agentic-sdlc 1.6.0 → 1.8.1

package/docs/artifacts/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# Artifacts Directory
+
+This folder stores IDE-generated artifacts that must be persisted for self-learning.
+
+## What Goes Here
+
+| Artifact Type | Example |
+|---------------|---------|
+| Analysis reports | `2026-01-05-workflow-analysis.md` |
+| Task summaries | `2026-01-05-task-refactoring.md` |
+| Investigation reports | `2026-01-05-explore-auth.md` |
+| Gap analysis | `2026-01-05-gap-analysis.md` |
+
+## Naming Convention
+
+```
+[YYYY-MM-DD]-[task-name].md
+```
+
+## Sync to Neo4j
+
+After adding artifacts:
+
+```bash
+agentic-sdlc kb compound sync
+```

package/docs/guides/MCP-GUIDE.md

@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ The following servers are integrated into the team roles. Ensure these are confi
 | **GitIngest** | Codebase snapshots | @ORCHESTRATOR, @REPORTER |
 | **Apidog** | API Testing & Design | @SA, @TESTER |
 | **Brave Search** | External Research | @PM, @PO |
+| **Deep Search** | Technical Research (DDG + GitHub + StackOverflow) | @RESEARCH, @SA, @DEV |
 | **Firecrawl** | Web Scraper / Log research | @SECA, @DEVOPS |
 | **Playwright** | E2E / Browser Testing | @QA, @TESTER |
 | **Context7** | Architecture Analysis | @SA, @DEV |

package/docs/reports/2026-01-05-autogen-evaluation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# Evaluation Report: Microsoft AutoGen Integration
+
+**Date:** 2026-01-05
+**Status:** Draft
+**Author:** @BRAIN (Research)
+
+## 1. Executive Summary
+This report evaluates the applicability of **Microsoft AutoGen** (specifically v0.4+) to the **Agentic SDLC** project.
+
+**Conclusion:** AutoGen represents a significant paradigm shift from the current `CLI + Workflow` architecture to a `Runtime + Event-Driven` architecture. While it offers powerful capabilities for autonomous multi-agent collaboration and state management, a full migration would require substantial refactoring.
+**Recommendation:** We recommend a **Phased Adoption (Hybrid Approach)**, starting with a pilot implementation for the `@Orchestrator` role or a specific complex workflow (e.g., `/sprint`), while maintaining the existing stable CLI tools for atomic tasks.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Microsoft AutoGen Overview
+AutoGen is a framework for building event-driven, distributed, agentic applications.
+*   **Core Unit:** `ConversableAgent` (an object that can send/receive messages).
+*   **Key Features:**
+    *   **Multi-Agent Conversation:** Built-in patterns for Two-Agent Chat, Group Chat, and Hierarchical Chat.
+    *   **Human-in-the-loop:** `UserProxyAgent` allows seamless human intervention.
+    *   **Code Execution:** Native support for executing code (Docker/Local) within conversations.
+    *   **Tool Use:** Agents can be equipped with functions (Tools) to interact with the environment.
+    *   **Ecosystem:** v0.4 introduces an event-driven architecture, enabling distributed agents and better scalability.
+
+## 3. Current "Agentic SDLC" Architecture Analysis
+The current system acts as a **Meta-Level Controller** using a "Brain" workflow.
+*   **Architecture:** `CLI-First`. Interactions are discrete tool calls driven by prompt engineering and static Markdown definitions (`.agent/skills/`, `.agent/workflows/`).
+*   **Execution Model:** "Run & Stop". Scripts in `tools/` run, perform an action, and exit. State is persisted in files (Markdown, JSON) or Neo4j.
+*   **Pros:** Simple, transparent, stateless (easy to debug), strongly typed workflows (Markdown).
+*   **Cons:** Limited "autonomy" between steps; rigid workflow adherence; limited inter-agent negotiation (requires user as relay).
+
+## 4. Gap Analysis
+
+| Feature | Agentic SDLC (Current) | Microsoft AutoGen (Target) | Gap/Bridge |
+| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
+| **Agent Definition** | Markdown Prompts + CLI Tools | Python Classes (`AssistantAgent`) | Requires wrapping Prompts into Class metadata. |
+| **Communication** | Invisible (Prompt -> Tool -> Output) | Explicit Message Passing | Needs a message loop (runtime). |
+| **Orchestration** | User / Static Workflow Files | Dynamic GroupChat Manager | AutoGen excels here. |
+| **Human Inputs** | `notify_user` / Interrupts | `UserProxyAgent` | Direct replacement possible. |
+| **Tools** | `tools/` directory (Python scripts) | `autogen.tools` | Existing tools can be registered easily. |
+
+## 5. Integration Scenarios
+
+### Scenario A: The "Super-Tool" (Recommended Pilot)
+Treat AutoGen as a *Tool* within the existing SDLC.
+*   **Concept:** Create a new tool `tools/autogen/runner.py`.
+*   **Usage:** The current Brain invokes this tool to spin up a simpler sub-team (e.g., "Solver Team: Dev + Tester") to solve a specific hard problem autonomously.
+*   **Pros:** Low risk, high value for complex tasks.
+*   **Cons:** Context switching between "System Agent" and "AutoGen Sub-agents".
+
+### Scenario B: The "Brain Replacement" (Long Term)
+Refactor the entire `bin/agentic-sdlc` CLI to wrap an AutoGen runtime.
+*   **Concept:** When the user types `/orchestrator`, it launches a persistent AutoGen `GroupChat` involving `@PM`, `@Dev`, etc.
+*   **Pros:** True agentic autonomy, dynamic planning.
+*   **Cons:** Complete rewrite of the Supervisor layer.
+
+## 6. Proposed Pilot: "The Auto-Coder"
+We propose building a pilot module using AutoGen to handle the `/emergency` or `/debug` workflow.
+**Objective:** Give an AutoGen "Debugger Agent" access to `grep`, `read_file`, and `run_test` tools and let it autonomously find root causes without constant user prompting.
+
+## 7. Next Steps
+1.  **Prototype:** Create a `tools/experiment/autogen_pilot.py`.
+2.  **Define:** Map the `@DEV` and `@TESTER` roles to AutoGen definitions.
+3.  **Evaluate:** Measure if the AutoGen loop resolves bugs faster than the manual `/debug` workflow.

