agentlas 1.0.1 → 1.0.3

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,61 @@
1
1
  # Changelog
2
2
 
3
+ ## 1.0.3 — 2026-07-27
4
+
5
+ Live `workforce` runs surfaced four defects that no unit gate could reach.
6
+
7
+ - **A slash after Korean/Japanese/Chinese text no longer reads as a file
8
+ path.** The hub-boundary guard's absolute-path lookbehind excluded only
9
+ ASCII, so ordinary phrases ("진단/멱등키", "한국어/영어") were rejected as
10
+ private paths — and the phrase being the task itself meant no repair was
11
+ possible. Shared fixtures now pin this in both this engine and the server
12
+ (`scripts/sync-privacy-guard.sh`).
13
+ - **Bundle preparation is no longer killed by the connect timeout.** The
14
+ 15s "connect" budget actually measured time-to-response-headers, and the
15
+ server computes a multi-slot roster before its first byte, so preparation
16
+ died as a transport error. Workforce calls now use their own budget.
17
+ - **Selection cycle rules match the Hub exactly.** Local validation only
18
+ checked handsOffTo/reportsTo, so a `reviews` cycle passed locally and came
19
+ back as a Hub rejection. All relations and self-edges now count.
20
+ - **A worker that exits non-zero reports its stdout tail too**, so a failure
21
+ whose stderr holds only unrelated warnings is no longer a dead end.
22
+
23
+ Also in this release:
24
+
25
+ - **Live narration**: a `workforce` run now prints the slot count and hub
26
+ menu size, the picked agent per slot by name, hub acceptance, each worker
27
+ as it starts, and the synthesis→verification transition.
28
+ - **One name per feature across platforms**: `hep-network`, `hep-cloud`,
29
+ `hep-build`, `hep-call`, `hep-search`, `hep-upload`, `hep-storm`,
30
+ `hep-browser`, `hep-connect` now work as terminal commands, matching the
31
+ skill names used from Claude Code and Codex. The typo guard suggests them.
32
+
33
+ ## 1.0.2 — 2026-07-27
34
+
35
+ Workforce execution-contract fixes. Every worker in a `workforce` run now
36
+ knows its exact execution authority, and the run recovers honestly instead
37
+ of shipping broken output:
38
+
39
+ - Tool-less (no-authority) workers are told explicitly that zero tools are
40
+ granted and that the deliverable must be authored directly in the reply.
41
+ Previously a borrowed worker was silently stripped of tools, tried to
42
+ call them anyway, leaked raw tool-call markup into deliverables, and
43
+ produced empty output on content-type tasks.
44
+ - Worker handoffs are gated: leaked tool-call markup or an empty
45
+ deliverable triggers exactly one corrective re-run with a repair
46
+ directive; a repeat violation stops the run honestly with
47
+ `worker_output_contract_violation` (never a silent cleanup).
48
+ - A verifier rejection now triggers exactly one corrective synthesis pass
49
+ with the verifier's issues attached, then a re-verification. A second
50
+ rejection still fails honestly (`workforce_verification_failed`), now
51
+ reporting both attempts' issues.
52
+ - Selection handoff graphs are validated locally for circular
53
+ handsOffTo/reportsTo chains, so the structured repair loop fixes a cyclic
54
+ task force before the Hub sees it (previously a `task_force_cycle`
55
+ round-trip rejection).
56
+ - Failure display: verifier/server `issues` arrays are printed line by line
57
+ instead of being truncated inside a capped JSON blob.
58
+
3
59
  ## 1.0.1 — 2026-07-27
4
60
 
5
61
  - Fixes the two gates that failed on the v1.0.0 tag (never published):
@@ -33,6 +33,15 @@ const MAX_SLOTS = 32;
33
33
  const MAX_ASSIGNMENTS = 64;
34
34
  const MAX_MODEL_OUTPUT = 2 * 1024 * 1024;
35
35
  const MAX_STRUCTURED_MODEL_ATTEMPTS = 2;
36
+ // 도구가 0개인 워커가 도구 호출을 시도하면 그 문법이 산출물에 그대로 남는다.
37
+ // 속성 형태까지 요구해 산문에서 마크업을 "언급"만 한 경우의 오탐을 줄인다.
