agentic-scorecard 0.3.1 → 0.4.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (31) hide show
  1. package/AGENT_PROMPT.md +11 -11
  2. package/README.md +35 -29
  3. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapter-contract.md +129 -0
  4. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-agent-harnesses.yaml +266 -0
  5. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-ci-providers.yaml +57 -0
  6. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-command-wrappers.yaml +37 -0
  7. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-environment-tooling.yaml +17 -0
  8. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-github-conventions.yaml +27 -0
  9. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-python-tooling.yaml +15 -0
  10. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-security-tools.yaml +45 -0
  11. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-verification-tools.yaml +65 -0
  12. package/benchmark/v0.4/agent-evidence-schema.json +74 -0
  13. package/benchmark/v0.4/attestation-schema.json +35 -0
  14. package/benchmark/v0.4/benchmark.yaml +127 -0
  15. package/benchmark/v0.4/calibration-matrix.md +60 -0
  16. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/context.yaml +75 -0
  17. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/environment.yaml +93 -0
  18. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/governance.yaml +132 -0
  19. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/learning.yaml +78 -0
  20. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/observability.yaml +91 -0
  21. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/resilience.yaml +170 -0
  22. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/security.yaml +143 -0
  23. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/specification.yaml +65 -0
  24. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/testing.yaml +82 -0
  25. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/tooling.yaml +69 -0
  26. package/benchmark/v0.4/report-schema.json +89 -0
  27. package/benchmark/v0.4/scoring-policy.md +175 -0
  28. package/dist/cli.js +2287 -162
  29. package/package.json +3 -2
  30. package/templates/agent-evidence.yaml +2 -2
  31. package/templates/attestations.yaml +3 -1
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
1
+ dimension: security
2
+ controls:
3
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-001
4
+ level: 1
5
+ title: Agent secret and sensitive-data boundaries are documented
6
+ outcome: Contributors can find agent-specific rules for credentials, secrets, and sensitive data.
7
+ risk: Agents expose credentials or sensitive data while planning, changing, or reporting work.
8
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
9
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
10
+ evidence:
11
+ - type: content_terms
12
+ scope: repository
13
+ files:
14
+ [
15
+ SECURITY.md,
16
+ AGENTS.md,
17
+ Agents.md,
18
+ agents.md,
19
+ .ai/AGENTS.md,
20
+ .ai/Agents.md,
21
+ .ai/constitution.md,
22
+ .ai/instructions/**/*.md,
23
+ .ai/rules/**/*.md,
24
+ .ai/skills/**/*.md,
25
+ .agents/**/*.md,
26
+ docs/security/**,
27
+ docs/agentic/**,
28
+ ]
29
+ terms: [secret, secrets, credential, credentials, sensitive data, personal data, PII]
30
+ min_terms: 2
31
+ max_span_lines: 80
32
+ max_files_per_pattern: 50
33
+ remediation: Document agent-specific rules for secrets, credentials, sensitive data, logs, prompts, and generated artifacts.
34
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-002
35
+ level: 2
36
+ title: Agent data and autonomy boundaries are explicit
37
+ outcome: Agent preflight guidance binds permitted data, tools, mutations, approvals, and stop conditions.
38
+ risk: Operators grant more data or authority than the task requires.
39
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
40
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
41
+ evidence:
42
+ - type: content_terms
43
+ scope: repository
44
+ files:
45
+ [
46
+ SECURITY.md,
47
+ AGENTS.md,
48
+ Agents.md,
49
+ agents.md,
50
+ .ai/AGENTS.md,
51
+ .ai/Agents.md,
52
+ .ai/constitution.md,
53
+ .ai/instructions/**/*.md,
54
+ .ai/rules/**/*.md,
55
+ .ai/skills/**/*.md,
56
+ .agents/**/*.md,
57
+ docs/security/**,
58
+ docs/agentic/**,
59
+ templates/**,
60
+ ]
61
+ terms:
62
+ [
63
+ data classification,
64
+ allowed tools,
65
+ mutation,
66
+ budget,
67
+ human approval,
68
+ autonomy,
69
+ stop condition,
70
+ ]
71
+ min_terms: 3
72
+ max_span_lines: 120
73
+ max_files_per_pattern: 50
74
+ remediation: Add a task preflight that binds data, tools, write scope, budget, approvals, and stop conditions.