package/docs/reports/2026-01-05-brain-layer-analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# 🧠 Brain Root Layer Analysis
+
+**Date:** 2026-01-05  
+**Issue:** Brain components not working during agent chat
+
+---
+
+## Current State: All Tools EXIST ✅
+
+| Component | Script | Lines | Status |
+|-----------|--------|-------|--------|
+| Observer | `tools/brain/observer.py` | 297 | ✅ Implemented |
+| Judge | `tools/brain/judge.py` | 341 | ✅ Implemented |
+| Learner | `tools/brain/learner.py` | 298 | ✅ Implemented |
+| A/B Tester | `tools/brain/ab_tester.py` | 353 | ✅ Implemented |
+| Model Optimizer | `tools/brain/model_optimizer.py` | 341 | ✅ Implemented |
+| Self-Improver | `tools/brain/self_improver.py` | 372 | ✅ Implemented |
+
+---
+
+## 🔴 The Problem
+
+The brain tools are **standalone CLI scripts** that must be called explicitly. They do NOT:
+- Auto-run when agent starts a session
+- Monitor chat in real-time
+- Intercept agent actions
+- Auto-trigger learning after tasks
+
+**Current reality:**
+```
+User Chat → Agent → Executes Task
+                  ↓
+          (Brain tools NOT called)
+```
+
+**Expected:**
+```
+User Chat → Agent → Brain Observer watches
+                  → Agent Executes Task
+                  → Judge scores result
+                  → Learner records patterns
+                  → Self-Improver updates rules
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🟢 Solution Options
+
+### Option 1: IDE Integration (Best but Hard)
+**How:** IDE hooks call brain tools before/after each agent action.
+- **Cursor:** Custom MCP server
+- **Windsurf:** Cascade plugin
+- **Antigravity:** Extension hooks
+
+**Pros:** Fully automatic, no agent changes needed
+**Cons:** Requires IDE-specific development
+
+---
+
+### Option 2: Agent Protocol (Recommended)
+**How:** Add mandatory steps to GEMINI.md that agents MUST follow:
+
+```markdown
+## Brain Protocol (MANDATORY)
+
+Before EVERY task:
+1. Check observer status: `python tools/brain/observer.py --status`
+2. Get model recommendation: `python tools/brain/model_optimizer.py --recommend "[task]"`
+
+After EVERY task:
+1. Score result: `python tools/brain/judge.py --score "[artifact]"`
+2. Trigger learning: `python tools/brain/learner.py --learn "[description]"`
+3. Record A/B if applicable
+```
+
+**Pros:** Works now, no IDE changes
+**Cons:** Relies on agent compliance
+
+---
+
+### Option 3: Batch/Scheduled (Easiest)
+**How:** Run brain analysis periodically, not per-task.
+
+```bash
+# Daily brain sync (add to workflow)
+python tools/brain/observer.py --watch
+python tools/brain/self_improver.py --analyze
+python tools/brain/self_improver.py --plan
+```
+
+**Pros:** Simple, low overhead
+**Cons:** Not real-time
+
+---
+
+## 📋 Recommendation: Option 2 + Option 3
+
+1. **Update GEMINI.md** with mandatory brain protocol
+2. **Add brain check to `/onboarding`**
+3. **Add brain sync to `/housekeeping`**
+4. **Future:** Build MCP server for full integration
+
+---
+
+## ❓ Questions for User
+
+1. Implement Option 2 (add brain protocol to GEMINI.md)?
+2. Add brain hooks to existing workflows?
+3. Build MCP server for Cursor/Windsurf (future)?