38
+ const HANDOFF_TOOL_MARKUP_RE = /<(?:antml:)?invoke\s+name=|<(?:antml:)?parameter\s+name=|<\/(?:antml:)?(?:invoke|parameter)>|<(?:antml:)?function_calls>/i;
39
+
40
+ function handoffContractViolation(text) {
41
+ if (HANDOFF_TOOL_MARKUP_RE.test(text)) return "tool_markup";
42
+ if (String(text).replace(/[\s`#*_>\-|:.~]+/g, "").length < 12) return "empty_deliverable";
43
+ return null;
44
+ }
36
45
  const MAX_REPAIR_PRIOR_OUTPUT = 64 * 1024;
37
46
  const MAX_WORK_ORDER_REFINEMENTS = 2;
38
47
  const MAX_SEARCH_TRANSPORT_ATTEMPTS = 2;
@@ -91,7 +100,11 @@ const HUB_PATH_PATTERNS = [
91
100
  /(?:^|[\s"'`()\[\]{}=:,;])~[/\\](?=\S)/,
92
101
  /(?<![A-Za-z0-9])[A-Za-z]:[/\\](?=\S)/,
93
102
  /(?:^|[\s"'`()\[\]{}=:,;])\\\\[^\\/\s]+[\\/][^\\/\s]+/,
94
- /(?<![A-Za-z0-9$])\/(?!\/|\s)(?:[^/\s"'`<>]+\/)*[^/\s"'`<>]+/,
103
+ // lookbehind가 ASCII만 제외하면 한글 단어 뒤 슬래시("진단/멱등키", "한국어/영어")
104
+ // 절대경로로 오탐된다(2026-07-27 실측 — 한국어 워크오더 전멸 원인). 문자·숫자
105
+ // 전반(\p{L}\p{N})을 제외해 "A/B" 표기는 통과시키고, 공백·행머리 뒤 실제 경로는
106
+ // 그대로 잡는다.
107
+ /(?<![\p{L}\p{N}$])\/(?!\/|\s)(?:[^/\s"'`<>]+\/)*[^/\s"'`<>]+/u,
95
108
  ];
96
109
  const HUB_SECRET_PATTERNS = [
97
110
  ["provider_token", /\b(?:sk-[A-Za-z0-9_-]{20,}|gh[pousr]_[A-Za-z0-9_]{20,}|github_pat_[A-Za-z0-9_]{20,}|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|xox[baprs]-[A-Za-z0-9-]{10,})\b/],
@@ -1124,6 +1137,32 @@ function validateSelection(value, candidateSet, workOrder, identity, options = {
1124
1137
  if (!["reportsTo", "handsOffTo", "reviews", "coordinatesWith"].includes(edge.relation)) fail("selection_invalid", "selection edge relation is invalid");
1125
1138
  assertIds(edge.artifactKinds, "selection edge artifactKinds");
1126
1139
  }
1140
+ // 엣지 사이클은 Hub validate가 task_force_cycle로 거절한다. 서버 규칙과 동일하게:
1141
+ // 관계 종류 불문 모든 엣지 + 자기참조가 사이클이다(reviews 맞교환도 거절 —
1142
+ // 2026-07-27 실측: handsOffTo만 검사하던 로컬 검증이 reviews 사이클을 통과시켜
1143
+ // 서버 거절로 되돌아왔다). 로컬에서 먼저 걸어야 재시도 루프가 왕복 없이 교정한다.
1144
+ {
1145
+ const adjacency = new Map();
1146
+ for (const edge of selection.edges) {
1147
+ if (edge.fromSlot === edge.toSlot) {
1148
+ fail("selection_invalid", `edges form a circular task force: ${edge.fromSlot} points at itself`);
1149
+ }
1150
+ if (!adjacency.has(edge.fromSlot)) adjacency.set(edge.fromSlot, []);
1151
+ adjacency.get(edge.fromSlot).push(edge.toSlot);
1152
+ }
1153
+ const states = new Map();
1154
+ const walk = (slot, trail) => {
1155
+ const state = states.get(slot);
1156
+ if (state === "done") return;
1157
+ if (state === "visiting") {
1158
+ fail("selection_invalid", `edges form a circular task force: ${[...trail, slot].join(" -> ")}`);
1159
+ }
1160
+ states.set(slot, "visiting");
1161
+ for (const next of adjacency.get(slot) || []) walk(next, [...trail, slot]);
1162
+ states.set(slot, "done");
1163
+ };
1164
+ for (const slot of adjacency.keys()) walk(slot, []);
1165
+ }
1127
1166
  for (const releaseId of assertIds(selection.alternativesConsidered, "selection.alternativesConsidered")) {
1128
1167
  if (!maps.all.has(releaseId)) fail("selection_invalid", `alternative ${releaseId} was outside the candidate set`);
1129
1168
  }
@@ -1597,6 +1636,7 @@ function buildPrompts(task, identity) {
1597
1636
  `Exact direct Selection example: ${stableJson(selectionShape)}`,
1598
1637