75
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-006
76
+ level: 2
77
+ title: Security reporting and response are documented
78
+ outcome: Contributors can find a vulnerability-reporting or security-escalation path.
79
+ risk: Security concerns discovered during agent work lack an accountable response path.
80
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
81
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
82
+ evidence:
83
+ - type: content_terms
84
+ scope: repository
85
+ files: [SECURITY.md, docs/security/**, docs/contributing/**]
86
+ terms: [report, vulnerability, security contact, escalation, incident]
87
+ min_terms: 2
88
+ max_span_lines: 80
89
+ remediation: Publish a vulnerability-reporting and security-escalation path with response ownership.
90
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-003
91
+ level: 3
92
+ title: Automated secret-leakage safeguards are enforced
93
+ outcome: Repository or platform automation scans relevant changes for secrets before integration.
94
+ risk: Credentials can enter version history because secret safeguards are absent or merely documented.
95
+ allow_attestation: true
96
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
97
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository, platform]
98
+ evidence_mode: any
99
+ evidence:
100
+ - type: ci_command
101
+ scope: repository
102
+ min_tools: 1
103
+ - type: manual
104
+ scope: platform
105
+ prompt: Show that host-native secret scanning or push protection covers the assessed repository and relevant branches, including current status and controlled exceptions.
106
+ remediation: Run a secret-leakage safeguard in applicable CI or enable equivalent protected platform scanning with reviewable evidence.
107
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-007
108
+ level: 3
109
+ title: Untrusted agent-input safeguards are enforced
110
+ outcome: The harness bounds untrusted content and prompt-borne instructions with enforced isolation, validation, or tested handling.
111
+ risk: Repository, issue, tool, or retrieved content can redirect an agent beyond the authorized task and authority.
112
+ allow_attestation: true
113
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
114
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository, platform, organization]
115
+ evidence:
116
+ - type: manual
117
+ scope: organization
118
+ prompt: Show the untrusted-input boundaries and recent mechanical tests or enforcement evidence for prompt injection, sandbox escape, or unauthorized tool instructions.
119
+ remediation: Define untrusted-input boundaries and enforce them with sandboxing, validation, allowlists, or adversarial tests appropriate to the harness.
120
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-005
121
+ level: 3
122
+ title: High-impact agent actions are technically gated
123
+ outcome: External authority controls prevent unapproved high-impact actions and record controlled exceptions.
124
+ risk: Repository instructions alone cannot prevent credential misuse or irreversible external actions.
125
+ allow_attestation: true
126
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
127
+ evidence:
128
+ - type: manual
129
+ scope: platform
130
+ prompt: Show authorization gates, scoped credentials, approval enforcement, audit records, and controlled bypasses for high-impact agent actions.
131
+ remediation: Enforce least-privileged credentials, approval gates, auditability, and restricted exception handling.
132
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-004
133
+ level: 4
134
+ title: Agent security outcomes drive improvement
135
+ outcome: Denials, near misses, incidents, exceptions, and adversarial exercises are trended and improve controls.
136
+ risk: Controls appear complete while effectiveness against real failure modes remains unknown.
137
+ allow_attestation: true
138
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
139
+ evidence:
140
+ - type: manual
141
+ scope: outcome
142
+ prompt: Provide agent-security outcome trends or exercise results and a recent control change driven by them.
143
+ remediation: Run adversarial exercises, trend security outcomes, and update boundaries from the results.
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
1
+ dimension: specification
2
+ controls:
3
+ - id: ADRB-SPC-001
4
+ level: 1
5
+ title: Work has a durable objective
6
+ outcome: Engineering work starts from a tracked issue, request, or specification artifact.
