
|
|
58
|
-
- Warn only: warn when rollout is phased due to uncertainty
|
|
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /risk-review
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## A. Intent
|
|
4
|
-
Perform deterministic release risk review with mitigation and rollback readiness.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
## B. When to Use
|
|
7
|
-
- Use before merge or release approval on non-trivial changes.
|
|
8
|
-
- Do not use as a substitute for running tests.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## C. Context Assumptions
|
|
11
|
-
- Change set is available.
|
|
12
|
-
- Validation evidence exists.
|
|
13
|
-
- Deployment context is known.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## D. Required Inputs
|
|
16
|
-
| Input | Type | Example |
|
|
17
|
-
|---------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `change_set` | string | "payment retry + queue changes" |
|
|
19
|
-
| `validation_status` | string[] | ["unit pass", "integration pass"] |
|
|
20
|
-
| `deployment_artifact` | artifact | rollout plan, env config snapshot |
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## E. Pre-Execution Guards <- fail fast, check ALL before running
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] change set is fully described
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] validation status is current
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] rollback path is defined
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## F. Execution Flow
|
|
28
|
-
1. Inspect behavior deltas and blast radius.
|
|
29
|
-
2. Rank risks by impact and likelihood.
|
|
30
|
-
3. Validate mitigations and rollback readiness.
|
|
31
|
-
4. Decision point ->
|
|
32
|
-
- condition A -> high unresolved risk -> block recommendation
|
|
33
|
-
- condition B -> acceptable risk -> continue.
|
|
34
|
-
5. Build release risk summary and actions.
|
|
35
|
-
6. Emit risk review report.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## G. Output Schema
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
```json
|
|
40
|
-
{
|
|
41
|
-
"review_id": "string",
|
|
42
|
-
"risks": ["array","of","strings"],
|
|
43
|
-
"risk_level": "low | medium | high",
|
|
44
|
-
"recommendation": "string | null"
|
|
45
|
-
}
|
|
46
|
-
```
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## H. Output Target
|
|
49
|
-
- Default delivery: stdout
|
|
50
|
-
- Override flag: --output=<target>
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
## I. Stop Conditions <- abort with error message, never emit partial output
|
|
53
|
-
- high-severity risk has no mitigation
|
|
54
|
-
- rollback readiness is undefined
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## J. Safety Constraints
|
|
57
|
-
- Hard block: hard block on unresolved high-severity risks
|
|
58
|
-
- Warn only: warn when medium risks are accepted with owner
|
|
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /scope-shape
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## A. Intent
|
|
4
|
-
Constrain delivery scope to the smallest high-value reversible release.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
## B. When to Use
|
|
7
|
-
- Use after problem framing and before architectural design.
|
|
8
|
-
- Do not use when requirements are already contractually frozen.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## C. Context Assumptions
|
|
11
|
-
- Problem map exists.
|
|
12
|
-
- Candidate feature list exists.
|
|
13
|
-
- Delivery constraints are known.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## D. Required Inputs
|
|
16
|
-
| Input | Type | Example |
|
|
17
|
-
|---------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `scope_goal` | string | "ship MVP in 2 weeks" |
|
|
19
|
-
| `candidate_items` | string[] | ["email login", "social login", "tutorial"] |
|
|
20
|
-
| `constraint_artifact` | artifact | timeline doc, staffing snapshot |
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## E. Pre-Execution Guards <- fail fast, check ALL before running
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] scope goal is explicit
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] candidate items are ranked
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] out-of-scope list can be produced
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## F. Execution Flow
|
|
28
|
-
1. Rank candidate items by value and effort.
|
|
29
|
-
2. Draft in-scope and out-of-scope sets.
|
|
30
|
-
3. Check scope against constraints.
|
|
31
|
-
4. Decision point ->
|
|
32
|
-
- condition A -> scope exceeds constraints -> trim to MVP
|
|
33
|
-
- condition B -> feasible scope -> continue.
|
|
34
|
-
5. Build scope rationale and tradeoffs.
|
|
35
|
-
6. Emit scope decision package.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## G. Output Schema
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
```json
|
|
40
|
-
{
|
|
41
|
-
"scope_id": "string",
|
|
42
|
-
"scope_in": ["array","of","strings"],
|
|
43
|
-
"confidence": "low | medium | high",
|
|
44
|
-
"scope_out": "string | null"
|
|
45
|
-
}
|
|
46
|
-
```
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## H. Output Target
|
|
49
|
-
- Default delivery: stdout
|
|
50
|
-
- Override flag: --output=<target>
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
## I. Stop Conditions <- abort with error message, never emit partial output
|
|
53
|
-
- scope cannot satisfy constraints
|
|
54
|
-
- no explicit out-of-scope definition is produced
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## J. Safety Constraints
|
|
57
|
-
- Hard block: hard block on hidden scope creep
|
|
58
|
-
- Warn only: warn when deferred items carry significant risk
|
|
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /task
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## A. Intent
|
|
4
|
-
Convert approved plans into deterministic, execution-ready task batches.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
## B. When to Use
|
|
7
|
-
- Use when a plan exists and work must be distributed to implementers.