  "decisionAuthor must contain exactly kind, modelId, and runtimeId. Every required slot must have exactly its cardinality in assignments. Every assignment must contain exactly slotId, an exact candidate agentReleaseId, and a non-empty reasonCodes array.",
1599
1638
  "edges, alternativesConsidered, and requestExpansionForSlots must be explicitly authored arrays. Every edge must contain exactly fromSlot, toSlot, relation (one of reportsTo|handsOffTo|reviews|coordinatesWith), and artifactKinds. The host will not add or normalize fields.",
1639
+ "edges must form an acyclic directed graph regardless of relation — reviews and coordinatesWith count too, and a slot may never point at itself. Never author a circular chain (for example A reviews B while B reviews A); the Hub rejects circular task forces.",
1600
1640
  ].join("\n");
1601
1641
  const plannerSchemaRequirements = [
1602
1642
  `Return exactly one object: ${stableJson(plannerShape)}`,
@@ -2669,10 +2709,28 @@ function create(deps = {}) {
2669
2709
  workOrderInvocationId,
2670
2710
  };
2671
2711
 
2712
+ // 실황 내레이션: 사용자는 "누가 소집됐고 지금 뭘 하는지"를 보면서 신뢰를
2713
+ // 형성한다(2026-07-27 오너 요구). 결과에 영향 없는 표시 전용 — silent 존중.
2714
+ if (!ctx.silent) {
2715
+ const nameByRelease = new Map();
2716
+ for (const slotRow of candidateSet.slots) {
2717
+ for (const cand of slotRow.candidates) nameByRelease.set(cand.agentReleaseId, cand.name || cand.agentReleaseId);
2718
+ }
2719
+ const menuCount = candidateSet.slots.reduce((sum, slotRow) => sum + slotRow.candidates.length, 0);
2720
+ ui.info(ui.lang === "ko"
2721
+ ? `워크오더 ${workOrder.roleSlots.length}슬롯 · 허브 후보 ${menuCount}명 메뉴 수신`
2722
+ : `work order: ${workOrder.roleSlots.length} slot(s) · hub menu of ${menuCount} candidates`);
2723
+ for (const row of selection.assignments) {
2724
+ ui.info(ui.lang === "ko"
2725
+ ? ` 선발 ${row.slotId} ← ${nameByRelease.get(row.agentReleaseId) || row.agentReleaseId}`
2726
+ : ` picked ${row.slotId} ← ${nameByRelease.get(row.agentReleaseId) || row.agentReleaseId}`);
2727
+ }
2728
+ }
2672
2729
  const validationRaw = await hubStage("workforce.validate_selection", { workOrder, candidateSet, selection });
2673
2730
  validationReceipt = validateSelectionReceipt(validationRaw, selection, candidateSet, workOrder);
2674
2731
  benchmarkState.selectionValidation = validationReceipt;
2675
2732
  receipt.selectionReceiptId = validationReceipt.selectionReceiptId;
2733
+ if (!ctx.silent) ui.info(ui.lang === "ko" ? "허브 검증 수락 — 번들 준비 중" : "hub validation accepted — preparing bundles");
2676
2734
 
2677
2735
  const preparedRaw = await hubStage("workforce.prepare_execution", { workOrder, candidateSet, selection, validationReceipt });
2678
2736
  ({ prepared, rosterByPair } = validatePreparedExecution(preparedRaw, workOrder, selection, candidateSet, validationReceipt));
@@ -2864,7 +2922,13 @@ function create(deps = {}) {
2864
2922
 
2865
2923
  const runPinnedInvocation = async ({ pinned, system, prompt, label, grantedToolIds, extra = {} }) => {
2866
2924
  const invocationId = `workforce-invocation:${crypto.randomUUID()}`;
2867
- const text = assertString(await runModel(runtime, system, prompt, {
2925
+ // 워커는 도구 상태를 스스로 없다. 고지 없이 잠그면 존재하지 않는 도구를
2926
+ // 부르다 호출 문법이 산출물에 그대로 새고, 코드 저장소 워크플로를 가정한 채
2927
+ // 본 작업 없이 끝난다(2026-07-27 실측). 결정적 문자열만 사용(3-OS 바이트 패리티).
