agentic-team-templates 0.8.3 → 0.9.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +2 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/templates/product-manager/.cursorrules/communication.md +353 -0
- package/templates/product-manager/.cursorrules/discovery.md +258 -0
- package/templates/product-manager/.cursorrules/metrics.md +319 -0
- package/templates/product-manager/.cursorrules/overview.md +95 -0
- package/templates/product-manager/.cursorrules/prioritization.md +240 -0
- package/templates/product-manager/.cursorrules/requirements.md +371 -0
- package/templates/product-manager/CLAUDE.md +593 -0
- package/templates/qa-engineering/.cursorrules/automation.md +460 -0
- package/templates/qa-engineering/.cursorrules/metrics.md +292 -0
- package/templates/qa-engineering/.cursorrules/overview.md +125 -0
- package/templates/qa-engineering/.cursorrules/quality-gates.md +372 -0
- package/templates/qa-engineering/.cursorrules/test-design.md +301 -0
- package/templates/qa-engineering/.cursorrules/test-strategy.md +218 -0
- package/templates/qa-engineering/CLAUDE.md +726 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# QA Metrics
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Guidelines for measuring and improving quality.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## Key QA Metrics
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
### Defect Metrics
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
| Metric | Formula | Target | Purpose |
|
|
10
|
+
|--------|---------|--------|---------|
|
|
11
|
+
| Defect Density | Defects / KLOC | < 1.0 | Code quality indicator |
|
|
12
|
+
| Defect Escape Rate | Prod Defects / Total Defects × 100 | < 5% | Testing effectiveness |
|
|
13
|
+
| Defect Removal Efficiency | (Pre-release Defects / Total Defects) × 100 | > 95% | QA effectiveness |
|
|
14
|
+
| Defect Leakage | Defects found post-release | < 5/release | Release quality |
|
|
15
|
+
| MTTR | Time to fix defects | < 24h (P1) | Response efficiency |
|
|
16
|
+
| Defect Aging | Days defect remains open | < 5 days avg | Process efficiency |
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
### Coverage Metrics
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
| Metric | Formula | Target | Purpose |
|
|
21
|
+
|--------|---------|--------|---------|
|
|
22
|
+
| Code Coverage | Lines covered / Total lines × 100 | > 80% | Test thoroughness |
|
|
23
|
+
| Branch Coverage | Branches covered / Total branches × 100 | > 70% | Decision path testing |
|
|
24
|
+
| Requirement Coverage | Requirements with tests / Total requirements × 100 | 100% | Traceability |
|
|
25
|
+
| Risk Coverage | High-risk areas tested / Total high-risk areas × 100 | 100% | Risk mitigation |
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### Execution Metrics
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
| Metric | Formula | Target | Purpose |
|
|
30
|
+
|--------|---------|--------|---------|
|
|
31
|
+
| Test Pass Rate | Passed / Executed × 100 | > 95% | Test health |
|
|
32
|
+
| Test Execution Rate | Executed / Planned × 100 | 100% | Execution completeness |
|
|
33
|
+
| Automation Rate | Automated / Total tests × 100 | > 70% | Automation maturity |
|
|
34
|
+
| Flaky Test Rate | Flaky tests / Total automated × 100 | < 2% | Automation reliability |
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
## Defect Analysis
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
### Defect Density Calculation
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
```markdown
|
|
41
|
+
## Defect Density Report
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
### By Component
|
|
44
|
+
| Component | KLOC | Defects | Density |
|
|
45
|