7
+ risk: Agents optimize an inferred problem and completion cannot be judged consistently.
8
+ evidence:
9
+ - type: path_any
10
+ scope: repository
11
+ patterns: [docs/requirements/**, docs/spec*.md, docs/specs/**, specs/**, .ai/specs/**]
12
+ remediation: Adopt a tracked work-request or specification template with objective, owner, and outcome.
13
+ - id: ADRB-SPC-002
14
+ level: 2
15
+ title: Acceptance criteria and constraints are documented
16
+ outcome: Work artifacts state testable acceptance criteria plus material constraints or exclusions.
17
+ risk: An implementation can appear plausible without satisfying a shared definition of done.
18
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
19
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
20
+ evidence:
21
+ - type: content_terms
22
+ scope: repository
23
+ files: [docs/requirements/**, docs/spec*.md, docs/specs/**, specs/**, .ai/specs/**]
24
+ terms: [acceptance criteria, requirements, constraints, non-goals, verification]
25
+ min_terms: 2
26
+ max_span_lines: 160
27
+ remediation: Add testable outcomes, constraints, exclusions, and verification expectations to work artifacts.
28
+ - id: ADRB-SPC-003
29
+ level: 3
30
+ title: Specification traceability is mechanically checked
31
+ outcome: Automation checks that applicable changes and verification trace to an approved work artifact.
32
+ risk: Specifications become optional prose disconnected from implementation and tests.
33
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
34
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
35
+ evidence:
36
+ - type: ci_command
37
+ scope: repository
38
+ providers: []
39
+ tools: []
40
+ min_tools: 1
41
+ remediation: Add a deterministic traceability check from change to work artifact and verification record.
42
+ - id: ADRB-SPC-005
43
+ level: 3
44
+ title: Specification traceability is required before merge
45
+ outcome: Repository merge policy requires the applicable traceability check or equivalent review evidence.
46
+ risk: A configured check can be skipped or bypassed when delivery pressure rises.
47
+ allow_attestation: true
48
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
49
+ evidence:
50
+ - type: manual
51
+ scope: platform
52
+ prompt: Show that the traceability check or equivalent review requirement is an enforced merge gate with controlled exceptions.
53
+ remediation: Require the traceability check in merge policy and restrict, record, and review bypasses.
54
+ - id: ADRB-SPC-004
55
+ level: 4
56
+ title: Specification effectiveness drives improvement
57
+ outcome: Rework and escaped ambiguity attributable to specifications are trended and improve the process.
58
+ risk: Specification ceremony grows without reducing misunderstanding or rework.
59
+ allow_attestation: true
60
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
61
+ evidence:
62
+ - type: manual
63
+ scope: outcome
64
+ prompt: Provide specification-related rework or ambiguity trends and a recent process change driven by them.
65
+ remediation: Classify rework causes and evolve specification practices using outcome evidence.
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
1
+ dimension: testing
2
+ controls:
3
+ - id: ADRB-TST-001
4
+ level: 1
5
+ title: Automated tests exist
6
+ outcome: The tracked repository contains executable tests for at least one important behavior.
7
+ risk: Agent changes rely on plausibility or manual inspection alone.
8
+ evidence:
9
+ - type: path_any
10
+ scope: repository
11
+ patterns: ['**/*.test.*', '**/*.spec.*', tests/**, test/**]
12
+ remediation: Add a fast automated test for a critical behavior and document how to run it.
13
+ - id: ADRB-TST-002
14
+ level: 2
15
+ title: Verification layers and canonical commands are documented
16
+ outcome: Contributors can identify applicable test layers and the canonical verification path.
17
+ risk: Agents run a convenient subset and overstate confidence in the result.