2928
+ const authorityDirective = grantedToolIds.length
2929
+ ? `EXECUTION AUTHORITY: only these exact granted tools exist for this invocation: ${grantedToolIds.join(", ")}. Every other tool, file, shell, or web access is unavailable; never emit a call to anything else.`
2930
+ : "EXECUTION AUTHORITY: zero tools are granted to this invocation — no file system, no shell, no web, no MCP, no subagents. Never emit tool-call syntax or XML-like invocation markup, and never explore or wait for a workspace. Author the complete deliverable directly in this reply as plain text or markdown, using only the packet inputs provided.";
2931
+ const text = assertString(await runModel(runtime, [system, authorityDirective].join("\n\n"), prompt, {
2868
2932
  ...modelContext,
2869
2933
  authorityMode: grantedToolIds.length ? "policy-filtered" : "no-authority",
2870
2934
  grantedToolIds,
@@ -2887,6 +2951,31 @@ function create(deps = {}) {
2887
2951
  };
2888
2952
  };
2889
2953
 
2954
+ // 핸드오프 산출물 전용 게이트: 도구 마크업/빈 산출물이면 교정 지시로 1회 재실행,
2955
+ // 재발 시 조용한 완화 대신 정직 정지(silent-default 금지 원칙).
2956
+ const runHandoffInvocation = async (args) => {
2957
+ const first = await runPinnedInvocation(args);
2958
+ const violation = handoffContractViolation(first.text);
2959
+ if (!violation) return first;
2960
+ const repairDirective = violation === "tool_markup"
2961
+ ? "HANDOFF REPAIR MODE: your previous reply contained raw tool-call markup, but no tools exist in this invocation. Rewrite the complete deliverable as plain text or markdown only, with zero tool-call syntax."
2962
+ : "HANDOFF REPAIR MODE: your previous reply contained no usable deliverable. You have everything you need in the packet inputs; author the complete concrete handoff artifact now, directly in this reply.";
2963
+ const retried = await runPinnedInvocation({
2964
+ ...args,
2965
+ system: [args.system, repairDirective].join("\n\n"),
2966
+ extra: { ...(args.extra || {}), handoffContractRetry: violation },
2967
+ });
2968
+ const repeat = handoffContractViolation(retried.text);
2969
+ if (repeat) {
2970
+ fail("worker_output_contract_violation", `${args.label} kept violating the handoff contract (${repeat}) after one corrective retry`, {
2971
+ violation: repeat,
2972
+ firstViolation: violation,
2973
+ label: args.label,
2974
+ });
2975
+ }
2976
+ return retried;
2977
+ };
2978
+
2890
2979
  const runNestedManagerPlan = async ({ pinned, packet, grantedToolIds }) => {
2891
2980
  const graph = pinned.executionGraph;
2892
2981
  const exactWorkerIds = graph.workers.map((row) => row.id);
@@ -2933,6 +3022,7 @@ function create(deps = {}) {
2933
3022
  const packet = delegationPlan.packets[index];
2934
3023
  const pair = `${packet.slotId}\0${packet.agentReleaseId}`;
2935
3024
  const pinned = rosterByPair.get(pair);
3025
+ if (!ctx.silent) ui.info(ui.lang === "ko" ? ` 워커 실행 중: ${packet.slotId}` : ` worker running: ${packet.slotId}`);
2936
3026
  const capabilityBindings = bindingsByPair.get(pair) || [];
2937
3027
  const grantedToolIds = [...new Set(capabilityBindings.map((row) => row.toolId))].sort();
2938
3028
  const startedAt = nowIso(D.now);
@@ -2941,7 +3031,7 @@ function create(deps = {}) {
2941
3031
  let directInvocation = null;
2942
3032
  let nestedExecutionId = null;
2943
3033
  if (pinned.entityKind === "agent") {
2944
- const direct = await runPinnedInvocation({
3034
+ const direct = await runHandoffInvocation({
2945
3035
  pinned,
2946
3036
  grantedToolIds,
2947
3037
  label: `worker ${packet.packetId}`,
@@ -2962,7 +3052,7 @@ function create(deps = {}) {
2962
3052
  const manager = await runNestedManagerPlan({ pinned, packet, grantedToolIds });
2963
3053
  const graphWorkerOutputs = await Promise.all(pinned.executionGraph.workers.map(async (graphWorker, workerIndex) => {
2964
3054
  const graphPacket = manager.plan.packets[workerIndex];
2965
- const invoked = await runPinnedInvocation({
3055
+ const invoked = await runHandoffInvocation({