+
|-----------|------|---------|---------|
|
|
46
|
+
| Auth Service | 5.2 | 3 | 0.58 |
|
|
47
|
+
| Payment Module | 8.1 | 12 | 1.48 |
|
|
48
|
+
| User API | 3.4 | 1 | 0.29 |
|
|
49
|
+
| Dashboard UI | 6.8 | 4 | 0.59 |
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### Trend
|
|
52
|
+
| Sprint | KLOC (New) | Defects | Density |
|
|
53
|
+
|--------|------------|---------|---------|
|
|
54
|
+
| S1 | 4.5 | 2 | 0.44 |
|
|
55
|
+
| S2 | 5.1 | 3 | 0.59 |
|
|
56
|
+
| S3 | 6.2 | 8 | 1.29 |
|
|
57
|
+
| S4 | 3.8 | 2 | 0.53 |
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### Action Items
|
|
60
|
+
- Payment Module density too high - schedule code review
|
|
61
|
+
- S3 spike investigation - new developer onboarding
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
### Defect Escape Rate
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
```markdown
|
|
67
|
+
## Escape Rate Analysis
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### Current Period
|
|
70
|
+
| Stage | Defects Found | % of Total |
|
|
71
|
+
|-------|---------------|------------|
|
|
72
|
+
| Development | 45 | 45% |
|
|
73
|
+
| QA Testing | 40 | 40% |
|
|
74
|
+
| Staging | 10 | 10% |
|
|
75
|
+
| Production | 5 | 5% |
|
|
76
|
+
| **Total** | **100** | **100%** |
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
### Escape Rate = 5 / 100 × 100 = 5%
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
### Root Cause of Escapes
|
|
81
|
+
| Defect | Root Cause | Prevention |
|
|
82
|
+
|--------|------------|------------|
|
|
83
|
+
| DEF-101 | Edge case not in requirements | Add to test strategy |
|
|
84
|
+
| DEF-102 | Environment difference | Improve staging parity |
|
|
85
|
+
| DEF-103 | Race condition | Add concurrency tests |
|
|
86
|
+
| DEF-104 | Browser-specific issue | Expand browser matrix |
|
|
87
|
+
| DEF-105 | Data-dependent bug | Improve test data variety |
|
|
88
|
+
```
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
### Defect Removal Efficiency
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
```markdown
|
|
93
|
+
## DRE Calculation
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
DRE = (Defects found before release / Total defects) × 100
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
### Example
|
|
98
|
+
- Found in Dev: 50
|
|
99
|
+
- Found in QA: 40
|
|
100
|
+
- Found in Staging: 8
|
|
101
|
+
- Found in Production: 2
|
|
102
|
+
- **Total: 100**
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
DRE = (50 + 40 + 8) / 100 × 100 = **98%**
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
### DRE by Phase
|
|
107
|
+
| Phase | Found | Cumulative | DRE at Phase |
|
|
108
|
+
|-------|-------|------------|--------------|
|
|
109
|
+
| Development | 50 | 50 | 50% |
|
|
110
|
+
| QA | 40 | 90 | 90% |
|
|
111
|
+
| Staging | 8 | 98 | 98% |
|
|
112
|
+
| Production | 2 | 100 | - |
|
|
113
|
+
```
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
## Test Execution Dashboard
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
### Daily Report
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
```markdown
|
|
120
|
+
## Test Execution: [Date]
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
### Summary
|
|
123
|
+
| Metric | Today | Trend |
|
|
124
|
+
|--------|-------|-------|
|
|
125
|
+
| Tests Executed | 450 | +12 |
|
|
126
|
+
| Pass Rate | 96.2% | +0.5% |
|
|
127
|
+
| New Failures | 3 | -2 |
|
|
128
|
+
| Blockers | 1 | Same |
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
### By Test Type
|
|
131
|
+
| Type | Total | Passed | Failed | Blocked | Pass Rate |
|
|
132
|
+
|------|-------|--------|--------|---------|-----------|
|
|
133
|
+
| Smoke | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