|
|
8
|
-
- Do not use before planning is complete.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## C. Context Assumptions
|
|
11
|
-
- An approved plan exists.
|
|
12
|
-
- Owners and execution context are known.
|
|
13
|
-
- Dependencies can be sequenced.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## D. Required Inputs
|
|
16
|
-
| Input | Type | Example |
|
|
17
|
-
|---------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `plan_id` | string | "plan-2026-04-03" |
|
|
19
|
-
| `task_scope` | string[] | ["api", "ui", "tests"] |
|
|
20
|
-
| `source_artifacts` | artifact | plan file path or issue board URL |
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## E. Pre-Execution Guards <- fail fast, check ALL before running
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] plan exists and is approved
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] task scope maps to explicit plan items
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] dependency order is resolvable
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## F. Execution Flow
|
|
28
|
-
1. Read plan outputs and dependency graph.
|
|
29
|
-
2. Split work into atomic tasks.
|
|
30
|
-
3. Assign execution order and ownership metadata.
|
|
31
|
-
4. Decision point ->
|
|
32
|
-
- condition A -> blocking dependency found -> move item to blocked queue
|
|
33
|
-
- condition B -> no blockers -> keep in active queue.
|
|
34
|
-
5. Build task package with acceptance checks.
|
|
35
|
-
6. Emit task list and execution order.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## G. Output Schema
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
```json
|
|
40
|
-
{
|
|
41
|
-
"task_batch_id": "string",
|
|
42
|
-
"tasks": ["array","of","strings"],
|
|
43
|
-
"priority": "low | medium | high",
|
|
44
|
-
"blocker": "string | null"
|
|
45
|
-
}
|
|
46
|
-
```
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## H. Output Target
|
|
49
|
-
- Default delivery: stdout
|
|
50
|
-
- Override flag: --output=<target>
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
## I. Stop Conditions <- abort with error message, never emit partial output
|
|
53
|
-
- plan_id is missing or invalid
|
|
54
|
-
- critical dependency cannot be resolved
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## J. Safety Constraints
|
|
57
|
-
- Hard block: no task emission without traceability to a plan item
|
|
58
|
-
- Warn only: warn when owner assignment is temporary
|
|
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /test-data
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## A. Intent
|
|
4
|
-
Produce deterministic fixtures, seeds, and mocks for downstream validation, e2e, and load phases.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
## B. When to Use
|
|
7
|
-
- Use when QA design or backend/database changes require repeatable datasets.
|
|
8
|
-
- Use before `qa-specialist(mode=validation)`, `e2e-runner`, or `performance-specialist(mode=load)`.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## C. Context Assumptions
|
|
11
|
-
- Acceptance criteria and target test flows are defined.
|
|
12
|
-
- Data shape constraints are known.
|
|
13
|
-
- Generated data can be reset safely.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## D. Required Inputs
|
|
16
|
-
| Input | Type | Example |
|
|
17
|
-
|---------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `consumer_targets` | string[] | ["qa-validation", "e2e", "perf-load"] |
|
|
19
|
-
| `dataset_scope` | string | "orders with edge-case payment states" |
|
|
20
|
-
| `data_constraints` | string[] | ["no PII", "stable IDs", "seed-controlled randomness"] |
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## E. Pre-Execution Guards <- fail fast, check ALL before running
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] dataset scope is explicit and bounded
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] production secrets and real PII are excluded
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] setup/reset path is defined and reversible