18
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
19
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
20
+ evidence:
21
+ - type: content_terms
22
+ scope: repository
23
+ files:
24
+ [
25
+ README.md,
26
+ CONTRIBUTING.md,
27
+ AGENTS.md,
28
+ Agents.md,
29
+ agents.md,
30
+ .ai/AGENTS.md,
31
+ .ai/Agents.md,
32
+ .ai/constitution.md,
33
+ .ai/instructions/**/*.md,
34
+ .ai/rules/**/*.md,
35
+ .ai/skills/**/*.md,
36
+ .agents/**/*.md,
37
+ docs/testing/**,
38
+ package.json,
39
+ Makefile,
40
+ ]
41
+ terms: [unit test, integration test, end-to-end, e2e, typecheck, lint, test]
42
+ min_terms: 2
43
+ required_any_terms: [verify, verification, test, check, CI]
44
+ max_span_lines: 120
45
+ max_files_per_pattern: 50
46
+ remediation: Define the test taxonomy and one canonical command that matches CI.
47
+ - id: ADRB-TST-003
48
+ level: 3
49
+ title: CI executes the required verification layers
50
+ outcome: Repository automation runs appropriate tests and static checks from a clean state.
51
+ risk: Documented verification can be omitted from automation or run in an unrepresentative environment.
52
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
53
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
54
+ evidence:
55
+ - type: ci_command
56
+ scope: repository
57
+ min_tools: 2
58
+ remediation: Configure CI to run the applicable verification layers from a clean environment.
59
+ - id: ADRB-TST-005
60
+ level: 3
61
+ title: Verification is enforced before merge
62
+ outcome: Merge policy requires the applicable CI checks and restricts bypasses.
63
+ risk: Healthy CI configuration remains optional under delivery pressure.
64
+ allow_attestation: true
65
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
66
+ evidence:
67
+ - type: manual
68
+ scope: platform
69
+ prompt: Show required status checks or equivalent merge gates, covered branches, bypass actors, and exception controls.
70
+ remediation: Make appropriate CI checks required merge gates and restrict, record, and review bypasses.
71
+ - id: ADRB-TST-004
72
+ level: 4
73
+ title: Verification effectiveness drives improvement
74
+ outcome: Escaped defects, flakiness, and other signal-quality outcomes are trended and improve testing.
75
+ risk: Test count and coverage rise while meaningful defects still escape.
76
+ allow_attestation: true
77
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
78
+ evidence:
79
+ - type: manual
80
+ scope: outcome
81
+ prompt: Provide verification outcome trends by task class and a recent test-strategy improvement driven by them.
82
+ remediation: Trend escaped defects and signal quality, then invest in the weakest verification layers.
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
1
+ dimension: tooling
2
+ controls:
3
+ - id: ADRB-TOL-001
4
+ level: 1
5
+ title: Supported agent tools are declared
6
+ outcome: The tracked repository identifies supported agent interfaces or tool configuration.
7
+ risk: Agents discover tools opportunistically and use unsupported or unsafe paths.
8
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
9
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
10
+ evidence:
11
+ - type: path_any
12
+ scope: repository
13
+ patterns: [.ai/agentic.config.*, .ai/skills/**, .agents/**, mcp.json, .mcp.json]
14
+ remediation: Commit a non-empty declaration of supported agent surfaces and their intended use.
15
+ - id: ADRB-TOL-002
16
+ level: 2
17
+ title: Tool scope and failure behavior are documented
18
+ outcome: Tool guidance defines authority, validation, success signals, failure handling, and approved fallback.
19
+ risk: Agents bypass failures, widen scope, or mistake partial results for success.
20
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
21
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
22
+ evidence:
23
+ - type: content_terms
24
+ scope: repository
25
+ files:
26
+ [
27
+ AGENTS.md,
28
+ Agents.md,
29
+ agents.md,
30
+ .ai/AGENTS.md,
31
+ .ai/Agents.md,
32
+ .ai/agentic*.md,
33
+ .ai/instructions/**/*.md,
34
+ .ai/rules/**/*.md,
35
+ .ai/skills/**/*.md,
36
+ .agents/**/*.md,
37
+ docs/agentic/**,
38
+ docs/tools/**,
39
+ ]
40
+ terms: [authority, permission, read-only, validation, failure, fallback, approval]
41
+ min_terms: 3
42
+ required_any_terms: [tool, MCP, connector, skill, command, agent]
43
+ max_span_lines: 120
44
+ max_files_per_pattern: 50
45
+ remediation: Document each high-impact tool's authority, inputs, validation, failure mode, and fallback.