package/docs/reports/2026-01-05-repository-audit.md

@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+# 🔍 Repository Audit Report
+
+**Date:** 2026-01-05  
+**Version:** 1.6.0
+
+---
+
+## 📊 Architecture Diagram
+
+```mermaid
+graph TB
+    subgraph "🧠 Layer 1: ROOT (Brain)"
+        BRAIN[Brain Controller]
+        OBS[Observer]
+        JUD[Judge]
+        LEARN[Learner]
+        AB[A/B Tester]
+        OPT[Model Optimizer]
+        SELF[Self-Improver]
+    end
+
+    subgraph "🔄 Layer 2: WORKFLOWS (15)"
+        direction LR
+        W1[/brain]
+        W2[/cycle]
+        W3[/orchestrator]
+        W4[/emergency]
+        W5[/explore]
+        W6[/sprint]
+        W7[/release]
+        W8[/metrics]
+        W9[/validate]
+        W10[/housekeeping]
+        W11[/review]
+        W12[/debug]
+        W13[/refactor]
+        W14[/onboarding]
+        W15[/docs]
+    end
+
+    subgraph "👥 Layer 3: SKILLS (13)"
+        direction LR
+        PM[@PM]
+        BA[@BA]
+        SA[@SA]
+        DEV[@DEV]
+        TESTER[@TESTER]
+        SECA[@SECA]
+        DEVOPS[@DEVOPS]
+        UIUX[@UIUX]
+        PO[@PO]
+        REP[@REPORTER]
+        STAKE[@STAKEHOLDER]
+        ORCH[@ORCHESTRATOR]
+        BRAINR[@BRAIN]
+    end
+
+    subgraph "🛠️ TOOLS"
+        direction TB
+        T_BRAIN[tools/brain/]
+        T_KB[tools/kb/]
+        T_NEO[tools/neo4j/]
+        T_WORK[tools/workflows/]
+        T_RES[tools/research/]
+        T_REL[tools/release/]
+        T_VAL[tools/validation/]
+    end
+
+    subgraph "📦 STORAGE"
+        KB[.agent/knowledge-base/]
+        DOCS[docs/]
+        NEO4J[(Neo4j)]
+    end
+
+    BRAIN --> OBS & JUD & LEARN & AB & OPT & SELF
+    W1 --> T_BRAIN
+    W2 & W4 & W6 --> T_WORK
+    W8 --> T_KB
+    T_NEO --> NEO4J
+    T_KB --> KB
+    DEV & SA --> DOCS
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📦 Component Inventory
+
+### Workflows (15) ✅
+| Workflow | Type | Script Exists |
+|----------|------|---------------|
+| /brain | Support | ✅ brain_cli.py |
+| /cycle | Process | ✅ cycle.py |
+| /orchestrator | Process | ❌ **Missing** |
+| /emergency | Process | ✅ emergency.py |
+| /explore | Process | ❌ **Missing** |
+| /sprint | Process | ✅ sprint.py |
+| /release | Support | ✅ release.py |
+| /metrics | Utility | ✅ metrics-dashboard.py |
+| /validate | Utility | ✅ validate.py |
+| /housekeeping | Support | ✅ housekeeping.py |
+| /review | Process | ❌ **Missing** |
+| /debug | Process | ❌ **Missing** |
+| /refactor | Process | ❌ **Missing** |
+| /onboarding | Support | ❌ **Missing** |
+| /docs | Support | ❌ **Missing** |
+
+### Skills (13) ✅
+| Role | File Size | Status |
+|------|-----------|--------|
+| @PM | 8.6KB | ✅ Complete |
+| @BA | 3.2KB | ⚠️ Minimal |
+| @SA | 8.2KB | ✅ Complete |
+| @DEV | 10KB | ✅ Complete |
+| @TESTER | 8.6KB | ✅ Complete |
+| @SECA | 8.8KB | ✅ Complete |
+| @DEVOPS | 3.9KB | ⚠️ Minimal |
+| @UIUX | 7.6KB | ✅ Complete |
+| @PO | 6.4KB | ✅ Complete |
+| @REPORTER | 3.1KB | ⚠️ Minimal |
+| @STAKEHOLDER | 2.9KB | ⚠️ Minimal |
+| @ORCHESTRATOR | 6.5KB | ✅ Complete |
+| @BRAIN | 16KB | ✅ Complete |
+
+### Tools (28 Python Scripts)
+| Directory | Scripts | Purpose |
+|-----------|---------|---------|
+| tools/brain/ | 8 | Brain components |
+| tools/kb/ | 6 | KB management |
+| tools/neo4j/ | 9 | Neo4j integration |
+| tools/workflows/ | 5 | Workflow automation |
+| tools/research/ | 4 | Research agent |
+| tools/release/ | 3 | Release management |
+| tools/validation/ | 3 | Validation |
+
+### Tests (10)
+| Test File | Coverage |
+|-----------|----------|