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## F. Execution Flow
|
|
28
|
-
1. Confirm required consumer targets and edge cases.
|
|
29
|
-
2. Build deterministic fixtures/seeds/mocks.
|
|
30
|
-
3. Package setup/reset instructions.
|
|
31
|
-
4. Validate data reproducibility and cleanup safety.
|
|
32
|
-
5. Emit test-data handoff report.
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
## G. Output Schema
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
```json
|
|
37
|
-
{
|
|
38
|
-
"data_package_id": "string",
|
|
39
|
-
"assets": ["array", "of", "strings"],
|
|
40
|
-
"setup_steps": ["array", "of", "strings"],
|
|
41
|
-
"reset_steps": ["array", "of", "strings"],
|
|
42
|
-
"handoff_targets": ["array", "of", "strings"]
|
|
43
|
-
}
|
|
44
|
-
```
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
## H. Output Target
|
|
47
|
-
- Default delivery: stdout
|
|
48
|
-
- Override flag: --output=<target>
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
## I. Stop Conditions <- abort with error message, never emit partial output
|
|
51
|
-
- dataset constraints are ambiguous or contradictory
|
|
52
|
-
- setup/reset cannot be executed safely
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
## J. Safety Constraints
|
|
55
|
-
- Hard block: never use production credentials or real PII
|
|
56
|
-
- Warn only: warn when synthetic distributions are approximate
|
|
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /test
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## A. Intent
|
|
4
|
-
Run deterministic validation and gate release readiness based on test evidence.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
## B. When to Use
|
|
7
|
-
- Use when validating behavior after implementation or before merge/release.
|
|
8
|
-
- This command now includes quality-gate behavior; do not use /quality-gate.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## C. Context Assumptions
|
|
11
|
-
- Test targets are defined.
|
|
12
|
-
- Required environments are available.
|
|
13
|
-
- Pass/fail criteria are explicit.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## D. Required Inputs
|
|
16
|
-
| Input | Type | Example |
|
|
17
|
-
|---------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `test_scope` | string | "api regression" |
|
|
19
|
-
| `test_suites` | string[] | ["unit", "integration", "critical-flow"] |
|
|
20
|
-
| `evidence_artifact` | artifact | test report path or CI run URL |
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## E. Pre-Execution Guards <- fail fast, check ALL before running
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] test scope is non-empty
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] critical test suites are executable
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] pass criteria are declared
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## F. Execution Flow
|
|
28
|
-
1. Collect test targets and runtime config.
|
|
29
|
-
2. Execute suites in deterministic order.
|
|
30
|
-
3. Aggregate results and failures.
|
|
31
|
-
4. Decision point ->
|
|
32
|
-
- condition A -> critical failures present -> gate = blocked
|
|
33
|
-
- condition B -> no critical failures -> gate = pass.
|
|
34
|
-
5. Build validation evidence and remediation list.
|
|
35
|
-
6. Emit test and gate report.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## G. Output Schema
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
```json
|
|
40
|
-
{
|
|
41
|
-
"test_run_id": "string",
|
|
42
|
-
"results": ["array","of","strings"],
|
|
43
|
-
"gate_status": "low | medium | high",
|
|
44
|
-
"blocker": "string | null"
|
|
45
|
-
}
|
|
46
|
-
```
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## H. Output Target
|
|
49
|
-
- Default delivery: stdout
|
|
50
|
-
- Override flag: --output=<target>
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
## I. Stop Conditions <- abort with error message, never emit partial output
|
|
53
|
-
- critical test suite cannot run
|
|
54
|
-
- result schema cannot be produced
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## J. Safety Constraints
|
|
57
|
-
- Hard block: hard block when critical flow tests fail
|
|
58
|
-
- Warn only: warn when flaky tests are excluded with justification
|
|
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /ux-bar
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## A. Intent
|
|
4
|
-
Assess UX quality bar and guarantee core interaction states are defined before build.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
## B. When to Use
|
|
7
|
-
- Use when UX quality and accessibility need pre-implementation validation.
|
|
8
|
-
- Do not use as a replacement for visual design exploration.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## C. Context Assumptions
|
|
11
|
-
- Scope and architecture are available.
|
|
12
|
-
- Primary user flows are identified.
|
|
13
|
-
- Design references exist.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## D. Required Inputs
|
|
16
|
-
| Input | Type | Example |
|
|
17
|
-
|---------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `ux_goal` | string | "reduce checkout friction" |
|
|
19
|
-
| `flows` | string[] | ["cart", "payment", "confirmation"] |
|
|
20
|
-
| `design_artifact` | artifact | wireframes, Figma link, screenshots |
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## E. Pre-Execution Guards <- fail fast, check ALL before running
|
|
23
|
-
- [ ] critical flows are enumerated
|
|
24
|
-
- [ ] interaction states include loading/error/empty
|
|
25
|
-
- [ ] accessibility checks are defined
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## F. Execution Flow
|
|
28
|
-
1. Review flows and interaction states.
|
|
29
|
-
2. Evaluate accessibility and usability risks.
|
|
30
|
-
3. Score UX gaps by severity.
|
|
31
|
-
4. Decision point ->
|
|
32
|
-
- condition A -> critical UX gap -> block readiness
|
|
33
|
-
- condition B -> manageable gaps -> continue.