2966
3056
  pinned,
2967
3057
  grantedToolIds,
2968
3058
  label: `nested worker ${graphWorker.id}`,
@@ -2978,7 +3068,7 @@ function create(deps = {}) {
2978
3068
  });
2979
3069
  return { graphWorker, graphPacket, text: invoked.text, invocation: invoked.invocation };
2980
3070
  }));
2981
- const managerSynthesis = await runPinnedInvocation({
3071
+ const managerSynthesis = await runHandoffInvocation({
2982
3072
  pinned,
2983
3073
  grantedToolIds,
2984
3074
  label: `nested manager synthesis ${packet.packetId}`,
@@ -3080,55 +3170,87 @@ function create(deps = {}) {
3080
3170
  if (rejectedWorker) throw rejectedWorker.reason;
3081
3171
 
3082
3172
  const synthesisAssignment = selection.assignments.find((row) => row.slotId === delegationPlan.synthesis.slotId && row.agentReleaseId === delegationPlan.synthesis.agentReleaseId);
3083
- const synthesisStarted = nowIso(D.now);
3084
- const synthesisInvocationId = `workforce-invocation:${crypto.randomUUID()}`;
3085
- const finalText = assertString(await runModel(runtime, [
3086
- "You are the top-level host LLM synthesizer for this immutable Agentlas workforce run.",
3087
- "Integrate the separate worker handoffs into one coherent deliverable. Preserve disagreements and explicitly name incomplete work. Do not claim a tool or worker ran unless its handoff is present.",
3088
- ].join("\n\n"), stableJson({ workOrder, synthesis: delegationPlan.synthesis, handoffs: outputs }), modelContext), "synthesis output", 1_000_000);
3089
- receipt.synthesis = {
3090
- schemaVersion: "agentlas.workforce-synthesis-receipt.v1",
3091
- receiptId: synthesisInvocationId,
3092
- invocationId: synthesisInvocationId,
3093
- modelId: identity.modelId,
3094
- runtimeId: identity.runtimeId,
3095
- provider,
3096
- status: "completed",
3097
- agentReleaseId: synthesisAssignment.agentReleaseId,
3098
- startedAt: synthesisStarted,
3099
- completedAt: nowIso(D.now),
3100
- inputChildReceiptIds: receipt.workers.filter((row) => row.status === "completed").map((row) => row.receiptId),
3101
- outputDigest: sha256(finalText),
3102
- };
3103
-
3104
3173
  const verifierAssignment = selection.assignments.find((row) => row.slotId === delegationPlan.verifier.slotId && row.agentReleaseId === delegationPlan.verifier.agentReleaseId);
3105
- const verifierStarted = nowIso(D.now);
3106
- const verifierInvocationId = `workforce-invocation:${crypto.randomUUID()}`;
3107
- const verifierRaw = await runModel(runtime, [
3108
- "You are the top-level host LLM verifier for this Agentlas workforce run.",
3109
- 'Evaluate the synthesis against every criterion and worker handoff. Return exactly one JSON object: {"schemaVersion":"agentlas.workforce-verification.v1","status":"passed|failed","checks":[{"checkId":"check:<id>","status":"passed|failed","evidence":"..."}],"issues":[]}.',
3110
- "Use double-quoted valid JSON. Passing requires evidence for every criterion; do not rubber-stamp.",
3111
- ].join("\n\n"), stableJson({ workOrder, criteria: delegationPlan.verifier.criteria, handoffs: outputs, synthesis: finalText }), modelContext);
3112
- const verification = validateVerifierResult(parseModelObject(verifierRaw, "workforce verifier"));
3113
- receipt.verifier = {
3114
- schemaVersion: "agentlas.workforce-verifier-receipt.v1",
3115
- receiptId: verifierInvocationId,
3116
- invocationId: verifierInvocationId,
3117
- modelId: identity.modelId,
3118
- runtimeId: identity.runtimeId,
3119
- provider,
3120
- status: "completed",
3121
- agentReleaseId: verifierAssignment.agentReleaseId,
3122
- startedAt: verifierStarted,
3123
- completedAt: nowIso(D.now),
3124
- inputSynthesisReceiptId: receipt.synthesis.receiptId,
3125
- outputDigest: sha256(verification),
3126
- result: verification,
3127
- verdict: verification.status === "passed" ? "pass" : "fail",
3128
- };
3174
+ // 검증자가 불합격을 내면 그 지적을 들고 합성을 1회 교정 후 재검증한다.
3175
+ // 시도의 영수증도 correctiveHistory로 보존한다(감사 추적 진실성).