+| test_brain_components.py | Brain tools |
+| test_learning_engine.py | Learning engine |
+| test_document_sync.py | Doc sync |
+| test_emergency.py | Emergency workflow |
+| test_kb_tools.py | KB tools |
+| test_release.py | Release |
+| test_agent_manage.py | Agent management |
+| test_cli_js.py | CLI |
+| test_common.py | Common utils |
+
+### CLI Commands (8)
+| Command | Script | Status |
+|---------|--------|--------|
+| release | release.py | ✅ |
+| kb | kb_cli.py | ✅ |
+| agent | run.py | ✅ |
+| validate | validate.py | ✅ |
+| health | health-check.py | ✅ |
+| setup | init.py | ✅ |
+| brain | brain_cli.py | ✅ |
+| research | research_agent.py | ✅ |
+
+---
+
+## 🔴 MISSING Features & Scripts (P0)
+
+| # | Missing | Location | Impact |
+|---|---------|----------|--------|
+| 1 | `orchestrator.py` | tools/workflows/ | Full SDLC automation broken |
+| 2 | `explore.py` | tools/workflows/ | Deep investigation unavailable |
+| 3 | `review.py` | tools/workflows/ | Code review workflow manual |
+| 4 | `debug.py` | tools/workflows/ | Debug workflow manual |
+| 5 | `refactor.py` | tools/workflows/ | Refactor workflow manual |
+| 6 | `onboarding.py` | tools/workflows/ | Onboarding manual |
+| 7 | `docs.py` | tools/workflows/ | Docs workflow manual |
+| 8 | `learn` CLI cmd | bin/cli.js | Learning engine not in CLI |
+
+---
+
+## 🟠 GAPS Identified (P1)
+
+| # | Gap | Current State | Needed |
+|---|-----|---------------|--------|
+| 1 | No `/learn` CLI | Must use python directly | Add to cli.js |
+| 2 | No artifact sync cmd | Manual copy | `agentic-sdlc artifact` |
+| 3 | Minimal @BA role | 3KB only | Expand like @PM |
+| 4 | Minimal @DEVOPS | 3.9KB | Expand with CI/CD |
+| 5 | No GitHub Actions | .github/ exists | Add CI workflow |
+| 6 | No solution sync | Solutions folder new | Add to document_sync |
+
+---
+
+## 🟡 Improvements Recommended (P2)
+
+| # | Improvement | Benefit |
+|---|-------------|---------|
+| 1 | Add `workflow` to CLI | `agentic-sdlc workflow cycle` works but missing in commands |
+| 2 | Expand test coverage | Current: 10 tests, need more integration |
+| 3 | Add `metrics` CLI cmd | Quick project stats |
+| 4 | Role cross-references | Link roles to workflows |
+| 5 | Template validation | Check templates exist |
+| 6 | KB auto-categorize | Auto-tag entries |
+| 7 | Solution template | Standardize solutions |
+| 8 | Brain dashboard | Visualize brain state |
+
+---
+
+## 📈 Statistics Summary
+
+| Category | Count |
+|----------|-------|
+| Workflows | 15 |
+| Skills/Roles | 13 |
+| Tools (Python) | 28 |
+| CLI Commands | 8 |
+| Tests | 10 |
+| Templates | 17 |
+| KB Entries | ~28 |
+| Docs | 91 |
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Priority Actions
+
+### P0 - Critical (Missing Core Scripts)
+```bash
+# Create these workflow scripts:
+tools/workflows/orchestrator.py
+tools/workflows/explore.py
+tools/workflows/review.py
+tools/workflows/debug.py
+tools/workflows/refactor.py
+tools/workflows/onboarding.py
+tools/workflows/docs.py
+```
+
+### P1 - Important (CLI Gaps)
+```javascript
+// Add to bin/cli.js commands:
+'learn': 'tools/neo4j/learning_engine.py',
+'metrics': 'tools/kb/metrics-dashboard.py',
+'artifact': 'tools/kb/artifact_sync.py'  // NEW
+```
+
+### P2 - Nice to Have
+- Expand minimal roles (@BA, @DEVOPS, @REPORTER)
+- Add GitHub Actions CI
+- Brain visualization dashboard
+
+---
+
+## ❓ Questions for User
+
+1. **Priority:** Should I create missing P0 workflow scripts first?
+2. **Scope:** Expand minimal roles now or later?
+3. **CI/CD:** Add GitHub Actions workflow?