46
+ - id: ADRB-TOL-003
47
+ level: 3
48
+ title: High-impact tool authority is technically bounded and audited
49
+ outcome: High-impact tools enforce least privilege, authorization, structured validation, and audit records.
50
+ risk: Prompt instructions become the only barrier between an agent and an irreversible action.
51
+ allow_attestation: true
52
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
53
+ evidence:
54
+ - type: manual
55
+ scope: platform
56
+ prompt: Show technical least-privilege enforcement, authorization tests, validation, audit records, and fail-closed behavior for high-impact tools.
57
+ remediation: Enforce scoped credentials, authorization, schema validation, audit logging, and deny-by-default behavior.
58
+ - id: ADRB-TOL-004
59
+ level: 4
60
+ title: Tool reliability drives improvement
61
+ outcome: Tool success, partial failure, denial, latency, and unsafe-fallback attempts are trended and improved.
62
+ risk: Tooling quality and risky workarounds remain anecdotal until an incident occurs.
63
+ allow_attestation: true
64
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
65
+ evidence:
66
+ - type: manual
67
+ scope: outcome
68
+ prompt: Provide tool reliability trends and a recent tool or fallback improvement driven by them.
69
+ remediation: Trend tool outcomes by task and risk class and improve weak or bypassed interfaces.
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
1
+ {
2
+ "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3
+ "$id": "https://agentic-readiness.dev/schema/v0.4/report.json",
4
+ "title": "ADRB v0.4 assessment report",
5
+ "type": "object",
6
+ "required": [
7
+ "schema_version",
8
+ "benchmark",
9
+ "target",
10
+ "assessed_at",
11
+ "warnings",
12
+ "score",
13
+ "evidence_summary",
14
+ "dimensions",
15
+ "controls",
16
+ "profiles",
17
+ "readiness",
18
+ "limitations"
19
+ ],
20
+ "properties": {
21
+ "schema_version": { "const": "0.4.0" },
22
+ "benchmark": {
23
+ "type": "object",
24
+ "required": ["id", "version"],
25
+ "properties": { "version": { "const": "0.4.0" } }
26
+ },
27
+ "target": {
28
+ "type": "object",
29
+ "required": [
30
+ "repository",
31
+ "profile",
32
+ "scope",
33
+ "git_head",
34
+ "git_remote",
35
+ "working_tree_dirty"
36
+ ],
37
+ "properties": { "scope": { "enum": ["tracked", "workspace"] } }
38
+ },
39
+ "assessed_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
40
+ "warnings": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
41
+ "score": {
42
+ "type": "object",
43
+ "additionalProperties": false,
44
+ "required": ["total", "maximum", "percentage", "repository"],
45
+ "properties": {
46
+ "total": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 40 },
47
+ "maximum": { "const": 40 },
48
+ "percentage": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 100 },
49
+ "repository": {
50
+ "type": "object",
51
+ "additionalProperties": false,
52
+ "required": ["achieved", "ceiling", "percentage"],
53
+ "properties": {
54
+ "achieved": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 40 },
55
+ "ceiling": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 40 },
56
+ "percentage": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 100 }
57
+ }
58
+ }
59
+ }
60
+ },
61
+ "evidence_summary": {
62
+ "type": "object",
63
+ "additionalProperties": false,
64
+ "required": [
65
+ "repository_detected",
66
+ "agent_collected",
67
+ "attested",
68
+ "unmet",
69
+ "unknown",
70
+ "resolved",
71
+ "total"
72
+ ],
73
+ "properties": {
74
+ "repository_detected": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
75
+ "agent_collected": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
76
+ "attested": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
77
+ "unmet": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
78
+ "unknown": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
79
+ "resolved": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
80
+ "total": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 }
81
+ }
82
+ },
83
+ "dimensions": { "type": "array", "minItems": 10, "maxItems": 10 },
84
+ "controls": { "type": "array" },
85
+ "profiles": { "type": "array" },
86
+ "readiness": { "type": "object" },
87
+ "limitations": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } }
88
+ }
89
+ }
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
1
+ # v0.4 scoring policy
2
+
3
+ This document is normative for benchmark version 0.4.0.