3176
+ let finalText = null;
3177
+ let verification = null;
3178
+ let synthesisInvocationId = null;
3179
+ let verifierInvocationId = null;
3180
+ let priorAttempt = null;
3181
+ receipt.correctiveHistory = [];
3182
+ if (!ctx.silent) ui.info(ui.lang === "ko" ? "합성 → 검증 단계" : "synthesis → verification");
3183
+ for (let verifyAttempt = 1; verifyAttempt <= 2; verifyAttempt += 1) {
3184
+ const synthesisStarted = nowIso(D.now);
3185
+ synthesisInvocationId = `workforce-invocation:${crypto.randomUUID()}`;
3186
+ finalText = assertString(await runModel(runtime, [
3187
+ "You are the top-level host LLM synthesizer for this immutable Agentlas workforce run.",
3188
+ "Integrate the separate worker handoffs into one coherent deliverable. Preserve disagreements and explicitly name incomplete work. Do not claim a tool or worker ran unless its handoff is present.",
3189
+ verifyAttempt > 1 ? "CORRECTIVE SYNTHESIS MODE: a pinned verifier rejected the prior synthesis. Repair the deliverable so every criterion is satisfied using only the existing worker handoffs. Never invent work that did not run." : "",
3190
+ ].filter(Boolean).join("\n\n"), stableJson(verifyAttempt > 1
3191
+ ? { workOrder, synthesis: delegationPlan.synthesis, handoffs: outputs, priorSynthesis: priorAttempt.text, verifierRejection: priorAttempt.verification }
3192
+ : { workOrder, synthesis: delegationPlan.synthesis, handoffs: outputs }), modelContext), "synthesis output", 1_000_000);
3193
+ receipt.synthesis = {
3194
+ schemaVersion: "agentlas.workforce-synthesis-receipt.v1",
3195
+ receiptId: synthesisInvocationId,
3196
+ invocationId: synthesisInvocationId,
3197
+ modelId: identity.modelId,
3198
+ runtimeId: identity.runtimeId,
3199
+ provider,
3200
+ status: "completed",
3201
+ agentReleaseId: synthesisAssignment.agentReleaseId,
3202
+ startedAt: synthesisStarted,
3203
+ completedAt: nowIso(D.now),
3204
+ inputChildReceiptIds: receipt.workers.filter((row) => row.status === "completed").map((row) => row.receiptId),
3205
+ outputDigest: sha256(finalText),
3206
+ attempt: verifyAttempt,
3207
+ };
3208
+
3209
+ const verifierStarted = nowIso(D.now);
3210
+ verifierInvocationId = `workforce-invocation:${crypto.randomUUID()}`;
3211
+ const verifierRaw = await runModel(runtime, [
3212
+ "You are the top-level host LLM verifier for this Agentlas workforce run.",
3213
+ 'Evaluate the synthesis against every criterion and worker handoff. Return exactly one JSON object: {"schemaVersion":"agentlas.workforce-verification.v1","status":"passed|failed","checks":[{"checkId":"check:<id>","status":"passed|failed","evidence":"..."}],"issues":[]}.',
3214
+ "Use double-quoted valid JSON. Passing requires evidence for every criterion; do not rubber-stamp.",
3215
+ ].join("\n\n"), stableJson({ workOrder, criteria: delegationPlan.verifier.criteria, handoffs: outputs, synthesis: finalText }), modelContext);
3216
+ verification = validateVerifierResult(parseModelObject(verifierRaw, "workforce verifier"));
3217
+ receipt.verifier = {
3218
+ schemaVersion: "agentlas.workforce-verifier-receipt.v1",
3219
+ receiptId: verifierInvocationId,
3220
+ invocationId: verifierInvocationId,
3221
+ modelId: identity.modelId,
3222
+ runtimeId: identity.runtimeId,
3223
+ provider,
3224
+ status: "completed",
3225
+ agentReleaseId: verifierAssignment.agentReleaseId,
3226
+ startedAt: verifierStarted,
3227
+ completedAt: nowIso(D.now),
3228
+ inputSynthesisReceiptId: receipt.synthesis.receiptId,
3229
+ outputDigest: sha256(verification),
3230
+ result: verification,
3231
+ verdict: verification.status === "passed" ? "pass" : "fail",