|
|
134
|
+
| Regression | 300 | 290 | 8 | 2 | 96.7% |
|
|
135
|
+
| New Features | 125 | 118 | 7 | 0 | 94.4% |
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
### Failed Tests
|
|
138
|
+
| Test | Error | Priority | Assigned |
|
|
139
|
+
|------|-------|----------|----------|
|
|
140
|
+
| checkout_payment | Timeout | P1 | @dev1 |
|
|
141
|
+
| user_profile_update | 500 error | P2 | @dev2 |
|
|
142
|
+
| search_filters | Wrong results | P2 | @dev3 |
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
### Blocked Tests
|
|
145
|
+
| Test | Blocker | ETA |
|
|
146
|
+
|------|---------|-----|
|
|
147
|
+
| admin_dashboard | DEF-456 | Tomorrow |
|
|
148
|
+
| export_reports | Env issue | Today PM |
|
|
149
|
+
```
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
### Sprint Report
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
```markdown
|
|
154
|
+
## Sprint Quality Report: Sprint [N]
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
### Goals vs. Actuals
|
|
157
|
+
| Goal | Target | Actual | Status |
|
|
158
|
+
|------|--------|--------|--------|
|
|
159
|
+
| Test Coverage | 80% | 82% | ✅ |
|
|
160
|
+
| Pass Rate | 95% | 97% | ✅ |
|
|
161
|
+
| P1 Defects Resolved | 100% | 100% | ✅ |
|
|
162
|
+
| Automation Added | 20 tests | 18 tests | ⚠️ |
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
### Defect Summary
|
|
165
|
+
| Severity | Opened | Closed | Open |
|
|
166
|
+
|----------|--------|--------|------|
|
|
167
|
+
| P0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
168
|
+
| P1 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
|
|
169
|
+
| P2 | 8 | 6 | 2 |
|
|
170
|
+
| P3 | 12 | 8 | 4 |
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
### Quality Trends
|
|
173
|
+
```text
|
|
174
|
+
Pass Rate (last 5 sprints)
|
|
175
|
+
S1: ████████████████████░░░░ 85%
|
|
176
|
+
S2: ██████████████████████░░ 92%
|
|
177
|
+
S3: ███████████████████████░ 95%
|
|
178
|
+
S4: ████████████████████████ 98%
|
|
179
|
+
S5: ███████████████████████░ 97%
|
|
180
|
+
```
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
### Risks for Next Sprint
|
|
183
|
+
1. Large refactor planned - increase regression scope
|
|
184
|
+
2. New third-party integration - add integration tests
|
|
185
|
+
3. Performance concerns flagged - schedule load testing
|
|
186
|
+
```
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
## Quality Gates
|
|
189
|
+
|
|
190
|
+
### Release Quality Gate
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
```markdown
|
|
193
|
+
## Release Quality Gate: v[X.Y.Z]
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
### Mandatory Criteria
|
|
196
|
+
| Criterion | Threshold | Actual | Status |
|
|
197
|
+
|-----------|-----------|--------|--------|
|
|
198
|
+
| P0 Tests Pass | 100% | 100% | ✅ |
|
|
199
|
+
| P1 Tests Pass | 100% | 100% | ✅ |
|
|
200
|
+
| Open P0 Defects | 0 | 0 | ✅ |
|
|
201
|
+
| Open P1 Defects | 0 | 0 | ✅ |
|
|
202
|
+
| Regression Pass Rate | > 95% | 97.2% | ✅ |
|
|
203
|
+
| Code Coverage | > 80% | 84% | ✅ |
|
|
204
|
+
| Security Scan | 0 critical/high | 0 | ✅ |
|
|
205
|
+
|
|
206
|
+
### Performance Criteria
|
|
207
|
+
| Metric | Threshold | Actual | Status |
|
|
208
|
+
|--------|-----------|--------|--------|
|
|
209
|
+
| Response Time (p95) | < 500ms | 423ms | ✅ |
|
|
210
|
+
| Error Rate | < 0.1% | 0.02% | ✅ |
|
|
211
|
+
| Throughput | > 1000 rps | 1250 rps | ✅ |
|
|
212
|
+
|
|
213
|
+
### Exceptions
|
|
214
|
+
| Item | Justification | Approved By |
|
|
215
|
+
|------|---------------|-------------|
|
|
216
|
+
| P2 Defect DEF-789 | Low impact, fix in next sprint | Product Owner |
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