4
+
5
+ ## Unit and assessment scope
6
+
7
+ The unit is one repository plus explicitly supplied repository-semantic, external, and
8
+ organizational evidence bound to that repository. The default `tracked` mode considers only
9
+ Git-tracked paths, using their current working-tree contents. Reports record the commit, remote, and
10
+ dirty state. `workspace` mode is available for provisional assessment and is not directly
11
+ comparable with tracked-mode reports.
12
+
13
+ Generated reports, attestations, evidence requests, and imported evidence bundles never qualify as
14
+ repository evidence. An assessment must be idempotent: adding its own generated artifacts cannot
15
+ change its score.
16
+
17
+ ## Dimension scores
18
+
19
+ Each dimension earns level `n` only when every applicable control at that level and every lower
20
+ level is met. More than one control may exist at a level when separate observable outcomes are
21
+ required. Controls met above the first gap are reported but do not increase the dimension score.
22
+
23
+ The normative score is the sum of ten dimension scores, with a maximum of 40. Its percentage is
24
+ display-only and does not determine readiness.
25
+
26
+ ### Repository-detected progress
27
+
28
+ v0.4 also reports an explanatory repository score and ceiling. For each dimension, the ceiling is
29
+ the highest consecutive level for which every control has a deterministic, non-manual repository
30
+ collector. The achieved value is the highest consecutive level established only with
31
+ `repository-detected` evidence. The two values are summed across dimensions.
32
+
33
+ Agent-collected and human-attested evidence never increases repository-detected progress. The
34
+ repository percentage is `achieved / ceiling`; it does not replace the normative score, remove
35
+ UNKNOWN controls, or affect readiness-profile decisions.
36
+
37
+ ## Readiness decisions
38
+
39
+ Each autonomy profile defines a floor for every dimension. A profile passes only if every floor is
40
+ met. Strength in one dimension cannot compensate for a security, testing, governance, or recovery
41
+ gap elsewhere. No profile grants deployment or production authority.
42
+
43
+ When a passed target profile depends on agent-collected or human-attested controls, the report's
44
+ target-profile headline discloses the number of required controls from each provenance class.
45
+
46
+ ## Evidence scopes and provenance
47
+
48
+ - `repository-detected`: a deterministic collector found qualifying evidence in the selected path
49
+ scope. It proves the reported artifact match, not consistent human behavior or external
50
+ enforcement.
51
+ - `agent-collected`: an authorized agent supplied a structured, source-backed repository-semantic
52
+ or external claim. It may satisfy only explicitly eligible controls and is never independently
53
+ verified.
54
+ - `attested`: an accountable person supplied a dated, expiring claim and durable reference.
55
+ - `unknown`: evidence is unavailable, expired, mismatched, unauthorized, or inconclusive.