3232
+ attempt: verifyAttempt,
3233
+ };
3234
+ if (verification.status === "passed") break;
3235
+ if (verifyAttempt === 1) {
3236
+ priorAttempt = { text: finalText, verification };
3237
+ receipt.correctiveHistory.push({
3238
+ synthesisReceiptId: synthesisInvocationId,
3239
+ verifierReceiptId: verifierInvocationId,
3240
+ synthesisOutputDigest: sha256(finalText),
3241
+ verification,
3242
+ });
3243
+ }
3244
+ }
3129
3245
 
3130
3246
  receipt.benchmarkAudit = auditBenchmarkReceipt(receipt);
3131
- if (verification.status !== "passed") fail("workforce_verification_failed", "pinned verifier rejected the synthesis", { issues: verification.issues });
3247
+ if (verification.status !== "passed") {
3248
+ fail("workforce_verification_failed", "pinned verifier rejected the synthesis twice (initial and one corrective retry)", {
3249
+ issues: verification.issues,
3250
+ correctiveRetryUsed: true,
3251
+ firstAttemptIssues: receipt.correctiveHistory[0]?.verification?.issues || [],
3252
+ });
3253
+ }
3132
3254
  if (ctx.benchmark === true && !receipt.benchmarkAudit.passed) fail("benchmark_receipt_incomplete", "benchmark mode requires planner, every child, synthesis, verifier, and no planner fallback", receipt.benchmarkAudit);
3133
3255
 
3134
3256
  receipt.status = "passed";
@@ -3236,10 +3358,20 @@ function create(deps = {}) {
3236
3358
  if (!ctx.silent) {
3237
3359
  // 서버/검증 거절 사유(details)는 영수증에만 남고 화면에서 누락되던 표시 결함 —
3238
3360
  // 정직 중계 원칙상 사유를 원문 그대로 병기한다(실사용 network 테스트에서 실증).
3239
- const detailText = receipt.failure.details
3240
- ? ` ${JSON.stringify(receipt.failure.details).slice(0, 600)}`
3361
+ // issues 배열은 JSON 캡에 잘리지 않도록 항목별로 온전히 표시한다.
3362
+ const details = receipt.failure.details;
3363
+ const issues = Array.isArray(details?.issues) ? details.issues : null;
3364
+ const otherDetails = details && typeof details === "object" && !Array.isArray(details)
3365
+ ? Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(details).filter(([key]) => key !== "issues"))
3366
+ : details;
3367
+ const detailText = otherDetails && (typeof otherDetails !== "object" || Object.keys(otherDetails).length)
3368
+ ? ` — ${JSON.stringify(otherDetails).slice(0, 1_200)}`
3241
3369
  : "";
3242
3370
  ui.error(`${receipt.failure.code}: ${receipt.failure.message}${detailText}`);
3371
+ if (issues) {
3372
+ for (const issue of issues.slice(0, 16)) ui.error(` - ${String(issue).slice(0, 400)}`);
3373
+ if (issues.length > 16) ui.error(` … ${issues.length - 16} more issues in the persisted receipt`);
3374
+ }
3243
3375
  }
3244
3376
  return { ok: false, error: receipt.failure, receipt, benchmarkArtifactPath };
3245
3377
  }
@@ -127,7 +127,9 @@ function main() {
127
127
  */
128
128
  if (!agent && normalized.length === 1 && /^[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9._:-]*$/.test(normalized[0])) {
129
129
  const token = normalized[0];
130
- const names = Object.keys(commands.COMMANDS).concat(commands.NOT_YET_PORTED || []);
130
+ const names = Object.keys(commands.COMMANDS)
131
+ .concat(Object.keys(commands.COMMAND_ALIASES || {}))
132
+ .concat(commands.NOT_YET_PORTED || []);
131
133
  const near = nearestCommands(token, names);
132
134
  const ko = ctx.lang === "ko";
133
135
  ctx.err(ko
@@ -103,9 +103,32 @@ const DESKTOP_ONLY_SURFACES = {
103
103
  // 무인자 호출이 프롬프트로 오라우팅되면 안 되는 명령 (smoke 가드 대상)
104
104
  const GUARDED_NO_ARG = new Set(["search", "install", "upload"]);
105
105
 
106
+ // 플랫폼 간 이름 통일(오너 결정 2026-07-27): 클로드코드/코덱스에서 부르는 hep-*
107
+ // 스킬명과 터미널 명령이 서로 다르면 사용자가 어느 표면에 있는지에 따라 이름을
108
+ // 바꿔 써야 한다. 같은 기능은 어디서든 같은 이름으로 부른다.