### Sign-off
|
|
219
|
+
| Role | Name | Date | Approved |
|
|
220
|
+
|------|------|------|----------|
|
|
221
|
+
| QA Lead | | | ☐ |
|
|
222
|
+
| Dev Lead | | | ☐ |
|
|
223
|
+
| Product Owner | | | ☐ |
|
|
224
|
+
```
|
|
225
|
+
|
|
226
|
+
## Continuous Improvement
|
|
227
|
+
|
|
228
|
+
### Metric Review Cadence
|
|
229
|
+
|
|
230
|
+
| Review | Frequency | Participants | Focus |
|
|
231
|
+
|--------|-----------|--------------|-------|
|
|
232
|
+
| Daily Standup | Daily | QA Team | Blockers, progress |
|
|
233
|
+
| Sprint Retrospective | Bi-weekly | Team | Process improvement |
|
|
234
|
+
| Quality Review | Monthly | Leadership | Trends, investments |
|
|
235
|
+
| Quarterly Planning | Quarterly | All | Strategy, goals |
|
|
236
|
+
|
|
237
|
+
### Improvement Actions
|
|
238
|
+
|
|
239
|
+
```markdown
|
|
240
|
+
## Quality Improvement Plan
|
|
241
|
+
|
|
242
|
+
### Current State
|
|
243
|
+
- Defect escape rate: 8%
|
|
244
|
+
- Automation coverage: 55%
|
|
245
|
+
- Average defect age: 8 days
|
|
246
|
+
|
|
247
|
+
### Target State (Q2)
|
|
248
|
+
- Defect escape rate: < 5%
|
|
249
|
+
- Automation coverage: > 70%
|
|
250
|
+
- Average defect age: < 5 days
|
|
251
|
+
|
|
252
|
+
### Actions
|
|
253
|
+
| Action | Owner | Deadline | Status |
|
|
254
|
+
|--------|-------|----------|--------|
|
|
255
|
+
| Add API test coverage for payments | @qa1 | Feb 15 | In Progress |
|
|
256
|
+
| Implement visual regression testing | @qa2 | Feb 28 | Not Started |
|
|
257
|
+
| Reduce flaky tests to < 2% | @qa1 | Feb 10 | In Progress |
|
|
258
|
+
| Add security scanning to CI | @devops | Feb 20 | Complete |
|
|
259
|
+
|
|
260
|
+
### Success Metrics
|
|
261
|
+
- Track escape rate weekly
|
|
262
|
+
- Review automation coverage bi-weekly
|
|
263
|
+
- Monitor defect aging daily
|
|
264
|
+
```
|
|
265
|
+
|
|
266
|
+
### Trend Analysis
|
|
267
|
+
|
|
268
|
+
Track metrics over time to identify patterns:
|
|
269
|
+
|
|
270
|
+
```markdown
|
|
271
|
+
## 6-Month Trend Analysis
|
|
272
|
+
|
|
273
|
+
### Defect Escape Rate
|
|
274
|
+
| Month | Rate | Trend |
|
|
275
|
+
|-------|------|-------|
|
|
276
|
+
| Aug | 12% | - |
|
|
277
|
+
| Sep | 9% | ↓ |
|
|
278
|
+
| Oct | 7% | ↓ |
|
|
279
|
+
| Nov | 8% | ↑ |
|
|
280
|
+
| Dec | 5% | ↓ |
|
|
281
|
+
| Jan | 4% | ↓ |
|
|
282
|
+
|
|
283
|
+
### Insights
|
|
284
|
+
- Significant improvement after automation investment (Oct)
|
|
285
|
+
- November spike due to holiday staffing
|
|
286
|
+
- On track to meet < 5% target
|
|
287
|
+
|
|
288
|
+
### Recommendations
|
|
289
|
+
1. Maintain automation investment
|
|
290
|
+
2. Cross-train team for coverage
|
|
291
|
+
3. Document high-risk areas for new team members
|
|
292
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# QA Engineering
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Principal-level guidelines for quality assurance and test engineering.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## Scope
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
This ruleset applies to:
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
- Test strategy and planning
|
|
10
|
+
- Test case design and execution
|
|
11
|
+
- Test automation architecture
|
|
12
|
+
- Quality metrics and reporting
|
|
13
|
+
- Release quality gates
|
|
14
|
+
- Defect management
|
|
15
|
+
- QA process governance
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## Core Philosophy
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
**Quality is a team responsibility; QA enables it.** Testing doesn't create quality—it reveals the quality that development created. QA's role is to provide fast, accurate feedback that enables confident delivery.