package/docs/reports/Metrics-Dashboard-2026-01-08.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# 📊 Metrics Dashboard
+
+**Generated:** 2026-01-08 20:58  
+**Overall Health:** 🟢 Excellent
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Total KB Entries | 15 |
+| This Week | +3 |
+| This Month | +8 |
+| Total Time Saved | 32 hours |
+| Avg Time per Entry | 2.1 hours |
+
+---
+
+## 📈 Learning Velocity
+
+✅ **Strong learning velocity** - Team is actively documenting solutions
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Recommendations
+
+- ✅ Keep up the great work!
+- 💡 Consider documenting more architecture decisions

package/docs/reports/Metrics-Dashboard-Final.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# 📊 Metrics Dashboard
+
+**Generated:** 2026-01-08 10:58  
+**Overall Health:** 🟢 Excellent
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Total KB Entries | 15 |
+| This Week | +3 |
+| This Month | +8 |
+| Total Time Saved | 32 hours |
+| Avg Time per Entry | 2.1 hours |
+
+---
+
+## 📈 Learning Velocity
+
+✅ **Strong learning velocity** - Team is actively documenting solutions
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Recommendations
+
+- ✅ Keep up the great work!
+- 💡 Consider documenting more architecture decisions

package/docs/reports/Validation-Report-2026-01-05.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+---
+category: report
+tags: [validation, health-check, workflow-audit]
+date: 2026-01-05
+author: @VALIDATOR
+status: automated
+related: [validate.md](../../.agent/workflows/validate.md)
+---
+
+# Validation Report: 2026-01-05
+
+## Problem/Challenge
+Need to ensure integrity of workflow tool references and file paths to prevent runtime errors.
+
+## Solution/Implementation
+Executed automated validation scan on **14 workflow files**.
+
+### Scan Results
+```yaml
+Workflows Scanned: 14
+Total References:  31
+Valid References:  31
+Broken References: 0
+Generated At:      10:39
+```
+
+## Artifacts/Output
+
+- **Health Score:** 100/100
+- **Status:** ✅ PASS
+
+✅ **All Clear:** No issues found. All tool references are valid.
+
+## Next Steps/Actions
+
+1. Fix any broken references immediately
+2. Replace hardcoded paths with relative paths
+3. Run validation again to verify fixes
+
+#validation #health-check #workflow-audit