56
+
57
+ Repository controls use non-empty files, control-specific term thresholds, semantic component
58
+ groups, structurally identifiable non-placeholder ownership mappings, enabled integration-triggered
59
+ CI invocations with adapter-declared full action identities plus explicit refs or executable plus
60
+ required argument-group signatures and prohibited non-blocking modes, executable step/job structure,
61
+ auto-loaded provider entry points, supported complete conditions and inheritance, no unparsed path
62
+ or exclusion gates, and blocking foreground exit-status
63
+ propagation, bounded line windows, and per-pattern candidate limits. Partial evidence remains
64
+ visible but does not pass a control. An ownership artifact, explicit accountable-human approval
65
+ authority, and explicit accountable-human merge authority are independently required for
66
+ `ADRB-GOV-002`; a generic owner/reviewer mention or declared agent authority cannot establish either
67
+ human authority. Directly negated authority statements do not count as positive evidence whether
68
+ negation appears before or after the matched phrase, including a colon-delimited policy label, and
69
+ explicit mappings require a recognized repository-wide target or path/component target rather than
70
+ arbitrary or punctuation-only syntax.
71
+ Typed ownership-table scope columns may use substantive component names, while conventional
72
+ plain-text former-owner sections remain inactive. Restrictive phrases such as `must not exceed`
73
+ establish an upper bound and are not treated as absence of the control.
74
+ `ADRB-RES-002` requires resource budgets and retry bounds as independent co-located components;
75
+ neither substitutes for the other.
76
+ Mechanical Level 3 context, environment, specification, testing, and learning controls require
77
+ structurally recognized CI commands; comments, documentation, and command-name keywords do not
78
+ establish execution. `ADRB-ENV-003` requires a locked installation plus independent test and
79
+ static-analysis command classes in the same CI execution group; commands split across jobs or
80
+ workflow files do not prove that one clean environment performs canonical verification. GitHub
81
+ event conditions are part of that identity, so commands restricted to mutually exclusive
82
+ `pull_request` and `merge_group` executions do not combine.
83
+ `ADRB-TST-003`
84
+ requires independent test and static-analysis command classes aggregated across the assessed CI
85
+ entry points. Root package-manager tasks must
86
+ resolve to tracked script definitions whose command bodies establish the applicable command class,
87
+ including when supported wrappers or global package-manager options precede the invocation.
88
+ Context-changing package/workspace options require resolution of the selected manifest or fail
89
+ closed; nested package-exec tools may qualify only at a supported executable position.
90
+ Custom guidance validators additionally require adapter-declared validation structures in the
91
+ executed tracked source after language comments are excluded; file presence or comment text alone
92
+ does not establish behavior. Specification-traceability and knowledge-curation checks use the same
93
+ source-bound standard. A recognized specification validator binds an approved work-item reference
94
+ to both implementation and verification artifacts; checking only for a heading is insufficient.
95
+ Constant-false branches and validation functions without a top-level reachable call path fail closed.
96
+ Required structural groups cannot combine across unreachable function bodies. JavaScript/TypeScript
97
+ class methods, object shorthand methods, and object arrow methods fail closed when the conservative
98
+ collector cannot prove their invocation.
99
+ Tool-specific discovery or listing modes do not count as execution. In a supported fail-fast shell,
100
+ each multiline command may contribute because any failure gates the step; without fail-fast
101
+ semantics, only the final effective foreground command may establish execution.
102
+ Catalog pattern order is significant when a candidate limit is present: authoritative entry points
103
+ precede large run, skill, or documentation corpora. External platform, organization, and outcome
104
+ controls cannot be inferred from repository keywords.
105
+
106
+ Human attestations and agent evidence may satisfy only controls explicitly eligible for those
107
+ classes. A v0.4 control may permit an `agent-collected` repository claim when a legitimate tracked
108
+ artifact uses an unrecognized convention. This is a semantic alternative, not a deterministic
109
+ pass: it remains separately labelled and does not increase repository-detected progress. Human
110
+ attestations cannot override repository-artifact controls. `ADRB-SEC-003` permits a dated, expiring
111
+ human attestation only for its platform alternative, such as host-native secret scanning or push
112
+ protection; it cannot attest the repository CI alternative. Malformed or unknown v0.4 attestation
113
+ control IDs are rejected rather than silently ignored. Every v0.4 attestation file is bound to the
114
+ assessed repository's normalized, sanitized origin URL, or its canonical root when no origin exists,
115
+ and rejects unknown file or claim fields. An optional remote `.git` suffix does not change target
116
+ identity. Human attestations are repository-bound and expiring but not
117
+ commit-bound: they establish accountable platform, organization, or outcome facts whose review
118
+ period may span repository commits. `agentic-scorecard init` derives the target; a file for another
119
+ repository fails closed. A non-`unknown` attestation with a generated `TODO` owner or evidence value
120
+ fails closed, as does any attestation whose review date is later than the assessment time.