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Fundamental Principles
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
### 1. Shift Left
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
Find defects early when they're cheapest to fix.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
```text
|
|
28
|
+
Cost to fix defect:
|
|
29
|
+
Requirements → Design → Development → Testing → Production
|
|
30
|
+
$1 $10 $100 $500 $10,000
|
|
31
|
+
```
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
### 2. Risk-Based Testing
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
Not all features are equally important. Focus testing effort on:
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
- High business impact (revenue, compliance, security)
|
|
38
|
+
- High user impact (frequently used, critical workflows)
|
|
39
|
+
- High technical risk (complex, new technology, integrations)
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### 3. Test Pyramid
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
More unit tests, fewer E2E tests:
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
```text
|
|
46
|
+
┌─────┐
|
|
47
|
+
│ E2E │ 10% - Slow, expensive, high confidence
|
|
48
|
+
├─────┤
|
|
49
|
+
│ Int │ 30% - Medium speed, component interaction
|
|
50
|
+
├─────┤
|
|
51
|
+
│Unit │ 60% - Fast, cheap, immediate feedback
|
|
52
|
+
└─────┘
|
|
53
|
+
```
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
### 4. Automation as Accelerator
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
Automate the repeatable; humans do the creative:
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
- Automate: Regression, smoke tests, data-driven tests
|
|
60
|
+
- Manual: Exploratory, usability, edge cases
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
### 5. Continuous Quality Feedback
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
Quality metrics should be:
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
- Visible: Everyone sees the current state
|
|
67
|
+
- Actionable: Drive specific improvements
|
|
68
|
+
- Timely: Available immediately, not end of sprint
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Project Structure
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
```text
|
|
73
|
+
tests/
|
|
74
|
+
├── unit/ # Fast, isolated tests
|
|
75
|
+
│ ├── components/
|
|
76
|
+
│ ├── utils/
|
|
77
|
+
│ └── services/
|
|
78
|
+
├── integration/ # Component interaction tests
|
|
79
|
+
│ ├── api/
|
|
80
|
+
│ └── database/
|
|
81
|
+
├── e2e/ # End-to-end user flows
|
|
82
|
+
│ ├── specs/
|
|
83
|
+
│ ├── pages/ # Page objects
|
|
84
|
+
│ └── fixtures/ # Test data
|
|
85
|
+
├── performance/ # Load and stress tests
|
|
86
|
+
├── security/ # Security scan configs
|
|
87
|
+
└── test-utils/ # Shared test utilities
|
|
88
|
+
├── factories/ # Test data factories
|
|
89
|
+
├── mocks/ # Mock implementations
|
|
90
|
+
└── helpers/ # Common test helpers
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
docs/
|
|
93
|
+
├── test-strategy.md # Overall test strategy
|
|
94
|
+
├── test-plan.md # Current release plan
|
|
95
|
+
└── runbooks/ # Test execution guides
|
|
96
|
+
```
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
## Quality Standards
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
### Code Coverage Targets
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
| Type | Target | Rationale |
|
|
103
|
+
|------|--------|-----------|
|
|
104
|
+
| Unit tests | 80%+ | Core logic covered |
|
|
105
|
+
| Branch coverage | 70%+ | Decision paths tested |
|
|
106
|
+
| Critical paths | 100% | No untested critical code |
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
### Defect Standards
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
| Severity | Response Time | Resolution Target |
|
|
111
|
+
|----------|---------------|-------------------|
|
|
112
|
+
| P0 (Critical) | Immediate | Same day |
|
|
113
|
+
| P1 (Major) | < 4 hours | 24-48 hours |
|
|
114
|
+
| P2 (Moderate) | < 24 hours | Current sprint |
|
|
115
|
+
| P3 (Minor) | < 48 hours | Next sprint |
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
### Release Quality Gate
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
No release without:
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
- [ ] All P0/P1 tests passing
|
|
122
|
+
- [ ] No open P0/P1 defects
|
|
123
|
+
- [ ] Regression suite > 95% pass
|
|
124
|
+
- [ ] Security scan clean
|
|
125
|
+
- [ ] Performance thresholds met
|