package/docs/reports/Validation-Report-2026-01-08.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+---
+category: report
+tags: [validation, health-check, workflow-audit]
+date: 2026-01-08
+author: @VALIDATOR
+status: automated
+related: [validate.md](../../.agent/workflows/validate.md)
+---
+
+# Validation Report: 2026-01-08
+
+## Problem/Challenge
+Need to ensure integrity of workflow tool references and file paths to prevent runtime errors.
+
+## Solution/Implementation
+Executed automated validation scan on **22 workflow files**.
+
+### Scan Results
+```yaml
+Workflows Scanned: 22
+Total References:  86
+Valid References:  86
+Broken References: 0
+Generated At:      20:50
+```
+
+## Artifacts/Output
+
+- **Health Score:** 100/100
+- **Status:** ✅ PASS
+
+✅ **All Clear:** No issues found. All tool references are valid.
+
+## Next Steps/Actions
+
+1. Fix any broken references immediately
+2. Replace hardcoded paths with relative paths
+3. Run validation again to verify fixes
+
+#validation #health-check #workflow-audit

package/docs/reports/worktrunk-audit.md

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+# Exploration Report: Worktrunk Audit
+
+**Date:** 2026-01-06  
+**Author:** @SA (Agentic SDLC)
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+Worktrunk is a Rust-based CLI tool that simplifies `git worktree` management, specifically designed for parallel AI agent workflows. It allows running 5-10+ AI agents (like Claude Code) simultaneously, each in its own isolated worktree. **Highly recommended for adoption** given the user's agentic SDLC context.
+
+## First-Order Analysis
+
+### Core Value Proposition
+| Feature | Description |
+|---------|-------------|
+| **Simplified Commands** | `wt switch`, `wt list`, `wt merge`, `wt remove` |
+| **Context Isolation** | Each agent gets its own working directory |
+| **Workflow Automation** | Hooks for on-create, pre-merge, post-merge |
+| **LLM Integration** | Auto-generate commit messages from diffs |
+
+### Immediate Benefits
+- **Instant context switching** without stashing/committing
+- **Parallel execution**: Run multiple agents on different features
+- **Clean state**: Each task has isolated file system state
+
+## Second-Order Analysis
+
+### Installation
+
+| Method | Command |
+|--------|---------|
+| **Cargo** | `cargo install worktrunk && wt config shell install` |
+| **Homebrew** | `brew install max-sixty/worktrunk/wt && wt config shell install` |
+
+**Prerequisites:** Git, Rust (for Cargo install)
+
+### Integration Points
+- Can integrate with `.agent/workflows` for environment setup
+- Hook system allows running setup scripts on worktree creation
+- Claude Code integration documented at [worktrunk.dev](https://worktrunk.dev)
+
+## Third-Order Analysis
+
+### Performance & Resources
+| Aspect | Impact |
+|--------|--------|
+| **Disk usage** | Moderate increase (shared git objects) |
+| **Checkout time** | Initial worktree creation ~1-3s |
+| **Switch time** | Instantaneous (just `cd`) |
+
+### Maintenance
+- Active project: 41 releases, 7 contributors
+- Good documentation at [worktrunk.dev](https://worktrunk.dev)
+
+## Fourth-Order Analysis
+
+### Windows Compatibility ✅
+Worktrunk has **explicit Windows support**:
+- Git Bash support with POSIX path conversion
+- PowerShell fallback for basic commands
+- Handles Windows verbatim paths (`\\?\`)
+- Fixes path canonicalization issues
+
+### Potential Risks
+| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
+|------|-------------|--------|------------|
+| Rust/Cargo not installed | Medium | High | Document install prerequisites |
+| IDE worktree support | Low | Medium | Each worktree = separate VSCode window |
+| Submodules complexity | Low | Low | Run `git submodule update --init` per worktree |
+
+## Recommendation
+
+> [!TIP]
+> **ADOPT** - Worktrunk is a strong fit for the Agentic SDLC project.
+
+### Why Adopt
+1. **Perfect fit**: Designed for parallel AI agent workflows
+2. **Windows ready**: Explicit support for the user's OS
+3. **Active maintenance**: Frequent releases and good docs
+4. **Claude integration**: Built-in support for Claude Code
+
+### Suggested Next Steps
+1. Install via Cargo: `cargo install worktrunk`
+2. Configure shell: `wt config shell install`
+3. Create a `/worktree` workflow in `.agent/workflows/`
+4. Document usage in role-dev.md
+
+## Open Questions
+- [x] Installation method? → Cargo or Homebrew
+- [x] Windows compatibility? → Yes, with Git Bash
+
+## References
+- [GitHub: max-sixty/worktrunk](https://github.com/max-sixty/worktrunk)
+- [Documentation: worktrunk.dev](https://worktrunk.dev)
+- [Anthropic: Claude Code Best Practices](https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/claude-code-best-practices)