121
+
122
+ Controls require every evidence check by default. A v0.4 control may explicitly declare
123
+ `evidence_mode: any` only when the checks are alternative ways to establish the same outcome. A
124
+ repository-only run remains `unknown` when the repository alternative is absent and an external
125
+ alternative has not been collected; it does not infer either a platform pass or a platform failure.
126
+ Supplemental evidence resolves only alternatives with the same scope. A negative claim makes the
127
+ control `not_met` only when every alternative is established negatively; any uncollected alternative
128
+ keeps the control `unknown`.
129
+ The report shows every alternative and its provenance. Control confidence comes from the
130
+ alternative that establishes the decisive pass or complete negative result; supplemental input on a
131
+ different alternative does not relabel the result or its evidence-summary/profile dependency.
132
+ An unresolved control always serializes control confidence as `none`; the supplemental input remains
133
+ visible in its separately labelled claim fields.
134
+ Established-control tables display the scope of the evidence that resolved the control rather than
135
+ an unresolved alternative scope.
136
+
137
+ Level 4 requires time-series or outcome evidence and an improvement decision influenced by it. The
138
+ existence of a dashboard is insufficient.
139
+
140
+ ## Agent evidence bundles
141
+
142
+ An agent evidence bundle is version-bound and target-bound. Claims record scope, status, collector,
143
+ collection and expiry times, a privacy-safe derivation summary, and durable references. The core
144
+ scanner makes no network calls; the agent obtains explicit authorization and uses read-only tools to
145
+ create the bundle. An error is distinct from a negative result and cannot pass a control.
146
+
147
+ Agent evidence can satisfy only controls with `allow_agent_evidence: true` and an allowed scope.
148
+ Deterministic passes take precedence. Repository-scoped claims additionally require tracked files
149
+ to match HEAD and references of the form `repo:<tracked-path>[#Lx-Ly]`; every referenced path must
150
+ exist in the tracked assessment scope at the exact bound commit. Untracked generated artifacts do
151
+ not affect tracked-scope evidence. An agent may use such a claim only to
152
+ establish the control outcome from a nonstandard artifact the deterministic catalog did not
153
+ recognize.
154
+
155
+ `ADRB-SEC-007` deliberately accepts source-backed agent claims at repository, platform, or
156
+ organization scope because enforced untrusted-input safeguards may be implemented as tracked
157
+ adversarial harness tests, platform sandbox or tool policy, or organization-wide controls. The
158
+ claim's scope must identify where enforcement actually resides. Repository-scoped claims remain
159
+ commit-bound and line-referenced; no scope may pass from prose alone, and deterministic repository
160
+ keyword scanning is not an evidence path for this non-compensating security floor.
161
+
162
+ ## Changes and comparability
163
+
164
+ v0.1, v0.2, and v0.3 remain immutable. Scores from v0.1, v0.2, v0.3, and v0.4 are not directly
165
+ comparable because evidence and control semantics changed. Reports are comparable only when
166
+ benchmark version, target profile, repository scope, evidence policy, and assessment mode match.
167
+
168
+ ## Claims
169
+
170
+ Allowed: “We self-assessed repository X against ADRB v0.4.0 on DATE; N controls were
171
+ repository-detected, M agent-collected, and P human-attested. Repository-detected progress was A of
172
+ an offline ceiling C.”
173
+
174
+ Not allowed: “Certified,” “compliant,” “safe,” “secure,” or “independently verified” based only on
175
+ this self-assessment.