109
+ const COMMAND_ALIASES = {
110
+ "hep-network": "workforce",
111
+ network: "workforce",
112
+ "hep-cloud": "cloud",
113
+ "hep-build": "build",
114
+ "hep-call": "call",
115
+ "hep-search": "search",
116
+ "hep-upload": "upload",
117
+ "hep-storm": "storm",
118
+ "hep-browser": "browser",
119
+ "hep-connect": "connect",
120
+ "hep-local": "workforce",
121
+ "hep-hub": "search",
122
+ };
123
+
124
+ function resolveCommandName(cmd) {
125
+ return COMMAND_ALIASES[cmd] || cmd;
126
+ }
127
+
106
128
  function dispatch(ctx, argv) {
107
- const [cmd, ...rest] = argv;
108
- if (!cmd) return null; // 엔진이 REPL로 진입
129
+ const [rawCmd, ...rest] = argv;
130
+ if (!rawCmd) return null; // 엔진이 REPL로 진입
131
+ const cmd = resolveCommandName(rawCmd);
109
132
 
110
133
  if (COMMANDS[cmd]) {
111
134
  return COMMANDS[cmd]().run(ctx, rest);
@@ -133,4 +156,4 @@ function dispatch(ctx, argv) {
133
156
  return undefined; // 알 수 없는 토큰 — 엔진이 에이전트 이름/프롬프트로 해석 시도
134
157
  }
135
158
 
136
- module.exports = { dispatch, COMMANDS, NOT_YET_PORTED, GUARDED_NO_ARG, DESKTOP_ONLY_SURFACES };
159
+ module.exports = { dispatch, COMMANDS, COMMAND_ALIASES, resolveCommandName, NOT_YET_PORTED, GUARDED_NO_ARG, DESKTOP_ONLY_SURFACES };
@@ -359,7 +359,13 @@ function captureRuntime(kind, systemPrompt, prompt, opts) {
359
359
  const stdout = Buffer.concat(stdoutChunks).toString("utf8");
360
360
  const stderr = Buffer.concat(stderrChunks).toString("utf8");
361
361
  if (code && code !== 0) {
362
- finishReject(new Error(`${kind} exited ${code}: ${stderr.slice(-500)}`));
362
+ // stderr가 경고문뿐이면 진짜 원인이 stdout(JSON 오류 응답 )에 있을 수 있다 —
363
+ // 2026-07-27 실측: 워커 exit 1이 설정 경고 2줄만 남기고 원인 불명이 됐다.
364
+ // 두 스트림의 꼬리를 모두 싣는다.
365
+ const stdoutTail = stdout.trim().slice(-400);
366
+ finishReject(new Error(
367
+ `${kind} exited ${code}: ${stderr.slice(-500)}${stdoutTail ? `\n--- stdout tail ---\n${stdoutTail}` : ""}`,
368
+ ));
363
369
  return;
364
370
  }
365
371
  const raw = stdout.trim() || stderr.trim();
@@ -425,7 +425,13 @@ function buildWorkforceDeps(ctx = {}) {
425
425
  // v1과 동일: callHubTool은 주입하지 않는다. 워크포스 모듈 내부의 jsonrpc 경로가
426
426
  // 거절 코드 원문 전파·retryClass 계약을 소유하며, fetchHub는 버퍼드
427
427
  // {ok,status,headers,text} 어댑터 형태를 만족한다(3중 타임아웃 + 16MB 상한).
428
- fetchHub: (url, init) => hubClient.fetchHub(url, init),
428
+ // 워크포스 전용 타임아웃: prepare_execution은 서버가 로스터 번들을 조립하는 동안
429
+ // 첫 바이트 없이 계산한다(1슬롯 실측 7.2s, 다슬롯은 그 배수). 기본 connect 15s는
430
+ // 실제로는 "응답 헤더까지"를 재므로 다슬롯 준비를 처형한다(2026-07-27 전송오류
431
+ // 2연속의 진범). 준비 상한을 여유 있게 준다 — idle/total 계약은 유지.
432
+ fetchHub: (url, init) => hubClient.fetchHub(url, init, {
433
+ timeoutConfig: { connectMs: 120_000, idleMs: 60_000, totalMs: 300_000 },
434
+ }),
429
435
  resolveRuntime: resolveWorkforceRuntime,
430
436
  captureRuntime: capture.captureRuntime,
431
437
  runApi: capture.runApi,
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "agentlas",
3
- "version": "1.0.1",
4
- "description": "Agentlas agent terminal \u2014 chat with your installed AI agents and teams from the terminal, Claude Code style. Standalone: no desktop app required.",
3
+ "version": "1.0.3",
4
+ "description": "Agentlas agent terminal chat with your installed AI agents and teams from the terminal, Claude Code style. Standalone: no desktop app required.",
5
5
  "bin": {
6
6
  "agentlas": "bin/agentlas.cjs"
7
7
  },