|
|
34
|
-
5. Build prioritized improvement list.
|
|
35
|
-
6. Emit UX quality package.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## G. Output Schema
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
```json
|
|
40
|
-
{
|
|
41
|
-
"ux_review_id": "string",
|
|
42
|
-
"ux_gaps": ["array","of","strings"],
|
|
43
|
-
"severity": "low | medium | high",
|
|
44
|
-
"blocker": "string | null"
|
|
45
|
-
}
|
|
46
|
-
```
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## H. Output Target
|
|
49
|
-
- Default delivery: stdout
|
|
50
|
-
- Override flag: --output=<target>
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
## I. Stop Conditions <- abort with error message, never emit partial output
|
|
53
|
-
- critical flow lacks defined interaction states
|
|
54
|
-
- accessibility baseline is not addressed
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## J. Safety Constraints
|
|
57
|
-
- Hard block: hard block on unaddressed critical accessibility failures
|
|
58
|
-
- Warn only: warn when medium UX issues are deferred
|
|
@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
title: "AI / LLM Integration"
|
|
3
|
-
description: "Apply when integrating LLMs, RAG pipelines, prompt engineering, or building AI-powered features. Covers safety, cost, and quality"
|
|
4
|
-
version: "3.0.0"
|
|
5
|
-
tags: ["ai", "llm", "openai", "anthropic", "rag", "prompt-engineering", "safety"]
|
|
6
|
-
alwaysApply: false
|
|
7
|
-
globs: ["**/*llm*", "**/*openai*", "**/*anthropic*", "**/*langchain*", "**/*rag*", "**/ai/**"]
|
|
8
|
-
---
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## Purpose
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
Govern LLM integrations safely: prevent prompt injection, enforce cost boundaries, define fallback behavior, and ensure model outputs are validated before use in any user-facing or downstream context.
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
## Security Requirements
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
1. **Prompt injection prevention** — Never interpolate raw user input directly into system prompts. Delimit user content explicitly (e.g., `<user_input>…</user_input>` tags or equivalent structural separation).
|
|
17
|
-
2. **Output validation** — Treat all LLM outputs as untrusted data. Validate schema, sanitize before rendering in UI, and never execute LLM-generated code without a human or automated review gate.
|
|
18
|
-
3. **Secret isolation** — API keys must live in environment variables only. Never log full request/response payloads that may contain sensitive user data.
|
|
19
|
-
4. **Rate limiting** — Apply per-user and global rate limits on all LLM-backed endpoints to prevent abuse and runaway costs.
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
## Cost Controls
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
- Set explicit `max_tokens` on every API call — never rely on model defaults.
|
|
24
|
-
- Log token usage per request; alert on anomalies (> 2× rolling baseline).
|
|
25
|
-
- Prefer streaming for long generations to enable early cancellation.
|
|
26
|
-
- Use smaller/cheaper models for classification, routing, or validation tasks; reserve large models for generation.
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
## Model Selection
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
| Task | Preferred approach |
|
|
31
|
-
|------|--------------------|
|
|
32
|
-
| Classification / intent detection | Small fast model or fine-tuned classifier |
|
|
33
|
-
| Retrieval-augmented generation | Embed → retrieve → generate pipeline |
|
|
34
|
-
| Code generation | Model with strong code benchmarks; always review output |
|
|
35
|
-
| Summarization | Mid-tier model with explicit length constraints |
|
|
36
|
-
| Production generation | Model with provider SLA; never experimental endpoints in prod |
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
## Fallback & Reliability
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
- Every LLM call must have a timeout and retry with exponential backoff (max 3 retries).
|
|
41
|
-
- Define a graceful degradation path for every LLM-powered feature (static response, cached answer, or user-facing degradation message).
|
|
42
|
-
- Do not block critical user flows on LLM availability.
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
## RAG Pipeline Rules
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
- Chunk documents at semantic boundaries (paragraph, section), not arbitrary byte offsets.
|
|
47
|
-
- Score retrieved chunks; discard chunks below relevance threshold before injecting into prompt.
|
|
48
|
-
- Cite sources in output when content is retrieved — never present retrieved facts as model-generated knowledge.
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
## Evaluation Requirements
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
- New LLM features must include an evaluation suite before production: minimum 20 representative examples with expected outputs.
|
|
53
|
-
- Track: accuracy, latency (p50/p95), token cost per request, failure rate.
|
|
54
|
-
- Accuracy regressions > 5% block promotion to production.
|